3 responses to

3 Responses to "Illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in
India…"
Mangesh chakole Rating:
said this on 02 Sep 2010 8:22:11 AM CDT
the topic is very excellent ...we need to discuss this topic ..because its a global topic ...as a
indian citizen we need to look into it ...the government should take the strict action regarding
the bang immigrants...because its afterall about the distructing the integrity of our nation..and
if we dont get worry about such situations then the time will not be away when there are the
chances that we could loose our independence because we are already suffering a lot due to
the terrorist acts and if this devils get assosiate with each other then there can be a greatest
threat to our nation.
(Reply to this comment)

Mangesh Chakole Rating:
the very important thing is that the gov should try to improve the relationship with the bang
because if we want to go global and if we think regarding the globalization then it is must to
take the other countries along with u and u should try best to improve the relations with the
neibouring country as we have always been trying to do with the pak..but if the matter is not
in hand then the strict measures are need to be taken because nowadays the the bang
activities are increasing ....

deepa Rating:
said this on 09 Dec 2011 1:56:07 PM CDT
I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again. Visit shilpbazaar dot com
Excellent topic to discuss.

NINNU Rating:
said this on 15 Jan 2010 1:00:46 PM CDT
We cant say womens r better managers bt we can say womens r more successful
managers.From their childhood,they are teached to manage small-small things 4m their
wadrobes to kitchen to organisations.Management lies in the blood of womens,thus they can
manage better than a men.4 a men,its a duty n responsibility to get succed n to get fame-
name-money,bt 4 a women it is a part of life.

UTSAV Rating:
said this on 25 Aug 2010 10:37:40 PM CDT
I do not agree with ninnu. women cannot become good manager,B'Z they are very
emotional. and manager requires must be control it's emotions i.e becomes emotional
inteligent; and this qualitiy have in men only. so, men can do that do not can do by
women; B'Z there are lot of difference between manage family and manage company.

soniya Rating:
i m totally disagree with utsav for example soniya gandhi who is managing our country
not imotionlly she has a power n skills no doubt women managers can be better
managers

snigdha Rating:
said this on 01 Sep 2010 5:52:22 PM CDT
Women as a manager are much more successful and better than man.There is a long list
of women who hav set flags in d area of managing.Reason women are
laborious,serious toward their goals.As far as emotions is concerned there exist no
human in d world who hav no emotions, and If there exist such living beings den they
are animals.Even animals too hav emotions.Managing skills require prpper blending of
all d qualities and emotion is one of its ingrediant Managing is all about d proper
utlilization of resources. and If u know dat U r gud manager.Women are much skilled
in managing ,they think from all d angles,they are sincere ,serious .

surendra kumar rakse Rating:
this is absolutely rediculus, this is not truth, i accept that in comparision to men, most of the
women are sincere but only in quantity, i.e. in large number, you see that in iim's and iit's
most of the seats are filled by men, thats why men are more intellegent than women, in term
of management still women are behind, women can only be a good manager, when she is a
good human being, not jeleous of men, because I saw that women when gets a position, she
missuse it, she just think that, in this male schavenist country, she got a way to make men a
looser.

ANURAG Rating:
said this on 03 Feb 2010 10:40:26 AM CDT
yes its true they feel jealous but it not only found in women it can be found even inside
men. I agree to some extent wat you said but i think NINNU had thrown the light on
chracteristics found in INDIA thus women from similar culture are said to be born
managers. Now if we talk about Corporate world they are getting jobs on basis of looks as
well as there management as they can easily solve conflicts as compared to men. Lady
bridge in conflicts make conflicts solve easier thus reduces complexity. Even for
managing tasks which requires less intelligency they are ahead of us.So wat you said of
jealousy is not excepted.

dipti Rating:
said this on 05 Feb 2010 8:20:06 PM CDT
pathetic response.first of all, its scientifically proven that men n women have equal
brains.infact women have 6th sense n have an edge over men.management means art of
managing people & women are well equipped with this art.secondly, men's level of
jealously goes upto killing his enemy.you are diverging frm the topic.

deepak kuntal Rating:
said this on 24 Mar 2012 8:30:12 AM CDT
i liked your reply dipti,what do u do and where do u live?

midi Rating:
there is always the hand of a woman behind the success a man .and women are more
responsible and have managerial capability than men .they never misuse their position
u can see the example of our president mrs.pritiba patil ,Indra Gandhi they alwys
thought aboutthe development of our country. the development of india dont depend on
only men. If both work together and give their best then our india will be on the highest
peak of the growth

sakshi Rating:
said this on 02 Mar 2011 11:46:26 PM CDT
ur comment in itself shows that how much jealous u r with girls progress...because of
people like women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance
women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are the only place to judge mens
superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur level so u
thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r misusing ur
right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature not her.....i
hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist

sakshi Rating:
people like women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance
women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are the only place to judge mens
superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur level so u
thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r misusing ur
right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature not her.....i
hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist

sakshi Rating:
people like U women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance
women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are not the only place to judge
mens superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur
level so u thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r
misusing ur right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature
not her.....i hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist(Surendar kumar)

Satyajit Rating:

said this on 20 Oct 2011 5:08:11 PM CDT
wonderful view

surendra kumar rakse Rating:
said this on 27 May 2012 10:09:57 PM CDT
please ignore this para, thank you

Anu Rating:
i agree to all the girls above. it is always said behind every successful man der is woman ,
why do dey say dat , der must be some reason behind that phrase. men and women are equal
in evry way . presently women are m0re hard working and successfullya said by midi.
Earlier women were not given a chance to show their talent n now dey r .

Rasik Rating:
said this on 27 Apr 2010 7:05:36 AM CDT
Yeah i feel women could turn out to be better managers than men having given them
chance to do so.....they could challenge us equally in every field.There are some mis-
conceptions that we do't find much girls in mba colleges as compared to boys..the reason
is they are encouraged to have early marriage which is more valid if we take the case of
our country,india.And regarding your statement Anu "Behind every successful man there
is women" i do not agree with this but yeah we could work together then we could do
better as compared to doing it alone.

sudha Rating:
i think surendra is not right,she has some personal renenge from womenn,nd the language is
also very abusive in respect to a women.

devendra Rating:
said this on 19 Apr 2010 3:48:58 PM CDT
I think skills and qualities are not respective to any sex.These are born as well as
developed.Therefore there is no need to quarrel on this topic. Both are excellent managers as
it depends upon the person.

Midhun Rating:
Guys, The topic is "Are women managers better managers…" and not "Are women
managers better managers THAN men…"

arun Rating:
said this on 02 May 2010 10:07:24 AM CDT
i do not agree this topic because women has not suitable for this job....besides man nd

women both r equal mind skills and other capablities..bt some work r only for specific
gender.men already know that how to do work from other.women r only for clerical job not
for managing job..men r concious regarding his job..so we can say that managing job only
for men's not for women's

archana Rating:
said this on 09 Jul 2010 2:14:30 PM CDT
m not agree with aruns' opinion because we hv seen so many examples of managing job
that women r doing in our country like CEO indira nooyi ,kiran mazumdar shaw chairman
& MD of biocon ltd, Ritu Kumar Fashion Designer.... etc etc all these women are leaders
in their respective field.so making statement like "women r only for clerical job not for
managing job" is ridiculous.

pradeep reddy Rating:
this thing called a job suitable for only a particular gender is not an existing thing in world
well common man it is proved already that any job a man can do ,can be done by a woman
too and so come the woman manager so ,and only if the person has good leader ship qualities
,a team player enough a woman can perfectly do it and we can see Chanda Kochar CEO of
ICICI bank

golu Rating:
hello frnz according to me women s good managers but cant say that better then men ok
first of all we should have clear sight that managing in different field is different task if
some people think that management in home is the only management then it is wrong i
guess. although women are good in home coz there she have to manage her home only but
one can easily think that a family without man suffers lots than a family without woman
for managing household works women are good but for issues of outside home there need
a man to solve them now in corporate world women are also doing good but as compare to
men they have less guts coz the society is men society .and if we talk about fact and
figures there is no need to compate that how big managers are men and how are women.
and if somebody above saying that it is proved that women and men have same mine then
it is not correct coz women are good scholars coz they have theoretical mind , they can
cramp things easily but if we talk about practical mind or technical mind boys have more
both cases have exceptions . so at last we can say that women are good managers and they
are rising rapidly but we cant say that they are better than men managers

bhavitha Rating:
Well this topic seems to be some what different because how come sincerity and successes
depend on a gender. Successes depends on person and his contribution to the work and the
organization it do sent depend whether a women or men leading the team i depends how
good a person is in extracting the work from his/her subordinates.

Raviranjan kumar singh Rating:
I think both contain the equal brain and no one can tale that who is excellent in the particular
field of management. It's a very fact that women to be much serious than men towards her
goal if she get the right opportunity but It's also the fact that men also contain an excellent
brain.. . it also depends upon the specific field of the management. both can do the best. it
also depend upon the caliber and the smartness of mind . exception exist every were

Divya N. Rating:
Skills do not depend upon gender. I hardly disagree with those stating that women can be
better managers; or those stating the contrary. If one is dedicated towards his/her goals in life
then there is nothing standing the way between that person and his/her goals. Reaching your
goals is also a management in its own way. Women today are no far less off than men. Indra
Nooyi, CEO of Pepsico, Chanda Kochar, CEO of ICICI Bank - it clearly shows how good
women with men by their side.

Divya N. Rating:
Skills do not depend upon gender. I hardly disagree with those stating that women can be
better managers; or those stating the contrary. If one is dedicated towards his/her goals in life
then there is nothing standing the way between that person and his/her goals. Reaching your
goals is also a management in its own way. Women today are no far less off than men. Indra
Nooyi, CEO of Pepsico, Chanda Kochar, CEO of ICICI Bank - it clearly shows how good
women with men by their side.

sarah Rating:
THE HAND THAT ROCKS THE CRADLE RULES THE WORLD !

Raj Rating:
I agree with ninnu that women are born manager and they have excellent skills to manage. i
don't agree with utsav that women are very emotional and can bring problems on the
contrary they get very rigid to do ''what must be done'' after they get a experience of in that
field but one thing is sure that men are ahead of women in some ways that the women
manager cann't handle the their female colleague as men can handle they get very easily
jealous of there colleague. They also have a demerit especially in India that they have to
carry household chores which leave them very less time in day to day activity which leave
them with a few innovations in management unlike there other counterpart outside india. I
believe if given equal oppertunity to women with men they certainly have a edge over men
i feel that the issues regarding global warming are catching everyone eyes these days... so
jobs like energy conservation measures are the ones to be looked out for

Raviranjan kumar singh Rating:

Bpo/kpo will be the upcoming profession more than the other sectors because all categories
are required for this if the common thing communication skill is good. we also know that
after globalization due to bpo/kpo our economy condition and unemployment maintain more
than the previous season.

Pallavi Rating:
I believe science research based profession and also legal based profession will be the
upcoming professions as our country currently to go ahead need innovation and to protect
them we need the legalhelp in terms of Intellectual property rights .

Jaleel Hasfar Rating:
Surely Science will not be. Contact me, If you will be in 2020. Thanks. +91-9003203040

Sana Rating:
How dare u'll put ur mobile no.

Swayam Rating:
said this on 17 Jan 2011 10:28:20 AM CDT
I think things are changing day by day.software related jobs,jobs related with human life(as
biotech.,micrebio.,genetics etc) and the jobs which implements modern science(like
nanotechnology,research in medicine etc.).but if we looks through previous decades we
could see the basic jobs like teaching, scientist, doctoring, engineering etc never faced a
saturation.I think in future also these jobs will give us a better future.

siva Rating:
superbbbbbbbb

Jaleel Hasfar Rating:
Aircraft, Civil, Electrical and Architectural will lead the world. I think those four disciplines
in Engineering will never get any upset in future. Source: Future Profession, Internet. Ph:
+91-9003203040. Thanks All

dsw vouchers Rating:
Great site you have here but I was curious if you knew of any message boards that cover the
same topics discussed here? I'd really love to be a part of online community where I can get
opinions from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any

recommendations, please let me know. Thanks!

reverse phone number Rating:
said this on 29 Jul 2012 12:10:27 AM CDT
There are a few interesting points soon enough in this posting but I do not recognize if I see
all of themcenter to heart. There is some validity but Ill take hold opinion until I consider it
further. Good writeup , thanks and then we want much more! Added to FeedBurner at the
same time

Do you think India is the biggest victim of Financial Crisis

By Moderator ..
Published 02/11/2010
National Group Discussion topics
Rating:

There are some arguments that India is not a victim of recession. These lines turned as illusions
according to United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) survey. United
nations estimates that financial crisis hit India and make Indians lively hood worse.

Spread The Word
del.icio.us it
Digg this
Furl
Reddit
Yahoo! this!
StumbleUpon
Google Bookmarks
Live Favorites
Technorati

15 Responses to "Do you think India is the biggest victim
of Financial Crisis"
zubi Rating:


According to me india is not one amongst those countries which were severly affected by what we
call global recession , it offcourse has some effects but upto some extent , the main reason for this

is the policies which were done by the central government to handle such a pressure situation...


reghuramsreedharan Rating:


according to my view i will not agree with th statement.i dont think that,our central govt
seriously taken that as a danger and manmohan's govt effectevely over come that situation


Monodeep Rating:


according to my point of view indian govt shold think for the general and poor customer and as well
as middle level customer and handle the situation in such a way so that indian economy remain
stronger and the price of daily use essential commoditis be in reach of general customer.


RIMIT Rating:


exactly iam totaly agree govt shud think about the middle level at certain time here was some
recession,govt tried to tackle that but thier policies were not enough!!!


Surya Prakash Chaudhary Rating:

said this on 01 Jun 2010 11:19:22 AM CDT

up to a little extent am agree with you but i think that we common people are much responsible
towards the government policies. if we don't waste our resourses with proper management then
schenario would be different


PARUL Rating:


NOT EXACTLY , AS THIS GLOBAL RECUSSION HAS TREMENDIOUS IMPACT ON DEVELOPED COUNTRY
ALSO LIKE UNITED STATES .ALTHOUGH INDIA CAN NOT BE KEEP APART FROM THIS CRISES BUT
CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT BEYONED CONTROL. GOVT HAS IMPLEMENTED REFORMS STRATEGIES
THAT HELPS TO TACKLE THE CONDITION TO SOME EXTENT. EVEN INDIA HAS PROVIDED RELIEF TO
DEVELOPED COUNTRY BY PROVIDINDG FUNDS TO WORLD BANK.


saranya natarajan Rating:

said this on 03 Jun 2010 2:13:07 PM CDT

as per my view in our country preference should be given to the poor pupil. even though the govt
offers many thing which ll be helpful to the poor but it doesnt reach the poor because of the
irresponsible officials which makes the poor more poorer.


wert Rating:


as per my view in our country preference should be given to the poor pupil. even though the govt
offers many thing which ll be helpful to the poor but it doesnt reach the poor because of the
irresponsible officials which makes the poor more poorer.


Bandana Rating:


Yes i am quite satisfy with you because every coin has two faces.Like as there is irresponsible
officials activity but a part of that if some poor pupil got the benefits, they still want to sit and
wait for the next helpful steps they dont want to grown up there situation so,i think both party
should be responsible.


shabnam Rating:


yes exactly govt. has taken sevearl steps to overcome the situation n helpful hand to poor but its
not reaching to them...govt should take care that there help must reach to poor


Richa Arora Rating:


Inequalities of Income has religiously been a part of India. So the Global Recession has not hit
India in that aspect as much as in other aspects. Because it originated in US the effects that have
cascaded are more in terms of International Business getting affectewherein the
outsourcedbusiness is being lost by India. Acc ording to me the worst hit is US not INDIA.


Sudha Rating:


Its about how govt is handling the sitaution and how public is accepting it. But now a days no
politician is bothered about people or country. And about recession - yes it affected india , cant say
if it was more or less. As many people from bpo were fired and were not getting any jobs.


sidhartha sankar parida Rating:


in my point of view the main cause behind economic crisis is insincerity of workers,the selfish
thinking of politicians and the misunderstanding between govt. and public.i agree with the
statement that india is suffering very much by crisis.because ,since it is not a highly developed
country,and most of the Indian population depends upon govt and private services hence they get
affected during crisis.


kumarmanohar Rating:


ya ,mainly in India IT Industries which are globalised and other just started growing for global
standards have much impact of recession because people from India who recruited in USA had
faced the recession effect and packed back to INDIA.so ,Manily IT Industries tasted deep the effect
of recession


raj Rating:

said this on 22 Nov 2011 6:13:43 AM CDT

i agree that it industries are mainly affected by the recession. but india is able to save himself from
the recession.Now india is able to help others country like USA to over come from the situation.
india is still register growth in this critical situation. it is a strong point consider.

Effect Of Western Culture On Indian Youth

By Moderator ..
Published 04/2/2006
GD TOPICS WITH ANSWERS
Rating:

” Effect Of Western Culture On Indian Youth "
Replies:

Posted By: pavani

How there is head and tail for a coin, there is both positive and negative impact of
western culture on India and especially on Indian youth,

In past in India men were our traditional dresses, but now it is entirely changed, now
the Indian youth moving with jeans, t-shirts, minis, micros, etc., here we can proud of that
western culture, it bringing us with the fast moving world.

But when we consider the pubs, it is the thing to be strictly punished. In pubs both
men and women are in drastic stage, by taking drugs, it should be punished. And we need to
felt sorry for that.

And there r many things to be taken from the western culture.

Posted By: navedkhan05

THERE HAS BEEN AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF EFFECT OF WESTERN
CULTURE ON US. IT CAN BE EASILY FELT BY THE FOOD, ATTIRE AND WAY OF
LIVING OF CITIZENS.SPECIALLY ON DRESSES IT HAS MADE ADVERSE EFFECTS. SO
IT IS NOT GOOD FOR OUR CULTURE.OUR YOUNG GIRLS ARE WEARING SKIRTS,
MICROS, AND MINIS ETC. WHICH EXCITES THE BOYS LEADING TO SOME SERIOUS
CRIMES SUCH AS RAPE ETC. BUT ON THE FLIPPER SIDE THE WAYS OF LIVING HAS
BEEN GREATLY ENHANCED WHICH IS GOOD FOR SUCCESS AND GROWTH OF THE
COUNTRY AND HELPFUL FOR IT IN HEADING TOWARDS SUPER POWER AHEAD OF
USA. SO I FEEL THAT IT HAS BOTH GOOD AND BAD EFFECTS

Posted By: ulty

I Strongly believe that there is a substantial influence of western culture on Indian
youths. Mere mention of the word 'India' signifies a place of cultural heritage as well as
diversity. But the cultural legacy that we are showing to the whole world is becoming a thing
of history in metropolitan cities.

On one side we enjoy our so-called rich culture and really admire it but on the other
side we find discotheques full of young guys and girls. Secondly, Joint family tradition; one
of the biggest assets of India is now vanishing under the shadow of the so-called western
culture. Nuclear families are taking place of many years' old values. Youth of today is more
interested in their privacy rather than enjoying their lives with others. Individualization has
broken up the joint family system, paving way for the youth to fall prey to drug addiction.
This stage is the most vulnerable period of life where the youth need guidance, counseling,
education and care by parents.

So how did we get part of their culture over here, you ask, their culture has become
over popularized here, through electronic media that everyone wants to be just like them.
Because of that India has lost her identity from all other countries. We’ve now become a copy
– cat to all other nations and we may lose our individuality. The reason is because, we want
another image, we don’t want to be the olden – day - traditional country, which still hasn’t
become the so - called ‘modern’, even in the 21st century. We don’t want to look like
imposters to all other well – developed countries. If you have ever thought of that, erase that
thought because the image we’ve got planted in our minds is terribly wrong. India is not an
imposter to other nations, it never has been, but will if the people of today continue to do
everything they see on cable TV.

India is an independent country now and has been for a while, with no such
problems. The reason behind that is because our ancestors fought for us, so that we could
have a future in our own way, not with any other way, which we are not used to. I’m not
saying that India should stop everything they’ve learnt from western countries, but to have
some individuality from other nations and to set an example to the other 3rd world countries
and give out the message that there are other nations to set an example on.

So, for the people who fought for us, for India to keep her dignity and to be a leader to
other countries, we the people of today must be our own country and not be some other
country, which we’re not. Everyone is his or her own countryman - why can’t we be our own
as well?

Should the public sector be privatized?

By Moderator .
Published 03/24/2006
GD TOPICS WITH ANSWERS
Rating:

Should the public sector be privatized?
Replies:

Posted By: meenakshisekar

Yes of course privatization of public sectors leads to some healthy changes in an org. b's
when you take public sectors u can find some slackness (or a little bit) delay in their services.
But in case of private since service is there first and foremost duty they act rapidly.

Posted By: ssrkraju

Hi All,

Privatization of public sector. Lot depends of which sector we are talking about. Let
me clarify few doubts in the primary stage. Can we expect all private hospitals in our cities in
our town which do not have an entry for poor people, can we have only private sector
telephone companies, can we have private companies have complete control on oil reserves,
can we have all transport be provided by private sector and RTC vanishes, can we expect an
private sector to take care of our defense. In the same way we cant expect the government to
set up an IT industry on its own, we cant expect them to handle all the load of flight
transport. My point over here is both are not mutually exclusive. We need to accept the fact
that both are here to stay and we cannot make it without one. They do have their importance
and we need to deal this issue according to the context.

There are some strategic sectors, which need to be under control of Indian government like
oil/gas sector. The subsidy we enjoy will be never provided by a private sector. The
government in this case helps its citizens to a great extent and making them available to its
citizens. The ration card system is a great boon to the poor. Coming to some sectors like steel
and mobile where both are present and a healthy competition among them always benefits
the customers. It is also a point to be noted that Government itself cannot take the complete
load just like it cant take the load of all flight customers where private sector is playing its
helping role. Then there is education sector, which also has good competition with CBSE
matching with any education system of either state syllabus or the schools coming up with
their own syllabus. The public transport sector too is a mix of public and private and here
you can see a striking difference. You can easily differentiate the profit motive of private
personal whose salaries depend on the profit to their owner. In autos you can see some 6-8
people are dumped then starts the engine. I do accept that some services are best in private
sector as they fear their job loss and their owners do get the best out of them by making them
to work more no. Of hours.

The lazy mindset of some public sector could be taken into account to convert it to a private
sector. I would like to suggest that counseling sessions for these to have a better future by
working for the organization would help it to grow better and be under the public sector
umbrella. We can take some examples by some of our previous strategies, which helped us to
renovate dull companies, which lacked in performance. If a private individual is going to buy
the company and could change its fortunes, why can't the public government do it? It can.
Running away from a trouble is not a solution. Facing it head-on will produce better results.

Posted By: mallika_pillai

I totally agree with Mr.ssrkraju.... As he said it depends on which sector we are talking
about. And both have a different importance of their own. Privatization has its own proms
and public sector have their own. I think both needs to be there as far today’s development is
concerned.

Taking the view it is right that the work at public sectors is not working the way it
should. But if everyone understands the responsibilities then it can also work the same way
as private sectors. Again I think for some sectors it is ok otherwise it should be done by the
respected ones itself...

POST YOUR VIEWS ON THIS TOPIC ......

Spread The Word
del.icio.us it
Digg this
Furl
Reddit
Yahoo! this!
StumbleUpon
Google Bookmarks
Live Favorites
Technorati

Related Articles

Indian villages - our strength or our weakness?
VALENTIN E'S DAY!! Advantages & Disadvantages along with your opinion
What ails Indian sports?
Infosys placement paper 37
Infosys placement paper - 15
Indian villages-our strength or our weakness?
Quality is a myth in India.
How green was my valley..Are we paying the price of nature?
Indian customs-are we in a time warp?
US war on Iraq-justified or not
Foreign Television Channels are destroying our culture

Bush trip to India - Advantages & Disadvantages

164 Responses to "Should the public sector be
privatized?"
yamendra Rating:


good


Harshit Jain Rating:

said this on 09 Aug 2008 11:37:17 AM CDT

Well friends, as we all know that most of the government units are known for their poor service
level, that is why the private organisations are came in picture and even making huge profits out
of the same customer base. The basic reason behind is the level of understanding, it means the
junior level, middle level and the senior level management are not as much sharp or I should say
not as professional as the private sector's all the level of management. Even the environment of
the organisation is also matters. By this point i just want to say that at each level of an
organisation there should be an educated and highly professional person needs to be there. If we
look at the features responsible for the success of private organisations we came to know that
they at every level of management you will find a highly qualified and professional manager, and
they set-up all the problems at their own level, so it is nothing but the power dilution and even
the highest authority is wholly responsible for all the actions taken at every level of management.


Rasik Rating:


Yea i agree with you,but if we take case of india..80% of the population is rural so they will be
able to afford to get operated in private hospitals.We need to improve our public service
facilities and all that is needed is govt. to take a step forword so that we can expect better in
future.So lots of pts needs to be considered before privatising market.


nikhil Rating:


this is the fact in rural area.people cant afford to pay


Nupur Rastogi Rating:


hello friends, In my opinion,its depend on which sector to be privatised.Because if we talk
about private hospitals a poor or a middle person cannot afford their medical services.But
its true that good quality of services are provided by private sectors as compared to pubkic
sector. Even some people who are working in public sector use rough language to the
customers which is very bad.And in private sectors customers are treated in a very good
manner and grievances are handled in quickly also.


anupma gupta Rating:


i am agree with Nupur Rastogi b/c it have given the best exp to differentiate between them.it
is true that private sector have good facility for all thing bt i cant ignore to public sector b/c
many of the poor person who have no money for mediciene they take the help to public
sector.so i think both are important in own position


Nutan Rating:


i also agry with this point,both public & private scetors are important to their position


tara Rating:


good


Dinesh Rating:


Well friends, privtation is a very contentious issue. Just take the example of Private Hospitals, ther
poor cant even think of getting a treatment there and if we do make all hospitals private then I can
for sure say the people will die for treatment. And about the Power Industry, if its privatised, we are
sure to get proper power supply but with increased rate per unit. The people of India made a huge
hue and cry about the increasing petrol price and if the electricty rate are increased then look at the
reaction.


dhanasekar Rating:


nice


mayank Rating:


well i totally agree with what dinesh said...its not about getting anything privatised...but its about
how to deal with with the public sector enterprises. It is always benificial to have private sector
units in a country but as we are still a progressing nation where still more than 30% of the
population is below poverty line,will it be ethical to think just of profit.I think it will not be fair
enough for the people who can not afford to pay for it. public sector units shall not be privatised
only what needs to be checked out is management.


madhuri goel Rating:


well said mayank


pooja Rating:


I am not agreed on this piont completely Government sector is known for its red tapism and
corruption.Dealing withthe govt. officers will definately bind you to go door to door.but on
the other side , private sector is dignified for its efficient managment and for making the best
use of resources. for aspiring to be a devloped country , there is neeed for having a effective
managment strategy as we have a sufficient means and human resources like any developed
nation but need to make best use of it. In every budget , a large sum of money is alloted to
government department but because of dormant and unoptimistic attitute of people , there is
a very little impact on our economy.so if we can transformed this scenrio by aillance with
private sector and if we have to pay a liitle a bit more for this then it does not matter.


Amit Kumar Rating:


Well said pooja ,I agree with you what you have said ,but one thing I want to clear that
private sector make all the things easier ,at the cost of what ? the answer is money ,at
present scenario 70% people live in villages and they are not capable enough to spend
huge money.suppose Train ,Hospitals,schools,colleges all become private then where
these 70% people will go.By making all the sector private we just separating the India into
two group i.e rich group and poor group .The thing is that India is still developing
country.All we will need to do is that we have to stay unified and support Government to
provide us best facilities .who make the Government definitely we ,then we have to faith
on it.Once we allow to breed the private sector in full swing then we are completely in
clutch of them and our freedom are lost.On the other hand I am not totally disagree that
private sector is bad.The thing is that we need to have better administrator who have
capability to manage the resource properly.


ranjeetkaur Rating:


m agree with amit....as he said what will happen to 70% of people of our nation if every

sector gets privatised,if it happens then how the poor people, who even today think
about their 2 times meal,will survive? bcoz after privatisation of every sector,prices of
all things will definitely go up.we can think of privatisation but only after our nation
becomes developed.Need of hour is what that all of us must aware of our duties and
we must do every work dedicatedly so that even if we are working in a public
sector,people believe on the services of public sector.


siva sankar Rating:


Well said pooja ,but we can not privatize all the sectors for getting the best outcome
because we have to take the decisions which are helping to the people of India .Then
only our developing India will become developed one.I feel the better solution is we
have to appoint a some Intelligent private committee for checking the working of Govt
sector.Based on those results we will take appropriate actions.By coming to Hospt
sector we have to give some rankings the Hospitals.Then there is healthy competition
in Hospitals like IITs in Indian Educational System.


akanksha bahety Rating:


well said pooja...m agree wid u..sooner or later one has to move on to private sector
for better services which are not provided by public sector


payal Rating:


countrys development depends on individual development.. if everything goes
privatised how will the bpl population sustain further as 40%of the population is BPL.
so its govt, management to be developed once this goes our country will reach its
desired goal.. and private gives you wealth and takes ur health!!! u will have for each
rupee u f=get from it ie u need to play the role of a slave in a private sector.... where as
for public sector u can have a budget along with healthy relations...


pooja Rating:


I am agreed on this piont completely Government sector is known for its red tapism
and corruption.Dealing withthe govt. officers will definately bind you to go door to
door.but on the other side , private sector is dignified for its efficient managment and
for making the best use of resources. for aspiring to be a devloped country , there is
neeed for having a effective managment strategy as we have a sufficient means and
human resources like any developed nation but need to make best use of it. In every
budget , a large sum of money is alloted to government department but because of
dormant and unoptimistic attitute of people , there is a very little impact on our
economy.so if we can transformed this scenrio by aillance with private sector and if we
have to pay a liitle a bit more for this then it does not matter.


nikhil Rating:


actually the current situation is meangfully describe by pooja.


P K MAHATO Rating:


i am totaly agree with this statement. but it should be done on sansad.


anita Rating:


ya pooja u r right.but as our country India is a poor country.there are many people under
poverty. so they can not afford the services given by the private sectors. so according to
my point of view private sectors r not bad but all public sectors like hospitals,

schools,transport should not be privatized.


arun Rating:


very good


shama Rating:


i agree with mayank......


pratibha Rating:


i agree with u very nice ..


cHJhdGliaGE=pratibha Rating:


i agree with dinesh if there is priatisation is done then there only loss of those peoples who r
not able to pay.i thought that it's not right.


shubh singh Rating:


hi.. Friends. i totally agree with the comment given by the dinesh.. if privatization is done in
every sector then this will really going to create big problem as normal or the poor people

can't survive in private sector.. n this will lead to change in the govt..and again the election
will be conducted which result in the missuses of the fund deposited n the fraud politician can
again fill their pocket n enjoy the situation.. so again here the poor people will become the
target n they hv to face the problem.. so ,i think in our country its time to keep both the
sectors working mutually in order to balance the situation n condition..


payal Rating:


i agreee with u dinesh coz if inflation occurs in case of hospitals the death rate would increase
to such an extent such that we will not be able to control but we need to have some private
and few govt. sectors but it ll be helpful for the poor..


tehzeeb Rating:


i agree that public sector should be privatised..in private sector all things are handled more
efficiently and effectively..more money is earned in case of private setor..hence we can hope to
increase our salary i.e. average salary of the country will markedly increase..which we can say to an
extent that our country will develop at a faster rate..hospitals if privatised will result in better
medical care..even if it is perceived as more costly as compared to govt. sectors..then let me give
you an overview of things which are managed in hospitals...a patient if is poor is not dealt with
utmost care and attention..is treated like a lowly thing...but had the patient been well off or had
ministerial contacts then he will be given full care with all possible facilities..then wat is the use of
public sector handling various institutions????


prity Rating:


no i think that public company should not be privatised because in public company there is
mostly provisions for poor people but in private no relationship with poor.and in private sector
company all the money are gathered at a place bt in public sector its spread among the public.
our india is poor country so first we think about to remove the poverty of our country before
anything.


akhil Rating:


excellent


anuj rana Rating:


i m fully agree with u n wants to add tht privatisation also increase employment ,working
efficiency....


hari Rating:


it is good


sirisha Rating:


sir ur info is excellent.but i advice u to put the keypoints as first.bcaz if we want to search it takes
too much of time.so plz give key with as possible as short. thanks for give us this info bye


S.Anusha Rating:


IT WILL BE USEFUL IF SOME MORE POINTS ARE DISCUSSED UNDER THIS TOPIC


trimplek Rating:


hi...i would like to add to all the above points discussed above whatever sector v talk about is not
self sufficient. when we talk about raising of funds in such sectors...not all companies are in a
position to raise money through public....hence, banking sector plays the most imp role here
when funds r concerned every industry is dependent on it and vice-versa. in todays scenerio
definitely i agree that public or nationalised banks are at a deterioriting stage but not all( eg: SBI,
BoB, ) almost all banks have now realised the imp of services marketing and r working on it after
facing threat from foriegn banks.one can't expect the most imp resource i.e. capital to be in the
private or foreign hands.just for the purpose of growth of individual co's the entire economy
cannot be handed over to the private sector.there should be a fair blend of private n public
undertaking.


Harshit Jain Rating:


Well my dear friend if you are talking about the public sector banks then let me tell they have
the poorest management including SBI, as an evidence we can look at the growth rate, you
will find that the private sector banks are growing at the higher rate then the public sector
banks, and the day is not very far when private bank surpass the public sector banks, if they
do not wake up now.......it will be very late. Even before some days you must have found the
news that SBI is going to recruit 20,000 employees, but let me tell you it is gonna be a flop
idea, cause the people they recruiting are either 12th standard passed or graduate only, the
new era requires people having business intelligence, and believe me you will find the same
thing that i am telling you.


shilpa Rating:


yes, my dear friend you are right and i agreed with your views..today we need private
sectors so much because there are more efficient people are worked with more efficiency
like SBI well now the recuirtement seat is grower and be 25000..and everyone 12th passed
individual can feel this form..so this is not so much good for public sectors and we should

need private sectors..


VIJAY SINGH Rating:


WELL SIR,YOUR COMMENT ON PRIVATE AS WELL AS ON PUBLIC SECTER IS GOOD ENOUGH BUT IT
WILL BE MORE BENEFICIAL IF U ADD SOME DATA MATERIALS.I AM FULLY AGREE WITH UR POINT
THAT BEFORE TALKING ABOUT PRIVATIZATION THE VERY FIRST THING WE SHOULD DISCUSS IS THE
SECTORS WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH.AS OFFCOURSE ALL THE SECTORS CAN'T BE PRIVATIZED AS
IT WOULDN'T BE A SAFE DEAL.


Divya Rating:


Any topic given in GD is in such a way that anyone can say its good in either way depending on the
context.So what I think is its not good to say that privatization or public sector depends on the
context. It shows that you are not confident enough to take a decision


ankit tomar Rating:


i think a man need a direction for getting success,everbody works hard but it will not produce
favourable result until our efforts are well directed towards the target.so this material will help a lot


laal Rating:


dear ankit.. in case study u go with positive and negative both points..so whatever he said is good
enough for a GD, as case study is a part of GD


jayagayathri Rating:


better


Anand Rating:


yes i completly agree with mr.ssrkraju that privtization is not necessary in every sector.can you
emagine when railway,airlines,oil componies and electricity will be privatised that time the cost of
every thing will be incresed unbelivable and every indians will be suffered more.


pallavi srivastav Rating:


hi Privtation.....its sound very attractive.bt in India if you privtatise thn you hv to make all ppl
employed with good salary.Bt inIndia its tk time or nt going to b hapn.if all public sector b privatise
thn autimatically theafting,murder corpuction e.t.c will increase. n i dont thnk ppl want this.


Mohammed Aleemuddin Rating:


It was gud .everyone communicated verywell on the topic but including of some more pts will be
beneficial for aspirants.Thanx bye


ashutosh Rating:


Hii, everyone, as my friend ssrkraju has said can v have private telecom companies n all n all, i would

like to inform u Relience is private company recently Mr. Mukesh Ambani has established a
petrochemical plant which is the second largest plant in the world.......n nt dat much only he also
steped into a vegetable market....u must b aware wid the fact n figures how the price of petrol is
increasing under goverment but Relience petrol pumps are providing petrols on much cheaper
rate......Mukesh has said when he wz there in Bang. on opening of vegetable mall there he
said...vegetable rates r Fluctuating now a days bt it will not make any difference to this mall...here
price will be same in all the situations.... now my point is nowa days private companies r providing
much more facilities as compared to govermental


niyas Rating:


yes i entirely agree with mr.ssrkraju that privtization is not important in every sector. it is very
usefull to freshers when they read it.thankyou


deepak Rating:


good one it was helpful


Jyoti Prakash Das Rating:


Good Topic


sandeep Rating:


good discussion


mridul jain Rating:


i think privatization is very good for our country, coz in private companies employes give their 100%.


krishna Rating:


i strongly agree with mridul jain but every sector should not be privatized. some sectors which
should require the devolopment they should be privatized


mayank Rating:


well mridul i would like to make a remark on your comment that in private companies the
employees give their 100% for sure...but rather than giving 100%,more than 100% of them is
taken out at the cost of handful of salary.Needless to say employees over there are made to be
worked for more than 12 hours a day to achive their goal for the day.this is givin terrible
consequences..divorces hav increased as couples are not able to spend time with each other
under sever work pressure.Many new diseases have came into existence..all these consequences
themselves say the story no need to comment that public sector is the favourite.


bhagyashree Rating:


Well mayank i do agree with wat u said........ its true that privatisation may give good outputs
n dat would b fast enough but not now....i mean v r still a developing nation...majority of d
peple r poor n they do rely on public sectors for their needs....i think tat both of these sectors
r equally important....they r both strong enough to improve the current position of India...the
only need is that they work properly,take gud decisions on behalf of the company,the peple
of India as well as on behalf of the nation inorder to make it another developed nation on the
globe............


abhishek rathi Rating:


I agree with mayank on above points but let me tell u that it is the employee who is accepting
& willing to work & thats why he is being paid lumpsum amount. also thr is no requirement ki
u need 2 work for more than 12 hours. U are required to finish a task in quality manner & u
do it asap. U get promotion. n every coin has two sides. If u expect money,fame, u have to
devote time & even this happens wid couples. As u spend time u get closer. n performance
matters. Privatisation helps to get things faster,smoothly. U talk of banking sector, tel;ecom,
insurance,oil & what not,& govt is also thinking of privatising many sectors. for eg SAIL,
moil,oilindia etc. So its the need to privatise public sectors. however, defense should not be
done so...


swati Rating:


yup! its ok.but not as good as 1st one is. some more posts must be on it.as earier keerthi wrote well,
here should b some thing like.. .whatsoever it was ok.


bhushan Rating:


i am fully agree with Mr. tehzeeb, there should be privatization in public sector,if we talk about the
current scenario all the private companies count the value of money and time,while in public sector
people are lazy(but they have good knowledge),they dont want to utilize the time and money. only
privatization can change there mindset if we talk about the poor people,there are lots of hospitals
and social organizations which provide help to these people In crux privatization is the best way for
countries growth


siluvaivendan s Rating:


usefull


ashwin zade Rating:


Well friends, I think that selected public sectors should be privatized. The major sectors like
railways, oil& natural gas, mining etc. should be kept public. This is because these sectors belong
equally to all citizen of India,because they use the natural resources of India, over which every
citizen has equal right. Private sectors are primarily driven by profit motive. They may not think of
public welfare. Second thing is that , if all the public sectors are privatized , then we must see that
market forces keep the price affordable.We must also ensure that monopoly doesn't occur. Finally, I
think that from economically well settled citizen's point of view,privatization should take place.
Because he may get better services. But seeing from poor citizen's point of view, he has public
sector services as last ray of hope(e.g. hospitals, education,ration, etc.) Majority of indian
population(30-40%) belongs to below poverty line.So, in that way, I think that at present time, not
all public sectors should be privatized.


Amit Rating:

said this on 03 Oct 2007 12:18:42 AM CDT

hello everyone all u said that's true but privatisation is necessary but there is some extent in
privatisation many mncs are coming to india and they earn profit for there own so it is beneficial but
up to some extent


ginni bajaj Rating:


before privatisation of the public sector we should not only consider only few sectors and give
decision for the whole . as told telecom in private hands is perfectly all right as we all k now that
reliance was the first one to lanch mobiles for rs 500 and call rates 40p all over india , so it depends
on sectors


aleesha Rating:


well i think privitazation is definetly gonna help us in boomin up with the salary system n will
improve the standars of living . but we should not forget dat publc sectors are unavoidable .. as one
of the person has stated a very valid point about ration card systems. private sectors have a
competing tendency n dey move along wid the flow whr as the publis sector is more concerned
bopt the nation in whole n has to luk after the very need of all the category of ppl..


MITTU-ICFAI Rating:


it is good why because we know importance of privatisation through last 5 years development
privatization will give effective production then we can get more revenue then automatically the
share share of the organization will grow you take simple example government hospital and private
hospitals in india the peoples are observe a lot of difference so friend i would like to conclude that
privatization of governemtn organization is important


Ashish/Abhijit Rating:


well the topic is good for discussion but the discussion depends on the different sectors.


Asim Rating:


Just remember that three people will not change the fate of India. Also if India looses its public
sector to the private players how will the country get money and income from which is used by the
low class people in the country. Then the only thing that is left with India is to increase the tax rates
or watch the country in the hands of private players and enjoy the profits which should be in the
hands of 'JANTA'.


srikanth Rating:


many of them saying conversion public sector to private sector some extent it is good but it is not
possiable because if each and every compay, organization is privatisied it make trobules to poor
people. There are some strategic sectors, which need to be under control of Indian government like
oil/gas sector. if this sector is privatisied we will never get the subsidy and this enjoyment never
provided by a private sector. The government in this case helps its citizens to a great extent and
making them available to its citizens.as like telecom companies in india facing computation because
of that we r getting cheply high level products this one is good. take example of hospitals if it is
privitized poor people definitely face trobule


ruby and sandhya Rating:


all the public sector companies should not be privatised becoz if all the private companies are set up
with a profit motive and 30-40% of people are below poverty line..so the public companies keeps
the ethics in mind...take eg of railways,electricity,hospitals for poor if they are privatised..


jayesh Rating:


Hello, Hasnt public private partenerships increased over the period of time? Rajiv Gandhi, the
visionary behind opening up economy gave a green signal to private players. Hitherto, in
infrastrucutre alone India has witnessed 86 PPP deals and over $51bn has been poured into the
sector. WHat we need is development, and it has to come FAST. Pvt ltd should be approached for
exploiting their core competencies and experiences. We dont want 100% privatisition since it would
have no regulatory / governing body, which could at times go against public favor as it is happening
in case of organised retail where even pvt player are bound to affect a set of community. Imagine
the situation where for eg a company like reliance would be free to sel gas all over india without any
governance/partnership ? or Sify/hathway dominating broadband space without existence of VSNL
which ensure that public intrests are safeguarded? SO hving pvt players all over would never make a
sense especialy in sensitive sectors like defence, DRDO etc..They should be set up where synergies r
bounnd to be achieved


ravi Rating:


i agree at this point. public sectors should be privitised. in the public sectors 90 persent of the
people are sitting idle. in some public sectror companies employees are playing cards. this
generation is rapidly moving to the sky. so we think that work hard and get sucess in the work. then
only over nation flag is will high and high. so we should work hard. in public sectors there is work
but they cant do work since there is no boss and no dead lines if there is a dead lines also they are
taking a simple. learning and implimentation is not possible in the public sectors. so in the past days
most of the doctors and engineers indians are settle in us and other countries, since here there is no
grouth. if it is a privitisation there is a some ristriction. so compulsory work hard. and think, learn
some thing, implementing something and achive a new things, so that in the w


Faiyaz Rating:


Its true totally public sector is not converted into private sector Bcoz different sector has diffrent
pons and cons which different level or category of the people. we don't forget that India is rich but
Indian are poor. these poor Indian has go for only in the public sector bcoz there are coming in
poverty line. so i can say only that once u get the privatized the sector its increase the economy
growth but poverty line people will suffer wch is huge in number....


shyam awasthi Rating:


it's ok only private sector is providing good services,even public sectors org is providing good
services we cann't forget S.B.I bank,ONGC,BSNL ETC.these companies providing beeter facility .


simran Rating:


hi to all, acc to me privatization of public sector will be very benificial nt only to org but also to the
people. coz as v all know very well the diff bet the service provided by gov hospital and a private
hospital .. there is lot of issues in gov sectors which cant be solved there is no one who is deeply
interested in development of gov sector so if they r organised in a better way they will be a boon to
the socity otherwise it is better to privatize them


yogita Rating:


IT IS VERY WELL SAID THAT DECISIONS LIKE THIS ARE TO BE TAKEN WITH PROPER CONSIDERATION
OF THE IMPACT WHICH IT WILL HAVE ON POLITICAL, ECONOMICAL, SOCIAL,TECHNOLOGICAL AND
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE COUNTRY. A INDIAN ECONOMY IS NOT WORKING IN A VACUUM, IT
NEEDS THE SUPPORT OF PRIVATE PLAYERS AND THE GOVERNMENT. WE CAN'T UNDERESTIMATE
THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC SECTORS AS THEY ARE THE NATION BUILDING FORCES.
HOWEVER, WE CAN'T OVERESTIMATE THE ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTORS, AS THEY ARE WORKING JUST
FOR PROFITS. NO DOUBT PRIVATE PLAYERS ARE MORE ENERGETIC AND ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT
THEIR SUCESS BUT IT WON'T BE TOO MUCH TO SAY THAT THEY CAN OVERLOOK THE NATION'S
CONCERN OVER THERE OWN. SO AT THIS MOMENT WE AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA, HAVE TO SHOW
OUR ZEAL TO MAKE OUR COUNTRY A DEVELOPED NATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BY EXPLOATING
ALL THE OPPORTUNITIES WEATHER IT IS BY PRIVATISING SOME OF OUR KEY SECTORS.


NIR4ANJAN KUMAR SINGH Rating:


All the private sector should be privatised


priya Rating:


this topic is very nice and all d ppl gave very good conclusions...


sahana Rating:

said this on 05 Nov 2007 12:10:22 PM CDT

well i think we need to look into the competencies of both public n private sectors.. public sectors
are designed to serve all the citizens may it poor middle class or upper class... private sectors
wherein promise a higher standard service... i think we need to motivate the public sector to
improvise the way they are functioning...so that it will help in overall development of the nation.
instead of commenting and creating the perception that public sectors(SARKARI) are not a serious
affair .. we need to create awareness and encourage the public run institutions to perform better.
so its not necessary that we have to privatise all the public institutions(sectors)


priya Rating:


thanx for provinding this kind of stuff. i m sure this is going to help me a lot and i can also get
massive knowladge out of it. thanx once again


GaganpreetKharbanda Rating:


Yes I appreciate most of the comments,I agree on this that Depending upon the sectors private and
public identity can be given,One thing for the sure when we talk of privatization its the best in
Todays scenario thereby leading to growth of world economy, meeting the standard of life of
people of India,why we people are poor due to un employment, which private companies are
providing nowin comparison to public enterprises,To quote an example, Be it Reliance, Bharti , or
aditya Birla Group,with the onset of retail merchandising, things will be improved further, thereby
decreasing the costs leading to price wars waiving the involvement of middleman(real earners) and
providing everything under one roof,so anyways coming up of Reliance retails, Pharma, Walmart is
beneficial for the development of or country keeping in prespective the development of mankind
Thanks to share with you all


kshitish Rating:


well i think we need to look into the competencies of both public n private sectors.. public sectors
are designed to serve all the citizens may it poor middle class or upper class... private sectors
wherein promise a higher standard service... i think we need to motivate the public sector to
improvise the way they are functioning...so that it will help in overall development of the nation.
instead of commenting and creating the perception that public sectors(SARKARI) are not a serious
affair .. we need to create awareness and encourage the public run institutions to perform better


sarmisti Rating:

said this on 04 Dec 2007 5:07:01 AM CDT

yes my friends has told very valid points then wat is the need of LPG If itis privitized there will be
Value for every thing (money ,time,eforts ) One more thing i would like share with u friends
"SOMEBODY CANT DO EVERYTHING BUT EVERYBODY CAN DO SOMETHING" So we will
together(govt &private) can enjoy taste of the success. thanq for giving me this oppurtunity to share
my feelings with thanq bye


abdul Rating:


Acc,raju there r few sectors which should not be privitised but even govt is taking necessary steps to
give its best service.the attitude/feeling of people on public sectors should change for example
hospitals private hospitals cannot reach to rural villages,and govt is inviting private sectors to serve
people for better service.Any how we have a right to use public sectors (ex:rtc)under certain offers
(ex:student pass)which cannot be given by the private sector at all.So it is a responsibility of a citizen
to use public sectors and take part in the development of the organisation


abdul Rating:


Acc,raju there r few sectors which should not be privitised but even govt is taking necessary steps to
give its best service.the attitude/feeling of people on public sectors should change for example
hospitals private hospitals cannot reach to rural villages,and govt is inviting private sectors to serve
people for better service.Any how we have a right to use public sectors (ex:rtc)under certain offers
(ex:student pass)which cannot be given by the private sector at all.So it is a responsibility of a citizen

to use public sectors and take part in the development of the organisation


A.N.Hemamalini Rating:


Hi everyone,i say that eventhough there is both gov. and priv. sectors both r running for us with
some benefits and with some difficults but anyway gov. buses r providing free pass for students,but
which the priv. sectors not do so...........


Nachiketa Gupta Rating:


both private and publice sector is two side of coin. country can not think development to left any
one sector. both are neccessary u cant say all public sector should be privatised if it is happen than
govt. lost his power.first we have to know for which sector we have talking about like we can not
give defence and railways to private sector because they are more in profit making rather than
serving to peoples but sick unit of public sector which goes in losses we privatise them.


vinit Rating:


I think, all of the articles have been good from discussion point of view. What I feel is, making a
public sector privatized has different different things to be considered. It has some good as well as
bad depending on the type of industry you are going to make private. If you look at oil services and
LPG gas services, if they will be privatized it will be too costly for a middleman to bear the burden of
these without subsidies provided by the govt. Presence of a govt company into the market also
controls the prices and regulates the market. Basic facilities like water and electricity are the ones
which are good only when in hand of government because govt is not going to think about profit
only. It will also think about the future of that and will provide subsidies if needed. But the other
services like telecom services, automobile services and IT services are good in hand of private sector
firm because they will compete in this field and even they will have to keep their prices low at the
same time as they are not the basic needs of a person because if prices are too high, a middle man
can cut down the consumption of these services. The only way to come ahead will be quality and
low cost so public sector except the sector for basic requirements of the country should be
privatized which will result in far better situation of country. Let me take an example if all the

hospitals are being privatized, will every person of India be able to get the health care services? Will
he be able to survive in this situation? So there is no point in sectors related to basic services being
privatized.


priyanka Rating:


the points placed by everyone is correct acc to them. i to agree with most of my frens that not all
but some public sectors which needs help from private sectors,whici are not efficient enough to
serve the public should be given in the hands of private comp so that the services provided to public
are improved.....


shantanu purwar Rating:


i favour and also disfavour this comment,when we are talking of services in less cost or subsidies
then public sector should be followed.But in case of development like in field of
IT,Industries,exports and imports private sector to be followed.We require both types of services
keeping in mind that both not only help people but our country development also....


meenakshi Rating:


i disfavour the comment. if all the private sector is privatized , the average salary of the people
should be increased. our country will developed soon. i accept it, but only 30% of the peoples in
india is enjoying the previlage, the remaining 70% are under the poverty line due to the rise in the
cost of living.


Priya Verma Rating:


Yes ,i agree that public sector should be privatised. But some areas of bsiness shouldn't be becoz
about 40% of population in India is below poverty line and they could not afford costly things


shatabdi roy Rating:


it ws realy good. i got n excellent idea on the topic because i didnt hd ne idea. i came to knw abt
many things abt both private n public sectors. thank u.


ashish verma Rating:


its very fine discussion.


priya baj Rating:


nice discussions ,facts are less is the only weakness..


rahul t Rating:


acc to me some of the sectors should be kept public ,,bcoz there are some sectors which directly
influence poor peoples or those which r below poverty line ,,if these sectors are privatise they effect
them ,,bcoz in private sectors they there main objective is to make profit for them then think of
others ,,so acc to me some sectors shuld be reserved as semi private


santosh Rating:


public sectiors organisation have a mission not only run profitably but also to work for the
development of people and social cause. if the public sector like hospital and school college will be
privatised then it will be difficult for most of the common people and specially poor people to afford
the cost of treatment in the hospital and afford the fees of the education.


SUDHA PURNIMA Rating:


IT IS VERY NICE THANKS FOR GIVING THIS INFORMATION


adarsh kumar soni Rating:


its been excellent this site is really excedingly helpful.


SREE Rating:


it's a nice topic and is excellent in the above discussions


anu Rating:


it was avery fine article and i got tremendous information..like some of my frenz here,even i think
dat all sectors should not be privatised.apart from profits,welfare of people should also be kept in
concern.dere r many better services provided by public sector also like sbi,vijaya etc.public and
private sector go hand in hand...growth of country can be done by joint effort only.....


vikram kundu Rating:


privetization is benifisial for those organisations those not performing well. whr people do not
understand there responsiblities...


sindhura Rating:


ya this is very nice


Apeksha.Anand.Belsare Rating:


hey these points are really very helpful....it gave me 2 think in various prospects....thanks


jyothi Rating:


super


gaurav Rating:


I think that those departments from where the govt is earning money i.e. electricity board, incomtax
dept., water supply department, should privateized. b'coz in these depatments employes take
bribes and the ppl' bear. they mak the false charges against the general ppl' and tak money from
them. so that these departments are the root cause of corouption.


joy Rating:


i dont think so if people r payed better then why will they take bribe just bcoz of some people we
cannot blame the whole institution i think the govt is doing a fairly good job


neha kumari Rating:


India is a devloping country and most of the people here are very poor if all the public sectors are
privetized then where these poor people vl go.complete privetization is possible only in devloped
coutries where people are rich enough to afford.its true that their is a all of corouption in the public
sector and people do sit idle as my frd gaurav said bt ths is not the only solution for the
problem.time has come we should understand our responsibility towards our work.the minset of
people must be changed.


ayon Rating:


Mr.ssrkraju...u said it well...there are some pints like privetization is definitely help full but not to
the extent of all public sector. as u already mentioned...about few sectors...another important
sector is railway...if railway is privatized completely it will definitely hit india badly though few thing
in rail ways are already in private hand but...the main control is still under govt: and all over the
world no where it is successful by the private player such a great extent...


PARTHIBAN Rating:


hi friends,we should encourage the public sectors cos they r the backbone of india,if we take the
private sectors, they r working for improvement of that particular company only,they wont bother
about the development of the nation.take birla group of companies they r concentrating only to

develop their branches allover the world.private players r concerned with the profit only.but the
public sectors supports the people who r all below the poverty line,thank u friends..


aneef Rating:


i accept private sectors.. bcoz ask rajesh.(M.G.R)..he s working mnc..


Thahir Rating:


hi friendz.. To my view Government (public sector) are better when compared to Private Sectors.
Both are Mutually Exclusive.


g.ashwini nachammal Rating:


hi!!! i accept that there must be a balance between both the sectors.it would be better if,in
india,there is an understanding between the sectors for the development of our nation i.e. public
sectors could implement new ideas and innovate new methods for the people`s welfare and
comfort whereas private sectors can improve the nation`s economy.


deepak hinduja Rating:


i think govt.should also privatised rail way not fully but some part of it like 30% as it will be helpful
to govt. by getting monetary help from private side.the govt. will have the major power so the poor
people will not be exploited.


rashmi Rating:


i think all above statements r right,according to my point of view public sector should not be
privatised because if pub. sector will be privatised poor people can not bye those services which is
provided by public sectos because of subsidy.pub sec provided services to that poor people who r
using ration card.


shreyash Rating:


i think both sector are well.as private sector u do not have power against public sector.our country
70% people are living in rural area he did not effort as private hospital,colleges etc. public sector
have good salary, good living standard ,getting a good colleges study so many thing.


radhika Rating:


it was simply gud nd it helped me a lot for my gd session


sachin Rating:


vry gud


Ramesh HN Rating:


hey everybody, I'll start by appreciating some of you who have written excellent comments. Should

the public sector be privatized? we can't say generalize and say yes or no as it is pretty subjective.
when we say the public sectors should be privatized I'm sure we're just considering the quality of
the services or products of a private sector, otherwise we don't have any reason for privatizing the
public sector. So as far as I'm concerned we should prepare a list of the qualities which has made
the private sector very effective and efficient, for example.. 1.private sectors are result orientated
2.employees are highly professional 3.Management will be really worried about the profit of the
company which is directly related to their survival and profit and other compensation 4.
Accountability and responsibilities... etc.. are few of them what obvious is, when we privatize all the
public sectors chances off prices of going high is very likely.So, why cant we just say public sectors
should be more efficient and result oriented so that we can ensure that we'll get all the benefits (
good quality services with cheaper price) which will help underprivileged and middle class people,
because after all India has very less percentage of upper strata or elite class people.... can we say
public sectors should be efficient and effective, and start thing and debating how to do that????!!!


neha Rating:


fantastic.. i totally agree with ramesh


Swapna Rating:


I totaly agree wat Ramesh said, By Seeing all the Comments, I also wanted to share........., Public
Sector should not be privitized, if it get privitized, the rates will go high where the middle class
people and low class people cant effort such thing,, so........ instead of this, public sector should
improve their quality of service efficiently and effectively..... then everyone prefers public secotrs
where they can get good quality with the lower price, by this way we can improve the profit of
public sectors and people prefer to go public sector, this helps to the middle class people and low
level people... If anything wrong written........Please excuse me....


laxmi Rating:


hi friends, Ya though there are many dis-advantages or problems (related to delay of services,etc.)
in the public sector, still people are benefitted in one way or the other through the various means of

public norms which may not be in private undertaking. So. i feel that public sector need not be
privatised as it may not benefit the people or if it is privatised the objective of privatisation may not
the reach the people correctly.


Dhruvi Rating:


Thanks, alot friends for helping me in clarifying the concept in a way to change my personal point of
view about should public sector be privatised or it should'nt,


nehal Rating:


it is indeed a good topic to discuss. i think that there should be mixed invovlement of both private &
goverment in all sector ,, except few which are of prime importance like defence, finance, foreign
affairs etc. my idea is to incorporate private agencies in all public sectors giving them all
responsibilites. but they should be placed or headed by goverment authorities who shall regulate
them.


Mohit Saxena Rating:


Excellent Performance and views


Thilaga Rating:


This article is very useful for my GD preparation.Thanks a lot..


aseem Rating:


hello, In my point of view some public sectors should be privatized.coz if all the sectors are
privatized then there is hike in prices which in turn are out of range of the middle people and poor
people. if all the sectors got private then this will lead to increase in poor population. and due to
which our economy will go down and increase in poor people . so in my view all sectors are not
privatized only some of the sectors like transportation, and banking gets privataized. thanx.


Dharmendar Rating:


Hi, If all department are convereted in to privataized, then the poor people has to suffer. For
example, we can take Hospital, Normally for taking scan in Private hospital, they will charges five
times more than the public hospital. And also if there is no public sector, The private people take
this as a advantage and have there own rules. There will be no one to control.


Ankush Nowal Rating:


i would like to comment on what Ashutosh said ......... that mukesh ambani is giving away petrol or
vegetables at a lower cost.........but le me tell you the reason buddy , he is doing it cuz he is in
competition with the public sector and just think if public sector wasn't der, he too wouldn't have
missed the oppurtunity of rising prices and making more money outta it....personally what i feel is
that something missing in public sector is the fear of loss of job........so all needed in a public sector
is just that who is not working should be kicked out ............


alok vajpayee Rating:


fuck off ..........its bullshit group discussion.


Ashish Barn Rating:


saale yaha gd karne aaye hai bhai...........mooh chodi karne nahi samajhe BHO......


muthusamy Rating:


iam not agree with that public sector be privatised. public sector is worked more for poor people
than for rich . the cost of service is very much nearer to poor. . what th egovt have to do to minimize
the corruption & increase the more service.


mansingh Rating:

said this on 19 Nov 2009 11:41:05 PM CDT

I disagree with the view that public should be made private , yaah its true that public organization
are little bit slow as the people working in it are working slow . But we cant be unfair to poor people
, either as a customer or as a employee . Not every people are intelligent and not every people are
rich . India is a secular country with every kind of people living here , we have to take all kind of
people together . We cant throw slow people out of the country , or snatch his job coz he is slow .
Well private organization does that mostly , once you show -ve performance . they will kick u out
but not lke public organization . Public sector take needy step to hold their people . Not all public
sector are slow , our defence comes under gov organization , think if it goes private .


Viplove Goel Rating:


I wish to bring customer and employee perpective view to this topic. Privatization leads to better
and efficient working as they are return oriented in their task, but they bring in such stringent
clauses to the system that customers face the brunt of their interests. They are so much adamant
for their returns that they even lay down the average employees just to show profits in thier books.

This leads to chaos, which has multiple effects on whole economy. The benefit that we see can reap
is the standardization that they bring in and the innovative and benchmark practices to the
business. We have seen that with advent of private players in the banking system we have a more
flexible and efficient banking system. Privatization of electricity supply has led to increased
revenues, less theft of electricty. In the end i would like to say that we have to give the stick to the
government, as it will only be saviour if these private players manipulate the system.


Sudin Rating:


As far as a nation is considered its progress depends on how well its resources are utilized. And
whether this results reaches its citizen in terms of employment and better way of life. For
efficiency to come one has to make right decisions at right time. And one of the limitation with
the govt bodies is the bureaucratic system which drags the decision and action, if they change
their attitude to work then only results could be achieved. As per the current situation pvt
players are far ahead of the govt undertakings. Every sector will be privatized in future, if not
completely but definitely a certain part would be. So privatization should be brought in with
control and transparency so that results of efficiency can take the country forward


Ashish Pareek Rating:


Privatization of public sector. Lot depends of which sector we are talking about. Let me clarify few
doubts in the primary stage. Can we expect all private hospitals in our cities in our town which do
not have an entry for poor people, can we have only private sector telephone companies, can we
have private companies have complete control on oil reserves, can we have all transport be
provided by private sector and RTC vanishes, can we expect an private sector to take care of our
defense. So as far as I'm concerned we should prepare a list of the qualities which has made the
private sector very effective and efficient, for example.. 1.private sectors are result orientated
2.employees are highly professional 3.Management will be really worried about the profit of the
company which is directly related to their survival and profit and other compensation 4.
Accountability and responsibilities... etc.. are few of them what obvious is, when we privatize all the
public sectors chances off prices of going high is very likely.So, why cant we just say public sectors
should be more efficient and result oriented so that we can ensure that we'll get all the benefits (
good quality services with cheaper price) which will help underprivileged and middle class people,
because after all India has very less percentage of upper strata or elite class people.... can we say
public sectors should be efficient and effective, and start thing and debating how to do that????!!!


Anishabasu Rating:


Anisha Basu.....Kolkata Every one is talking abt the highest salary but nobody is talking abt the
higher securities of gov. jobs....We sholud take few sectors for privatization...we cannot privatize
the gov hospitals.bcz they charge a minimal cost to all the citizens. Underpriviledged peple or those
who are from below Poverty Line they cannot afford much to the private nursinghomes.... In case of
telecom industries also privatization shuold not be done..It is true that Reliance has introduced the
mobile facility first but the indian gov. also providing us better facility in respect of landline as well
as mobile at a cheap rate...further more Broadband facility is the most well liked facilty...


urvashi chauhan Rating:


privatization will definitely lead to higher growth, economic development and better facilities but
these could even be achieved by government on proper realization of their duties as they owe to
the nation and to the people and both public and private sectors are mutually active forces in the
economy which leads to healthy competition and better growth perspective.sectoral differentiation
is a must for deciding over privatization as a country like India has a mix of economically
differentiated class of people and the poor accounts for almost 40% of our population which has to
be provided which the basic necessities, ration, housing(public sector), medical care and also the
rest of the population are all not in a condition to afford to the rates of privatization so better
facilities could also be provided by the government if we design a better management at all levels
and hire well educated people, train the existing working staff and reduce the existing red tapism
across the public sectors.The existence of both the sectors in the economy will efficiently lead to
development and growth.


avik mukherjee Rating:


good


babu Rating:


i m not agree to many thought because in public sector exams is very hard compare to private
sector exams , so in public sector employee are able to do anything but our system is wrong . we
need only to correcting . we are seeing many public sector companies they r top in ranking like ongc
. bhel etc . i think no need to privatization to public sector . otherwise in future we cannot stopped
the prises and cannot get subsidy.


ANSHUL SHUKLA Rating:


hi Privtation.....its sound very attractive.bt in India if you privtatise thn you hv to mke all p/e
employed with good salary.Bt in India its tk time or nt going to b hapn.if all public sector b privatise
thn autimatically theafting,murder corpuction e.t.c will increase. n i dont thnk p/e want
this.........&obviously it depnd on sectr 2 sectr........we cnt privatise army,all hospitals,,,etc.............


mayankpriey Rating:


alot of people would say that privatisation will totally eradicate all the problems but his is not true
inspite it may create alot of problems for a nation like india which is in the developing stage imagine
if govt hospita;s are privatised,where will poors go,think of he privatisation oy BSNL private sector
will enjoy the monopolyt and in the end consumers are the sufferer.so inspite of privatising all
public bodies the necessary improvement should be done in the functioning of public sector.


nitin gupta Rating:


yes ,to some extent public sector be privtise........... articles such as food ,petroleum and necessory
goods of human need should not be privatise but article such as distribution of electricity in citied
should come in privatization fpr better use of it....

3 responses to

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à 3 responses to

Similaire à 3 responses to (20)

3 responses to