![CA NetQoS 소개 어플리케이션 인지 가능한 지능형 네트워크 성능 관리 ,[object Object],정성엽 부장 Sr. Consultant) 한국 CA 테크놀로지스](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/20111028ca-111028025645-phpapp02/85/Talk-IT_CA_-_111028-1-320.jpg)
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Talk IT_CA_정성엽_111028
Similaire à Talk IT_CA_정성엽_111028 (20)
Plus de Cana Ko
Plus de Cana Ko (20)
Talk IT_CA_정성엽_111028
- 2. IT 인프라 관리의 당면 과제 변경에 대한 위험요소 최소화 네트웍 , 서버 및 어플리케이션 성능 검증 인프라 관련 비용 최소화 성능 문제를 보다 신속하게 해결 보다 유용한 정보를 기반으로 한 합리적 의사결정 일관성 있는 어플리케이션 성능
- 8. CA NetQoS 기반 성능 모니터링 아키텍쳐 예시 Web Servers App Servers ADA Multiport Collector ADA Master Console ReporterAnalyzer Netflow or sFlow or jFlow NetQoS Performance Center SPAN Port or TAP DB Servers Load Balancer WAN User NetVoyant SNMP Monitoring
- 11. 어플리케이션 성능 측정 개념 응답 시간 상세 파악 HTTP GET index.html (Data Request A) Data Response A1 ACK Response A1 Data Response A2 ACK Response A2 HTTP GET nav.html (Data Request B) Data Response B1 ACK Response B1 Data Response B2 ACK Response B2 No Response No Response Data Response B1 Data Response B1 Server Response Time Network Roundtrip Time Retransmission Delay Data Transfer Time Total Transaction Time ADA Collector
- 25. NetQoS 고객 총 1,000 여 고객사 Financial Services Healthcare Retail Technology Service Providers & Integrators Manufacturing Energy Government “ Once again, the favorability ratings reported by NetQoS customers are among the highest ever seen by First Market Research” - First Market Research (2007)
- 26. 업계 평가 Application-Aware Network Performance Management Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) Radar™ for Application-Aware Network Performance Management Q3 2010, Jim Frey, Research Director, July 28, 2010
- 29. 감사합니다 .
Notes de l'éditeur
- CA Application Performance Management Overview Copyright (C) 2010 CA. All rights reserved.
- SuperAgent QuickStart Student Handout Response Time Insight When a transaction flows across your infrastructure, it essentially flows through three main components of your infrastructure – the network, the server and the application. When performance degrades on any of these components it can in turn adversely affect the transaction times to the end users and this insight is what SuperAgent offers you. You can now easily see in this stacked graph that shows the total response time, which component of your infrastructure is causing the delay and this enables you to quickly point out which group needs to work on improving performance. So how do we define each of these components, lets start with server response time. It is the amount of time it takes for a server to respond to a request Click 2: Data Transfer Time: It is the amount of time it takes the servers to send all the requested data Click 3: Network Round Trip Time: It is the amount of time it takes for a packet to traverse the network. Click 4: These add up to the Total Transaction Time. Next slide: Base Lining Behavior Now that you understand how we can use response time to understand performance of an application, let’s look at how we base line this information to understand performance.
- May 16, 2010 [Presentation Name via Insert tab > Header & Footer] Copyright © 2010 CA
- [ Sources ] (1) Gartner Inc., “Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring”, February 18, 2010 (2) EMA, “Radar for Business Service Management; Service Impact Q3 2010 CA Vendor Profile”, June 2010 (3) Network Computing, “Top 10 Enterprise Management Tools”, March 3, 2008 (4),(3) Bloor Research, “InComparison: Network and Voice Management Software”, February 2008 (5) IDC, “IT Economics: CA Infrastructure Management Reduces Operational Costs and Increases IT Efficiency”, 2009 (6),(5) IDC, “IT Economics, Gaining Business Value with CA’s Enterprise IT Management Software: An ROI Study”, 2008 (7) IDC, “Achieving Business Value & Gaining ROI with CA’s EITM Software”, 2007 (8) ”Evaluating CA Network Management Solutions to Replace HP OpenView”, CA World 2008 CA Application Performance Management Overview Copyright (C) 2010 CA. All rights reserved.
- [ Sources ] (1) Gartner Inc., “Magic Quadrant for Application Performance Monitoring”, February 18, 2010 (2) EMA, “Radar for Business Service Management; Service Impact Q3 2010 CA Vendor Profile”, June 2010 (3) Network Computing, “Top 10 Enterprise Management Tools”, March 3, 2008 (4),(3) Bloor Research, “InComparison: Network and Voice Management Software”, February 2008 (5) IDC, “IT Economics: CA Infrastructure Management Reduces Operational Costs and Increases IT Efficiency”, 2009 (6),(5) IDC, “IT Economics, Gaining Business Value with CA’s Enterprise IT Management Software: An ROI Study”, 2008 (7) IDC, “Achieving Business Value & Gaining ROI with CA’s EITM Software”, 2007 (8) ”Evaluating CA Network Management Solutions to Replace HP OpenView”, CA World 2008 CA Application Performance Management Overview Copyright (C) 2010 CA. All rights reserved.
- May 16, 2010 [Presentation Name via Insert tab > Header & Footer] Copyright © 2010 CA