6. Improve social cohesion
and well-being
Improve effectiveness
and sustainability of
policy
and activities by ‘third
parties
Improve quality of life
and cultural wealth
Enlarge economic
prosperity
and robustness
Continuity of funding
Trust of citizens
Touchstone
Relevance
Personal skills
Fulfillment
7.
8. 8
SO WHAT?
Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact
HOW?
Problem
Impact may be big or small, instrumental (direct change) or
conceptual (ideas, feelings), quantitative or qualitative.
There is no single type of impact.
Understanding terminology
Identify what is process (pathway to) and what is
effect/result (impact)
12. In tune with contemporary research practices
Internal + external communication
Different voice
Extra channel
Creating a community (online/offline)
Develop in-house expertise
13.
14. 14
“Highly tweeted articles were
11 times more likely to be
highly cited.” (Eysenbach
2011)
“Papers mentioned on Twitter
are more downloaded and
cited than papers which are
not.” (Shuai 2011)
“Twitter activity was a more
important predictor of citation
than 5-year journal impact
factor.” (Peoples 2016)
“Twitter activity was not driven
by journal impact factor, the
‘highest-impact’ journals were
not necessarily the most
discussed online.” (Peoples
2016)
“Factors driving social media
and citations are different.
Social media metrics cannot
be seen as alternative to
citations.” (Haustein 2015)
“Among social media metrics,
citations correlate the most
with Twitter, although tweets
are not a good predictor of
citation impact.” (Haustein
2015)
17. 17
There must be an ID
Not about body of work or
general expertise
Different traditions in different
disciplines
Dependent on Altmetric
inclusion/tracking
22. @ResearchUGent
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!
Slides available via SlideShare
Esther De Smet
Research Department
May 2019
Notes de l'éditeur
Fontmeme Alice (fancy fonts)
But also take it that one step further – beyond the academic environment
Let in outside influences into your science and acknowledge that there is also valuable knowledge outside the walls of your institute
Look for ways in which you can develop socially robust knowledge and allow for cocreation of science.
Helga Nowotny , Peter Scott and Michael T. Gibbons - Re-Thinking Science: Mode 2 in Societal Context (2003)
“Science’s validity no longer determined solely, or predominantly, by narrowly circumscribed scientific communities
but by much wider communities of engagement comprising knowledge producers, disseminators, traders and users.”