Chapter 3 of a university course in media history by Prof. Bill Kovarik, based on the book Revolutions in Communication: Media History from Gutenberg to the Digital Age (Bloomsbury, 2nd ed., 2015).
1. Media History from
Gutenberg
to the Digital Age
Slides based on the Bloomsbury book by Bill Kovarik
Revolutions in
Communication
Chapter 3 – The press and the 20th century -- #7
2. Web site & textbook
Textbook:
1st edition – 2011 2nd edition – 2016
http://www.revolutionsincommunication.com
3. Press in transition
Early 20th century
◦ Publishers at the top of their games
◦ Technology mature, profits high
◦ Most towns had two papers
1970s – technology driven mergers
◦ Monopoly newspaper takes over
2000s – digital revolution
◦ Most newspapers in deep financial trouble
◦ Democratic experiment also in trouble
4. Overview
Muckraking press
World War I press
Russian Communist revolution
Indian non-violent revolution
German Nazi revolution
World War II press
Civil Rights era
Vietnam and Watergate era
Literary & Gonzo journalism
Environmental journalism
End game for the printing revolution
5. State of the press 1911
• Will Irwin series Colliers Magazine
• The press is “wonderfully able… (but)
with real faults.”
• “It is the mouthpiece of an older stock. It
lags behind the thought of its times. . .
• “To us of this younger generation, our
daily press is speaking, for the most part,
with a dead voice, because the supreme
power resides in men of that older
generation.”
• Blamed Associated Press monopoly
A familiar
complaint
Will Irwin’s ideas
about newspapers
are similar to
those of many
young writers
today.
6. Muckrakers
• Speech by Teddy Roosevelt April 14, 1906
• Seen as an attack on investigative press
• Cites John Bunyan, Pilgrim’s Progress (1678)
• Man with the Muck Rake
• He “fixes his eyes … only on that which is vile and
debasing…”
• “At this moment we are passing through a
period of great unrest-social, political, and
industrial unrest.
• “It is of the utmost importance for our future
that this should prove to be not the unrest of
mere rebelliousness against life, of mere
dissatisfaction with the inevitable inequality of
conditions, but the unrest of a resolute and
eager ambition to secure the betterment of the
individual and the nation.
• Many journalists embraced the term
7. Who were the muckrakers?
• Ida B. Wells Baker-Barnett (1862–
1931)
• An African American editor of Free
Speech newspaper in Memphis,
TN,
• Investigated the 1891 lynching of
three innocent men at the hands
of a white mob.
• Newspaper was burned down –
fled to New York
• Became one of the most influential
leaders in the early civil rights
movement.
8. Who were the muckrakers?
Lincoln Steffens (1866–1936)
Noted for “The Shame of the Cities”
1904 series on municipal corruption for
McClure’s Magazine.
Upton Sinclair (1878–1968)
“The Jungle,” a 1906 novel about the
meat packing industry of Chicago
Based on investigations by Sinclair for
the Socialist magazine Appeal to
Reason.
Public uproar led to the establishment
of the Food and Drug Administration.
9. Who were the muckrakers?
Ida Tarbell (1857–1944)
Exposed Standard Oil company’s
rise to monopoly by corrupt
business practices In a 1902
series in McClure’s Magazine.
Encouraged antitrust law
enforcementOther muckrakers:
David Graham Phillips (1867–1911)—In “Treason
of the Senate,” a 1906 series in Cosmopolitan exposed
senators who had taken direct bribes
Cecil Chesterton (1879–1918)— London’s New
Witness, exposed stock fraud in the Marconi Scandal of
1912. French Le Matin also investigated.
Samuel Hopkins Adams (1871–1958)— “The
Great American Fraud,” Collier’s Magazine in 1905,
exposed patent medicine. (See Ch. 6 Advertising)
11. WWI and the press 1914 - Belgium
Outside the station in the public
square, the people of Louvain
(Belgium) passed in an unending
procession, women bareheaded,
weeping, men carrying the children
asleep on their shoulders, all
hemmed in by the shadowy army of
gray wolves . . . It was all like a
scene upon the stage, unreal,
inhuman. You felt it could not be
true…
Richard Harding Davis, 1914
12. WWI and the press 1914 -
Belgium
Allegations by British of German
atrocities 1,200 refugees (not under
oath) and no corroboration. Not one
allegation later found true by a Belgian
commission 1922.
Bryce Commission report May 12, 1915
◦ “That there were in many parts of Belgium
deliberate and systematically organized
massacres of the civil population,
accompanied by many isolated murders and
other outrages."
◦ “That in the conduct of the war generally
innocent civilians, both men and women,
were murdered in large numbers, women
violated, and children murdered.”
13. German response
German authorities in response to the
Bryce Report published the White
Book five days later. The book
contained records where Belgians
were guilty of atrocities committed on
German soldiers.
Kolnische Zeitung – This new official
collection of despicable lies is
intended to whip up people to join the
army, improve England’s wretched
military situation…
14. Phillip Gibbs, British
correspondent
Doubtless there were many atrocities,
but I could never get evidence of any
of them… No living babies had their
hands cut off, or women their breasts.
No Canadians (soldiers) were ever
crucified, although it will be believed
for all time.”
20. WWI and the press
Censorship official on both sides
Press wore army uniforms
French and British newspapers often
ran with empty spaces where stories
were pulled by censors
George Seldes interview with German
Gen. Hindenburg was censored after
war, contributing to Dolchstoßlegende
myth that led to rise of Nazis
21. 1918: Photo of US troops celebrating in a German mess hall was
censored because US troops could not be depicted drinking beer.
22. The Bolo Pasha affair
• WWI German plot to buy French
newspapers using money
laundered by American banks.
• Bolo Pasha bought Le Journal
of Paris to advocate surrender to
the Germans.
• Linked to German spy Mata Hari,
also briefly to William Randolph
Hearst
• Pasha was executed for treason
by the French in 1917
The French WWI
Bolo Pasha affair
showed that
manipulation
of the press
could be a
tactic of warfare
23. Russian revolution
‘First step’ in the
Russian Revolution of
1917 was to create a
newspaper
The mere task of
writing and distributing
Iskra (Spark) would
create a network of
agents
Despite this, absolute
censorship was the rule
Execution of dissidents
was commonplace
Vladimir Lenin started
a newspaper in order
to start a revolution.
But he was no friend of
the free press.
24. Mysterious propaganda photo
Ukraine, about 1925. Would journalists really set type on the back of
a truck in the middle of a wheat field? Was it staged, or faked, or
part of a serious effort to get journalists close to the people?
25. John Reed (1887 – 1920)
American journalist who wrote
passionately about the Russian
revolution of 1917.
“As we came out into the dark and
gloomy day all around the grey
horizon, factory whistles were
blowing, a hoarse and nervous
sound, full of foreboding. By tens
of thousands, the working people
poured out … and the humming
slums belched out their dun and
miserable hordes.”
From Ten Days that Shook the
World
27. Nazi
revolution
Germany 1920s -
1945
Took over all
newspapers, wire
services
All journalists who
resisted were killed
Absolute censorship
Nazi book burning,
Opernplatz, Berlin, May 10,
1933.
“A scene not witnessed since
the Middle Ages, and a
harbinger of disaster,” said
correspondent William L.
28. WWII and the US press
Furious debates on US home front
Pre-war links between US and Nazi
industries infuriated Americans
Censorship by military on front lines
◦ But that didn’t stop news about incidents
like Gen. Patton slapping shell-shocked
soldiers
Reconstruction of press in Germany &
Japan was a top post-war priority
29. WWII correspondents
“There is an agony in your
heart and you almost feel
ashamed to look at them.
They are just guys from
Broadway and Main Street,
but you wouldn’t remember
them.… If you could see them
just once, just for an instant,
you would know that no
matter how hard people work
back home, they are not
keeping pace with these
infantrymen.” -- Ernie Pyle“The God-Damned Infantry” was among Ernie Pyle’s best –
remembered articles. A soldier’s writer, Pyle concentrated on the
ordinary guys, not the generals and the grand strategies.
30. WWII correspondents
“The liberation (of Dachau)
was a frenzied scene …
Inmates of the camp hugged
and embraced the American
troops, kissed the ground
before them and carried them
shoulder high around the
place.” -- Marguerite
Higgins, May, 1945
Only three years out of journalism school, Marguerite Higgins
convinced editors at the Herald Tribune to send her to Europe in
1944. She also broke barriers for women reporters everywhere,
convincing Gen. Douglas MacArthur to lift the ban on women
correspondents in the Korean War in 1950.
31. Double V for African
AmericansPittsburg Courier, Chicago
Defender and others were main
source of news for African
Americans
But wartime news of prejudice
and rioting against blacks was
suppressed by government
In WWI, critical reporting even led
to the conviction of one African
American editor under the
Sedition Act
In WWII, settled on “Double V” --
Victory over fascism abroad,
victory over racism at home
Chicago Defender publisher
John Sengstacke and an
unidentified editor c. 1943
32. Hutchins Commission 1947
Truthful, comprehensive, and intelligent
account of the day’s events in a context
which gives them meaning;
Forum for the exchange of comment and
criticism;
Representative picture of the constituent
groups in the society;
Presentation and clarification of the
goals and values of the society; and
Full access to the day’s intelligence.
33. One of the best moments in the history of the press
Press became an agent of US reconciliation
Framed issues as “Civil Rights” not “race war”
Many incidents outraged public
◦ Killings of Emmett Till 1955, Medgar Evers 1963,
Viola Liuzzo, many more
◦ Bombings of churches in Alabama and Georgia
◦ Selma, Alabama bridge attack by police caught
on film changed the world
A civil rights bombing was “… the harvest of
defiance of the courts and the encouragement of
citizens to defy law on the part of many Southern
politicians.” -- Ralph McGill, Atlanta Journal &
Constitution
Civil Rights and the Press
34.
35. Growing global press
influence
The suppression of US civil rights
demonstrators was embarrassing to the
US government
Comparisons were made to Aparthied in
South Africa and the Sharpville
massacre of 1960
US Voting Rights Act of 1965 and federal
support for civil rights was one result
International press coverage was one of
many essential conditions for change
36. Watergate 1972 – 74
Uncovered by two Washington Post
reporters
Found Watergate burglars searching
Democratic national headquarters had
links to Republicans in White House
Investigated “dirty tricks” campaign,
also money to pay operatives and
burglars
Resulted in resignation of President
Richard Nixon and criminal
convictions for seven members of
administration. Money laundering,
extortion, fraud, and tampering with
election process were among the
issues.
Bob Woodward,
Carl Bernstein,
Washington Post
37. Vietnam war coverage
US press critical of war methods but
generally supportive of war aims
TV Networks generally kept gory
footage off the air
Public opinion against war stronger
than press coverage
Idea of press subverting war is akin to
German “dolschtoss” myth
Nevertheless, US conservatives still
blame press for “losing the war”
38. Vietnam coverage was pro-
war
But not pro-war enough
for some US “hawks”
Reporters David
Halberstam (NY Times),
Malcolm Brown (AP) and
Neil Sheehan (UPI)
typified slightly critical
attitude towards the war.
39. Literary Journalism
In 1960s, newspaper & magazine
feature writers broke the molds
Used literary devices to make non-
fiction read like a novel
◦ Dialogue, scene-by-scene construction,
status detail, omniscient narration
Writers included Tom Wolfe, Joan
Dideon, John McPhee
Example: The Right Stuff (about US
space program) by Wolfe.
40. Gonzo Journalism
First person participation
Not objective
Often used alcohol, drugs
Hunter S. Thompson
◦ Fear and Loathing series
◦ Solace in excess like Great Gatsby
◦ Thompson agreed with Faulkner that "the
best fiction is far more true than any kind
of journalism — and the best journalists
have always known this.”
41. Environmental news
Not a new phenomena –
◦ Water pollution was covered by
Benjamin Franklin in 1730s
Major new interest due to
energy crisis, Earth Day, oil
spills, nuclear disasters and
climate change
Specialized science writers
emerge to handle complexities
of coverage
◦ National Association of Science
Writers, Society of Environmental
Journalists
42. End game for the press?
New technologies made
printing more profitable in
1970s …
Leading to consolidations
and mergers … but
Monopolies grew
complacent
Wall Street demanded
even more profit (20-40%)
Press was in a weak
position to meet the digital
revolution 2000 – 2015
45. The usual bromides
Book & newspaper publishing is dead
We’re in a post-literate age
◦ Nobody reads (not true, actually)
Emerging new publishing models
◦ Educational non-profit 501c3
Politico, Climate Central, Env Health News
◦ Subcompact publication
Apple Newsstand, Amazon, Kindle
◦ Self-publishing and eBooks
49. New media investments
Bill Gates (Microsoft)
◦ MSNBC (1996) / successful
Steve Case (AOL)
◦ Merged w/ Time Warner (2000) /
failure
Jeff Bezos (Amazon)
◦ Washington Post, 2013 / jury still out
Peter Omidyar (Ebay)
◦ First Look Media, Fall 2013 / Epic
incompetence, aloof management
50. Review: People
Will Irwin, Richard Harding Davis, Ida
B. Wells, Samuel Hopkins Adams,
Lincoln Steffens, Cecil Chesterton, Ida
Tarell, David Graham Phillips, Upton
Sinclair, Bolo Pasha, George Seldes,
John Reed, Frederick Douglass, John
H. Johnson, Ralph McGill, Homer
Bigart, Bob Woodward, Carl
Bernstein, Tom Wolfe, Hunter S.
Thompson, John Hershey
51. Review: Issues
Minority media, muckrakers, press
in WWI censorship, WWII, Double V,
covering Vietnam, Civil Rights,
Watergate, Hutchins Commission,
Gonzo journalism, Literary journalism,
Environmental & science coverage,
end of the line for newspapers?
Publishers were at the top of their games at the beginning of the 20th century; the technology was mature and the competition was minimal. In the 1970s, following a series of mergers, most cities ended up with only one newspaper. And then, by the early 21st t century, a familiar story had played out: A profitable near-monopoly had underestimated the digital revolution and missed the curve in the road. US newspapers had lost their readers, their advertising and most of their stock value. The free press as an institution, created in the Enlightenment to guide the democratic experiment, was all but dead.
In 1910, a young journalist named Will Irwin took off across the country in search of the American press. In a 14-part series published in Collier’s Magazine, Irwin concluded that the press was “wonderfully able, wonderfully efficient, and wonderfully powerful (but) with real faults.” Yellow journalism, especially the tendency of publishers like William Randolph Hearst to trump up news for personal or partisan reasons, counted as one of the faults. But to Irwin, the biggest fault was that the press did not speak to his generation:
“It is the mouthpiece of an older stock. It lags behind the thought of its times. . . . To us of this younger generation, our daily press is speaking, for the most part, with a dead voice, because the supreme power resides in men of that older generation.”
In Irwin’s view, the twentieth-century spirit of reform was to be found in magazines like Cosmopolitan, Collier’s Weekly, McClure’s Magazine and Munsey’s Magazine. While there had been a few exposes in newspapers, nothing matched the magazine revelations about child labor, slum housing, tainted meat, political graft, insurance fraud, narcotic medicines and the corrupt Standard Oil monopoly.
The “muckrakers” got their name from a speech given by President Theodore Roosevelt in Washington DC on April 14, 1906. The speech instantly galvanized a national debate about the role of the press.
Widely admired for their exposes of monopolies and corrupt public officials, the “muckrakers” were an eclectic group of writers, journalists and social reformers who led the Progressive reform movement of the early 1900s. They used investigative journalism (muckraking) to go beyond standard inquiries and uncover hidden problems.
As they skirted French defenses to cross Belgium in August of 1914, German armies carried out carefully planned reprisals, executing civilians and burning entire towns to the ground. Among the witnesses to the atrocities were a remarkable group of American reporters, including Will Irwin and Richard Harding Davis. Because America was neutral, and had a large German population thought to be sympathetic to Germany, the reporters had been given permission to follow along. What they wrote, however, did anything but encourage sympathy.
Even before war broke out, German newspapers were beating the drums of war. Here Germany and Austria are depicted as under assault from Russia and France. “Two years ago there was hesitation, but now it is said openly even in official military journals that Russia is arming itself for a war against Germany,” the Kölnische Zeitung (Cologne Gazette) warned its readers in a hair-raising article, “Russia and Germany,” published on March 2, 1914. The inflammatory article sparked alarm across Europe, fueling fears in Russia, France, and Britain that the German government was preparing its public for war.
Among the witnesses to the atrocities were a remarkable group of American reporters, including Will Irwin and Richard Harding Davis. Because America was neutral, and had a large German population thought to be sympathetic to Germany, the reporters had been given permission to follow along. What they wrote, however, did anything but encourage sympathy.
British war propaganda was vehement and outraged
Austrian and German war propaganda was like something from a previous century
Another German recruiting poster shows a German soldier looking up at the Kaiser, who is being led by the spirit of Germany.
American war propaganda was not very subtle.
The purpose of censorship was to prevent people at home from learning demoralizing information about defeats and difficult conditions. For example, the worst defeat in British history — the Battle of the Somme in 1916 — involved troop casualties numbering 600,000. Yet the battle was reported as a victory or kept out of the press altogether. One correspondent, William Beach Thomas of the Daily Mail, said later that he was “deeply ashamed” of the cover-up.
This 1918 photo was banned by US censors because American soldiers were not permitted to be seen drinking alcohol, even though the just-captured German beer steins were all empty. Photo by US Army Signal Corps. Heavy handed censorship had more serious consequences, such as when censors edited out reports of German Field Marshall Paul Von Hindenburg’s admission that the American military changed the balance of forces in World War I. Later, the Nazis explained Germany’s defeat in WWI as a stab in the back from the home front. This “Dolchstoss” myth helped propel them to power in the 1930s, according to journalist George Seldes.
. The Bolo Pasha affair was a wartime German plot to finance the purchase of French newspapers using millions of dollars funneled through American banks with the help of US publisher William Randolph Hearst. A German agent, Bolo Pasha, purchased a French newspaper, Le Journal, to deliberately advocate surrender to the Germans. The plot was discovered, in part by still-neutral American authorities, and the French executed Pasha for treason in 1917.
The first step in the Russian Revolution, according to Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, was to create a newspaper, and Lenin created a paper called Iskra (Spark). Not only would it carry the communist message, but the act of working for a newspaper in itself would transform the revolutionaries.
This scene of a “mobile newsroom” belonging to the newspaper “Kolhoznik” (agricultural cooperative) near Kiev was staged around 1925. The banner behind the typesetters reads: “Let us secure the financial basis for Socialist way of life.” The newspaper itself probably served to inform and to engage the workers, but the photo of journalists setting type on a truck in a wheat field is an example of staged events for Soviet communist propaganda. Farm Services Administration, Library of Congress.
“Ten Days That Shook the World” — John Reed’s classic eyewitness account of the 1917 Russian Revolution won worldwide acclaim, and an introduction by Vladimir Lenin. Although Reed sympathized with the revolution, his aim was to tell the story as truthfully as possible. Naturally, this did not sit well with Soviet communists, and the book was banned by premier Joseph Stalin.
It was a scene not witnessed since the Middle Ages: the flames engulfing tens of thousands of German books in May of 1933 seemed ominous harbingers of disaster to William L. Shirer, an Associated Press correspondent in Germany. The descent into barbarism began the moment that Nazi leaders decided that the arts, literature, the press, radio and films would exist only to serve the purpose of Nazi propaganda, he said. Following the Reich Press Law of October, 1933, the country’s 4,700 newspapers were either closed, confiscated or directly controlled by the Nazi party. Most notably, the Nazis closed Voissische Zeitung, a newspaper founded in 1704 and, at that moment in history, comparable to The Times of London or the New York Times.
Censorship barely held down the cantankerous American press. A furious controversy raged on the home front over war preparedness and prewar conspiracies between American and German industries such as Standard Oil (Exxon) and I. G. Farben.
Censorship was not as heavy handed in World War II as in other wars.
Women also covered the war, as historians Maurine H. Beasley and Sheila J. Gibbons pointed out in Taking Their Place (Beasley and Gibbons, 1993). Among the best known was Marguerite Higgins (1920–1966), a writer for the New York Herald Tribune who witnessed the liberation of the Dachau concentration camp in late April, 1945.
Women also covered the war, as historians Maurine H. Beasley and Sheila J. Gibbons pointed out in Taking Their Place (Beasley and Gibbons, 1993). Among the best known was Marguerite Higgins (1920–1966), a writer for the New York Herald Tribune who witnessed the liberation of the Dachau concentration camp in late April, 1945.
After the war, a commission on ethics and the press was set up at the University of Chicago. The Hutchins Commission found that freedom of expression had been imperiled by accelerating technology and by arrogant and irresponsible publishers. The commission urged publishers to “regard themselves as common carriers of information and discussion” and recommended five major points that it said society was entitled to demand of its press.
One of the finest moments in the history of the American press was its response to the civil rights movement that culminated in the 1950s and 60s. To understand that moment, however, it’s important to understand that civil rights advocates had a long history of pleading their own cause in their own press for a century and a half before the cause was appreciated.
The mainstream press, like the country, was divided on the civil rights movement. Editors James J. Kilpatrick of the Richmond, Virginia, Times and Thomas Waring of the Charleston, South Carolina, Courier advocated “massive resistance” to integration and encouraged Southerners to fight for “states rights.”
More temperate Southerner editors advised gradual change. These included Atlanta Journal editor Ralph McGill, Greenville, Mississippi, editor Hodding Carter, and Little Rock editor Harry Ashmore.
Ralph McGill was especially known for crafting carefully balanced editorials to depict the civil rights movement as a sometimes uncomfortable but necessary and even inevitable process—a process that would help build a South that would be, he said, too busy and too generous to hate. After an Atlanta bombing, McGill wrote in a 1959 Pulitzer prize winning editorial: “This . . . is a harvest of defiance of the courts and the encouragement of citizens to defy law on the part of many Southern politicians.” McGill also urged journalists to cover the rising demands for equality as a struggle for “civil rights” — a term we take for granted today, but which at the time struck journalists as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Still, it was far better than the alternative term and self-fulfilling prophecy: “race war.”
This is a photo showing the chaos at the Edmund Pettus Bridge March 7, 1965 – see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_to_Montgomery_marches. Newspaper and television coverage of the incident was so powerful that it overwhelmed opposition to the Voting Rights Act, which was passed on Aug. 6.
In the end, the success of the nonviolent civil rights movement was closely connected with the media’s ability to witness events. “If it hadn’t been for the media—the print media and the television—the civil rights movement would have been like a bird without wings, a choir without a song,” said civil rights leader John Lewis in 2005. Eventually, even conservative editors like Kilpatrick admitted that they had been wrong about civil rights, and the South changed.
In witnessing the suffering of American civil rights demonstrators, the press came to be regarded with gratitude as an agent of national reconciliation.
However, no reconciliation ever took place over Vietnam war or the Watergate political scandals.
Concern about leaks to the press from inside the government led the Nixon administration to assemble a team of former CIA employees as “plumbers” who would fix the “leaks.” One of their assignments was to break into the Democratic National Committee offices at the Watergate apartment and office building in Washington DC. When the burglars were arrested, two young Washington Post reporters—Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein—investigated ties between the burglars and the White House. In the process, Woodward and Bernstein unraveled a web of illegal activities in the White House and the Justice Department, including extortion and bribery.
This led to the resignation of President Nixon in 1974 and criminal convictions for seven high-level members of his administration.
The American experience in World War II informed, to a large extent, the US government’s lack of censorship of press coverage during the Vietnam war. Very few restrictions were imposed in Vietnam. In the early years, the press corps was skeptical about the war, but the reporters themselves saw skepticism as part of their responsibility.
http://www.pbs.org/weta/reportingamericaatwar/reporters/halberstam/coup.html
US reporters became increasingly skeptical about the Vietnam war. David Halberstam initially believed that a US victory was needed to discourage “so-called wars of liberation” but eventually came to the conclusion that the war “was doomed,” and that the United States was “on the wrong side of history.” Neil Sheehan, a UPI reporter, saw the war as being lost on the ground long before it was lost in American public opinion, and wrote a retrospective book called “A Bright Shining Lie.” And studies of US media coverage showed that the news media tended to be neutral while public opinion was increasingly opposed to the war.
The civil rights movement, the Watergate scandals and the anti-war movement all played against a backdrop of a changing society where conventions of all kinds were being challenged. One of the more important conventions of journalism was the idea of objectivity and the “inverted pyramid” form of writing. Magazine and newspaper writers took a different tact in the 1960s with the “literary journalism” movement.
Especially controversial during this experimental era was what Rolling Stone writer Hunter S. Thompson called “gonzo” journalism. At best, the gonzo approach was a hilariously critical, first-person view of people twisted by political and social institutions.
But at its worst, Thompson’s drug-crazed writing churned grimly through a mélange of psychotic episodes, and Thompson’s writing grew worse, not better, as he aged.
For a complete slide show on the history of environmental journalism, see: http://www.slideshare.net/billkovarik/historyejpart-ikovarik?from_search=1
Five and a half centuries after Johannas Gutenberg, the printing revolution seemed to have run its course. Between 2007 and 2014, US newspapers and magazines lost two-thirds of their traditional advertising income, one third of their circulation and three-quarters of their stock value. Over half of newspaper employees were laid off, and the job outlook for all journalists was a long-term decline. Many publications declared bankruptcy or moved to online-only publication.
But that’s what the church said in 1518 ….
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2013/10/28/recent-trends-in-storytelling-and-new-business-models-for-publishers/
And great new media prospects like Line 9 from Toronto http://www.thestar.com/projects/pipeline_journey.html