Essay Arguments

For Argument's Sake By Tannen: Article Analysis
In the article For Argument's Sake; Why Do We Feel Compelled to Fight About Everything? The
author brings to light an important understanding of why we as a society argue about everything
and why it is necessary in the persuasion process. The most effective way to get a problem solved is
to create an argument debate. (Tannen, Deborah) It is often a natural reaction to become defensive
when another person threatens our belief system, Tannen refers to this process as the "knee–jerk
nature". When a person finds their standing being opposed, one will fight back with debate therefore
causing and extreme case of representing each side. (Tannen, Deborah) It is understood that Tannen's
article falls into the category of the professional value
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Arguments For and Against Censorship Essay
Introduction
Censorship is defined by Caso as the suppression of speech or any other public communication which
may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive politically incorrect as determined by the
government or any other control body (3). Censorship may be justified from the conservative view
whereby the free speech can be maltreated where it undermines the customary principles and
communal solidity as withheld by a particular community.
Arguments for censorship
One of the arguments for the censorship of virtual arts according to Galsworthy is to protect children
from thoughts that may harm their ethical growth (12). Parents have a sole responsibility of
educating their children even before the onset of the formal education....show more content...
Censorship is very important in maintaining government authority which helps in stabilizing the
society. The society enjoys freedoms, rights and privileges due to the stability of the ruling body.
Without this stability, the society would lapse in to a condition of scenery where the lives would
be solitary, poor, and brutal and short as put by Thomas Hobbes (Merryman & Elsen 564). The
stability of the government and society is always assumed to exist without understanding the causes
of this stability. The exposure of the social upheavals poses a great threat to destabilizing the
government through free speeches from the opposition and parties. Since the criminalization of
homosexuality in some African states, there have been free speeches that have posed threats to the
individual government from the west that require to be concealed before being released to the
public because they may spark hatred and distrust. Some of the expressions which are offensive
attack the traditional values of the society and are considered harmful (Caso 13). Censorship helps to
protect these values from attack.
Arguments Against censorship
Censorship of free speech denies the individual democratic rights by silencing and filtering some
important ideas in the favor of others. In this case the censored information defends the majority in
power which often results in oligarchy. For democracy to work properly

Argumentative Essay On Veganism
Running head: RESEARCH ESSAY
In today's society, there are many different diets that people can follow. One of those diets is
called veganism. People who follow this diet refuse to consume meat or other animal products,
including eggs and dairy. Veganism is becoming more and more popular for a number of reasons.
Some people go vegan because they do not want to be responsible for cruelty against animals. Others
choose the vegan diet for their health or to help protect the environment. No matter what the reason,
the truth is clear: the vegan diet is simply the best choice. It is better for animals, better for us, and
better for the Earth.
Farm animals' lives are degrading, painful, and they endure a lot of abuse. The majority of our meat
...show more content...
In addition to their clean consciences, vegans can boast of healthy bodies. A meat–heavy diet can be
disastrous for one's health. The World Health Organization, for instance, has linked red and
processed meats to colorectal cancer (O'Connor, October 2015). Plant–based diets, on the other hand,
benefit our bodies in many ways. The advantages of avoiding meat are summarized in a recent
article from The Duke Health Medicine
News: "Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with lower body mass, lower prevalence and
incidence of diabetes mellitus, lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components
(abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure and fasting blood sugar, high triglycerides and low
HDL cholesterol levels), lower hypertension, lower all–cause mortality, and in some cases, lower risk
of cancer" ("Vegetarian Diets", 2015, p.
4). A vegan diet offers all of the above benefits, as well as several that aren't associated with
vegetarianism:
"Compared to lacto–ovo–vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to provide some added protection
against obesity, hypertension, type–2 diabetes; and cardiovascular mortality" (Le & SabatГ©, 2014,
p. 2142). Despite these facts, many people remain skeptical. That vegans can obtain all the nutrients
their bodies need, such as protein. This skepticism is unfounded: legumes, tofu, and other staples of
the vegan diet provide plenty of protein. For example, according to the

Arguments Against Juries
Arguments For and Against Juries
The right to a trial by jury is a tradition that goes right to the heart of the British legal system. It is a
right fiercely fought for, and fiercely defended at those times when its powers have been seen to be
under threat – as those backing reforms are finding. The tradition of being "tried by a jury of ones
peers" probably has its origins in Anglo Saxon custom, which dictated that an accused man could be
acquitted if enough people came forward to swear his innocence. Trial by jury was first enshrined in
law in what has been seen as the world's first proclamation of human rights – the Magna Carter. The
document, decreed in 1215 by King John after a rebellion by...show more content...
Minor offences, such as drunkenness, could only be tried by magistrates, and major offences, such
as murder and rape, only by jury. The government now wants to limit the number of cases which are
"triable either way".
There have been many debates throughout time about the effectivness of juries. SWR worldwide
was commisioned by The Bar Council and The Law Society to conduct research of 903 members of
the public aged between 18 and over across England. The findings were as follows;
[IMAGE]
The above chart shows a clear agreement of the general public on juries and the trust they show in
their abilities. Similarly the research showed that the public has more faith in police and juries than
others in the justice system.
В· Respondents are most likely to have confidence in the police (81%) and juries (80%) than in
other players in the justice system.
В· Most think a jury of 12 individuals rather than a judge and two magistrates would be more likely
to reflect their own (73%) and society at large's (80%) views and values.
В· In fact, two thirds (64%) say that, should they appear as a defendant in court, they would prefer
to have a jury of their peers rather than a judge and two magistrates or a judge alone decide their case.
However, the same people that make the argument against juries may criticise those who

Argumentative Essay On English Class
What I am about to do is inform you on how to survive the ferocious English 1302 course to make
life a bit easier on you. I mean, you're at the edge of your seat dying with loads of work, starving
like a dying child, living off of pennies and the only thing that is keeping you from collapsing is
your Starbucks drink that is filled with four shots of espresso, right? Well, by the time you get to the
end of this letter, you'll thank me later for it.
When you enter your English class, you will come across many assignments. They happen to be your
annotated bibliography and your researched argument essay, or in other words RAE. The purpose of
the bibliography is to critique sources and gather enough data for you essay. It includes citations, a
summary of your topic and personal thoughts of the sources you chose. The RAE is a persuasive
essay where you attempt to create an argument that is supported with the information you gathered
in your annotated bibliography. In my RAE, I argued that children can recuperate after their parents'
separation. Its purpose was to demonstrate that if parents were to come together and realize that
...show more content...
I learned that by annotating a certain part of the reading, it helped increase my understanding. Not
only that but it helped me not miss a single bit of important information. Writing notes in the
margins of the text was really helpful because it was a summary of the entire paragraph and
whenever I would look back at my notes, it reminded me of what I read. Also, circling words I
didn't know was very accommodating because again, it helped me understand the concept a bit
more. Underlining words that seem important to you is a big tip I suggest because you are able to
use that information when you are talking about your source. You can expand that information by
linking it to another similar source. Therefore, it is important to annotate. It'll take up extra time but
it will be worth

What Are The Arguments For The Great Gatsby
Arguments Portrayed by Jay Gatsby
In the eye opening novel, The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, there are many arguments based
on society that the author was trying to make through his use of characterization. The dark novel is
about love, expectations, disappointments, false hopes, and an overall look on what the narrator,
Nick Carraway, experiences in the summer of 1922, spent in the town of West Egg. There were
various amounts of arguments about society that were displayed by Fitzgerald throughout many
different characters based upon their lifestyles and personality. However, Search for Perfection and
Illusion vs. Reality are the two most important arguments about society that Fitzgerald made
throughout the characterization of Jay Gatsby.
Search for Perfection is one very important argument about society that is expressed through Jay
Gatsby's personality, love for Daisy, and lifestyle. For example, Gatsby had parties portraying his
beautiful lifestyle causing Nick to say "Your place looks like the world's fair!" (Fitzgerald...show
more content...
Reality is also an argument about society that Fitzgerald expressed through Jay Gatsby's personality
and the way he thought about things in his life. For example, Gatsby's rise to wealth was observed
by others causing Nick to say "And it was from Cody that he inherited money–a legacy of twenty
thousand dollars." ( Fitzgerald 108). This shows an illusion about people thinking that Jay Gatsby
inherited his money, but in reality he made his money all by himself. Daisy is involved in this
argument due to her saying stuff to Gatsby like, " You know I love you.' ( Fitzgerald 123). This
demonstrates an illusion due to Gatsby thinking that Daisy will actually go back to him relationship
wise, but in reality she wouldn't leave Tom for Gatsby, even though she wants to and still truly
loves him. These ideas prove how Fitzgerald made Jay Gatsby into a character that has a big
imagination, and not a lot of reality checks upon

Arguments Of Inequality
Inequality and its impact on economic growth, is broad state of affairs that has been investigated by
researchers over the years. There are differing points of views on the importance and impact of
inequality on economic growth. In his article Tilly argued the importance and negative impact of
inequality on the economy, although sometimes over–passing some issues or overstating certain
arguments that are not relevant for the topic, in a precise and simplified way . This review will
emphasize the deficiencies in the arguments, evaluate the irrelevant statements and assess the flow
of arguments and writing style in a critical manner. Tilly discusses the relationship between
inequality and economic growth first by illustrating two conservative

Arguments Against Government Intervention
Government Intervention in Economic Welfare
Friedrich Hayek stated that, "The more the state plans, the more difficult planning becomes for the
individual." This statement is narrow–minded and does not allow for the thought of individuals to
consider: To what extent should the government intervene in theeconomy to protect the interests of
our society? Free market economists argue that government intervention should be limited as
government intervention tends to bring about a wasteful portion of assets yet forgets that there tends
to be inequality in income, wealth and opportunity. However, others argue there is a strong case for
government intervention for creating greater equality. (Lecture) Where one nation may support a
public enterprise,...show more content...
Some believe where government money is being improperly spent, that money should be put to
better use in areas such as inefficient health and welfare programs. However, the over–involvement
of government occurs more at the federal level of government than at the state level, to look out for
national safety while also securing the interests of our society and protecting us with military
strength. A major government intervention that takes place is our economy is when the government
plays a direct role in the private economy by supporting our active military. Economists generally
recognize that the military's impact on the economy is fundamental to the nation's continued social
and political stability. However, different parts of the government's intervention in the economy are
not usually

Examples Of Argumentative Essay
Argumentative essay presents a point of view about something and explains the reasons in order to
win readers' agreement. It is built around a specific statement (or main premise) that is debatable
within the field in which students are studying. In other words, at the center of an argumentative
essay is a statement with which readers may disagree. The argumentative essay will need to support
that statement in a manner that convinces the readers of its truth. It mainly strives to convince the
reader of the writer's point of view, using reasonable and ethical methods .The process of argument
composition varies from writer to writer, most writers follow these three stages: forming an
argument, which can consist of discovering a motive for writing and identifying an audience to
address, discovering and sharpening a position, and developing an appropriate style; supporting the
argument; and reviewing the argument, which can include considering the image projected by
argument, making substantial additions or deletions to a first draft, and adding an introduction and
conclusion (Cheng and Chen 2009, Day,1997, Liu,2005,Mayberry,2009)....show more content...
The first feature is superstructure which refers to the organizational plan of any text and the linear
progression of the text. The second feature is the quality of logical reasoning which is assessed by
analyzing the interrelationships of writers' assertions and the associated support or data provided to
substantiate those claims. The third feature is identified as persuasive appeal, including affective
appeal and establishment of writer credibility. Finally, she notes that audience awareness is an
important characteristic of successful argumentative writing. The writer must observe an awareness
of the reader's perspective by dealing implicitly or explicitly with possible

Arguments Against Jury Trial
Even though a little more of felony convictions are handled by juries, some attorneys perspectives
encourage a trial by jury, arguments can be made in favor for jury trials that reinforce the risk for a
negative outcome is low. Jury trial practices have evolved depending on the state, some states permit
"jurors to take notes) (308) "Other practices, such as providing at least one written copy of
instruction and providing guidance on conducting deliberations, are also common in state
courts."(308–309. To minimize the risk of bias interpretation of judgment upon the allegedcrime,
attorneys try to play toward the juror's conscience. If they are fully aware of what their findings
mean to the defendant and they do not consider all facts by the

In order to have a good argumentative essay, there are a few important standards of critical
thinking that is needed to be found in the essay such as the clearness, accuracy, importance or
relevance, sufficiency, depth, breath and precision that is stated by Nosich. The strength of this
argumentative essay is consider weak because it does not capture the interest of the reader and
was not persuasive enough; even though from the introduction of the argumentative essay
includes full sentences and a good opinion, the argumentative essay is all objective. The
introduction includes too much of the emotional appeals, such as when it wrote " Day after day
the number of people worshipping this icon has been growing since the birth of this creature. well
to many it may seem harmless idol but in my opinion, Mickey Mouse is an 'devil in disguise'
influencing the minds of young and old people to adopt the culture of the 'devil' which doesn't
blend will with the moral values of society and should be banned". To improve the introduction, the
writer should include of all objectives statements relative facts and appeals to the mind of people
who agree or disagree with the topic.

Many people and organizations use writing and visual methods to persuade readers to their view. In
such pieces, the author will use many different tricks and appeals in order to draw the reader to his
or her train of thought. According to Andrea Lunsford in her instructional book The Everyday
Writer, these appeals can be broken down into three main types– logical, emotional and ethical. A
logical argument uses facts, statistics and surveys to back up what the author is saying and is
commonly referred to as logos. An ethical argument is one that tries to build up the authors
characters and prove to the reader that the author is qualified to give his or her views on the topic at
hand. Ethical arguments are commonly called ethos. Finally,...show more content...
Overall, the argument uses pathos to play on the human fear of torture and sway the reader with no
real logical backing. She uses quotes and phrases like "[torture] endangers our soldiers on the
battlefield" and "damage[s] our country's image," calling on the sense of patriotism throughout
America to turn the people against torture. Applebaum even goes so far as to throw out the baseless
conjecture "the use of 'special methods' might help explain why the war is going so badly
(Applebaum 37)." This appeal to emotion tries to sway the reader against torture by making the
assumption that there is some connection between the use of torture and the effectiveness of enemy
soldiers – a great example of the use of pathos to mislead readers. Just as "The Torture Myth" relied
mainly on pathos and scattered logos, the "2011 Louisiana Life March Promo Video (Louisiana
March for Life,)" a promotional video for an anti–abortion march on the Louisiana State Capitol
building, relies on the same argumentative appeals. The list of sponsors appearing at the end of the
promotional video provides the only ethical appeal for the argument. This appeal, though taking up
just a fraction of the runtime, can be the difference between gathering just hundreds of supporters for
a cause and gathering tens of thousands of supporters. The video provided one logical appeal in the
statement, "Since 1973, nearly 500,000 Louisiana children

Arguments In 12 Angry Men
The Arguments of 12 Angry Men In the film 12 Angry Men (1957), directed by Sidney Lumet, is
a film about a group of 12 jurors on a murder case. As the beginning of the film begins, the men are
seen entering the deliberation room to come to a consensus on the case that was assigned. In the
case, a young juvenile is being tried for the murder of his own father. If he is found guilty, the boy
will be sent to the chair and will die by execution. If he is found not guilty then he will live. As the
12 jurors all sit down to make a beginning vote (aiming to create a unanimous consensus), only one
of the men votes that the defendant is not guilty of the presented charges. Juror #8, the opposition to
everyone, believes that there is reasonable doubt...show more content...
The argument started out with juror #8 stating that he didn't know if the kid was guilty or not, he
just believed that there were a lot of holes in the case that would lead him to believe there is
reasonable doubt in the conviction. Though this seemed like a weak argument, there were many
different key points that were made to undermine the original argument. Jumping from one fact to
the next, juror #8 eventually persuaded the entire group to change their vote to not guilty. Juror #8,
when presenting the various portions of his argument, always remains calm, as well as the other
men who eventually join his side. Juror #4, though on the original position, actually provides a lot
of this logical approach. He admits that the opposition makes sense and when the argument
overrides his, he admits he is wrong and changes his vote. This type of argument, when proven with
ethos and pathos, is successful and will gain logical support to win the overall

Argumentative Essay On Electoral College
Electoral College
Despite the Electoral College system being founded by the founding fathers in America and being
there as long as the Constitution exists, many people still do not have sufficient knowledge on how
it works. The Electoral College does not provide honest presidential elections rather it has the
potential to undo the will of people at any point from the selection of electors to the vote tallying in
Congress (Shaw, 3). Electoral College in the United States has played a major role in depressing the
voter's turnout. Every State is given an equal number of electoral votes despite the population and in
turn, the system has put in place no measure to encourage the voters to take part in the elections.
Besides, the system distorts...show more content...
The system is obsolete owing to the new methods of research and becoming aware of issues as well
as faster sharing of information for the Americans to know any presidential candidate. Besides,
United States of America has witnessed growth almost in every aspect of life and has shown the
ability to handle new developments articulating the strength of the country to establish and manage a
new electoral system. The reality that most of the states do not have laws requiring electors to vote
according to the will of their state, the electors are unbound thus the system create the possibility of
rogue electors. Also, the system presents a situation where the presidential election winner is
determined by the House of Representatives causing disenfranchising a significant number of voters.
Another problem surrounding the Electoral College system is that it allows one–party states, states
that almost always go to one party. In this context, a Democrat who casts a vote in a mostly
Republican state feels that his vote is wasted because of no way that state will be won by a
Democrat. Besides, the system is based on two–party elections, the Democrat and the Republican
leaving Americans with two candidates to choose (Belenky, 364). The voters end up picking the
candidate with fewer issues rather than the one they support. In my opinion, people feel that
Electoral College has single–handedly defeated

Arguments Against Warning Labels
Imagine your selling sodas but you hardly win any money why,
because there's a warning label that says it could kill you. I strongly believe that you should enjoy
your soda in peace. My three reasons that sodas shouldn't have warning labels is 1 they already have
nutrition facts,2 everything has sugar, and 3 it wouldn't sell as well.
In my opinion warning labels are a waste of money. I believe that my opposition would say that
warning labels could help or even save people. But in my eyes people could just ignore them. On
the other hand there's already labels called nutrition facts. There wouldn't be a point in putting
warning labels. Just read the nutrition facts.
If drinks had warning labels sodas wouldn't sell because people think they

Argumentative Essay On Climate Change
Climate change can be traced down to since the mid–1800s, when the industrial revolution first
started taking place all around the world. Lives of human and animal species have been negatively
affected since then, with events such as natural disasters, the melting of ice in polar regions, and
change in weather and living conditions. Climate change in polar regions, in particular, has faced
the most damage compared to any other region because of its location in regard to the sun. Climate
change holds many different views and opinions about the effects, and even the existence itself, but
evidence is clear and unmistakable in global ramifications and local impact in polar regions.
"...Climate change [is] the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people'", skeptics like
Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma like to say. Climate change is change in climate patterns due to an
increase in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases produced by certain human activity.
According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, data taken by satellite has shown that the
Arctic cover has decreased by 30% over the past 30 years, and this change, which also include
change in sea ice and permafrost, in artic weather and climate is caused by humans. Although
numerous scientists have confirmed the legitimacy of climate change, there are different views on
whether climate change is real or not. Government officials like Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma or
Senator Marco Rubio of Florida have explicitly stated that they do not believe climate change is
neither real, nor caused by humans (Tom McCarthy, 2014). On the other hand, mainstream media
and other media outlets, such as The Independent and The Economist, have reported their findings
of climate change and its legitimacy. The Independent (Conner, S. 2011) reported that records of
these changes were taken by military submarines, land measurements, and satellite data to prove ice
in polar regions are melting faster and faster. Satellites have tracked sea ice since the 1970s and by
nuclear submarines since the Cold War,
according to Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University and it was predicted that by September
2015, there would be no more sea ice. (Conner, S. 2011). Luckily, sea ice has not

Arguments Against The Idea Of Climate Change
There are many opinions for and against the idea of climate change. With all the different
opinions, it can be hard to know what is true and what is just fake news. It's no wonder people get
so confused on the issue. Two main arguments that I will be addressing in this report is whether or
not the Earth is warming and if in fact the earth is warming it does it affect plant or animal life.
The first argument is that there is no evidence that the Earth has been warming in the recent years.
The believers of this statement say that there has been a flat–line temperature trend since 1997 and
that the temperature is not going to rise.
The second argument is that Global Warming doesn't affect the environment, in particular, plants and
animals. The...show more content...
(Albright, Gerson and Mutiibwa) This is a scary thought. I happen to love the birds singing in my
back yard, I hate to think that so many would die because of climate change. Not only would birds
suffer from the rising temperature but many animals.
Not to mention the deprivation warming temperature will have on the plant life. According to
Jennifer Balmer, a science writer and journalist, "More than 60% of plants shifted their distributions
downward, toward warmer, lower elevations–despite significant climate warming across the
regions..." making it "A double–edged sword because as temperatures rise, water needs will also
increase." (Balmer)
According to science, Global Warming does exist, in fact it is destroying our environment. If we
want to continue to hear birds singing, and see polar bears walking along the snow, then we need to
cut back on our carbon dioxide output. It will require unique thinking and sacrifice to accomplish
slowly rebuilding our environment but I hope it can be

Arguments Against Vaccines
Vaccines have become more important in recent years since there are newer and more dangerous
sicknesses. There are new vaccines made every single day to keep up with the rapid growth of
new diseases. When vaccines first came out, there were a lot of questions concerning whether
they were safe or not. Many people refused to get vaccines because they did not believe the
vaccines were helping, but was making things worse. Although, vaccines were developed to help
save people's lives and protect them from many foreign diseases. The need for vaccines grew a great
deal in several years due to the fact that doctors did not want young kids and babies to get sick since
they were more likely to die from a disease than adults (NIAID).
There are numerous...show more content...
Although the use of vaccines was questioned many times, they are still very vital to today's life. The
vaccines have been changed many times in order to meet the needs of the new diseases. Vaccines
were not always liked by parents, but they soon found out that the ingredients in the vaccine was
causing problems in some kids so the doctors fixed those problems and made them safer for
children. Vaccines are very important for communities because it helps keep a large number of
people safe. There was a big controversy about whether or not the vaccines caused autism–like
symptoms. Many parents started noticing that their children stopped showing signs of growth and
start declining in their speech and movement. The doctors found out that it was the ingredients. The
ingredients reacted with each other and caused children to either have mercury or too much
aluminum in their body. Really young children are more likely to die from a disease then adults are
because their immune system is not strong enough yet. Even though vaccines have their side effects
and problems, they always help keep children healthier and father from danger than they would be if
they do not any vaccines. They are very important to family health

Arguments Against Vaccines
Humans have benefited from vaccines for more than two centuries.(Basics) A vaccine is a product
that produces immunity from a disease and can be administered through needle, injections, mouth,
or aerosol. (Basics) Due to vaccinations, illnesses such as rubella, diphtheria, smallpox, polio, and
whooping cough are now prevented. (Vaccines) Vaccines are effective to stop epidemics. Vaccines
should be required for children. The 2012 outbreak sickened 42,000 people in the United States,
which was the worst outbreak since 1955. (Vaccines) It was caused in 2011 by 49 states not meeting
the 92–94% herd immunity threshold for whooping cough. (Vaccines) Although vaccines should be
required, sometimes they are not always guaranteed to work. According

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and
offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument may also recognize opposing viewpoints and
incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a
lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning, and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about.
The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint
on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about

Essay Arguments

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Plus de Online Paper Writing Services Haynes

Plus de Online Paper Writing Services Haynes (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Essay Arguments