Aok ethics

•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•

0 j'aime•1,213 vues

T

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What should I do?

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

A madman asks you where he can find the person he’s trying to kill and you know where they are hiding. What should you do? According to Kant you have a duty to tell the truth, and not lie regardless of the murderous consequences that are likely to happen. This seems clearly counter intuitive.

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Moral philosophy

Moral philosophy

Moral philosophy

Sumi Surendran S

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

James David Saul

Ethics vs morals

Ethics vs morals

Ethics vs morals

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

Introduction

George Matthews

04 moral relavitism_b

04 moral relavitism_b

04 moral relavitism_b

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter 2

Moral relativism and social capital

Moral relativism and social capital

Moral relativism and social capital

Michael Umphrey

Chapter 2

04 moral relativism

04 moral relativism

04 moral relativism

Ethical subjectivism

Ethical subjectivism

Ethical subjectivism

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Sourav Kumar Rao

Introduction to Ethics

Introduction to Ethics

Introduction to Ethics

Deontological ethics 3.2

Deontological ethics 3.2

Deontological ethics 3.2

Albert Gonzalo Bautista

Tendances (16)

Moral philosophy

Moral philosophy

Moral philosophy

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

Lecture 1: Philosphical Ethics (Feister) Slides

Ethics vs morals

Ethics vs morals

Ethics vs morals

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

Introduction

04 moral relavitism_b

04 moral relavitism_b

04 moral relavitism_b

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter3: Moral Objectivism

Chapter 2

Moral relativism and social capital

Moral relativism and social capital

Moral relativism and social capital

Chapter 2

04 moral relativism

04 moral relativism

04 moral relativism

Ethical subjectivism

Ethical subjectivism

Ethical subjectivism

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Philosophy 100: Chapt 10

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Ethical subjectivism & relativism

Introduction to Ethics

Introduction to Ethics

Introduction to Ethics

Deontological ethics 3.2

Deontological ethics 3.2

Deontological ethics 3.2

En vedette

Personal and shared knowledge

Personal and shared knowledge

Personal and shared knowledge

Fotos Oostduinkerke

Fotos Oostduinkerke

Fotos Oostduinkerke

Katrien De Schepper

許可式行銷與魚塘理論

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

The Agriculture Media Summit (#AgMS) is the largest gathering of crop and livestock publications professionals in the U.S. The annual event is hosted by the American Agricultural Editors' Association (AAEA), the Livestock Publications Council (LPC) and the ABM AGri Council. The mission of the Ag Media Summit is to provide professional development and education opportunities for its members, as well as to promote, support and enhance the viability of ag media as an efective communications medium I was asked to present at the 2011 #AgMS, held in New Orleans, LA on the topic of Integrating Digital Media Into Your Business and Measuring ROI. This presentation was intended to show #AgMS attendees how they could focus on bringing added value to their clients and prospective clients using digital channels, and then measure the impact of their efforts.

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Ditre Italia divani

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Danielle Carlock

Gap

Camilla Grandgeorge

My different Careers

My different Careers

My different Careers

Presentation Case Comunicação

Presentation Case Comunicação

Presentation Case Comunicação

Case Comunicação

animations

animations

Power point

Ring Tail Lemur

Ring Tail Lemur

Ring Tail Lemur

The Lower School

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

Ingria. Technopark St. Petersburg

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

Best shoping.

Leann And Tana

EC Profile

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

En vedette (20)

Personal and shared knowledge

Personal and shared knowledge

Personal and shared knowledge

Fotos Oostduinkerke

Fotos Oostduinkerke

Fotos Oostduinkerke

許可式行銷與魚塘理論

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

80 talister, kom-inn 101206

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Integrating Digital Marketing Into Your Business Strategy: 2011 Agriculture M...

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Catalogo divani Ditre Italia 2011

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11

Gap

My different Careers

My different Careers

My different Careers

Presentation Case Comunicação

Presentation Case Comunicação

Presentation Case Comunicação

animations

animations

Power point

Ring Tail Lemur

Ring Tail Lemur

Ring Tail Lemur

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

Никита Цуканов рассказал, как нужно учиться на чужих ошибках

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

AWS users group presentation optimizing your AWS account with CloudMGR & Clou...

Best shoping.

Leann And Tana

EC Profile

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

Artikel I Maintain Juni 2011

Similaire à Aok ethics

Aok ethics (1)

Assignments on Ethics

Assignments on Ethics

Assignments on Ethics

9.5 Moral Theories All moral claims are grounded in some moral theory. It is the nature of such claims that they are based on a system of beliefs about what is right and wrong, just and unjust. The table below lists a handful of the moral theories you are most likely to encounter in ethical arguments today. It’s important to note that each one has its own strengths and weaknesses. Moral theories give you general guidelines, but you still usually have to apply moral reasoning in individual cases to test them out. For example, none of these theories explicitly claim that killing is wrong. The theories are more about how you would ground your claim that killing is wrong. Moral theories are also not mutually exclusive. The argument that killing is wrong could be grounded in all of these theories. Whether they know it or not, everyone has a moral theory. It is inescapable. Even if their moral theory is that there are no morals, that still represents a moral theory. But not all moral theories are equal—some hold up to critical thinking better than others. You may see wisdom in all of these perspectives, or you may strongly identify with a single one. Regardless, it's important for you to recognize the potential weaknesses in any moral theory you favor, and it's helpful for you to understand why others find legitimacy in the moral theories they employ. Theory Criticisms Kantian Ethics · Immanuel Kant put forth the categorical imperative, which states that you should only act on moral principles that you would be willing to turn into universal laws mandating that everyone act the same way. · This is a version of the question, “How would you like it if everyone did that?” Any two people who want to get married should be able to. · This theory is so absolute that it sometimes goes against moral common sense. It’s wrong to kiss my spouse because I would not like it if everyone kissed my spouse. Utilitarianism · The morally right course of action is the one that will produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. · The only thing that matters is the consequences of the action, not the intentions behind the action (the ends justify the means). · Ignores people’s rights, duties, and intentions. · Could be used to justify an act that most would consider morally wrong because it inflicts harm on one person unjustly, even if it brings great happiness to many others. It’s okay to steal money from my neighbor and take my family on a vacation, because then my whole family would be happy, and only my neighbor would be harmed. Ethical Egoism · Doing whatever is best for your own interests or would make you happy. · This is not necessarily the same thing as doing whatever you want in the moment, because that might not be in your best interests in the long term. · Can be used to justify terrible actions. Ethical Altruism · Doing whatever is best for others or would bring the greatest amount of happiness to people besides yourself. · Some.

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

Ethical Theory Paper Elijah Kim What is the meaning of being a human? What is the meaning of being a good person? What is good? And why do we have to be good? The word ethic carries many implications and foundations. In Christianity, God creates this universe, earth, and man/woman in "his" image. However, the Human is not God and made many ethical mistakes that ask God for forgiveness. "Therefore you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you are who judge, for in whatever you judge another you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things." (Romans 2:1). No human being is innocent in front of God and not allow to judge each other. The ethical theory sets the foundation for a "right human being" and has numerous ways to break down. Ethical theory "is the systematic effort to understand moral concepts and justify moral principles and theories" (Fieser 2017), which means the study of Right Action. This "Right Action" can be divide into three different divisions. Metaethics can be defined as a God's view. For many religious believers and religious cultures, the Metaethics can be easily found. However, people who do not believe in a higher power or bird view have a problem with divine command metaethics (Morriston 2009). In the Metaethics view, moral obligations are taught and fixed by religious belief. For the non-religious believers there Metaethics can be set by the Karma they heard of or the own belief system. Just because of believing in religious belief and Karma, Metaethics do not take the basics from realism or antirealism. Instead, it contains the focused theories (Davis 2021). Moral Realism in Metaethics asses the meaning of the moral. Moral realism is the position of right and wrong in a variety of situations. Religions like Christianity made committed to moral realism for three different reasons. First, "constructivists tend to attribute moral facts to agents as their origin" (Jung 2015). In Christianity bible has the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20. These Ten Commandments are the fundamental moral value of Christian belief and set the standard. Commandments like "Thou shalt not commit adultery" and "Thou shalt not kill" are the well-known rule as a "basic human being." Like the last sentence, the bible has a clear example of do's and don'ts, right/ wrong. The bible also advised what evil (bad) can affect the person "Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners" (1 Corinthians 15:33). Many religious people believe in God's purpose. An example of Christianity, Genesis advised, Human were made to glorify God and his creation. Adam and Eve were also created to manage God's creation. "So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God" (1 Corinthians 10:31). "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28). The explicit purpose gave men and women a clear vision of life and motivated them to stay in God's ...

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

BetseyCalderon89

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about Morality? Chapter 8 Can We Reason about Morality? Copyright by Paul Herrick, 2020. For class use only. Not for distribution. This chapter: 34 pages of reading. 1. Come, Let Us Reason Together Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., once observed that if a man-made law conflicts with morality, it is unjust and should be repealed because morality, not man-made law, is our highest standard of behavior. Similarly, if a businessman could increase his profits by putting false labels on his products, he should not do so, even if he can get away with it, because it would be immoral. Morality takes precedence over deceptive business practices—no matter how profitable they might be. Morality also takes precedence over unexamined self-interest. A criminal may want to snatch a purse from an old lady walking with a cane, and perhaps he needs the money and could get away with it; however, he should not do so because it would be morally wrong.[endnoteRef:1] Surely these are eminently reasonable observations. [1: Martin Luther King Jr., “Letter from the Birmingham City Jail,” reprinted in James M. Washington, ed. A Testament of Hope. Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King Jr. (New York: Harper One, 1986), 289-302.] These thoughts remind us that morality is the ultimate criterion of good and bad, right and wrong, that we ought to live by, all things considered. Morality is ultimate in the sense that the obligations it imposes on us take precedence over all nonmoral considerations, including laws passed by legislatures, the profit and loss calculations of businesses, social customs, instincts, and the irrational impulses of ego, desire, prejudice, unexamined self-interest, and cognitive bias. One reason to agree with Dr. King, that morality is our highest standard, is that any human law, social custom, institution, business practice, desire, action—even traits acquired through the evolutionary process--can be evaluated and judged on a moral basis, using our faculty of critical thinking. The principles or “laws” of morality have a number of important properties. First, they are prescriptive rather than descriptive. That is to say, they prescribe how we ought to act, they do not describe how we do in fact act. Put another way, moral principles are not empirical generalizations about the way people actually behave, and they are not statements about the way people have behaved in the past or will behave in the future. Rather, they are norms or standards that we ought to follow, whether or not we do in fact follow them and whether or not we want to follow them. If someday it should come about that most people hate each other, that descriptive fact would not make it moral to hate. Hatred would still be morally wrong. If someday it should happen that every government in the world practices genocide, that descriptive fact would not make genocide morally right—genocide would still be morally wrong. For (again) morality is.

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possibility of rational discussion in ethics. Using the readings in our text and my Weekly Comments, show how these doctrines might be challenged. Feminist Care Ethics might be seen as a challenge to Kantian Ethics. Explain with reference to the readings in our text and my Weekly Comments. Feminist Care Ethics might be seen as a form of Virtue Ethics with the major difference being a disagreement about the nature of human excellence and the virtues necessary for acting ethically. Explain with reference to the readings in our text and my Weekly Comments. Explain the Trolley problem and the differences in the ways that utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, and Virtue Ethics would address the problem. Base your answer on the readings in our text and my Weekly Comments. Both Utilitarianism and Kant's deontological ethics sometimes lead to morally horrendous actions related to the sanctity of human life. Kantian ethics is able to avoid the morally horrendous actions that can be justified using Utilitarianism, while Utilitarianism can avoid the morally horrendous actions that accord with Kantian ethics. Virtue ethics, though, would not have the same sorts of problems addressing issues discussed in the text, such as torturing terrorists if it were necessary to save lives, the Trolley Problem, killing an innocent person to save the lives of others, lying or making a false promise to save the lives of others. Explain with reference to the readings in our text and my Weekly Comments, using specific examples of the types of cases that would provide problems for each of the theories. Week 2: Ethical Relativism Ethical Relativism is the claim that moral views are relative to the culture in which one lives or to the individual (also called Subjectivism). Many people declare themselves to be ethical relativists, but very few actually believe it to be true in practice. Often people are simply trying to avoid getting into an argument when they say that their ethical positions are just opinions. If it was true that you should avoid arguments about ethical issues, you would have to believe that there are good moral or possibly prudential reasons for not getting into arguments with others, that it was good for everyone to avoid conflict about controversial issues, which means that it is simply correct to be tolerant, making you opposed to relativism. Since you would be claiming that tolerance is a virtue that everyone should accept. In other cases, you may be concerned with ethnocentrism, the practice of imposing your views on others. But then, you would have to believe that being ethnocentric is morally wrong and that there are good moral reasons for not being ethnocentric. All of the people in the class took tolerance to be a moral virtue, some claiming that it is a result of cultural relativism. But you can’t derive a universal value from cultural relativism. And Daesh (ISIL, ISIS) and the Taliban .

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Introduction to ethics

Introduction to ethics

Introduction to ethics

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Ethical Argument Paper

Ethical Argument Paper

Ethical Argument Paper

Pay To Write Paper Greenwood

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Truth & Euthanasia When in Rome, Do as Romans Do What is Relativism? Relativism grounds the truth of something in the individual. So that, when we want to know whether or not something is right or wrong, who has the final say so? The individual. One of the major goals of relativism is that it seeks to take away harsh judgment and replace it with tolerance and peace. Some Positive Aspects About Relativism Living in America, our culture is a melting pot. Relativism reminds us that we should not take our standards as being obvious for others. Relativism can raise the question of whether or not we believe something because it's actually true, or just because we are comfortable with it. Another example could be that we should not think of ourselves as morally (or in any other way) superior because of our technological advances. The temptation may be that we look down on primitive tribes as being simple and uneducated. However their convictions and beliefs run as deep as ours. There are many kinds of relativism. Ultimately, the main tenants of relativism are that: 1 There are no objective truths. 2 Objective truths are those truths which are true even if no one wants to believe it. 3 Relativism says that because all truths are determined by themselves, their cultures, language, etc. that objective truths are actually an illusion. 4 Even truths such as 2+2=4 isn't necessarily truth, other than the fact that we have all agreed historically that it is true. • Because of this, "Man is the measure of all things". No one person's ethics is better than another's. But with this we have to mean that my ethics is no better than someone who lived 1500 years ago in another country. One is no better than the other, just different. A Buddhists' ethics are equal in merit to an American atheist. • Culture is responsible for the way we see and experience the world, including our morality. Thus, we never really see things as they really are, we always place our interpretation on reality. No absolute standard for how we should act can be given because we are not in a position to know (because knowledge of universal truths is impossible) which system is "better." There is no "better" - only different. • As we will see, many ethical systems refer to some sort of absolute "yardstick" to ground the correctness of their view. As we have seen, relativism rejects any yardstick altogether. In relativism, we are not burdened with trying to defend any sort of ethical system. Instead we look at a common practice within a society. • However, we should not conclude that just because there are no moral absolutes, that therefore we should never make moral judgements. For order and stability in our lives, we need rules, and we life is best when we work together. This is why, for example, it is okay in one culture to cut off the hand of ...

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

JohnPaulBuencuchillo2

Philosophy of moral

Philosophy of moral

Philosophy of moral

Darul Arqam boarding islamic school

PHI ethics2200C

PHI ethics2200C

PHI ethics2200C

Similaire à Aok ethics (14)

Aok ethics (1)

Assignments on Ethics

Assignments on Ethics

Assignments on Ethics

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docx

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

Ethical Theory PaperElijah KimWhat is the meaning of being a h

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Chapter 9. Can We Reason about MoralityChapter 8Can We Re.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possib.docx

Introduction to ethics

Introduction to ethics

Introduction to ethics

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

ethics ppt.pptx

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Week 1 Ethics Defined.pdf

Ethical Argument Paper

Ethical Argument Paper

Ethical Argument Paper

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

Relativism and Medical Ethics Exploring the Nature of Trut.docx

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

COMPARE; VIRTUE ETHICS AND UTILITARIANISM.pdf

Philosophy of moral

Philosophy of moral

Philosophy of moral

PHI ethics2200C

PHI ethics2200C

PHI ethics2200C

Plus de t0nywilliams

Meta ethics-1

Emotivism[1]

Determinism pp

The case for_materialism

The case for_materialism

The case for_materialism

Dualism 1

Natural law

Virtue ethics

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law.

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

2. utilitarianism explored

2. utilitarianism explored

2. utilitarianism explored

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism (good)

Utilitarianism (good)

Utilitarianism (good)

Kant

Brain snatched

Doing philosophy

Doing philosophy

Doing philosophy

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Egoism

Ethical egoism

Plus de t0nywilliams (20)

Meta ethics-1

Emotivism[1]

Determinism pp

The case for_materialism

The case for_materialism

The case for_materialism

Dualism 1

Natural law

Virtue ethics

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Virtue ethicsoverview and_re-visit

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law _situation_and_virtue_ethics (2)

Natural law.

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

Good recap and rule utilitarianism

2. utilitarianism explored

2. utilitarianism explored

2. utilitarianism explored

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism bentham mill

Utilitarianism (good)

Utilitarianism (good)

Utilitarianism (good)

Kant

Brain snatched

Doing philosophy

Doing philosophy

Doing philosophy

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Introduction to philosophy[1]

Egoism

Ethical egoism

Aok ethics

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6. What should I do?

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39. A madman asks you where he can find the person he’s trying to kill and you know where they are hiding. What should you do? According to Kant you have a duty to tell the truth, and not lie regardless of the murderous consequences that are likely to happen. This seems clearly counter intuitive.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.