The document summarizes the Student Ambassadors for Digital Literacy (SADL) program at the London School of Economics. The 3-year program trains undergraduate students to become peer mentors who help other students improve their digital and information literacy skills through workshops. Workshops cover topics like finding and evaluating information, academic research practices, and managing digital footprints. Evaluations found the program improved students' skills and confidence while also providing leadership experience for senior ambassadors. The document discusses challenges like engaging more students and integrating social media platforms to encourage online participation.
Understanding student digital literacies: reflecting on differences, divids, visitors and residents
1. Understanding student digital literacies:
reflecting on differences, divides, visitors and
residents
Andra Fry and Jane Secker
London School of Economics and Political Science
APT 2016: 5th July 2016
2. Student Ambassadors for
Digital Literacy (SADL)
• Undergraduate
• Collaborative
• Peer support
Completed 3 years
Project Programme
3. SADL aims
• To understand students’ existing digital and
information literacy (DIL) skills.
• To explore how best to support students to
improve these skills and to provide peer support.
4. SADL Welcome event
Workshop 1: Finding and evaluating information
Workshop 2: Academic practices: reading and
research
Workshop 3: Managing and sharing information
Workshop 4: Your digital footprint
SADL Celebration
All resources on the project website:
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources/
Programme overview
7. SADL Senior Ambassadors
• Completed SADL in a
previous year
• Work alongside staff
• Give input into workshop
content
• Guide and support students
in workshops
• Lead student projects
8. SADL: the impact on students
“I am glad I joined SADL because
I wouldn't have known anything
about copyright or any qualitative
skills if I didn't. So in terms of
study skills that really helped me
a lot like research and managing
information and things. It helped
me through my second year.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALaUhlWRnTg
9. Evaluation – Impact on students
Digital & Information Literacy skills
+ Transferability Study Personal lives Employability
+ Referencing skills Using new apps Blogging
Managing their digital identity Using LinkedIn effectively
− some expected more technical skills; e.g. Excel, coding
More than ‘tech’ skills
+ Public speaking Presentation skills Confidence
Collaborative working
10. Evaluation – Impact on the SADL
team
Significant impact on Senior Ambassadors
+ Leadership skills Teaching skills Managing projects
+ ‘How SADL got me hired’
Important staff development
+ Greater level of engagement with UGs
+ New teaching methods and approaches
11. Evaluation – value of
collaboration
Value of collaborative approach to teaching
+ Friendly, informal approach, peer support and friendships
− Some students wanted more teaching / less discussions
Student project had mixed responses
− Need for greater consistency as dependent on seniors
− Student engagement and effort varied considerably
13. Improving and enhancing SADL
• Selling SADL in the right way is crucial
• Catering to different levels of knowledge and interests:
entrepreneurs vs academic skills
• What is an ambassador and how can they provide peer
support in year 1?
• Run sessions at different times: evenings?
• Make project more relevant and embedded
• Engage more staff with the programme’s aims
14. Visitors and residents
White, David and Le Cornu, Alison (2011) Visitors and residents: a new typology for online engagement. First
Monday. 16 (9). Available at http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171/3049
15. Students’ online engagement
• Institutional tools – mostly used as visitors
• Social media apps – mostly used as residents
– e.g. Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, Skype
• Less likely to use the same app for both personal
& academic life
How can social media apps be used for
academic purposes to encourage engagement?
17. Biggest challenges in 2016/17
• Scaling up and broadening the programme: LSE Life
• Developing the peer learning aspects of SADL to
empower students
• Keeping it student-led and student focused
• Maintaining the SADL community
19. Further reading
Lau, Doriane, Secker, Jane and Bell, Maria (2015) Student ambassadors for digital literacy (SADL):
evaluation & impact report. Learning Technology and Innovation (LTI), London, UK. Available at:
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63357/
LSE SADL Project website and resources (2014) Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources
HEA (2014) Framework for partnership in learning and teaching. York, Higher Education Academy.
Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/students-as-partners
Jisc (2015) Developing successful staff-student partnerships.
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-successful-student-staff-partnerships
Secker, Jane, Karnad, Arun , Bell, Maria, Wilkinson, Ellen and Provencher, Claudine (2014) Student
ambassadors for digital literacy (SADL): project final report. Learning Technology and Innovation ,
London, UK. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59479/
Bell, Maria and Moon, Darren and Secker, Jane (2012) Undergraduate support at LSE: the ANCIL
report. The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Available at:
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48058/
White, David and Le Cornu, Alison (2011) Visitors and residents: a new typology for online
engagement. First Monday. 16 (9). Available at
http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171/3049
Notes de l'éditeur
Jane
Timings –
2 min intro from Jane
5 mins Brief intro to SADL Andra (slides 2-7)
7 mins evaluation by Jane (slide 8-13)
1 min Intro to V and R (Jane) (slide 14)
3 mins activity on V and R (Andra) (slide 14-16)
2 mins biggest challenges (Jane slide 17-20)
10 min for questions at end (ha ha!)
Andra
4 X 1.5 hour interactive workshops
Finding and evaluating information
Reading and academic practices
Managing and sharing information
Managing your online identify
Activities between sessions including blogging
A group project to improve: learning at LSE, learning spaces, peer support and the VLE
Loans of equipment to make video, interview students etc.
Andra
Originally funded by the Higher Education Academy as part of their Changing Learning Landscapes programme from Oct 2013 to July 2014.
2012 audit found UG student support for Information/digital literacy was patchy
Staff assumed aspects of IL were covered by others or students would already know it – this is very dangerous given the diverse student population at LSE. Some students may be tech savvy – some are not – students may use Facebook, students are not experts in their discipline and scholarly practices
Approach to transition was often sink or swim and help offered as remedial or targeted at specific groups such as students who’s first language is not English (this is probably half of them!)
High achieving students also struggle
Bit fish in a small pond – the brightest kid in school until they get to LSE! Where the pond is full of big fish!
Andra
Format of the workshops
Interactive – we learnt from them as much as they learnt from us
Activity based
Quick wins where they learnt a digital skill
Meetings with students initially envisaged as focus groups
Then thought that rather than just seek information from students, should also provide development for students – 2 way
Andra
Andra
Andra
All participated in project in 2013/14 and keen to take part, paid for their time.
Andra’s comment: do we need this? It’s on the flyer in brief.
Jane
Impact is also mentioned in evaluation slides
Jane
Make the point that SADL contrasted to how they felt they were taught in general at LSE (sage on stage)
Jane
Make the point that SADL contrasted to how they felt they were taught in general at LSE (sage on stage)
Jane
Make the point that SADL contrasted to how they felt they were taught in general at LSE (sage on stage)
Jane
Jane
Jane do intro to V and R and hand over to Andra to do activity
Andra’s comment: I suggest just keeping one picture, the one with the drawings and make it bigger. Delete the one behind if Jane agrees.
Yes looks good – might be worth mentioning the JISC viewpoint cards as another way of evaluating a staff student project.
Andra
Students in general used institutional tools in visitor mode, including Moodle
Students engaged in resident mode with a variety of personal tools (Google, Facebook, personal email, WhatsApp, YouTube, Skype most popular)
Students (&staff) are less likely to use the same social media app for both personal / academic life
Should these tools be used for academic purposes to create more engagement?
Andra
Observable similarities with how student engaged with the programme – some more like visitors (went in for what they needed) and some like residents (wanted a community)