1. Approach to Slum Upgrading
Multi-Stakeholder
Partnership Meeting
Addis Ababa, 9 July 2014
1
2. Urbanisation trends and challenges
Unique speed and scale of urbanisation in Asia - the sheer size of urban
population increase defines the challenges in Asia
Currently, one-half of the global population lives in Asia
Over the next 35 years to 2050, Asia’s urban population is expected to
increase from around 1.9 billion to 3.2 billion
The largest increases in urban population are expected in India, which will
add 497 million to its urban population, China - 341 million, Indonesia - 92
million, Pakistan - 92 million, Bangladesh - 60 million and the Philippines -
56 million
2
3. Urbanisation trends and challenges
Poverty levels in Asia have declined significantly over the past 25 years and there have
been significant improvements in human development indicators but the region still has
the largest concentration of poor
There is a direct relation between human development and urbanisation level for Asian
countries
There is a positive co-relation between per capita GDP and urbanisation level of Asian
countries but urbanisation is a necessary but not the only condition for economic growth
In addition to low income levels, the other manifestation of urban poverty in Asia are:
- low access to safe water and adequate sanitation facilities
- low access to housing - half of the world’s urban slum-dwellers are estimated to be
in the region,
• India and China alone account for 65 per cent of the Asian slum population
• Region’s group of least developed countries have slum concentration at 72 per
cent in urban areas, which is about 30 per cent more than the regional average
3
4. Improving QoL of Slum-dwellers - Approaches
Re-location to alternative sites
Forcible or through consensus
o Brazil now has a guiding policy on voluntary resettlement
Sites and services or built housing units
In-situ redevelopment
Using land as a resource – incentive FSI
VGF
In-situ slum upgrading
Physical, social, economic, organizational and environmental
improvements undertaken cooperatively and locally among citizens,
community groups, businesses and local authorities
4
5. In situ Slum Upgrading
Upgrading unserved slum settlements is a sustainable and scalable strategy
for improving the living conditions of the urban poor
Upgrading makes a highly visible, immediate, and large difference in the
quality of life of the urban poor
Investment in local public goods through upgrading catalyzes private
investment by residents, unleashing their vast productive energy and
leveraging private capital
the international community has successful experience supporting
upgrading
Local authorities lack capacity
to engage multiple stakeholders, particularly communities
Retrofit network services in dense settlements
5
6. In situ Slum Upgrading Actions
Installing or improving basic infrastructure
Removal or mitigation of environmental hazards
Providing incentives for community management and maintenance
Constructing or rehabilitating community facilities such as nurseries, health
posts, community open space
Regularizing security of tenure
Home improvement
Relocation/compensation for the small number of residents dislocated by
the improvements
Improving access to health care and education as well as social support
programs to address issues of security, violence, among others
Enhancement of income-earning opportunities through training and micro-
credit
6
7. Examples – In Situ SU Programmes
City-wide slum upgrading in Thailand
Ban Mankong (secure housing) programme – national slum and squatter
settlement upgrading programme
Targets upgrading of housing, infrastructure, living environment and
land tenure security covering 200 cities/towns in Thailand
Implemented by Community Organisations Development Institute
(CODI) under Ministry of Social Development and Human Security
Programme provides infrastructure subsidies and soft housing loans
directly to informal communities, which survey, design and implement
their own housing and settlement improvement projects – in the same
place where possible or on land in close proximity
7
8. Examples – In Situ SU Programmes
Asian Coalition for Community Action (ACCA) Programme
Under implementation in 250 Asian cities
The 4 programmatic pillars:
Small grant to communities for small scale infrastructure
Loan to communities for large housing projects
Help communities design housing and infrastructure by providing architectural and
planning assistance
Help communities acquire formal land title, by negotiating land purchase, a land grant
or a long-term lease from the owners
Major element of the programme is community savings
Often adopts a city-wide approach, linking community savings into a larger City
Development Fund
Leverages funds from government and other sources for inclusion in the City
Development Fund
8
9. Examples – National SU Programmes
Kampung Improvement Programme (KIP) Indonesia
Government-assisted, self-help community planning programme
Provides three levels of infrastructure
Paved access roads, bridges and footpaths
Water supply, sanitation and drainage canals
Schools and health clinics
These improvements are threaded along existing rights-of-way, with little
disturbance to the existing housing.
Although the programme does not offer direct housing assistance, the
improved access, flood control and increased economic activity within the
kampungs has stimulated home improvement
9
10. Examples – National SU Programmes
Earlier National Slums Upgrading Programme – Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY)
Curative and preventive approach - upgrading of existing slums as well as
prevention of future growth of slums
‘Whole City’ approach
Legislative framework for property rights to slum- dwellers
Easing credit availability for urban poor for housing, including
interest/capital subsidy
Public-Private Partnerships for affordable housing
New paradigm of inclusive planning - reservation of land for housing the
poor in city master plans and security of land tenure to slum-dwellers
10