This presentation explains the 'Geneva Conventions Significance and Current Challenges' in the context ongoing armed conflicts and the technological developments.
Geneva Conventions: Significance and Current ChallengesNilendra Kumar
This document discusses the significance and current challenges of international humanitarian law (IHL). It notes that IHL provides important protections for civilians and the wounded in armed conflicts. However, there are ongoing challenges including the blurring lines between civilians and combatants, ensuring effective implementation on the ground during conflicts, and the increasing role of private security companies. The document also outlines efforts to update IHL commentary and publications, challenges in training and education, and the need for improved dissemination and compliance with IHL.
Dissemination of IHL within the Armed Forces During the Pandemic.pptxNilendra Kumar
The Covid times presented a challenge to the armed forces in the sphere of training of international humanitarian law. The actual operational efforts in this direction were also put to unusual strain. This presentation indicates a view how dissemination efforts can be undertaken in an innovative manner during such a critical time.
Dissemination of IHL within the armed forces during the PandemicNilendra Kumar
Maj Gen Nilendra Kumar discusses challenges and opportunities for disseminating international humanitarian law (IHL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has strained militaries through infections, restricted travel and training, and delayed exercises. However, it also provides an opportunity to utilize distance learning and produce online instructional materials on IHL. General Kumar suggests virtual lectures by ICRC and focus on detention issues. Militaries can assist with vaccination and testing programs. Feedback should be sought to improve future IHL training and compliance. Cooperation with academic institutions can further dissemination efforts during this time.
Legal protection of war victims in international and non international armed ...Alexander Decker
This document summarizes the legal protections provided to victims of war under international law. It discusses the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the two Additional Protocols of 1977, which were established to strengthen protections for civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded during international and non-international armed conflicts. While these laws aim to protect vulnerable groups like women, children, and the sick, the author questions whether the protections are effectively enforced given the realities of contemporary warfare.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
Non proliferation treaty & amp India's standNaga Muruga
1) India did not sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) because the conditions of these treaties unfairly restricted developing countries like India while benefiting larger nuclear powers.
2) India's 1974 "Smiling Buddha" nuclear test, conducted for security reasons against threats from Pakistan and China, inadvertently strengthened the global non-proliferation regime and motivated more countries to sign the NPT.
3) India's decision to develop nuclear weapons was driven by its need to maintain political autonomy in a threatening security environment, as relinquishing its nuclear options would have constrained its foreign policy choices according to its leaders at the
the manual takes a developmental approach to peace education, offering methods and materials suitable to all grade levels, that we also advocate for disarmament education.
The Global Campaign for Peace Education
Geneva Conventions: Significance and Current ChallengesNilendra Kumar
This document discusses the significance and current challenges of international humanitarian law (IHL). It notes that IHL provides important protections for civilians and the wounded in armed conflicts. However, there are ongoing challenges including the blurring lines between civilians and combatants, ensuring effective implementation on the ground during conflicts, and the increasing role of private security companies. The document also outlines efforts to update IHL commentary and publications, challenges in training and education, and the need for improved dissemination and compliance with IHL.
Dissemination of IHL within the Armed Forces During the Pandemic.pptxNilendra Kumar
The Covid times presented a challenge to the armed forces in the sphere of training of international humanitarian law. The actual operational efforts in this direction were also put to unusual strain. This presentation indicates a view how dissemination efforts can be undertaken in an innovative manner during such a critical time.
Dissemination of IHL within the armed forces during the PandemicNilendra Kumar
Maj Gen Nilendra Kumar discusses challenges and opportunities for disseminating international humanitarian law (IHL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has strained militaries through infections, restricted travel and training, and delayed exercises. However, it also provides an opportunity to utilize distance learning and produce online instructional materials on IHL. General Kumar suggests virtual lectures by ICRC and focus on detention issues. Militaries can assist with vaccination and testing programs. Feedback should be sought to improve future IHL training and compliance. Cooperation with academic institutions can further dissemination efforts during this time.
Legal protection of war victims in international and non international armed ...Alexander Decker
This document summarizes the legal protections provided to victims of war under international law. It discusses the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the two Additional Protocols of 1977, which were established to strengthen protections for civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded during international and non-international armed conflicts. While these laws aim to protect vulnerable groups like women, children, and the sick, the author questions whether the protections are effectively enforced given the realities of contemporary warfare.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
Non proliferation treaty & amp India's standNaga Muruga
1) India did not sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) because the conditions of these treaties unfairly restricted developing countries like India while benefiting larger nuclear powers.
2) India's 1974 "Smiling Buddha" nuclear test, conducted for security reasons against threats from Pakistan and China, inadvertently strengthened the global non-proliferation regime and motivated more countries to sign the NPT.
3) India's decision to develop nuclear weapons was driven by its need to maintain political autonomy in a threatening security environment, as relinquishing its nuclear options would have constrained its foreign policy choices according to its leaders at the
the manual takes a developmental approach to peace education, offering methods and materials suitable to all grade levels, that we also advocate for disarmament education.
The Global Campaign for Peace Education
Prepared as background reading material for attendees at the Civil-Military Affairs Conference, this paper was written by Alison Giffen of the Stimson Center.
Historically, international humanitarian law (IHL) through the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 has required the protection of civilian populations in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions provide guidance with regard to the obligations of states and parties to a conflict to apply the principle of distinction and to ensure precaution in attack as they pursue their military objectives. This was the first international legal framework to provide for the protection of civilians and forms the foundation of the ‘Protection of Civilians’ concept.
Throughout the 1990s, devastating failures to protect civilians from violence and atrocities shaped thinking at the United Nations (UN) and gave rise to a more expansive concept of Protection of Civilians, incorporating international human rights law, international refugee law, and including best practices in peacekeeping operations and humanitarian response. This is reflected in the adoption of Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict as a thematic concern of the UN Security Council, and the development of policy and guidance relating to civilian protection since 1999, at the United Nations and elsewhere. The term ‘Protection of Civilians’ has expanded from a set of legal obligations in IHL to a conceptual and operational framework used by multiple ‘protection actors’ and practitioners—military and civilian, political and humanitarian.
The concept of Protection of Civilians has developed in response to conflicts and crises as they emerged and as a result has developed unevenly. Combined with the fact that there is no operational definition of Protection of Civilians, there is a perception among protection practitioners that different actors involved in providing protection to people caught up in crisis understand and implement the concept differently. This perception raised questions among the researchers as to whether different understandings actually exist, and if so what the implications for the implementation of civilian protection might be. This gave rise to a research project titled In Search of Common Ground – Understanding Civilian Protection Language and Practice for Civil and Military Practitioners.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
International responses to conflict and complex humanitarian emergencies are diverse and multifaceted. Different actors – among them non-government organisations (NGOs), the United Nations (UN) protection mandated organisations, UN peacekeeping forces, both military and police – all have a role to play to mitigate the impact of armed conflict on civilian populations.
Over the last 13 years a significant amount of work has been done to improve the international community’s response in relation to the protection of civilians (POC). This has been led by different actors – the UN Security Council, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and the humanitarian community made up of UN humanitarian agencies, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and NGOs – all working in the same complex humanitarian contexts.
Despite the development of POC, there is a perceived ‘disconnect’ between the understanding of different forms of protection, the different disciplines practising or working on the POC, and the different guidance and legal regimes imposing obligations on both state and non-state actors in the area of protection.
This paper is the first contribution to a broader research project that aims to determine whether the perceived disconnect between actors involved in protection work is real or anecdotal. By exploring the evolution of protection language and policy through the UN Security Council, DPKO and the humanitarian community, it is possible to develop an improved understanding of some of the reasons for distinct protection policies and definitions that exist between different actors. Some initial variations in the interpretation of POC are quick to emerge, giving rise to additional questions about how the distinctions can be better understood.
International legal framework and required social environment toraikhanna
The document discusses the international legal framework and social environment needed to ensure health care during armed conflicts. It outlines various international conventions and laws that establish the right to health and protections for medical services. These include provisions in the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols. Socially, positive perceptions and support networks are important to allow victims access to care amid conflict and insecurity. Physicians have an ethical duty to treat victims, while social support can provide material, informational and emotional aid.
The document discusses several topics related to the United Nations:
The International Court of Justice settles disputes between states and gives advisory opinions. Its 15 judges are elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. The ICJ helped resolve a territorial dispute between Malaysia and Singapore over Pedra Branca.
The UN protects children's rights through instruments like the Convention on the Rights of the Child and two Optional Protocols addressing child soldiers and sale of children.
The environment faces threats like pollution, deforestation, and climate change. Sustainable development and practices like sustainable forestry can protect the environment while enabling resource use.
The UN played roles in the Korean War by providing military aid to South Korea, and
This presentation discusses the rights of parties to a conflict to adopt methods and means of warfare at their choice while also highlighting their limits in this regard.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 8 - Sources of IHLNilendra Kumar
International humanitarian law has two main branches: the Hague law which regulates how armies conduct hostilities, and the Geneva law which regulates the protection of people under one's power. The key sources of international humanitarian law are the four 1949 Geneva Conventions for protecting victims of war, along with additional protocols from 1977. International humanitarian law is strengthened by other international agreements promoting human rights and prohibiting crimes against humanity.
This document reviews literature on trends and challenges in humanitarian civil-military coordination. It finds that the nature of international interventions has changed, with military forces increasingly undertaking humanitarian activities to achieve strategic objectives. This is challenging existing coordination frameworks. Foreign militaries are also more engaged in disaster response, driven by political and security factors. Key challenges to coordination include different cultures between militaries and humanitarian groups, and the increasing politicization and militarization of aid that conflicts with humanitarian principles of neutrality and independence. While guidance on coordination exists, the literature shows it is not always implemented effectively in practice.
The document summarizes the key discussions and outcomes from a 2011 conference on enhancing protection of civilians in peacekeeping operations. Some of the main points covered in the summary include:
- There have been efforts by the UN and AU to strengthen protection of civilians in peace operations over the last 10 years, but challenges remain as conflicts persist.
- The conference brought together 200 experts to discuss implementing recent policy reforms to better protect civilians.
- Issues discussed included defining protection of civilians, developing guidance for comprehensive protection strategies, challenges in translating policy to practice in the field, and improving training, coordination, and accountability.
- Key themes that emerged were the need for a holistic approach to protection that addresses all needs, and acknowledging more
This document summarizes a paper that examines the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law (IHL). It discusses how IHL seeks to protect civilians from armed conflict but civilians lose protection if they directly participate in hostilities. The paper analyzes definitions and elements of direct participation put forth by the ICRC, judicial tribunals, and experts. It discusses the threshold of harm, direct causation, and belligerent nexus requirements for an act to constitute direct participation. The paper also examines when direct participation begins and ends and the challenges posed by civilians who sporadically engage in hostile acts.
This document provides an analysis of challenges faced by MONUC/MONUSCO, the United Nations peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), in protecting civilians. Through interviews with Congolese civil society and MONUC staff, it identifies several protection challenges, including:
1) Organizational and operational constraints due to MONUC's complex mandate in a difficult conflict environment, illustrating the capability gap faced by modern UN peacekeeping.
2) Difficulty communicating with civilians to prevent threats, which remains one of MONUC's biggest challenges.
3) Ethical and political constraints in collaborating with the Congolese army (FARDC) on joint military operations against armed groups.
This document contains a seminar paper submission covering the topic of "The role of human rights law in complementing international humanitarian law". The paper provides background on human rights law and international humanitarian law, including their definitions and historical development. It then discusses how the two bodies of law intersect and are applied complementarily in international court judgments. The paper also reviews literature on the topic and proposes future directions and challenges to harmonizing the application of human rights law and international humanitarian law.
Remenants of war and unexploded explosives pose a great hazard to peace ans stability. IHL has devoted considerable thought to there grave consequesnces. This presentation is a study in that regard.
This document provides an analysis of the concepts of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Protection of Civilians (PoC), examining their origins, evolution, differences, and commonalities. It argues that while R2P and PoC share a concern for protecting civilians from violence, they have distinct scopes and applications. R2P focuses on preventing mass atrocities regardless of conflict, while PoC specifically addresses the protection of civilians during armed conflict. The document uses the international response to the crisis in Libya, including UN Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973, as a case study for how R2P and PoC can reinforce each other in critical situations where civilians face deadly threats.
International humanitarian law originated from ancient rules of war and aims to limit human suffering during armed conflicts. It applies only to wars and is contained in the 1949 Geneva Conventions that most countries have ratified. While the UN Charter prohibits war, loopholes allow armed conflicts to continue, demonstrating the need for humanitarian laws. These laws try to balance military needs with humanitarian protections for non-combatants. The Red Cross movement plays a key role in implementing international humanitarian law.
The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine Expectations and Realityijtsrd
Protection of citizens from violence and aggression is one of the basic responsibilities of a sovereign country. But sometimes states fail to comply with this responsibility. The Responsibility to Protect R2P is a commitment which was adopted by the members of United Nations UN in 2005. This doctrine aims at addressing four types of crimes genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The R2P was adopted with a lot of expectations but the performance of the R2P has faced criticisms over the years. Mahfujur Rahman | Md. Saifullah Akon "The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine: Expectations and Reality" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30314.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/political-science/30314/the-responsibility-to-protect-doctrine-expectations-and-reality/mahfujur-rahman
Problems of UN Funding & Legal Issues Concerning PeacekeepingNilendra Kumar
Above two issues have been highlighted in this presentation made at the 11th Winter Course on International Law organized by Indian Society of International Law during Jan 2022.
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
Regulating Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).pptxNilendra Kumar
The practice of using Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems has given rise to examine the legality of use of such weapons under the international humanitarian law. This is the aim of this presentation.
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Geneva Conventions Significance and Current Challenges.
Prepared as background reading material for attendees at the Civil-Military Affairs Conference, this paper was written by Alison Giffen of the Stimson Center.
Historically, international humanitarian law (IHL) through the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 has required the protection of civilian populations in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions provide guidance with regard to the obligations of states and parties to a conflict to apply the principle of distinction and to ensure precaution in attack as they pursue their military objectives. This was the first international legal framework to provide for the protection of civilians and forms the foundation of the ‘Protection of Civilians’ concept.
Throughout the 1990s, devastating failures to protect civilians from violence and atrocities shaped thinking at the United Nations (UN) and gave rise to a more expansive concept of Protection of Civilians, incorporating international human rights law, international refugee law, and including best practices in peacekeeping operations and humanitarian response. This is reflected in the adoption of Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict as a thematic concern of the UN Security Council, and the development of policy and guidance relating to civilian protection since 1999, at the United Nations and elsewhere. The term ‘Protection of Civilians’ has expanded from a set of legal obligations in IHL to a conceptual and operational framework used by multiple ‘protection actors’ and practitioners—military and civilian, political and humanitarian.
The concept of Protection of Civilians has developed in response to conflicts and crises as they emerged and as a result has developed unevenly. Combined with the fact that there is no operational definition of Protection of Civilians, there is a perception among protection practitioners that different actors involved in providing protection to people caught up in crisis understand and implement the concept differently. This perception raised questions among the researchers as to whether different understandings actually exist, and if so what the implications for the implementation of civilian protection might be. This gave rise to a research project titled In Search of Common Ground – Understanding Civilian Protection Language and Practice for Civil and Military Practitioners.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
International responses to conflict and complex humanitarian emergencies are diverse and multifaceted. Different actors – among them non-government organisations (NGOs), the United Nations (UN) protection mandated organisations, UN peacekeeping forces, both military and police – all have a role to play to mitigate the impact of armed conflict on civilian populations.
Over the last 13 years a significant amount of work has been done to improve the international community’s response in relation to the protection of civilians (POC). This has been led by different actors – the UN Security Council, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and the humanitarian community made up of UN humanitarian agencies, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and NGOs – all working in the same complex humanitarian contexts.
Despite the development of POC, there is a perceived ‘disconnect’ between the understanding of different forms of protection, the different disciplines practising or working on the POC, and the different guidance and legal regimes imposing obligations on both state and non-state actors in the area of protection.
This paper is the first contribution to a broader research project that aims to determine whether the perceived disconnect between actors involved in protection work is real or anecdotal. By exploring the evolution of protection language and policy through the UN Security Council, DPKO and the humanitarian community, it is possible to develop an improved understanding of some of the reasons for distinct protection policies and definitions that exist between different actors. Some initial variations in the interpretation of POC are quick to emerge, giving rise to additional questions about how the distinctions can be better understood.
International legal framework and required social environment toraikhanna
The document discusses the international legal framework and social environment needed to ensure health care during armed conflicts. It outlines various international conventions and laws that establish the right to health and protections for medical services. These include provisions in the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols. Socially, positive perceptions and support networks are important to allow victims access to care amid conflict and insecurity. Physicians have an ethical duty to treat victims, while social support can provide material, informational and emotional aid.
The document discusses several topics related to the United Nations:
The International Court of Justice settles disputes between states and gives advisory opinions. Its 15 judges are elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. The ICJ helped resolve a territorial dispute between Malaysia and Singapore over Pedra Branca.
The UN protects children's rights through instruments like the Convention on the Rights of the Child and two Optional Protocols addressing child soldiers and sale of children.
The environment faces threats like pollution, deforestation, and climate change. Sustainable development and practices like sustainable forestry can protect the environment while enabling resource use.
The UN played roles in the Korean War by providing military aid to South Korea, and
This presentation discusses the rights of parties to a conflict to adopt methods and means of warfare at their choice while also highlighting their limits in this regard.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 8 - Sources of IHLNilendra Kumar
International humanitarian law has two main branches: the Hague law which regulates how armies conduct hostilities, and the Geneva law which regulates the protection of people under one's power. The key sources of international humanitarian law are the four 1949 Geneva Conventions for protecting victims of war, along with additional protocols from 1977. International humanitarian law is strengthened by other international agreements promoting human rights and prohibiting crimes against humanity.
This document reviews literature on trends and challenges in humanitarian civil-military coordination. It finds that the nature of international interventions has changed, with military forces increasingly undertaking humanitarian activities to achieve strategic objectives. This is challenging existing coordination frameworks. Foreign militaries are also more engaged in disaster response, driven by political and security factors. Key challenges to coordination include different cultures between militaries and humanitarian groups, and the increasing politicization and militarization of aid that conflicts with humanitarian principles of neutrality and independence. While guidance on coordination exists, the literature shows it is not always implemented effectively in practice.
The document summarizes the key discussions and outcomes from a 2011 conference on enhancing protection of civilians in peacekeeping operations. Some of the main points covered in the summary include:
- There have been efforts by the UN and AU to strengthen protection of civilians in peace operations over the last 10 years, but challenges remain as conflicts persist.
- The conference brought together 200 experts to discuss implementing recent policy reforms to better protect civilians.
- Issues discussed included defining protection of civilians, developing guidance for comprehensive protection strategies, challenges in translating policy to practice in the field, and improving training, coordination, and accountability.
- Key themes that emerged were the need for a holistic approach to protection that addresses all needs, and acknowledging more
This document summarizes a paper that examines the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law (IHL). It discusses how IHL seeks to protect civilians from armed conflict but civilians lose protection if they directly participate in hostilities. The paper analyzes definitions and elements of direct participation put forth by the ICRC, judicial tribunals, and experts. It discusses the threshold of harm, direct causation, and belligerent nexus requirements for an act to constitute direct participation. The paper also examines when direct participation begins and ends and the challenges posed by civilians who sporadically engage in hostile acts.
This document provides an analysis of challenges faced by MONUC/MONUSCO, the United Nations peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), in protecting civilians. Through interviews with Congolese civil society and MONUC staff, it identifies several protection challenges, including:
1) Organizational and operational constraints due to MONUC's complex mandate in a difficult conflict environment, illustrating the capability gap faced by modern UN peacekeeping.
2) Difficulty communicating with civilians to prevent threats, which remains one of MONUC's biggest challenges.
3) Ethical and political constraints in collaborating with the Congolese army (FARDC) on joint military operations against armed groups.
This document contains a seminar paper submission covering the topic of "The role of human rights law in complementing international humanitarian law". The paper provides background on human rights law and international humanitarian law, including their definitions and historical development. It then discusses how the two bodies of law intersect and are applied complementarily in international court judgments. The paper also reviews literature on the topic and proposes future directions and challenges to harmonizing the application of human rights law and international humanitarian law.
Remenants of war and unexploded explosives pose a great hazard to peace ans stability. IHL has devoted considerable thought to there grave consequesnces. This presentation is a study in that regard.
This document provides an analysis of the concepts of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Protection of Civilians (PoC), examining their origins, evolution, differences, and commonalities. It argues that while R2P and PoC share a concern for protecting civilians from violence, they have distinct scopes and applications. R2P focuses on preventing mass atrocities regardless of conflict, while PoC specifically addresses the protection of civilians during armed conflict. The document uses the international response to the crisis in Libya, including UN Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973, as a case study for how R2P and PoC can reinforce each other in critical situations where civilians face deadly threats.
International humanitarian law originated from ancient rules of war and aims to limit human suffering during armed conflicts. It applies only to wars and is contained in the 1949 Geneva Conventions that most countries have ratified. While the UN Charter prohibits war, loopholes allow armed conflicts to continue, demonstrating the need for humanitarian laws. These laws try to balance military needs with humanitarian protections for non-combatants. The Red Cross movement plays a key role in implementing international humanitarian law.
The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine Expectations and Realityijtsrd
Protection of citizens from violence and aggression is one of the basic responsibilities of a sovereign country. But sometimes states fail to comply with this responsibility. The Responsibility to Protect R2P is a commitment which was adopted by the members of United Nations UN in 2005. This doctrine aims at addressing four types of crimes genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The R2P was adopted with a lot of expectations but the performance of the R2P has faced criticisms over the years. Mahfujur Rahman | Md. Saifullah Akon "The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine: Expectations and Reality" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30314.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/political-science/30314/the-responsibility-to-protect-doctrine-expectations-and-reality/mahfujur-rahman
Problems of UN Funding & Legal Issues Concerning PeacekeepingNilendra Kumar
Above two issues have been highlighted in this presentation made at the 11th Winter Course on International Law organized by Indian Society of International Law during Jan 2022.
Similaire à Geneva Conventions Significance and Current Challenges. (20)
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
Regulating Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS).pptxNilendra Kumar
The practice of using Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems has given rise to examine the legality of use of such weapons under the international humanitarian law. This is the aim of this presentation.
Skill Development in Law, Para Legal & other Fields and Export of Trained Man...Nilendra Kumar
Professional degree in law must be clinical in nature and based on skill development so as to enable law graduates to undertake their professional duties soon after their graduation.
The peace keepers deployed in different jurisdiction are often confronted with complicated legal problems. Troop contributing countries, member states and the Secretary General must regularly and actively engage to resolve the legal challenges.
Elective Course on Forensic Science in LawNilendra Kumar
Introduction to offer an elective course on forensics in law will hugely benefit law students interested in criminal law practice or work as Public Prosecutors.
Workshop on legal, academic or creative writing.Nilendra Kumar
The universities and colleges are advised to hold periodic and regular workshops on legal, academic and creative writing. This would inform and equip the faculty and researched scholars with competence in this field.
How to select a topic in legal, academic or creative writing?Nilendra Kumar
The new authors have to invariably face a dauntless task about the topic they should take up for writing. This presentation is an effort to help them surmount this problem.
Protection of Children in context of IHL and Counter TerrorismNilendra Kumar
Women and children need to be fully protected during armed conflict situations. Further, children are not to be recruited or employed in armed conflicts. IHL provisions are specific and clear in this regard. This presentation would highlight the law in this regard.
Law students and their parents are invariably confused about what after law school? This problem is more acute for first generation law students who hail from non-law families. The presentation is meant to help an guide them about different career options and how to proceed.
Crack JAG. Guidance program for entry to JAG Dept. & SSB interviewNilendra Kumar
Service in the Judge Advocate General's department offers and an attractive option to Law graduates, both men and women. This presentation would indicate to them what and how the screening takes place at the Services Selection Boards.
Course Curriculum and Teaching Pedagogy.pptxNilendra Kumar
The academic fraternity must have a clear understanding of the meaning and purpose of 'curriculum' and 'syllabus'. This would, apart from, the course learning objective would help in an effective delivery of the desired contents to the students.
Protection of Different Categories of Persons in Armed ConflictsNilendra Kumar
1. International humanitarian law provides protections for various categories of persons in armed conflicts including combatants, non-combatants, civilians, prisoners of war, the sick and wounded, and medical and religious personnel.
2. Protected persons such as the wounded and sick, prisoners of war, and civilian internees must be treated humanely at all times and protected from violence and public curiosity. Their quarters, food, clothing and medical treatment are specifically protected.
3. Medical personnel and facilities such as hospitals must be respected and protected to allow them to care for the wounded and sick without interference. Medical objects and civilian objects in general may not be attacked unless they become legitimate military targets.
Strict vigil is needed to guard against disruptive elements propagating false & mischievous propaganda with a view to disrupt Hindu Muslim amity in India.
Humanitarian Protection, Modern Technology amidst Global ThreatsNilendra Kumar
Changes in modern technology amidst global threats pose major challenges to humanitarian protection. This presentation would inform and nudge commanders, policy makers, military lawyers and diplomats to decide effective countermeasures.
Use of Data and Analytics in Humanitarian Decision Making. pptxNilendra Kumar
Use of data and analytics in humanitarian decision making is a major tool for the commanders in combat as also providing protection to those legally entitled to it.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
3. It is the only law which provides protection to
the injured, unarmed and civilians in armed
conflicts.
Its relevance is borne out by its wide
acceptance, i.e. 196 state parties to the U.N.
4. A. Recent conflicts have soon blurring lines
between the civilians and combatants.
B. Recent judgments in IHL indicate
emphasis on strengthening its
enforcement and implementation.
C. Role and contribution of Humanitarian
Organizations.
5. The aim of this presentation is to flag a few
major issues impacting dissemination,
compliance and enforcement of IHL Provisions
in India.
6. Completion of work relating to updated
commentary of the GC III.
Hard copy came out in Feb, 2021.
7. Handbook of International Humanitarian law,
4th edition by Oxford University Press
released in 2021.
Edited by Prof Dieter Fleck
14. 1. Additional Protocol- I, 1977
2. Additional Protocol-I Declaration Art 90
3. Additional Protocol- II, 1977
4. Additional Protocol- III, 2005
5. CPED- International Convention for the
Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance, 2006
6. ICC Statue- Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, 1998
15. 7. Protection of Cultural Property in
the event of Armed Conflict- Hague
Protocol, 1999
8. AP Mine Ban Convention 1997
9. Cluster Munitions Convention, 2008
10. ATT-Arms Trade Treaty, 2013
11. TPNW-Treaty on Prohibition of
Nuclear Weapons, 2017
17. There is a general lack of public
understanding of IHL.
Armed forces are yet to accord
attention to prepare relevant
literature and introduce steps for
realistic training.
24. 1.Lack of a standard curriculum
2.Dearth of standard literature
to teach
3.Shortage of suitable faculty
25. IHL concerns protection and humanitarian
relief during war. Hence it is not to be viewed
as a tool of diplomacy. It should be a matter
within the domain of MOD rather than the
MEA.
26. The state, defence forces and the academia
have all to take a lead in increased
dissemination and compliance of IHL.