UWM DETA Summit | ELI Annual Meeting 2015
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
0 j'aime•1,738 vues
Summit slides (to be) presented 2.9.15 at the ELI Annual Meeting in Anaheim, CA.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à UWM DETA Summit | ELI Annual Meeting 2015
Similaire à UWM DETA Summit | ELI Annual Meeting 2015 (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
UWM DETA Summit | ELI Annual Meeting 2015
- 1. Welcome! What to do? 1. Find your name tag 2. Locate your table indicated on your name tag 3. Meet your facilitator 4. Pull out your digital device 5. Open the Google Doc for your table located at: http://uwm.edu/deta/summit/docs
- 2. National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) Tanya Joosten, DETA Co-Director and PI, @tjoosten, tjoosten@uwm.edu Laura Pedrick, DETA Advisory Board, lpedrick@uwm.edu Diane Reddy, DETA Co-Director and PI, reddy@uwm.edu slideshare.net/tjoosten uwm.edu/deta/summit #DETASummit
- 4. DETA goals Flicker cc duncan
- 5. Understand and determine distance education outcomes Flicker cc heycoach
- 6. Identify practices (instructional and institutional) that impact those outcomes
- 7. Conduct rigorous, interdisciplinary, and standardized research Flicker cc astronomyblog
- 8. Ensure outcomes for all students, including those with disabilities
- 10. Year 1 goal: Develop research model Outcomes Research questions Framework of inquiry
- 11. Year 1 activity: Host national summit
- 12. Year 2 goal: Collect data
- 13. Year 2 activities: RFP for pilot grant awards Flicker cc yourdon
- 14. Year 2/3 goal: Produce effective use cases Flicker cc yourdon Content •Text •Images •Audio •Video Interactivity •Discussions •Groups •Feedback Assessment •Written and oral examination •Discursive •Portfolio
- 15. Year 2/3 goal: CBE success factors Flicker cc yourdon
- 17. Partners: UW-System, UW-Extension, Milwaukee Area Technical College, EDUCAUSE Year Goals Activities 1-2 Develop National Distance Education and Technology Advancements (DETA) research models for online education 1. Host national summit 2. Determine desired outcomes 3. Establish framework of inquiry 4. Formulate measures 5. Establish research instrumentation 1-2 Implement technology systems for data collection, storage, and retrieval 1. Develop protocols for data collection 2. Implement software for the collection of data 3. Establish guidelines for data storage 4. Develop protocols for data retrieval 5. Implement hardware and software for the storage and retrieval of data 2-3 Collect data by replicating research models at the course, program, and institutional level 1. Produce research toolkits 2. Evaluate pilot grant proposal submissions 3. Engage research fellows in research projects 4. Ensure data collection addresses audiences of interest 2-3 Produce effective use cases for instructional improvement to enhance student learning through identification of success factors 1. Develop blueprints for best practices 2. Tag items for specific audiences 3. Develop rubric for course and program evaluation 2-3 Identify and disseminate success factors for competency-based distance education 1. Conduct research on CBE 2. Develop best practices blueprints for CBE 3 Develop guidelines and a rubric for the diffusion of technological advancements 1. Advance guidelines for technology diffusion 2. Develop technology evaluation rubric 1-3 Include disability in all aspects of the research goals 1. Embed disability specific questions/data fields within research instrumentation 2. Create curricular disability accessibility assessment tools 3. Identify which interventions impact learning for which type of disabilities
- 18. Desired Outcomes Access Learning Effectiveness Instructional Effectiveness Satisfaction
- 19. Today 8:30-9:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 9:15-9:30 Voting and break 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 10:15-10:30 Voting and break 10:30-11:00 Summary and next steps 11:00 END 11:30-12:30 Supplemental sessions
- 20. Questions
- 21. Next steps 8:30-9:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 9:15-9:30 Voting and break 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 10:15-10:30 Voting and break 10:30-11:00 Summary and next steps 11:00 END 11:30-12:30 Supplemental sessions
- 22. Go to: http://uwm.edu/deta/summit/docs OR Go to: http://uwm.edu/deta Click on Summit Click on Collaborative Docs
- 23. Part 1: In understanding student success in distance education, we as a field need to have a consistent understanding of student success across programs and institutions, including identifying shared desired outcomes. In considering this need, what are the research questions that will assist us in identifying key factors impacting these shared desired outcomes to best enhance the understanding of distance education across institutions and populations? Potential Research Questions: Discussion Notes (everyone can contribute):
- 26. Part 2: In consideration of the research questions proposed in enhancing our understanding of the key factors, what variables should be included in the framework of inquiry to help us answer these questions surrounding distance education and technological advancements? Potential Variables: Discussion Notes (everyone can contribute):
- 30. Next steps Formulate measures Develop methods and instrumentation RFP for subgrant awards
- 31. Supplemental sessions Today, 11:30am-12:30pm, Laguna Room 1. Data Acquisition Challenges in Conducting Cross- Institutional Research, Ray Fleming 2. Determining Access in Distance Education, Roger Smith 3. Supporting Students: Issues in Distance Education Research, Simone Conceição and Jonnie Dovorak Tomorrow: Research in Competency-based Education (CBE), Tuesday, 5:15-6:00pm, Laguna Room uwm.edu/DETA/Summit/Docs
- 34. Tanya Joosten, DETA Co-Director and PI, @tjoosten, tjoosten@uwm.edu Laura Pedrick, DETA Advisory Board, lpedrick@uwm.edu Diane Reddy, DETA Co-Director and PI, reddy@uwm.edu
Notes de l'éditeur
- Thanks for coming
- Laura Pedrick to discuss UWM, our history of online, blended, and CBE. Provide a profile, number of online courses, students, programs. Highlight our background and expertise in our campus partners including R2D2, PASS, LTC/CETL, etc.
- Text plus images (Mean study) Rich, current (Web clips, videos, see Ginkgotree study)
- …to identify outcomes and influences on all students. Specifically, we look to examine the effectiveness of education interventions across courses and institutions We would like to follow WWC standards by conducting Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Experimental Designs when possible
- to identify outcomes and influences on all students, including those with disabilities.
- Laura Pedrick to discuss our different partners and why we engaged them for the grant.
- Provide Justification for year 1 goal Discuss each activity for year 1 goal 1. Host national summit 2. Determine desired outcomes 3. Identify research questions to facilitate cross-institutional research 4. Establish framework of inquiry, including common variables Moving forward: 5. Formulate measures 6. Establish research instrumentation and methodology Transition: Now, let’s talk more specifically about our first activity as we are launching this grant.
- Provide details on the summit at the ELI Annual Meeting Where, when, why, who, how…
- Collect data by replicating research models at the course, program, and institutional level Discuss research toolkits produced from year 1 being used by our research fellows, institutional partners, CBEN institutions Diane can further discuss work of research fellows Laura can discuss CBEN data collection plans 1. Produce research toolkits 2. Evaluate pilot grant proposal submissions 3. Engage research fellows in research projects 4. Ensure data collection addresses audiences of interest Dissemination 1. Research toolkits through DETA Community Website and ELI annual conference Transition: let’s discuss a little bit more about our sub-grant awards. This is where other institutions can get involved.
- Call for proposals for pilot grant through DETA Community Website and ELI annual conference Jan/Feb 2015 Evaluate pilot grant proposal submissions Ensure data collection addresses audiences of interest
- Produce effective use cases for instructional improvement to enhance student learning through identification of success factors These guides contain practical recommendations that educators can use to address specific challenges in their courses and programs (WWC) Activities 1. Develop blueprints for best practices 2. Tag items for specific audiences Dissemination 1. Effective practices use cases (accessible multimedia) through DETA Community Website and ELI SEI Website Goal 5: Identify and Disseminate Success Factors for Competency-Based Distance Education 1. Conduct Research on CBE 2. Develop Best Practices Blueprints for CBE Dissemination 1. Best practices use cases (accessible multimedia) through DETA Community Website, ELI Webinar, and ELI SEI Website
- Laura Pedrick Goal 5: Identify and Disseminate Success Factors for Competency-Based Distance Education 1. Conduct Research on CBE 2. Develop Best Practices Blueprints for CBE Dissemination 1. Best practices use cases (accessible multimedia) through DETA Community Website, ELI Webinar, and ELI SEI Website
- Learning and instructional effectiveness -Quality of education meets standards Learning Effectiveness OLC 5 Pillars The provider demonstrates that online learning outcomes meet or exceed institutional, industry, and/or community standards. Faculty perception surveys or sampled interviews compare learning effectiveness in delivery modes. Learner/graduate/employer focus groups or interviews measure learning gains. Faculty report online learning is equivalent or better. Direct assessment of student learning is equivalent or better. Instructional effectiveness as defined by WWC-- Instructional improvement, program effectiveness, administrator effectiveness, curriculum evaluation, educational quality, outcomes of education, instructional media Program level outcomes Institutional level outcomes Achievement Achievement as defined by WWC - success, failure, achievement gains, academic achievement, improvement Success in achieving learning outcomes – USDoE Application for Grants From US DOE grant summary -- learning outcomes, student outcomes, educational outcomes Course level outcomes Access Access – underrepresented, those with disabilities and minorities All learners who wish to learn online can access learning in a wide array of programs & courses Administrative and technical infrastructure provides access to all prospective and enrolled learners. Quality metrics are used for information dissemination; learning resources delivery; and tutoring services. Satisfaction Satisfaction – student and instructor Faculty are pleased with teaching online, citing appreciation and happiness. Students are pleased with their experiences in learning online, including interaction with instructors and peers, learning outcomes that match expectations, services, and orientation. Repeat teaching of online courses by individual faculty indicates approval. Addition of new faculty shows growing endorsement. Metrics show growing satisfaction via: Surveys and/or interviews, Alumni surveys, referrals, testimonials, Outcomes measures, Focus groups, Faculty/Mentor/Advisor perceptions
- If you haven’t done so
- 8:30-9:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 9:15-9:30 Break 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-10:45 Vote: Consensus gathering and prioritization through online polling 10:45-11:00 Summary and next steps
- 9:15-9:30 Vote Break 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities
- 9:15-9:30 Vote and Break 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities
- 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-10:45 Vote: Consensus gathering and prioritization through online polling 10:45-11:00 Summary and next steps
- 9:30-10:15 Idea generation and brainstorming activities 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-10:45 Vote: Consensus gathering and prioritization through online polling 10:45-11:00 Summary and next steps
- 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-10:45 Vote: Consensus gathering and prioritization through online polling 10:45-11:00 Summary and next steps
- 10:30-10:45 Vote: Consensus gathering and prioritization through online polling 10:45-11:00 Summary and next steps
- Today is the tip of the iceberg In the coming month, we will be reviewing the data and information gathered today to help develop a research model that will guide our research in year two of our grant. We will look to engage with key folks to assist in formulate standard measures to help facilitate cross institutional research We will develop methodology, including instrumentation, to assist in the collection and analysis of data We will distribute research tool kits that will provide others the tools they need to conduct research at their own institution at the course or program level. We will announce an RFP for subgrant awards as we look to collaborate with educators and researchers from all over the country in conducting cross institutional research to identify the key factors in distance education that positively influence the desired outcomes.
- Each session will be facilitated by a DETA research fellow or partner Goals of supplemental sessions: Deep dive into topics that are important to the success of the grant. We want to hear from you all about these specialized topics Many of you have valuable experiences to share with us that will assist in making this a successful effort Note: These sessions are held over the lunch hour, so feel free to grab lunch and come join us
- Tuesday, February 10th, 2015 4:15pm California B, Second Floor
- Thanks to all of you for funding your travel to join the DETA partners here at ELI and share your knowledge and expertise in this area to ensure we have a well informed research model moving forward. Thanks to ELI for hosting us at their annual meeting. We greatly appreciate the efforts of their staff in helping us make this event a success. Enjoy the conference.