SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  15
THE [REGION IV ASPA] MIDDLE AMERICA STATE LITTER SCORECARD :   Winners, Losers and In-betweens, In Assessing Statewide Environmental Quality    Through Public Property Litter Removal Performances     Steve Spacek, M.P.A .   The Region IV American Society for Public Administration Conference   Western  Michigan University, Grand Rapids   November 7, 2008
Welcome to Michigan! Nationally Ranks “ Below Average ” in Statewide Public Property Litter Eradication
The Region IV ASPA “Middle America” States : Colorado; Illinois; Iowa; Kansas; Michigan; Minnesota; Missouri; Nebraska; New Mexico;  North Dakota; Oklahoma; South Dakota; Texas; Wisconsin
Maintaining a Clean Environment :  Litter Eradication/Abatement is a source reduction  physical activity that provides a healthy, enjoyable  surface environment for humans and wildlife.  Littering  :Throwing of small amounts of trash/garbage in small, individualized portions.  Dumping   is littering on a larger, voluminous scale.  Both are  environmental crimes  creating dangers to public health, safety and welfare.
Environmental Injustice:   Litter/Source Reduction Activities Amongst MIDDLE AMERICA States are  UNEQUAL ,  UNJUST!! ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],* 2005 Traffic Facts , NHTSA. **Bullard; Cochran, A., ***Ockles.
HUMANS Cause Littering:   Factors Crafting An Unique Environmental Injustice  Upon MIDDLE AMERICA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MIDDLE AMERICA Litter Source Reduction Activities ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The MIDDLE AMERICA State Litter Scorecard ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Objective ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Subjective ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Methodology ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
SCORECARD SUMMARY: Region IV ASPA Middle America, Nearby and Selected States                                                               Objective                 Subjective             Designation              Remarks                                                                                                                                                                    New Mexico                 4 6                          40                    WORST                      1, 3, 4                 Oklahoma                   39                          39         BELOW AVERAGE        2, 3                    Texas                             38                          38        BELOW  AVERAGE          2, 3                  Michigan                       35                          28            BELOW  AVERAGE        4, 9, c, d             Illinois                          29                          32          BELOW AVERAGE        2, 6                Missouri                       27                          25                  AVERAGE North Dakota               26                          22                  AVERAGE                  1, 4, f         Colorado                       28                          16          ABOVE AVERAGE          1, 2, d , e Wisconsin                     21                          19        ABOVE AVERAGE          4, 9, d South Dakota               14                          21          ABOVE AVERAGE            9 Kansas                            12                          17          ABOVE AVERAGE          f Nebraska                       15                             8          ABOVE AVERAGE  a, e Iowa                               11                            2                      BEST  a, c, d, e Minnesota                     4                            1                    BEST  a, b, d, e IN  30  26  BELOW AVERAGE OH                               25                          27                 AVERAGE NY                     19                        24         ABOVE AVERAGE MD  8  13  ABOVE AVERAGE TN                   41                           43                   WORST NC              40                          41                   WORST FL                         33                         35         BELOW AVERAGE CA                    31                         36         BELOW AVERAGE WY                      5                           12                      BEST                  NV                           49                          44                  WORST MS  50  50  WORST VT                        1                         4                    BEST  Remarks: 1-High Litter Fatal Crash Deaths 2-Low Per Capita Environmental Spending  3-Poor Statewide Livability    4-High Per Capita Waste Disposal 5-Unconducive Political Administrative Culture  6- High Public Servant Corruption 7-Poor Statewide Government Performance 8-Poor Highway Performance  9-No Statewide Anti-litter Slogan                 a-Great Statewide Livability b-Low Per Capita Waste Disposal c-Beverage Container Deposits                 d-Conducive Political Administrative Culture  e-Low/No Public Servant Corruption f-Great Highway Performance                                                                                            Copyright 2008, Steve L. Spacek
 
Case Study: Minnesota vs. North Dakota vs. Michigan vs. New Mexico ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Conclusion/Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Contenu connexe

En vedette

NEMO Science Museum
NEMO Science MuseumNEMO Science Museum
NEMO Science Museumxeniagratch
 
Pre colonial science and technology in the third world
Pre colonial science and technology in the third worldPre colonial science and technology in the third world
Pre colonial science and technology in the third worldAngenica Martirez
 
Virtual trip to Science City Kolkata
Virtual trip to Science City KolkataVirtual trip to Science City Kolkata
Virtual trip to Science City KolkataAmogha Prakash
 
Regional Science Center , Bhopal
Regional Science Center , BhopalRegional Science Center , Bhopal
Regional Science Center , BhopalRahul Bajaj
 
Thesis presentation 2013
Thesis presentation 2013Thesis presentation 2013
Thesis presentation 2013ROHIT SINGLA
 
Net study of Glasgow Science Centre
Net study of Glasgow Science CentreNet study of Glasgow Science Centre
Net study of Glasgow Science CentreManoj Kumar
 
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.Manoj Kumar
 

En vedette (12)

Iowa Science City Scorecard
Iowa Science City ScorecardIowa Science City Scorecard
Iowa Science City Scorecard
 
NEMO Science Museum
NEMO Science MuseumNEMO Science Museum
NEMO Science Museum
 
Pre colonial science and technology in the third world
Pre colonial science and technology in the third worldPre colonial science and technology in the third world
Pre colonial science and technology in the third world
 
Science museum
Science museumScience museum
Science museum
 
The Science of the City - Introduction
The Science of the City - IntroductionThe Science of the City - Introduction
The Science of the City - Introduction
 
Virtual trip to Science City Kolkata
Virtual trip to Science City KolkataVirtual trip to Science City Kolkata
Virtual trip to Science City Kolkata
 
Regional Science Center , Bhopal
Regional Science Center , BhopalRegional Science Center , Bhopal
Regional Science Center , Bhopal
 
Kolkata science city
Kolkata science cityKolkata science city
Kolkata science city
 
Museum Case Studies
Museum Case StudiesMuseum Case Studies
Museum Case Studies
 
Thesis presentation 2013
Thesis presentation 2013Thesis presentation 2013
Thesis presentation 2013
 
Net study of Glasgow Science Centre
Net study of Glasgow Science CentreNet study of Glasgow Science Centre
Net study of Glasgow Science Centre
 
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.
Case study of Pushpa Gujral Science City.
 

Similaire à Middle America Litter Scorecard (2008)

United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae BriefUnited States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae BriefCarson J. Tucker, MSEL, JD
 
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as PartneTABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partnelisandrai1k
 
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docx
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docxSubmission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docx
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docxdavid4611
 
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...Georgia State School of Public Health
 
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...TWCA
 
2042 Population Growth Forecast
2042 Population Growth Forecast2042 Population Growth Forecast
2042 Population Growth Forecastmartinej11
 

Similaire à Middle America Litter Scorecard (2008) (14)

(First) American State Litter Scorecard (2008)
(First) American State Litter Scorecard (2008)(First) American State Litter Scorecard (2008)
(First) American State Litter Scorecard (2008)
 
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 NECoPA (U.S.) Northeastern States (and KEY CITI...
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 NECoPA (U.S.) Northeastern States (and KEY CITI...CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 NECoPA (U.S.) Northeastern States (and KEY CITI...
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 NECoPA (U.S.) Northeastern States (and KEY CITI...
 
ARE Southern States and Cities "Cleaner?" The SECoPA Southern State Litter Sc...
ARE Southern States and Cities "Cleaner?" The SECoPA Southern State Litter Sc...ARE Southern States and Cities "Cleaner?" The SECoPA Southern State Litter Sc...
ARE Southern States and Cities "Cleaner?" The SECoPA Southern State Litter Sc...
 
DO MESS WITH IT: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and Role Of Southern and...
DO MESS WITH IT: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and Role Of Southern and...DO MESS WITH IT: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and Role Of Southern and...
DO MESS WITH IT: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and Role Of Southern and...
 
NECOPA Northeast States Litter Scorecard (2011)
NECOPA Northeast States Litter Scorecard (2011)NECOPA Northeast States Litter Scorecard (2011)
NECOPA Northeast States Litter Scorecard (2011)
 
The 2014 Midwest American State Litter Scorecard
The 2014 Midwest American State Litter Scorecard The 2014 Midwest American State Litter Scorecard
The 2014 Midwest American State Litter Scorecard
 
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae BriefUnited States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
United States Supreme Court Amicus Curiae Brief
 
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 SECOPA US Southern States Litter Scorecard
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 SECOPA US Southern States Litter ScorecardCONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 SECOPA US Southern States Litter Scorecard
CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: 2019 SECOPA US Southern States Litter Scorecard
 
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as PartneTABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
 
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docx
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docxSubmission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docx
Submission Ide 1cef470f-3234-4b5e-8fd5-ebbce014745e29 SI.docx
 
The 2014 American State Litter Scorecard:USA's Cleanest & Dirtiest States (Am...
The 2014 American State Litter Scorecard:USA's Cleanest & Dirtiest States (Am...The 2014 American State Litter Scorecard:USA's Cleanest & Dirtiest States (Am...
The 2014 American State Litter Scorecard:USA's Cleanest & Dirtiest States (Am...
 
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...
Dr. David Dyjack - Executive Director of the National Environmental Health As...
 
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...
TWCA Annual Convention: Economic Impacts and Implications of Waterborne Litte...
 
2042 Population Growth Forecast
2042 Population Growth Forecast2042 Population Growth Forecast
2042 Population Growth Forecast
 

Plus de American State Litter Scorecard/Spacek Pub. Service Consulting

Plus de American State Litter Scorecard/Spacek Pub. Service Consulting (11)

BEST (Cleanest) & WORST (Dirtiest) U.S.States 2008 2011 2014
BEST (Cleanest) & WORST (Dirtiest) U.S.States 2008 2011 2014BEST (Cleanest) & WORST (Dirtiest) U.S.States 2008 2011 2014
BEST (Cleanest) & WORST (Dirtiest) U.S.States 2008 2011 2014
 
WHO Is Littering? By US State--Those Most Prone to Littering
WHO Is Littering? By US State--Those Most Prone to LitteringWHO Is Littering? By US State--Those Most Prone to Littering
WHO Is Littering? By US State--Those Most Prone to Littering
 
Northeastern United States Public Servant Corruption: Public Servant Venality...
Northeastern United States Public Servant Corruption: Public Servant Venality...Northeastern United States Public Servant Corruption: Public Servant Venality...
Northeastern United States Public Servant Corruption: Public Servant Venality...
 
Hear STEVE SPACEK "The Good..The Bad...The DIRTY!" (5/3/2018)
Hear STEVE SPACEK "The Good..The Bad...The DIRTY!" (5/3/2018)Hear STEVE SPACEK "The Good..The Bad...The DIRTY!" (5/3/2018)
Hear STEVE SPACEK "The Good..The Bad...The DIRTY!" (5/3/2018)
 
Earth Day 2018 | WHERE‘S 10 BIGGEST, Most Littered U.S. States?
Earth Day 2018 | WHERE‘S 10 BIGGEST, Most Littered U.S. States?Earth Day 2018 | WHERE‘S 10 BIGGEST, Most Littered U.S. States?
Earth Day 2018 | WHERE‘S 10 BIGGEST, Most Littered U.S. States?
 
Hear STEVE SPACEK Am. State Litter Scorecard "Bright Day With Tekneshia: INTE...
Hear STEVE SPACEK Am. State Litter Scorecard "Bright Day With Tekneshia: INTE...Hear STEVE SPACEK Am. State Litter Scorecard "Bright Day With Tekneshia: INTE...
Hear STEVE SPACEK Am. State Litter Scorecard "Bright Day With Tekneshia: INTE...
 
The 2011 American State Litter Scorecard--Cleanest & Dirtiest, w/Data, Scores...
The 2011 American State Litter Scorecard--Cleanest & Dirtiest, w/Data, Scores...The 2011 American State Litter Scorecard--Cleanest & Dirtiest, w/Data, Scores...
The 2011 American State Litter Scorecard--Cleanest & Dirtiest, w/Data, Scores...
 
America's DIRTIEST States (2014) [Americana Basura Estado]
America's DIRTIEST States (2014) [Americana Basura Estado]America's DIRTIEST States (2014) [Americana Basura Estado]
America's DIRTIEST States (2014) [Americana Basura Estado]
 
Top Deadly, Dangerous States: USA Debris/Litter Caused Crash Deaths 2014
Top Deadly, Dangerous States: USA Debris/Litter Caused Crash Deaths 2014Top Deadly, Dangerous States: USA Debris/Litter Caused Crash Deaths 2014
Top Deadly, Dangerous States: USA Debris/Litter Caused Crash Deaths 2014
 
America's Most WASTEFUL States
America's Most WASTEFUL StatesAmerica's Most WASTEFUL States
America's Most WASTEFUL States
 
NYC New York City Litter Garbage Scene -Now #1 "America's Dirtiest City" by T+L
NYC New York City Litter Garbage Scene -Now #1 "America's Dirtiest City" by T+LNYC New York City Litter Garbage Scene -Now #1 "America's Dirtiest City" by T+L
NYC New York City Litter Garbage Scene -Now #1 "America's Dirtiest City" by T+L
 

Middle America Litter Scorecard (2008)

  • 1. THE [REGION IV ASPA] MIDDLE AMERICA STATE LITTER SCORECARD : Winners, Losers and In-betweens, In Assessing Statewide Environmental Quality Through Public Property Litter Removal Performances Steve Spacek, M.P.A . The Region IV American Society for Public Administration Conference Western Michigan University, Grand Rapids November 7, 2008
  • 2. Welcome to Michigan! Nationally Ranks “ Below Average ” in Statewide Public Property Litter Eradication
  • 3. The Region IV ASPA “Middle America” States : Colorado; Illinois; Iowa; Kansas; Michigan; Minnesota; Missouri; Nebraska; New Mexico; North Dakota; Oklahoma; South Dakota; Texas; Wisconsin
  • 4. Maintaining a Clean Environment : Litter Eradication/Abatement is a source reduction physical activity that provides a healthy, enjoyable surface environment for humans and wildlife. Littering :Throwing of small amounts of trash/garbage in small, individualized portions. Dumping is littering on a larger, voluminous scale. Both are environmental crimes creating dangers to public health, safety and welfare.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. SCORECARD SUMMARY: Region IV ASPA Middle America, Nearby and Selected States                                                             Objective                Subjective           Designation           Remarks                                                                                                                                                                    New Mexico               4 6                        40                  WORST                    1, 3, 4                Oklahoma                 39                         39      BELOW AVERAGE      2, 3                    Texas                          38                        38      BELOW  AVERAGE        2, 3                  Michigan                    35                        28         BELOW  AVERAGE       4, 9, c, d            Illinois                        29                         32        BELOW AVERAGE       2, 6                Missouri                    27                         25                AVERAGE North Dakota            26                        22                AVERAGE                 1, 4, f        Colorado                    28                        16         ABOVE AVERAGE         1, 2, d , e Wisconsin                  21                         19      ABOVE AVERAGE         4, 9, d South Dakota            14                        21        ABOVE AVERAGE          9 Kansas                         12                        17        ABOVE AVERAGE         f Nebraska                    15                           8        ABOVE AVERAGE a, e Iowa                            11                          2                    BEST a, c, d, e Minnesota                  4                          1                  BEST a, b, d, e IN 30 26 BELOW AVERAGE OH                             25                         27                AVERAGE NY                   19                      24        ABOVE AVERAGE MD 8 13 ABOVE AVERAGE TN                  41                         43                  WORST NC             40                         41                  WORST FL                       33                        35        BELOW AVERAGE CA                   31                        36        BELOW AVERAGE WY                     5                          12                   BEST                  NV                         49                         44                WORST MS 50 50 WORST VT                      1                        4                  BEST Remarks: 1-High Litter Fatal Crash Deaths 2-Low Per Capita Environmental Spending 3-Poor Statewide Livability   4-High Per Capita Waste Disposal 5-Unconducive Political Administrative Culture 6- High Public Servant Corruption 7-Poor Statewide Government Performance 8-Poor Highway Performance 9-No Statewide Anti-litter Slogan                 a-Great Statewide Livability b-Low Per Capita Waste Disposal c-Beverage Container Deposits                 d-Conducive Political Administrative Culture e-Low/No Public Servant Corruption f-Great Highway Performance                                                                                            Copyright 2008, Steve L. Spacek
  • 13.  
  • 14.
  • 15.