3. 3
Nielsen Case Competition
Executive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis Recommendations
How was the growing situation of Good Flavour
Soya Milk in the first half of 2012?
Key findings:
• Performance review: LOW growth rate in volume share in some
market channel
• Pack Type: Ineffective pack type portfolio
• Unique Selling Proposition: Only features, no clear benefits
Recommendations:
Adopt new pack type Strengthen USP
8. 8
Nielsen Case Competition
Ineffective pack type portfolio
Period Jan – Dec 11
Jan 12 – Jul
12
Traditional
Grocery
5% 4%
Café &
Restaurant
6% 11%
Detailed AnalysisExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Recommendations
USP
Pack
Type
Soya milk – Average Volume growth rate
People prefer using soya milk in restaurant and cafe
to buying those from grocery.
9. 9
Nielsen Case Competition
Consider PLASTIC + GLASS bottle
Café and Restaurant Good Flavour Green
Plastic Bottle
Glass Bottle
Fino Tetra Pack
Carton Pack
4
12
70
14
76
24
27
39
6
28
Detailed AnalysisExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Recommendations
USP
Pack
Type
10. 10
Nielsen Case Competition
“True Soya Flavour” – Only features, no benefits
Green 1 Green 2
Source: Euromonitor 2012
Green – Brand Portfolio
Detailed AnalysisExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Recommendations
USP
Pack
Type
11. 11
Nielsen Case Competition
“True Soya Flavour” – Only features, no benefits
Detailed AnalysisExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Recommendations
USP
Pack
Type Healthy drinks have gained
MORE ATTENTION from consumers
12. 12
Nielsen Case Competition
• USP delivers high-ranking benefits from BUMO
- Has better taste than others
- Good for health
E.g.: Vinasoy
• Design more impressive and strong USP:
RecommendationsExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis
Source: Vinasoy 2013
2010 2011 2012
Vinasoy market share
Strengthen
USP
Adopt
Plastic
Bottle
“True Soya Flavour” “Taste For Health
13. 13
Nielsen Case Competition
4 4
13 12
77
70
6
14
MAT LastYear MAT This Year
Pack type – Volume
Contribution – Café &
Restaurant
Carton Pack Fino Tetra Pack
Glass Bottle Plastic Bottle
JAN11 MAR11 MAY11 JUL11 SEP11 NOV11 JAN12 MAR12 MAY12 JUL12
Carbonated Soft Drink – Pack type
Portfolio
Can Glass Bottle Plastic Bottle
RecommendationsExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis
Reasons:
- Plastic bottle using trend in café & restaurant
- Lower production cost in budget constraint
Strengthen
USP
Adopt
Plastic
Bottle
14. 14
Nielsen Case Competition
4 4
13 12
77
70
6
14
MAT LastYear MAT This Year
Pack type – Volume
Contribution – Café &
Restaurant
Carton Pack Fino Tetra Pack
Glass Bottle Plastic Bottle
JAN11 MAR11 MAY11 JUL11 SEP11 NOV11 JAN12 MAR12 MAY12 JUL12
Energy Drink – Pack type Portfolio
Can Glass Bottle Plastic Bottle
RecommendationsExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis
Reasons:
- Plastic bottle using trend in café & restaurant
- Lower production cost in budget constraint
Strengthen
USP
Adopt
Plastic
Bottle
15. 15
Nielsen Case Competition
RecommendationsExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis
Total fee to invest in RGB producing machine in the first year :
= RGB Producing machine cost + RGB Bottle Producing cost
= 160 Bil VND + 2000VND x 22 mil bottle = 204Bil VND
Total fee to invest in Plastic Bottle producing machine in the first year :
= Plastic Bottle Producing machine cost + Plastic Bottle Producing cost
= 90 Bil VND + 2200VND x 21 mil bottle = 136.2Bil VND
Strengthen
USP
Adopt
Plastic
Bottle
16. 16
Nielsen Case Competition
Reasons:
- Plastic bottle using trend in café & restaurant
- Lower production cost in budget constraint
<
Assuming that the useful life of the machine is 10 years
Total producing cost of:
1 RGB Bottle = [(cost of RGB producing machine/10)/RGB Production
capacity] + cost of producing 1 RGB bottle
= (160 Bil VND/10)/22 mil + 2,000 VND = 2,727.27 VND
1 Plastic Bottle = [(cost of Plastic Bottle producing machine/10)/Plastic Bottle
Production capacity] + cost of producing 1 RGB bottle
= (90 Bil VND/10)/21 mil + 2,200 VND = 2,628.57VND
RecommendationsExecutive Insights
Performance
Review
Detailed Analysis
Strengthen
USP
Adopt
Plastic
Bottle
17. 17
Nielsen Case Competition
References
• Nielsen Vietnam 2013, “The Nielsen Case Competition – 6th Edition -
Preliminary Round Case Study”, Nielsen, viewed 24 September 2013.
• Euromonitor 2012, ‘Soft drinks in Vietnam report’, Euromonitor 2012,
viewed 31 October 2012,<http://www.euromonitor.com/soft-drinks-in-
vietnam/report>
• Ha Noi IEC 2010, Market research report on printing and packaging
industry in Vietnam, viewed 31 October 2012, Ha Noi IEC 2010.
• “Vinasoy Va Chien Luoc Dai Duong Xanh”, doanhnhansaigon.vn, viewed
25 April 2013, <http://www.doanhnhansaigon.vn/online/kinh-
doanh/chuyen-lam-an/2013/04/1073311/vinasoy-va-chien-luoc-dai-
duong-xanh/>
18. Team 5:
Nguyen Huynh Son
Mai Hong Ngoc
Dang Lam Bich Ngoc
Le Ngoc Anh Phuong
Q&A
19. Team 5:
Nguyen Huynh Son
Mai Hong Ngoc
Dang Lam Bich Ngoc
Le Ngoc Anh Phuong
THANK
YOU!
21. 21
Nielsen Case Competition
Environmental Problems:
Healthy
Drinks
Recycled PET
Plastic
Factory
Commitment
Profit :
money, gift, service
PET
plastic
bottle
Profit
from PET
bottle
Provide
data source
of empty
PET Bottle
Provide used PET
data of purchasing
and output of
recycled PET
Bottle
Café
Restaurant