Prezentacja testowa

Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator – MBTI  Kathy Prem Engineering Career Services University of Wisconsin-Madison MBTI, Myers-Briggs, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Introduction to Type are registered trademarks of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Trust

Introduction to Type Theory ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Innate Preferences ,[object Object],[object Object]

Development of the MBTI  Instrument ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Value of the MBTI  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Structure of the MBTI  ,[object Object],[object Object]

Four MBTI  Dichotomies How do you deal with the outer world? Judging – Perceiving J - P Dichotomy How do you make decisions? Thinking – Feeling T - F Dichotomy How do you prefer to take in information? Sensing – Intuition S - N Dichotomy Where do you prefer to focus your attention – and get your energy? Extr a version – Introversion E - I Dichotomy

Caution: MBTI  Word Usage ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

E – I Dichotomy: Source of Energy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Which is worse: no interruptions or frequent interruptions?

What is your E – I preference? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

S – N Dichotomy: Take in Information ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Which is worse – no sense of the present reality or no sense of the future possibilities?

What is your S-N preference? ,[object Object],[object Object]

T – F Dichotomy: Decision Making ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Which is worse: working in an environment that lacks logic or an environment that lacks harmony?

What is your T-F Preference? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

J – P Dichotomy: Lifestyle ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Which is worse: “winging it” or adhering to a schedule?

What is your J-P Preference? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What IS your Type  ? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Composite Type  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Why should we care? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Why should we care? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Communication Breakdown ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: From Teambuilding Program (2 nd Edition) , E. Hirsh, K. W. Hirsh, S. Krebs Hirsh, 2003, CPP, Inc.

Understanding Type  in “uncomfortable” situations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

To Take to the Office with You ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: From Teambuilding Program (2 nd Edition) , E. Hirsh, K. W. Hirsh, S. Krebs Hirsh, 2003, CPP, Inc.

Occupational Trends by Type  Source: From Introduction to Type and Careers , A.L. Hammer, 1993, Consulting Psychologists Press ISTJ Management Administration Law enforcement Accounting ISFJ Education Health care Religious settings INFJ Religion Counseling Teaching Arts INTJ Scientific or technical fields Computers Law ISTP Skilled trades Technical fields Agriculture Law Enforcement Military ISFP Health care Business Law enforcement INFP Counseling Writing Arts INTP Scientific or technical fields ESTP Marketing Skilled trades Business Law enforcement Applied technology ESFP Health care Teaching Coaching Childcare worker Skilled trades ENFP Counseling Teaching Religion Arts ENTP Science Management Technology Arts ESTJ Management Administration Law enforcement ESFJ Education Health care Religion ENFJ Religion Arts Teaching ENTJ Management Leadership

Determining Your Type  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Influences on Self-Reporting ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Influences on Self-Reporting ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Thereby, US societal values may cause over-reporting of the Type  …. Also true for workplace values

Want to complete the MBTI  ? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Responding to MBTI  Questions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Prezentacja testowa

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

En vedette

En vedette (20)

Similaire à Prezentacja testowa

Similaire à Prezentacja testowa (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Prezentacja testowa