De spelregels van de publieke informatieruimte worden opnieuw geschreven. In deze presentatie nemen Frank Huysmans en Marina Noordegraaf je mee in de digitale wereld, waarin toegang tot informatie niet vanzelfsprekend is en soms wordt verzameld zonder dat je het weet.
De presentatie spoort kenniswerkers aan om positie te nemen en hun gebruikers de weg te wijzen naar hun rechten in een gedigitaliseerde maatschappij.
Geert van der Heijden legt uit hoe in het UMCU zoeken naar evidence wordt onderwezen aan studenten geneeskunde.
Zijn visie op het nut van MeSH, clinical queries en geaggregeerde evidence.
De spelregels van de publieke informatieruimte worden opnieuw geschreven. In deze presentatie nemen Frank Huysmans en Marina Noordegraaf je mee in de digitale wereld, waarin toegang tot informatie niet vanzelfsprekend is en soms wordt verzameld zonder dat je het weet.
De presentatie spoort kenniswerkers aan om positie te nemen en hun gebruikers de weg te wijzen naar hun rechten in een gedigitaliseerde maatschappij.
Geert van der Heijden legt uit hoe in het UMCU zoeken naar evidence wordt onderwezen aan studenten geneeskunde.
Zijn visie op het nut van MeSH, clinical queries en geaggregeerde evidence.
WEB&Z - 101 Innovations in Scholarly CommunicationBianca Kramer
The document discusses models of the research workflow and how it has evolved from a simple linear model to a more complex multi-cyclic model with loops representing iterations in the research process like grant writing, experimentation, and revising manuscripts. It also discusses goals for open science in terms of transparency, reproducibility and credit. Libraries can support changing research workflows by analyzing and comparing tools, presenting information to researchers, and advising on licensing and other decisions while considering researchers' perspectives.
Empirical librarianship - workshop KNVI congres 12 november 2015Bianca Kramer
De bibliotheek als onderzoeker - een actieve sessie waarin u aan het denken wordt gezet over het gebruik van onderzoek, hoe simpel of klein ook, bij het innoveren in bibliotheken.
Resultaten van de workshop zoals gehouden tijdens het KNVI congres op 12 november 2015 door Bianca Kramer en Jeroen Bosman.
Al het workshopmateriaal (handleiding en template kaartjes) is te downloaden via Figshare: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1619731
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - How can libraries support chang...Bianca Kramer
This document summarizes a presentation about supporting changing research workflows. It discusses how the traditional research workflow is cyclic in nature, involving preparation, analysis, writing, publication, outreach and assessment. It then presents results from a survey about tools researchers use, such as ResearcherID, Academia.edu and ResearchGate. The presentation examines both traditional and innovative research workflows, such as those embracing open science. It provides examples of how libraries can support researchers by reconsidering tools used in information literacy classes, assisting with licensing decisions, and comparing local practices to global data.
Small steps-big-opportunities-brussels-open-access-week-2015-kramer-bosman sl...Bianca Kramer
This document discusses moving from an open access model to an open science model for research. It presents increasingly complex models of the research workflow, showing how it is nonlinear and iterative. It identifies goals for open science around transparency, reproducibility and quality. It also discusses tools and platforms for open scholarly communication and survey results about researcher profiles and altmetrics. The key message is that research must transition from the current publisher-centered system to a more decentralized, open and publicly-funded model of self-regulation to better support open science.
The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the ne...Bianca Kramer
presented at the Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015
Science is in transition. If all goes well, the transition is towards more open, efficient and honest/reproducible practices. Libraries should move with this change by supporting open science instead of just open access. Building on their successful project "101 innovations in scholarly communication" Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer present their interpretations of what is going on and can be expected in the six phases of the research cycle. They have tested their hypothetical workflows and show how real, day-to-day research workflows are changing from traditional to modern, innovative and experimental. These changes are reflected in tools and sites people use in various phases of that workflow. They might for example change from Web of Science → SPSS → Word+Endnote → Nature → ResearcherID → Impact Factors to Sparrho → ROpenScience+IPythonNotebooks → WriteLateX+Docear → The Winnower → Kudos → Publons+PubPeer. The way new generations of researchers work affects how information will be discovered, re-used, created, shared, communicated and assessed. There are huge opportunities for libraries and other stakeholders to contribute and work with the research community, but only if they are well prepared!
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Zoeken voor systematic reviews SWI 121127 Bianca Kramer
WEB&Z - 101 Innovations in Scholarly CommunicationBianca Kramer
The document discusses models of the research workflow and how it has evolved from a simple linear model to a more complex multi-cyclic model with loops representing iterations in the research process like grant writing, experimentation, and revising manuscripts. It also discusses goals for open science in terms of transparency, reproducibility and credit. Libraries can support changing research workflows by analyzing and comparing tools, presenting information to researchers, and advising on licensing and other decisions while considering researchers' perspectives.
Empirical librarianship - workshop KNVI congres 12 november 2015Bianca Kramer
De bibliotheek als onderzoeker - een actieve sessie waarin u aan het denken wordt gezet over het gebruik van onderzoek, hoe simpel of klein ook, bij het innoveren in bibliotheken.
Resultaten van de workshop zoals gehouden tijdens het KNVI congres op 12 november 2015 door Bianca Kramer en Jeroen Bosman.
Al het workshopmateriaal (handleiding en template kaartjes) is te downloaden via Figshare: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1619731
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - How can libraries support chang...Bianca Kramer
This document summarizes a presentation about supporting changing research workflows. It discusses how the traditional research workflow is cyclic in nature, involving preparation, analysis, writing, publication, outreach and assessment. It then presents results from a survey about tools researchers use, such as ResearcherID, Academia.edu and ResearchGate. The presentation examines both traditional and innovative research workflows, such as those embracing open science. It provides examples of how libraries can support researchers by reconsidering tools used in information literacy classes, assisting with licensing decisions, and comparing local practices to global data.
Small steps-big-opportunities-brussels-open-access-week-2015-kramer-bosman sl...Bianca Kramer
This document discusses moving from an open access model to an open science model for research. It presents increasingly complex models of the research workflow, showing how it is nonlinear and iterative. It identifies goals for open science around transparency, reproducibility and quality. It also discusses tools and platforms for open scholarly communication and survey results about researcher profiles and altmetrics. The key message is that research must transition from the current publisher-centered system to a more decentralized, open and publicly-funded model of self-regulation to better support open science.
The good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the ne...Bianca Kramer
presented at the Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015
Science is in transition. If all goes well, the transition is towards more open, efficient and honest/reproducible practices. Libraries should move with this change by supporting open science instead of just open access. Building on their successful project "101 innovations in scholarly communication" Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer present their interpretations of what is going on and can be expected in the six phases of the research cycle. They have tested their hypothetical workflows and show how real, day-to-day research workflows are changing from traditional to modern, innovative and experimental. These changes are reflected in tools and sites people use in various phases of that workflow. They might for example change from Web of Science → SPSS → Word+Endnote → Nature → ResearcherID → Impact Factors to Sparrho → ROpenScience+IPythonNotebooks → WriteLateX+Docear → The Winnower → Kudos → Publons+PubPeer. The way new generations of researchers work affects how information will be discovered, re-used, created, shared, communicated and assessed. There are huge opportunities for libraries and other stakeholders to contribute and work with the research community, but only if they are well prepared!
What metrics? Altmetrics! (November 2014)Bianca Kramer
This document discusses alternative metrics (altmetrics) for measuring the impact of scholarly work beyond traditional citations. It mentions Bianca Kramer's work on altmetrics and provides links to resources on the altmetrics manifesto, changes in scientific communication like open access and new forms of peer review, limitations of altmetrics, and examples of individual altmetric profiles. The document aims to introduce altmetrics as a way to track whether scholarly findings are accepted, built upon, spread and cited, applied or purchased.
The Utrecht Approach - JIBS User group July 22 2014Bianca Kramer
The document discusses the Utrecht University library's approach to discovery and delivery of information. It summarizes trends showing that users are using search engines and other tools instead of library resources for discovery. The library concluded that it should stop developing a new discovery tool, keep the catalog for now, and focus on improving delivery by adding holdings to discovery tools, opening up repositories, and making authentication easier off-campus. The library's approach is to focus on delivery and continuously improve how it provides value wherever users do their searching.
Presentation on various developments in rapid reviews, inlcuding Cochrane Response and TRIP Rapid Reviews.
Presented at WEB&Z meeting (Dutch medical information specilists) November 28, 2013
Using RefWorks for Systematic Reviews (Sept 2013)Bianca Kramer
This document discusses using RefWorks, a citation management software, for systematic reviews. It provides an overview of how RefWorks can be used to identify, screen, and summarize evidence. The document shows the typical workflow of a systematic review in RefWorks, including searching the literature, deduplicating results, screening titles and abstracts, and critically appraising full texts. It also provides some tips and tricks for using RefWorks features like folders, output styles, and searching user fields to help manage the systematic review process.
What metrics? Altmetrics - October 2013Bianca Kramer
This document discusses alternative metrics (altmetrics) for measuring the impact of scholarly works. It provides several links to articles about the limitations of traditional citation-based metrics like the h-index and impact factor. The document advocates for altmetrics that track how research is accessed, discussed, applied or influential on social media platforms. It acknowledges limitations in altmetrics data quality, normalization, coverage and indicator quality. A link is provided for hands-on experience with altmetrics.
Presentatie over Altmetrics & Mendeley voor AIOTHO's (artsen in opleiding tot huisarts en onderzoeker) 29 november 2012
NB. Mendeley wordt niet uitbebreid behandeld in slides (ivm live demonstratie)
Quantitative comparison of search results in Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Presented with Eric Sieverts (@sieverts) at Internet Librarian International, October 30-31, London.
This document discusses the TRIP and SUMSearch search tools. TRIP provides curated searching across various sources of evidence-based medical information, from synopses to primary research. It allows the user to broaden or narrow the search across these different levels. SUMSearch is a meta-search tool that searches multiple sources, including guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary research from PubMed. It aims to provide quality searching across these evidence sources using filters to refine results when more than 100 are returned. The document notes some limitations to complex searching capabilities in SUMSearch.
8. Formuleren goede vraagstelling (PICO)
P – Patient or Population D – Domein
I/C – Intervention / Comparison D – Determinant
O – Outcome O – Outcome
Soort vraag: therapie, diagnose, prognose?
12. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Opbouw zoekstrategie
P I/C O
term term term
synoniem 1 synoniem 1 synoniem 1
13. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Opbouw zoekstrategie
P I/C O
term term term
OR synoniem 1 OR synoniem 1 OR synoniem 1
OR
synoniem 2 OR
synoniem 2 OR synoniem 2
OR OR OR OR
synoniem 3 synoniem 3 synoniem 3
OR
synoniem 4 synoniem 4 synoniem 4
OR OR
synoniem 5 synoniem 5 synoniem 5
OR OR OR
OR
… OR
… OR
…
AND AND
AND
14. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Opbouw zoekstrategie
Basisschema zoekstrategie:
Population AND Intervention AND Outcome
15. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Selectie juiste zoektermen
- expertise (ook: spellingsvarianten!)
- reeds bekende relevante publicaties
- trefwoorden (bv. MeSH)
-…
Zoek met vrije tekstwoorden (title/abstract) én trefwoorden
16. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Selectie juiste zoektermen
Trefwoorden (MeSH)
+ handmatig toegekend aan artikelen op basis van full-text
+ synoniemen ook meegenomen
- meest recente artikelen nog niet geïndexeerd
- MeSH Database wordt jaarlijks aangepast
- PubMed: automatische vertaling naar MeSH !!!
zoeken in velden: [tiab]
17. Systematische zoekactie in literatuurbronnen
Specificatie zoekstrategie
Limits: - vaak gebaseerd op MeSH !
(alleen taal / datum niet)
Clinical Queries: - therapy, diagnosis, prognosis etc.
- broad / narrow
- ook filter voor systematic reviews
18. Selectie gevonden artikelen (inclusie/exclusie)
Selecteren op basis van: - titel
- abstract 200 / uur ?
- full-text
Sneeuwbaleffect: - related citations (PubMed)
- citatiezoeken (Web of Science / Scopus)
- meta-analyses / systematic reviews:
- referenties checken
- zoekstrategie bekijken
Nieuwe referenties? Zoekstrategie aanpassen!