Contenu connexe
Similaire à Shrm workplace-romance-findings update (20)
Shrm workplace-romance-findings update
- 2. Key Findings
• How common is workplace romance? One out of four (24%) employees reported they have been
or are currently involved in a workplace romance. Forty-three percent of HR professionals reported
current incidences of workplace romance at their organizations.
• Do organizations have a policy that addresses workplace romance? Overall, more than onehalf (54%) of organizations do not have a written or verbal policy that addresses workplace
romance. However, in 2013, an increasing number of organizations (42%) indicated having a
written or verbal policy compared with 2005 (25%).
• What types of workplace romance are not permitted? Among organizations that have workplace
romance policies, almost all (99%) indicated that romance between a supervisor and a direct report
is not permitted, followed by romance between employees of a significant rank difference (45%)
and between employees who report to the same supervisor (35%). Consequences for breaking an
organization’s workplace romance policy vary depending on the type of workplace romance and the
rank of employees.
• What consequences have been applied to employees involved in a workplace romance? The
most frequently reported consequence was a transfer of an employee involved in a workplace
romance to another department (34%) and counseling (32%).
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
2
- 3. Key Findings
• Why is workplace romance not permitted? When it comes to workplace romance, organizations
are primarily concerned about real or perceived favoritism (84%), potential for claims of sexual
harassment (78%), and potential for retaliation (72%).
» Concerns about potential retaliation increased from 50% in 2005 to 72% in 2013. Concerns
about lowered productivity and about workplace romances being viewed as unprofessional
decreased from 52% and 58% in 2005 to 29% and 29% in 2013.
» In the past five years, 40% of organizations have received complaints of favoritism from coworkers of those involved in a workplace romance; nearly one-fourth (23%) have received
claims of sexual harassment, and 22% have received complaints of retaliation.
• How is workplace romance revealed, and which departments are responsible for taking
action? Suspicions about workplace romance are generally revealed through office gossip (67%)
or through reports to the HR department (61%). Vast majority of organizations (89%) indicated that
the HR department is responsible for taking action when such suspicion or complaint comes to
light.
• What are HR professionals’ opinions about “love contracts”*? Only 5% of organizations ask
employees involved in a workplace romance to sign a “love contract.”* Although the majority (81%)
of HR professionals agree that love contracts can provide a forum for them to talk to employees
about appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior, 75% view them as ineffective because
employees may be more likely to hide their romantic relationships.
*In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship
is consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal
action against the employer or each other if the relationship ends.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
3
- 4. What do these findings mean for the HR profession?
• With workplace romance on the rise, HR professionals may need to prepare for more issues related
to managing its impact. For many organizations, the first step is to draft a written policy; more
organizations in 2013 have a written or verbal policy on workplace romance compared with 2005
(42% in 2013 versus 25% in 2005).
• In some cases, HR professionals may need to work with their risk management and/or legal team
colleagues to identify risks involved with workplace romance. The consequences can include
damage to office morale as well as legal claims that result from the relationship in
question. Depending on the business, these risks will influence any written policies.
• Currently, most HR professionals deem a “love contract”—a document that affirms the relationship
and is signed by the couple involved in a workplace romance—as ineffective and say that it actually
encourages workers to hide the relationship from peers. But this approach may be revisited if the
impact of workplace romance is seen as too damaging.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
4
- 6. Incidence of workplace romance
HR professionals: Are you aware of any
current incidences of workplace romance
at your organization?
Employees: Have you ever been or are
you currently involved in a workplace
romance?
I have been
involved
before
21%
Yes
43%
No
57%
I am
currently
involved
3%
No
76%
n = 405
Note: n = 5,004 U.S. employees. Employee data were
collected from the 2013 Employee Job Satisfaction
and Engagement Survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
6
- 7. In your opinion as an HR professional, have incidences of workplace
romance at your organization increased, stayed the same or decreased
in the past five years?
Increased
12%
Stayed the same
Decreased
67%
21%
n = 299
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
7
- 8. Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at
your organization?
Between employees in different departments
53%
Between employees of the same rank
32%
Between employees who are in the same department but
report to different supervisors
18%
Between employees when one or both have significant others
16%
Between employees who report to the same supervisor
12%
Between a supervisor and a direct report
8%
Between employees of a significant rank difference
8%
Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this
question.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
8
- 9. Which of the following types of workplace romance are most common at
your organization? (continued)
Between employees who work on the same projects
8%
Between an employee and a client/customer
Between an employee and a vendor
Between an employee of your organization and an
employee from a competitor organization
Other
*No workplace romance was observed
7%
5%
3%
4%
7%
Note: n = 522. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was developed from
open-ended responses. Respondents were allowed to select up to three responses for this question.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
9
- 11. Does your organization have a policy that addresses workplace
romance?
36%
A written policy
18%
6%
A verbal policy
2013 (n = 555)
7%
2005 (n = 491)
54%
No written or verbal policy
72%
Don’t know
5%
2%
Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
11
- 12. Which of the following types of workplace romance are not permitted at
your organization?
Types of workplace romance
2013 (n = 209)
2005 (n = 127)
2001 (n = 78)
Between a supervisor and a direct report
99%
80%
64%
Between employees of a significant rank difference
45%
16%
12%
Between employees who report to the same supervisor
35%
13%
15%
Between an employee and a client/customer
31%
13%
18%
Between employees who work on the same projects
25%
6%
12%
Between employees who work in the same department but
report to different supervisors
22%
24%
31%
Between an employee and a vendor
21%
4%
6%
Between employees in different departments
12%
*
*
Between an employee of our organization and an employee
from a competitor organization
11%
4%
4%
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Respondents whose organizations do not have written or verbal policies on
workplace romance were excluded from this analysis. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013 survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
12
- 13. What consequences do employees face when a supervisor and his or
her direct report break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?
48%
Counseling
41%
44%
A formal written reprimand
29%
41%
Termination
22%
40%
A transfer to another department
within the organization
51%
29%
*Removal from supervisory position
Supervisor (n = 281)
26%
A move to another position
within the department
Suspension
There are no official consequences
Direct report (n = 265)
39%
23%
12%
22%
24%
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to
supervisors.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
13
- 14. What consequences do employees face when those of a significant rank
difference break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?
56%
A formal written reprimand
36%
48%
Counseling
42%
47%
Termination
Suspension
22%
32%
16%
28%
A transfer to another department
within the organization
45%
25%
A move to another position
within the department
*Demotion
There are no official consequences
33%
Higher-ranking
employee (n = 104)
Lower-ranking
employee (n = 92)
14%
17%
24%
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in relation to
higher-ranking employees.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
14
- 15. What consequences do employees face when those who report to the
same supervisor break your organization’s policy and are involved in a
workplace romance?
A transfer to another department
within the organization
56%
A formal written reprimand
34%
Counseling
33%
Termination
20%
Suspension
Other
18%
5%
There are no official consequences
27%
Note: n = 98. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
15
- 16. In the past five years, which of the following consequences have been
applied to any of the employees involved in a workplace romance?
Consequences
2013 (n = 343)
2005 (n = 134)
2001 (n = 108)
A transfer to another department within the organization
34%
42%
55%
Counseling
32%
34%
30%
A formal written reprimand
21%
36%
31%
Termination
20%
27%
35%
A move to another position within the department
20%
*
*
A removal from a supervisory position
12%
7%
7%
Suspension
8%
*
*
Other
6%
18%
11%
None of the above
34%
*
*
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only included in the 2013 survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
16
- 17. Generally, how did employees involved in the romance react to the
consequences?
They accepted the decision
80%
They did not accept the decision and
left the organization
8%
They did not accept the decision and
took legal action against the
organization
3%
They did not accept the decision and
appealed it
2%
Other
7%
n = 219
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
17
- 18. Generally, how are suspicions or complaints about workplace romance
revealed at your organization?
Through gossip in the office
67%
Reported to the HR department
61%
Reported to the supervisor of those involved in
the romance
33%
Reported anonymously (e.g., through
organization's ethics hotline)
25%
Reported to the leader of the business unit
under which the romance occurred
Reported to the internal/external legal counsel
Other
23%
3%
4%
n = 392
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
18
- 19. If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a workplace romance between
employees at your organization, who is responsible for taking action?
HR department
89%
Supervisor of those involved in the
romance
39%
Leader of the business unit under which
the romance occurred
Internal legal counsel
24%
8%
External legal counsel
5%
Other
4%
n = 411
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
19
- 20. If there is a suspicion or a complaint about a possible workplace
romance between employees at your organization, what measures are
taken?
73%
Talk to employees involved
58%
Talk to the supervisor/leader of those involved
in the romance
60%
45%
45%
47%
Look for problematic behavior
Monitor conflict among co-workers
32%
31%
Monitor productivity of employees
28%
33%
Talk to co-workers of those involved in the
romance
23%
19%
Monitor correspondence between suspected
employees (e.g., e-mails, texts)
Support the relationship (e.g., allow common
vacations)
Nothing/no measures taken
18%
13%
Supervisor-direct
report romance
(n = 350)
Other types of
romance (n = 296)
7%
21%
16%
25%
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
20
- 21. Does your organization offer training to employees on how to manage
workplace romance?
Yes, for all employees
Yes, for managers only
No
10%
8%
81%
Note: n = 389. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
21
- 23. Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization?
84%
*Concerns about real or perceived favoritism by
co-workers of those involved in the romance
78%
Potential for claims of sexual harassment
77%
72%
Potential for retaliation if the romance ends
50%
57%
*Potential for legal action taken against the organization
2013 (n = 312)
2005 (n = 103)
56%
*Potential for inappropriate sharing of confidential
information between those involved in the romance
47%
*Concerns about gossip/distraction among co-workers
Concerns about lowered morale of co-workers
of those involved in the romance
30%
44%
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
23
- 24. Why is workplace romance not permitted at your organization?
(continued)
30%
*Concerns about lowered productivity of co-workers
of those involved in the romance
29%
Concerns about lowered productivity of those
involved in the romance
52%
29%
Workplace romances are viewed as unprofessional
58%
24%
*Concerns about lowered employee engagement of
co-workers of those involved in the romance
2013 (n = 312)
2005 (n = 103)
19%
*Concerns about public display of affection of
those involved in the romance
18%
*Damage to organization's public image as a result
of exposed romance
Other
6%
8%
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
24
- 25. In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your
organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees?
2013 (n = 327)
2005 (n = 472)
2001 (n = 468)
70%
*
*
51%
62%
66%
40%
44%
46%
Divorce/ending of long-term relationship with significant other
30%
*
*
Decreased productivity by those involved in the romance
24%
26%
41%
Claims of sexual harassment
23%
19%
26%
Complaints of retaliation when the romance ended
22%
15%
26%
20%
*
*
18%
25%
24%
17%
16%
19%
Gossip/distraction among co-workers
Those involved in the romance got married or became
long-term partners
Complaints of favoritism from co-workers of those involved in
the romance
Inappropriate sharing of confidential information between those
involved in the romance
Decreased morale of co-workers of those involved in the
romance
Complaints of stalking when the romance ended
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
25
- 26. In the past five years, have any of the following occurred at your
organization as a result of a workplace romance between employees?
(continued)
2013 (n = 327)
2005 (n = 472)
2001 (n = 468)
15%
*
*
14%
*
*
13%
*
*
6%
*
*
6%
6%
7%
3%
*
*
3%
*
*
Increased productivity by those involved in the romance
2%
5%
9%
Increase in workplace violence
2%
3%
4%
Increased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the
romance
1%
*
*
Other
5%
13%
10%
Complaints from co-workers of those involved in the romance
about public display of affection
Decreased productivity by co-workers of those involved in the
romance
Decreased employee engagement of co-workers of those
involved in the romance
Legal action was taken against the organization
Increased morale of co-workers of those involved
in the romance
Increased employee engagement of co-workers of those
involved in the romance
Organization's public image was damaged as a result of
exposed romance
Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. An asterisk (*) indicates that this response option was only provided in the 2013
survey.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
26
- 27. In your opinion as an HR professional, should employers have the right
to prohibit workplace romance between employees?
Yes
32%
Depends on the
situation
49%
No
18%
Note: n = 385. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. More than one-half of respondents who selected “depends on the situation” indicated
that employers should have the right to prohibit workplace romances between a supervisor and a direct report.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
27
- 28. In your opinion as an HR professional, which types of workplace
romance should be restricted and/or acted upon by organizations?
Romance between a supervisor and a direct report
95%
Romance between employees of a significant
rank difference
54%
Romance between an employee and a client/customer
44%
Romance between an employee and a vendor
33%
Romance between employees in the same department
33%
Romance between employees who report to the
same supervisor
Romance between an employee of our organization and
an employee from a competitor organization
Romance between employees who work on
the same projects
Romance between employees who work in the same
department but report to different supervisors
Romance between employees in different departments
Other
30%
24%
23%
17%
8%
4%
n = 398
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
28
- 29. Does your organization ask employees involved in a workplace romance
to sign a “love contract”?
In this survey, a “love contract” refers to a document affirming that a workplace romantic relationship is
consensual, that employees involved will not engage in favoritism, and that neither will take any legal action
against the employer or each other if the relationship ends.
Yes
5%
No
95%
n = 371
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
29
- 30. In your opinion as an HR professional, do you agree with the following
statements related to “love contracts”?
Love contracts provide a forum to talk to employees about
appropriate and inappropriate workplace behavior
81%
Love contracts are ineffective because employees may be
more likely to hide their romantic relationships
75%
Love contracts are effective in protecting the organization
against legal action
34%
61%
Love contracts are effective in decreasing risk of sexual
harassment claims
58%
49%
Love contracts are an invasion of employees' privacy
Love contracts are not necessary and create additional
paperwork
Agree
25%
66%
Love contracts put HR professionals in an awkward position
Love contracts are effective in reducing perceived favoritism
by co-workers
19%
46%
41%
39%
42%
51%
54%
59%
Disagree
n = 290
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
30
- 32. Demographics: Organization Industry
Percentage
Professional, scientific and technical services
18%
Health care and social assistance
16%
Manufacturing
15%
Government agencies
10%
Finance and insurance
10%
Educational services
7%
Retail trade
7%
Transportation and warehousing
7%
Information
6%
Construction
5%
Utilities
4%
Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
32
- 33. Demographics: Organization Industry (continued)
Percentage
Accommodation and food services
3%
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction
3%
Religious, grant-making, civic, professional and similar organizations
3%
Wholesale trade
3%
Repair and maintenance
2%
Real estate and rental and leasing
2%
Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services
1%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting
1%
Arts, entertainment and recreation
1%
Personal and laundry services
1%
Other industry
5%
Note: n = 384. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
33
- 35. Demographics: Organization Staff Size
1 to 99 employees
24%
100 to 499 employees
33%
500 to 2,499 employees
21%
2,500 to 24,999 employees
25,000 or more employees
16%
6%
n = 384
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
35
- 36. Demographics: Other
Does your organization have U.S.based operations (business units) only,
or does it operate multinationally?
U.S.-based operations only
Multinational operations
74%%
26%
Single-unit organization: An organization in
which the location and the organization are
one and the same.
31%
Multi-unit organization: An organization that
has more than one location.
69%
n = 400
n = 399
What is the HR department/function for
which you responded for throughout this
survey?
Corporate (companywide)
64%
Business unit/division
15%
Facility/location
21%
n = 285
Is your organization a single-unit organization or
a multi-unit organization?
For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and
practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters,
by each work location or by both?
Multi-unit headquarters determines HR
policies and practices
54%
Each work location determines HR policies
and practices
2%
A combination of both the work location and
the multi-unit headquarters determines HR
policies and practices
44%
n = 283
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
36
- 37. SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Workplace Romance
Survey Methodology
• Response rate = 13%
• 384 HR professionals from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this
survey
• Margin of error +/- 5%
• Survey fielded July 9-26, 2013
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
37
- 38. About SHRM Research
For more survey/poll findings, visit shrm.org/surveys
For more information about SHRM’s Customized Research
Services, visit shrm.org/customizedresearch
Follow us on Twitter @SHRM_Research
Project leader:
Yan Dong, research intern, SHRM Research
Project contributors:
Alexander Alonso, Ph.D., SPHR, vice president, SHRM Research
Evren Esen, manager, Survey Research Center, SHRM Research
Copy editor:
Katya Scanlan, SHRM Knowledge Center
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
38
- 39. About SHRM
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest
association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than
260,000 members in over 140 countries, the Society serves the needs of HR
professionals and advances the interests of the HR profession. Founded in 1948,
SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary
offices in China and India.
Workplace Romance Survey ©SHRM 2013
39