![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (19)
En vedette
En vedette (20)
Similaire à Matpresentation2
Similaire à Matpresentation2 (20)
Plus de teufelsdroch
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Matpresentation2
- 1. Peer Review on a Wiki Brandon Wolfe Submitted for completion of Master’s in Arts and Teaching University of Arkansas, 2009
- 5. BUT “ . . .it is business as usual. Computers are enclosed in computer rooms rather than being a central part of the learning experience…it is not necessarily lack of funds, but the lack of adequate training and lack of understanding of how computers can be used to enrich the learning experience.” U.S. Department of Education National Education Technology Report “ Wikis have not yet made it to the classroom, either as a research topic or as a teaching method.” Evans (2006) “ Perhaps one reason that there isn't written a lot about wikis is that they are a generic tool. What makes it to the bigger journals is research on specific theories and practices. There are many things one can do with a wiki” E. Kophler of MIT's Scheller Teacher Education Program
- 6. A Lesson!
- 7. A survey!
- 14. Figure 4 &5:Full survey results, discriminated by period number. ‘Probability of insignificance’ is the p value of a two-way T-test, with two tails and assuming unequal variances. Only questions concerning peer review have been changed significantly.
- 16. Figure 6 &7:Full survey results, discriminated by period number. ‘Probability of insignificance’ is the p value of a two-way T-test, with two tails and assuming unequal variances. This survey question was not affected by changes to the lesson.
- 21. Figure 2: Survey Results in Detail