This presentation takes a deep dive into the methodologies of HAZID and HAZOP, two cornerstone risk assessment techniques in the oil and gas industry. Over 12 slides, we compare the structured approaches of both HAZID and HAZOP, detail their individual steps, and discuss their benefits and drawbacks. The aim is to provide professionals with concise insight to make informed decisions about which method suits their project's needs. By the end, viewers will have understood each method's strategic value in the pursuit of workplace safety and efficiency.

1. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
HAZID vs. HAZOP:
A Comparative Study

2. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Introduction to HAZID and HAZOP
HAZID and HAZOP are structured methodologies
for identifying and evaluating risks
HAZID focuses on early hazard identification
HAZOP analyzes process deviations in detail

3. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Overview of HAZID
Early-stage risk identification technique
Systematic brainstorming by
multidisciplinary experts
Objective: Establish preventive measures

4. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Preparation: Define scope, objectives, and team
Hazard Identification: Listing potential hazards
Risk Analysis: Assessing and rating risks
Risk Mitigation: Proposing preventive measures
Documentation: Recording results and actions
HAZID Approach

5. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Overview of HAZOP
Focuses on identifying hazards from
process deviations
Detailed examination of deviations from
design parameters
Purpose: Prevent accidents and
improve operability

6. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Preventive Measures:
Proposing corrective actions
c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
HAZOP Methodology
Preparation:
Define scope, team, and study methodology
Deviation Identification:
Using guide words to identify potential issue
Consequence Analysis:
Assessing severity and impact
Cause Analysis:
Identifying underlying factors

7. Require multidisciplinary
input and produce
recommendations
c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Both employ a structured,
guided brainstorming
approach
HAZID is suitable for early
project phases, HAZOP for more
detailed design info
Comparing HAZID and HAZOP

8. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Benefits of HAZID
Early hazard identification and assessment
Structured approach for hazard listing
High-level detail is provided for the initial stages

9. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Drawbacks of HAZID
Corrective actions are broad-based, not specific
May not conclude detailed requirements
for preventive measures.

10. 01
02
03
c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
03
Benefits of HAZOP
Systematic identification of hazards and operability issues
Detailed analysis of causes and consequences
The multidisciplinary approach enhances hazard identification
Detailed corrective action recommendations

11. Drawbacks of HAZOP
Time and resource-intensive
Reliant on accurate, detailed design information
Effectiveness hinges on the team's expertise

12. c 2024 SynergenOG Sdn. Bhd.
Conclusion and Further Reading
: https://synergenog.com/hazid-vs-hazop/