SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  71
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
why
Q.U.A.L.I.T.Y
Q U A L I TY
Quality Leadership
Quality Leadership
tantangan
• Daya b li meningkat
        beli     i k
•                                gg
  Value dari customer makin tinggi
• Ekspektasi makin ber variasi
• Pilihan makin beragam
• Loyalitas sangat bergoyang
• Membangun Image produk dan service 
  Indonesia itu (bisa) berkualitas
                (    )
• Setiap pekerjaan mensyaratkan Sertifikasi
Not the Desired Outcome for SSME
                            SSME…




        Plan i h
        Pl without proper data
                          d
DATA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS
                                     DI INDONESIA


                               Jumlah Kecelakaan di Indonesia
                                     Tahun 2000-2010
            100000                                          91623
                                                                    87020
             90000
             80000
                                                                                                    66488
             70000                                                                          62960
                                                                                    59164
     ensi




             60000                                                          49553
Frekue




             50000
             40000
             30000
                                                    17732
             20000   12649 12791 12267 13399
             10000
                 0
                     2000
                     2000'   2001
                             2001'   2002   2003
                                            2003'   2004
                                                    2004'   2005
                                                            2005'   2006
                                                                    2006'   2007
                                                                            2007'   2008
                                                                                    2008'   2009
                                                                                            2009'   2010
                                                                                                    2010'

                                     Sumber : Kantor Kepolisiian Republik Indonesia
Sumber: Database KNKT sampai dengan 27 Desember 2011
SERVICE QUALITY




Se ce quality s comparison of
Service qua ty is a co pa so o
expectations with performance
The PDSA Cycle
                y
               Plan



Act




                       Do


      Study
                            9-12
The Process Improvement Cycle
                          Select a
                          p
                          process

         Document

                                         Study/document
                                         St d /d      t


     Evaluate



                                           Seek ways to
   Implement the
                                           Improve it
   Improved process



                         Design an
                      Improved process


                                                          9-13
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
   Cause-and-          g

     Methods                Materials
                                    Cause
        Cause
                   Cause
                   C
                              Cause
                Cause                       Cause
Environment                                         Effect
                Cause              Cause

                   Cause               Cause
        Cause              Cause

    People                 Equipment




                                                             9-14
Run Chart
           0.58
           0 58
           0.56
     ter



           0.54
Diamet




           0.52
            0.5
D




           0.48
           0 48
           0.46
           0.44
           0 44
                  1   2   3   4    5   6   7   8   9   10 11 12

                                  Time (Hours)


                                                                  9-15
Tracking Improvements
              g

 UCL                UCL
                                        UCL




                                        LCL
                    LCL
                                        Additional improvements
 LCL                 Process centered   made to the process
Process not centered and stable
P          t   t   d
and not stable




Commitment to reduce Variation

                                                                  9-16
Methods for Generating Ideas
                     g

B i t
 Brainstorming
           i
 Quality circles
 Interviewing
 Benchmarking
 5W2H




                               9-17
Broad Dimensions of Service                  Q
                                             Quality
                                                   y
   Reliability – perform promised service dependably
              y p         p                  p      y
    and accurately
   Responsiveness - willingness/readiness to provide
    R       i         illi      / di       t      id
    prompt service
   Competence - possess knowledge and skill to perform
    the service
   Access - approachability and ease of contact of
    service personnel
        i           l
   Courtesy - politeness, consideration, and friendliness
            y p          ,              ,
    of service personnel                       cont…
Broad Dimensions of Service Quality – cont.

   Communication - keeping customers informed;
                          p g                 ;
    listening to customers
   C dibilit - trustworthy, believable, honest
    Credibility t t     th b li bl h          t
   Security - freedom from danger, risk, or doubt
   Understanding/knowing customer - knowing
    customer s needs
    customer’s
   Tangibles - physical evidence of service



   Parasuraman, A. Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. (1985).
Whose perspective?
                                          Lens of the
                                         organisation
      people
                      products
processes         service



                                      results
               outcomes
                           benefits
 Lens of the
  customer
                                                  20
Quality menurut
       Quality menurut siapa?
• Banyak lembaga memberi award tentang
        y
  Quality
• Siapa yang paling pantas menilai ? CUSTOMER!
• A j i
  Apa jaminan nya ? S
                   ? Sustainability!!!
                          i bili !!!
Return on Quality
   • Satisfaction is measured for all key
     processes, as well as overall
                      ll        ll
   • Attractive to managers (
                         g (but does need
     customer survey data, internal company
     information and competitor financial
                           p
     information as inputs)
   • Service based become knowledge base
   • Does satisfaction precede quality?
kresnayana yahya
Scorecard




                     
      Employee             Customer
     Satisfaction         Satisfaction




    Accountability
      & Process
                  y
                          Financial
                            Results



                               Copyright © 2004 Service Strategies Corporation
90%




               ABC LtdLtd.
                 ABC




Satisfaction
     f               70%


   Index
   80.4%             60%




                     50%




                             24
QUALITY PROCESS
QUALITY ASSURANCE
         QUALITY ASSURANCE
• DARI DESIGN  process sampai Design Perilaku
• Dari VISI dan Quality Value bisa membangun
  Dari VISI dan Quality Value bisa
  Quality Culture
• M j i secara b k l j
  Menjamin           berkelanjutan
  Perilaku, sikap, tanggung jawab kerja
QU
QUALITY OF LIFE
        O
Tumbuh ditengah kesemrawutan




    Quality Perilaku di jalan
The 
                           Education 
                           Ed ti
                             Factor
                                                    The 
The Health 
The Health                                        Spiritual 
and Safety                                         Factor
  Factor
                       QUALITY
                       QUA ITY
                         OF
                        LIFE
The work                                          The Family 
                                                           y
 factor                                             Factor

                 The 
                                    The Stress 
              Psycholigi
                                      Factor
              cal Factor
                lF t
It appears the United States isn’t one of 
     pp
the top countries offering the best quality‐of‐
 life according to the Economist Intelligence Unit 
  (EIU, a sister company of The Economist) which 
  (EIU a sister company of The Economist) which
 “earnestly” tried to figure out which country will 
provide “the best opportunities for a healthy, safe 
                 and prosperous life.”
                 and prosperous life.
Qualitative Perceptions
RETURN ON QUALITY




        Return on Quality (ROQ):
Making Service QualityFinancially Accountable
QUALITY IS F R E E !!!
                     F.R.E.E.




“Quality is the result of a carefully constructed cultura
environment.
environment It has to be the fabric of the organization
                                             organization,
         not part of the fabric.” – Phil Crosby
Quality Improvement



Model
M d l
QUALITY IS K E Y
           K.E.Y.
Kaizen process

 Focus            : Customers.
                     Customers
 Strategy         : Continuous small steps.
 Approach         : Start with what you have.
 Methodology      : Change what you have & learn.
 Process          : Simultaneous process.
 Value addition
  Value-addition   : Eliminate non-value added
                               non value
                     processes.
 Human resource : People involved in the operation.
                                          operation
 Technology       : Less technology required.
The Kaizen Umbrella




• Customer orientation,           • Kanban,

• TQC,                            • Quality improvement,

• Robotics,                       • Just-in-time,

• Suggestion system,              • Zero defects,

            ,
• Automation,                     • Small group activities,

• Discipline in work place,       • Cooperative labour
                                  management relations,
• TPM
  TPM.
                                  • Productivity improvement,
                                  • New-product improvement.
Quality Culture

 Values are building blocks of culture; organizational values
constitute the culture of the organizations, the set of beliefs that
                              organizations
people share about what sort of behaviour is correct & incorrect.


A Quality (TQM) culture can be created, if the management of
an organization starts learning the values of people.


A Quality culture is reflected through :
        B li f in Quality / Strategy for Quality / Leadership-
          Belief i Q lit St t         f Q lit L d hi
       driven / Customer satisfaction / People involvement /
       Empowerment.
Changes required to implement Quality Culture

    From Traditional Culture                    To TQM Culture
•    Hierarchy style,                    •   Participative style,
•    Top-down information flow,          •   Top, upward & lateral flow,
•    Inward quality focus,
                    focus                •   Customer-driven
                                             Customer driven quality focus,
                                                                      focus
•    Functional focus,                   •   Process focus,
•    Short-term planning,                •   A vision for the future,
•    Sporadic improvement,               •   Continual improvement,
•    Manage & Delegate,                  •   Lead & Coach,
•    Counsel,                            •   Ownership & Participation,
•    Direct,                             •   Empower,
•    Firefighting with few individuals   •   Team initiatives, group focusing
     / groups
       groups,                               on continual improvement,
                                                           improvement
•    Enforcement.                        •   Mutual trust.
Principles of Quality Improvement
“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result
of high intention sincere effort intelligent direction
        intention,          effort,
and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice
of many alternatives.
          alternatives.”

                  William Foster
                  (many variations attributed to others)
                                                           44
   Personnel understand the benefits and empowerment
                                              p
    of working within a quality oriented system
           Defined processes
           Efficiencies
           Measurement tools
           Defensibility
   Quality Points of View
     Internal quality – conformance to the project design
     External quality – Receiving the expected service that meets the
      project requirements



                           Quality Culture
Quality
Assurance
Training
   Management consists of
       planning
       organizing,
       directing,
       assurance, and
       control.
Effective supervisors must be adaptable and be able to maintain
    their perspective in the face of rapidly changing conditions.
                                                      conditions




©                                                                     1–50
© 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All
rights reserved.                    1–51
Performance Management


   Standards for
   Public Health
                       QI Plans &
                        Councils



                                    QI
                                    Q Methods
                                      & Tools
 Improving PH      Business
   p
   processes       Process
                   Analysis
SUSTAINABLE QUALITY CONCEPTS
Perusakan lingkungan hidup
• Mindset dan perilaku manusia yang pertama
  dan utama
• Motif ekonomi yang tidak peduli
  keberlanjutan
• Process monitoring
PERFORMANCE
Performance Measurement
 e o a ce easu e e                    MEASUREMENT
                                         SU




     Monitoring of               Monitoring
     Performance             of Indicators and
• Review of performance          Outcomes
                                 O t
  (Accreditation/Self-    • Process and short-term
  Assessment) results       outcomes
• Program evaluation      • Health indicators and
  results                   outcomes
Use Data to Make Decisions
56


                    Use
                     U performance
                            f
                     assessment data to target
                     improvement
                    Use data analysis tools to
                     develop information
                    Analyze data to identify root
                     cause
                    Use data to monitor
                     p
                     performance outcomes
                    Develop data base for
                     Planning
                            g
The W-Model
Customer needs                                     Acceptance
                                                      test
                                                                Test procedure,
                                                             test case inspections

    Requirements                              System
                                               y
                 Requirements                  test
                  inspections                           Test procedure,
                                                     test case inspections
     Architectural design
                   HLD inspections
                                     Integration
                                         test
                                                 Test procedure
                                                      procedure,
           Detailed design                    test case inspections
                          DD inspections

                            Unit t t
                            U it test
                                       Test procedure,
                        Code        test case inspections

                                Code inspections


                                57
Building a House of Quality

                                     CONTINUOUS
                                    IMPROVEMENT




                                  TATIONS
  STOMER FOCUS




                                                                ASSESSMENT &
                                                         MENT




                                                                       ACK
                        HIGH EXPECT




                                                   NVOLVEM




                                                                  FEEDBA
CUS




                           H




                                                  IN




                                                                A
                  MANAGEMENT WITH FACTS
                          TRUST
                 SHARED VALUES AND VISION
Requirements
                                          Delight

3                          5    Human
    Customers
                               Resource
                               R                    7
                                 Focus
    1       Leadership                                  Results


        2       Strategy
                                Process
                           6   Management



            Dashboard to Monitor Progress
                                   4   Information and Analysis
- 60 -
          Hierarchical Structure of Services

                     Customer
                     C stomer
                    Satisfaction                      Service site


        Employee                                  Providing layer
       Satisfaction                       Service                 Understanding
                                     recommendation                 methods
                                       technologies           & Sensing technologies


       Social
     Satisfaction
     S ti f ti             Collaborating aids                          Modeling technologies
                         among staffs/providers                         of large-scale data
                                                   Supporting
                                                     layer
                                                       y

                       Collaborating aids                                     Understanding
                       among institutes                                    methods for daily living
                                                  Collaboration
                                                      layer
60
61
Kerugian karena tidak ber Quality
     • Buang air besar dan tidak punya sanitasi
       merugikan ratusan triliun
            g
     • Quality leadership dari sisi mental : korupsi
       merugikan ratusan triliun
     • Quality process yang buruk : gagal menaikkan
       upah pekerja lebih dari 30 %
     • Layanan buruk meniadakan keberhasilan
       marketing sampai 30 – 40 %
     • Menutupi Quality dengan kamuflase pencitraan
       menghancurkan perusahaan
           g           p
62
Defisit yang terjadi
     •   Pemahaman tentang Quality secara terintegrasi
     •   Pendataan sebagai pra syarat Merancang
     •   Pengembangan system management terpadu
     •   Peduli Cost dan Financial result
     •   Melatih,
         Melatih melakukan mentoring Coaching
                            mentoring,
     •   Layanan Publik
     •   Consumer masih “nerimo”
     •   Penghargaan pada berpikir , knowledge base
         masih rendah

63
67




  Why Improve service


•Service i t ki
 S i is taking
 action to create
    i
value for someone
       else
68
A thought to end!
         A thought to end!
• “You must be 
  the change you 
  the change you
  wish to see in 
  the world”
Thank You
  a    ou




                        Action

            “c” change in classified
            “c” change in classified
END OF SLIDES
                    THANK YOU

Kresnayana Yahya
Email: kresna49@yahoo.com
Blog: http://www.kresnayana.com
                     kresnayana yahya  energy development 
                                                             71
                                   jawa bali 2012

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)
Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)
Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)Teguh Andoria
 
Penduduk, Demografi, dan Pemilu
Penduduk, Demografi, dan PemiluPenduduk, Demografi, dan Pemilu
Penduduk, Demografi, dan PemiluTeguh Andoria
 
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garam
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garamPeningkatan kesejahteraan industri garam
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garamTeguh Andoria
 
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran Idea
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran IdeaPeran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran Idea
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran IdeaTeguh Andoria
 
Tantangan anak muda Indonesia
Tantangan anak muda IndonesiaTantangan anak muda Indonesia
Tantangan anak muda IndonesiaTeguh Andoria
 
Kupas bisnis personal branding
Kupas bisnis personal brandingKupas bisnis personal branding
Kupas bisnis personal brandingTeguh Andoria
 
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarang
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarangTantangan pengembangan statistik semarang
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarangTeguh Andoria
 
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnis
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnisFranchising sebagai peluang bisnis
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnisTeguh Andoria
 
Education challenge learning capability
Education challenge learning capabilityEducation challenge learning capability
Education challenge learning capabilityTeguh Andoria
 
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shop
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shopKupas bisnis bakery and cake shop
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shopTeguh Andoria
 
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 preview
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 previewTantangan pendidikan abad 21 preview
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 previewTeguh Andoria
 
Pembelajaran dengan ict
Pembelajaran dengan ictPembelajaran dengan ict
Pembelajaran dengan ictTeguh Andoria
 
Statistik untuk kehidupan
Statistik untuk kehidupanStatistik untuk kehidupan
Statistik untuk kehidupanTeguh Andoria
 

En vedette (15)

Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)
Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)
Creative Industry (Commercial Product, Branding and Image Building)
 
Penduduk, Demografi, dan Pemilu
Penduduk, Demografi, dan PemiluPenduduk, Demografi, dan Pemilu
Penduduk, Demografi, dan Pemilu
 
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garam
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garamPeningkatan kesejahteraan industri garam
Peningkatan kesejahteraan industri garam
 
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran Idea
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran IdeaPeran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran Idea
Peran Social Media Dalam Business dan Dampaknya Untuk Penyebaran Idea
 
Tantangan anak muda Indonesia
Tantangan anak muda IndonesiaTantangan anak muda Indonesia
Tantangan anak muda Indonesia
 
Kupas bisnis personal branding
Kupas bisnis personal brandingKupas bisnis personal branding
Kupas bisnis personal branding
 
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarang
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarangTantangan pengembangan statistik semarang
Tantangan pengembangan statistik semarang
 
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnis
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnisFranchising sebagai peluang bisnis
Franchising sebagai peluang bisnis
 
Education challenge learning capability
Education challenge learning capabilityEducation challenge learning capability
Education challenge learning capability
 
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shop
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shopKupas bisnis bakery and cake shop
Kupas bisnis bakery and cake shop
 
Kupas bisnis eo
Kupas bisnis eoKupas bisnis eo
Kupas bisnis eo
 
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 preview
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 previewTantangan pendidikan abad 21 preview
Tantangan pendidikan abad 21 preview
 
Ekonomi kelautan
Ekonomi kelautanEkonomi kelautan
Ekonomi kelautan
 
Pembelajaran dengan ict
Pembelajaran dengan ictPembelajaran dengan ict
Pembelajaran dengan ict
 
Statistik untuk kehidupan
Statistik untuk kehidupanStatistik untuk kehidupan
Statistik untuk kehidupan
 

Similaire à Why quality

Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419
Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419
Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419Louise Tincher
 
First green company credentials and Leed
First green company credentials and LeedFirst green company credentials and Leed
First green company credentials and Leedfirstgreen
 
Analysis of Revenue guidance - Infosys
Analysis of Revenue guidance - InfosysAnalysis of Revenue guidance - Infosys
Analysis of Revenue guidance - InfosysSarasvathi T.A
 
Turnover reduction control phase
Turnover reduction control phaseTurnover reduction control phase
Turnover reduction control phasekellykozik
 
Br visual research
Br   visual researchBr   visual research
Br visual researchbedfordgrp
 
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...Anand Kumar Tiwari
 
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis  PresentationField Time Effeicincy Analysis  Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis PresentationMohamed Hassan
 
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis  PresentationField Time Effeicincy Analysis  Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis PresentationMohamed Hassan
 
Jmd Presentation, Company Profile
Jmd Presentation, Company ProfileJmd Presentation, Company Profile
Jmd Presentation, Company Profilejyoti_dhingra
 
IBF Panel on Future of S&OP
IBF Panel on Future of S&OPIBF Panel on Future of S&OP
IBF Panel on Future of S&OPLora Cecere
 
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASHUltra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASHBitmovin Inc
 
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017Yvette Coetzer
 
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Model
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) ModelForesquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Model
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Modelforesquare
 
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01Femi Adebayo
 

Similaire à Why quality (20)

Sitex orbis a case study
Sitex orbis   a case studySitex orbis   a case study
Sitex orbis a case study
 
Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419
Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419
Quality improvement for documentation case study 20120419
 
I gip tn
I gip tnI gip tn
I gip tn
 
First green company credentials and Leed
First green company credentials and LeedFirst green company credentials and Leed
First green company credentials and Leed
 
Analysis of Revenue guidance - Infosys
Analysis of Revenue guidance - InfosysAnalysis of Revenue guidance - Infosys
Analysis of Revenue guidance - Infosys
 
Turnover reduction control phase
Turnover reduction control phaseTurnover reduction control phase
Turnover reduction control phase
 
Br visual research
Br   visual researchBr   visual research
Br visual research
 
Offsite ppt1
Offsite ppt1Offsite ppt1
Offsite ppt1
 
How to estimate required resources
How to estimate required resourcesHow to estimate required resources
How to estimate required resources
 
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...
A project report on dlw export procedure to non railway customer by anand kum...
 
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis  PresentationField Time Effeicincy Analysis  Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
 
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis  PresentationField Time Effeicincy Analysis  Presentation
Field Time Effeicincy Analysis Presentation
 
Our True Story - Update Training, Auditing and Beyond
Our True Story - Update Training, Auditing and BeyondOur True Story - Update Training, Auditing and Beyond
Our True Story - Update Training, Auditing and Beyond
 
Jmd Presentation, Company Profile
Jmd Presentation, Company ProfileJmd Presentation, Company Profile
Jmd Presentation, Company Profile
 
cpk
cpkcpk
cpk
 
IBF Panel on Future of S&OP
IBF Panel on Future of S&OPIBF Panel on Future of S&OP
IBF Panel on Future of S&OP
 
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASHUltra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
 
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017
Curriculum vitae of Yvette Coetzer 2017
 
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Model
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) ModelForesquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Model
Foresquare Time Sharing Partner (TSP) Model
 
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01
Qualitysurveyreport120312 120325200627-phpapp01
 

Why quality

  • 3. tantangan • Daya b li meningkat beli i k • gg Value dari customer makin tinggi • Ekspektasi makin ber variasi • Pilihan makin beragam • Loyalitas sangat bergoyang • Membangun Image produk dan service  Indonesia itu (bisa) berkualitas ( ) • Setiap pekerjaan mensyaratkan Sertifikasi
  • 4. Not the Desired Outcome for SSME SSME… Plan i h Pl without proper data d
  • 5. DATA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DI INDONESIA Jumlah Kecelakaan di Indonesia Tahun 2000-2010 100000 91623 87020 90000 80000 66488 70000 62960 59164 ensi 60000 49553 Frekue 50000 40000 30000 17732 20000 12649 12791 12267 13399 10000 0 2000 2000' 2001 2001' 2002 2003 2003' 2004 2004' 2005 2005' 2006 2006' 2007 2007' 2008 2008' 2009 2009' 2010 2010' Sumber : Kantor Kepolisiian Republik Indonesia
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. Sumber: Database KNKT sampai dengan 27 Desember 2011
  • 10.
  • 11. SERVICE QUALITY Se ce quality s comparison of Service qua ty is a co pa so o expectations with performance
  • 12. The PDSA Cycle y Plan Act Do Study 9-12
  • 13. The Process Improvement Cycle Select a p process Document Study/document St d /d t Evaluate Seek ways to Implement the Improve it Improved process Design an Improved process 9-13
  • 14. Cause-and-Effect Diagram Cause-and- g Methods Materials Cause Cause Cause C Cause Cause Cause Environment Effect Cause Cause Cause Cause Cause Cause People Equipment 9-14
  • 15. Run Chart 0.58 0 58 0.56 ter 0.54 Diamet 0.52 0.5 D 0.48 0 48 0.46 0.44 0 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (Hours) 9-15
  • 16. Tracking Improvements g UCL UCL UCL LCL LCL Additional improvements LCL Process centered made to the process Process not centered and stable P t t d and not stable Commitment to reduce Variation 9-16
  • 17. Methods for Generating Ideas g B i t Brainstorming i  Quality circles  Interviewing  Benchmarking  5W2H 9-17
  • 18. Broad Dimensions of Service Q Quality y  Reliability – perform promised service dependably y p p p y and accurately  Responsiveness - willingness/readiness to provide R i illi / di t id prompt service  Competence - possess knowledge and skill to perform the service  Access - approachability and ease of contact of service personnel i l  Courtesy - politeness, consideration, and friendliness y p , , of service personnel cont…
  • 19. Broad Dimensions of Service Quality – cont.  Communication - keeping customers informed; p g ; listening to customers  C dibilit - trustworthy, believable, honest Credibility t t th b li bl h t  Security - freedom from danger, risk, or doubt  Understanding/knowing customer - knowing customer s needs customer’s  Tangibles - physical evidence of service  Parasuraman, A. Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. (1985).
  • 20. Whose perspective? Lens of the organisation people products processes service results outcomes benefits Lens of the customer 20
  • 21. Quality menurut Quality menurut siapa? • Banyak lembaga memberi award tentang y Quality • Siapa yang paling pantas menilai ? CUSTOMER! • A j i Apa jaminan nya ? S ? Sustainability!!! i bili !!!
  • 22. Return on Quality • Satisfaction is measured for all key processes, as well as overall ll ll • Attractive to managers ( g (but does need customer survey data, internal company information and competitor financial p information as inputs) • Service based become knowledge base • Does satisfaction precede quality? kresnayana yahya
  • 23. Scorecard   Employee Customer Satisfaction Satisfaction  Accountability & Process y  Financial Results Copyright © 2004 Service Strategies Corporation
  • 24. 90% ABC LtdLtd. ABC Satisfaction f 70% Index 80.4% 60% 50% 24
  • 26. QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE • DARI DESIGN  process sampai Design Perilaku • Dari VISI dan Quality Value bisa membangun Dari VISI dan Quality Value bisa Quality Culture • M j i secara b k l j Menjamin berkelanjutan Perilaku, sikap, tanggung jawab kerja
  • 28. Tumbuh ditengah kesemrawutan Quality Perilaku di jalan
  • 29. The  Education  Ed ti Factor The  The Health  The Health Spiritual  and Safety  Factor Factor QUALITY QUA ITY OF LIFE The work  The Family  y factor Factor The  The Stress  Psycholigi Factor cal Factor lF t
  • 30. It appears the United States isn’t one of  pp the top countries offering the best quality‐of‐ life according to the Economist Intelligence Unit  (EIU, a sister company of The Economist) which  (EIU a sister company of The Economist) which “earnestly” tried to figure out which country will  provide “the best opportunities for a healthy, safe  and prosperous life.” and prosperous life.
  • 32. RETURN ON QUALITY Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service QualityFinancially Accountable
  • 33.
  • 34. QUALITY IS F R E E !!! F.R.E.E. “Quality is the result of a carefully constructed cultura environment. environment It has to be the fabric of the organization organization, not part of the fabric.” – Phil Crosby
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39. QUALITY IS K E Y K.E.Y.
  • 40. Kaizen process  Focus : Customers. Customers  Strategy : Continuous small steps.  Approach : Start with what you have.  Methodology : Change what you have & learn.  Process : Simultaneous process.  Value addition Value-addition : Eliminate non-value added non value processes.  Human resource : People involved in the operation. operation  Technology : Less technology required.
  • 41. The Kaizen Umbrella • Customer orientation, • Kanban, • TQC, • Quality improvement, • Robotics, • Just-in-time, • Suggestion system, • Zero defects, , • Automation, • Small group activities, • Discipline in work place, • Cooperative labour management relations, • TPM TPM. • Productivity improvement, • New-product improvement.
  • 42. Quality Culture  Values are building blocks of culture; organizational values constitute the culture of the organizations, the set of beliefs that organizations people share about what sort of behaviour is correct & incorrect. A Quality (TQM) culture can be created, if the management of an organization starts learning the values of people. A Quality culture is reflected through :  B li f in Quality / Strategy for Quality / Leadership- Belief i Q lit St t f Q lit L d hi driven / Customer satisfaction / People involvement / Empowerment.
  • 43. Changes required to implement Quality Culture From Traditional Culture To TQM Culture • Hierarchy style, • Participative style, • Top-down information flow, • Top, upward & lateral flow, • Inward quality focus, focus • Customer-driven Customer driven quality focus, focus • Functional focus, • Process focus, • Short-term planning, • A vision for the future, • Sporadic improvement, • Continual improvement, • Manage & Delegate, • Lead & Coach, • Counsel, • Ownership & Participation, • Direct, • Empower, • Firefighting with few individuals • Team initiatives, group focusing / groups groups, on continual improvement, improvement • Enforcement. • Mutual trust.
  • 44. Principles of Quality Improvement “Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention sincere effort intelligent direction intention, effort, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives. alternatives.” William Foster (many variations attributed to others) 44
  • 45.
  • 46. Personnel understand the benefits and empowerment p of working within a quality oriented system  Defined processes  Efficiencies  Measurement tools  Defensibility  Quality Points of View  Internal quality – conformance to the project design  External quality – Receiving the expected service that meets the project requirements Quality Culture
  • 48.
  • 49. Management consists of  planning  organizing,  directing,  assurance, and  control.
  • 50. Effective supervisors must be adaptable and be able to maintain their perspective in the face of rapidly changing conditions. conditions © 1–50
  • 51. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 1–51
  • 52. Performance Management Standards for Public Health QI Plans & Councils QI Q Methods & Tools Improving PH Business p processes Process Analysis
  • 54. Perusakan lingkungan hidup • Mindset dan perilaku manusia yang pertama dan utama • Motif ekonomi yang tidak peduli keberlanjutan • Process monitoring
  • 55. PERFORMANCE Performance Measurement e o a ce easu e e MEASUREMENT SU Monitoring of Monitoring Performance of Indicators and • Review of performance Outcomes O t (Accreditation/Self- • Process and short-term Assessment) results outcomes • Program evaluation • Health indicators and results outcomes
  • 56. Use Data to Make Decisions 56  Use U performance f assessment data to target improvement  Use data analysis tools to develop information  Analyze data to identify root cause  Use data to monitor p performance outcomes  Develop data base for Planning g
  • 57. The W-Model Customer needs Acceptance test Test procedure, test case inspections Requirements System y Requirements test inspections Test procedure, test case inspections Architectural design HLD inspections Integration test Test procedure procedure, Detailed design test case inspections DD inspections Unit t t U it test Test procedure, Code test case inspections Code inspections 57
  • 58. Building a House of Quality CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT TATIONS STOMER FOCUS ASSESSMENT & MENT ACK HIGH EXPECT NVOLVEM FEEDBA CUS H IN A MANAGEMENT WITH FACTS TRUST SHARED VALUES AND VISION
  • 59. Requirements Delight 3 5 Human Customers Resource R 7 Focus 1 Leadership Results 2 Strategy Process 6 Management Dashboard to Monitor Progress 4 Information and Analysis
  • 60. - 60 - Hierarchical Structure of Services Customer C stomer Satisfaction Service site Employee Providing layer Satisfaction Service Understanding recommendation methods technologies & Sensing technologies Social Satisfaction S ti f ti Collaborating aids Modeling technologies among staffs/providers of large-scale data Supporting layer y Collaborating aids Understanding among institutes methods for daily living Collaboration layer 60
  • 61. 61
  • 62. Kerugian karena tidak ber Quality • Buang air besar dan tidak punya sanitasi merugikan ratusan triliun g • Quality leadership dari sisi mental : korupsi merugikan ratusan triliun • Quality process yang buruk : gagal menaikkan upah pekerja lebih dari 30 % • Layanan buruk meniadakan keberhasilan marketing sampai 30 – 40 % • Menutupi Quality dengan kamuflase pencitraan menghancurkan perusahaan g p 62
  • 63. Defisit yang terjadi • Pemahaman tentang Quality secara terintegrasi • Pendataan sebagai pra syarat Merancang • Pengembangan system management terpadu • Peduli Cost dan Financial result • Melatih, Melatih melakukan mentoring Coaching mentoring, • Layanan Publik • Consumer masih “nerimo” • Penghargaan pada berpikir , knowledge base masih rendah 63
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67. 67 Why Improve service •Service i t ki S i is taking action to create i value for someone else
  • 68. 68
  • 69. A thought to end! A thought to end! • “You must be  the change you  the change you wish to see in  the world”
  • 70. Thank You a ou Action “c” change in classified “c” change in classified
  • 71. END OF SLIDES THANK YOU Kresnayana Yahya Email: kresna49@yahoo.com Blog: http://www.kresnayana.com kresnayana yahya  energy development  71 jawa bali 2012