1. Changing the urban
design paradigm:
Mobility oriented planning
Allison Dutoit
Head of Gehl Studio, Gehl Architects
Architect; BFA, M. Arch
2. Think Mobility
rather
than transit
Gehl Approach
Shifting the
discourse in a
time of scarcity
1. Exemplify
change rather
than lobby for it
(New York City)
3.
What gets
measured gets
done
2.
Consider
Behaviour
4.
A smart city for
people (SF)
20. ….”location close to transit!”
Reduction of CO2 by
locating workplaces
close to transit
stations has 10 times
more effect
than insulating new
buildings from the
normal standard to a
higher level.
”The role of the cities in the climate strategy”
Byernes rolle i klimastrategien, Frederikshavn Kommune, Sønderborg
Kommune, Albertslund Kommune og COWI A/S 2009
21. Reduction of C02 by further
insulation of new buildings
0,08 ton/year/workplace
(From The Danish Building Code
standards to the level below a zero
energy house called “klasse 1”)
”The role of the cities in the climate strategy”
Byernes rolle i klimastrategien, Frederikshavn Kommune, Sønderborg
Kommune, Albertslund Kommune og COWI A/S 2009
22. Reduction of C02 by building close
to transit-stations =10 x larger effect
0,70 ton/year/workplace
(Moving the buildings with in 7-8
minutes walking distance)
”The role of the cities in the climate strategy”
Byernes rolle i klimastrategien, Frederikshavn Kommune, Sønderborg
Kommune, Albertslund Kommune og COWI A/S 2009
23. There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently
what should not be done at all
– Peter Drucker
25. We need both simultaneously
Sustainability is about the
viatality of the planet
tomorrow:
A global issue
Livability is about the
lifestyle of people today:
A local issue
32. PEOPLE ARE NOT IN THE CENTER OF THE
CURRENT PLANNING PROCESS
All cities have
- Traffic departments
-- Data on traffic volumes and needs
-- Prognoses for future traffic volumes
Few cities have
- Departments for pedestrians and public life
- Statistics for the use of public spaces
- Strategies for development of city life culture
34. Two key indicators to help city leaders make wiser
decisions about the city for people
• We count how many are
walking – Movement
• We log what they are
doing when they are
staying in a space Stationary activities
35. Our work is about the interaction between FORM
(buildings and infrastructure) and LIFE
36. Planning for a Liveable City
Not only is new quality criteria required - but also a new planning process
life
space
buildings
37. 5 challenges
3.
Process rather
than product
1. Exemplify
change rather
than lobby for it
(New York City)
3.
What gets
measured gets
done
2.
Consider
Behaviour
4.
A smart city for
people (SF)
38. 1. Exemplfy change rather than lobby for it – Urban prototyping as a way to
ensure effective use of resources, time and money
2. Consider behavior - Measure systems and characteristics of things or
measure people and outcomes (health, happiness, safety). Create design and
policy incentives that foster sustainable behavior
4. What gets measured gets done - What is the efficiency in which mobility,
accessibility to public space and the built environment delivers health and
well-being in the 21st century?
5. A smart city for people - Using technology to augment everyday urban
routines only increases the need for thoughtfully designed streets and public
spaces
39. 1. Exemplify
change rather
than lobby for it
(New York City)
Urban prototyping as a way to ensure effective use
of resources, time and money
54. DOT used in-house staff and resources to deliver the project.
Estimated cost $1.5 million
55.
56. New opportunities to experience the City
Gehl Architects · Urban Quality Consultants · Gl. Kongevej 1, 4.tv · 1610 Copenhagen V · Denmark · www.gehlarchitects.dk
57. Invitations to soak in the atmosphere – Times Square
Gehl Architects · Urban Quality Consultants · Gl. Kongevej 1, 4.tv · 1610 Copenhagen V · Denmark · www.gehlarchitects.dk
58.
59. 40% decrease in pedestrian injuries in Times Square
84% more people are lingering (eg. Reading, eating)
42% of NYC residents shop in Times Square more often
The percentage of area employees satisfied with the Times
Square experience increased by 72% (from 43% to 74% of
those surveyed)
74% of New Yorkers say Times Square has improved
dramatically
60. 11% increase in pedestrian numbers
35% decrease in pedestrian injuries throughout project
17% improvements in travel time
63% decrease in injuries
62. 1. Exemplify
change rather
than lobby for it
(New York City)
Pilot Projects & Rapid Urban Prototyping
1. Should the temporary ever become
permanent? - or should it just evolve with
the fast changing cultural landscape ?
2. How do we shorten the time between
design and implementation of large
infrastructure projects like the CPH metro
(designed in the 90’s built up through
2018)
63. 2.
Consider
Behaviour
Measure systems and characteristics of things
or measure people and outcomes
(health, happiness, safety).
Create design and policy incentives that foster
sustainable behavior
64. By 2030, energy efficiency and behavior change will offset more
CO2 than all the new wind, solar, and other alternative energy
generation methods combined
World Energy Outlook 2009
IEA/OECD
65. Measuring Systems and Things OR measuring People
and Relations
Measuring building focuses on
the sustainability of building
construction….
And doesn’t engage enough in
capitalising on some of the
human behavioral savings .
66. Investing in Sustainable Infrastructure?
Dehli Metro Rail Corporation
1/5 of Projected Use
Projected 2.2 million passengers per day
- Actually 450,000
Ridership
Proposed
Actual
Regular metro riders
are being subsidized
$712 USD/year
Average Income in
India is $510
USD/year
67. Investing in Sustainable Infrastructure?
Metroselskabet
1/2 of Projected Use
Flintholm hub projected at 13,270 but
only 7,500
Ridership
7.3 billion write off
of value of project
Proposed
Actual
Ridership expected
to fall an additional
15-23%
12 billion kr.
Extension under
construction
69. A place more accessible for all
Gehl Architects · Urban Quality Consultants · Gl. Kongevej 1, 4.tv · 1610 Copenhagen V · Denmark · www.gehlarchitects.dk
70.
71. Copenhagen Municipal Vision
Copenhagen has a vision
We will become the world’s most liveable
city: a sustainable city with urban space
inviting people to a unique and varied urban
life. We will become a metropolis for people.
80. Why do Danes cycle?
Is it because of the environment?
5%
state that it is
because of the
environment
Copenhagen Bicycle
Account 2010
Copenhageners cycling
save over 90.000 t
CO2 annually
81. A larger percentage bike for financial reasons ….
15%
state that it is
because it is cheap
Copenhagen Bicycle
Account 2010
82. Even more because cycling is part of a healthy lifestyle ...
17%
state that it is
because of the
exercise
Copenhagen Bicycle
Account 2010
83. But most people bike because it is the most convenient, fast, direct
and pleasurable way to move through the city!
63%
state that it is
because it is
convenient and fast
and most direct
and pleasurable?
Copenhagen Bicycle
Account 2010
84. People don’t change their behavior when you tell them to;
Copenhagen Modal Split
63% of those who bike do so out of convenience
People change when the context compels them to
85. Investment works
København and Amsterdam: Investment per. capita approx. 180
per year, share of trips +30%
Holland: Investment per. capita approx. 180 per year, share of
trips around. 30%
Capital Region: Investment per. capita 82 per year, share of trips
17%
86.
87. 2.
Consider
Behaviour
How can we promote or ’nudge’ people
to align their habits with the needs of
the planet?
•Investing in public transport is only
worthwhile if it people choose to use it.
•A building is only sustainable if it is
part of a sustainable network
•Investment in green technology is only
sustainable if people behave the way
we predict they will
88. 3.
What gets
measured gets
done
What is the efficiency at which mobility,
accessibility to public space, and the built
environment delivers health and well-being in
the 21st century?
98. 3.
What gets
measured gets
done
1. Can we capture the social and
cultural value of investments made
in mobility as well as the economic
and environmental ones
2. Can we create a quality criteria
for mobility based on comfort,
convenience, and quality of
experience
99. 4.
A smart city for
people
Using technology to augment everyday
urban routines only increases the need for
thoughtfully designed streets and public spaces
and networks
118. TRADE-OFFS
A cycletrack reduces conflicts between
vehicles and bicyclists but increases
potential conflicts with commercial and
passenger loading activity, including
accessible services.
A shared bicycle lane retains conflicts with
vehicles and boarding activity but reduces
these with pedestrians.
However, vehicle conflicts would be reduced
with more vehicle restrictions.
121. FINDING PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The RFP just stipulates
•15% improvement in travel time
•50% increase in transit capacity
As success criterias this is incredibly limiting – starts
with the technical problem, rather than a vision that
we work toward achieving.
125. 4.
A smart city for
people
1. How can we invite the people that
work, live, and visit places like Market
Street to meet, linger, collaborate and
share knowledge?
2. What types of physical infrastructure,
urban design and land uses will facilitate
spontaneous or planned interaction?
3. How can smart city technology
augment interaction, collaboration,
mobility,
126. Think Mobility
rather
than transit
Gehl Approach
Shifting the
discourse in a
time of scarcity
1. Exemplify
change rather
than lobby for it
(New York City)
3.
What gets
measured gets
done
2.
Consider
Behaviour
4.
A smart city for
people (SF)