2. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 2
INLANDWATERWAYTRANSPORT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE FORTHETRANSPORT OF GOODS IN EUROPE.
MORETHAN 37,000 KILOMETRES OFWATERWAYS CONNECT HUNDREDS OF CITIES AND INDUSTRIAL REGIONS
Source:Eurostat.EuropeanFederationof Inland Ports,IVR
* -members of European Federation of Inland Ports
13 countries
>11,5 thndvessels
≈7% market share
of transport modes
approx. 200 main
river ports*
528 mln.t
of cargoes
in 2013
3. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 3
ROLE OF INLAND WATERWAYSTRANSPORT IN EU
Source: Baker Tilly, Eurostat
MODAL SPLIT OF INLAND FREIGHT TRANSPORT MODESINTHE EU, %
33%
27%
18%
13%
8%
5,5%
5%
4%
4%
3%
3%
1%
Netherlands
Romania
Belgium
Germany
Croatia
Hungary
Austria
France
Bulgaria
Luxembourg
Slovakia
Ukraine
75,4 75,5 77 75,7 75 74,5
6,3 6,3 6,1 6,9 6,3 6,9
18,3 18,2 16,9 17,4 18,7 18,6
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Rail IWT Road
SHARE OF IWT BY COUNTRIES IN EU, %
4. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 4
NETHERLANDS & BELGIUM HAVETHE HIGHEST DENSITY OF INLANDWATERWAYS IN EU
Source: Baker Tilly
Ukraine
4France
9,4
Poland
11,7
Italy
5,2
Finland
23,6
Germany
21,2
Romania
7,5
CZ
8,6
UK
4,3
Netherlands
147,0
HU17,1
LT
6,9
LV0,2
AT 4,2
Belgium
49,7
DENSITY OF EUROPEAN INLAND NAVIGABLE
WATERWAYS IN 2013,
KM/1000KM2
Netherlands 147,0
Belgium 49,7
Germany 21,2
Romania 7,5
Ukraine 4
Country Density
5. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 5
THE LARGESTVOLUME OFTRAFFIC IN EUROPE IS REGISTERED AS FLOWING FROMTHE NORTH SEA MARITIME PORTS BOUND
FOR GERMANY AND SWITZERLAND, LARGELY GENERATED ALONGTHE RHINE AXIS
Source:Eurostat,IVR
* - the same cargo volumes may be accounted by several countries(mostly transit)
Netherlands 356,1 48,6 5 851
Germany 226,9 60,1 2 454
Belgium 187,4 10,4 1 581
France 68,7 9,21 1 557
Romania 26 ,9 5,37 n/a
Country
Volume*,
mln.t
Vessels,
units
Turnover,
bln. tkm
6. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 6
RHINE ISTHE MAIN RIVER BY SHARE INTRANSPORTATION
Source:NEA,Eurostat
SHARE INTOTALTRANSPORT PERFORMANCE IN EU
Rhine
68%
North-
South
16%
East-West
2%
Danube
14% Metal ores
23,5%
Coke and refined
petroleum products
15,7%
Coaland crude
petroleum
12,3%
Products ofagriculture
11,7%
Chemicals, rubberand
plastic, nuclear fuel
10,2%
Basic metals;fabricated
metal products
5,4%
Secondary raw materials
and wastes
3,8%
Foodproducts,
beveragesandtobaco
3,8%
Other
13,5%
EU-28TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE
BY MAINTYPE OF GOODS IN 2013 - % IN TKM
East-West – Mittellandkanal-Elbe-Odra
North-South – Seine-Schelde
7. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 7
SOME RIVER PORTS PROVIDE RIVERSIDETRANSSHIPMENTS ONLY,WHILE SOME ARE UNIVERSAL
Source: Inland navigation in Europe -Market observation2014
INLAND PORTSTRANSSHIPMENTS IN EUROPEAN UNION
Duisburg
49,4
Liege-13,2
Cologne - 11,7
Paris
20,8
Mannheim - 8,7 Strasbourg–8,0
Neuss
7,6
Ludwigshafen am
Rhein - 7,6 Basel
6,8
Brussels- 6,6
EU PORTSWITH SEAPORT AND RIVERSIDE PORT
TRANSSHIPMENTS IN 2013, MLN.T
200
ROTTERDAM 94,3ANTWERP
33,5
AMSTERDAM
10,8
HAMBURG
- seaport traffic
- inlandnavigation traffic
440,5
190,8
139,0
95,7
TOP10 EU RIVER PORTSWITH RIVERSIDE PORT
TRANSSHIPMENTS –IN 2013, MLN.T
8. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 8
GENERAL CARGO VESSELS DOMINATE IN WESTERN-EUROPEAN FLEET STRUCTURE
Source: IVR (April 2013)
GeneralCargoVessel
Push Freight Barge
TankVessel
Total DWT: 7 284 thndt
Other
Total DWT: 551 thndt
Total DWT: 3 454 thndt
Total DWT: 4 068 thndt
6382
2696
1990
478
11,5TNHD
VESSELS
Western European fleet include
vessels from Netherlands,
Germany, Belgium, France,
Switzerland & Luxembourg
9. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 9
IWT ARE THE MOST COMPATIBLE ON DISTANCES OF 200-300 AND OVER 400 KM (RHINE CORRIDOR)
Source: PLATINA
SHARE PERTRANSPORT MODE BY DISTANCE CLASS (IN KM) ONTHE RHINE CORRIDOR
3,6% 6,5%
14%
24%
10%
20%
38%
53%
96% 93% 83%
72%
82%
70%
53%
34%
0,2% 0,7% 2,6% 4,1% 7,8% 10% 9% 13%
<50km 50-100 km 100-200 km 200-300 km 300-400 km 400-600 km 600-800 km >800km
Rail Road IWT
10. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 10
ADVANTAGES OF IWT OVER AUTOTRANSPORT
inthe case of high
volume traffic flows,
inland waterways
provide a means of
avoidingcongestion in
port conurbations, on the
corridors thatserve the
hinterland and also in
hinterland conurbations
inlandwaterway transport
has highfixed costs and low
variablecosts, so costs per
kilometre and perTEU
become lower thehigherthe
transport capacity and the
containercapacityutilization
ratio.Water transport is more
energyefficientandhaslower
costs per tonne-kilometre
than eitherroad or rail
it facilitates the
repositioning of large
numbers of empty
containers at low cost
it provides an alternative
modeto the road, whose
negative externalities are
becomingincreasingly
unacceptable, in
response to
environmental and
societal pressures
TRAFFIC
FLOWS
COSTS ALTERNATIVEREPOSITIONING
Source: Antoine Frémont, Pierre Franc et Brian Slack: «Inland barge services and container transport: the case
of the ports of Le Havre and Marseillein the European context»
11. MAY 2015
INLAND WATERWAYS IN EU 11
NECESSARY CONDITIONSFORTHEDEVELOPMENTOFINLANDWATERWAYTRANSPORT
Infrastructure
The existenceof an inlandwaterway network whichpermits servicesto the hinterland,
particularly the largest cities.The greater that network’s density andinterconnectivity
with other basins, the greater the possibilities of serving a large hinterland
EFFICIENT
INLAND
WATERWAY
TRANSPORT
Volumes and
distance
The greater the volumesat the seaport or the final destination, the more advantageous
it becomes to use inland waterway services. Inaddition, the more distant the markets
from the port the greater the opportunities to exploit waterway transport.
Reliability and
frequency
It is necessaryfor inlandwaterway servicesto be reliable and frequent and offer a
transit time which is acceptable in comparison with road and rail.There must be a
network of inland waterway terminalsor inland hubs, where traffic flows are
concentratedand broken up in order to be routed to their final destinations.
End-haulroad
transport
Terminal handling costs in the barge terminal should not be too great to threaten the
competitiveness of the combined waterway-road services in compared to allroad
transport.
Full chain
control
There is a need to provide the shipper with an integrated end-to-endservice between
the maritime terminal and the final destination. This requires actors that are able to
coordinate the inlandchain.
Source: Antoine Frémont, PierreFranc et Brian Slack: «Inland barge services and container transport: the case of the ports of Le Havre
and MarseilleintheEuropean context»(Konings,Notteboom,Panayides etal., Vander HorstetDeLangen)
12. MAY 2015
Thank You for Attention!
Andrii Shkliar Head of Advisory, Ph.D.
andrii.shkliar@cfts.org.ua
Office Kyiv, 01032
Vetrova st 11, off.39
tel.: +38 044 235 84 34
http://cfts-consulting.com/
Serhiy Vovk Director
serhiy.vovk@cfts.org.ua