The document summarizes a Russian study estimating radionuclide emissions from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on March 15, 2011. The study estimates that approximately 100 quadrillion becquerels of cesium and 400 quadrillion becquerels of inert gases were released into the atmosphere in one day. This cesium release is about equal to Chernobyl's total release of 85 quadrillion becquerels. However, Fukushima's total cesium releases were higher as the study only considered atmospheric releases and not discharges into the ocean, which were up to 47 quadrillion becquerels. The document provides context on Chernobyl emissions estimates and criticism that Fukushima releases have been underestimated.
Fukushima released 100 quadrillion Becquerels of Deadly Cesium into Atmosphere… In just ONE day
1. LOCATION
MORE
HOME
Search ENENews
Register | Login
« Fukushima plant in national emergency says
governor — “Severe radioactive contamination with
serious health affects on local population” — ‘Global
intervention’ suggested
Bloomberg: Japan gov’t needs to understand crisis
at Fukushima is a matter of life and death — ABC
Interview: “They are slowly killing us… They know full
well it’s leaking, but they’ve done nothing” (AUDIO) »
Russian Study: Fukushima released 100 quadrillion
becquerels of cesium into atmosphere… In just ONE day —
About equal to Chernobyl’s total release
Published: August 29th, 2013 at 9:56 am ET
By ENENew s
Enenews
Like
18,563 people like Enenews .
Fac ebook soc ial plugin
Email Article
75 comments
Tw eet
Follow @ENENews
Estimation of radionuclide emission during the March 15, 2011 accident at the Fukushima-1 NPP
(Atomic Energy Journal Volume 112, Issue 3), July 2012:
“According to estimates made by the present authors, the following
radionuclides entered the atmosphere on March 15, 2011 (PBq): ~400 iodine,
~100 cesium, and ~400 inert gases.”
Enter your email address to receive DAILY UPDATES
via email every morning between 7a-9a ET:
Subscribe
TODAY'S MOST VIEWED
CEO: Fukushima is very bad, we have a crew in Japan
right now; Reports coming out that gov’t covered it
up… food around whole region got irradiated,
increased problems for people in Tokyo — Host:
Really scares me I don’t hear anyone discussing how
to stop it (VIDEO) (3,482)
Official detects radiation spike on California beach,
now at 500% normal levels — ‘Befuddled’ as to why
it’s so high, claims there’s no ‘immediate’ health
concern — Public’s interest in Fukushima nuclear
waste rising (VIDEO) (2,302)
Nuclear Engineer: Radioactive plumes always
coming out of Fukushima Unit 3 — “Water is not
getting to hotspots… it’s because of melted core” —
Fission may be taking place underneath reactor
(AUDIO) (745)
Wikipedia’s entry on Chernobyl states, “20 to 40% of all core caesium-137 was released, 85 PBq
in all.” The source cited is Chernobyl: Assessment of Radiological and Health Impact -Nuclear
Energy Agency (NEA)
The same source gives another amount for the Chernobyl release that is considerably less,
“However, more deposition data were available when, in their 1988 Report, the United Nations
Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) gave release figures based
not only on the Soviet data, but also on worldwide deposition. The total 137Cs release was
estimated to be 70 petabecquerels (PBq)” -Nuclear Energy Agency’s 2002 assessment of
the Chernobyl disaster
According to the Committee on an Assessment of CDC Radiation Studies, National Research
Council: “35 PBq of Cs-134 and 70 PBq of Cs-137 were released into the atmosphere” at
Chernobyl.
Fukushima’s total cesium releases are considerably higher than the 100 PBq stated in the July
2012 study, as that included only atmospheric releases and none of the plant’s record
discharges into the ocean (up to 47 quadrillion becquerels)… and it is only based on the amount
from a single day.
For more on Fukushima’s ocean releases see: Nuclear Engineer: Estimated 276 quadrillion Bq of
Cs-137 entered Fukushima basements -- Triple Chernobyl total release -- A portion "has already
made its way to aquifer, whence it can easily flow into sea"
Published: August 29th, 2013 at 9:56 am ET
By ENENew s
Nuclear Expert: Fukushima reactor cores melted right
down into the ground — That radioactive material is
getting washed out into Pacific Ocean (AUDIO) (623)
Biologist finds pink salmon that are canary yellow on
Canada’s Pacific coast — Insides also yellow: Heart
parts, gill arches, spines, cartilage in head —
Spleens swollen, livers spotted, some with buggedout eyes (PHOTOS) (551)
Search
LATEST HEADLINES
CEO: Fukushima is very bad, we have a crew in Japan
right now; Reports coming out that gov’t covered it
up… food around whole region got irradiated,
increased problems for people in Tokyo — Host:
Really scares me I don’t hear anyone discussing how
to stop it (VIDEO)
Official detects radiation spike on California beach,
now at 500% normal levels — ‘Befuddled’ as to why
it’s so high, claims there’s no ‘immediate’ health
concern — Public’s interest in Fukushima nuclear
waste rising (VIDEO)
Expert: Source informed me that areas by U.S. nuclear
2. plants are becoming ‘seismically active’; Studies
underway right now — NRC ‘Official Use Only’:
Quakes can actually happen almost anywhere
(AUDIO)
Email Article
75 comments
Like ENENew s on Facebook
Follow ENENew s on Tw itter
Subscribe to the ENENew s RSS Feed
Sign up for daily email updates
Nuclear Engineer: Radioactive plumes always
coming out of Fukushima Unit 3 — “Water is not
getting to hotspots… it’s because of melted core” —
Fission may be taking place underneath reactor
(AUDIO)
Related Posts
1. EU-funded Research: Fukushima atmospheric release of 210 quadrillion becquerels of
cesium-137 used as upper bound in simulation — Chernobyl estimated at 70 to 85
quadrillion September 23, 2013
2. Study: Up to 47 quadrillion becquerels of cesium-137 released into Pacific from Fukushima
— Nearly 50 times original Tepco estimate March 12, 2013
3. RT: Fukushima amounts to four Chernobyls of cesium-137 contamination May 24, 2012
4. Japan Professor compares cesium-137 releases from radiation disasters: Fukushima at up
to 77 quadrillion Bq (77 PBq); Chernobyl at 85 quadrillion Bq (85 PBq) — Fukushima
releases ongoing August 27, 2013
5. Nuclear Engineer: Estimated 276 quadrillion Bq of Cs-137 entered Fukushima basements
— Triple Chernobyl total release — A portion “has already made its way to aquifer, whence
it can easily flow into sea” August 26, 2013
Senior Scientist: Fukushima cores melted through the
containment vessels — I’m very concerned about sea
life on West Coast accumulating radioactive material;
Some contamination will arrive in concentrated
pockets (AUDIO)
Top Russian Nuclear Official: Fukushima catastrophe
matched our worst-case scenario — U.S. Gov’t Email:
Radiation release thought to be 500 times higher than
we calculated
Wall St. Journal: Plutonium levels 1,000 times normal
on seafloor 50 miles from San Francisco — Expert
Appalled: Major nuclear dump offshore is a threat to
health — Around 50,000 containers of radioactive
waste in globally significant ecosystem
August 29th, 2013 | Category: Chernobyl Comparisons, Fukushima Daiichi, Japan (Fukushima)
Nuclear Expert: Fukushima reactor cores melted right
down into the ground — That radioactive material is
getting washed out into Pacific Ocean (AUDIO)
« Fukushima plant in national emergency says
governor — “Severe radioactive contamination with
serious health affects on local population” — ‘Global
intervention’ suggested
LATEST COMMENTS
Bloomberg: Japan gov’t needs to understand crisis
at Fukushima is a matter of life and death — ABC
Interview: “They are slowly killing us… They know full
well it’s leaking, but they’ve done nothing” (AUDIO) »
4:33 AM EST, Jan 05
Philadelphia, PA 150 CPM (private
geiger, most likely, so 150 CPM is very...
NoNukes
75 comments to Russian Study: Fukushima released 100 quadrillion
becquerels of cesium into atmosphere… In just ONE day — About
equal to Chernobyl’s total release
Comment on FORUM: Post Your Radiation
Monitoring Data Here
4:29 AM EST, Jan 05
Pennsylvania 111 CPM (I have seen up to
138 CPM right now) Radiation...
NoNukes
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 10:18 am Log in to Reply
Japan still has not responded to South Korea’s request for radiation data.
http://enformable.com/2013/08/japan-still-responded-south-koreas-requestradiation-data/
Comment on FORUM: Post Your Radiation
Monitoring Data Here
4:27 AM EST, Jan 05
Just in case you have any doubt that the
United States has known...
brainheart
Comment on FORUM: General Disc ussion
Thread (Nuc lear Issues)
4:26 AM EST, Jan 05
Report comment
AllenH
Comment on Offic ial detec ts radiation spike on
California beac h, now at 500% normal levels --...
hbjon
August 29, 2013 at 1:12 pm Log in to Reply
In other news….Fire is still hot. Sky is blue. Tepco still lies.
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 6:36 pm Log in to Reply
Japan owes that data to THE WHOLE WORLD. And don't know if the U.N.
has any spine these days, but if it does it needs to condemn Japan as an
outlaw nation, and issue arrest warrants to drag people off to The Haag.
Killing millions of people (animals, plants, everything) now and in the future is just "fine"
because Japan is "the third largest economy in the world"?? That in itself is a complete
accounting fraud by now. That nation is GONE!! And any claim to MORALITY is gone.
This is an outlaw nation and sanctions should be applied.
Unfortunately, the United States will in no way be taking the lead. To the contrary. In
fact, what we fear is some new deadly diversion because "people were going to die
anyway, and now we don't even have to talk about it." it's becoming dangerous for a lot
more reasons than just radiation.
Report comment
4:17 AM EST, Jan 05
It will take world peace to fix clean and
repair this mess or...
ELKdog
Comment on CEO: Fukushima is very bad, we
have a c rew in Japan right now;...
4:13 AM EST, Jan 05
More and more articles are being posted
on the Google news page and...
brainheart
Comment on FORUM: General Disc ussion
Thread (Nuc lear Issues)
4:11 AM EST, Jan 05
According to this article, the workers are
setting up the equipment to freeze...
brainheart
Comment on FORUM: General Disc ussion
Thread (Nuc lear Issues)
4:07 AM EST, Jan 05
Remember the Hope Ranch Webcam?
ABC News had a story about Yoshizawa
http://www.abc. net.au/news/201 4-0104/fukushi ma-cowboy-wont- slaughtercattl e-despite-white -spots/5184684
brainheart
Comment on FORUM: Fukushima Webc am
Disc ussion Thread
3:33 AM EST, Jan 05
"An ominous edict issued from the Office
of the President of Russia today...
3. of the President of Russia today...
16Penny
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 10:23 am Log in to Reply
We wonder what day it was that #3 exploded and released massive amounts of
radiation? How much was released THAT day?
They more than likely picked the day when the LEAST amount was coming out, and used that
to plug into a computer, to come up with the lowest possible number possible.
Comment on Nuc lear Engineer: Radioac tive
plumes always c oming out of Fukushima Unit 3 -- "Water...
3:27 AM EST, Jan 05
Denver, and the state of Colorado have
Granit mountains. Granit is natural
scintillation...
Ontological
Comment on CEO: Fukushima is very bad, we
have a c rew in Japan right now;...
First the 'experts' proclaim FUKU is only 10% of Chernobyl..
Now they say it is close to Chernobyl, but still no worse…
Anyone saying something like this is still guessing, and not counting the total amount released
to groundwater, ocean, air, etc, on purpose, in order to make it look much better than it
actually is.
>> Comment Archive
DISCUSSION THREADS
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(379 Comments)
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear
Issues) (9,493 Comments)
Report comment
newsblackoutUSA
August 29, 2013 at 10:53 am Log in to Reply
Hi Dr. here is a link to Foia documents with details how the disaster went
down with diagrams supplied by Japanese. It has the timeline, explosion
pictures, meltdowns etc.
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1121/ML11216A083.pdf
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear
Issues) (9,699 Comments)
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(6,143 Comments)
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean,
renewable energy sources (537 Comments)
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature
Drives (VIDEO) (263 Comments)
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, &
demonstrations about energy issues (515
Comments)
The report starts on page 61.
Report comment
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning
radioactive debris? (347 Comments)
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its
effects (1,313 Comments)
MichaelV
August 29, 2013 at 11:38 am Log in to Reply
That, was a big download…
Report comment
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation (672
Comments)
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies —
Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth,
etc. (1,852 Comments)
>> See All Discussion Threads
bo
August 29, 2013 at 11:53 am Log in to Reply
Yeah totally
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS
Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
Type in form below and click 'submit':
Report comment
bo
August 29, 2013 at 12:14 pm Log in to Reply
Totally… that was reply to the alligator croco discussion
analogy, somehow my post got tacked onto the wrong thread
CAPTCHA Code:
Submit
Report comment
LIVE FEEDS
TEPCO and TBS Webcams
MichaelV
August 29, 2013 at 12:29 pm Log in to Reply
RECEIVE OCCASIONAL ENENEWS NEWSLETTERS
You're on turbo moving between pages…
Name
E-mail
Report comment
Subscribe
SUPPORT ENENEWS
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:02 pm Log in to Reply
What a bunch of hooey…
For #3, it lists nothing more than a hydrogen explosion, just like the rest.
ENENews rec eives no funding from anyone or anything, exc ept
1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google,
who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated
or are planning on doing so, it's nic e to know people apprec iate
your work.
4. For #3, it lists nothing more than a hydrogen explosion, just like the rest.
Good coverup job, with no mention of radiation released, spreading plutonium all
over the place, out into the ocean, etc..
Kind of interesting, it shows Japanese and US military in there putting water on
FUKU.
Never saw that one before.
Which US military? Were US troops involved in being on site?
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:09 pm Log in to Reply
For spent fuel pools, even though they admit water level fell below
tops of fuel rods, the temperature of these pools never went up
much.
No fires, no drying out of any of them is admitted…
Again, lots of white washing and minimization; as much as they can get away
with and not be called on it, because no one is going to check their facts and
live to tell about it.
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:14 pm Log in to Reply
No plutonium detected ANYWHERE, other than from atomic
testing levels.
Convenient.. fits right in with the steam explosion story..
Nothing came out of anything, no radioactive fires anywhere, no coriums
going underground..
Voila; 10% of Chernobyl maximum.
How sweet it is.. lots of raises and promotions all around.
We saved humanity with a computer program estimate and a Powerpoint
presentation, showing how it REALLY was.
We can all go home now. Shut down ENENEWS. No need for it anymore.
Problems have all been solved. Everything is back to normal.
NOT!
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:18 pm Log in to Reply
Just this much, makes us look at everything else in the
report with great suspicion, distrust and basically, well,
DISBELIEF.
If they cannot even get the basic facts right, everything else that
follows from there, well it has got to be made up somehow.
But knowing how this all works, most of the world will believe
everything in this report and think the world is just peachy keen, and
almost no radiation came out of FUKU… especially no plutonium.
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:59 pm Log in to Reply
What Really Happened at Fukushima? via
5. @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-really-happenedat-fukushima.html
Report comment
newsblackoutUSA
August 29, 2013 at 4:43 pm Log in to Reply
Dr. did you have a chance to see the part
where the NRC inspectors were hiding the
Iodine-131 found in milk and they didn't report it. It was an
email on page 41.
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 1:55 pm Log in to Reply
Dr.G, your website also did an AMAZING article
about plutonium release. It think it was Paolo
Scampa's work. Re-post the link for people to find.
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 6:42 pm Log in to Reply
Dr. G, PattieB has been saying for a long time that there
are NUCLEAR BOMB FACTORIES under reactors 3 and
I believe 4. That would certainly account for the MUSHROOMSHAPED CLOUD when that explosion happened!!!
MOX fuel was supposed to be ILLEGAL in Japan. See also Yoichi
Shimatsu who claims that Shinzo Abe personally was right in the
middle of bringing the MOX fuel into Japan, along with the Cheney
cabal.
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 30, 2013 at 1:30 pm Log in to Reply
May very well be..
They are very good at hiding things.
The nuclear industry has been keeping secrets for many years
now.
When you get that good at something, you are not going to
give up on it easily.
Liars who lie often enough, end up believing their own lies.
They will attack anyone who disagrees and label them fear
mongers, or worse.
What happens when you try to expose a narcissist?
Report comment
unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:08 pm Log in to
Reply
At least we won't have to worry about burying
all these dead liars.
Won't anybody be burying anybody when this thing takes
6. Won't anybody be burying anybody when this thing takes
its toll.
Somehow running out of toilet paper doesn't seem like
such a big deal anymore.
Report comment
simonhhh
January 3, 2014 at 2:15 pm Log in to Reply
We Not They Finally…Well said…Now we are
getting close to the truth…
Report comment
MichaelV
August 29, 2013 at 11:24 am Log in to Reply
So we're having dinner in our kitchen, the children are behaving, and the food is
excellent.
Right then, a 12ft reptile comes onto the back porch and slithers into the midst of our meal.
We all jump up and start a heated argument over whether it's an alligator, or a crocodile…?
Report comment
Songie
August 29, 2013 at 11:38 am Log in to Reply
@MichaelIV…LOL, exactly!!
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 11:43 am Log in to Reply
Well if one person in the family represents and works for top level TEP corp,
it would probably be an argument on his side about; it was nothing more
than a small lizard, versus a 12 foot reptile that actually bit and tried to eat people, for
those who actually witnessed it…
Of course, those who got eaten get no say in the matter
Report comment
MichaelV
August 29, 2013 at 12:20 pm Log in to Reply
The children, hence our future, are vulnerable to immediate harm.
Could they finally building a utopia by murdering billions of people who are in the
way?
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 6:37 pm Log in to Reply
They cannot ever even return to the surface that way! More likely
they are just criminally deranged.
Report comment
7. unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:19 pm Log in to Reply
The TEP family reunion dinner alligator event:
Dad: Smile and be happy!
Mom: It won't eat you if you are happy!
Son: You tell it dad!
Daughter: Lie to it, daddy!
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 11:40 am Log in to Reply
FUKUSHIMA SOLUTION 1: Stop Inflowing Groundwater
Build the Impermeable Wall inland from where it starts beside Reactor1.
Run inland to a place well behind Reactor1.
Turn left, and extend Wall behind (inland from) Reactors1-4.
Completed Impermeable Wall will form a rectangle completely surrounding Reactors1-4.
This will block the groundwater from entering the area under the reactors, where it becomes
contaminated.
The 1,000 tonnes of uncontaminated inflowing groundwater per day that enters the FDNPP
will be diverted by the Impermeable Wall into the harbor.
This will take the place of the Frozen Wall, which will no longer be necessary.
This is not rocket science. This is water.
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 11:49 am Log in to Reply
FUKUSHIMA SOLUTION 2: Move Water Storage Offshore
Oh, and while we're at it, bring in double walled barge tanks. Park them in
harbor, and transfer ALL the contaminated water from those tanks and ponds to the
barges. Take the filled barges out to sea, filter out the nuclear nasties, and dump them
into the Trench. Probably, you will want to pump the filtered water deep down in the
Trench, rather then have it float on the ocean surface, where it will cause trouble. You
will need a separate barge for the filtration operation, and probably a small ship to
serve as crew quarters. Couple of tugboats to move the barges around. Let's get right
on this one. OK?
Report comment
scottyji
August 29, 2013 at 12:05 pm Log in to Reply
Good ideas.
However, fresh water is less dense than sea water. If you pump it down,
its tendency will be to rise to the surface. Mixing it first with some sea water and
then pumping it down will have more of the desired result you propose.
I appreciate your "solutions-based" comments in this forum.
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 12:07 pm Log in to Reply
FUKUSHIMA SOLUTION 3: Closed Loop Heat Sink
Install two lines of groundwater wells inside the Impermeable Wall
Rectangle, in a line along the harbor, with a second line of wells running behind
(inland from) Reactors1-4. (The line of wells behind Reactors1-4 is already in
place.).
Cooling towers for this system can go where the tank farm is currently located.
Cooled water can be circulated into Containments1-3, as needed.
Excess cooled water can be injected using the line of wells behind Reactors1-4.
Of course, the line of wells along the harbor extracts groundwater for cooling and
filtration.
8. The groundwater level inside the Impermeable Wall can be controlled by adding or
removing water.
Filtration of the water in the Closed Loop Heat Sink system may be necessary to
keep it from fissioning.
The need for a Closed Loop Heat Sink has often been mentioned by Arnie
Gundersen, BTW. Great idea, Arnie!
Report comment
MoonlightEmpire
August 29, 2013 at 8:52 pm Log in to Reply
Though I'm sure a better system can be built, the ALPS system for
filtering/decontaminating water at Daiichi has been an utter failure. At
perfect conditions, it can only filter about half of the nuclides from the water, the
rest stays. ALPS is a very expensive system, and hasn't even come close to
operation, let alone peak efficiency.
So the idea of filtering the water on the barges is out until a tested and proven
system can be developed.
Further, no water must ever be pumped into the ocean, filtered or not. That type of
thinking just perpetuates the mentality that got the world into this situation. The
Earth is not humanities dumping ground. The plants and animals of the planet are
not here for humanities whims. We are supposed to be symbiotic. The fact alone
that anyone would consider dumping anything into the trench off the coastline
shows poor judgement and lack of understanding.
All contaminated water–every last drop–must be brough INLAND and managed
thoroughly and appropriately. Hey, if it takes five thousand acres of tanks to hold
F-Daiichi's contaminated water for 100K years, then so be it. Then, and only then,
will the people wake up and realize what they have done. Then we will see change.
If you dump this water in the ocean, there will be no evidence of what has
happened. The perpetrators will go free. Over time, billions-not millions-of people
will die from this. Humanity: Face the consequences or seal your fate.
Report comment
21stCentury
August 29, 2013 at 9:26 pm Log in to Reply
@MoonlightEmpire…
Do you know how much uranium & thorium was put into seawater by Mother
Nature ??
please take a moment and read this…
http://web.ornl.gov/info/press_releases/get_press_release.cfm?
ReleaseNumber=mr20120821-00
the ocean's estimated 4.5 billion tons of uranium. Although dissolved uranium
exists in concentrations of just 3.2 parts per billion, the sheer volume means
there would be enough to "safely store the entire world inventory of radcrap, if
properly mineralized into chemically stable vitrified compounds"
[my quotes]
since the beginning of time, all life on earth has evolved in balance with a
really scary amount of naturally occurring radioisotopes
..no, I'm not in favor of sloppy ocean dumping, I'm a fisherman and own
waterfront oyster clam kelp-beds holothurian stichopus aquaculture, and
demo'd the original method of geoduck clam aquaculture.
The uranium mining industry knows how to extract the radwaste out of
Fukuradwater..
the technology is getting better every week..
A crash program building a bunch of bigger breakwaters outside the small
existing one at Fuku is extremely important.
The ocean is more resilient than you think, it's not HolyWater.
Report comment
9. obewanspeaks
August 29, 2013 at 9:51 pm Log in to Reply
A nature's solution or is it only a part of the coming Nuclear
Radiation Contamination plague..
http://optimalprediction.com/wp/radiation-eating-fungi-they-kill-trees-andthey-kill-people/
Some people think fungus/fungi are the cause of cancer..
http://www.google.com/search?
client=safari&rls=en&q=cancer+is+a+fungus&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
So lets see cancer was like 1% in 1930 and it's now 50%+ in the year
2012 and what is the cause?
The newest form of technology found on this planet is Nuclear
Technology!
Most of the people living in Japan today and now those
downwind/downstream will die from Cancer too!
More fungus! Bring me More Fungus for everybody.. including Bobby!
Report comment
flatsville
August 30, 2013 at 6:19 am Log in to Reply
You sound positively gleeful that you believe nearly
everyone will die of cancer.
Glad you're enjoying yourself.
And while the good doctor's bobby's blog post on fungus may be
worthwhile reading, your endorsement of it as doomporn just makes
it appear to be junk to those who may come here for serious info
Report comment
unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:35 pm Log in to Reply
There were useful bits of info in the link, and I just
read it for a few glancing moments so far.
Useful: In the aftermath of cesium radiation release, you must
be careful to avoid burning oak tree bark.
Practical use: Peel your oak bark from your firewood to prevent
radiation injuries. You must do so without creating any dust, or
inhaling any at all. I think Obewanspeaks is just basking in the
total absurdity of his environment.
This is your brain.
Photo: Egg
This is your brain on drugs.
Photo: Egg frying
This is you brain on cataclysmic extinction level event:
Photo: Obewanspeaks.
Give the guy a break. The Japanese said be happy, already!
Report comment
MoonlightEmpire
August 29, 2013 at 11:19 pm Log in to Reply
21st: I'm aware of the huge amounts of naturally occuring
radioactive elements on the planet, but thanks for the
interesting link, though I wouldn't ever support the idea it presents…If
there is 3.2 ppb of naturally occuring uranium in the oceans, then good,
so be it….leave it there. These companies are again looking at the
natural resources of the Earth as things to be exploited for personal
gains. As long as we keep this mentality, we will not succeed. Imagine
how much water you have to "skim" through their "filters" in order to
10. accumulate the quantities of uranium they are talking about in the article.
That's a lot of water to be squeezing through a fine mesh. There are
billions of living organisms in a teaspoon of rich compost…and similar
with ocean water.
If the technology is so good and getting better all the time for extracting
radwastes from Fuku-like water, then that's all the more reason for every
last drop to be stored inland on TEPCO owned property if necessary
until it is all made pure and drinkable by infants according to pre 1800AD
standards. I don't believe the technology is that good. If it is, then what
are we all fussing about?
I do support your mention of multiple breakwaters. They need many, and
they need to be very large. The one they have is barely still there (the
tsunami destroyed it).
And yes, the ocean is resilient, but again, that is no excuse for
admonishable behaviors.
Report comment
21stCentury
August 30, 2013 at 4:33 pm Log in to Reply
MoonlightEmpire: We don't have time to argue over
which end of the egg to crack first..
OK fine, if you want to be stubborn about not one drop in the ocean,
you can go ahead and begin your upland campaign.
Yeah, your plan is a better plan if we had 5 more years to fiddlefuk
with it you might get your project completed..
I have fought a few fires in my time, forest fires, house fires, vehicle
fires, shipyard fires in drydocks, vessel fires at sea in a storm, and
large industrial foundry fires..
TEPCO failed in their upland campaign, their collection of tanks are
too heavy for the ground support on that hillside parkinglot.
Any kind of upland water project is riddled with nearly as much risks
of spillage into the ocean as just putting it on good solid inspected
double hulled chemical tanker ships guarded by the Navy.
Putting it on tankerships could be done in a week..
..I have my doubts the spent fuel pools will last another week…
each minute that goes by without another damaging event is a
miracle in this ongoing mess.
TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
it's not a perfect world, we all survive by making snap decisions
when the chips are down
Report comment
unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:42 pm Log in to Reply
"Putting it on tankerships could be done in a week.."
That would ruin the whole plan — fiddling while the world is
burning.
Report comment
maxli
August 30, 2013 at 12:35 am Log in to Reply
@21stCentury, you are comparing apples to bananas.
How much caesium, strontium, plutonium and of all the numerous other
highly active and poisonous reactor fission, transmutation and decay
products was put into seawater by Mother Nature? Or better – how much
of it has Father Time left behind after some billion years?
Report comment
11. Report comment
scottyji
August 30, 2013 at 3:59 pm Log in to Reply
@ 21stcentury =
Au contraire mon frere! The oceans ARE 'Holy Water' and here's why
per National Geographic =
"Source of Half Earth's Oxygen Gets Little Credit…Phytoplankton are at
the base of what scientists refer to as oceanic biological productivity, the
ability of a water body to support life such as plants, fish, and wildlife
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytop
lankton.html
Report comment
davidh7426
August 29, 2013 at 12:29 pm Log in to Reply
Solution 1 – Your talking about building a 'coffer dam', I'm sure TEPCO
have a good reason for not building one, but for the life of me I can't figure
out what it would be.
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 1:31 pm Log in to Reply
Cofferdam IS being constructed right now, David. Which is good news.
They call it the "Impermeable Wall".
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2013/07/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-contaminated.html
The bad news is that they are building it only half way around Reactors1-4.
The bad news is that as they build it, groundwater backs up behind the wall, and
begins to flood the buildings.
(Perhaps they should have started building this wall behind and uphill from
Reactors1-4, then worked on the harborside part last.)
Report comment
davidh7426
August 29, 2013 at 2:06 pm Log in to Reply
So it's a dam, not a coffer-dam. They truly are insane…
I don't know who the engineering genius is who suggested this 'cock-up' but
would someone please take him out behind one of the reactors and knock
some sense into him, preferable with something large and blunt.
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 6:57 pm Log in to Reply
PhilipUpNorth, you are obviously a smart guy, but why be so Johnny-OneNote about impermeable walls? The one they built already
CATACLYSMICALLY FAILED!!!The water goes UNDER the wall to the sea. It is also
about to go OVER the wall. And what the wall held back has hyper-saturated the land
to the point that what is left of the complex will all fall down.
Impermeable Wall is not good news, Philip! It is BAD news! It is VERY bad news! Please
stop pushing it!
Report comment
12. Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 11:46 am Log in to Reply
Yea, but it will cost lots and lots of money do all of this..
There is no money.
They barely have enough $$ for used metal/plastic tanks, duct tape and baling wire as it is.
Who wants to dump money into a black hole.
It is much easier and cheaper to ignore it, deny it is happening, and walk away from it.
Plus very profitable, because as people get sick, the medical side of the nuclear industry
makes $$$$ mucho mucho…
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 11:48 am Log in to Reply
Good idea by the way…
Then tunnel underneath and seal off from below.
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 12:26 pm Log in to Reply
"Seal off from below." Great idea. You could use the Frozen Wall
technology to seal off the reactors from below. Drill, using a slantwise
drilling machine, and freeze the ground underneath the reactors, perhaps put a
horizontal frozen wall at the very bottom of the Impermeable Wall. Freeze the
corium, too, if any remains within reach.
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 1:49 pm Log in to Reply
Repost from The Blue Light, who recommends using epoxy to
create the hirizontal barrier at the bottom of the Impermeable Wall:
"October 3, 2012 at 7:17 pm · Reply
"Hi Anne, hope you are well.
"I didn't explain it too well. We can steer the cutting head on a drilling rig to
drill in the horizontal. As for the epoxy barrier when the oil companies do
frakking they pump in fluid, at pressure, to fracture the rock. In this case the
fluid is epoxy, we pump it in and then leave it to set, job done. you then move
forward ten feet or so and do it again until you have gone 'all around the
houses' so to speak. If you want a thicker barrier then you just drill ten feet
further down. Think concrete but held together with epoxy instead of cement.
"As for finding the cores, seismic mapping has been used for finding ancient
ruins, water, oil, gas, ore bodies etc. for decades, you could also use thermal
terrain mapping. Its not down some mile deep hole there is nowhere near
enough energy in the, once melted now solid, coriums to do that. If they did,
the whole building would have fallen in after it by now. Speaking as a physicist
who's specialism was criticality my bet would be that the coriums are 15 feet
under the containment, +/- 5 feet and +/- 10 feet north, east, south or west.
Sadly we wont find out for some time. Perhaps we could start a pool on its
where abouts.
"Good night all."
Many thanks, The Blue Light.
Report comment
21stCentury
August 29, 2013 at 2:35 pm Log in to Reply
start a pool on its where abouts… it might be possible to use
our best uranium fracking/mining technology combined with
13. our best geothermal technology to start generating power again from
those lost orphan coriums ??
making lemonade from rotten lemons (;-P)
all the rotten bastards that make messes like this should be asswhooped..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rjpxz_bFQg
We start at the top..
http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-mark-leibovich-on-americasgilded-capital/
Report comment
We Not They Finally
August 29, 2013 at 7:02 pm Log in to Reply
Philip, the impermeable wall has already CATACLYSMICALLY
FAILED!! Please stop pushing a failed idea. It gives people
hope with no reality. It's not helpful.
Report comment
unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:12 pm Log in to Reply
…and by the time they build the wall around Fukushima
Daichi, it's only purpose would be to keep radiation from
getting IN.
Report comment
21stCentury
August 29, 2013 at 2:18 pm Log in to Reply
@PhilipUpNorth.. watch this viddy – click on pic..
http://www.youralaskalink.com/news/After-the-Wave-Rebuilding-JapansEnergy-Policy-193166901.html
The best way to build your solid concrete wall cofferdam is to use 2-parallel
ice-walls to be the cement forms. You will run into time delays if you try to use
traditional hardware cement forms.
The best way to supply sustained refrigeration over a long period of time is to
use the icewalls for LNG-regasification.
Fuku1 is an ideal location to rapidly develop into a LNG import and
powerplant facility.
#1-a priority is drain the onshore tanks into barges&ships for treatment and
deep drilled injection disposal. Pressurewashed but still contaminated solid
materials can be carefully planted in discrete piles in the bottom of Japan
Trench, then covered & backfilled with electronic monitor fiberoptic telemetry.
#1-b priority is build another outer breakwater-seawall adding another ring of
water-dam offshore. Keep building seawalls building an outer harbor.
HDD-drilling can install Flexsteel pipe in a grid-work floor underneath the
reactors. Flexsteel standard-pipe is earthquakeproof down to -100F subzero
cold. Modified HDPE copolymer-resin can make it shatterproof down to -260F
LNG-cryogenic service.
http://www.flexsteelpipe.com/
Flexible insulated cryopipe is easy to use too…
http://www.permapipe.com/Productcatalog/Details/67
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 11:53 am Log in to Reply
14. Might as well dump all of the reactors down in the Trench too, while we are at it,
plus all of the stuff from the SFP's. Just get a big sky crane helicopter or big fleet
of them, lift the whole mess up and dump into the trench. Basta, done.
Bottom line, this is ILLEGAL, per international agreements.
Sorry no can do on this dumping radioactive water in the trench idea either.
The nuke industry has been dumping stuff in the ocean for decades..
Report comment
unincredulous
November 22, 2013 at 12:46 pm Log in to Reply
If mankind had a working star gate, the other end of the wormhole would be
a garbage dump.
Report comment
flatsville
August 29, 2013 at 11:56 am Log in to Reply
Kong-Rey update anyone?
On mobile device which often stink for map abd tracking purposes.
Report comment
flatsville
August 29, 2013 at 12:23 pm Log in to Reply
Best I can do on small mobile
http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/western-pacific/2013/Tropical-Storm-Kong-rey
Looks like glancing blow from th west?
Report comment
jackassrig
August 29, 2013 at 12:02 pm Log in to Reply
Don't talk to loud or the teachers of crap at MIT will hear you.
Report comment
ftlt
August 29, 2013 at 12:04 pm Log in to Reply
I'm having trouble calling this the worst disaster..
Think the first successful test at White Sands of the bomb may have it… Given to what it lead
to….
Meanwhile, we are off to bomb a country for using chemical weapons (both sides are – the
Turks busted rebels transporting it into Syria too – there are reports of rebel forces using it in
country)… Great!!! Let Freedom Ring – Bhaa Humbug!!! Phsst!!
The Empire/s are behind this FUFU disaster; they supply horrible weapons worldwide for
conflict (refuse to sign limitation agreements for them (thermobarics, cluster munitions, mines,
etc.); they protect the nuclear industry top to bottom; they are plundering the earth for quick
profits regardless of the damage done to the earth and life on it and on and on…
FUFU is just a poster child for what these arch criminal mass murderers are on about!!!
JUST SAY NO TO NEOLIBERALISM.. It is everywhere you turn…
Report comment
15. ftlt
August 29, 2013 at 12:13 pm Log in to Reply
https://www.google.com/search?
q=thermobaric&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=NXAfUtqiDOKnigLDxYDACA&v
ed=0CDYQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=709
The above is FREEDOM!!! Freedom to use on men, woman and children innocent at
Fallujah or Gaza or wherever resistance is found… Is Syria next target of the Empire/s
forces or is it going to be Detroit or Cleveland or your hometown????
Report comment
ftlt
August 29, 2013 at 12:18 pm Log in to Reply
You think, I'm being silly… Remember, the security forces bomb attack
on MOVE HQ in 1985 in Philly that destroyed 65 homes and killing 11
including 5 children…
Let Freedom Ring!!!
Report comment
TheBigPicture
August 29, 2013 at 12:10 pm Log in to Reply
Plutonium is being released continuously into the air, water, and oceans, from this
nuclear disaster. Your kids lungs are at stake.
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:21 pm Log in to Reply
Oooo contrar… mi amon.
TEPCO says in the official report with link above, that NO PLUTONIUM was released or
detected.
They are the experts and we must BELIEVE.
Report comment
truthseek
August 29, 2013 at 1:07 pm Log in to Reply
No dammit, we are going to get happy and smile a lot and the radiation
cannot hurt us… Pass the bong please. They must be stoned and immune
to the forces, it escapes them because the are .h.a.p.p.y.
Report comment
Gasser
August 29, 2013 at 1:25 pm Log in to Reply
The control rods from Fukushima
Tall and Zirconium clad young and MOX deadly,
the control rod's from Dieichie goes emitting
And when she passes,
each one she passes goes
aggggggah!
When she emitting,
she's like Godzilla that swings so hot
and sways so Plutoniumly
That when she passes,
16. each one she passes goes
ELE!!!
(Ooholy shit)
But I watch her so sadly,
how can I tell her I hate her
No I would not give my heart gladly,
But each day, when she leaks to the sea
She floods straight ahead, at you and me
Tall, and brittle,
and dangerous, and deadly,
the control rod's from Fukushmia goes radiating
And when she radiates,
I cry – but TEPCO doesn't see
doesn't see…….
They just don't see,
they never see,……
Repeat and die slowly
Fade
Report comment
Sickputer
August 29, 2013 at 12:20 pm Log in to Reply
We know this much…Fukushima Daiichi's six reactors and the Common Spent Fuel
Pond contains millions of pounds of nuclear fuel, including pure plutonium in the
French MOX fuel rods and the massive amounts of plutonium created over 40 years of
operation . Some has flown the coop. An enormous amount remains in buildings and the
ground around the island and probably all of it is going to be beyond human efforts to get it
contained. At best they might with a 10 trillion dollar effort stop the ocean releases. Maybe.
Looking long-term the other nuclear plants in Japan hold new horrors just like so many in
America, Russia. France, UK, China, India, and dozens more wannabes who fell prey to the
allure of "electricity too cheap to measure".
For example:
"As of the end of 2011, Japan had a stockpile of about 44 tons of separated plutonium: nine
tons in Japan and 35 tons in France and the UK…. Japan could,in a decade or so, be the
owner of about 100 tons of separated plutonium. Today, the total global stockpile of
separated civilian plutonium is about 250 tons. Including weapons
plutonium, about 70 tons of which has been declared excess, raises the total to about 500
tons.
http://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2
F%2Ffissilematerials.org%2Flibrary%2FJapan-Roadmap-14-May2013.pdf&ei=WXEfUqajFpHCsAShtIDAAw&usg=AFQjCNEErR6TyIJ-xqlVsgQLJzAz3ejICw
SP: The mad scientists will kill us all.
Report comment
Dr. Goodheart
August 29, 2013 at 12:58 pm Log in to Reply
How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By
Fukushima? Via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/how-dangerous-is-400-6000-pounds-of.html
Report comment
PhilipUpNorth
August 29, 2013 at 2:39 pm Log in to Reply
A scientist estimates that FDNPP lost 40% of its load.
http://enenews.com/nuclear-engineer-276-quadrillion-becquerels-of-cesium-137estimated-to-have-seeped-into-water-that-fills-fukushimas-reactor-building-basements-triplechernobyls-total-release-some-has-alr
17. Using his figure, I calculated the full load for Reactors1-3 to be 690PBq of Cs-137. Since
Containments1-3 were breached, And since Corium1-3 may sit under the reactor buildings in
the ground, I suggest that it is accurate to say that there has been a 100% loss of the reactor
cores of Reactors1-3, putting emissions from the plant at 690PBq Cs-137.
Of course, this scientist gives no estimate for the amount of Plutonium and other nuclides that
blew up with Reactors1-3.
Nor, did the scientist guess at what burning spent fuel pools contributed to the emmissions.
Anyone care to attempt a calculation for total emissions of Fuku to date?
And, it ain't "over" yet, folks.
Biggest nuclear accident in history? Yoooooooou betcha!
Report comment
MoonlightEmpire
August 29, 2013 at 9:10 pm Log in to Reply
So far, every last microgram of fuel on the entire site (all reactors, sfps,
common sfp, dry cask, water storage, and all contaminated equipment) will
be liberated into the air, water, and soil. How many PBq would that be?
As of this moment–the year 2 P.F. (Post-Fukushima)–there is nothing stopping this.
There is no such thing as unemployment.
Report comment
Grampybone
December 15, 2013 at 6:02 pm Log in to Reply
The total release is whatever happens to 3 melted cores and all the
surrounding nuclear facilities. When the hydrogen builds up in the bottom of
containment is a matter of how long, not weather or not it happens. Then you ask, "will
the plant be clear of all other radioactive material of it explodes again?". If it has a
critical mass under containment due to concentration can it be controlled? The total
276 Quadrillion number relating to 1 isotope is just a sample of a isotope soup that
emits upwards of 25mSv at the plant. The instruments go wild frequently. They wont
give data on the entirety of a full core melt for isotopes they refuse to admit were in the
reactor in the first place. It's a MOX reactor with minimal containment. Disgusting fail
regulation.
Report comment
vicky13
August 29, 2013 at 2:53 pm Log in to Reply
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fukushima.asp
From Snopes
Report comment
truthseek
August 29, 2013 at 3:27 pm Log in to Reply
Epic FAIL for Snopes,
they are not valid.
Report comment
vicky13
August 29, 2013 at 4:28 pm Log in to Reply
yeah was surprised when I found that
Report comment
18. ChasAha
August 29, 2013 at 3:16 pm Log in to Reply
Fukushima will not be referred to as the biggest disaster in history until quadruple
meltdown(s) occur and continuously spew radioactive contamination into the
atmosphere and sea for more than 2 1/2 years.
Only then, maybe, will Fukushima be referred to as the largest catastrophic global event ever.
[sarc]
Report comment
ftlt
August 29, 2013 at 8:37 pm Log in to Reply
1111111# Much of this recent press reminds me of the typical distraction stories
whenever the Empire's forces are ready to strike…
It is always the same…one way or another..
This whole things just didn't happen …
Nothing is really different now than it was a almost years ago now…
This story will be pushed under the rug as soon as the war starts…
22222222### Also, if the radiation plume is surrounding Hawaii now as reported ..
Why are we not at the very getting independent reports about it ???…
Is the radiation in the plume not as bad as suggested on here or are the reports of it being
censored???
What gives with the lack of noise and outrage from Hawaii??
Report comment
Mack
August 30, 2013 at 6:28 am Log in to Reply
On March 13, 2011, FOIA documents already show Fukushima was worse than
Chernobyl.
See the Chart on page 3:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/110327882/Pages-From-C143372-02A-March-13th-2011-PMTComparison-of-Fukushima-Daiichi-to-TMI-and-Chernobyl-Accidents
Report comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
« Fukushima plant in national emergency says
governor — “Severe radioactive contamination with
serious health affects on local population” — ‘Global
intervention’ suggested
[hungryfeed url="http://exskf.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
link_target="_blank" max_items="5" feed_fields="title"
item_fields="title"]
[hungryfeed
url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Enformable?
format=xmlt" link_target="_blank" max_items="6"
feed_fields="title" item_fields="title"]
Bloomberg: Japan gov’t needs to understand crisis
at Fukushima is a matter of life and death — ABC
Interview: “They are slowly killing us… They know full
well it’s leaking, but they’ve done nothing” (AUDIO) »
[hungryfeed url="http://w w w .fairew inds.org/rss"
link_target="_blank" max_items="6" feed_fields="title"
item_fields="title"]
[hungryfeed url="http://enenew s.com/feed"
link_target="_blank" max_items="6" feed_fields="title"
item_fields="title"]
[hungryfeed url="http://fukushima-diary.com/feed"
link_target="_blank" max_items="7" feed_fields="title"
item_fields="title"]
Subscribe to the ENENew s RSS Feed
Connect w ith ENENew s:
Sign up for daily email updates
Like ENENew s on Facebook
Follow ENENew s on Tw itter
Contact | Terms | About | Log in | Register | RSS Feed
2014 ENENews llc - All Rights Reserved