The document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. Time complexity measures the number of steps to solve a problem based on input size, with common orders being O(log n), O(n), O(n log n), O(n^2). Space complexity measures memory usage, which can be reused unlike time. Big O notation describes asymptotic growth rates to compare algorithm efficiencies, with constant O(1) being best and exponential O(c^n) being worst.
This document discusses the complexity of algorithms and the tradeoff between algorithm cost and time. It defines algorithm complexity as a function of input size that measures the time and space used by an algorithm. Different complexity classes are described such as polynomial, sub-linear, and exponential time. Examples are given to find the complexity of bubble sort and linear search algorithms. The concept of space-time tradeoffs is introduced, where using more space can reduce computation time. Genetic algorithms are proposed to efficiently solve large-scale construction time-cost tradeoff problems.
This document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. It analyzes the time complexity of bubble sort, which is O(n^2) as each pass through the array requires n-1 comparisons and there are n passes needed. Space complexity is typically a secondary concern to time complexity. Time complexity analysis allows comparison of algorithms to determine efficiency and whether an algorithm will complete in a reasonable time for a given input size. NP-complete problems cannot be solved in polynomial time but can be verified in polynomial time.
The document discusses multithreaded and distributed algorithms. It describes multithreaded algorithms as having concurrent execution of parts of a program to maximize CPU utilization. Key aspects include communication models, types of threading, and performance measures. Distributed algorithms do not assume a central coordinator and are run across distributed systems without shared memory. Examples of distributed algorithms provided are breadth-first search, minimum spanning tree, naive string matching, and Rabin-Karp string matching.
Big O notation describes how efficiently an algorithm or function grows as the input size increases. It focuses on the worst-case scenario and ignores constant factors. Common time complexities include O(1) for constant time, O(n) for linear time, and O(n^2) for quadratic time. To determine an algorithm's complexity, its operations are analyzed, such as the number of statements, loops, and function calls.
The document discusses algorithm analysis and asymptotic notation. It defines algorithm analysis as comparing algorithms based on running time and other factors as problem size increases. Asymptotic notation such as Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta are introduced to classify algorithms based on how their running times grow relative to input size. Common time complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential are also covered. The properties and uses of asymptotic notation for equations and inequalities are explained.
The document discusses divide and conquer algorithms and merge sort. It provides details on how merge sort works including: (1) Divide the input array into halves recursively until single element subarrays, (2) Sort the subarrays using merge sort recursively, (3) Merge the sorted subarrays back together. The overall running time of merge sort is analyzed to be θ(nlogn) as each level of recursion contributes θ(n) work and there are logn levels of recursion.
The document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. Time complexity measures the number of steps to solve a problem based on input size, with common orders being O(log n), O(n), O(n log n), O(n^2). Space complexity measures memory usage, which can be reused unlike time. Big O notation describes asymptotic growth rates to compare algorithm efficiencies, with constant O(1) being best and exponential O(c^n) being worst.
This document discusses the complexity of algorithms and the tradeoff between algorithm cost and time. It defines algorithm complexity as a function of input size that measures the time and space used by an algorithm. Different complexity classes are described such as polynomial, sub-linear, and exponential time. Examples are given to find the complexity of bubble sort and linear search algorithms. The concept of space-time tradeoffs is introduced, where using more space can reduce computation time. Genetic algorithms are proposed to efficiently solve large-scale construction time-cost tradeoff problems.
This document discusses time and space complexity analysis of algorithms. It analyzes the time complexity of bubble sort, which is O(n^2) as each pass through the array requires n-1 comparisons and there are n passes needed. Space complexity is typically a secondary concern to time complexity. Time complexity analysis allows comparison of algorithms to determine efficiency and whether an algorithm will complete in a reasonable time for a given input size. NP-complete problems cannot be solved in polynomial time but can be verified in polynomial time.
The document discusses multithreaded and distributed algorithms. It describes multithreaded algorithms as having concurrent execution of parts of a program to maximize CPU utilization. Key aspects include communication models, types of threading, and performance measures. Distributed algorithms do not assume a central coordinator and are run across distributed systems without shared memory. Examples of distributed algorithms provided are breadth-first search, minimum spanning tree, naive string matching, and Rabin-Karp string matching.
Big O notation describes how efficiently an algorithm or function grows as the input size increases. It focuses on the worst-case scenario and ignores constant factors. Common time complexities include O(1) for constant time, O(n) for linear time, and O(n^2) for quadratic time. To determine an algorithm's complexity, its operations are analyzed, such as the number of statements, loops, and function calls.
The document discusses algorithm analysis and asymptotic notation. It defines algorithm analysis as comparing algorithms based on running time and other factors as problem size increases. Asymptotic notation such as Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta are introduced to classify algorithms based on how their running times grow relative to input size. Common time complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential are also covered. The properties and uses of asymptotic notation for equations and inequalities are explained.
The document discusses divide and conquer algorithms and merge sort. It provides details on how merge sort works including: (1) Divide the input array into halves recursively until single element subarrays, (2) Sort the subarrays using merge sort recursively, (3) Merge the sorted subarrays back together. The overall running time of merge sort is analyzed to be θ(nlogn) as each level of recursion contributes θ(n) work and there are logn levels of recursion.
Big O notation is used in Computer Science to describe the performance or complexity of an algorithm. Big O specifically describes the worst-case scenario, and can be used to describe the execution time required or the space used (e.g. in memory or on disk) by an algorithm.
For further information
https://github.com/ashim888/dataStructureAndAlgorithm
References:
https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-science/algorithms/asymptotic-notation/a/asymptotic-notation
http://web.mit.edu/16.070/www/lecture/big_o.pdf
https://rob-bell.net/2009/06/a-beginners-guide-to-big-o-notation/
https://justin.abrah.ms/computer-science/big-o-notation-explained.html
The document discusses divide and conquer algorithms and their analysis. It explains that divide and conquer algorithms follow three steps: (1) divide the problem into subproblems, (2) conquer the subproblems by solving them recursively, and (3) combine the solutions to solve the original problem. Many classical algorithms like merge sort and quicksort use the divide and conquer approach. The document also presents the master theorem for analyzing divide and conquer recurrences of the form T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n). It demonstrates applying the master theorem to different examples to determine their time complexities.
This document contains information about Kamalesh Karmakar, an assistant professor in the computer science department at Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology. It lists the algorithm topics he teaches, including algorithm analysis, design techniques, complexity theory, and more. It also provides references for algorithm textbooks and notes on time and space complexity analysis, asymptotic notation, and different algorithm design techniques like divide-and-conquer, dynamic programming, backtracking, and greedy methods.
This document discusses asymptotic notation which is used to describe the running time of algorithms. It introduces the Big O, Big Omega, and Theta notations. Big O notation represents the upper bound or worst case running time. Big Omega notation represents the lower bound or best case running time. Theta notation represents the running time between the upper and lower bounds. The document provides mathematical definitions and examples of how to determine if a function is Big O, Big Omega, or Theta notation.
This document discusses computational complexity and analyzing the running time of algorithms. It defines big-O notation, which is used to classify algorithms according to their worst-case performance as the problem size increases. Examples are provided of algorithms with running times that are O(1), O(log N), O(N), O(N log N), O(N^2), O(N^3), and O(2^N). The growth rates of these functions from slowest to fastest are also listed.
how to calclute time complexity of algortihmSajid Marwat
This document discusses algorithm analysis and complexity. It defines key terms like asymptotic complexity, Big-O notation, and time complexity. It provides examples of analyzing simple algorithms like a sum function to determine their time complexity. Common analyses include looking at loops, nested loops, and sequences of statements. The goal is to classify algorithms according to their complexity, which is important for large inputs and machine-independent. Algorithms are classified based on worst, average, and best case analyses.
Basic Computer Engineering Unit II as per RGPV SyllabusNANDINI SHARMA
The document provides an overview of algorithms and computational complexity. It defines an algorithm as a set of unambiguous steps to solve a problem, and discusses how algorithms can be expressed using different languages. It then covers algorithmic complexity and how to analyze the time complexity of algorithms using asymptotic notation like Big-O notation. Specific time complexities like constant, linear, logarithmic, and quadratic time are defined. The document also discusses flowcharts as a way to represent algorithms graphically and introduces some basic programming concepts.
asymptotic analysis and insertion sort analysisAnindita Kundu
This document discusses asymptotic analysis of algorithms. It introduces key concepts like algorithms, data structures, best/average/worst case running times, and asymptotic notations like Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta. These notations are used to describe the long-term growth rates of functions and provide upper/lower/tight bounds on the running time of algorithms as the input size increases. Examples show how to analyze the asymptotic running time of algorithms like insertion sort, which is O(n^2) in the worst case but O(n) in the best case.
The document discusses analyzing the running time of algorithms using Big-O notation. It begins by introducing Big-O notation and how it is used to generalize the running time of algorithms as input size grows. It then provides examples of calculating the Big-O running time of simple programs and algorithms with loops but no subprogram calls or recursion. Key concepts covered include analyzing worst-case and average-case running times, and rules for analyzing the running time of programs with basic operations and loops.
The document discusses approximation algorithms and genetic algorithms for solving optimization problems like the traveling salesman problem (TSP) and vertex cover problem. It provides examples of approximation algorithms for these NP-hard problems, including algorithms that find near-optimal solutions within polynomial time. Genetic algorithms are also presented as an approach to solve TSP and other problems by encoding potential solutions and applying genetic operators like crossover and mutation.
This document provides an overview of data structures and algorithms. It defines key concepts like data structures, abstract data types, algorithms, asymptotic analysis and different algorithm design methods. It discusses analyzing time and space complexity of algorithms and introduces common asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega and Theta notations. It also provides examples of different algorithm design techniques like divide and conquer, dynamic programming, greedy algorithms, backtracking and branch and bound.
This document discusses data structures and asymptotic analysis. It begins by defining key terminology related to data structures, such as abstract data types, algorithms, and implementations. It then covers asymptotic notations like Big-O, describing how they are used to analyze algorithms independently of implementation details. Examples are given of analyzing the runtime of linear search and binary search, showing that binary search has better asymptotic performance of O(log n) compared to linear search's O(n).
Graph Traversal Algorithms - Breadth First SearchAmrinder Arora
The document discusses branch and bound algorithms. It begins with an overview of breadth first search (BFS) and how it can be used to solve problems on infinite mazes or graphs. It then provides pseudocode for implementing BFS using a queue data structure. Finally, it discusses branch and bound as a general technique for solving optimization problems that applies when greedy methods and dynamic programming fail. Branch and bound performs a BFS-like search, but prunes parts of the search tree using lower and upper bounds to avoid exploring all possible solutions.
This document provides an introduction to asymptotic analysis of algorithms. It discusses analyzing algorithms based on how their running time increases with the size of the input problem. The key points are:
- Algorithms are compared based on their asymptotic running time as the input size increases, which is more useful than actual running times on a specific computer.
- The main types of analysis are worst-case, best-case, and average-case running times.
- Asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega, and Theta are used to classify algorithms based on their rate of growth as the input increases.
- Common orders of growth include constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential time.
Lecture 5: Asymptotic analysis of algorithmsVivek Bhargav
The document discusses asymptotic analysis of algorithms to analyze efficiency in terms of time and space complexity. It explains that the number of basic operations like arithmetic, data movement, and control operations determines time complexity, while space complexity depends on the number of basic data types used. Different algorithms for counting numbers with factorial divisible by 5 are analyzed to find their time complexity. The time complexity of an algorithm can be expressed using Θ notation, which describes the dominant term as the input size increases.
Lec 5 asymptotic notations and recurrencesAnkita Karia
This document introduces asymptotic notation and methods for analyzing algorithm runtimes. It discusses Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta notations for describing upper bounds, lower bounds, and tight bounds of a function. It also covers solving recurrence relations using substitution, recursion trees, and the master method. The master method provides a way to solve recurrences of the form T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n) based on comparing f(n) to nlogba.
This chapter discusses algorithm analysis and asymptotic analysis of functions. It introduces the Big-O, Theta, little-o, and little-omega notations for classifying algorithms by their growth rates. Functions can have the same rate of growth (Theta), a slower rate (little-o), or a faster rate (little-omega). Rules are provided for manipulating Big-O expressions, and typical time complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential functions are covered.
This document discusses asymptotic analysis and recurrence relations. It begins by introducing asymptotic notations like Big O, Omega, and Theta notation that are used to analyze algorithms. It then discusses recurrence relations, which express the running time of algorithms in terms of input size. The document provides examples of using recurrence relations to find the time complexity of algorithms like merge sort. It also discusses how to calculate time complexity functions like f(n) asymptotically rather than calculating exact running times. The goal of this analysis is to understand how algorithm running times scale with input size.
Measuring the performance of algorithm, in terms of Big(O), theta, and Omega notation with respect to their Scientific notation like Worst, Average, Best, cases
Big O notation is used in Computer Science to describe the performance or complexity of an algorithm. Big O specifically describes the worst-case scenario, and can be used to describe the execution time required or the space used (e.g. in memory or on disk) by an algorithm.
For further information
https://github.com/ashim888/dataStructureAndAlgorithm
References:
https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-science/algorithms/asymptotic-notation/a/asymptotic-notation
http://web.mit.edu/16.070/www/lecture/big_o.pdf
https://rob-bell.net/2009/06/a-beginners-guide-to-big-o-notation/
https://justin.abrah.ms/computer-science/big-o-notation-explained.html
The document discusses divide and conquer algorithms and their analysis. It explains that divide and conquer algorithms follow three steps: (1) divide the problem into subproblems, (2) conquer the subproblems by solving them recursively, and (3) combine the solutions to solve the original problem. Many classical algorithms like merge sort and quicksort use the divide and conquer approach. The document also presents the master theorem for analyzing divide and conquer recurrences of the form T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n). It demonstrates applying the master theorem to different examples to determine their time complexities.
This document contains information about Kamalesh Karmakar, an assistant professor in the computer science department at Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology. It lists the algorithm topics he teaches, including algorithm analysis, design techniques, complexity theory, and more. It also provides references for algorithm textbooks and notes on time and space complexity analysis, asymptotic notation, and different algorithm design techniques like divide-and-conquer, dynamic programming, backtracking, and greedy methods.
This document discusses asymptotic notation which is used to describe the running time of algorithms. It introduces the Big O, Big Omega, and Theta notations. Big O notation represents the upper bound or worst case running time. Big Omega notation represents the lower bound or best case running time. Theta notation represents the running time between the upper and lower bounds. The document provides mathematical definitions and examples of how to determine if a function is Big O, Big Omega, or Theta notation.
This document discusses computational complexity and analyzing the running time of algorithms. It defines big-O notation, which is used to classify algorithms according to their worst-case performance as the problem size increases. Examples are provided of algorithms with running times that are O(1), O(log N), O(N), O(N log N), O(N^2), O(N^3), and O(2^N). The growth rates of these functions from slowest to fastest are also listed.
how to calclute time complexity of algortihmSajid Marwat
This document discusses algorithm analysis and complexity. It defines key terms like asymptotic complexity, Big-O notation, and time complexity. It provides examples of analyzing simple algorithms like a sum function to determine their time complexity. Common analyses include looking at loops, nested loops, and sequences of statements. The goal is to classify algorithms according to their complexity, which is important for large inputs and machine-independent. Algorithms are classified based on worst, average, and best case analyses.
Basic Computer Engineering Unit II as per RGPV SyllabusNANDINI SHARMA
The document provides an overview of algorithms and computational complexity. It defines an algorithm as a set of unambiguous steps to solve a problem, and discusses how algorithms can be expressed using different languages. It then covers algorithmic complexity and how to analyze the time complexity of algorithms using asymptotic notation like Big-O notation. Specific time complexities like constant, linear, logarithmic, and quadratic time are defined. The document also discusses flowcharts as a way to represent algorithms graphically and introduces some basic programming concepts.
asymptotic analysis and insertion sort analysisAnindita Kundu
This document discusses asymptotic analysis of algorithms. It introduces key concepts like algorithms, data structures, best/average/worst case running times, and asymptotic notations like Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta. These notations are used to describe the long-term growth rates of functions and provide upper/lower/tight bounds on the running time of algorithms as the input size increases. Examples show how to analyze the asymptotic running time of algorithms like insertion sort, which is O(n^2) in the worst case but O(n) in the best case.
The document discusses analyzing the running time of algorithms using Big-O notation. It begins by introducing Big-O notation and how it is used to generalize the running time of algorithms as input size grows. It then provides examples of calculating the Big-O running time of simple programs and algorithms with loops but no subprogram calls or recursion. Key concepts covered include analyzing worst-case and average-case running times, and rules for analyzing the running time of programs with basic operations and loops.
The document discusses approximation algorithms and genetic algorithms for solving optimization problems like the traveling salesman problem (TSP) and vertex cover problem. It provides examples of approximation algorithms for these NP-hard problems, including algorithms that find near-optimal solutions within polynomial time. Genetic algorithms are also presented as an approach to solve TSP and other problems by encoding potential solutions and applying genetic operators like crossover and mutation.
This document provides an overview of data structures and algorithms. It defines key concepts like data structures, abstract data types, algorithms, asymptotic analysis and different algorithm design methods. It discusses analyzing time and space complexity of algorithms and introduces common asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega and Theta notations. It also provides examples of different algorithm design techniques like divide and conquer, dynamic programming, greedy algorithms, backtracking and branch and bound.
This document discusses data structures and asymptotic analysis. It begins by defining key terminology related to data structures, such as abstract data types, algorithms, and implementations. It then covers asymptotic notations like Big-O, describing how they are used to analyze algorithms independently of implementation details. Examples are given of analyzing the runtime of linear search and binary search, showing that binary search has better asymptotic performance of O(log n) compared to linear search's O(n).
Graph Traversal Algorithms - Breadth First SearchAmrinder Arora
The document discusses branch and bound algorithms. It begins with an overview of breadth first search (BFS) and how it can be used to solve problems on infinite mazes or graphs. It then provides pseudocode for implementing BFS using a queue data structure. Finally, it discusses branch and bound as a general technique for solving optimization problems that applies when greedy methods and dynamic programming fail. Branch and bound performs a BFS-like search, but prunes parts of the search tree using lower and upper bounds to avoid exploring all possible solutions.
This document provides an introduction to asymptotic analysis of algorithms. It discusses analyzing algorithms based on how their running time increases with the size of the input problem. The key points are:
- Algorithms are compared based on their asymptotic running time as the input size increases, which is more useful than actual running times on a specific computer.
- The main types of analysis are worst-case, best-case, and average-case running times.
- Asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega, and Theta are used to classify algorithms based on their rate of growth as the input increases.
- Common orders of growth include constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential time.
Lecture 5: Asymptotic analysis of algorithmsVivek Bhargav
The document discusses asymptotic analysis of algorithms to analyze efficiency in terms of time and space complexity. It explains that the number of basic operations like arithmetic, data movement, and control operations determines time complexity, while space complexity depends on the number of basic data types used. Different algorithms for counting numbers with factorial divisible by 5 are analyzed to find their time complexity. The time complexity of an algorithm can be expressed using Θ notation, which describes the dominant term as the input size increases.
Lec 5 asymptotic notations and recurrencesAnkita Karia
This document introduces asymptotic notation and methods for analyzing algorithm runtimes. It discusses Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta notations for describing upper bounds, lower bounds, and tight bounds of a function. It also covers solving recurrence relations using substitution, recursion trees, and the master method. The master method provides a way to solve recurrences of the form T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n) based on comparing f(n) to nlogba.
This chapter discusses algorithm analysis and asymptotic analysis of functions. It introduces the Big-O, Theta, little-o, and little-omega notations for classifying algorithms by their growth rates. Functions can have the same rate of growth (Theta), a slower rate (little-o), or a faster rate (little-omega). Rules are provided for manipulating Big-O expressions, and typical time complexities like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential functions are covered.
This document discusses asymptotic analysis and recurrence relations. It begins by introducing asymptotic notations like Big O, Omega, and Theta notation that are used to analyze algorithms. It then discusses recurrence relations, which express the running time of algorithms in terms of input size. The document provides examples of using recurrence relations to find the time complexity of algorithms like merge sort. It also discusses how to calculate time complexity functions like f(n) asymptotically rather than calculating exact running times. The goal of this analysis is to understand how algorithm running times scale with input size.
Measuring the performance of algorithm, in terms of Big(O), theta, and Omega notation with respect to their Scientific notation like Worst, Average, Best, cases
This document discusses algorithm analysis and complexity. It explains that algorithm analysis aims to predict performance by analyzing time and space complexity as functions of input size. Time complexity indicates how fast an algorithm runs, while space complexity refers to memory usage. Common complexities include constant, logarithmic, linear, linearithmic, polynomial, and exponential orders of growth. The analysis framework focuses on analyzing asymptotic order of growth for running time and memory usage as input size increases.
Data structures notes for college students btech.pptxKarthikVijay59
The document provides information about data structures and algorithms. It defines key concepts such as data structures, algorithms, time complexity, space complexity, asymptotic notation (Big O, Big Omega, Big Theta). It discusses various data structures like stacks, queues, trees, graphs and sorting/searching techniques. It also lists the objectives of learning data structures as understanding linear and non-linear data structures and their applications, sorting/searching techniques, and memory management.
Performance analysis is important for algorithms and software features. Asymptotic analysis evaluates how an algorithm's time or space requirements grow with increasing input size, ignoring constants and machine-specific factors. This allows algorithms to be analyzed and compared regardless of machine or small inputs. The document discusses common time complexities like O(1), O(n), O(n log n), and analyzing worst, average, and best cases. It also covers techniques like recursion, amortized analysis, and the master method for solving algorithm recurrences.
The document discusses algorithms and algorithm analysis. It provides examples to illustrate key concepts in algorithm analysis including worst-case, average-case, and best-case running times. The document also introduces asymptotic notation such as Big-O, Big-Omega, and Big-Theta to analyze the growth rates of algorithms. Common growth rates like constant, logarithmic, linear, quadratic, and exponential functions are discussed. Rules for analyzing loops and consecutive statements are provided. Finally, algorithms for two problems - selection and maximum subsequence sum - are analyzed to demonstrate algorithm analysis techniques.
The Theta (Θ) notation is a method of expressing the asymptotic tight bound on the growth rate of an
algorithm’s running time both from above and below ends i.e. upper bound and lower bound.
The document discusses searching algorithms for data structures. It defines a dictionary as an unordered collection of key-value pairs where each key is unique. Common dictionary operations are described like retrieving a value by key. Linear and binary searches are discussed as sequential and interval searching algorithms. Big O, Omega, and Theta notations are introduced for analyzing time complexity of algorithms. Common time complexities like O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n^2) are provided. The linear search algorithm is explained through pseudocode.
Ch-2 final exam documet compler design elementsMAHERMOHAMED27
The "Project Risk Management" course transformed me from a passive observer of risk to a proactive risk management champion. Here are some key learnings that will forever change my approach to projects:
The Proactive Mindset: I transitioned from simply reacting to problems to anticipating and mitigating them. The course emphasized the importance of proactive risk identification through techniques like brainstorming, SWOT analysis, and FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis). This allows for early intervention and prevents minor issues from snowballing into major roadblocks.
Risk Assessment and Prioritization: I learned to assess the likelihood and impact of each identified risk. The course introduced qualitative and quantitative risk analysis methods, allowing me to prioritize risks based on their potential severity. This empowers me to focus resources on the most critical threats to project success.
Developing Response Strategies: The course equipped me with a toolbox of risk response strategies. I learned about risk avoidance, mitigation, transference, and acceptance strategies, allowing me to choose the most appropriate approach for each risk. For example, I can now advocate for additional training to mitigate a knowledge gap risk or build buffer time into the schedule to address potential delays.
Communication and Monitoring: The course highlighted the importance of clear communication regarding risks. I learned to effectively communicate risks to stakeholders, ensuring everyone is aware of potential challenges and mitigation plans. Additionally, I gained valuable insights into risk monitoring and tracking, allowing for continuous evaluation and adaptation as the project progresses.
In essence, "Project Risk Management" equipped me with the knowledge and tools to navigate the inevitable uncertainties of projects. By embracing a proactive approach, I can now lead projects with greater confidence, increasing the chances of achieving successful outcomes.
This paper introduces a new comparison base stable sorting algorithm, named RA sort. The RA sort
involves only the comparison of pair of elements in an array which ultimately sorts the array and does not
involve the comparison of each element with every other element. It tries to build upon the relationship
established between the elements in each pass. Instead of going for a blind comparison we prefer a
selective comparison to get an efficient method. Sorting is a fundamental operation in computer science.
This algorithm is analysed both theoretically and empirically to get a robust average case result. We have
performed its Empirical analysis and compared its performance with the well-known quick sort for various
input types. Although the theoretical worst case complexity of RA sort is Yworst(n) = O(n√), the
experimental results suggest an empirical Oemp(nlgn)1.333 time complexity for typical input instances, where
the parameter n characterizes the input size. The theoretical complexity is given for comparison operation.
We emphasize that the theoretical complexity is operation specific whereas the empirical one represents the
overall algorithmic complexity.
The presentation covered time and space complexity, average and worst case analysis, and asymptotic notations. It defined key concepts like time complexity measures the number of operations, space complexity measures memory usage, and worst case analysis provides an upper bound on running time. Common asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega, and Theta were explained, and how they are used to compare how functions grow relative to each other as input size increases.
The document discusses using the Master's Theorem to analyze the time complexity of recursive algorithms. It provides an overview of the Master's Theorem and its three cases. The paper proposes modifying the theorem to estimate derivatives of iterative functions. It demonstrates applying the modified theorem to examples like the Tower of Hanoi problem and Fibonacci sequence. The modified theorem requires certain conditions on the function, and the paper provides guidelines for identifying these conditions. It discusses potential applications in algorithm analysis and understanding complex functions. Overall, the paper contributes new knowledge on using the Master's Theorem to analyze derivatives and offers a novel perspective.
The document discusses complexity analysis of algorithms. It defines time complexity as the calculation of the total time required for an algorithm to execute, and space complexity as the calculation of memory space required. Time and space complexity can be analyzed using asymptotic analysis, which studies how performance changes with increasing input size. Asymptotic notations like Big-O, Omega, and Theta are used to analyze best case, worst case, and average case time complexity. Big-O notation represents upper time bound, Omega lower time bound, and Theta both upper and lower time bound. Examples are given of functions and their time complexities using these notations.
TIME EXECUTION OF DIFFERENT SORTED ALGORITHMSTanya Makkar
what is Algorithm and classification and its complexity
Time Complexity
Time Space trade-off
Asymptotic time complexity of algorithm and its notation
Why do we need to classify running time of algorithm into growth rates?
Big O-h notation and example
Big omega notation and example
Big theta notation and its example
best among the 3 notation
finding complexity f(n) for certain cases
1. Average case
2.Best case
3.Worst case
Searching
Sorting
complexity of Sorting
Conclusion
derivative, in mathematics, the rate of change of a function with respect to a variable. Derivatives are fundamental to the solution of problems in calculus and differential equations.
What are derivatives with example?
A derivative is an instrument whose value is derived from the value of one or more underlying, which can be commodities, precious metals, currency, bonds, stocks, stocks indices, etc. Four most common examples of derivative instruments are Forwards, Futures, Options and Swaps. 2.
In mathematics, derivative is defined as the method that shows the simultaneous rate of change. That means it is used to represent the amount by which the given function is changing at a certain point.
In mathematics, the derivative shows the sensitivity of change of a function's output with respect to the input. Derivatives are a fundamental tool of calculus. For example, the derivative of the position of a moving object with respect to time is the object's velocity: this measures how quickly the position of the object changes when time advances.
The derivative of a function of a single variable at a chosen input value, when it exists, is the slope of the tangent line to the graph of the function at that point. The tangent line is the best linear approximation of the function near that input value. For this reason, the derivative is often described as the "instantaneous rate of change", the ratio of the instantaneous change in the dependent variable to that of the independent variable.
Derivatives can be generalized to functions of several real variables. In this generalization, the derivative is reinterpreted as a linear transformation whose graph is (after an appropriate translation) the best linear approximation to the graph of the original function. The Jacobian matrix is the matrix that represents this linear transformation with respect to the basis given by the choice of independent and dependent variables. It can be calculated in terms of the partial derivatives with respect to the independent variables. For a real-valued function of several variables, the Jacobian matrix reduces to the gradient vector.
The process of finding a derivative is called differentiation.[1] The reverse process is called antidifferentiation. The fundamental theorem of calculus relates antidifferentiation with integration. Differentiation and integration constitute the two fundamental operations in single-variable calculus.
A survey on parallel corpora alignment andrefsantos
This document provides a survey of methods for aligning parallel text corpora. It discusses the historical background of using parallel texts in language processing from the 1950s onward. Key early methods are described, including ones based on sentence length, lexical mapping between words, and identifying cognates. The document also evaluates major efforts to create benchmark datasets and evaluate system performance against gold standard alignments. It surveys the evolution of various alignment techniques and lists some relevant tools and projects in the field.
1. Algorithm analysis helps determine which algorithm is most efficient in terms of time and space consumed by analyzing the rate of growth of the time and space complexity functions as the input size increases.
2. Big-O notation provides an asymptotic upper bound on the growth rate of an algorithm, while Omega and Theta notations provide asymptotic lower and tight bounds respectively.
3. Recurrence relations can be used to analyze the time complexity of recursive algorithms, where the running time T(n) is expressed as a function of smaller inputs.
Skiena algorithm 2007 lecture09 linear sortingzukun
- The document discusses linear sorting algorithms like quicksort.
- It provides pseudocode for quicksort and explains its best, average, and worst case time complexities. Quicksort runs in O(n log n) time on average but can be O(n^2) in the worst case if the pivot element is selected poorly.
- Randomized quicksort is discussed as a way to achieve expected O(n log n) time for any input by selecting the pivot randomly.
This document discusses algorithm analysis and complexity. It introduces algorithm analysis as a way to predict and compare algorithm performance. Different algorithms for computing factorials and finding the maximum subsequence sum are presented, along with their time complexities. The importance of efficient algorithms for problems involving large datasets is discussed.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Asymptotic analysis
1. UCSE010 - DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS
1
Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
Semester-06/2020-2021
2. • There are three types of analysis that we
perform on a particular algorithm.
• Best Case indicates the minimum time required for
program execution.
• For example, the best case for a sorting algorithm would be
data that's already sorted.
2
Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
3. • Average Case indicates the average time required for
program execution.
• Finding average case can be very difficult.
• Worst Case indicates the maximum time required for
program execution.
• For example, the worst case for a sorting algorithm might
be data that's sorted in reverse order (but it depends on the
particular algorithm).
3
Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
5. The standard notations used to define the time
required and the space required by the algorithm.
The word Asymptotic means approaching a value or
curve arbitrarily closely (i.e., as some sort of limit is
taken).
There are three types of asymptotic notations to
represent the growth of any algorithm, as input
increases:
▪ Big Theta (Θ)
▪ Big Oh(O)
▪ Big Omega (Ω)
5
Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
6. 6
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
f(n) is O(g(n)), if there exists constants c and
n0 , s.t. f(n) ≤ c g(n) for all n ≥ n0
f(n) and g(n) are functions over non-negative
integers
7. 7
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
The notation Ο(n) is the formal way to express
the upper bound of an algorithm's running
time.
It measures the worst case time complexity
or the longest amount of time an algorithm can
possibly take to complete.
9. 9
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
The notation Ω(n) is the formal way to express
the lower bound of an algorithm's running
time.
It measures the best case time complexity or
the best amount of time an algorithm can
possibly take to complete.
11. 1
1
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
The notation θ(n) is the formal way to express
both the lower bound and the upper bound of
an algorithm's running time.
It measures the average case time complexity
average amount of time an algorithm can
possibly take to complete.
12. Given f(n) and g(n), which grows faster?
If Lim n→∞ f(n)/g(n) = 0, then g(n) is faster
If Lim n→∞ f(n)/g(n) = ∞, then f(n) is faster
If Lim n→∞ f(n)/g(n) = non-zero constant,
then both grow at the same rate
Solved Problems are available in
https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~sg/CS241_FL99/h
w1-practice.html
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT 12
13. 1
3
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
General Property:
If f(n) is O(g(n)) then a*f(n) is also O(g(n)) ; where a is a
constant.
Example:
f(n) = 2n²+5 is O(n²) then 7*f(n) = 7(2n²+5)
= 14n²+35 is also O(n²)
Similarly, this property satisfies both Θ and Ω notation.
We can say
If f(n) is Θ(g(n)) then a*f(n) is also Θ(g(n)); where a is a constant.
If f(n) is Ω (g(n)) then a*f(n) is also Ω (g(n)); where a is a
constant.
15. 1
5
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
Transitive Property:
If f(n) is O(g(n)) and g(n) is O(h(n)) then f(n) =
O(h(n)) .
Example: if f(n) = n , g(n) = n² and h(n)=n³
n is O(n²) and n² is O(n³) then n is O(n³)
Similarly this property satisfies for both Θ and Ω
notation.
We can say
If f(n) is Θ(g(n)) and g(n) is Θ(h(n)) then f(n) = Θ(h(n))
If f(n) is Ω (g(n)) and g(n) is Ω (h(n)) then f(n) = Ω (h(n))
16. 1
6
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
Symmetric Property:
If f(n) is Θ(g(n)) then g(n) is Θ(f(n)) .
Example: f(n) = n² and g(n) = n² then f(n) =
Θ(n²) and g(n) = Θ(n²)
This property only satisfies for Θ notation.
17. 1
7
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
Transpose Symmetric Property:
If f(n) is O(g(n)) then g(n) is Ω (f(n)).
Example: f(n) = n , g(n) = n² then n is O(n²)
and n² is Ω (n)
This property only satisfies for O and Ω
notations.
18. 1
8
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
Transpose Symmetric Property:
If f(n) is O(g(n)) then g(n) is Ω (f(n)).
Example: f(n) = n , g(n) = n² then n is O(n²)
and n² is Ω (n)
This property only satisfies for O and Ω
notations.
19. 1
9
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT
If f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = Ω(g(n)) then f(n) = Θ(g(n))
If f(n) = O(g(n)) and d(n)=O(e(n))
then f(n) + d(n) = O( max( g(n), e(n) ))
Example: f(n) = n i.e O(n), d(n) = n² i.e O(n²)
then f(n) + d(n) = n + n² i.e O(n²)
If f(n)=O(g(n)) and d(n)=O(e(n)) then
f(n) * d(n) = O( g(n) * e(n) )
Example: f(n) = n i.e O(n), d(n) = n² i.e O(n²)
then f(n) * d(n) = n * n² = n³ i.e O(n³)
20. Solved Problems are available in
https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~sg/CS241_FL99/h
w1-practice.html
Semester-06/2020-2021 Dr.Nisha Soms/SRIT 20