Some suggestions to get started: REVIEW First, review the readings.  Use what you have learned from these readings as a basis for your own argument.  When I say "as a basis," I mean as support for your own claim.  Your claim may be similar to other ethical positions, but it is still yours.  Use your own ideas and examples to support your claim.  Make your argument unique to you and avoid merely restating or summarizing what others have said. Use resources as support for your argument--as back up. CONTEXT You are being asked to argue for an obligation that is ethical or right--for the common good. In our society, determining what is morally or ethically right is often confusing and opinionated or personal.  Our society is struggling in this way.  Thus the need for strong reasoning in the service for what is right.  In a culture that is confused about what or how to value the natural world, we need strong claims for values.  We need to be convinced of the best principles.  If we ask others to honor, respect, protect, or conserve the natural world, we must be able to provide really strong reasons for doing so. BASIS For Leopold, the reasons to love and respect and protect the natural world are rooted in ecological truths that humans often overlook or ignore because we are caught in self-interest or confused about our priorities.  We are ideological beings in need of an ethical awakening, according to Leopold.  CLAIM So, your claim should address what you think our ethical obligation to the environment truly is, and your rationale should assert the principle or main reason for that obligation. WHAT NOT TO DO Avoid the pitfall of arguing for what we already do or know, such as recycling and banning plastic.  We do not need to argue for practices or actions here.  This argument is for ethics--a way of thinking.  This is a philosophical, not practical argument. WHAT TO DO Your argument is for your philosophy--your better way of thinking--about our true obligations to our world. SUPPORTING YOUR PHILOSOPHY You can ground your argument in what you understand about ecology .  The basis for a philosophy must be in reality.  Ecology helps us understand our reality, the real conditions and workings of life on Earth.  Ecology provides the tools that you can give your readers to convince them to change their values. Prompt : In your informed view, what is our ethical obligation to our environment?          Directions :  Based on what you have learned in this module, present your own specific ethical argument, borrowing ideas from others as needed.  Defend your position against the reasonable objections of your audience. Support your argument with ethical reasoning, selected facts gathered from our readings and viewing, as well as persuasive concepts from Leopold’s “The Land Ethic.”           Some brainstorming questions to help you think through your        position: What ethical obligations do you believe arise from being an individ.

1. Some suggestions to get started:
REVIEW
First, review the readings. Use what you have learned from
these readings as a basis for your own argument. When I say
"as a basis," I mean as support for your own claim. Your claim
may be similar to other ethical positions, but it is still yours.
Use your own ideas and examples to support your claim. Make
your argument unique to you and avoid merely restating or
summarizing what others have said. Use resources as support
for your argument--as back up.
CONTEXT
You are being asked to argue for an obligation that is ethical or
right--for the common good. In our society, determining what is
morally or ethically right is often confusing and opinionated or
personal. Our society is struggling in this way. Thus the need
for strong reasoning in the service for what is right. In a
culture that is confused about what or how to value the natural
world, we need strong claims for values. We need to be
convinced of the best principles. If we ask others to honor,
respect, protect, or conserve the natural world, we must be able
to provide really strong reasons for doing so.
BASIS
For Leopold, the reasons to love and respect and protect the
natural world are rooted in ecological truths that humans often
overlook or ignore because we are caught in self-interest or
confused about our priorities. We are ideological beings in
need of an ethical awakening, according to Leopold.

2. CLAIM
So, your claim should address what you think our ethical
obligation to the environment truly is, and your rationale should
assert the principle or main reason for that obligation.
WHAT NOT TO DO
Avoid the pitfall of arguing for what we already do or know,
such as recycling and banning plastic. We do
not
need to argue for practices or actions here. This argument is
for ethics--a way of thinking. This is a philosophical, not
practical argument.
WHAT TO DO
Your argument is for your philosophy--your better way of
thinking--about our true obligations to our world.
SUPPORTING YOUR PHILOSOPHY
You can ground your argument in what you understand about
ecology
. The basis for a philosophy must be in reality. Ecology helps
us understand our reality, the real conditions and workings of
life on Earth. Ecology provides the tools that you can give your
readers to convince them to change their values.
Prompt
:
In your informed view, what is our ethical obligation to our
environment?

3. Directions
: Based on what you have learned in this module, present your
own specific ethical argument, borrowing ideas from others as
needed. Defend your position against the reasonable objections
of your audience. Support your argument with ethical reasoning,
selected facts gathered from our readings and viewing, as well
as persuasive concepts from Leopold’s “The Land Ethic.”
Some brainstorming questions to help you think through your
position:
What ethical obligations do you believe arise from being an
individual member of the biotic community?
Is there an ecological or scientific basis for your position? How
can we make the connection between scientific truth and ethics?
Should humans strive to empathize with the non-human world?
Why or why not?
Can and will you "practice what you preach?
Audience
: Address an audience of your friends and peers. Aim to appeal
to their level of awareness and critical thinking.
Length
: 1250-1500 words approximately.
Format:
Use MLA format for the layout of the essay, as well as citation
and documentation.
MLA format.
Sources

4. : Use the materials we have read or viewed in this module.
Draw examples and evidence from these sources. If you need
current data about environmental issues, you should do
additional research. An essay should always reflect the course
materials.
Checklist
:
Argument related, detailed title
Hook
Argumentative Thesis (claim and rationale)
At least 4 body paragraphs with topic and conclusion sentences
Evidence, examples, and reasoning drawn from course materials
Strong final paragraph that draws the big conclusion from the
body
Careful editing
MLA formatted Work Cited