10. Two key issues
#1
The purpose of the process often
creates a tension between control
and development
#2
It’s a simple process in a complex
world
11. #1 What are you trying to achieve?
1. Direction-
setting and
control
2. Reward and
recognition
3. Resourcing
and promotion
4. Legal/
compliance and
discipline
5. Personal and
professional
development
6. Individual and
organisational
improvement
7. Feedback and
communication
More
corporate
focus -
control
More
personal
focus -
development
12. Trying to do all this in one process
creates tensions
If I admit to having development needs, will you block my
promotion?
If I say I have spare capacity, will I be at risk of redundancy?
If I give you feedback, will you react rationally?
If you set my objectives, can I be sure they reflect what the
organisation needs?
If I set challenging goals, will I be disadvantages when we
come to score progress next year?
https://www.deviantart.com/graha
mgraham/art/One-Ring-294786480
13. The total of all performance-related conversations over the year
The manager/appraisee structured conversation
The written notes
The formal appraisal record
The “we did
it” tickbox
The tickbox challenge
15. A simple process for a complex world?
“Performance targets are really
good if you're measuring what
you want to achieve. [but] if
people work for extrinsic values
you destroy intrinsic motivation”
(Dave Snowden)
https://cognitive-edge.com/videos/cynefin-framework-introduction/
17. Our manifesto
• Think Holistically
• BLA
• The Flow of Work
• Conversation
• Wider than the Appraiser
• Smaller, Faster, Better
18. One size doesn’t fit all : what we find
Workflow-based branching forms, flexible processes
Standard Totara appraisal forms
Light-touch recording of date only
Use Totara learning plan and evidence store
Which of these models best describes your use of Totara for appraisal?
Source: Think Learning client research, 2018
19. Systems do help!
Empowering managers
Improved transparency and reporting
Reduced central admin
Increased calibration and quality
Improved clarity of process
Aligning appraisal and training
How has (Totara) technology helped your appraisal outcomes this year?
Source: Think Learning client research, 2018
20. About King’s
• One of the largest NHS Trusts in the country
• Founded in 1829, international reputation
• 6 main sites across South East London and 20 clinics
• 200,000 inpatients treated each year
• A teaching and research centre of excellence
• Over 12,000 staff
• Huge range of roles, very diverse staff groups
21. What’s working for us in
performance appraisal
• Build on the high uptake/acceptance of LEAP (our Totara platform) – single platform
for all Learning/Performance processes
• Think’s customised “workflow” tool to give us flexibility
• Trust your employees
• Provide different approaches to recording – from very light touch (just date/rating) to
online objectives/development/reviews – all feeding single reporting dashboard
• Treat appraisal as a “compliance topic” – on R/A/G dashboards, manager and staff
reminders, board-level visibility
22. • A Totara process, customised
with Think Learning
• We trust employees to drive
the process (including
selecting their
manager/appraiser)
• Guidance videos, on-screen
support, and training – the
recording system is a very
small part
• Choice of “full record” or
“rapid record“
• Local freedoms (only “must-
do” is annual appraisal date
and rating)
23. Choice of 4-
stage annual
process
“Rapid record”
date and rating
OR
(or mix-and-
match through
the year)
Mobile- and tablet-friendly
responsive design
Balance of flexibility (free
text fields, freedom to write
what’s relevant) and
guidance (focusing on links
to priorities and values)
Employee-driven process
24. What’s next for King’s
• Build further on current 90% appraisal rate
• Add in some (gentle) manager controls/signoffs
• Campaigns to focus on quality as well as quantity of appraisal
• Regular supervision as well as annual checks
• Link to pay progression checks
• Talent management
• Use of workflow tools for other L&D processes (e.g. onboarding)
26. Boundaries Space
A control diagnostic
• Where is your organisation
trying to position appraisal? Is
it in the right place?
• How do you approach
appraisal?
• How does your manager/your
employees expect to
approach appraisal
• What are the gaps between
these positions?
Model developed by BP, based on situational leadership
Direction
Support
28. Five suggestions
• Use the diagnostic
• Engage with your HR colleagues
• Get the business involved
• Push learning data back into the performance cycle
• Look around!
29. • Nick Shackleton-Jones http://www.aconventional.com/
• Dave Snowden https://cognitive-edge.com/
• Julian Stodd https://seasaltlearning.com
• Mike Walsh http://www.mike-walsh.com/
30. True Eureka innovation is not
going to happen by an
internal training programme
but from engagement in the
real world
(Dave Snowden)
Thank you!
Download these slides at xxx
Visit us today on stand L55
Connect with us – www.think-learning.com
Notes de l'éditeur
2 in 10 employees strongly agree that their performance is managed in a way that motivates them
14% of employees strongly agree that performance reviews inspire them to improve
20% of employees think their manager is good at giving feedback (but 80% of managers think they are good at giving feedback…)
26% strongly agree their review rating is accurate
Cost estimates (USA) $960 billion per year due to disengaged staff
In UK healthcare, 22% of staff say their appraisal helped them to improve how they do their job.
29% said their appraisal made them feel their work was valued.
The “one ring to rule them all” problem
Oh sorry no, not that one…
Think holistically. Appraisal is a tool; what other tools do you have, and are you using each appropriately?
Bespoke, localised approach. One size/system will not suit every organisation (or even every employee in one organisation)
Move performance support into the flow of work
De-emphasise the annual review, focus on regular conversations
Go wider then the appraiser. 360/peer feedback in real time, collaborative/social platforms at work
Faster, smaller performance cycles need faster, smaller L&D interventions. (so yes, mobile, bite-sized and personal are key trends)
Move from “performance appraisal and control” to “performance development and engagement”:
Decision
Sets direction and translates business context.
Manages and sets expectations and performance targets.
Incorporates differences between leadership (people) and management (things).
Support
Leaders develop leaders.
Acts for the good of the whole.
Team members have access to reflection, time and resources.
Boundaries
Manages different constituencies – within, between, outside.
Establishes clear boundaries for the individual.
Manages the internal policies and trade-offs.
Space
Creates an environment in which collaboration and challenge can flourish.
Provides time and opportunity for reflection as well as action.
Invites and incorporates diverse points of view.
Diagnostic as discussed on previous slide.
Engage with your HR/organisational development colleagues, help them to build engaging, developmental performance processes and clarify the purpose
Get the business involved – what’s easy (process/technology) for L&D people may be hard for the business. Simplify and trust!
Help to push learning data back into the performance cycle (Kirkpatrick evaluation of learning effectiveness)
Look around the exhibition and challenge suppliers to do more around performance development, not just learning
My thinking has been particularly influenced by these people. Writing down these, I think the common thread is how organisations are trying to respond to the complexity inherent in human relationships