論文閱讀報告-陳竹正

論文閱讀報告
指導教授: 李元德教授
學生: 陳竹正

主論文－What Theory is
Not, Theorizing Is

主論文－What Theory is Not,
Theorizing Is

Mapping(USPTO) Patent Data
using Overlays to Google Maps
 重點:
將“專利資料”統計重疊呈現於Google地圖之
上。
 心得:
 從WOS-SSCI下載的資料，通訊作者部份有包含國
家，可將其統計重疊呈現於Google地圖之上。
 可利用個人所指導的畢業專題-高效能高節能手機
定位系統之程式碼改寫。(畫面如後)
 關鍵在: 需要所有資料的座標，而下載下來的大量
資料只有國家或城市名。
 或利用老師提供文章中所提:SCI2 TOOL:
https://sci2.cns.iu.edu/user/index.php (畫面如後)

畢業專題-高效能高節能手機定位系
統-畫面圖1

老師提供文章中所提:SCI2
TOOL

THEORY BUILDING FROM
CASES: OPPORTUNITIES AND
CHALLENGES
 第一段最後一行為此文之重心:
…, we focus on the related research strategy
of theory building from cases, particularly
multiple cases.

THEORY BUILDING FROM
CASES: OPPORTUNITIES AND

CHALLENGES
Conclusion: 結論之重點
 Theory building from case studies is an increasingly popular
and relevant research strategy……
 Challenge: research relying on rich qualitative data is
becoming more common.
 Mitigate(減輕）through precise language and thoughtful
research design: (此部份為作者提出之方法)
 Careful justification of theory building
 Theoretical sampling of cases
 Interviews that limit informant bias
 Rich presentation of evidence in tables and appendixes
 Clear statement of theoretical arguments
 The result is fresh theory that bridges well from rich
qualitative evidence to mainstream deductive research.

BETTER STORIES AND BETTER
CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE FOR RIGOR(精
密的） AND COMPARATIVE LOGIC
 1991 stanford University

 第一段：

I focused on multiple cases and how to
develop theory from them, but I paid scant
attention to the important role of single-
case research. -> redressing that imbalance
 作者此文重視“single-case research”的重要

CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE FOR
RIGOR AND COMPARATIVE
此篇文章之整體架構 LOGIC
 第一段
 ARE SINGLE-CASE STUDIES SUPERIOR?
 ARE THE CLASSIC STUDIES LOOSE SINGLE
CASES?
 IS “BETTER STORIES VERSUS BETTER
CONSTRUCTS” A FALSE DICHOTOMY?
錯誤的二分法－＞呼應題目
 CONCLUSION

CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE FOR RIGOR AND
COMPARATIVE LOGIC
閱讀心得重點:
 … good story telling is an essential first

step, but good theory is fundamentally the
result of rigorous (精密的、正確的）
methodology and comparative, multiple-
case logic.
 This is as evident in the classic case studies

as it is in contemporary multiple-case
research.

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to
Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to
Eisenhardt
 1991 Brigham Young University

 1989 Eisenhardt presented an approach to

building theory using case studies, which
summarized a hybrid form of case
research……
相關資料：
http://www.getcited.org/pub/103368440
 Rejoinder:答辯,回答,應答; 還嘴,頂嘴

此篇文章應為上一篇之回應文。

Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to
Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to
Eisenhardt
 第一段第四行：第一段重點
For us this approach is paradoxical because
although its purported purpose is theory
generation, it includes many of the
attributes of hypothesis-testing research.
->如老師註解：testing != building /
creation
->rejoinder

Better Stories, Not Better
Constructs, to Generate Better
Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt
此篇文章整體架構
 第一段

 Case(s) Versus Case Study research

 Deep Case Studies Versus Surface Case

Studies
 Telling Good Stories Versus Creating Good

Constructs
 Summary Comments

Better Stories, Not Better
Constructs, to Generate Better
Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt
 Summary Comments (結論重點)
 …Our goal has not been to discourage such
efforts but rather to point out what researchers
miss if they overlook the advantages of the
classic case study.
 …we hope that many scholars will continue to
try to tell good stories that have theoretical
import.(兩者兼顧)

論文閱讀報告-陳竹正

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à 論文閱讀報告-陳竹正

Similaire à 論文閱讀報告-陳竹正 (20)

論文閱讀報告-陳竹正