Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Contribuer aux rapports du GIEC Utiliser les rapports du GIEC pour l’éducation et la formation
- 1. Valérie Masson-Delmotte Groupe detravail I Contribuer aux rapports du GIEC Utiliser les rapports du GIEC pour l’éducation et la formation
- 2. Co-construction des rapports Choix des rapports spéciaux Consultations de pré-cadrage Réunions de cadrage des rapports Travail des auteurs sur la base de la littérature scientifique : rigueur, robustesse, transparence, exhaustivité Plusieurs étapes de relecture - révisions Approbation des résumés pour décideurs
- 3. Préparation du rapportspécial 1,5°C Scoping of Outline of Assessment IPCC 44 - Approval of Outline Nomination and Selection of Experts Preliminary Draft Expert Review First Order Draft IPCC 48 - Approval SPM, Acceptance of Report Expert Review Government ReviewSecond Order Draft Final Draft Government Review Science Community GovernmentsAuthors of SR1.5 IPCC 43 - Decision to undertake SR1.5 2017 2018 Aug 2016 Sept Oct June Jan July April Literature to be assessed: submitted by October 2017 to be included in the Second Order Draft for review, and accepted by April 2018 to be included in the Final Draft review. AcceptedApril SubmittedOct
- 4. Global warming of1.5°C Chapter 1 : Framing and context Chapter 2 : Mitigation pthways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development Chapter 3 : Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and uman systems Chapter 4 : Strengthening and implementing the global response to the threat of climate change Chapter 5 : Sustainable development, poverty eradication and reducing inequalities
- 5. 2016-2017 : périodeclé dans la mise en route des rapports du 6ème cycle Réunions de cadrage Appels à nominations (auteurs, éditeurs de relecture) Premières réunions d’auteurs pour les 3 rapports spéciaux Date limite de soumission pour les publications pouvant être citées dans le rapport spécial sur 1,5°C : octobre 2017
- 6. Avancées scientifiqueset publications Réunions de cadrage : questionnaires de pré-consultations, experts participants Participation aux ateliers et réunions d’experts du GIEC Auteurs principaux (LA) – travaillent en équipes pour écrire les chapitres du rapport Auteur principal coordonnateur (CLA) – coordonne le contenu d’un chapitre Auteurs contributeurs (CA) – sollicités pour des contributions ponctuelles Editeurs de relecture – assistent les groupes de travail dans l’identification d’experts pour la relecture du rapport et le suivi de la réponse aux commentaires des relecteurs Relecteurs (experts, relecture par les gouvernements) Délégations nationales et représentants des organisations observatrices en session plénière De multiples options pour contribuer
- 7. Synthèse, résuméspour décideurs (6 langues dont arabe et français) Chapitres détaillés (en anglais seulement) Questions fréquentes (FAQs) et encadrés (Boxes) Des ressources pour l’éducation et la formation
- 8. IPCC ExpertMeeting on Communication (9-10 February 2016, Oslo, Norway) Projet du Groupe I : des outils pédagogiques pour expliquer les notions clés en sciences du climat En discussion : la possibilité de collaborer avec les Académies des Sciences pour construire du matériel pédagogique à partir des résumés pour décideurs des prochains rapports (2018, 2019, 2021- 2022) Une réflexion sur la communication https://www.youtube.com/user/IPCCGeneva
- 9. Le retour d’expériencedes médiateurs des « trains du climat » Curiosité, envie de comprendre, d’être porteur de solutions Initiation à la démarche scientifique De nombreuses idées reçues fausses Exemples : couche d’ozone – effet de serre – climat tsunami – montée du niveau des mers Le défi d’expliquer le travail de scénarios, modélisation et projections L’intérêt de travailler de manière transverse aux disciplines scientifiques
- 10. Contacts Site du GIEC: http://ipcc.ch/ Secrétariat : ipcc-sec@wmo.int Presse : ipcc-media@wmo.int Groupe 1 : http://wg1.ipcc.ch tsu@ipcc-wg1.universite-paris-saclay.fr
Notes de l'éditeur
- #7 Key messages (highlight key phases of the IPCC reports cycle, including special reports): IPCC reports are massive undertaking governed procedures for preparation, review, acceptance, adoption, approval, and publication – in which hundreds of volunteer scientists examine all of the available scientific literature on topics related to climate change and put that literature in context through a process of assessment. Indicate stages where the scientific community is most likely to contribute. Lead Authors (LA) work in teams to produce the content of the chapter on the basis of the best scientific, technical and socio-economic information available. In the course of the assessment process LAs may also enlist Contributing Authors who provide LAs more technical information on specific subjects covered by the chapter; Coordinating Lead Authors (CLA) coordinate the content of the chapter they are responsible for. There are usually two CLAs per chapter; Review Editors assist the Working Groups in identifying reviewers for the expert review process, ensure that all substantive expert and government review comments are afforded appropriate consideration, advise LAs on how to handle contentious/controversial issues and ensure genuine controversies are reflected adequately in the text of the Report. There are four types of IPCC reports: “Assessment Reports” are published materials composed of the full scientific and technical assessment of climate change, generally in three volumes, one for each of the Working Groups of the IPCC. Each of the volumes may be composed of two or more sections including: (a) a Summary for Policymakers (b) an optional technical summary and (c) individual chapters and their executive summaries. “Special Report” is an assessment of a specific issue and generally follows the same structure as a volume of an Assessment Report. “Methodology Reports” are published materials, which provide practical guidelines for the preparation of greenhouse gas inventories. Such reports may be composed of two or more sections including: (a) an Overview Chapter, which broadly describes the background, structure and major features of the report, (b) individual chapters and (c) technical Annexes. “Reports” refer to the main IPCC materials (including Assessments, Synthesis, Methodology and Special Reports and their Summaries for Policy Makers and Overview Chapters). “Summary for Policymakers” is a component of a Report, such as an Assessment, Special or Synthesis Report, which provides a policy-relevant but policy-neutral summary of that Report. All IPCC reports run through a similar cycle for scoping, review, publication, and include the following stages: “Acceptance” of IPCC Reports at a Session of the Working Group or Panel signifies that the material has not been subject to line by line discussion and agreement, but nevertheless presents a comprehensive, objective and balanced view of the subject matter. “Adoption” of IPCC Reports is a process of endorsement section by section (and not line by line) used for the longer report of the Synthesis Report as described in section 4.4 and for Overview Chapters of Methodology Reports. “Approval” of IPCC Summaries for Policymakers signifies that the material has been subject to detailed, line by line discussion and agreement. The first component of an IPCC assessment is that all of the relevant literature is considered, whether or not it agrees with the dominant paradigms, and whether or not it has yet stood the test of time compared to other studies that have considered the topic. The second component is that the information from all of this literature is distilled into key messages that capture the state of knowledge at the time of the assessment. These key messages need not be known with 100% certainty, but the level of confidence must be carefully stated. A collection of pyramids might serve as a useful analogy for the structure of an IPCC assessment. The integrity in the IPCC assessments and their fidelity to the underlying scientific information comes from four main components, all thoroughly specified in the IPCC procedures. These are (1) broad, balanced participation in the author teams, (2) emphasis on a comprehensive treatment of the relevant scientific literature, (3) two stages of widely distributed, independently monitored review, and (4) word-by-word, consensus approval, by governments, of the Summaries for Policymakers.