1. ‘
PUBLIC NOTICE
Thisis rebuttal tothe recklessputtingorallowedtobe puton or inthe internetbyJustia.com, about,
throughor withthe State of PennsylvaniaandUSA Governmentsknowledge suchfalse courtcase
informationabout StanleyE.Kornafel yetvoidof hispermission. Forthose havinginterestinMr.
Kornafel,,aswell astruth,moralsandmorallycorrectjustice the entity’s deceitful informationhas
damagedhisreputationandgoodname. The federal andstate judgesandcourtsin collusionwith
lawyersinconcertwiththe legal society andjustice departments arrivedatsuch writtenmattersby
denying Mr. Kornafel libertyanddenyinghim hissubstantialandcivil/constitutionalrightsusingdeceit,
coercion,fraud,lies,perjury aswell asdiscrimination andinderelictionof dutyandabsentjurisdiction
practiceddespotism.The judgesrobbinghimof anyreasonable formof morallyfairandethical equal
justice abortedall integrityof the courtsallowingthe courtsand lawyerspractice of fraudand extortion
of the client. The federal andstate congressesinbedwiththe legal societyjudgesandlawyersthrough
theirintentional negligence enablessuch ascommonpractice, thenwiththe complicity of the news
mediaitsdespotismandtyrannygalore inthe goodole USA. The followingprovides the truthof the
mattersregardingthe majorcases depicted.
U.S. DISTRICTCOURT,,,, No. 99- 6416………The memorandumisprejudiciallywritteninillegal legal
discriminationandfraud…
Note;;Atno time wasMr. Kornafel everprovidedanyformof reasonable fairandequal hearing
or trial where he couldenjoylibertytofreelyspeak hisfullcase andpresent filed legallyqualified
exhibitsof evidence thathadnotbeendisputednordisproved.
Pg.1, Background, par.1,lines1-2..is false perverting of truth….Truthtakenfrompolice report:
“ USPS struck plaintiff’svehicle”…….Lines2- 5,,isfraudbyomissionof truthful facts..Truth::USPSinitated
the claimby firstsendingtheirclaimform aswasrequestedbytheirownagent J.Michael DePompeo
whichwasfilledinanreturnedasinstructedbythe same agentat the scene….Omittedis thatthe two
estimates asadvisedbythe agentwere producedfromstate authorizedshopsandincludedwiththe
returnedUSPSclaimform…… Pg.2,, par. 1. Is fraud byrule of law as omittedtruthful factthatthe USPS
breachedtheirownagent’sdebate andcomprise withagreement andbindingconditionsattachedto
the agreementmade atthe scene.…Omittedalsoisthatthe USPSso calledofferwasbasedon
oppressioncombinedwiththeiruse of deceit,liesandfraudulentpractices…..par.2…isfalse asomitted
truth that the judge incollusionwiththe defendantdeniedandrefusedtoallow the prose to perfect
service…...par.3…isdeceitinomittingtrue factual matterthatthe lawyerinconspiracywiththe
defendantUSA andjudge betrayedthe client andtreacherouslyextortedthe client notperforming
normal professionalservicesagreedtoandexpected.The lawyervoidof cause failedtoobtain
statementsaswell asdepositionsfromthe three witnessesthen failedtoserve courtproduced
subpoenas and refusedtomake the scheduled courtappearance plusincollusionwiththe defendant
producedvoidof permissionunauthorizedandunsignedfraudulentstipulationforcomprise.…Also
omittedis thatthe case no. 1361 meritswas writtenandstatedas for negligence.asitwasnot a

2. propertydamage claim..….lines5-6,, isfalse intendedtodeceiveasthere wasneverany meetingof the
partiesnorwas there any hearingnorwas there any pretrial hearingnoranytrial of any kind.
Therefore anappeal wasimpossible sincethere wasno basis.Whereforethere wasno hearing, no
discussionand noargumentandno allowingof presentingof evidenceandwitnesses therewas no
decision. The citizenwastotallyrobbedof all libertyandjustice by the corruptedlegal societycollusive
iniquity of the judge andcourt…..Par.4- 5,,,isfalselymisleadingasthere wasnohearing.The citizenwas
deprivedof freedom asdenied of hisrightsof freely speakinghisfull case alongwithbeing deniedfrom
usinghislegallyqualifieddocumentsof exhibits forevidence…..AlsoomittedisJudge ONeill wassame
judge thatdeniedMr.Kornafel fromperfectingservice infirstprose action whichthenalsocolluded
withdefendantandlawyerinsecondactionwihlawyerasrepresentation…..The plaintiffknowingit was
the same judge knewconspiracy existedwhich made anyattemptatapproachingthe court sheerfolly.
Viable conspiracyandiniquityof judge andcourtwithdefendantandlawyeris clearly manifestedby
theiracceptingandallowingtobe filed the unauthorizedandunsignedcompromise voidof any notice
of any hearingwiththe plaintiff……Pg.3,,regardingthe standard;;;lawyer’sfiledcomplaintas
representationon behalf of clientaswell asthe fraudulentunsignedstipulationforcomprise are partof
the court’s record….Since there wasnomeetingof the partiesandnohearingandno testimony
therefore there wasnodecisionandtherefore no decision.Yetthere wasthe two documentsfiledas
mattersof court records.The judge Buckwalter havingaccess tosaidrecord anddocumentsestablishes
the judge’s prejudiced partisanfalsestatementsanddeceitasknew the plaintiff didhave setof facts
and exhibitsof documentedproof supportinghisclaim.The standardis meansof deceitinconcerted
activitycoveringupthe previousjudgesandlawyer……Pg.4to end…The background combinedwith
the standard crediblyevidences thatthe memorandumwas writtenin prejudicedcollusionintendedto
utterly robthe pro se of hislibertyandcivil rightswhile denying himanymeansof legallyentitledrelief
while denyingjustice.
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS,FEDERALCIRCUIT ,,,02- 5141,,,,Fed.Appx..651,2003…
Note: There wasneverany trial nor anyhearingor pretrial hearingof anykindmaintainingthe plaintiff
ina state of continuedbondage againsthiswill.The Discussionisfraudbylaw as omittingof critical to
decisionmakingmatters.OmittedisdefendantUSA had misledfederal districtcourtsasbeingthe
correct courts thenafterseveral yearsandcasesstatedthat the districtcourt wasthe wrong court,then
statedthat the claimscourt wasthe wrongcourt….If the districtcourts were the wrongcourtshow
couldjudgesacceptthe filings especiallywhenthe federal rulesof procedureidentifiedsame ascorrect.
The judge’s hereinwrittenmattershows the corrupted perversionof due process justice into
racketeeringmobrule soleytodenythe prose libertyaswell asfairand equal justice.
U.S. DISTRICTCOURT,,No. 03- 6876……Judge Giles,,,,Memorandum.
NOTE: At no time wasMr. Kornafel everallowedaccesstothe court, as he wasdeprivedof libertyand
deniedhisrighttobe present,deniedtospeak,deniedtobe heard,deniedtopresentthe fullcase,
deniedtopresentexhibitsof evidence,deniedtomake anyargumentanddeniedtomake anyrebuttal.
Backgrounnd: Perversionof truthandby law itis fraudas omissionsof critical factual matteryet
containingfalse statementsintendedtodeceive…..Lines1- 2 is falselystatedandfalse incontentaswas
not a collisionsince the USPSstruckthe plaintiff’svehicle onthe passengerside…Provenfalse bythe

3. police reportstatement andlawyerRepetto’s filedstatementincase 1361…..Lines 4,,,Omittedisthat
the USPS initiatedthe grievance claimbyfirstsendingthe plaintiff the USPSclaimformwhichthe agent
himself hadrequestedof whichthe victimmerelyfilleditinandreturneditasinstructedbythe USPS
agentat the scene of whichwasattachedtwo viable estimatesfromstate approvedshops. The victims
actionscompletedhispartof the agreedcompromise andpromise adhereingtothe agent’sattached
conditionsmade atthe scene……Lines 4- 5,,,,isfalse aswassuch documentationwas acknowledged as
receivedbythe USPSwriting……Lines 4- 5 isshownas false byjudge’s conflictingstatementin99- 6416
at pg. 1, of the lastline……Lines 5- 6,,,Is false byomissionsof factthat USPS subsequentactionswere
by deceitandfraudwhichisprovenbydocuments,,,,,,alsoomittedisthatthe vehiclewasa
discontinuedvintage classicmodel thatwascurrentlyinrestoration…….Line 7 isfalse asomittedisoffer
was made underoppressionandinfraudwhile omittingtheirbreadhof theiragent’s discussion,
comprise withconditionsandpromise whichwasestablishedatthe scene honoredandacteduponin
goodfaithby the victim……Lines7- 9,,isfraudby omissionsof fact that USPSdeniedthe claim
maintainingthe victimundercoercion……Lines7- 8 isprovenfalse by judge’sconflictingstatementin99-
6416, pg.2, lines2- 3…..Lines10- 12 are false presentedandfalse incontentintendedtodeceive.
Omittedisfactthat the judge inconspiracywiththe defendantdeniedandrefusedtoallow prose to
perfectservice…….pg.2, par.1,,, Fraud withintenttodeceive byomissionsof critical factsalong with
false statements..Repetto didnotnegotiateasthe original claimthatthe USPS agenthad alreadybeen
establishedandagreed toforthat amountwhichthe USPS laterrenignedanddenied.Where itwasthe
case wasnot aboutthe claimnorpropertydamage but as documentedbythe courtwas one of
negligence..Omittedisfactthat the lawerbetrayedthe client…Proof isthe lawyersclaimfiledonbehalf
of the client…thenfailedtoperformagreed tounderstoodasintended normal professional servicesas
failedtoobtainanystatementsfromthe three witnesses,failedtosecure anydepositionsfromthe
three witnessesandfailedtoserve the supoeanasasprovidedbythe courtthenrefusedtomake court
scheduledcourtdate appearance voidof cause leavingthe clientinaforcedfraudulentlyandcoerced
statedwhile extortingthe clientsfunds….Omittedisthatthe stipulationforcompromised filedvoidof
client’spermissionwithouthissignature andknowledge was false as contraryto the lawyers complaint
filedonbehalf of the clientpluscontained false statementsandnotagreedtoterms whichreducedthe
client/victimtoservitudeandbondage while nullifyingthe amount…..Conspiracybetweenjudge,
defendantUSA,andlawyerisprovenbythe same judge andcourt acceptingthe unauthorizedand
unsignedcomprise voidof anyhearing plus voidof anycontact withthe plaintiff requestingcause asto
whynot signedtoensure fairnessof whichthere wasnone……Pg.2,,par.3…( referalsotocase No.09-
06,,pg. 2,,topportionof page.) Paragraph isfraudintendedtodeceive byfalse statementandomission
of factsthat Mr. Kornafel hadfiledtimelyanswerwhichincludedexhibitsas well asthe notingof them
alongwith notingspecificallyof defendantsomissionsof critical matterandfalse statements,all of
whichthe judge didnotread and completelyignoredprejudicinganddiscriminating againstthe prose
reducingthe court to hisdespotism engineeringthe courtininiquity……Lines 8- 9…Omittedisthat
SuperiorCourtinintentional actionsdeprivedprose of libertyasdeniedhimhisrightof freedomto
freelyspeak,deniedhimtopresent hiscase,deniedhimtomake argument…The judgesutterly
practicedextortionasallowedthe court’sacceptingof paymentfor15 minute argumentwhichthe
judgesrobbedhimof bydenyinghisuse of hispaidfor time.The judgesabrogatedall jurisdiction
reducingthe court inconspiracywithdefendinglawyerinto itscorruptedracketeeringmob

4. actions…….par.4,,,simplyresonateswiththe same perversionof the systemtodenyjustice……Pg. 3,,
par. 1,, Lines4- 5..Anyimmunitywasdissolvedbyabortionof jurisdictionresultingfromcriminal
negligence. Judge Yohnknewpf existingcollusionthatrobbedprose of any reasonable fairandequal
due processjustice…..Pars.2- 5….Judge knew issuesof moralsandethicsinvolvedmeritsof deniedfair
and equal justice.Yetfurtherdeprivedthe prose by barringhimfromthe court , refusinghimfreedom
as denyhimto be presentandfreelyspeaktotestifytohisfull case andpresentall issues.Hisfailure to
act to correct by sendingthe case to eitherthe U.S. Supreme Ct.or back tothe lowercourtfor a jury
trial hearingevidencehiscomplicitytopervertjustice anddiscriminateagainstthe prose….Onthe
balance of the memorandumitisthat the combiningof the aforementionedof pages1,2, and 3
establishes pages4,5 and 6 of the memorandumisfalse,phony,deceitfulmatterputthroughpolicy,
hypocrisyasmeansof coveringupthe legal society’sturningthe systemintoamobracket…..Pg..5…Par.
1 alongwith2 evidencesthe judge failingtoprotectthe constitutionbyfailingtoprotectthe citizen’s
rights. The judge’suse of “final judgement”isnothinglessthanfraudintendedtodeceiveasthe citizen
was deprivedof libertyanddeniedhisfreedomrightsdeniedaccesstothe court and freelyspeakto
presenthisfull case andexhibitsof evidence abortingthe court’sequity. Since the meritsof the case
involvedconstitutional andsubstantial rightsviolationsthe judge andcourthadobligationtocompletely
reviewthe entire case mattersorhave the pro se testifyandgive hisfull statementof case. The judge
alsohad the optionsof forwardingthe entire case mattertothe U Refusal todo eitherpervertedthe
court intoprejudice anddiscriminationagainstthe prose reducinghimtoforcedbondage beyondhis
control as a meansof collusiontoprotectthe priorjudgesanddefendinglawyer.
Pa. Supreme Court….146MM 2007 incomplicitywiththe defendantandlowercourtrefusedtoallow
pro se to file aresponse todefendantandinbiasprejudice denied himtofile appeal voidof any
justification.
CLOSING
A personcan verifythese crediblefactshereinstatedalongwiththe full andcompletedetailedtruthby
goingto the variouscourts andreadingin depththat isall of the filingsaswell asfiledexhibitsof each
case alongwitheachand everyrelatedcase’smaterialsandfactthat has been fraudulentlyfailedto be
shown. Or a personmay envision all byobtainingacopyof the book, “Policy,Hypocracy,Despotism
and Tyranny,The Evil Injustice”atPublishAmerica.com/bookstore.
Of course once havingthe bookthe readerwill enjoybeing able tofullyrealize the intentionally
negligentfederalandstate congressesbeinginbedandcomplicity withthe legal societyjudgesand
lawyers readinghowthey allowsuch injusticetobe practiced.One may thenalsofind how the news

5. mediaisno longerthe free press thatnolongeroperateswith the citizen’sinterestasprimary since
alsobeinginbedwiththe lawyersandjudges.Take yourpick,,,mobrule ortyranny? Forthose
consideringuse of lawyersthe bookmayprovide agoodeducation.