SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  26
Speech acts
                      Andrew D. Cohen




     Anita Wu
      9659503
Institute of TESOL
Focus of the chapter


•   Definition of speech acts
•   Historical overview of the field
•   Examination of research methodologies
•   Studies on the teaching of speech acts
Definition of speech acts
     • A speech act is a functional unit in
       communication (Cohen, A.D.)
     • It’s an act that a speaker performs when making
       an utterance (def. from LinguaLink website)


According to Austin’s theory of speech acts (1962), utterances have
three kinds of meaning.
1. Propositional/locutionary: literal meaning of an utterance
2. Illocutionary meaning: particular intention in making the utterance
3. Perlocutionary force: production of a particular effect in the addressee
Speech acts categories:
•   Representatives: speakers assert a proposition to be true, using
    such verbs as: affirm, believe, conclude, deny, report.
•   Directives: speaker try to make the hearer do something, with such
    words as: ask, beg, challenge, command, dare, invite, insist,
    request.
•   Commissives: the speaker commits himself (or herself) to a (future)
    course of action, with verbs such as: guarantee, pledge, promise,
    swear, vow, undertake, warrant.
•   Expressives: the speaker expresses an attitude to or about a state
    of affairs, using such verbs as: apologize, appreciate, congratulate,
    deplore, detest, regret, thank, welcome.
•   Declarations speakers alter the external status or condition of an
    object or situation, solely by making the utterance: I now pronounce
    you man and wife, I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until
    you be dead, I name this ship...
Speech act quiz
   Decide which type of speech act is represented by each of these
   statements. A) Propositional b) Illocutionary C) Perlocutionary
1. Your teacher says, "For class tomorrow, please read pages
   twenty-one through forty-seven."
2. While talking to a group of friends, you mention that you
   recently went to hear your favorite band play at a local club.
3. You and a friend are talking about a television show that you
   both watched the night before. You say, "what did you think
   about Luke's reaction to Laura's news?"
4. When you discover that the grade you got on your math exam is
   a "B", you let out a sigh of relief.

   Resources:
   http://www.rdillman.com/HFCL/TUTOR/Relation/rel.ex.speechact.html
Empirical validation of speech act sets

• First concern of the SLA researchers is to
  investigate the set of realization patterns and
  strategies typically used by native speakers in
  appropriate contexts.
• The precondition and interactional goal as well
  as performative and semantic formulas for
  realization the goals need to be determined.
Speech act sets (i.e. apology)




1.   An expression that speakers use contain a performative verb (e.g.
     apologize, excuse, be sorry)
2.   The speaker indirectly commit the offence with use of an
     explanation/account of the situation.
3.   Acknowledgement of responsibility.
4.   An offer of repair. (i.e. bid to take an action; provide payment)
5.   A promise of nonrecurrence.
Sociocultural and sociolinguistic abilities

• Sociocultural ability refers to the respondents’ skill at
  selecting speech act strategies which are appropriate
  given (1)the culture involved, (2) the age and the sex of
  the speaker, (3) their social class and occupations, and (4)
  their roles and status in the interaction.
• Sociolinguistic ability refers to the respondents’ skill at
  selecting appropriate linguistic forms (i.e. register) in
  order to express the particular strategy used to realize the
  speech act.
Selecting the appropriate speech act strategy
and the forms for realizing it

          Social
          status
                                • The process is
                                  complex since it is
                                  conditioned by social,
         Selection                cultural, situational
 age      factors     Social      and personal factors.
                     distance



          culture
Methods for collecting speech act data
• Production of speech acts:
  E.g. observation, naturally occurring data, role play,
 discourse completion tasks, verbal report interview

 • Perception of speech acts:
 • Recent studies have looked at group reaction to
  videotaped role play or screen play using
  questionnaire and verbal report interviews based
  on review of naturally occurring data.
Methods for collecting speech act data (cont’d)

• Multimethod approach:
        Verbal report
                              Observation
         interview




     Perception                       Role play
    Questionnaire

                      Discourse
                    completion task

            Ideal cycle of data collection
Naturally occurring data
•    Advantages:
    1.   Spontaneous
    2.   The data reflect what spkers say rather than what they think
         they would say
    3.   The pskers are reacting to a natural situation
    4.   Real-world consequences
•    Disadvantages :
    1.   May not occur often
    2.   Proficiency and gender are not easy to control
    3.   Time-consuming
    4.   Recording may be intrusive; note-taking rely on memory
Naturally occurring data versus discourse
completion task

• Hartford and Bardovi-Harlig (1992) study
  compared data of the two from NS and NNS on
  rejections of advice.
• Results indicate that DCT elicited a narrower
  range of semantic formulas, fewer status-
  provoking strategies, and none of the extended
  negotiations found in the natural data.
Verbal report interview

• The production of speech                  • The perception of speech
  acts:                                       act:
1. interview on DCT answers (Motti,          1. Creese (1991) and Zuskin
   1987)                                      (1993) studies used prompt from
2. record think aloud process and             naturally occurring data or
   then interview (Robinson, 1991)            videotaped materials for NNS
                                              and NS to interpret
3. Cohen and Olshtain (1993)
   recorded fifteen advanced EFL             2. Most studies aimed to find the
   lrners’ role play with NS in six given     cross cultural differences on
   speech act situations followed by          speech act perceptions
   an interview.
Review of empirical studies: Apologies
• Research on production:
• Frescura (1993) coded data from role plays according
  to a taxonomy comprising semantic formulas in 2
  categories: hearer-supportive formulas and self-
  supportive formulas.
                                   Complianee choose to
      Complainees choose to        save their own face
      support the face of the      by…
      complainer by …
                                 1. Deny guilt
    1. Admit their own guilt
                                 2. Appeal to others’
    2. Recognize others rights      leniency
    3. Offer compensation        3. Provide an explanation
Apologies (cont’d)
• Research on perception of apologies:
• Edmundson (1992) looked at the semantic formulas in
  apologies, including the ways of interpretation, the cues
  being used and the rules needed to interpretation.

           Subjects use mostly prosodic cues (i.e. intonation and
findings   word stress) to judge the sincerity of an apology. And
           appropriateness of apologies was rated according to its
           level of sincerity.
  Women rely more on lexical cues to judge the sincerity; men
 rely on both lexical, paralinguistic (nonverbal) and
 prosodic cues equally.
Refusals


•   Three follow-up studies (1987, 1990 &1991) investigated the refusals by NS
    and Japanese ESL and EFL learners.
•   Results indicated the (negative) transfer existed in both ESL and EFL
    contexts.
•   Excuses are common for both language, but American ones in English were
    more specific.
•   Verbal report in Robinson(1991) study showed how sociocultural factors
    constraint Japanese women to say no since they are brought up to say yes.
Situation: Concert Ticket
Your classmate, Tony, plays in a jazz band. He
is going to have a concert soon and he asks you
to buy a ticket to it. You really do not want to go
because it will cost you $23 and you feel this is
too expensive.
• What are the appropriate refusals you would
say to your friend?
Rejections
• Hartford and Bardovi-Harling (1991, 1992, 1993)
  conducted a series of studies on rejections of
  advice and found that…
 ☺ NS are able to reject an adviser’s suggestion while maintaining
 the status balance, while NNS are less predictably to do so.
 ☺ NNS used more semantic formulas to realize each rejection and
 made more rejections; NS made more than twice as often as they
 rejected advice.

          1. Explanations
          2. Alternatives
          3. Rejections
Compliments



•   Olshtain and Weinbach (1988) looked at 330 Israeli & 330 American
    responses on DCT and found five forms of response:
         1. reinforcing the compliment
          2. simply thanking the complimenter
          3. agree with it
          4. justify it
          5. express surprise
•   Israelis accepted a compliment with greater difficulty than Americans.
Complaints

          Strategies           Remarks
          combination
          Indirect complaint   •It’s ok. Don’t worry about it.
                               •It’s ok. Accidents happen.
                               •It’s ok. It’s not like you meant to do it.

          Request for repair   •Do/ Don’t do X
                               •Can (Could) I/you X…
                               •I’d like to X…
                               •I was wondering if I/you can (could) X…


• DeCapua (1988) study showed ♀made more requests for repairs
  than♂
• Boxer (1993) study indicated that ♀ mostly commiserated with
  indirect complaints; ♂were prone to contradict or to give advice.
Requests

 • Fukushima and Iwata(1987) compared
   strategies used in requesting and found
   similar formulas in Japanese and English:
    1.apology reason request,
    2.address term request reason,
    3.address term and/or apology reason
   • Can you think of any examples?
   • Are these orders similar to our way of requesting?
The acquisition of speech acts

• The classroom lacked
  the conditions for the
  whole range of
  sociolinguistic needs
  even though it
  fostered interpersonal
  and expressive
  needs.
The teaching of speech acts
 • The findings from a cross-cultural study by Cohen,
   Olshtain, and Rosenstein (1986) showed that NNS
   lacked sensitivity to certain sociolinguistic distinction
   that NS make….
       For example:
                 excuse me vs. sorry
                 really sorry vs. very sorry
 • Acquisition of nativelike production by nonnative
   speakers may take many years.
Implication for language teacher, the learner, and the
language classroom
1.   Diagnostic assessment is often the first step which helps the
     teacher determine the students’ level of awareness of speech
     acts in general.
2.   Model dialogues are a useful way to present students with
     examples of the speech act in use.
3.   The evaluation of a situation is a useful technique to further
     reinforce the learners’ awareness of the factors affecting the
     choice of semantic formulas.
4.   Role-play activities are particularly suitable for practicing the use
     of speech acts.
5.   Feedback and discussion are useful activities for speech act
     teaching because students need to talk about their perceptions &
     awareness.
Quiz answer
1. PERLOCUTIONARY The teacher intends to affect your behavior.
    Speech by which the speaker attempts to get someone else to do
    something is a perlocutionary act.
2.PROPOSITIONAL You are making a reference to the band and its
    performance at the club. Speech by which the speaker points out
    the existence of something is a propositional act.
3. ILLOCUTIONARY You are inviting your friend to respond to your
    question. Speech by which the speaker attempts to interact with
    someone else is an illocutionary act.
4. UTTERANCE You are not trying to communicate anything to
   anyone. When people make sounds without intending to convey
  meaning, they engage in utterance.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Discourse analysis for teachers
Discourse analysis for teachersDiscourse analysis for teachers
Discourse analysis for teachers1104054398
 
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)1213anita
 
Politeness (Pragmatics)
Politeness (Pragmatics)Politeness (Pragmatics)
Politeness (Pragmatics)Humaira Flair
 
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURECONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTUREAdela Perez del Viso
 
Input and Interaction in second language learning
Input and Interaction in second language learningInput and Interaction in second language learning
Input and Interaction in second language learningMahsa Farahanynia
 
Second Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionSecond Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionMiguel
 
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisition
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language AquisitionSLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisition
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisitionmoji azimi
 
Pragmatic and Speech act.ppt
Pragmatic and Speech act.pptPragmatic and Speech act.ppt
Pragmatic and Speech act.pptEny Chan
 
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisition
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisitionIndividual learner differences and l2 acquisition
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisitionozzyl_bintang
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysisAlvy Mayrina
 
Social contexts of second language acquisition
Social contexts of second language acquisitionSocial contexts of second language acquisition
Social contexts of second language acquisitionVale Caicedo
 

Tendances (20)

Discourse analysis for teachers
Discourse analysis for teachersDiscourse analysis for teachers
Discourse analysis for teachers
 
Conversation analysis
Conversation analysisConversation analysis
Conversation analysis
 
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)
Speech Act (Andrew D. Cohen)
 
Politeness (Pragmatics)
Politeness (Pragmatics)Politeness (Pragmatics)
Politeness (Pragmatics)
 
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURECONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
 
Input and Interaction in second language learning
Input and Interaction in second language learningInput and Interaction in second language learning
Input and Interaction in second language learning
 
Week 9 language change
Week 9 language changeWeek 9 language change
Week 9 language change
 
Second Language Acquisition
Second Language AcquisitionSecond Language Acquisition
Second Language Acquisition
 
PRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTS
PRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTSPRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTS
PRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTS
 
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisition
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language AquisitionSLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisition
SLA ,Learning Theories , Second language Aquisition
 
Pragmatic and Speech act.ppt
Pragmatic and Speech act.pptPragmatic and Speech act.ppt
Pragmatic and Speech act.ppt
 
Adjacency pair
Adjacency pairAdjacency pair
Adjacency pair
 
Hedging maxims
Hedging maximsHedging maxims
Hedging maxims
 
Error analysis
Error analysis Error analysis
Error analysis
 
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisition
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisitionIndividual learner differences and l2 acquisition
Individual learner differences and l2 acquisition
 
Learner Language
Learner LanguageLearner Language
Learner Language
 
Participants in Discourse
Participants in DiscourseParticipants in Discourse
Participants in Discourse
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Social contexts of second language acquisition
Social contexts of second language acquisitionSocial contexts of second language acquisition
Social contexts of second language acquisition
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 

En vedette

En vedette (14)

Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
SPEECH ACT THEORY
SPEECH ACT THEORYSPEECH ACT THEORY
SPEECH ACT THEORY
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
Speech act
Speech actSpeech act
Speech act
 
English needs analysis project
English needs analysis projectEnglish needs analysis project
English needs analysis project
 
Speech Acts
Speech ActsSpeech Acts
Speech Acts
 
Week 4 illocutionary acts
Week 4 illocutionary actsWeek 4 illocutionary acts
Week 4 illocutionary acts
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for students06 speech act and event for students
06 speech act and event for students
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
Pragmatics (Speech Acts)
 

Similaire à Speech act-andrew-d-cohen-1206263596754620-5

Discourse analytic approaches
Discourse analytic approachesDiscourse analytic approaches
Discourse analytic approachesKhadija Hamidani
 
Sociolinguistic and law
Sociolinguistic and lawSociolinguistic and law
Sociolinguistic and lawMd Syed Ahamad
 
Second and foreign language data
Second and foreign language dataSecond and foreign language data
Second and foreign language dataVivaAs
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysisnawazish ali
 
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred Responses
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred ResponsesConversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred Responses
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred ResponsesRoberto Criollo
 
NEW Ch1 Public Speaking
NEW Ch1 Public SpeakingNEW Ch1 Public Speaking
NEW Ch1 Public Speakingms451711
 
report on speech acts
report on speech actsreport on speech acts
report on speech actsSeemab Abbas
 
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics 云珍 邓
 
Transformational grammar
Transformational grammarTransformational grammar
Transformational grammarJack Feng
 
DiscourseAnalysis.ppt
DiscourseAnalysis.pptDiscourseAnalysis.ppt
DiscourseAnalysis.pptAlaaNajeeb2
 
Explanation of discourse analysis
Explanation of discourse analysisExplanation of discourse analysis
Explanation of discourse analysisEika Matari
 
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptx
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptx
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptxGINAMARITZAPRIETOGUE
 

Similaire à Speech act-andrew-d-cohen-1206263596754620-5 (20)

Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 
Discourse analytic approaches
Discourse analytic approachesDiscourse analytic approaches
Discourse analytic approaches
 
Language and Culture
Language and CultureLanguage and Culture
Language and Culture
 
Intro to language
Intro to languageIntro to language
Intro to language
 
Sociolinguistic and law
Sociolinguistic and lawSociolinguistic and law
Sociolinguistic and law
 
Second and foreign language data
Second and foreign language dataSecond and foreign language data
Second and foreign language data
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Chomskyan linguistics
Chomskyan linguisticsChomskyan linguistics
Chomskyan linguistics
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred Responses
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred ResponsesConversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred Responses
Conversation Analysis: Directness in NNS's Dispreferred Responses
 
NEW Ch1 Public Speaking
NEW Ch1 Public SpeakingNEW Ch1 Public Speaking
NEW Ch1 Public Speaking
 
report on speech acts
report on speech actsreport on speech acts
report on speech acts
 
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics Rzeszov ling pragmatics
Rzeszov ling pragmatics
 
Transformational grammar
Transformational grammarTransformational grammar
Transformational grammar
 
DiscourseAnalysis.ppt
DiscourseAnalysis.pptDiscourseAnalysis.ppt
DiscourseAnalysis.ppt
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Explanation of discourse analysis
Explanation of discourse analysisExplanation of discourse analysis
Explanation of discourse analysis
 
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptx
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptx
pragmatics-161219170717.pptxpragmatics-161219170717.pptx
 

Speech act-andrew-d-cohen-1206263596754620-5

  • 1. Speech acts Andrew D. Cohen Anita Wu 9659503 Institute of TESOL
  • 2. Focus of the chapter • Definition of speech acts • Historical overview of the field • Examination of research methodologies • Studies on the teaching of speech acts
  • 3. Definition of speech acts • A speech act is a functional unit in communication (Cohen, A.D.) • It’s an act that a speaker performs when making an utterance (def. from LinguaLink website) According to Austin’s theory of speech acts (1962), utterances have three kinds of meaning. 1. Propositional/locutionary: literal meaning of an utterance 2. Illocutionary meaning: particular intention in making the utterance 3. Perlocutionary force: production of a particular effect in the addressee
  • 4. Speech acts categories: • Representatives: speakers assert a proposition to be true, using such verbs as: affirm, believe, conclude, deny, report. • Directives: speaker try to make the hearer do something, with such words as: ask, beg, challenge, command, dare, invite, insist, request. • Commissives: the speaker commits himself (or herself) to a (future) course of action, with verbs such as: guarantee, pledge, promise, swear, vow, undertake, warrant. • Expressives: the speaker expresses an attitude to or about a state of affairs, using such verbs as: apologize, appreciate, congratulate, deplore, detest, regret, thank, welcome. • Declarations speakers alter the external status or condition of an object or situation, solely by making the utterance: I now pronounce you man and wife, I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you be dead, I name this ship...
  • 5. Speech act quiz Decide which type of speech act is represented by each of these statements. A) Propositional b) Illocutionary C) Perlocutionary 1. Your teacher says, "For class tomorrow, please read pages twenty-one through forty-seven." 2. While talking to a group of friends, you mention that you recently went to hear your favorite band play at a local club. 3. You and a friend are talking about a television show that you both watched the night before. You say, "what did you think about Luke's reaction to Laura's news?" 4. When you discover that the grade you got on your math exam is a "B", you let out a sigh of relief. Resources: http://www.rdillman.com/HFCL/TUTOR/Relation/rel.ex.speechact.html
  • 6. Empirical validation of speech act sets • First concern of the SLA researchers is to investigate the set of realization patterns and strategies typically used by native speakers in appropriate contexts. • The precondition and interactional goal as well as performative and semantic formulas for realization the goals need to be determined.
  • 7. Speech act sets (i.e. apology) 1. An expression that speakers use contain a performative verb (e.g. apologize, excuse, be sorry) 2. The speaker indirectly commit the offence with use of an explanation/account of the situation. 3. Acknowledgement of responsibility. 4. An offer of repair. (i.e. bid to take an action; provide payment) 5. A promise of nonrecurrence.
  • 8. Sociocultural and sociolinguistic abilities • Sociocultural ability refers to the respondents’ skill at selecting speech act strategies which are appropriate given (1)the culture involved, (2) the age and the sex of the speaker, (3) their social class and occupations, and (4) their roles and status in the interaction. • Sociolinguistic ability refers to the respondents’ skill at selecting appropriate linguistic forms (i.e. register) in order to express the particular strategy used to realize the speech act.
  • 9. Selecting the appropriate speech act strategy and the forms for realizing it Social status • The process is complex since it is conditioned by social, Selection cultural, situational age factors Social and personal factors. distance culture
  • 10. Methods for collecting speech act data • Production of speech acts: E.g. observation, naturally occurring data, role play, discourse completion tasks, verbal report interview • Perception of speech acts: • Recent studies have looked at group reaction to videotaped role play or screen play using questionnaire and verbal report interviews based on review of naturally occurring data.
  • 11. Methods for collecting speech act data (cont’d) • Multimethod approach: Verbal report Observation interview Perception Role play Questionnaire Discourse completion task Ideal cycle of data collection
  • 12. Naturally occurring data • Advantages: 1. Spontaneous 2. The data reflect what spkers say rather than what they think they would say 3. The pskers are reacting to a natural situation 4. Real-world consequences • Disadvantages : 1. May not occur often 2. Proficiency and gender are not easy to control 3. Time-consuming 4. Recording may be intrusive; note-taking rely on memory
  • 13. Naturally occurring data versus discourse completion task • Hartford and Bardovi-Harlig (1992) study compared data of the two from NS and NNS on rejections of advice. • Results indicate that DCT elicited a narrower range of semantic formulas, fewer status- provoking strategies, and none of the extended negotiations found in the natural data.
  • 14. Verbal report interview • The production of speech • The perception of speech acts: act: 1. interview on DCT answers (Motti, 1. Creese (1991) and Zuskin 1987) (1993) studies used prompt from 2. record think aloud process and naturally occurring data or then interview (Robinson, 1991) videotaped materials for NNS and NS to interpret 3. Cohen and Olshtain (1993) recorded fifteen advanced EFL 2. Most studies aimed to find the lrners’ role play with NS in six given cross cultural differences on speech act situations followed by speech act perceptions an interview.
  • 15. Review of empirical studies: Apologies • Research on production: • Frescura (1993) coded data from role plays according to a taxonomy comprising semantic formulas in 2 categories: hearer-supportive formulas and self- supportive formulas. Complianee choose to Complainees choose to save their own face support the face of the by… complainer by … 1. Deny guilt 1. Admit their own guilt 2. Appeal to others’ 2. Recognize others rights leniency 3. Offer compensation 3. Provide an explanation
  • 16. Apologies (cont’d) • Research on perception of apologies: • Edmundson (1992) looked at the semantic formulas in apologies, including the ways of interpretation, the cues being used and the rules needed to interpretation. Subjects use mostly prosodic cues (i.e. intonation and findings word stress) to judge the sincerity of an apology. And appropriateness of apologies was rated according to its level of sincerity. Women rely more on lexical cues to judge the sincerity; men rely on both lexical, paralinguistic (nonverbal) and prosodic cues equally.
  • 17. Refusals • Three follow-up studies (1987, 1990 &1991) investigated the refusals by NS and Japanese ESL and EFL learners. • Results indicated the (negative) transfer existed in both ESL and EFL contexts. • Excuses are common for both language, but American ones in English were more specific. • Verbal report in Robinson(1991) study showed how sociocultural factors constraint Japanese women to say no since they are brought up to say yes.
  • 18. Situation: Concert Ticket Your classmate, Tony, plays in a jazz band. He is going to have a concert soon and he asks you to buy a ticket to it. You really do not want to go because it will cost you $23 and you feel this is too expensive. • What are the appropriate refusals you would say to your friend?
  • 19. Rejections • Hartford and Bardovi-Harling (1991, 1992, 1993) conducted a series of studies on rejections of advice and found that… ☺ NS are able to reject an adviser’s suggestion while maintaining the status balance, while NNS are less predictably to do so. ☺ NNS used more semantic formulas to realize each rejection and made more rejections; NS made more than twice as often as they rejected advice. 1. Explanations 2. Alternatives 3. Rejections
  • 20. Compliments • Olshtain and Weinbach (1988) looked at 330 Israeli & 330 American responses on DCT and found five forms of response: 1. reinforcing the compliment 2. simply thanking the complimenter 3. agree with it 4. justify it 5. express surprise • Israelis accepted a compliment with greater difficulty than Americans.
  • 21. Complaints Strategies Remarks combination Indirect complaint •It’s ok. Don’t worry about it. •It’s ok. Accidents happen. •It’s ok. It’s not like you meant to do it. Request for repair •Do/ Don’t do X •Can (Could) I/you X… •I’d like to X… •I was wondering if I/you can (could) X… • DeCapua (1988) study showed ♀made more requests for repairs than♂ • Boxer (1993) study indicated that ♀ mostly commiserated with indirect complaints; ♂were prone to contradict or to give advice.
  • 22. Requests • Fukushima and Iwata(1987) compared strategies used in requesting and found similar formulas in Japanese and English: 1.apology reason request, 2.address term request reason, 3.address term and/or apology reason • Can you think of any examples? • Are these orders similar to our way of requesting?
  • 23. The acquisition of speech acts • The classroom lacked the conditions for the whole range of sociolinguistic needs even though it fostered interpersonal and expressive needs.
  • 24. The teaching of speech acts • The findings from a cross-cultural study by Cohen, Olshtain, and Rosenstein (1986) showed that NNS lacked sensitivity to certain sociolinguistic distinction that NS make…. For example: excuse me vs. sorry really sorry vs. very sorry • Acquisition of nativelike production by nonnative speakers may take many years.
  • 25. Implication for language teacher, the learner, and the language classroom 1. Diagnostic assessment is often the first step which helps the teacher determine the students’ level of awareness of speech acts in general. 2. Model dialogues are a useful way to present students with examples of the speech act in use. 3. The evaluation of a situation is a useful technique to further reinforce the learners’ awareness of the factors affecting the choice of semantic formulas. 4. Role-play activities are particularly suitable for practicing the use of speech acts. 5. Feedback and discussion are useful activities for speech act teaching because students need to talk about their perceptions & awareness.
  • 26. Quiz answer 1. PERLOCUTIONARY The teacher intends to affect your behavior. Speech by which the speaker attempts to get someone else to do something is a perlocutionary act. 2.PROPOSITIONAL You are making a reference to the band and its performance at the club. Speech by which the speaker points out the existence of something is a propositional act. 3. ILLOCUTIONARY You are inviting your friend to respond to your question. Speech by which the speaker attempts to interact with someone else is an illocutionary act. 4. UTTERANCE You are not trying to communicate anything to anyone. When people make sounds without intending to convey meaning, they engage in utterance.