18. Cochrane Systematic Reviews (522; another 500 in preparation) Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (1895) Registry of Randomised Controlled Trials (218,355)
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
Notes de l'éditeur
This summarises the data from about 12 DGH’s around the England and Scotland. In summary, HO’s (who don’t read at all) are being taught by old farts (who read 30 minutes a week).
Cochrane symbol CDSR display of options Stroke graphical display
covers of ACPJC and EBM
covers of ACPJC and EBM
covers of ACPJC and EBM
top quote: Smith R: Where is the wisdom...? The poverty of medical evidence. BMJ 1991;303:798-9. bottom quote: Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States: Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1978. Office of Technology Assessment of the Congress of the United States: The Impact of Randomised Clinical; Trials on Health Policy and Medical Practice. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1983. Williamson JW, Goldschmidt PG, Jillson IA: Medical Practice Information Demonstration Project: Final Report. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Department of Health Education and Welfare Contract #282-77-0068GS. Baltimore, Maryland. Policy Research Inc 1979. Dubinsky M, Ferguson JH: Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Medicare Coverage Assessment. Internat J Technology Assessment in Health Care 1990;6:480-8.
Health outrage of the week” reported by Burrelle’s Radio Clips, 75 East Northfield Road, Livingston, New Jersey, 17 October 1993.