SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  35
CHAPTER 11
The Ethics of Punishment
and Corrections
Lecture slides prepared by Lisa J. Taylor
Elements of Punishment
• Two people involved, the punisher and the one being
punished.
• The punisher inflicts harm on the one being punished.
• The punisher is authorized by law to inflict the
punishment.
• The one being punished has been judged to be in
violation of a criminal law.
• The inflicted harm is meted out specifically as
punishment for that violation of criminal law.
Treatment
In correctional terminology, treatment is anything
used to induce behavioral change.
The goals of treatment are:
• elimination of dysfunctional or deviant behavior
• encouragement of productive, normal behavior
Suggested Guidelines
for Punishment
• Protection of individual liberty
• Minimal intrusion in criminals’ lives
• Justification of each intrusion
• Crime should be prevented according to the
requirements of justice
Punishment Rationale
The social contract provides the rationale for
punishment and corrections.
•We avoid social chaos by giving the state the power to
control us.
•The state is limited in the amount of control it can exert
over individuals.
•For consistency with the social contract, the state
should exert its power only to protect.
•Any further interventions with civil liberties are
warranted.
Correctional Goals
1. Retribution
2. Prevention
• Incapacitation
• Deterrence
• Rehabilitation
• Reform
Can treatment and punishment occur simultaneously?
Can a punishment system in which “just” punishment is
relative and changes with time be ethical or moral?
Punishment and
Corrections
Treatment programs created in the last hundred
years assume that offenders’ criminal activity can be
reduced by:
• treating psychological problems such as sociopathic or
paranoid personalities
• addressing social problems such as alcoholism or
addiction
• resolving more practical problems, such as chronic
unemployment, with vocational training and job
placement
Retribution: How Much
Punishment?
Bentham: Criminal offenses deserve punishment that balances the
pleasure or profit of the offense
Neoclassicists: Characteristics of the offender should influence
the punishment decision
In today’s correctional climate:
• Determinate sentencing focuses on the seriousness of the
offense
• Indeterminate sentencing tailors the sentence to the individual
offender
Retributivists: Balance is restored when offenders have suffered
as much as their victims
Punishment
The Justice Model of punishment:
• Promotes a degree of predictability and equality in sentencing
• Reverts to earlier retributive goals of punishment
• Restricts the state’s use of treatment as a release criterion
The Just Deserts Model of punishment:
• Bases punishment on “commensurate deserts”
• Incorporates incapacitation
• Equally punishes offenders who commit similar crimes
Prevention
Assumes that something should be done
to the offender to prevent future criminal
activity
Preventive methods include:
•Deterrence
•Incapacitation
•Treatment
Deterrence
Specific Deterrence:
• Preventing a particular offender from deciding to
commit another offense
• Teaching through punishment
General Deterrence:
• Prevent others in general from deciding to engage
in wrongful behavior
• Teaching by example
Incapacitation
Holding an offender until there is no risk of
further crime.
Because incapacitation is predictive:
• We might release an offender who commits further
crimes.
• We might not release an offender who would not
commit further crimes.
Three Strikes Laws
• Are these laws justified under retribution,
deterrence, or incapacitation?
• Supreme Court holdings of Lockyer v.
Andrade and Ewing v. California.
• Three Strikes Laws are statutes enacted
by states in the U.S that mandates state
courts to impose life sentences on
persons convicted of three or more
serious criminal offenses.
• Usually, only felony crimes qualify as
serious offenses and typically the
defendant is given the possibility of
parole with their life sentence.
• Three Strikes Laws became very popular
in the 1990s.
• Twenty-four states have some form of
habitual offender laws.
• The name comes from baseball, where a
batter is permitted two strikes before
striking out on the third.
Three
Strikes
Laws
Treatment
• Treatment is considered beneficial for both society and the
individual offender.
• The control over the individual is just as great as with
punishment.
• Courts define treatment as “that which constitutes accepted
and standard practice and which could reasonably result in a
‘cure.’”
• Much of the treatment in the correctional environment is either
implicitly or directly coerced.
• No single program works for all offenders.
Ethical Justifications for
Punishment
Utilitarianism: treatment, incapacitation,
deterrence (we punish to benefit the majority)
Ethical formalism: retribution (we punish because
the offender deserves it)
Ethics of care: restorative justice (we punish only
if it is necessary to meet the needs of all
involved)
Punishment
• The American criminal justice system has adopted prison
as a standard form of punishment.
• Imprisonment does not carry the physical pains of flogging
or mutilation.
• Imprisonment is painful because it involves:
o banishment,
o condemnation,
o separation from loved ones,
o deprivation of freedom, and
o an assault on one's self-esteem.
• Prisons are extremely expensive.
• $1.27 billion
o Ohio Department of Corrections
total prison budget
• $1.32 billion
o Total state cost of prisons
• $25,814
o Average annual cost per inmate
Facts
Regarding
Costs
Of
Prisons
in the State
of Ohio
Cruel and Unusual
Punishment
Unusual (by frequency): Punishments that are rarely used
become unusual.
Evolving standards of decency: Punishments acceptable in
the past (flogging) may not be acceptable today.
Shock the conscience: A punishment is cruel and unusual if
it shocks the public conscience.
Excessive or disproportionate: Any punishment that is
disproportionately administered or excessive to its purpose is
considered wrong.
Unnecessary: The purpose of punishment is to deter crime;
only an amount necessary to do so should be administered.
• California is one of several states that
mandate chemical or surgical castration
for repeat sexual offenders before being
released from prison.
• Texas was the first state to offer castration
to repeat offenders on a voluntary basis.
• Repeat offenders in other states, including
Illinois, Ohio and Arkansas, have either
requested or received the surgery as a
way to bargain for a reduced sentence.
• Surgical castration is the most severe and
controversial.
• Not everyone — including leading medical
experts — is even convinced that
castration is effective.
Castration
as a
Deterrent
Thinking
Point
In May of 2010, the US Supreme Court
ruled that sentencing a juvenile to life
imprisonment without parole is
considered cruel and unusual
punishment when the crime is not
murder. Until the Graham v. Florida
ruling, judges around the country could
sentence anyone under the age of 18 to
life in prison for crimes such as
aggravated robbery, rape, and murder.
Did the Supreme Court make the right
decision? Why?
“Shaming” Punishments
Stigmatizing shaming rejects the individual and
may have negative effects.
Reintegrative shaming rejects only the person's
behavior, thus creating a healthier relationship
between the individual and his or her community.
• Daniel Mirales and his wife Eloise stole from a
crime victims fund. She was a 16 year employee
of the District Attorney's office.
• Both Mirales’ must walk back and forth holding a
sign that reads, “I am a thief. I stole $250,000
from the Harris County crime victim's fund."
• They must do this for 5 hours every weekend for
6 years. Additionally, they must spend some
time in jail and/or prison.
• They must post a sign in front of their home that
says, "The occupants of this residence, Daniel
and Eloise Mirales, are convicted thieves."
• They also have to do 400 and 600 hours of
community service: pick up trash, clean graffiti,
or wire homes for Habitat Humanity.
• They also must pay $232K in restitution.
Judge
Imposes Six
Years of
Shaming
Punishment
(2010)
Supermax Prisons
• Prison authorities have long segregated the most
notorious prisoners into special units.
• Today, some states have constructed the most
secure facilities, referred to as supermax prisons.
• Supermax conditions are extremely harsh, including
individual separation of all inmates around the clock
and limited recreational activity.
• Challenges due to conditions, procedures, and who
is sent there (non-violent, mentally ill).
Private Corrections
Private prisons are built by a private
corporation, then leased to the state or
actually run by the corporation, which bills
the state for the service.
What ethical issues do you think arise
with the privatization of prisons?
• A General Accounting Office study found that private and
public institutions cost about the same
• Private corrections tend to pay lower salaries than state
corrections departments
• Officers often transfer to state corrections departments
after they are trained
• Turnover is high in both private and state corrections
Where is incentive to rehabilitate?
Evaluating Private Corrections
Capital Punishment
Public support
1966: 44 percent
late 1990s: 75–80 percent
2008: 63 percent
Who is in favour?
Whites
Fundamentalist Protestants
Politically conservative
Men
Ethical Justifications
RETENTIONISTS
Utilitarianism: deterrence
Ethical formalism: proportional harm
Religion: “an eye for an eye”
Capital Punishment
Does failure to apply capital punishment
fairly invalidate its use?
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against
executing:
• the mentally ill
• the mentally handicapped
• juveniles (under 18)
• “Fast track” death appeals (OK)
• Lethal injection (OK)
• Execution for rapists (Not OK)
Recent Challenges
Community Corrections
• Most offenders are under some form of
community supervision (probation or parole,
halfway houses, work release centers,
intermediate sanctions, or community-based
correctional facilities (CBCF’s).
• Community supervision poses different ethical
challenges than institutional corrections.
Common across all ethics codes:
• Integrity
• Respect for and protection of individual rights
• Service to the public
• Importance and sanctity of the law
• Prohibition against exploiting professional authority
for personal gain
Formal Ethics for
Correctional Professionals
Correctional Officer
Subculture
• May consider inmates, superiors, and society in
general as “the enemy.”
• Accepts use of force as a routine job element.
• Shows a tendency to redefine job roles to meet
minimum requirements only.
• Shows a willingness to use deceit to cover up
wrongdoing by staff.
• Male guards at an Alabama women's
prison have allegedly engaged in the
widespread sexual abuse of female
inmates for years.
• The Justice Department was asked to
investigate alleged incidents occurring
between 2009 and 2011 at the Tutwiler
Prison for Women in Wetumpka,
Alabama.
• Joe A. Martinez, 48, was indicted by a
federal grand jury and accused of
sexually abusing two female inmates
in 2008 and 2010 at the Federal
Correctional Institution in Phoenix,
Arizona.
Allegations
of Sexual
Abuse by
Correctional
Officers
(2012)
• Cynicism towards clients.
• Lethargy from heavy caseloads and
poor pay.
• Individualism: an officer running his/her
caseload in the manner he/she sees fit.
Subcultural Norms

Contenu connexe

Tendances

4.9 post sentencing considerations
4.9 post sentencing considerations4.9 post sentencing considerations
4.9 post sentencing considerations
Alisa Stephens
 
Deductive reasoning and irac
Deductive reasoning and iracDeductive reasoning and irac
Deductive reasoning and irac
kdouat
 

Tendances (20)

Corrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 pptCorrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 ppt
 
Law of Tort : Psychiatric Illness in Malaysia
Law of Tort : Psychiatric Illness in MalaysiaLaw of Tort : Psychiatric Illness in Malaysia
Law of Tort : Psychiatric Illness in Malaysia
 
Tort remedies
Tort remediesTort remedies
Tort remedies
 
criminal law - "Actus non facit reum nisi men sit rea"
criminal law - "Actus non facit reum nisi men sit rea"criminal law - "Actus non facit reum nisi men sit rea"
criminal law - "Actus non facit reum nisi men sit rea"
 
COMUNICADO 998-2022.pdf
COMUNICADO 998-2022.pdfCOMUNICADO 998-2022.pdf
COMUNICADO 998-2022.pdf
 
modrenization of Prison in india
modrenization of Prison in india modrenization of Prison in india
modrenization of Prison in india
 
4.9 post sentencing considerations
4.9 post sentencing considerations4.9 post sentencing considerations
4.9 post sentencing considerations
 
state responsibility
state responsibilitystate responsibility
state responsibility
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
Deductive reasoning and irac
Deductive reasoning and iracDeductive reasoning and irac
Deductive reasoning and irac
 
3 The Court System
3 The Court System3 The Court System
3 The Court System
 
Imperative theory of law
Imperative theory of lawImperative theory of law
Imperative theory of law
 
Writing Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - MemorandumWriting Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - Memorandum
 
Chapter 5
Chapter 5Chapter 5
Chapter 5
 
Admin law presentation on test of bias
Admin law presentation on test of bias Admin law presentation on test of bias
Admin law presentation on test of bias
 
law & morality
law & morality  law & morality
law & morality
 
Indefeasibility of Title
Indefeasibility of Title Indefeasibility of Title
Indefeasibility of Title
 
COMUNICADO 408-2023
COMUNICADO 408-2023COMUNICADO 408-2023
COMUNICADO 408-2023
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
 
Adjudication of claims oxxi- cpc
Adjudication of claims  oxxi- cpcAdjudication of claims  oxxi- cpc
Adjudication of claims oxxi- cpc
 

Similaire à Pollock ethics 8e_ch11

Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
Pollock ethics 8e_ch13Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
windleh
 
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb bg gv v ddbg
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb                           bg gv v ddbgIndianLawsdfbddfbdb                           bg gv v ddbg
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb bg gv v ddbg
cisewe4947
 
CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
 CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
MargaritoWhitt221
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
windleh
 
Spengler chap07
Spengler chap07Spengler chap07
Spengler chap07
medinajg
 
Deviance and social control lecture notes
Deviance and social control lecture notesDeviance and social control lecture notes
Deviance and social control lecture notes
MrAguiar
 

Similaire à Pollock ethics 8e_ch11 (20)

Sexual Offences against Children and Sentencing Principles and Policies
Sexual Offences against Children and Sentencing Principles and PoliciesSexual Offences against Children and Sentencing Principles and Policies
Sexual Offences against Children and Sentencing Principles and Policies
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
Pollock ethics 8e_ch13Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
Pollock ethics 8e_ch13
 
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb bg gv v ddbg
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb                           bg gv v ddbgIndianLawsdfbddfbdb                           bg gv v ddbg
IndianLawsdfbddfbdb bg gv v ddbg
 
Laws of crime
Laws of crimeLaws of crime
Laws of crime
 
The Criminal Justice System for Dummies
The Criminal Justice System for DummiesThe Criminal Justice System for Dummies
The Criminal Justice System for Dummies
 
Chapter 13
Chapter 13Chapter 13
Chapter 13
 
Chapter12
Chapter12Chapter12
Chapter12
 
CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
 CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
CHAPTER 12Discretion and Dilemmas in Corrections
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
Pollock ethics 8e_ch03
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
Pollock ethics 8e_ch08
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
 
Role of Correctional Institutes.pptx
Role of Correctional Institutes.pptxRole of Correctional Institutes.pptx
Role of Correctional Institutes.pptx
 
Chapter 8
Chapter 8Chapter 8
Chapter 8
 
Why punish crime? Justify the theories of punishment.
Why punish crime? Justify the theories of punishment.Why punish crime? Justify the theories of punishment.
Why punish crime? Justify the theories of punishment.
 
Health Policy
Health PolicyHealth Policy
Health Policy
 
Spengler chap07
Spengler chap07Spengler chap07
Spengler chap07
 
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics  Concepts & Cases
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases .Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
 
Theories of Punishment
Theories of PunishmentTheories of Punishment
Theories of Punishment
 
Deviance and social control lecture notes
Deviance and social control lecture notesDeviance and social control lecture notes
Deviance and social control lecture notes
 
Criminology and Victimology.pdf(forensic science)
Criminology and Victimology.pdf(forensic science)Criminology and Victimology.pdf(forensic science)
Criminology and Victimology.pdf(forensic science)
 

Plus de windleh

Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
Pollock ethics 8e_ch12Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
windleh
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
windleh
 
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
windleh
 
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
windleh
 
What to expect in LIB111
What to expect in LIB111What to expect in LIB111
What to expect in LIB111
windleh
 
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numberedAtlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
windleh
 

Plus de windleh (20)

E portfolio
E portfolioE portfolio
E portfolio
 
Blended Learning
Blended LearningBlended Learning
Blended Learning
 
Intentional Course Design for Blended Learning
Intentional Course Design for Blended LearningIntentional Course Design for Blended Learning
Intentional Course Design for Blended Learning
 
Blackboard Migration SUNY Ulster
Blackboard Migration SUNY UlsterBlackboard Migration SUNY Ulster
Blackboard Migration SUNY Ulster
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
Pollock ethics 8e_ch12Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
Pollock ethics 8e_ch12
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
Pollock ethics 8e_ch09
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
Pollock ethics 8e_ch07
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
Pollock ethics 8e_ch06
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
Pollock ethics 8e_ch04
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
Pollock ethics 8e_ch01
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
Pollock ethics 8e_ch02
 
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2 Part 1
 
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
Seminar on Teaching and Learning: Session 2
 
What to expect in LIB111
What to expect in LIB111What to expect in LIB111
What to expect in LIB111
 
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numberedAtlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
Atlanta presentation coil_rc_vm_hw_numbered
 
Student kiosks in the library – guided autonomy
Student kiosks in the library – guided autonomyStudent kiosks in the library – guided autonomy
Student kiosks in the library – guided autonomy
 
Marketing learning center resources at the brc
Marketing learning center resources at the brcMarketing learning center resources at the brc
Marketing learning center resources at the brc
 
Using clickers to improve student understanding
Using clickers to improve student understandingUsing clickers to improve student understanding
Using clickers to improve student understanding
 
EHU + SUNY Ulster online collaboration
EHU + SUNY Ulster online collaborationEHU + SUNY Ulster online collaboration
EHU + SUNY Ulster online collaboration
 

Pollock ethics 8e_ch11

  • 1. CHAPTER 11 The Ethics of Punishment and Corrections Lecture slides prepared by Lisa J. Taylor
  • 2. Elements of Punishment • Two people involved, the punisher and the one being punished. • The punisher inflicts harm on the one being punished. • The punisher is authorized by law to inflict the punishment. • The one being punished has been judged to be in violation of a criminal law. • The inflicted harm is meted out specifically as punishment for that violation of criminal law.
  • 3. Treatment In correctional terminology, treatment is anything used to induce behavioral change. The goals of treatment are: • elimination of dysfunctional or deviant behavior • encouragement of productive, normal behavior
  • 4. Suggested Guidelines for Punishment • Protection of individual liberty • Minimal intrusion in criminals’ lives • Justification of each intrusion • Crime should be prevented according to the requirements of justice
  • 5. Punishment Rationale The social contract provides the rationale for punishment and corrections. •We avoid social chaos by giving the state the power to control us. •The state is limited in the amount of control it can exert over individuals. •For consistency with the social contract, the state should exert its power only to protect. •Any further interventions with civil liberties are warranted.
  • 6. Correctional Goals 1. Retribution 2. Prevention • Incapacitation • Deterrence • Rehabilitation • Reform Can treatment and punishment occur simultaneously? Can a punishment system in which “just” punishment is relative and changes with time be ethical or moral?
  • 7. Punishment and Corrections Treatment programs created in the last hundred years assume that offenders’ criminal activity can be reduced by: • treating psychological problems such as sociopathic or paranoid personalities • addressing social problems such as alcoholism or addiction • resolving more practical problems, such as chronic unemployment, with vocational training and job placement
  • 8. Retribution: How Much Punishment? Bentham: Criminal offenses deserve punishment that balances the pleasure or profit of the offense Neoclassicists: Characteristics of the offender should influence the punishment decision In today’s correctional climate: • Determinate sentencing focuses on the seriousness of the offense • Indeterminate sentencing tailors the sentence to the individual offender Retributivists: Balance is restored when offenders have suffered as much as their victims
  • 9. Punishment The Justice Model of punishment: • Promotes a degree of predictability and equality in sentencing • Reverts to earlier retributive goals of punishment • Restricts the state’s use of treatment as a release criterion The Just Deserts Model of punishment: • Bases punishment on “commensurate deserts” • Incorporates incapacitation • Equally punishes offenders who commit similar crimes
  • 10. Prevention Assumes that something should be done to the offender to prevent future criminal activity Preventive methods include: •Deterrence •Incapacitation •Treatment
  • 11. Deterrence Specific Deterrence: • Preventing a particular offender from deciding to commit another offense • Teaching through punishment General Deterrence: • Prevent others in general from deciding to engage in wrongful behavior • Teaching by example
  • 12. Incapacitation Holding an offender until there is no risk of further crime. Because incapacitation is predictive: • We might release an offender who commits further crimes. • We might not release an offender who would not commit further crimes.
  • 13. Three Strikes Laws • Are these laws justified under retribution, deterrence, or incapacitation? • Supreme Court holdings of Lockyer v. Andrade and Ewing v. California.
  • 14. • Three Strikes Laws are statutes enacted by states in the U.S that mandates state courts to impose life sentences on persons convicted of three or more serious criminal offenses. • Usually, only felony crimes qualify as serious offenses and typically the defendant is given the possibility of parole with their life sentence. • Three Strikes Laws became very popular in the 1990s. • Twenty-four states have some form of habitual offender laws. • The name comes from baseball, where a batter is permitted two strikes before striking out on the third. Three Strikes Laws
  • 15. Treatment • Treatment is considered beneficial for both society and the individual offender. • The control over the individual is just as great as with punishment. • Courts define treatment as “that which constitutes accepted and standard practice and which could reasonably result in a ‘cure.’” • Much of the treatment in the correctional environment is either implicitly or directly coerced. • No single program works for all offenders.
  • 16. Ethical Justifications for Punishment Utilitarianism: treatment, incapacitation, deterrence (we punish to benefit the majority) Ethical formalism: retribution (we punish because the offender deserves it) Ethics of care: restorative justice (we punish only if it is necessary to meet the needs of all involved)
  • 17. Punishment • The American criminal justice system has adopted prison as a standard form of punishment. • Imprisonment does not carry the physical pains of flogging or mutilation. • Imprisonment is painful because it involves: o banishment, o condemnation, o separation from loved ones, o deprivation of freedom, and o an assault on one's self-esteem. • Prisons are extremely expensive.
  • 18. • $1.27 billion o Ohio Department of Corrections total prison budget • $1.32 billion o Total state cost of prisons • $25,814 o Average annual cost per inmate Facts Regarding Costs Of Prisons in the State of Ohio
  • 19. Cruel and Unusual Punishment Unusual (by frequency): Punishments that are rarely used become unusual. Evolving standards of decency: Punishments acceptable in the past (flogging) may not be acceptable today. Shock the conscience: A punishment is cruel and unusual if it shocks the public conscience. Excessive or disproportionate: Any punishment that is disproportionately administered or excessive to its purpose is considered wrong. Unnecessary: The purpose of punishment is to deter crime; only an amount necessary to do so should be administered.
  • 20. • California is one of several states that mandate chemical or surgical castration for repeat sexual offenders before being released from prison. • Texas was the first state to offer castration to repeat offenders on a voluntary basis. • Repeat offenders in other states, including Illinois, Ohio and Arkansas, have either requested or received the surgery as a way to bargain for a reduced sentence. • Surgical castration is the most severe and controversial. • Not everyone — including leading medical experts — is even convinced that castration is effective. Castration as a Deterrent
  • 21. Thinking Point In May of 2010, the US Supreme Court ruled that sentencing a juvenile to life imprisonment without parole is considered cruel and unusual punishment when the crime is not murder. Until the Graham v. Florida ruling, judges around the country could sentence anyone under the age of 18 to life in prison for crimes such as aggravated robbery, rape, and murder. Did the Supreme Court make the right decision? Why?
  • 22. “Shaming” Punishments Stigmatizing shaming rejects the individual and may have negative effects. Reintegrative shaming rejects only the person's behavior, thus creating a healthier relationship between the individual and his or her community.
  • 23. • Daniel Mirales and his wife Eloise stole from a crime victims fund. She was a 16 year employee of the District Attorney's office. • Both Mirales’ must walk back and forth holding a sign that reads, “I am a thief. I stole $250,000 from the Harris County crime victim's fund." • They must do this for 5 hours every weekend for 6 years. Additionally, they must spend some time in jail and/or prison. • They must post a sign in front of their home that says, "The occupants of this residence, Daniel and Eloise Mirales, are convicted thieves." • They also have to do 400 and 600 hours of community service: pick up trash, clean graffiti, or wire homes for Habitat Humanity. • They also must pay $232K in restitution. Judge Imposes Six Years of Shaming Punishment (2010)
  • 24. Supermax Prisons • Prison authorities have long segregated the most notorious prisoners into special units. • Today, some states have constructed the most secure facilities, referred to as supermax prisons. • Supermax conditions are extremely harsh, including individual separation of all inmates around the clock and limited recreational activity. • Challenges due to conditions, procedures, and who is sent there (non-violent, mentally ill).
  • 25. Private Corrections Private prisons are built by a private corporation, then leased to the state or actually run by the corporation, which bills the state for the service. What ethical issues do you think arise with the privatization of prisons?
  • 26. • A General Accounting Office study found that private and public institutions cost about the same • Private corrections tend to pay lower salaries than state corrections departments • Officers often transfer to state corrections departments after they are trained • Turnover is high in both private and state corrections Where is incentive to rehabilitate? Evaluating Private Corrections
  • 27. Capital Punishment Public support 1966: 44 percent late 1990s: 75–80 percent 2008: 63 percent Who is in favour? Whites Fundamentalist Protestants Politically conservative Men
  • 28. Ethical Justifications RETENTIONISTS Utilitarianism: deterrence Ethical formalism: proportional harm Religion: “an eye for an eye”
  • 29. Capital Punishment Does failure to apply capital punishment fairly invalidate its use? The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against executing: • the mentally ill • the mentally handicapped • juveniles (under 18)
  • 30. • “Fast track” death appeals (OK) • Lethal injection (OK) • Execution for rapists (Not OK) Recent Challenges
  • 31. Community Corrections • Most offenders are under some form of community supervision (probation or parole, halfway houses, work release centers, intermediate sanctions, or community-based correctional facilities (CBCF’s). • Community supervision poses different ethical challenges than institutional corrections.
  • 32. Common across all ethics codes: • Integrity • Respect for and protection of individual rights • Service to the public • Importance and sanctity of the law • Prohibition against exploiting professional authority for personal gain Formal Ethics for Correctional Professionals
  • 33. Correctional Officer Subculture • May consider inmates, superiors, and society in general as “the enemy.” • Accepts use of force as a routine job element. • Shows a tendency to redefine job roles to meet minimum requirements only. • Shows a willingness to use deceit to cover up wrongdoing by staff.
  • 34. • Male guards at an Alabama women's prison have allegedly engaged in the widespread sexual abuse of female inmates for years. • The Justice Department was asked to investigate alleged incidents occurring between 2009 and 2011 at the Tutwiler Prison for Women in Wetumpka, Alabama. • Joe A. Martinez, 48, was indicted by a federal grand jury and accused of sexually abusing two female inmates in 2008 and 2010 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Phoenix, Arizona. Allegations of Sexual Abuse by Correctional Officers (2012)
  • 35. • Cynicism towards clients. • Lethargy from heavy caseloads and poor pay. • Individualism: an officer running his/her caseload in the manner he/she sees fit. Subcultural Norms

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Read article - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/magazine/23strikes-t.html?pagewanted=all Class discussion - Do you believe the 3-Strikes Laws work? Are they truly a deterrent? What have been the fiscal effects in states with 3-Strikes laws? California? Which political party is generally a proponent of 3-strikes legislation?
  2. See fact sheet - http://www.vera.org/files/price-of-prisons-ohio-fact-sheet.pdf In 2008, federal, state, and local governments in the U.S. spent nearly $75 billion on corrections, with the large majority on incarceration - http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/incarceration-2010-06.pdf Class discussion – are there more effective and less costly ways to rehabilitate individuals? Community corrections? Programming? Education?
  3. Read article - http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93947&page=1 Class discussion – Is castration cruel and unusual punishment? Should castration even be offered to secure an early release from prison? Are sexual crimes generally about sexual pleasure? What about power?
  4. Read associated article - http://www.talkleft.com/story/2010/10/11/05747/100 This is all part of a sentence to probation. If they violate the terms of the punishment, they face ten years in prison. Compare the following two articles and discuss whether the class feels that shaming is an effective punishment: http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1552&context=wmlr&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3Dshaming%2520punishments%2520in%2520the%2520criminal%2520justice%2520system%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D4%26sqi%3D2%26ved%3D0CDQQFjAD%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fscholarship.law.wm.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1552%2526context%253Dwmlr%26ei%3DJps2UNCqC6qA6QGq_oDIBg%26usg%3DAFQjCNGscxX2yVAVk2avWRdeGvuA3aAvjQ#search=%22shaming%20punishments%20criminal%20justice%20system%22 And http://www.epinions.com/content_2905317508
  5. Class discussion – Is there an argument that in terms of private correctional employees, that “we will get what we pay for?
  6. Read articles - http://articles.cnn.com/2012-05-22/justice/justice_alabama-prison-complaint_1_sexual-assault-prison-guard-tutwiler-prison?_s=PM:JUSTICE and http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Valley%20&%20State/2012-06-21-PNI0621met-guard-indictPNIBrd_ST_U.htm Class discussion - If an inmate believes sexual relations with a guard is consensual, can it ever be considered so in terms of the law? Why do employee/inmate relationships continue to develop?