2. The U.S. is in place to be the most
competitive global manufacturer
of chemicals as a result of hydraulic
fracturing and natural gas – the wave
of investments is far from over.
The American Chemistry Council (ACC), June 2017
3. Decoding the changing dynamics
Market
availability
Regulatory
relief
Access to
capital
Tax
reform
International markets
Domestic growth
160 changes enacted to date
Streamlining of processes
Appetite for spending
Options for deployment
Costs to business down
Incentives to construct up
The political climate has changed and new incentives are being put forth by
the current administration to attract more investment in the US
5. The typical development roadmap
Final Investment Decision
Identify Select OperateDeliver
Conceptualize/
Strategy
Prove Feasibility &
Concept
Procure/Definition
& Development
Construct OperatePublic
Sector
Private
Sector
Business Case, Feasibility Study, Project
Definition, Options Analysis
Project Design
Procurement Planning
Transaction
Management
Project
Oversight
Policy; Strategy; Business Planning; Site
Identification & Selection
Finance, Project Finance & PPP (Inception)
Finance &
Commercial
(Optimization)
Operational
Planning
Operation &
Maintenance
OwnerRequirements
6-12 months 12-18 months 18-36 months 20-40 years
Reducing
project schedule
by 6 to 12
materially
impacts NPV
6. Navigating to FID and NPV is complex
Strategy
Clarify strategic objectives to
make an informed decision;
Understand key issues and
vulnerabilities, technologies
employed, operating
efficiencies and reliabilities,
logistics and supply chain.
2
Siting
Find the best available site
to meet project objectives
and streamline permitting.
3
Financing
Get practical advice on
funding options and
opportunities, development
of partnering approach, also
business model
development.
4
Market access
Establish a differentiated
position, optimize product
slates, understand feedstock
supply and security, identify
and access target markets.
With multiple factors to consider, many of which are interrelated, navigating the right FID is complex.
To simplify these factors, they are roughly categorised into four main work streams below:
1
7. Speed to market – traditional approach
Differing company cultures, internal priorities, and project priorities, along with
inconsistent project delivery capabilities slow your speed to market.
RevenueGeneration
• Higher potential OPEX
• Potential poor siting
constraints
• Reduced NPV and ROI
Site ID Market
Access
Finance
Strategy
Consultants/Advisors
Traditional
Approach
FID
Months
8. Speed to market – roadmap to success
Definition of strategic objectives
Business case definition
Financial model and sensitivity analysis
Market definition
Technology position
Strategy
Market
Access
Value chain and product slate analysis
Identification of target market and opportunity size
Go to market strategy
Completive strength and product differentiation
Competitor analysis and market intel (local offices)
9. Speed to market – roadmap to success
Develop decision criteria
Comparative analysis of options
Data collection and site visits
Identification and execution of required studies (logistics, environmental)
Master planning
Stakeholder engagement
Optimize permitting process and interface with regulatory bodies
Leverage relationships with Economic Development Partners for access to
best sites
Site ID
10. Speed to market – roadmap to success
Find and select the most appropriate financial vehicle
Identify possible funding partners
Options for alternative service delivery, ie. ownership of non-core assets
Due diligence
Finance
11. Ultimately, speed to market relies on tight
integration of business strategy, the ability
to respond, and certainty in approach.
12. Increasing your speed to market
Traditional
approach
Advisian
approach
RevenueGeneration
• Consistent, efficient organization structure
• Reduced operating risk
• >NPV
Subject Matter Experts
• Project delivery
• Oriented org. structure
• Proven project execution
experience & platforms
Strategy
Site ID Market
Access
Finance
FinancialInvestmentDecision
Isn’t it time you took advantage
of this opportunity?
6-12
months
13. Advisian’s approach works each work
stream in parallel, seamlessly feeding the
results from one into the other.
14. This reduces the number of interfaces
and third parties involved, as well as the
time to FID to 6 to 12 months.
15. Because faster is better.
More bankable investments.
Cost and schedule predictability.
Projects that cost less.
Projects that take less time.
Assets that operate better.
16. DISCLAIMER
This presentation has been prepared by a representative of Advisian.
The presentation contains the professional and personal opinions of the presenter, which are given in good faith. As such, opinions presented herein may not always necessarily reflect the position of
Advisian as a whole, its officers or executive.
Any forward-looking statements included in this presentation will involve subjective judgment and analysis and are subject to uncertainties, risks and contingencies—many of which are outside the
control of, and may be unknown to, Advisian.
Advisian and all associated entities and representatives make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information in this document and do not take responsibility
for updating any information or correcting any error or omission that may become apparent after this document has been issued.
To the extent permitted by law, Advisian and its officers, employees, related bodies and agents disclaim all liability—direct, indirect or consequential (and whether or not arising out of the negligence,
default or lack of care of Advisian and/or any of its agents)—for any loss or damage suffered by a recipient or other persons arising out of, or in connection with, any use or reliance on this presentation or
information.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amrita Karunakaran
E amrita.karunakaran@advisian.com
Notes de l'éditeur
NPV – Net Present Value
Navigating the right final investment decision (FID) is complex with multiple factors to consider, many of which are inter related and have significant impact on one another.
To simplify though the factors can be roughly categorized into 4 main work streams:
Market access – description in presentation
Strategy - description in presentation
Siting - description in presentation
Financing - description in presentation
Same as before, at the end of the bullets ask the client how these points resonate with their financing approach.
The purpose of slides 9, 10 and 11 is to generate a discussion and start to narrow in on the customer issues.
Supporting Examples
Financing options: see xxxx
We’ve discussed the traditional approach, here’s the Advisian approach. Admittedly the client has lots of choice of who they work with when it comes to any one of these areas. However, they don’t have a lot of choice when it comes to someone who can help them with all of it, across the board. We have two main differentiators.
Diff #1 – Faster FID Decision
Features:
These areas are our core business. We have established practices and subject matter experts in each of these areas
We know the NAM landscape and have a massive network comprised of private equity, economic development partners, developers, competitors and customers in North America
Benefit:
We can offer you an integrated team that can advise on the optimal approach for all 4 areas at once. By working each work stream in parallel and then seamlessly feeding the results from one into the other we reduce the number of interfaces and third parties involved. Decisions can actually be made in parallel now instead of in series. So time to reach FID can be reduced by 6 to 12 months.
Diff #2 – The Right FID Decision
While speed is critical here, it’s not enough to just make fast decisions, you need to make the right decisions for this to benefit the client.
Features:
Our advise is practical and steeped in decades of experience actually building grass roots and brownfield industrial facilities right from the initial infrastructure through to start up
Benefit:
Unlike others who may advise you, we actually know the pitfalls, risks, and best practices that play out in real life, and how these need to be factored into your front end decision making in order to make the right FID and not face any surprises after the fact.