SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  5
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
1. Present your strategy on how to decrease the delivery time and how to increase the realization
rate on Outgoing GIP in AIESEC Romania for the following term.

                       Driving success in
                       our sub programs
       Continuity                                                                                           Project based
                                                                                           Delivery         working system
                              Driving                  Product Based                       optimizatio
                              growth

    Growing each LC
                                                                                       Branding &Market       Improving
    as GIP EP Center
                                                                                       positioning            EP Servicing




 Driving growth in Global Internship Program: Achieving a massive sustainable growth in GIP by driving success in our sub-
 products or better said Global Programs (IT, Marketing, Education).
   1. Driving success in our sub programs by giving our targets (students, companies, members etc) the „WHY”, meaning
        why do we actually do GIPo, measuring the impact it has on our targets and reacting to their feedback in order to fully
        measure our success as an organization. Here I also include our members that need to receive strong preparation in
        order to work for GIP outgoing.
   2. Continuity: Due to the changes that the International Internships area had (from OGX to II, from MT,TT,ET,DT to GIP,
        GCDP, now on sub programs) created confusion not only through members but also through our targets. I would prefer
        to make sure the sub programs are implemented at the full potential and increase their visibility and relevance.
   3. Growing each LC as a GIP Center focused both on internal and external recruitment:
          3.1 internal recruitment through the development of integrated experiences to ensure qualitative transformation
               and organizational goal achievement (conversion of TMP/TLP to GIP )
          3.2 external recruitment through supply and demand analyze tool and macro EP profile provided by the MC
 Delivery optimization: improve and invent operation processes, systems and tools in order to maximize the delivery of
 experiences.
   1. Project based working system: as an ex participant and also a coordinator of a non formal education project I see the
        working system very relevant for our sub programs implementation. Therefore, I encourage the Grow structure of
        implementation ( meaning not all LCs have to do Grow but the ones who do it have the framework and timeline in
        order to be national aligned and have a concrete tracking an evaluation).
           I see myself as an MC VP working with my LC VPs team and my NST team. Also, my NST team (as project managers
        for the sub programs) will be working with the Team Leaders from the LCs in order to make them more responsible and
        aware of the AIESEC network. The local team working on the sub program and even the MC should have a synergy
        between II, COMM and TD members.
   2. Branding and Market positioning: as I mentioned above, I want to focus on continuity and increase the awareness of
        the sub programs based on a clear market positioning, credibility and a long lasting brand. Since some sub programs
        were already implemented for the first round, what I think it is necessary now is a brand evolution towards stronger
        market positioning. Also, since we strive to implement national sub programs, a national event on each program (GIP
        or GCDP) could be : The Internships Fair. Imagine it like a “Global Village” but presenting specific internships in specific
        countries. It’s a really big opportunity to attract or involve partners (NGOs, companies, MC partners from abroad) and
        it could be organized for both GIP and GCDP programs at the suitable peak for each of them. Signing partnerships with
        top performing countries on Corporate Incoming. (eg. For beeing one of the best IT countries, AI has Romania the
        number one priority for IT EPs, the partnership we have with AIESEC in Norway for IT Internships). I believe this will
        help us have a „targeted matching market”.
   3. Improving EP Servicing :



MC VP GIP Outgoing Application                                                           MCC 10-13th January 2013
Tania Șerbănoiu                                              Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
3.1 Having an EP selection process involving alumni or partners with selection experience either to prepare the
          members who do it or participate themselves at the interviews.
          3.2 Every EP should have an EP Buddy, cultural preparation, GIP preparation and AIESEC preparation.
          3.3 Having a tool such as CRM but on GIP Outgoing:
                     Internal: tracking on each term, on each recruitment on faculties the number of students applying for
                     internships, passing the interviews, raised, having interviews and getting matched
                     External: tracking the countries, LCs maybe even the pools with the status on matching messages, the
                     number of interviews had with our EPs, the positive/negative answers, matched and realized

2. What should be the evolution of each sub program on Outgoing GIP? What are the concrete
steps you are going to take in order to reach the performance stated?
                                   Main sub programs: Global IT, Global Education, Global Marketing
                                              Pilot: Global Engineering, Global Business

        For the main subprograms it will be much easier to describe the evolution as they were already created and
implemented in the LCs. An evaluation should be made in order to assure an improvement on them or compare each LC
market to see if a certain subprogram is relevant or sustainable for it and do the replanning. As the evaluation wasn’t done yet
because some of them didn’t finish the implementation I will present my way of seeing their evolution.

   Projects       Main suppliers        Operations        Q3              Q4              Q1             Q2

   Global IT     Finland, Sweden,    Promo&sales
                    Norway, the      Raising
                   Netherlands,      Matching
                    India, Brazil,   Realization
                   Canada, USA
  Global Edu      Central Eastern    Promo&sales
                      Europe         Raising
                                     Matching
                                     Realization
  Global Mk            ASIA          Promo&sales
                                     Raising
                                     Matching
                                     Realization
  Global Eng     Western Europe      Promo&sales
                                     Raising
                                     Matching
                                     Realization

1.Global IT
    • Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the IT sector
    • Market needs: Companies need IT students with project management and team skills, IT students are future
         entrepreneurs in the IT market and they need leadership and management skills, a high number of companies that
         want Romanian IT students
    • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in IT global environment, working in cutting edge between technology,
         entrepreneurship and business management skills
    • Target: Students and recent graduates with backgrounds like Web development and management, Database
         management, Software development & Programming, System analysis & design, Graphics Design, Industry / civil
         engineering
    • Objectives: Clear positioning of the subprogram on the market, Support LCs to implement, track and evaluate their
         own strategy on the subprogram making sure the message is in accordance with the MC directions, LC VPs receive the
         needed preparation in order for them to prepare the people that are going to work for the subprogram
    • Key Activities:
         A.Supply and demand management (Focus on main suppliers for Romania)
         B.Ongoing recruitment , depending also on each LC’s planning and capacity to implement (Nov - Dec/ Jan - Feb /
         March - May/ Aug - Sept)
         C.Preparation program for EPs (AIESEC/ICPS/Leadership and Management/Soft Skills)
         D.Matching and Realizing


MC VP GIP Outgoing Application                                                             MCC 10-13th January 2013
Tania Șerbănoiu                                                Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
E.Reintegration and possible Re Raising
    •    National support: assure the alignment regarding the message, the period the events are taking place (eg. The
         Internship Fair I mentioned in the strategy at point1 ), the materials (posters, flyers, AFs, selection materials, matching
         tools), tracking with the help of the NST, through SONA and Skype/Functional Meetings with the LC VPs, R&R (the LCs
         that reached their planning with receive a recognition)
         For the other Global sub programs I propose the same strategy as Global IT with some little differences:
2. Global Education:
     •    Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the educational sector
     • Market needs: Few vacancy jobs for students matching the subprogram’s profile, lack of opportunities to develop
         experience, a high number of TNs on myaiesec.net platform and also a new trend in AI
     • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in education, professional experience in a global environment, in sub-areas such
         as child learning, student learning and adult learning, improving English and teaching skills
     • Target: Young Teachers, students and recent graduates with knowledge in: Teaching English, Cultural Interaction,
         Development of personality and character, Consultancy Education and Career
3. Global Marketing:
     • Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the marketing sector
     • Market needs: Companies need students capable to design new and attractive marketing strategies, multinational
         companies ask for experience in international marketing and trade, high number of graduates from faculties with the
         background required for the EP profile, students don’t have the opportunities to get relevant experience for a job in
         this field
     • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in marketing, professional experience in a global environment, working in
         different markets (developed countries, emerging countries etc),entrepreneurship and business management skills
     • Target: Students and recent graduates, Marketing ,Advertising and PR International Relations, International
         Marketing, Market research, Communication Economics , other if the student worked in the marketing field (Import &
         Export, Consumer & Buyer Behaviour, product planning & control etc)
     From the Pilot Subprograms I would recommed Global Engineering to be implemented because of the high market needs,
rather than Global Business, when at this point, the TNs on the platform and the trends observed require in the majority of the
cases marketing, management, education or selling experience. TNs that don’t require any other experience are usually in
China or India and are based on hotel management. It is a quite high risk for students to compare or associate us with
Work&Travel Program that has many jobs in the hotel industry. Also, the fields from Global Business could be included in
Global Mk so there isn’t the need (at least for the moment) to have another sub program created.

3. How will you manage the marketing strategy of AIESEC Romania on Outgoing GIP taking into
consideration the national sub programs.
         In my opinion, marketing is a strategy to connect and develop a meaningful relationship with a prospective client.
         Firstly, we need to orient our organization to the external environment more than ever,
because responding to the needs of our local environment will stimulate our progress.
         Speaking from a true marketing point of view, when we try to sell GIPo (to EPs or TNs) we should take into
consideration 4 aspects: the product, the price, the place and the promotion.
For the potential EPs, we have to give them the WHY, why do we do GIPo and why should they take this opportunity. I believe
that the answer stays exactly in the context we all know and promote about AIESEC: helping youth to develop personally and
professionally. GIPo represents the point that reaches professional development. It offers you the concrete environment to see
what you are capable of and how can you manage yourself in a corporate environment.
         Even I, as a young person of the Romanian society, can say that a main requirement from the employment market is
the experience required. Companies appreciate any attempt to work. As students or recent graduaters, students don’t have
too many possibilities in order to fulfil this requirement. Here is where AIESEC makes its presence felt. Accessing the GIPo
program youth can develop personally but especially professionally.
          The added value of a student that took an internship through GIP program from other can be: the experience
accumulated, the international working environment, the way of seeing and doing things after having to deal with them
already, having the ability and the adaptability to work with people you’ve never worked before and so on. Having well
prepared employees help the company to increase its performance and sustainability. This kind of experience could easily be
associated with subprograms like Global IT, Global Engineering, Global Business or Global Marketing. A trend available on
myaiesec.net, especially in the Nordic part of Europe demands EPs with IT background. This represents a huge opportunity and
also an advantage for Romania, as we are known as one of the best IT providers with very qualitative EPs.



MC VP GIP Outgoing Application                                                           MCC 10-13th January 2013
Tania Șerbănoiu                                              Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
Also, through the Global Education subprogram, a certain improvement could be felt regarding the education system in
Romania and could decrease the unemplyment rate of the teachers. Here I can give a true example. One of the EPs matched
by AIESEC Pitesti, graduated and couldn’t find a job in Romania. She chose to take 2 GIP opportunities (ETs) and after coming
back, she had an impact on the education side by bringing and implementing new ways of teaching and also founded her own
English School.
           Talking about the pricing system on GIPo, I can’t considerate that there will be an alignment of the LCs in Romania
regarding the price of the internship fee, because each LC knows its market report. In my opinion, the priority should be the
visibility they have on the market with the internships, because having a low visibility and an increase of the products won’t
help the GIP Growth.
 Instead, a price alignment is possible but on the discount side (eg. A percentage discount for self matching, second or third
internship experience, alumni, members etc.)
           Now that visibility was brought into the discussion, it is important that our promotion to reach the target market, the
people we are trying to reach. We are capable to be innovative and promote our subprograms in ways that suits both us and
our target.Here, I can give an example that I also mentioned above: promoting our GIPo Internships through a national aligned
event, an Internship Fair. Speaking with some people from AIESEC Timisoara and AIESEC Iasi, learning a bit from their
experiences, I came up with the idea of this fair because we could have the students or recent graduates look for us and we
could also have a well known brand. Also, we could bring a representative from the TN Companies as CEEDer for example, to
increase the credibility on the market.
           It is our role to make youth understand that the international internships program is a life changing experience and
position ourselves so we can become the first choice for students for their self development.

4. Analyze the performance on Outgoing GIP in the last 3 years in AIESEC Romania. How will you
ensure a constant growth in quality and quantity in GIP on the following term?

The following statistics are from myaiesec.net     GIPo Process      2009-2010      2010-2011      2011-2012      1.07.2012-Now
accordingly also with AIESEC Romania’s                Raised            439            322            404               172
pipeline.Romania in the last 3 years:                Matched            137            173            137               68
                                                     Realized           141            169            144               63

                                                                                     Based on the statistics on our left:
                             AIESEC Ro GIPo                                              - For the raising process in 2010 we
                              2009-present                                           had a decrease of 27%, in 2011 an increase of
                                                                                     25,46% and until now we almost reached
    600                                                                              57,43% from the last term.
    400                                                                                  - For the matching process in 2010 we
    200                                                                              had an increase of 26,28%, in 2011 a decrease
                                                                                     of 20,81% and reached 50,37% from the last
      0                                                                              term.
              2009-2010        2010-2011          2011-2012    1.07.2012-Present         - For the realizing proces in 2010 we
                                                                                     had an increase of 19,86%, in 2011 a decrease
                            Raised     Matched      Realized                         of 14,8% and reached 56,25% from the last
                                                                                     term
     Also, we seem to have a high number of Raised, but a low number of Realized.
     For the GIPo Growth (in quality and quantity) and also for the increasing of the realization rate we need be aware of our
product and make sure that the initiatives are implemented at a full potential in each LC.
     In order to make that sure, 3 steps must be followed: implementation, tracking and evaluating.
I consider AIESEC Romania lucky, because on 2012-2013 term we already have the subprograms and the Business Models, we
just have to make sure they are well implemented. And by „well” I mean
          1. Clear positioning (as I mentioned above, at question 1, targeted recruitments, national aligned events,
assessments, partnerships)
          2. Healthy HR processes (first of all, a good planning, quarterly evalued and give feedback on it, involving alumni,
partners with selection experience, goal setting for every EP, having an EP Buddy and a tracking system for the EPs)
          3.LC Education (providing education materials and trainings for LC VPs and their members, making people want to
work for the internship programs (personal discussions, stories, combine the personal with professional part), maintaining the
international internships culture, encouraging networking –LC to LC, LC to NST)
          A good case practice from this term is having the NST team as project managers on the subprograms. For example,
each NST member is responsible for a Global initiative and has meeting with TLs from the LC to keep tracking on them, gives

MC VP GIP Outgoing Application                                                           MCC 10-13th January 2013
Tania Șerbănoiu                                              Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
support on the initiative, is in charge to maintain the „partnership management” if there is one on the initiative he is
responsible for.
        I would consider motivating and competitive if a R&R system is implemented for each subprogram.
Good case practices from countries that had the biggest growth on GIPo:
Poland:
    o They used market segmentation and product package and develop new programs such as: Business Program,
        Technical Top Talent, HIV/AIDs.
    o The Recruitments is very flexible, at minumun 3 months.
    o National Projects: Discover Program and Teach the World
    o National Partnership on National projects: Discover Russia, Discover China etc.
Brazil:
    o First country to implement the sub programs concept or recruiting
    o Maintaining the X+L strategy, having campaigns like „Match the Leaders of AIESEC Brazil”
    o Structure: Different strategies for GIP/GCDP
    o VPs from other CY in NSTs

     5. Present the main bottlenecks that kept AIESEC Romania from achieving the objectives planned
on Outgoing GIP. What will be the key strategies for each of them, that you are going to implement
in order to achieve the objectives planned?


                  Bottlenecks                                                      Solutions

 •   TN Managers that don’t reply and          •    CRM system implemented (as I mentioned above), Diversify promo methods
     EPs give up                                    (eg. this term we had an online promo that was called „BEST EPs” and an EP
                                                    searchtool „AIESEC Romania-probably the best EPs in the world), MC VPs
                                                    should create a strong connection with the other MC VPs and have my NST
                                                    team as project managers
 •   Few members working for GIPo              •    Attracting the members to work for GIPo, promoting the „Exchange Culture”,
     (it can be seen in SONA)                       sometimes the International Internships area turned out to be the most united
                                                    team (in work and fun), showing concrete benefits and stories, make the
                                                    members feel they can be a part of something bigger than themselves,
                                                    providing life changing experiences. Using the NST as project managers and
                                                    having them to keep tracking on their initiative, having regular Skype meetings
                                                    with TLs from the LCs
 •   Lack of focus from LCs and lack of        •    Quarterly, analyzing the planned-realized report of each LC’s initiative,
     concrete strategies                            discussing the bottlenekcs, giving feedback, replanning the gaps and making
                                                    the members working for the subprograms interract with the AIESEC Network
                                                    (eg. sharing from TL to TL, VP to VP)
 •   The changes that the                      •    Continuity with the sub programs, Positioning in the market (new ways to
     international internships area had             promote, LCs can have their personal branding –like in the summer time Cluj
     (new and old acronims) created                 has the dromedary mascot, Pitesti has „Vreau o vara-n alta tara” or „Iesi
     confusion not only through                     afara!”, Brasov has „Vara nu s-a terminat , fa-ti bagaju si ai plecat”- being more
     members but also through our                   present on the market as in, not having events for students only in the
     target (students)                              university, having them to look more for us, custom message for each market –
                                                    eg. Wanna be the first one to know the test subjects? Apply for Global
 •   EPs being for too much time on                 Education program ☺- )
     the platform without a certain
     status                                    •    Infrastructure that is fair, lets say, for both sides. (eg. Platform access to GIP
                                                    EPs - 6 months, GCDP EPs – 3 months, for EPs that are considered hard to
                                                    match, AIESEC Bucharest has a GCP: have one myaiesec.net account and
                                                    encourages the EP to find some internships he would like to apply for, no
                                                    longer than 5 days or another GCP from a LC, where if the EP gets self matched
                                                    in one month 50% discount from the internship fee)




MC VP GIP Outgoing Application                                                          MCC 10-13th January 2013
Tania Șerbănoiu                                             Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3
Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3
Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3AIESEC
 
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak management
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak managementTier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak management
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak managementAIESEC
 
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performance
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performanceoGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performance
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performanceAIESEC
 
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projects
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projectsiGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projects
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projectsAIESEC
 
2014 | Country Summit Output
2014 | Country Summit Output2014 | Country Summit Output
2014 | Country Summit OutputSmriti Sant
 
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JD
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JDTier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JD
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JDAIESEC
 
Agm final presentation
Agm final presentationAgm final presentation
Agm final presentationvlalith
 
National strategic plan AIESEC Romania 12 - 13
National strategic plan   AIESEC Romania 12 - 13National strategic plan   AIESEC Romania 12 - 13
National strategic plan AIESEC Romania 12 - 13alexnegurici
 
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences AIESEC
 
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1AIESEC
 
Specific questionnaire
Specific questionnaireSpecific questionnaire
Specific questionnaireandreea_simona
 
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP AIESEC
 
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4AIESEC
 
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&DiGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&DAIESEC
 
Growth Model
Growth ModelGrowth Model
Growth ModelAIESEC
 
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015aiesec_poland
 
General questionnaire
General questionnaireGeneral questionnaire
General questionnaireOana Burlacu
 
Campaign follow up what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mm
Campaign follow up  what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mmCampaign follow up  what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mm
Campaign follow up what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mmmelissaphelpsmccready
 
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation output
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation outputTeaching sub product definition and recommendation output
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation outputmaggie4667
 
CV Matthew Wray June 2016
CV Matthew Wray June 2016CV Matthew Wray June 2016
CV Matthew Wray June 2016Matthew Wray
 

Tendances (20)

Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3
Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3
Structures and learning oGCDP Tier 3
 
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak management
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak managementTier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak management
Tier 1 oGCDP Structures for peak and off-peak management
 
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performance
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performanceoGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performance
oGIP Tier 2 structures and L&D for increased LC performance
 
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projects
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projectsiGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projects
iGCDP Tier 2 Learning for national and local projects
 
2014 | Country Summit Output
2014 | Country Summit Output2014 | Country Summit Output
2014 | Country Summit Output
 
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JD
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JDTier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JD
Tier 2 oGIP Marketing structures and JD
 
Agm final presentation
Agm final presentationAgm final presentation
Agm final presentation
 
National strategic plan AIESEC Romania 12 - 13
National strategic plan   AIESEC Romania 12 - 13National strategic plan   AIESEC Romania 12 - 13
National strategic plan AIESEC Romania 12 - 13
 
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences
oGIP Capacity for high quality experiences
 
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1
Capacity for high volume iGCDP Tier 1
 
Specific questionnaire
Specific questionnaireSpecific questionnaire
Specific questionnaire
 
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP
Capacity and structures for high quality oGCDP
 
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4
Build capacity and education - iGCDP Tier 4
 
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&DiGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGCDP Tier 3 structures and L&D
 
Growth Model
Growth ModelGrowth Model
Growth Model
 
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015
AIESEC Poland LC's growth model launch at NPM 2015
 
General questionnaire
General questionnaireGeneral questionnaire
General questionnaire
 
Campaign follow up what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mm
Campaign follow up  what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mmCampaign follow up  what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mm
Campaign follow up what to do with a lead 5-24-2012 mm
 
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation output
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation outputTeaching sub product definition and recommendation output
Teaching sub product definition and recommendation output
 
CV Matthew Wray June 2016
CV Matthew Wray June 2016CV Matthew Wray June 2016
CV Matthew Wray June 2016
 

En vedette

General questionnaire tania serbanoiu
General questionnaire tania serbanoiuGeneral questionnaire tania serbanoiu
General questionnaire tania serbanoiuTania Serbanoiu
 
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meeting
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meetingWhy 5.0 for Steering Team meeting
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meetingEnoch Wong
 
Biography tania serbanoiu
Biography tania serbanoiuBiography tania serbanoiu
Biography tania serbanoiuTania Serbanoiu
 
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu gabriel onescu
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu   gabriel onescuEndorsment for tania serbanoiu   gabriel onescu
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu gabriel onescuTania Serbanoiu
 
Executive summary tania serbanoiu
Executive summary tania serbanoiuExecutive summary tania serbanoiu
Executive summary tania serbanoiuTania Serbanoiu
 
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu franziska tescan
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu   franziska tescanEndorsment for tania serbanoiu   franziska tescan
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu franziska tescanTania Serbanoiu
 
The Presentation Come-Back Kid
The Presentation Come-Back KidThe Presentation Come-Back Kid
The Presentation Come-Back KidEthos3
 

En vedette (8)

General questionnaire tania serbanoiu
General questionnaire tania serbanoiuGeneral questionnaire tania serbanoiu
General questionnaire tania serbanoiu
 
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meeting
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meetingWhy 5.0 for Steering Team meeting
Why 5.0 for Steering Team meeting
 
Biography tania serbanoiu
Biography tania serbanoiuBiography tania serbanoiu
Biography tania serbanoiu
 
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu gabriel onescu
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu   gabriel onescuEndorsment for tania serbanoiu   gabriel onescu
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu gabriel onescu
 
Executive summary tania serbanoiu
Executive summary tania serbanoiuExecutive summary tania serbanoiu
Executive summary tania serbanoiu
 
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu franziska tescan
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu   franziska tescanEndorsment for tania serbanoiu   franziska tescan
Endorsment for tania serbanoiu franziska tescan
 
Cv tania serbanoiu
Cv tania serbanoiuCv tania serbanoiu
Cv tania serbanoiu
 
The Presentation Come-Back Kid
The Presentation Come-Back KidThe Presentation Come-Back Kid
The Presentation Come-Back Kid
 

Similaire à Specific questionnaire gi po tania serbanoiu

Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement
Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement
Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement maggie4667
 
The Very Last General Assembly
The Very Last General AssemblyThe Very Last General Assembly
The Very Last General Assembly647435
 
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of OD
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of ODTier 1 and Tier 2 role of OD
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of ODAIESEC
 
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members Application
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members ApplicationAIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members Application
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members ApplicationFoo Fonsey
 
Output for the network gip
Output for the network   gip Output for the network   gip
Output for the network gip Camila Soares
 
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd round
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd roundNST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd round
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd roundKOMENAN Boka
 
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIVApplication NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIVKOMENAN Boka
 
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015Lidia Jurisich
 
Global national strategies
Global national strategiesGlobal national strategies
Global national strategiesMarília Tosetto
 
Summer internship - Report
Summer internship - ReportSummer internship - Report
Summer internship - ReportSublaxmi Gupta
 
Corporate Development plan
Corporate Development planCorporate Development plan
Corporate Development planOana Burlacu
 
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementation
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementationiGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementation
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementationAIESEC
 
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth Model
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth ModelAIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth Model
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth ModelGuiscardo Urso
 
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&DiGIP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&DAIESEC
 
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...AIESEC UNDIP
 
Sales Training Presentation
Sales Training PresentationSales Training Presentation
Sales Training PresentationSaurabh Bhatia
 

Similaire à Specific questionnaire gi po tania serbanoiu (20)

Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement
Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement
Aiesec international 2012 2013 strategy achievement
 
The Very Last General Assembly
The Very Last General AssemblyThe Very Last General Assembly
The Very Last General Assembly
 
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of OD
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of ODTier 1 and Tier 2 role of OD
Tier 1 and Tier 2 role of OD
 
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members Application
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members ApplicationAIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members Application
AIESEC in SIM 14/15 Team Leaders & Team Members Application
 
Output for the network gip
Output for the network   gip Output for the network   gip
Output for the network gip
 
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd round
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd roundNST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd round
NST & MANAGER MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV 2nd round
 
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIVApplication NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV
Application NST & Manager MC 18 19 AIESEC in CIV
 
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015
Lidija Jurisich, CV, Jan 2015
 
6. specific questions
6. specific questions6. specific questions
6. specific questions
 
Excellent performance LC award application
Excellent performance LC award applicationExcellent performance LC award application
Excellent performance LC award application
 
Global national strategies
Global national strategiesGlobal national strategies
Global national strategies
 
Day Two: oGIP
Day Two: oGIPDay Two: oGIP
Day Two: oGIP
 
Summer internship - Report
Summer internship - ReportSummer internship - Report
Summer internship - Report
 
Capability Improvement Program (CIP)
Capability Improvement Program (CIP)Capability Improvement Program (CIP)
Capability Improvement Program (CIP)
 
Corporate Development plan
Corporate Development planCorporate Development plan
Corporate Development plan
 
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementation
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementationiGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementation
iGIP Tier 2 Structures, L&D and Team Minimums implementation
 
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth Model
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth ModelAIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth Model
AIESEC| Italy 1415| MC | Expansion Growth Model
 
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&DiGIP Tier 3 structures and L&D
iGIP Tier 3 structures and L&D
 
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...
NSC2015 - Lcp meeting + mc planning output presentation + functional reality ...
 
Sales Training Presentation
Sales Training PresentationSales Training Presentation
Sales Training Presentation
 

Specific questionnaire gi po tania serbanoiu

  • 1. 1. Present your strategy on how to decrease the delivery time and how to increase the realization rate on Outgoing GIP in AIESEC Romania for the following term. Driving success in our sub programs Continuity Project based Delivery working system Driving Product Based optimizatio growth Growing each LC Branding &Market Improving as GIP EP Center positioning EP Servicing Driving growth in Global Internship Program: Achieving a massive sustainable growth in GIP by driving success in our sub- products or better said Global Programs (IT, Marketing, Education). 1. Driving success in our sub programs by giving our targets (students, companies, members etc) the „WHY”, meaning why do we actually do GIPo, measuring the impact it has on our targets and reacting to their feedback in order to fully measure our success as an organization. Here I also include our members that need to receive strong preparation in order to work for GIP outgoing. 2. Continuity: Due to the changes that the International Internships area had (from OGX to II, from MT,TT,ET,DT to GIP, GCDP, now on sub programs) created confusion not only through members but also through our targets. I would prefer to make sure the sub programs are implemented at the full potential and increase their visibility and relevance. 3. Growing each LC as a GIP Center focused both on internal and external recruitment: 3.1 internal recruitment through the development of integrated experiences to ensure qualitative transformation and organizational goal achievement (conversion of TMP/TLP to GIP ) 3.2 external recruitment through supply and demand analyze tool and macro EP profile provided by the MC Delivery optimization: improve and invent operation processes, systems and tools in order to maximize the delivery of experiences. 1. Project based working system: as an ex participant and also a coordinator of a non formal education project I see the working system very relevant for our sub programs implementation. Therefore, I encourage the Grow structure of implementation ( meaning not all LCs have to do Grow but the ones who do it have the framework and timeline in order to be national aligned and have a concrete tracking an evaluation). I see myself as an MC VP working with my LC VPs team and my NST team. Also, my NST team (as project managers for the sub programs) will be working with the Team Leaders from the LCs in order to make them more responsible and aware of the AIESEC network. The local team working on the sub program and even the MC should have a synergy between II, COMM and TD members. 2. Branding and Market positioning: as I mentioned above, I want to focus on continuity and increase the awareness of the sub programs based on a clear market positioning, credibility and a long lasting brand. Since some sub programs were already implemented for the first round, what I think it is necessary now is a brand evolution towards stronger market positioning. Also, since we strive to implement national sub programs, a national event on each program (GIP or GCDP) could be : The Internships Fair. Imagine it like a “Global Village” but presenting specific internships in specific countries. It’s a really big opportunity to attract or involve partners (NGOs, companies, MC partners from abroad) and it could be organized for both GIP and GCDP programs at the suitable peak for each of them. Signing partnerships with top performing countries on Corporate Incoming. (eg. For beeing one of the best IT countries, AI has Romania the number one priority for IT EPs, the partnership we have with AIESEC in Norway for IT Internships). I believe this will help us have a „targeted matching market”. 3. Improving EP Servicing : MC VP GIP Outgoing Application MCC 10-13th January 2013 Tania Șerbănoiu Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
  • 2. 3.1 Having an EP selection process involving alumni or partners with selection experience either to prepare the members who do it or participate themselves at the interviews. 3.2 Every EP should have an EP Buddy, cultural preparation, GIP preparation and AIESEC preparation. 3.3 Having a tool such as CRM but on GIP Outgoing: Internal: tracking on each term, on each recruitment on faculties the number of students applying for internships, passing the interviews, raised, having interviews and getting matched External: tracking the countries, LCs maybe even the pools with the status on matching messages, the number of interviews had with our EPs, the positive/negative answers, matched and realized 2. What should be the evolution of each sub program on Outgoing GIP? What are the concrete steps you are going to take in order to reach the performance stated? Main sub programs: Global IT, Global Education, Global Marketing Pilot: Global Engineering, Global Business For the main subprograms it will be much easier to describe the evolution as they were already created and implemented in the LCs. An evaluation should be made in order to assure an improvement on them or compare each LC market to see if a certain subprogram is relevant or sustainable for it and do the replanning. As the evaluation wasn’t done yet because some of them didn’t finish the implementation I will present my way of seeing their evolution. Projects Main suppliers Operations Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Global IT Finland, Sweden, Promo&sales Norway, the Raising Netherlands, Matching India, Brazil, Realization Canada, USA Global Edu Central Eastern Promo&sales Europe Raising Matching Realization Global Mk ASIA Promo&sales Raising Matching Realization Global Eng Western Europe Promo&sales Raising Matching Realization 1.Global IT • Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the IT sector • Market needs: Companies need IT students with project management and team skills, IT students are future entrepreneurs in the IT market and they need leadership and management skills, a high number of companies that want Romanian IT students • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in IT global environment, working in cutting edge between technology, entrepreneurship and business management skills • Target: Students and recent graduates with backgrounds like Web development and management, Database management, Software development & Programming, System analysis & design, Graphics Design, Industry / civil engineering • Objectives: Clear positioning of the subprogram on the market, Support LCs to implement, track and evaluate their own strategy on the subprogram making sure the message is in accordance with the MC directions, LC VPs receive the needed preparation in order for them to prepare the people that are going to work for the subprogram • Key Activities: A.Supply and demand management (Focus on main suppliers for Romania) B.Ongoing recruitment , depending also on each LC’s planning and capacity to implement (Nov - Dec/ Jan - Feb / March - May/ Aug - Sept) C.Preparation program for EPs (AIESEC/ICPS/Leadership and Management/Soft Skills) D.Matching and Realizing MC VP GIP Outgoing Application MCC 10-13th January 2013 Tania Șerbănoiu Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
  • 3. E.Reintegration and possible Re Raising • National support: assure the alignment regarding the message, the period the events are taking place (eg. The Internship Fair I mentioned in the strategy at point1 ), the materials (posters, flyers, AFs, selection materials, matching tools), tracking with the help of the NST, through SONA and Skype/Functional Meetings with the LC VPs, R&R (the LCs that reached their planning with receive a recognition) For the other Global sub programs I propose the same strategy as Global IT with some little differences: 2. Global Education: • Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the educational sector • Market needs: Few vacancy jobs for students matching the subprogram’s profile, lack of opportunities to develop experience, a high number of TNs on myaiesec.net platform and also a new trend in AI • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in education, professional experience in a global environment, in sub-areas such as child learning, student learning and adult learning, improving English and teaching skills • Target: Young Teachers, students and recent graduates with knowledge in: Teaching English, Cultural Interaction, Development of personality and character, Consultancy Education and Career 3. Global Marketing: • Description: Targeted recruitment based on professional development regarding the marketing sector • Market needs: Companies need students capable to design new and attractive marketing strategies, multinational companies ask for experience in international marketing and trade, high number of graduates from faculties with the background required for the EP profile, students don’t have the opportunities to get relevant experience for a job in this field • Purpose: Diversity and new methods in marketing, professional experience in a global environment, working in different markets (developed countries, emerging countries etc),entrepreneurship and business management skills • Target: Students and recent graduates, Marketing ,Advertising and PR International Relations, International Marketing, Market research, Communication Economics , other if the student worked in the marketing field (Import & Export, Consumer & Buyer Behaviour, product planning & control etc) From the Pilot Subprograms I would recommed Global Engineering to be implemented because of the high market needs, rather than Global Business, when at this point, the TNs on the platform and the trends observed require in the majority of the cases marketing, management, education or selling experience. TNs that don’t require any other experience are usually in China or India and are based on hotel management. It is a quite high risk for students to compare or associate us with Work&Travel Program that has many jobs in the hotel industry. Also, the fields from Global Business could be included in Global Mk so there isn’t the need (at least for the moment) to have another sub program created. 3. How will you manage the marketing strategy of AIESEC Romania on Outgoing GIP taking into consideration the national sub programs. In my opinion, marketing is a strategy to connect and develop a meaningful relationship with a prospective client. Firstly, we need to orient our organization to the external environment more than ever, because responding to the needs of our local environment will stimulate our progress. Speaking from a true marketing point of view, when we try to sell GIPo (to EPs or TNs) we should take into consideration 4 aspects: the product, the price, the place and the promotion. For the potential EPs, we have to give them the WHY, why do we do GIPo and why should they take this opportunity. I believe that the answer stays exactly in the context we all know and promote about AIESEC: helping youth to develop personally and professionally. GIPo represents the point that reaches professional development. It offers you the concrete environment to see what you are capable of and how can you manage yourself in a corporate environment. Even I, as a young person of the Romanian society, can say that a main requirement from the employment market is the experience required. Companies appreciate any attempt to work. As students or recent graduaters, students don’t have too many possibilities in order to fulfil this requirement. Here is where AIESEC makes its presence felt. Accessing the GIPo program youth can develop personally but especially professionally. The added value of a student that took an internship through GIP program from other can be: the experience accumulated, the international working environment, the way of seeing and doing things after having to deal with them already, having the ability and the adaptability to work with people you’ve never worked before and so on. Having well prepared employees help the company to increase its performance and sustainability. This kind of experience could easily be associated with subprograms like Global IT, Global Engineering, Global Business or Global Marketing. A trend available on myaiesec.net, especially in the Nordic part of Europe demands EPs with IT background. This represents a huge opportunity and also an advantage for Romania, as we are known as one of the best IT providers with very qualitative EPs. MC VP GIP Outgoing Application MCC 10-13th January 2013 Tania Șerbănoiu Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
  • 4. Also, through the Global Education subprogram, a certain improvement could be felt regarding the education system in Romania and could decrease the unemplyment rate of the teachers. Here I can give a true example. One of the EPs matched by AIESEC Pitesti, graduated and couldn’t find a job in Romania. She chose to take 2 GIP opportunities (ETs) and after coming back, she had an impact on the education side by bringing and implementing new ways of teaching and also founded her own English School. Talking about the pricing system on GIPo, I can’t considerate that there will be an alignment of the LCs in Romania regarding the price of the internship fee, because each LC knows its market report. In my opinion, the priority should be the visibility they have on the market with the internships, because having a low visibility and an increase of the products won’t help the GIP Growth. Instead, a price alignment is possible but on the discount side (eg. A percentage discount for self matching, second or third internship experience, alumni, members etc.) Now that visibility was brought into the discussion, it is important that our promotion to reach the target market, the people we are trying to reach. We are capable to be innovative and promote our subprograms in ways that suits both us and our target.Here, I can give an example that I also mentioned above: promoting our GIPo Internships through a national aligned event, an Internship Fair. Speaking with some people from AIESEC Timisoara and AIESEC Iasi, learning a bit from their experiences, I came up with the idea of this fair because we could have the students or recent graduates look for us and we could also have a well known brand. Also, we could bring a representative from the TN Companies as CEEDer for example, to increase the credibility on the market. It is our role to make youth understand that the international internships program is a life changing experience and position ourselves so we can become the first choice for students for their self development. 4. Analyze the performance on Outgoing GIP in the last 3 years in AIESEC Romania. How will you ensure a constant growth in quality and quantity in GIP on the following term? The following statistics are from myaiesec.net GIPo Process 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 1.07.2012-Now accordingly also with AIESEC Romania’s Raised 439 322 404 172 pipeline.Romania in the last 3 years: Matched 137 173 137 68 Realized 141 169 144 63 Based on the statistics on our left: AIESEC Ro GIPo - For the raising process in 2010 we 2009-present had a decrease of 27%, in 2011 an increase of 25,46% and until now we almost reached 600 57,43% from the last term. 400 - For the matching process in 2010 we 200 had an increase of 26,28%, in 2011 a decrease of 20,81% and reached 50,37% from the last 0 term. 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 1.07.2012-Present - For the realizing proces in 2010 we had an increase of 19,86%, in 2011 a decrease Raised Matched Realized of 14,8% and reached 56,25% from the last term Also, we seem to have a high number of Raised, but a low number of Realized. For the GIPo Growth (in quality and quantity) and also for the increasing of the realization rate we need be aware of our product and make sure that the initiatives are implemented at a full potential in each LC. In order to make that sure, 3 steps must be followed: implementation, tracking and evaluating. I consider AIESEC Romania lucky, because on 2012-2013 term we already have the subprograms and the Business Models, we just have to make sure they are well implemented. And by „well” I mean 1. Clear positioning (as I mentioned above, at question 1, targeted recruitments, national aligned events, assessments, partnerships) 2. Healthy HR processes (first of all, a good planning, quarterly evalued and give feedback on it, involving alumni, partners with selection experience, goal setting for every EP, having an EP Buddy and a tracking system for the EPs) 3.LC Education (providing education materials and trainings for LC VPs and their members, making people want to work for the internship programs (personal discussions, stories, combine the personal with professional part), maintaining the international internships culture, encouraging networking –LC to LC, LC to NST) A good case practice from this term is having the NST team as project managers on the subprograms. For example, each NST member is responsible for a Global initiative and has meeting with TLs from the LC to keep tracking on them, gives MC VP GIP Outgoing Application MCC 10-13th January 2013 Tania Șerbănoiu Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!
  • 5. support on the initiative, is in charge to maintain the „partnership management” if there is one on the initiative he is responsible for. I would consider motivating and competitive if a R&R system is implemented for each subprogram. Good case practices from countries that had the biggest growth on GIPo: Poland: o They used market segmentation and product package and develop new programs such as: Business Program, Technical Top Talent, HIV/AIDs. o The Recruitments is very flexible, at minumun 3 months. o National Projects: Discover Program and Teach the World o National Partnership on National projects: Discover Russia, Discover China etc. Brazil: o First country to implement the sub programs concept or recruiting o Maintaining the X+L strategy, having campaigns like „Match the Leaders of AIESEC Brazil” o Structure: Different strategies for GIP/GCDP o VPs from other CY in NSTs 5. Present the main bottlenecks that kept AIESEC Romania from achieving the objectives planned on Outgoing GIP. What will be the key strategies for each of them, that you are going to implement in order to achieve the objectives planned? Bottlenecks Solutions • TN Managers that don’t reply and • CRM system implemented (as I mentioned above), Diversify promo methods EPs give up (eg. this term we had an online promo that was called „BEST EPs” and an EP searchtool „AIESEC Romania-probably the best EPs in the world), MC VPs should create a strong connection with the other MC VPs and have my NST team as project managers • Few members working for GIPo • Attracting the members to work for GIPo, promoting the „Exchange Culture”, (it can be seen in SONA) sometimes the International Internships area turned out to be the most united team (in work and fun), showing concrete benefits and stories, make the members feel they can be a part of something bigger than themselves, providing life changing experiences. Using the NST as project managers and having them to keep tracking on their initiative, having regular Skype meetings with TLs from the LCs • Lack of focus from LCs and lack of • Quarterly, analyzing the planned-realized report of each LC’s initiative, concrete strategies discussing the bottlenekcs, giving feedback, replanning the gaps and making the members working for the subprograms interract with the AIESEC Network (eg. sharing from TL to TL, VP to VP) • The changes that the • Continuity with the sub programs, Positioning in the market (new ways to international internships area had promote, LCs can have their personal branding –like in the summer time Cluj (new and old acronims) created has the dromedary mascot, Pitesti has „Vreau o vara-n alta tara” or „Iesi confusion not only through afara!”, Brasov has „Vara nu s-a terminat , fa-ti bagaju si ai plecat”- being more members but also through our present on the market as in, not having events for students only in the target (students) university, having them to look more for us, custom message for each market – eg. Wanna be the first one to know the test subjects? Apply for Global • EPs being for too much time on Education program ☺- ) the platform without a certain status • Infrastructure that is fair, lets say, for both sides. (eg. Platform access to GIP EPs - 6 months, GCDP EPs – 3 months, for EPs that are considered hard to match, AIESEC Bucharest has a GCP: have one myaiesec.net account and encourages the EP to find some internships he would like to apply for, no longer than 5 days or another GCP from a LC, where if the EP gets self matched in one month 50% discount from the internship fee) MC VP GIP Outgoing Application MCC 10-13th January 2013 Tania Șerbănoiu Raising a hope. Matching a challenge. Realizing a dream!