Seismics and the City – Creating a Greater Christchurch – Envisioning. Engaging. Energising was held on 27th March 2015, Christchurch.
Earthquake Recovery Programme for the Natural Environment
This interactive workshop discussed the development and implementation of the earthquake recovery programme for the natural environment (NERP).
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 15, Article X: Wetland Conservation Areas
Programme Leader, Natural Environment Recovery Prog, ECAN - Speaking at Seismics and the City 2015
1. Planning for the recovery of the natural environment
following the Canterbury earthquakes
Chrissie Williams
Programme Leader
Natural Environment Recovery Programme
Seismics and the City
27 March 2015
First presented to the 7th Australasian Natural Hazards Management Conference,
September 2014
8. Assessment of
impacts
Land tilt
• change to
water
levels
Tidal inundation of saltmarsh
Salt-water inundation of freshwater
wetlands
Trees killed by salt water and high water table –1000+ trees removed
10. Avian Botulism outbreaks >10,000
water birds died in last 3 years
Assessment of
impacts
Secondary
effects
• Bird
populations
Redistribution of birds after
each major quake
Cliff failure on Banks Peninsula -
damage to seabird colonies
Spotted Shag
1996 = 22,000 pairs
2012 = 7700 pairs
Canada geese invading new habitat -
causing nuisance
17. Natural Environment Recovery Programme
Whakaara Taiao
Why? - is the Natural Environment important in recovery
How? - programme development
What? - is in the NERP?
What now? - implementation
How are we doing?
18. Why is the natural environment important
in recovery?
Well-being
Disaster risk reduction / management
Legislation
• Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002
• National CDEM Strategy
• Canterbury CDEM Group Plan
• Resource Management Act 1991
• Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011
• Recovery Strategy
Community expectation
20. Toitū te marae o Tāne
Toitū te marae o Tangaroa
Toitū te iwi
When the domain of Tāne and Tangoroa
are nurtured and sustained, so too will the
people prosper and flourish.
22. The Hyogo Framework for Action seeks to
“encourage the sustainable use and
management of ecosystems, including
through better land-use planning and
development activities to reduce risk and
vulnerabilities.”
It promotes the implementation of
“integrated environmental and natural
resource management approaches that
incorporate disaster risk reduction …”
25. Recovery Strategy
Natural Environment Recovery Goals
Restore the natural environment to support biodiversity and economic
prosperity and to reconnect people to the rivers, wetland and Port Hills – by:
• Ensuring recovery activities value, protect and sustainably manage the sources of
our water
• Ensuring ecosystems are healthy and functioning to support biodiversity and
economic growth
• Improving the quality and function of estuaries, waterways and wetlands to
support the unique biodiversity that is endemic to Te Waipounamu
• Providing safe public access to and opportunities for outdoor recreation,
cultural, social and economic activities
• Enhancing air quality through managing recovery activities that impact on air
quality, such as heating, transport, demolition and construction
• Storing, sorting and processing waste in an environmentally safe and effective
manner, including minimising and recycling construction and demolition wastes
26. Area covered by NERP
Greater Christchurch (as defined in CERAct 2011)
Focus on areas most affected
by the earthquakes
• coastal urban area
• lowland streams and rivers
• Port Hills
• Lyttelton Harbour/ Whakaraupō
27. Vulnerability
• Development near
coast, waterways
and on Port Hills
• Centralised
infrastructure
• Limited readiness
• Low local social
capital
Hazard
• Earthquake
• Liquefaction
• Lateral Spread
• Land tilt
• Rockfall
• Cliff collapse
• Landslide
• Flooding
Disaster
Risk=
Hazard x
Vulnerability
Reduce vulnerability
Increase resilience
Reduce exposure to the hazard
Disaster Risk Reduction / Management
Primary / Direct Effects Secondary / Indirect Effects Tertiary / Long-term Effects
Response Recovery
Response and Recovery
Assessment of impacts
Pressures
• Population
growth
• Urbanisation
• Environmental
degradation
Enhancement / Build Back Better
Reduce vulnerability/ Increase resilience
28. Disaster
Risk=
Hazard x
Vulnerability
Primary / Direct
Effects
Secondary /
Indirect Effects
Tertiary / Long-
term Effects
Response Recovery
Enhancement
Build Back Better
Reduce vulnerability
Increase resilience
Reduce exposure
Response and Recovery
Assessment of impacts
StatutoryFramework
Strategicpartnercollaboration
Communityinvolvement
Literaturesearch
How was the
programme
developed?
August2012–March2013
30. Canterbury Earthquake
Recovery Act
Natural
Environment
Recovery
Programme
Community organisations
Avon Ōtākaro Network
Eastern Vision,
Sport Canterbury
Soil and Health Association
Recovery
Strategy
Land Use
Recovery Plan
Lyttelton Port
Recovery Plan
Recovery
Plans and
Programmes
LGA
Greater
Christchurch
Urban
Development
Strategy
LTPs
Annual Plans
Strategies
Regional
Implementation
programme
Zone
Implementation
Programmes
Bylaws
Canterbury
Water
Management
Strategy
Regional
Policy
Statement
Regional
Coastal
Environment
Plan
NZ Coastal
Policy
Statement
Natural
Resources
Regional Plan
Proposed Land
and Water
Regional Plan
District Plans
RMA
Iwi
Management
Plan
CDEM
Act
Statutory Framework
31. Strategic partner collaboration
Community involvement
Technical Advisory Group
• Partner organisations
Community - stakeholders
• Community organisations/NGOs, Councils, Universities, Crown
Research Institutes, Consultants
• Stakeholder workshops October, 2012 December 2012 - facilitated
by ESR. Reports at www.ecan.govt.nz/nerp
34. NERP projects
17 projects:
• Actions
• Do nothing
• Prevent further damage
• Rehabilitate
• Take opportunities
• Increase resilience and sustainability
• Lead agencies and partners
• Timelines and priority
• Indicative costs
35. • Programme leader position
• 3-year contract
• jointly funded by ECan, CCC, WDC, SDC
• Quarterly reports on NERP progress
• Promote collaboration on projects
• Facilitate Technical Advisory Group
• Plan transition for after 2016
What now? - implementation
44. How are we doing?
? Speedy recovery legislation changed less community
consultation
? Avoiding development in hazardous areas - priority for
land for new housing
? Infrastructure - replacing ‘like-with-like’ - opportunity lost
for more sustainable and resilient systems
? Flood capacity vs ecological improvement
? Waste - reuse, recycling, separating waste at source
? Climate change and sea level rise
? Sustainable buildings
? Low impact design
45. So what? We should all…
Plan for recovery of the natural environment
before a disaster that
• is integrated with other recovery planning
• involves agencies and community
organisations
• anticipates the consequences of hazards on
ecosystems, and identifies options for
responding
• takes an integrated approach to disaster risk
reduction and ecosystems management
46. 1. Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority 2012. Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch
Mahere Haumanutanga o Waitaha. http://cdn.cera.govt.nz/sites/cera.govt.nz/files/common/recovery-
strategy-for-greater-christchurch.pdf
2. CCC and Environment Canterbury 2011a. Ecological effects of the Christchurch February
earthquake on our city rivers. http://ecan.govt.nz/publications/Reports/eq-effects-summary-river-
lowres.pdf
3. CCC and Environment Canterbury 2011b. Ecological effects of the Christchurch February
earthquake on our city estuary. http://ecan.govt.nz/publications/Reports/eq-effects-summary-estuary-
lowres.pdf
4. del Moral, R and Lawrence R. W. 2007. Environmental Disasters, Natural Recovery and Human
Responses. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
5. Folke, C., S.R. Carpenter, B.H. Walker, M. Scheffer, F.S. Chapin III, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience
Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society 15(4): 20
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
6. Godschalk, D.R. 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review.
4(3), 136-143.
7. Gunderson, L. 2010. Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural
disasters. Ecology and Society 15(2): 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art18/
References
47. 8. IRP and UNDP 2010. Guidance note on recovery: Environment
http://www.unisdr.org/files/16772_16772guidancenoteonrecoveryenvironm.pdf
9. IUCN 2006. Ecosystems, Livelihoods and Disasters: An integrated approach to disaster risk
management https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/CEM-004.pdf
10. Mainka, S. A., and J. McNeely. 2011. Ecosystem considerations for post disaster recovery: lessons from
China, Pakistan, and elsewhere for recovery planning in Haiti. Ecology and Society 16(1): 13.
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art13/
11. NZ Government 2011. Rena Long-term Environmental Recovery Plan.
http://mfe.govt.nz/publications/hazardous/rena-recovery/rena-long-term-environmental-plan.pdf
12. Renaud, F.G., Sudmeier-Rieux , K .and Estrella, M. (Editors) 2013. The Role of Ecosystems in
Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations University Press. http://unu.edu/publications/books/the-role-
of-ecosystems-in-disaster-risk-reduction.html#overview
13. UNEP 2008a. Environment and Disaster Risk: Emerging Perspectives.
http://www.unisdr.org/files/624_EnvironmentanddisasterriskNov08.pdf
14. UNEP2008b. Environmental Needs Assessment in Post-Disaster Situations: A Practical Guide
for Implementation http://postconflict.unep.ch/publications/UNEP_PDNA_draft.pdf
15. UNISDR Publications. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications
16. UNISDR 2005. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and
Communities to Disasters. http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf
References