SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  38
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
INTRODUCTION

   What is finite element analysis, FEM?

   A Brief history of FEM

   What is FEM used for?

   1D Rod Elements, 2D Trusses
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD –
WHAT IS IT?
 The  Finite Element Method (FEM) is a
  numerical method of solving systems of partial
  differential equations (PDEs)
 It reduces a PDE system to a system of
  algebraic equations that can be solved using
  traditional linear algebra techniques.
  In simple terms, FEM is a method for dividing
  up a very complicated problem into small
  elements that can be solved in relation to each
  other.
Overview of the Finite
   Element Method

( S ) ⇔(W ) ≈ ( G ) ⇔( M )
Strong   Weak   Galerkin   Matrix
form     form   approx.    form
1. Lord John William Strutt Rayleigh (late 1800s), developed a
   method for predicting the first natural frequency of simple
   structures. It assumed a deformed shape for a structure and
   then quantified this shape by minimizing the distributed energy
   in the structure.

2. Ritz then exp Walter ended this into a method, now known as
   the Rayleigh-Ritz method, for predicting the stress and
   displacement behavior of structures.
3. Dr. Ray Clough coined the term “finite element” in 1960. The 1960s saw
   the true beginning of commercial FEA as digital computers replaced analog
   ones with the capability of thousands of operations per second.

4. In the 1950s, a team form Boeing demonstrated that complex surfaces
   could be analyzed with a matrix of triangular shapes.

5. In 1943, Richard Courant proposed breaking a continuous system into
   triangular segments. (The unveiling of ENIAC at the University of
   Pennsylvania.)
6. In the early 1960s, the MacNeal-Schwendle Corporation (MSC) develop a
   general purpose FEA code. This original code had a limit of 68,000
   degrees of freedom. When the NASA contract was complete, MSC
   continued development of its own version called MSC/NASTRAN, while the
   original NASTRAN become available to the public and formed the basis of
   dozens of the FEA packages available today. Around the time        6

   MSC/NASTRAN was released, ANSYS, MARC, and SAP were introduced.
7. By the 1970s, Computer-aided design, or CAD, was introduced later in the
decade.


8. standards such as IGES and DXF. Permitted limited geometry transfer
   between the systems.

9. In the 1980s,CAD progressed from a 2D drafting tool to a 3D surfacing tool,
   and then to a 3D sIn the 1980s, the use of FEA and CAD on the same
   workstation with developing geometry olid modeling system. Design
   engineers began to seriously consider incorporating FEA into the general
   product design process.

10. As the 1990s draw to a place, the PC platform has become a major force in
    high end analysis. The technology has become to accessible that it is
    actually being “hidden” inside CAD packages.
                                                                        7
BASIC CONCEPTS
 Loads
             
            f T Pi
   Equilibrium                    ~
                      σ ji , j   + fi = 0
   Boundary conditions
DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY

   Rayleigh-Ritz Method
     Total   potential energy equation

   Galerkin’s Method
1D ROD ELEMENTS
   To understand and solve 2D and 3D problems we must
    understand basic of 1D problems.

   Analysis of 1D rod elements can be done using
    Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin’s method.

   To solve FEA problems same are modified in the
    Potential-Energy approach and Galerkin’s approach
1D ROD ELEMENTS

   Loading consists of three types : body force f , traction
    force T, point load Pi


   Body force: distributed force , acting on every
    elemental volume of body i.e. self weight of body.

   Traction force: distributed force , acting on surface of
    body i.e. frictional resistance, viscous drag and surface
    shear

   Point load: a force acting on any single point of element
1D ROD ELEMENTS                       Element -1         Element-2

                                               1 T e 
   Element strain energy                 U e = q [k ]q
                                               2
   Element stiffness matrix
                                                E e Ae      1 − 1
                                         [k ] =
                                            e
                                                           − 1 1 
                                                  le             
   Load vectors
     Element body load vector
     Element traction-force vector              e Ae l e f   1
                                                f =            
                                                      2        1
                                                 e Tl e   1
                                                T =        
                                                     2     1
2D TRUSS
   2 DOF

   Transformations

   Modified Stiffness Matrix

   Methods of Solving
2D TRUSS

   Transformation Matrix
     Direction   Cosines

                            le =   ( x2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2

                                          x 2 − x1
           l m 0 0          l = cos θ =
    [ L] =                                   le
            0 0 l m
                    
                                          y 2 − y1
                              m = sin θ =
                                              le
2D TRUSS

   Element Stiffness Matrix




                           l2    lm     − l 2 − lm 
                                                  2
                   E e Ae  lm   m2      − lm − m 
          [k e ] =
                     l e  − l 2 − lm     l2    lm 
                                                 2 
                          − lm − m
                                     2
                                         lm   m   
METHODS OF SOLVING

   Elimination Approach
     Eliminate   Constraints

   Penalty Approach
ELIMINATION METHOD
   Set defection at the constraint to equal zero
ELIMINATION METHOD
 Modified Equation
 DOF’s 1,2,4,7,8 equal to zero
2D TRUSS

   Element Stresses
                                 Ee                
                              σ=    [ − l − m l m] q
                                 le
   Element Reaction Forces

                                             
                                     R = [ K ]Q
2D TRUSS

   Development of Tables

     Coordinate Table
     Connectivity Table
     Direction   Cosines Table
2D TRUSS
   Coordinate Table
                      E.g;
2D TRUSS
   Connectivity Table
                        E.g;
2D TRUSS



le =   ( x2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2
            x 2 − x1
l = cos θ =
                le
            y 2 − y1
m = sin θ =
                le
3D TRUSS STIFFNESS MATRIX
   3D Transformation Matrix
     Direction     Cosines




                                l m n 0 0 0
                        [ L] = 
                                0 0 0 l m n
                                            


               le =       ( x 2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2 + ( z 2 − z1 ) 2
                    x 2 − x1                     y 2 − y1                       z 2 − z1
      l = cos θ =                 m = cos φ =                     n = cos ϕ =
                        le                           le                             le
3D TRUSS STIFFNESS MATRIX
   3D Stiffness Matrix



                         l2    lm   ln   − l 2 − lm − ln 
                                                         
                         lm    m2   mn − lm − m 2 − mn 
                 E e Ae  ln    mn   n2   − ln − mn − n 2 
        [k e ] =                                         
                   l e  − l 2 − lm − ln   l 2
                                                 lm   ln 
                        − lm − m 2 − mn lm     m2   mn 
                                                         
                         − ln − mn − n
                                        2              2
                                          ln   mn   n   
EXAMPLE 1D ROD ELEMENTS
  Example 1
  Problem statement: (Problem 3.1 from Chandrupatla and Belegunda’s
  book)
  Consider the bar in Fig.1, determine the following by hand calculation:
  1) Displacement at point P 2) Strain and stress
           3) Element stiffness matrix 4) strain energy in element




        Given:

                 E = 30 ×106 psi       q1 = 0.02in
                 Ae = 1.2 in 2        q2 = 0.025in
Solution:
1) Displacement (q) at point P
We have




Now linear shape functions N1( ) and N2( ) are given by

                      And
EXAMPLE 2D TRUSS
CONCLUSION

   Good at Hand Calculations, Powerful when
    applied to computers

   Only limitations are the computer limitations
MATLAB PROGRAM TRUSS2D.M
REFERENCES

Contenu connexe

Tendances

INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISINTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Achyuth Peri
 
An Introduction to the Finite Element Method
An Introduction to the Finite Element MethodAn Introduction to the Finite Element Method
An Introduction to the Finite Element Method
Mohammad Tawfik
 

Tendances (20)

Constant strain triangular
Constant strain triangular Constant strain triangular
Constant strain triangular
 
5. stress function
5.  stress function5.  stress function
5. stress function
 
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-2
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-2Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-2
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-2
 
INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSISINTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION TO FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
 
An Introduction to the Finite Element Method
An Introduction to the Finite Element MethodAn Introduction to the Finite Element Method
An Introduction to the Finite Element Method
 
Rayleigh Ritz Method
Rayleigh Ritz MethodRayleigh Ritz Method
Rayleigh Ritz Method
 
ME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS UNIT - I NOTES AND QUESTION BANK
ME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS UNIT - I NOTES AND QUESTION BANKME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS UNIT - I NOTES AND QUESTION BANK
ME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS UNIT - I NOTES AND QUESTION BANK
 
Multiple Degree of Freedom (MDOF) Systems
Multiple Degree of Freedom (MDOF) SystemsMultiple Degree of Freedom (MDOF) Systems
Multiple Degree of Freedom (MDOF) Systems
 
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-4
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-4Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-4
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-4
 
Introduction to FEA
Introduction to FEAIntroduction to FEA
Introduction to FEA
 
Shape functions
Shape functionsShape functions
Shape functions
 
Stiffness Matrix
Stiffness MatrixStiffness Matrix
Stiffness Matrix
 
FEM and it's applications
FEM and it's applicationsFEM and it's applications
FEM and it's applications
 
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-5
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-5Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-5
Finite Element Analysis - UNIT-5
 
Finite Element Method
Finite Element MethodFinite Element Method
Finite Element Method
 
Introduction to FEA and applications
Introduction to FEA and applicationsIntroduction to FEA and applications
Introduction to FEA and applications
 
Strength of Materials
Strength of MaterialsStrength of Materials
Strength of Materials
 
Introduction to FEA
Introduction to FEAIntroduction to FEA
Introduction to FEA
 
single degree of freedom systems forced vibrations
single degree of freedom systems forced vibrations single degree of freedom systems forced vibrations
single degree of freedom systems forced vibrations
 
Finite Element Methode (FEM) Notes
Finite Element Methode (FEM) NotesFinite Element Methode (FEM) Notes
Finite Element Methode (FEM) Notes
 

Similaire à Introduction to finite element method(fem)

Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
Deepak Agarwal
 
Maths assignment
Maths assignmentMaths assignment
Maths assignment
Ntshima
 
Introduction to FEM
Introduction to FEMIntroduction to FEM
Introduction to FEM
mezkurra
 
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damperParametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
MidoOoz
 

Similaire à Introduction to finite element method(fem) (20)

What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?
What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?
What happens when the Kolmogorov-Zakharov spectrum is nonlocal?
 
ep ppt of it .pptx
ep ppt of it .pptxep ppt of it .pptx
ep ppt of it .pptx
 
Moment Closure Based Parameter Inference of Stochastic Kinetic Models
Moment Closure Based Parameter Inference of Stochastic Kinetic ModelsMoment Closure Based Parameter Inference of Stochastic Kinetic Models
Moment Closure Based Parameter Inference of Stochastic Kinetic Models
 
SCRUTINY TO THE NON-AXIALLY DEFORMATIONS OF AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION ON A CYLIND...
SCRUTINY TO THE NON-AXIALLY DEFORMATIONS OF AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION ON A CYLIND...SCRUTINY TO THE NON-AXIALLY DEFORMATIONS OF AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION ON A CYLIND...
SCRUTINY TO THE NON-AXIALLY DEFORMATIONS OF AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION ON A CYLIND...
 
Chapter 1 pt 2
Chapter 1 pt 2Chapter 1 pt 2
Chapter 1 pt 2
 
Lecture5-FEA.pdf
Lecture5-FEA.pdfLecture5-FEA.pdf
Lecture5-FEA.pdf
 
Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
Lecture 3 mohr’s circle and theory of failure
 
Krishna
KrishnaKrishna
Krishna
 
Shape1 d
Shape1 dShape1 d
Shape1 d
 
1 d wave equation
1 d wave equation1 d wave equation
1 d wave equation
 
Clementfinal copy
Clementfinal copyClementfinal copy
Clementfinal copy
 
Chap-1 Preliminary Concepts and Linear Finite Elements.pptx
Chap-1 Preliminary Concepts and Linear Finite Elements.pptxChap-1 Preliminary Concepts and Linear Finite Elements.pptx
Chap-1 Preliminary Concepts and Linear Finite Elements.pptx
 
NMR Spectroscopy
NMR SpectroscopyNMR Spectroscopy
NMR Spectroscopy
 
Monopole zurich
Monopole zurichMonopole zurich
Monopole zurich
 
Maths assignment
Maths assignmentMaths assignment
Maths assignment
 
2003 Ames.Models
2003 Ames.Models2003 Ames.Models
2003 Ames.Models
 
Introduction to FEM
Introduction to FEMIntroduction to FEM
Introduction to FEM
 
Theory of elasticity and plasticity (Equations sheet part 01) Att 8676
Theory of elasticity and plasticity (Equations sheet part 01) Att 8676Theory of elasticity and plasticity (Equations sheet part 01) Att 8676
Theory of elasticity and plasticity (Equations sheet part 01) Att 8676
 
Numerical Linear Algebra for Data and Link Analysis.
Numerical Linear Algebra for Data and Link Analysis.Numerical Linear Algebra for Data and Link Analysis.
Numerical Linear Algebra for Data and Link Analysis.
 
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damperParametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
Parametric time domain system identification of a mass spring-damper
 

Introduction to finite element method(fem)

  • 2. INTRODUCTION  What is finite element analysis, FEM?  A Brief history of FEM  What is FEM used for?  1D Rod Elements, 2D Trusses
  • 3. FINITE ELEMENT METHOD – WHAT IS IT?  The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a numerical method of solving systems of partial differential equations (PDEs)  It reduces a PDE system to a system of algebraic equations that can be solved using traditional linear algebra techniques.   In simple terms, FEM is a method for dividing up a very complicated problem into small elements that can be solved in relation to each other.
  • 4. Overview of the Finite Element Method ( S ) ⇔(W ) ≈ ( G ) ⇔( M ) Strong Weak Galerkin Matrix form form approx. form
  • 5. 1. Lord John William Strutt Rayleigh (late 1800s), developed a method for predicting the first natural frequency of simple structures. It assumed a deformed shape for a structure and then quantified this shape by minimizing the distributed energy in the structure. 2. Ritz then exp Walter ended this into a method, now known as the Rayleigh-Ritz method, for predicting the stress and displacement behavior of structures.
  • 6. 3. Dr. Ray Clough coined the term “finite element” in 1960. The 1960s saw the true beginning of commercial FEA as digital computers replaced analog ones with the capability of thousands of operations per second. 4. In the 1950s, a team form Boeing demonstrated that complex surfaces could be analyzed with a matrix of triangular shapes. 5. In 1943, Richard Courant proposed breaking a continuous system into triangular segments. (The unveiling of ENIAC at the University of Pennsylvania.) 6. In the early 1960s, the MacNeal-Schwendle Corporation (MSC) develop a general purpose FEA code. This original code had a limit of 68,000 degrees of freedom. When the NASA contract was complete, MSC continued development of its own version called MSC/NASTRAN, while the original NASTRAN become available to the public and formed the basis of dozens of the FEA packages available today. Around the time 6 MSC/NASTRAN was released, ANSYS, MARC, and SAP were introduced.
  • 7. 7. By the 1970s, Computer-aided design, or CAD, was introduced later in the decade. 8. standards such as IGES and DXF. Permitted limited geometry transfer between the systems. 9. In the 1980s,CAD progressed from a 2D drafting tool to a 3D surfacing tool, and then to a 3D sIn the 1980s, the use of FEA and CAD on the same workstation with developing geometry olid modeling system. Design engineers began to seriously consider incorporating FEA into the general product design process. 10. As the 1990s draw to a place, the PC platform has become a major force in high end analysis. The technology has become to accessible that it is actually being “hidden” inside CAD packages. 7
  • 8. BASIC CONCEPTS  Loads   f T Pi  Equilibrium ~ σ ji , j + fi = 0  Boundary conditions
  • 9. DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY  Rayleigh-Ritz Method  Total potential energy equation  Galerkin’s Method
  • 10. 1D ROD ELEMENTS  To understand and solve 2D and 3D problems we must understand basic of 1D problems.  Analysis of 1D rod elements can be done using Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin’s method.  To solve FEA problems same are modified in the Potential-Energy approach and Galerkin’s approach
  • 11. 1D ROD ELEMENTS  Loading consists of three types : body force f , traction force T, point load Pi  Body force: distributed force , acting on every elemental volume of body i.e. self weight of body.  Traction force: distributed force , acting on surface of body i.e. frictional resistance, viscous drag and surface shear  Point load: a force acting on any single point of element
  • 12. 1D ROD ELEMENTS Element -1 Element-2 1 T e   Element strain energy U e = q [k ]q 2  Element stiffness matrix E e Ae  1 − 1 [k ] = e − 1 1  le    Load vectors  Element body load vector  Element traction-force vector  e Ae l e f 1 f =  2 1  e Tl e 1 T =  2 1
  • 13. 2D TRUSS  2 DOF  Transformations  Modified Stiffness Matrix  Methods of Solving
  • 14. 2D TRUSS  Transformation Matrix  Direction Cosines le = ( x2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2 x 2 − x1 l m 0 0  l = cos θ = [ L] =  le  0 0 l m  y 2 − y1 m = sin θ = le
  • 15. 2D TRUSS  Element Stiffness Matrix  l2 lm − l 2 − lm   2 E e Ae  lm m2 − lm − m  [k e ] = l e  − l 2 − lm l2 lm   2  − lm − m 2  lm m  
  • 16. METHODS OF SOLVING  Elimination Approach  Eliminate Constraints  Penalty Approach
  • 17. ELIMINATION METHOD  Set defection at the constraint to equal zero
  • 18. ELIMINATION METHOD  Modified Equation  DOF’s 1,2,4,7,8 equal to zero
  • 19. 2D TRUSS  Element Stresses Ee  σ= [ − l − m l m] q le  Element Reaction Forces   R = [ K ]Q
  • 20. 2D TRUSS  Development of Tables  Coordinate Table  Connectivity Table  Direction Cosines Table
  • 21. 2D TRUSS  Coordinate Table  E.g;
  • 22. 2D TRUSS  Connectivity Table  E.g;
  • 23. 2D TRUSS le = ( x2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2 x 2 − x1 l = cos θ = le y 2 − y1 m = sin θ = le
  • 24. 3D TRUSS STIFFNESS MATRIX  3D Transformation Matrix  Direction Cosines  l m n 0 0 0 [ L] =   0 0 0 l m n  le = ( x 2 − x1 ) 2 + ( y 2 − y1 ) 2 + ( z 2 − z1 ) 2 x 2 − x1 y 2 − y1 z 2 − z1 l = cos θ = m = cos φ = n = cos ϕ = le le le
  • 25. 3D TRUSS STIFFNESS MATRIX  3D Stiffness Matrix  l2 lm ln − l 2 − lm − ln     lm m2 mn − lm − m 2 − mn  E e Ae  ln mn n2 − ln − mn − n 2  [k e ] =   l e  − l 2 − lm − ln l 2 lm ln  − lm − m 2 − mn lm m2 mn     − ln − mn − n 2 2  ln mn n  
  • 26. EXAMPLE 1D ROD ELEMENTS Example 1 Problem statement: (Problem 3.1 from Chandrupatla and Belegunda’s book) Consider the bar in Fig.1, determine the following by hand calculation: 1) Displacement at point P 2) Strain and stress 3) Element stiffness matrix 4) strain energy in element Given: E = 30 ×106 psi q1 = 0.02in Ae = 1.2 in 2 q2 = 0.025in
  • 27. Solution: 1) Displacement (q) at point P We have Now linear shape functions N1( ) and N2( ) are given by And
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. CONCLUSION  Good at Hand Calculations, Powerful when applied to computers  Only limitations are the computer limitations