các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.

1. Acceptances Case 8 – 209 GROUP 13 Dang Phuong Tam Nguyen Van Son Pham Duy Thanh Nguyen Tien Thinh

2. Pearsall and Alexander friends forover 20 years

4. Orange juice

5. Two cups

7. 16/12/1982The first package bought by Pearsall Yes Are you in on it ? Pearsall Alexander A half of price? I has no money Then, Alexander snatched and scratched boths tickets

8. Pearsall snatched the tickets, scratched one and left another one for Alexander 16/12/1982 The second “package” bought by Alexander

9. Alexander Won$20.000 Refused to split

10. DoesPearsallhave a right to half the winnings ? Yes

11. Analyse Offer + Acceptance = Agreement - Intent - Definiteness - Communication - Intent - Exactiveness - Communication meeting of mind valid valid Share fortunes of ticket

12. Precedent Plantiff: Richard Zientara Defendant: Bernice Kaszuba (506 NE2d 1 (IN. 1987) (Sources: www.lotterypost.com )

13. Richard Zientara offered Kaszuba to buy tickets for him She accepted and used money he gave to buy tickets regularly

16. Implication in Vietnam Plantiff: Mr. N. T. T Defendant: Mr. T. T. L (Ba Ria, Ben Tre Province) (Sources: http://www.phapluattp.vn)

17. 10/2006 L. bought 4 tickets T. bought 3 tickets I have to work, hold tickets for me, please Mr.L Mr.T

18. L scratches 7 tickets without T’s permission One of 3 T’s tickets won speacial prize

20. T did not know which ticket the prize came from and received 50 millions

21. 2 months later, T realized then sued L on Ba Tri court and claimed that L had to pay him 50 millionsNo. Give back to me my money ! Mr.T Mr.L

22. Decision Is there any acceptance from T? NO There is no agreement between T and L. Judgment in favor of N. T .T was appropriate

23. Group 13 Acceptances Case 8 – Page 209 Thank for listening !