Amazon faces major issues that threaten its leadership in e-commerce including increased competition, challenges with operational execution due to fast growth, and rising complexity. The document recommends optimization strategies across five areas: strategy, organizational structure, project management, leadership, and control systems. Specific proposals include increasing R&D spending to beat competition, implementing lean principles to minimize complexity, and applying customer surveys and advanced IT to improve operational execution. The comprehensive plan aims to resolve critical issues over 12-18 month timeframes requiring cross-functional collaboration.
2. About this Presentation
• Objective: Describe operations optimization strategies to maximize profits
and social value of global companies in today’s business arena.
• Methodology: This presentation was developed using the Leadership
Operational Plan tailor-made for Amazon, and it includes the following:
I. Company Overview
II. Company’ Major Issues Faced
III. Recommendations of the necessary changes to achieve optimization:
a) Strategy
b) Organizational Structure Behavior Practices
c) Operations Management
d) Project Management
e) Leadership Behaviors
f) Control Systems & Key Performance Indicators to measure the progress
2Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
4. Amazon Overview
• Who is Amazon?
It is the world’s largest online company, complex, global, ambitious and revolutionary
company. With headquarters in Seattle, Washington, Amazon trades in NASDAQ
(AMZN), NASDAQ-100 and S&P 5000 and employs approximately 230,800 full-time
and part-time employees. Amazon is both, a manufacturing organization producing
electronic goods; and a service organization distributing millions of products from
thousands of sellers (Amazon Annual Report, 2015).
• Vision
To be earth’s most customer-centric company; to build a place where people can
come to find and discover anything they might want to buy online.
• Mission
To leverage technology and the expertise of our valuable employees to provide our
customers with the best shopping experience on the Internet.
• Business Strategy
To get big fast by investing aggressively in new product categories and new business,
by spending money on brand awareness and getting new customers.
4Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
5. Amazon Overview (cont.)
• Leadership Team
Amazon Executive Officers and Directors team includes eight people which
average age is 51 years, seven out of eight, are American nationals and they
have been employed by Amazon for at least nine years (see Table 1).
5Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 1
Amazon’s Executive Officers and Directors
Name Age Hiring
Year
Current Position
Jeffrey Bezos 52 1996a
President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Chairman of the Board
Jeffrey Blackburn 46 2006 Senior Vice President Business
Development
Andrew Jassy 48 2006 Senior Vice President Amazon Web
Services
Brian Olsavsky 52 2002 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Diego Piacentini 55 2007 Senior Vice President International
Consumer Business
Shelley Reynolds 51 2007 Vice President, Worldwide Controller,
and Principal Accounting Officer
Jeffrey Wilke 49 2007 Senior Vice President Consumer Business
David Zapolsky 52 2002 Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
and Secretary
Note: Adapted from Amazon Annual Report (2015).
6. Amazon Overview (cont.)
• Amazon Sources of Competitive
Advantages
1. Technology
• Expertise in technology
• “One-Click” System
2. Economies of Scale
3. Talented workforce
• Company Culture
4. Marketing
• Brand name and reputation
5. Extensive product offerings
6. Extremely low prices
• Shipping/delivery advantages
• Manufacturing of Kindle as
lowest-price e-reader
6Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Figure 1
Amazon Web Services
Note: Grey squares refer to the specific Amazon’ masters servers
location (9 regions) and the white circles to the zones within each
server (25 zones). Source Amazon Annual Plan (2015).
7. Amazon Overview (cont.)
7Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Figure 2
Understanding Amazon Competitive
Advantages Dependencies
Proposed Counter-
Measurements (see
details in Section III)
8. Amazon Overview (cont.)
8Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Figure 3
Amazon’s Porter’s Five Forces Model
Note: Amazon’ business model success relies extensively on achieving the lowest
possible prices. Source Operational Plan for Amazon (2016).
9. Amazon Overview (cont.)
9Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
This table depicts Amazon’ Strengths
(S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities
(O), and Threats (T), and relates it to
its Competitive Advantages:.
This analysis is supported by
organization-specific, and peer-
reviewed references.
Table 3
Amazon Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (S.W.O.T)
Strengths Weaknesses
[S1] Operational Network
[S2] Customer-centric business
[S3] Differentiation of Business Model
[W1] Decline financial performance
[W2] Operational issues (deliveries and quality)
[W3] Bad reputation on social responsibility and
social value creation
[W4] High dependency on currency fluctuations
Opportunities Threats
[O1] Expansion capabilities to new markets (e.g.,
Africa, and the Middle East)
[O2] Strong scale economy to grow horizontally
(i.e., acquisitions, joint-ventures, merging)
[O3] Expansion capabilities on existing markets
(e.g., United States, Italy, United Kingdom,
Germany)
[O4] Profits and Net Income improvement by
products diversification (e.g., bank
services, payment services, etc.)
[T1] Foreign Exchange Risk
[T2] Competition (new and existing)
[T3] Dependency on one distribution channel, the
Internet
[T4] Government regulations and compliance
Note: S represents Strengths, W Weaknesses, O opportunities, and T means Threats. This analysis
is supported by organization-specific (Amazon Annual Report, 2015), and peer-reviewed
Table 2
Amazon’ Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis
(S.W.O.T.)
10. Amazon Overview (cont.)
10Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Amazon
S.W.O.T.Analysis
Leadership Scale CashFlow Innovation Knowledge Total
S1 Operational Network 3 3 2 3 3 14
S2 Customer-centric business 3 1 1 3 2 10
S3 Differentiation ofBusiness model 3 1 3 1 2 10
S4 Senior Leadership business acumen and experience 3 1 3 3 3 13
W1 Declinefinancial performance 3 2 1 1 2 9
W2 Operational issues (deliveries and quality) 3 3 1 2 3 12
W3 Bad reputation on social responsibility and social valuecreation 3 2 1 1 2 9
W4 High dependency on currency fluctuations 1 3 1 2 1 8
O1 Expansion capabilities to newmarkets (e.g.,Africa and MiddleEast) 3 3 2 2 1 11
O2 Strongscaleeconomy to growhorizontally (i.e.,acquisitions,joint-ventures,merging) 3 3 1 2 3 12
O3 Expansion capabilities on existingmarkets (e.g.,United states,Italy,United Kingdom,Germany) 3 3 3 3 3 15
O4 Profits and NetIncomeimprovementby products diversification (e.g.,bank services,paymentservices,etc.) 3 2 2 3 2 12
T1 Foreign ExchangeRisk 2 3 1 2 2 10
T2 Competition (newand existing) 3 3 2 3 2 13
T3 Dependency on onedistribution channel,Internet 3 1 1 3 2 10
T4 Governmentregulations and compliance 0
Total . 42 34 25 34 33 168
Friday,October21,2016
CriticalSuccessFactor(CSF)
Table 3
Amazon’s Competitive Scope vs. Competitive Advantage
Data interpretation: The highest score
the highest the correlation. Leadership
has the biggest influence to maximize
strengths, minimize weaknesses,
realize opportunities, and reduce the
risk of the threats are those depending
on leadership effectiveness.
Figure 4
S.W.O.T. vs. Industry Critical Success
Factors
Note: The higher the number, the stronger the dependency between Critical
Success Factor (CSF) and S.W.O.T. Source Operational Plan for Amazon
(2016).
11. II. Major Issues Faced
Amazon’ Challenges to Continue
Leading the E-Commerce Industry
Globally
12. • Amazon´s competitive advantage relies extensively on the intangible ability to delight customers
with uncompromised quality, timely delivery, and unparalleled purchasing experience.
Furthermore, Amazon’s success relies deeply on its ability to keep their customers satisfied.
• Customer satisfaction is measured by four key performance indicators (KPI), (1) on time delivery,
(2) quality/reliability, (3) total landed cost (price of the good or service delivered in desired
location), and (4) purchasing experience (easiness to satisfy customers need –variety of products
and services, description of features and functionality, pre and post-sale interaction, speed to
resolve any problem).
• These are the most severe issues Amazon needs to resolve:
1) Competition: Amazon competes in six industries (i.e., retail, e-commerce services,
digital content, electronic devices, and web and infrastructure computing services) each
of them fighting vigorously to increase their market share and value.
2) Operational Execution: because of the fast execution pace (growing total sales
between 20% and 25% year over year) and aggressive timing of Amazon´s expansion
plans –geographic regions, products, services, and technologies, (Amazon Annual
Report, 2015), operational system becomes vital to Amazon.
3) Complexity: Complexity to manage resources efficiently in an uncertain and dynamic
global business is rising significantly.
12Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Major Issues Faced by Amazon
13. Major Issues Faced by Amazon
Quantitative Analysis
13Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 2
Amazon´s Issues to continue growing and delivering positive results
Number Issue Severity
(S)
Occurrence
(O)
Awareness
(A)
Issue Relevance
(S x O x A)
1 Competition 3 3 3 27
2 Operational
Execution
3 3 3 27
3 Complexity 3 3 3 27
4 Financial Projection
Accuracy
2 3 3 18
5 Compliance 3 2 3 18
6 Employees Motivation 3 2 3 18
7 Commoditization 2 2 2 8
8 Leadership Turnover 3 2 3 18
9 Retain and expand
network of sellers
3 2 3 18
10 Adoption rates of
Internet usage
3 1 3 9
11 Mix of Products and
Services
1 2 3 6
12 Lack of innovation 3 1 3 9
This table depicts the list of issues faced by Amazon using a comprehensive analytical approach
and adds three quantitative factors to measure them, using problem severity (S) to Amazon´s
financial results, the probability of occurrence (O), and Amazon´s awareness (A) to prevent
issues’ effect.
Table 4
Note: Source Operational Plan for Amazon (2016).
14. Major Issues Faced by Amazon (cont.)
Quantitative Analysis
14Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 2 (cont.)
Amazon´s Issues to continue growing and delivering positive results
Number Issue Severity
(S)
Occurrence
(O)
Awareness
(A)
Issue Relevance
(S x O x A)
11 Mix of Products and
Services
1 2 3 6
12 Lack of innovation 3 1 3 9
13 Fuel and gasoline
price increase
affecting total landed
cost for the customers
2 3 3 18
14 Spyware, viruses,
phishing, and other
spam e-mails
3 3 2 18
15 Terrorist Attacks and
armed hostilities
3 2 2 12
Note: Each factor is measured in the three levels, 1=Low, 2=Medium, and 3=High. Evaluation is
supported on organization specific, industry, and peer-reviewed references paired with author’s
assessment. The importance of the issue comes from multiplying severity times occurrence times
awareness, and it is used to identify what the biggest issues are to propose strategies and actions to
resolve them.
Table 4 (cont.)
15. III. Recommendations
Optimizing Amazon´ operating system is
vital for its present and future as the
realization of industry growth relies on
resolving these issues efficiently
16. Pillars of Amazon´s Operations’
Improvement Plan
Amazon’s generic corporate strategy, concentric diversification, has allowed the
company (1) creating value to their customers by using their technology expertise;
this is Amazon’s main lever to create scale-economy and distribute the substantial
investment in IT solutions (fixed cost) competitively, and (2) achieving the highest
value to their customer base. However, for this results to continue, Amazon needs to
update their strategy to resolve the identified critical issues efficiently (competition,
complexity, and execution).
Considering the deepness and relevancy of the proposals, they involve the
participation of the company as a whole and touch five areas where further
improvement is required (see Tables 5, 6 and 7) :
a) Strategy
b) Organizational Structure Behavior Practices
c) Project Management
d) Leadership Behaviors
e) Control Systems & Key Performance Indicators to measure the progress
16Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
17. #1 Beat Competition
17Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 5
Amazon´s Operations Management Optimization Plan
Issue Proposed Solution Level of Strategic Change
and Function Responsible
for Execution 3
Estimated
Implementation Times
(Months)
Competition
1. Increase capital allocation
to R&D activities, raising
the 35% up to 40%.
2. Implement more advanced
technology solutions to
track its customers’
consumer patterns more
accurately.
3. Introduce a robust training
to their critical leadership
team to develop global
mindset,
4. Hire the services of
professional consultants in
global trading to penetrate
new markets with less
taxation and better fiscal
incentives.
1. Level 1, Amazon’ CEO and
Board decision and
execution.
2. Level 1, Amazon’ CEO and
Board decision and
execution.
3. Level 2, Amazon’ Chief
Operations Officer decision,
Divisional Operations
Directors and HHRR
Leaders execution.
4. Level 2, Amazon’ Chief
Operations Officer decision,
Divisional Operations
Directors and HHRR
Leaders execution.
1. Next Budget 2017-2018: 12
months.
2. Technology solution
identification: three
months; evaluation: three
months, implementation
six months (12 months
total)
3. Training material
selection: three months;
trainers certification; two
months; training and
assessment effectiveness:
seven months (12 months
total).
4. Consultants’ choice: one
month; financial strategy
definition: three months;
strategy execution: eight
months (12 months total).
Note: Source Operational Plan for Amazon (2016).
18. #2 Minimize Complexity
18Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 6
Amazon´s Operations Management Optimization Plan
Issue Proposed Solution Level of Strategic Change
and Function Responsible
for Execution 3
Estimated
Implementation Times
(Months)
Operational
Execution
1. Implement Lean Enterprise
Principles across all the
organization to eliminate
waste (e.g., motion,
transportation, inventory,
defects, reworks,
overproduction, and
space).
2. Implement an operational’
balanced scorecard focused
on monitoring actively
cycle time of core
processes (e.g., receiving,
shipment preparation,
labeling and packaging,
shipping, invoicing, etc.).
The focus is to minimize
cycle times of every step in
the process, and even
eliminate as many steps as
possible to make the
process flow continuous
and the inventory the
lowest.
1. Level 1, Amazon’ CEO
decision, execution relies on
the entire leadership team
(all functions included).
2. Level 2, Amazon’ Chief
Operations Officer decision,
execution depends on
Divisional Operations
Directors and Managers.
1. Next Budget 2017-2018:12
months.
2. Balanced Scorecard
definition and agreement
with all operational team:
six months; depletion of the
dashboard and monitoring
tool solution
implementation for real-
time tracking of KPI (Key
Performance Indicators): six
months, (12 months total).
Note: Source Operational Plan for Amazon (2016).
19. #3 Optimize Operational Execution
19Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Table 7
Amazon´s Operations Management Optimization Plan
Issue Proposed Solution Level of Strategic Change
and Function Responsible
for Execution 3
Estimated
Implementation Times
(Months)
Complexity
1. Apply Gartner’s survey to
Amazon’ customers to
identify the areas where
Amazon value proposition
is perceived complex.
2. Rethink Amazon’ global
footprint allowing simpler
segmentation by products
type. Consider reducing
the 35 departments to 20
(e.g., grouping clothing
with sports and outdoors).
3. Further enhance IT
(Information Technology)
solutions implementing
more advanced to make
sellers’ and customers’
transactions more efficient
(consider expanding Big
Data existing
infrastructure).
1. Level 2, Amazon’ Sales,
Business Development and
Marketing Director(s)’
decision, execution relies on
the entire customer service
department.
2. Level 2, Amazon’ Chief
Operations Officer decision,
execution depends on
Divisional Operations
Directors and Managers
(mostly those in the
fulfillment centers).
3. Level 2, Amazon’ Chief
Information Technology
Officer decision, execution
depends on Divisional IT
Directors and Managers.
1. Survey design and
customization: three
months; implementation
three months; results
analysis and action plans
definition: three months
(nine months total).
2. Global footprint analysis
accompanied with
quantitative and qualitative
assessment matrix: three
months; changes definition
and execution: 12 months,
(15 months total).
3. IT accompaniments
definition and assessment:
three months;
implementation in a pilot
operation: nine months;
and global deployment: 12
months (24 months).
Note: Source Operational Plan for Amazon (2016).
20. Organizational Structure and Leadership
Behavior Practices Improvement
Final Comments
• Amazon’s senior leaders should learn how to create a learning organization and
understand this is a core responsibility as company success will rely severely on creating
this solution to allow each employee to learn new processes, methods, use of information
technology tools, etc.
• Further, Amazon´s leaders should design an adapting organization that responds
efficiently (i.e., fast and coherently) to its market’ demands. Amazon is a global brand, with a
decentralized management who soon realized that growing from inside, developing their
own talent, financing with their own capital sources, and deploying one of the most
admirable innovative capacity, has created a successful and inspiring ecommerce
conglomerate.
• Amazon should seriously consider using the concept of transformational leadership, as
this should accelerate the “connection between the organization’s philosophy and shared
values, and embeds those values in organizational rules and actions in order to
communicate meaning and inspire followers” (Bennis & Nanus, 1985, p. 58). Amazon
should update its hiring profiles for senior positions to embrace a strict (non-negotiable) set
of leadership traits including critical reflective skills. Critical thinking should be a key
requirement to Amazon’ leaders, as it will improve their recognition abilities, getting to the
point, using their analytical skills to perform better evaluations of reality, eliminating biases
or at least, consciously reducing them, improving their alternatives searching, finding viable
approaches to improve their metrics, behaviors and the entire organization. Amazon can
leverage critical reflective skills to lead their employees in the process to improve ethical
20Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
21. Project Management and Key
Performance Indicators
Final Comments
• Amazon’ key performance indicators (i.e., sales growth and free cash-flow per share)
depend on a mix of variables, some of them are internally controlled (e.g., quality and
delivery execution, cost of goods sold, employee satisfaction, social value creation, etc.),
some are induced (political stability, inflation and exchange rates, converging or diverging
technologies affecting Amazon’ value proposition.).
• Most of these variables are measured by Amazon in in a weekly dashboard; however, it is
highly recommended for Amazon to evolve this rather reactive performance management to
implement Hoshin-Kanri (HK), a Japanese tool to deploy strategy efficiently. This
recommendation is supported on the possibility HK opens for companies immersed in (a)
global footprints, (b) conflicting and several priorities, (c) uncertainty and insufficient
information to make decisions, (d) high risk of making superficial analysis on core metrics
and projects because the lack of resources (time, people, talent, tools, etc.); to deploy their
strategy efficiently, i.e. getting the objectives, resources, timing, execution responsible
people, performance metrics –dependent (bottom-line metrics) and independent (preventive
metrics), etc. defined and implemented efficiently.
• Last, it is recommended Amazon certifies their Divisional Directors and project executers in
the Project Management Institute methodology (PMI), and agree to document all projects
using the Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) to prevent
failures on execution and value realization from these projects.
21Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
22. References
Amazon Annual Report (2015). Retrieve from http://www.amazon.com/
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: the strategies for taking charge. Los Angeles, CA:
Harper & Row
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R, (2002). Execution: The discipline of getting things done. New York, NY:
Crown Business.
Chakravarthy, B. (2007). A new strategy framework from coping with turbulence. New York, NY:
Sloan.
Coates, K. (2013). Social dumping does not work. Financial World, 4(2), 19-25.
Cooper, H. M. (2015). Organizing knowledge synthesis: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge
in Society, 1, 104-126.
Cook, J. (2016). Amazon.com dubbed a corporate scrooge by hometown newspaper. Retrieve from
http://www.geekwire.com/2016/amazoncom-dubbed-corporate-scrooge-hometown-newspaper/
Mason, R. (2007). The external environment’s effect on management and strategy. A complexity
theory approach. Management Decision, 45(1), 10-28.
22Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
23. References (cont.)
McKenzie, C., & James, K. (2004). Aesthetic as an aid to understanding complex systems and
decision judgment in operating complex systems. Emergence: Complexity & Organizations, 6(1-
2), 32-39.
OECD (2010). Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs through innovation. Paper presented at the
Conference for Ministers responsible for SMEs and Industry, Bologna, Italy.
Rahman, N. M. (2012). The effective implementation of global supply chain management in small to
medium-sized companies in Malaysia: an empirical study. International Journal of Management,
29(3), 274-287.
Rosales, V., Juárez, A., Millán, J., & Matovic, V. (2016). Business Models. Journal of Management,
1(3), 1-42.
Sheriff, K. (2016). An adaptive strategy for managing knowledge in organizations. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 10(4), 72-80.
23Ivan F Rodriguez | BUS721 University of Phoenix
Notes de l'éditeur
APA 6th Edition is used on this presentation for properly formatting of in-text citation and the references.
Amazon brings the opportunity to analyze one of the most startling companies of the present time and the challenge to propose viable solutions to improve further their incredible revenues and profits growth rate.
Amazon stands out among hundreds of companies (even in the same industry) not only for the apparent simplicity of its business model (commerce and merchandising through the Internet) but for reshaping consumers’ purchasing preferences and moving an entire industry into a new platform, e-commerce.
Amazon’s financial success depends severely on its ability to deliver quality products, at the lowest landed cost, and as rapidly as possible (Rosales, et al., 2016). Therefore, Amazon´s must monitor closely at minimum five strategic critical success factors (CSF), (1) effective global leadership, (2) scale economies, (3) positive cash flow, (4) innovation –supported in an efficient research and development (R&D) department to pair the speed of expected service efficiencies without reducing value to customer through customization, and (5) knowledge generation, sharing and application (Sheriff, 2016).
Amazon’ business model success relies extensively on achieving the lowest possible prices. And these are some of the tactical actions defined and executed by Amazon to realize this objective:
Amazon prime members
Customers can avoid state sales tax
Free shipping offers
Small companies and individual sellers
Selling Kindle at a deficit
Amazon’s Price Check App
The biggest correlations to maximize strengths, minimize weaknesses, realize opportunities, and reduce the risk of the threats are those depending on leadership effectiveness.
Rating is done using 1 for low, 2 for medium, and 3 for high correlation between Critical Success Factor and SWOT element. The higher the number, the stronger the association (i.e., dependency between critical success factor and SWOT is more robust).
There are several pressures to Amazon continued success, among the most relevant, (1) fierce competition. Amazon competes in six industries (i.e., retail, e-commerce services, digital content, electronic devices, and web and infrastructure computing services) each of them fighting vigorously to increase their market share and value. Companies in these industries are getting more diversified, specialized and competitive (Rosales et al., 2016), and they push strongly to combine businesses and develop global alliances to strengthen their barriers to entry, and reduce supplier and buyer power, barriers to exit and substitutes (i.e., retail stores, sales by catalog, and rental services). Internet is how Amazon approaches and interacts with its customers, offers low entry barrier levels whose coped with the speed companies are grouping to get better-positioned increase exponentially its competition. These five giants’ online retailers are Amazon’ biggest competitors: Overstock.com, Target.com, Walmart.com and eBay.com (companies from the United States), and Alibaba (from China) (Rosales et al., 2016). (2) Operational execution, because of the fast execution pace (growing total sales between 20% and 25% year over year) and aggressive timing of Amazon´s expansion plans –geographic regions, products, services, and technologies, (Amazon Annual Report, 2015), operational system becomes vital to Amazon. Furthermore, operational system is supported vastly on leadership skills and information technology solutions will be challenged mercilessly. (3) Complexity. Complexity to manage resources efficiently in an uncertain and dynamic global business is rising significantly. Amazon will need to continue adapting their organizational structure (in all functions and roles) to remain competitive and appealing to the market. This organizational upgrading implies upgrading their employees’ skills to cope with the complexity induced by a bigger, faster and more demanding market. (4) Ability to project accurately financial and operational results. Internal financial controls need simplification, agility, and precision to pair with the growing governmental regulations to report financial performance, exposures and liabilities (Rahman, 2012). (5) Compliance. Legal compliance including labor, financial, intellectual property, antitrust, anticorruption, and environmental regulations are getting severer (Rahman, 2012). Amazon operates in local, regional and international markets, and needs to update the legal frame (and leadership skills) to muddle through such law and regulations convolution without increasing its liability and cost. (6) Employees motivation. Amazon requires dependable teams, inspired, focused and efficient, able to learn fast and apply this knowledge to define new processes and methods that yield higher operational efficiencies. Incentive programs, career paths, compensation, long-term employment, etc. must be supported with proficient systems and tools that make employees’ job productive and pleasant. (7) Growing commoditization, Amazon´s ability to differentiate its products and services to compete efficiently in the six industries they do business with (described above), is difficult as most of them are commodities with lower life-cycles and changing rapidly, consequently, Amazon´s competitive advantage relies extensively on the intangible ability to delight customers with uncompromised quality, timely delivery, and unparalleled purchasing experience.
(1) Competition: Companies in these industries are getting more diversified, specialized and competitive (Rosales et al., 2016), and they push strongly to combine businesses and develop global alliances to strengthen their barriers to entry, and reduce supplier and buyer power, barriers to exit and substitutes (i.e., retail stores, sales by catalog, and rental services). Internet is how Amazon approaches and interacts with its customers, offers low entry barrier levels whose coped with the speed companies are grouping to get better-positioned increase exponentially its competition. These five giants’ online retailers are Amazon’ biggest competitors: Overstock.com, Target.com, Walmart.com and eBay.com (companies from the United States), and Alibaba (from China) (Rosales et al., 2016).
(2) Operational Execution: Furthermore, operational system is supported vastly on leadership skills and information technology solutions will be challenged mercilessly.
(3) Complexity:
Based on above results, the most critical issues based on its relevancy to Amazon´s financial performance are (1) Competition, (2) Operational Execution, and (3) Complexity. This presentation depicts the strategies to resolve efficiently these issues to prevent damaging Amazon’ reputation, reducing its speed of growth, or affecting its operating results negatively. Furthermore, aligning Amazon´s current operating system to growth rate expectations is crucial to ensure Amazon’s continued financial success.
Generic Extrinsic Root Cause1
Globalization is the primary source of increased competition. Globalization is the inner force of the capitalism system to maximize profits. Hence it depends on the means used to determine if its effect will be positive or not. The most direct symptom of globalization is the race to the bottom line that companies follow (i.e. profits, measured typically by Operating Profit Before Interest and Taxes (OPBIT), Earnings Before Interest Taxes (EBIT), Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), and Return on Investment (ROI)) doing everything to minimize costs (e.g., labor, materials, and overhead) and maximize profits.
Generic Intrinsic Root Cause2
Amazon has decided to compete in the Ecommerce industry which is characterized by the low entry barriers (Cook, 2016). In a competitive market, sales go to the competitor who offers the lowest price. Consequently, prices tend toward the level of the lowest cost producer, and when this tendency lowers the price of goods and services through the improved efficiency touted by the advocates of free-market forces, the effect is benign, but when corporations and governments lower the cost by reducing environmental protection, wages, salaries, health care, and education (Coates, 2013).
Note: 1 States the source creating the effect/issue outside of Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is affected by external factors out of its control. 2 Refers to the source creating the effect/issue within Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is contributing to the problem. 3 Denotes the level of Amazon´ strategy where the proposed solution is required, three levels are acknowledged, this highest, when strategy determines direction for the entire organization (e.g., vision, mission, values, principles, code of conduct, etc.), the next level discusses the business decisions required to improve company’ results (e.g., new products, new divisions, new markets, etc.); and the last level discusses the changes at operational level (e.g., equipment, process, method, tools, procedures, etc.).
Generic Extrinsic Root Cause1
Complexity is defined as the “measure of heterogeneity or diversity in internal and environmental factors such as departments, customers, suppliers, socio-politics and technology” (Mason, 2007, p. 45). Complexity derives from the augmented number of elements at a micro-level in a multifaceted system affecting “embryonic behavior and overall outcome at the macro-level” (McKenzie & James, 2004, p. 35).
Generic Intrinsic Root Cause2
Amazon’ complexity derives from its business mode –ecommerce 24x7 365 days per year (never stop servicing customers globally), size – more than $107 billion dollars, and the number of products and services offered to the market –more than 200 million (Amazon Annual Report, 2015). As the complexity of system upsurges, the capability to comprehend and utilize information to design and forecast the future becomes more challenging. Over time, the cumulative complexity leads to more change within the system (Chakravarthy, 2007). As the system becomes more complex, making sense of it becomes more challenging and adaptation to the changing setting becomes more difficult (Mason, 2007).
Note: 1 States the source creating the effect/issue outside of Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is affected by external factors out of its control. 2 Refers to the source creating the effect/issue within Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is contributing to the problem. 3 Denotes the level of Amazon´ strategy where the proposed solution is required, three levels are acknowledged, this highest, when strategy determines direction for the entire organization (e.g., vision, mission, values, principles, code of conduct, etc.), the next level discusses the business decisions required to improve company’ results (e.g., new products, new divisions, new markets, etc.); and the last level discusses the changes at operational level (e.g., equipment, process, method, tools, procedures, etc.).
Generic Extrinsic Root Cause1
According to Cooper, almost 90% of firms bankruptcies are related to leadership errors (2015). He classified the causes of failure in 12 types, (1) poor industry knowledge, (2) insufficient financing experience, (3) weak cash flow, (4) inadequate or insufficient business planning, (5) leadership ineptitude, (6) reduced competition knowledge, (7) impractical goals, and objectives, (8) weakening customer base, (9) inorganic growth, (10) unsuitable location, (11) weak management control, and (12) absence of entrepreneurial abilities –astonishing results because more than 51% of businesses’ proprietors have a college degree according to the data published by the OECD (2010).
Generic Intrinsic Root Cause2
Amazon’s aggressive growth plan is probably the most relevant internal factor affecting negatively its operational execution, leaving unhappy customers and creating financial exposures (lawsuits, excess inventory, etc.). Inorganic growth is affecting Amazon’ ability to remain effective in the new scale of activities. Incompetence by some operational leaders (e.g., stress on resources and time, arrogance, emotive pricing decisions, lack of experience of market dynamics, weak preparation, absence of financial know-how), instable management (e.g., growing too fast, incorrect borrowing policies –if any, insufficient credit granting practices), lack of leadership experience (e.g., short-term vision and commitment, lack of supply chain management practices), and last, leadership’ negligence, scam and calamity.
Note: 1 States the source creating the effect/issue outside of Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is affected by external factors out of its control. 2 Refers to the source creating the effect/issue within Amazon, in other words, how Amazon is contributing to the problem. 3 Denotes the level of Amazon´ strategy where the proposed solution is required, three levels are acknowledged, this highest, when strategy determines direction for the entire organization (e.g., vision, mission, values, principles, code of conduct, etc.), the next level discusses the business decisions required to improve company’ results (e.g., new products, new divisions, new markets, etc.); and the last level discusses the changes at operational level (e.g., equipment, process, method, tools, procedures, etc.).
From 2014 to date, Amazon has received an increased number of complaints about unethical practices (Cook, 2016). It seems imperative for Amazon to review their senior leaders’ compensation plans, and incentive programs to include the ethical responsibility dimension.
According to Bennis and Nanus (1985), critical reflective process can trigger transforming learning as it represent a viable and effective method for the leader to evolve from value-conservation to value-creation, and promoting critical thinking.
HK is a filter itself to ensure most common mistakes on project execution are prevented as HK appoints specific team members to own the process of defining, measuring, analyzing, implementing, and controlling the projects, an end-to-end process (Bossidy & Charan, 2002). HK is narrowed and specific, and Amazon could benefit from it to ensure the nearly 1,450 projects for 2016-2017 are prioritized, staffed, planned and executed timely and with the quality required to achieve sales and free cash-flow per share growth.
According to Bennis and Nanus (1985), critical reflective process can trigger transforming learning as it represent a viable and effective method for the leader to evolve from value-conservation to value-creation, and promoting critical thinking.