Four very popular and widespread open source content management systems especially Drupal, TYPO3 and Wordpress compared on strong and weak points. Based on there market share we compared Drupal, TYPO3 and Wordpress on differences based on a business point of view. As with every comparison some strong points could also be seen as weak points and vice versa.

1. TEXT HERE
DRUPAL | TYPO3 | NEOS | WORDPRESS
Ric van Westhreenen
YOUWE

2. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?

3. ABOUT ME

4. MARKET SHARE
WORDPRESS
TYPO3 Neos
Drupal
TYPO3 CMS

5. DRUPAL: flexible, fast out-of-
the-box solution to get you
started real quick

6. STRONG:
distributions
themes
taxonomy
huge
marketing
fields/views

7. WEAK:
content concept
abundance of roadmap
security
no certification
most stuff in modules
learning curve

8. TYPO3: feature-complete
enterprise level CMS, do it all
system for multi-site & multi-
lingual environments

9. STRONG:
pagetree
certification
roadmap
ready-to-use
secure
rights management/workflows
backwards compatibility

10. WEAK:
abundance of essentials
typoscript
no themes / distributions
technical image
quality control on extensions

11. NEOS: editor central CMS with
promising features

12. STRONG:
pagetree
inline editing
no-learningcurve for editor
image editing
node-based

13. WEAK:
no clear roadmap
installed base
lack of enterprise features
documentation
typoscript2

14. WORDPRESS: easy as shitting

15. STRONG:
simple install
hosted anywhere
huge installed base
auto update
loads of documentation
themes

16. WEAK:
quality control plugins
content management
security
enterprise features
multilingual
workflow
user rights

17. 60-70% of all websites is still
not using a CMS

18. Conclusion:
Every CMS has weak and
strong points. In the end they
help editors publish content.

19. TEXT HERE
THANKS!
about.me/vanwesthreenen