汎用AIに自律性は必要か？
•
0 j'aime•652 vues
This document discusses requirements for developing more generalized and autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems. It notes that while specialized AI systems can only perform pre-defined tasks, more generalized systems would need to be able to learn new tasks and respond to unexpected situations through experience. Truly autonomous systems require goals or purposes to drive planning and behavior. More generalized AI may need meta-goals like appropriately deriving goals or maintaining a balanced mental state. Developing such systems poses challenges like resolving conflicts between goals and setting or changing meta-goals. Designing appropriate meta-goals for generalized AI is also discussed.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à 汎用AIに自律性は必要か？
Similaire à 汎用AIに自律性は必要か？ (20)
Plus de The Whole Brain Architecture Initiative
Plus de The Whole Brain Architecture Initiative (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
汎用AIに自律性は必要か？
- 1. 3 栗原 聡 慶應義塾大学大学院理工学研究科 電気通信大学人工知能先端研究センター(AIX) OMRON SINIC X HONDA R&D Center X
- 2. 1
- 4. Analysis, comparisons and proposals of AI/ML benchmarks and competitions. Lessons learnt. Theoretical or experimental accounts of the space of tasks, abilities and their dependencies. Tasks and methods for evaluating: transfer learning, cognitive growth, development, cumulative learning, structural self-modification and self-programming. Conceptualisations and definitions of generality or abstraction in AI / ML systems. Unified theories for evaluating intelligence and other cognitive abilities, independently of the kind of subject (humans, animals or machines): universal psychometrics. Evaluation of conversational bots, dialogue systems and personal assistants. Evaluation of common sense, reasoning, understanding, causal relations. Evaluation of multi-agent systems in competitive and cooperative scenarios, evaluation of teams, approaches from game theory. Better understanding of the characterisation of task requirements and difficulty (energy, time, trials needed...), beyond algorithmic complexity. Item generation. Item Response Theory (IRT). Evaluation of AI systems using generalised cognitive tests for humans. Computer models taking IQ tests. Psychometric AI. Assessment of replicability, reproducibility and openness in AI / ML systems. Evaluation methods for multiresolutional perception in AI systems and agents. Analysis of progress scenarios, AI progress forecasting, associated risks. •Analysis of requirements for autonomy and generality •Design proposals for cognitive architectures targeting generality and/or autonomy •Complex layered networked systems and architectures •Synergies between AI approaches •Integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches (e.g. logic-based and neural-inspired) •Emergence of (symbolic) logic from neural networks •New programming languages relevant to generality and autonomy •New methodologies relevant to generality and autonomy •New architectural principles relevant to generality and autonomy •Complex (e.g. layered, hierarchical or recursive) network architectures for generality and autonomy •New theoretical insights relevant to generality and autonomy •Motivation (intrinsic, extrinsic) for enabling autonomous behavior selection and learning •Analysis of the potential and limitations of existing approaches •Methods to achieve general ((super)human-like) performance •Methods for epigenetic development •Baby machines and experience-based, continuous, online learning •Seed-based programming and self-programming •Education for systems with general intelligence and high levels of autonomy •Understanding and comprehension •Reasoning and common-sense •Acquisition of causal models •Cumulative knowledge acquisition •Curiosity, emotion and motivation for enabling autonomous behavior and knowledge acquisition •Meta-planning, reflection and self-improvement •Principles of swarm intelligence for generality and autonomy
- 13. 目的同士が競合する場合