3. Implementation Monitoring
• an administrative tool which facilitates to improve the decision-making
process of management on regular basis.
• Monitoring is a continuing function that aims primarily to provide the management
and main stakeholders of an ongoing intervention with early indication of progress,
or lack thereof in the achievement of results.
• It accepts the original plan and tracks actual progress against planned projects to
ensure it is within planned time and cost constraints.
4. What is Monitoring……?
-process of keeping track of progress on a continuous and/or periodic basis to
examine whether the inputs and resources meant for the implementation of plans,
policies, programmes and projects are being properly delivered.
-verify whether the project activities are being implemented and whether or not the
intended outputs are being achieved in accordance with the plan.
-The following facts are analysed in the process of monitoring:
1. If the resources are available and used within the limits of an agreed budget and
stipulated timeframe.
2. If the Intended activities are taken and outputs are achieved in a timely and cost-
effective manner.
3. What is the level of implementation capacity of the implementing agencies?
4. What kinds of risks are faced and what remedial measures are taken?
During monitoring, data and information on the above mentioned aspects are
collected, processed and reported in a continuous, systematic, and time-bound
manner. This helps identify problems and initiate corrective measures before it is too
late.
4
5. What is Evaluation
• Evaluation is a systematic and purposeful undertaking carried out by
internal or external evaluators to appraise the relevance, efficiency,
effectiveness of, as well as the impacts and sustainability generated by
the plans, policies, programmes and projects under implementation.
• The main objective of evaluation is to draw lessons from the strengths
and weaknesses experienced so as to improve the design and
implementation in the future as well as to hold the officials and agencies
involved in the process accountable for its implementation and results.
• It focuses on the changes impacted by devilment interventions and
assessed in a few criteria to gather lessons. Therefore, evaluation may
be taken as a tool for learning lesson.
5
The primary difference between monitoring and evaluation is that while monitoring
is a continuous activity, performed at the functional level of project/programme
management, evaluation is a periodic activity, performed at the outcome and impact
level of project activities.
9. 9
Pre-project Phase
• Provide comments on project proposals in :
– PEC, SPEC meeting in the Planning Commission.
– DPEC/DSPEC meetings in the development
ministries
– Internal meeting in the Administrative
Ministries/ Divisions where project proposals are
initially reviewed and examined.
14. An example of Child morbidity
• Inputs: funding, equipments, staffing etc.
• Activities: Media campaign to educate mothers, health personnel trained in
oral rehydration
• Outputs: Increased maternal awareness and access to oral rehydration
therapy services
• Results:
• Outcomes: Improved use of oral rehydration (behavioral change)
• Impacts: Child morbidity reduced
•
21. Baseline issues
1. What are the sources of data?
2. What are the data collection methods?
3. Who will collect the data?
4. How often will the data be collected?
5. What is the cost and difficulty to collect the data?
6. Who will analyze the data?
7. Who will report the data?
8. Who will use the data?
26. 26
Background of IMED
• IMED stands for ‘Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation
Division’
• The Project Implementation Bureau (PIB) was established in 1975
• PIB was under the President’s Secretariat.
• PIB was established to increase the efficiency of project aid
utilization through appropriate monitoring activities.
27. 27
Background of IMED (con.)
• PIB was given the status of a separate
Division in 1977.
• Renamed as ‘Implementation Monitoring and
Evaluation Division (IMED)’ in 1982.
• Finally, IMED was placed under the Ministry
of Planning in 1984.
28. 28
Major Functions of IMED
• Implementation monitoring of all on-going
development projects included in the ADP.
• Prepare periodical progress report and suggestions
for corrections where necessary
• Intensive monitoring for selected projects
• Submission of progress reports to the
Ministries/Divisions, ECNEC meeting etc
29. 29
Major Functions of IMED (con.)
• Evaluation of all completed development projects
• Impact Evaluation for selected completed projects
• Submission of evaluation reports to the
Ministries/Divisions, ECNEC/NEC meeting
30. 30
Different Duties of IMED
Matter relating to the Public Procurement Act & Rules
and Overseeing its implementation
Cost rationalization of projects
Participating PEC meeting
Participating ADP review meeting in ministries
Provide opinion on time extension of projects
Other functions as assigned to the IMED from the
Govt.
31. 31
How IMED Contribute to Development
Work
1. Pre-Implementation Phase: Project
Approval Process
2. Implementation Phase: Implementation
Monitoring
3. Post-Implementation Phase : Evaluation
32. 32
M&E Framework for 8FYP-Role of
IMED
• “..IMED has made some progress in doing systematic review of the entire project
portfolio to distil the key lessons of project selection and management and
strengthen the development impact of the public investment program…”
• The importance of doing a through portfolio analysis of the ADP and find ways
how to maximize the development impact of public investment has gained
momentum in an environment of resource constraint, that has been further
aggravated by the COVID-19.
• IMED will undertake an increased number of impact assessments of projects
with the help of both experimental and non-experimental data so that M&E at the
micro-level moves beyond simply tracking the financial and physical
completion of the projects.
• The IMED will develop its capacity and learning through a process of research
and collaboration with the national think tanks and the universities.”
Exact Quote from Part 1: Chapter 6 - Section 6.3.2 (Page 142)
33. 33
M&E Framework for 8FYP
• In order to monitor the progress of 8FYP, a total of 104 indicators
have been chosen in the Development Result Framework (DRF) of
the 8FYP.
• The 6th Five Year Plan: First introduced the concept of Results-Based
Monitoring and Evaluation (RBM&E) instead of assessing completion of
financial or physical targets as indicators of progress
• DRF of the 8FYP has been elaborated in the Chapter 6 of part 1 and
highlighted
• its strategic role in planning
• the institutional arrangements
• data mobilization arrangements
• mid-term and end evaluation of the plan
• DRF: A total of 15 top priority areas with linked to the SDG and PP2041
• 4 macroeconomic
• 11 Sectoral.
35. Monitoring by IMED
• Monitoring every on-going projects included in
ADP (in house)
• Intensive monitoring for selected projects
(outsourcing)
36. 36
IMED Data Collection Formats
• IMED 01/2003 (Revised):To collect general
information of a project when it is approved/revised
approved.
• IMED 02/2003 (Revised):To collect physical &
financial target on the basis of ADP &
RADP allocation.
• IMED 03/2003 (Revised):To collect information on
quarterly physical & financial progress of project
37. 37
IMED Data Collection Formats
• IMED 04/2003 (Revised):To collect
information of a completed project.
• IMED 05/2003 (Revised):To collect monthly
progress report of a project through review
meetings.
39. 39
How monitoring conducted by IMED
• Collection of information/data through IMED
Formats
• Field inspection/spot verifications of
– priority projects,
– projects targeted for completion,
– aided project and
– sick projects.
40. 40
Monitoring conducted by IMED (con.)
• Participation in monthly ADP Review Meetings and
other Meetings (e.g Steering Committee, PIC,
TEC, Wrap-up etc,)
• Managing Data-base (PMIS) to process and
preserve collected information.
41. 41
Evaluation by IMED
Midterm evaluation – on-going Projects
(selective cases)
Post facto evaluation (for completed project)
– Terminal Evaluation (for all projects)
– Impact Evaluation (for selected projects)
42. 42
Evaluation conducted by IMED (…)
• Prepare Project Completion Report/Terminal
Evaluation Reports on each completed project
highlighting sustainability problems
• Providing recommendations on future course
of actions
• Conduct out-sourced impact evaluation on
selected projects.
43. 43
Outsourcing of Consultants by IMED
• Consulting firms are outsourced very often to conduct
both In-depth monitoring and Impact evaluation of some
technically complex projects.
• Finding are sent to Planning Commission and concerned
project initiating agencies/authorities/ECNEC/NEC
• IMED is conducting 50 In-depth monitoring and 20
Impact evaluation this year through outsourced
consultants.