Everett CRMT show June10

COLLEGE READINESS AND MATH PLACEMENT— IS THERE A DIFFERENCE? (AND DOES IT MATTER?) Bill Moore Policy Associate, SBCTC Director, Transition Math Project (TMP) [email_address] 360-704-4346 “ Multiplying the Options” conference Everett Community College June 2010

SESSION OUTLINE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MATH PLACEMENT TESTING IN A “SEAMLESS” EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ,[object Object],[object Object],Historical Role New Role in K-20 System

KEY ISSUES/CONCERNS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MATH PLACEMENT TESTING IN WASHINGTON POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

NOTE: Practice problems/tests available on-line (through WAMAP.org) Not currently funded

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COLLEGE MATH PLACEMENT EFFORTS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

REDEFINING COLLEGE READINESS David Conley, prepared for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2007

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION EXAMPLES (OSPI) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

(http://www.wamap.org/index.php) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

MATH PLACEMENT TEST SAMPLE ITEMS

REACTIONS TO WAMAP & MPT TEST ITEMS?

CALIFORNIA MATHEMATICS DIAGNOSTIC TESTING PROJECT CLASS RESULTS School Instructor Course Test Date Test Type AR50/90 Number of Students: 25 Topic No. of Mastery Class Average Students at Code Items Level Score Percent Mastery DECM 9 6 4.6 51% 6 24% EQTN 6 4 3.2 53% 11 44% EXPS 5 3 2.7 54% 12 48% FRAC 9 6 4.2 47% 4 16% GEOM 10 7 5.0 50% 7 28% INTG 11 8 7.0 64% 12 48% ---- ---- ------ Total 50 26.7 53%

Everett CRMT show June10

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

En vedette

En vedette (11)

Similaire à Everett CRMT show June10

Similaire à Everett CRMT show June10 (20)

Plus de Bill Moore

Plus de Bill Moore (7)

Everett CRMT show June10