Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Solar PV on Dry Lakebed Soil
1. Department of Water and Power
City of Los Angeles
California State Lands Commission
Owens Lake Demonstration Project
Yamen Nanne
Solar Energy Development
June 2nd, 2010
2. Presentation Outline
LADWP Renewables Overview
Project Background & Drivers
Project Development Review & Status
Solar Technologies Assessment
Wind Tunnel Testing
Geotechnical affects on foundations
Revised Solar Demonstration Project Structure
Feedback & Recommendations on Next Steps
2
3. Los Angeles Department of Water Power (LADWP) Env / Energy Policies
LADWP & Green LA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Goals:
o
o
Deliver coal-free energy to customers by 2020.
o
Reduce GHG emissions to 20% below 1990 levels by 2012 and to 35% below 1990 levels by 2030.
Compliance with other GHG reduction legislation such as AB32, SB1368, etc.
Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS):
o
Energy sold to LADWP customers include 20% renewable resource by 2010 and 35% by 2020.
Integrated Resource Plan:
o
LADWP plans to assure adequate resources to meet customer energy needs reliably and economically.
o
Incorporates strategies to meet GHG, RPS goals, and integration requirements.
Energy Cost Adjustment Factor (ECAF)
o
The ECAF authorizes the LADWP to recover their costs due to the fluctuating costs of renewable sources of
power, fuel/natural gas, and escalating costs of third party provided purchased power.
3
5. LADWP Solar Program
Solar LA Program
Existing Programs
Utility Built
Brief Description
LADWP will install utility-scale solar projects using local labor on
City owned land & facilities.
Solar Incentive Program (SB1) Encourage ratepayers to install solar systems to supplement their
own utility purchases.
Programs Under
Devlopment
Large Scale Power Purchase
Agreements (PPA)
Brief Description
Long-term PPAs with solar developers, including an option for
LADWP to own the project.
Feed-In-Tariff (FIT)
Allows LADWP customers & solar power providers to sell energy
to LADWP (Distribution grid connected).
Sunshares (Community
Projects)
Enables ratepayers to participate in community solar energy
development
5
6. Solar Demonstration Project Background
LADWP Water System has dust mitigation commitments at Owens Dry Lake (ODL)
Power System has RPS goals of 20% by 2010 & 35% by 2020
July 2009, LADWP proposed concept of solar as a means of non-water based dust mitigation
August 2009, GB established criteria for using solar as a Best Available Control Measure (BACM)
Sept – Dec 2009 LADWP conducted extensive wind tunnel testing for feasibility of solar
Wind model configurations showed that solar in combination with other non-water based control
measures can reach the 99% compliance threshold
December 2009 - GB agreed to allow LADWP to conduct a solar demonstration project (Demo)
Initially LADWP filed a Notice of Exemption (NOE) request for a 616 acre
LADWP Water System submitted a lease application for 80 acres
Canceled NOE and initiated Negative Declaration (ND)
Power System Consultants conducted an feasibility assessment based on Phase 7 Geotechnical Data
6
7. Demonstration Project Drivers
Provide a field verification as requested by GBUAPCD to validate the use of solar
integrated with other mitigation mechanisms as a BACM
Substantial Long term water savings for LA & the State of California
GHG reduction & Air Quality Improvement
Economic development & job creation
Help DWP meet its renewable energy program using its existing transmission
Validate the feasibility of doing solar on the Lake
–
Tackle Geotechnical / Soil Conditions
–
System / Construction costs
–
Operation & Maintenance costs
–
Provide an innovative case study for future projects
7
8. LADWP Solar Project Implementation Process
Site Assessment
Technology
Assessment
Environmental
Review
Environmental
Compliance
Preliminary
Design
Preliminary Cost /
Feasibility Study
Prepare Detailed
Design Bid
Award Bid &
Procure Material
Construction
8
12. Why Solar at Owens Lake
Very High Solar Resource
Average Solar resource ~ above 7.5 kWh / m2 /day
Solar resource x solar cell efficiency x area of panel = energy output per day (kWh)
Utilize existing transmission lines and corridors
Utilize previously disturbed land
Weather data shows 89% sunny days
Per existing weather station
Strategic location within CA
12
15. Solar Technology 3 – Membrane Thin Film PV
One pod, two panels of solar cells
Solar cells on a floating cover
(Courtesy Dow Geomembrane Systems).
15
18. Preferred Technology – Standard PV
Proven Commercially Technology
Minimal water use
Lowest cost & maintenance
Modular constructability
LADWP had existing RFP for Design & Procurement
Fixed panels most likely to provide most optimal ground coverage
18
20. GBUAPCD - Wind Reduction Criterion
Historically, Best Available Control Measures (BACM) required to achieve
99 percent reduction in dust emissions on the Owens playa (SIP, Chapter 8,
Attachment B, Item 3(c)iii).
For solar, measure of success defined by the District as complete
sheltering of 99 percent or more of the area within the solar panel array.
Previous Control measures required 75% coverage to achieve 99% sheltering
The design wind speed defined by District is 22.4 m/s (50 mph) at 10 m
above ground. Complete sheltering occurs when the wind speed at 0.254 m
above ground is 4.5 m/s or less.
Complete sheltering occurs when the wind speed at a height of 0.254 m (10
inches) above ground is reduced to 20 percent or less of the wind speed at
10 m.
20
21. 1 MW PV Block
642 ft x 538 ft
7.9 Acres
Solar Covering 6.9 Acres
Major Components
–
PV Modules
–
Inverter
–
Foundations
–
Racking
–
Electrical Wiring
–
Fencing
21
23. 5
5
5
5
5
5
9
9
7
5
5
9
9
In
te
rio
rR
ow
Sp
Ex
ac
te
in
rio
g
Pe r
R
rim o
C et w
or er S
n
F p
W erin en acin
in g ce g
d
D Fen
ef
le ce
ct
or
CONFIG
A21
A22
A23
A24
A25
A26
C21
C22
D (D21 & D22)
E22
E23
F (F21 & F22)
G (G21 & G22)
In
te
r
Ex ior
te Ro
In rior ws
te R
r
o
Ex ior ws
Ti
te
lt
H rior
ei
gh Tilt
t
Wind Tunnel Test Configuration Summary
4 30 20 3'
12'
4 30 20 3'
12'
4 30 20 3'
12'
30
3'
12'
4 30 20 3'
12'
4 30 20 3'
12'
30
3'
12'
30
3'
12'
30
3' Long Checker
4 30 20 1'
12'
4 30 20 1'
12'
4 30 20 1' 16', Checker
4 30 20 1' 16', Checker
Hnorth (H21 & H24) 15 4 30 20 1'
Hsouth (H23 & H22) 15 4 30 20 1'
I21
9 4 30 20 1'
I (I22 & I23)
9 4 30 20 1'
J21
7
5
3'
J22
7
5
3'
J23
7
5
3'
K21
7
5
3'
K22
7
5
3'
K23
7
5
3'
K24
7
5
3'
16', Checker
16', Checker
16', Checker
16', Checker
3'
3'
3'
6'
6'
6'
6'
12' 8'
porous back
12'
porous back
12' 8'
No
8'
No
12' 8'
porous back
12' 8'
porous back
8'
No
8'
No
8'
No
12'
No
12' 8'
No
12' 12' 10' solid toe
12' 12' 10' solid toe, solid back and sides in
places
12' 12' 10' solid toe
12' 12' 10' solid toe
12' 12' 10' solid toe, various additional fencing
12' 12' 10' solid toe, interior fencing
12'
No
12'
solid toe
12'
solid toe, 3' surrounding fence
12'
solid toe
6'
solid toe
6'
solid toe, 3' surrounding fence
12'
solid toe, 3' surrounding fence
23
27. Best and Worst K24 with Gravel Rows
Alternate Interpolation
(biased low)
Original Interpolation
(biased high)
27
28. Lease Application Background
•
LADWP Submitted a Lease Application Feb 24, 2010
•
80 Acres of Land for a Solar
•
Within Area T1A-4 of Phase 7
•
Solar augmented w/ gravel
•
Solar within earthen berms
•
Emerging technologies
•
On March 22nd responded w/ a letter to LADWP requesting further details on the
specifics of what the demo project will entail
•
Since then:
•
Continued economic and geotechnical analysis of best solutions to implement
for the Demo
28
29. Soil Conditions at T1A-4
Based on Phase 7 Geotechnical Data
–
–
Severely corrosive chloride & sulfate
–
Shallow ground water
–
Substantial differential settlement
–
Clayey lacustrine deposits
Required concrete ballasts
Ballast foundations & racking
–
–
8x3x1 ft ballast
Significant cost increase
Need for additional more specific
geotechnical investigation
29
30. Scope of Geotechnical Study
Submit GeoTech Permit
Investigate 20 acres on T37-1
Investigate 20 acres on Area 1 of Phase 8
Foundation design
–
Bearing capacity of soil
–
Experimental foundations
•
Subgrade Preparation
–
Piles, Hemispherical, Rect / Square
Blending in material (lime, cement)
Loading scenarios
–
Axial, lateral, & combined
–
Using a backhoe & spring scale
30
35. Remaining Milestones
June 9th Owens Lake Master Planning Committee Presentation
GeoTech Permit
GeoTechnical Investigation
Revise Lease / Project Description
Draft Neg Dec Completed
Board approval of final CEQA document
Engineer & procure system
Construction
COD : Target of July 1st, 2011 but no later than Oct 1st, 2011
–
Wind season is October – June, however Demo can be validated if significant wind events occur
Monitoring & Validation Period
35
AB32 directs Air Resources Board (ARB) to develop a statewide comprehensive plan to reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.SB1368 requires new or upgraded electric generation facilities and contracts to be at least as clean as a combined cycle.
Water System has dust mitigation commitments at Owens Dry Lake (ODL) that are regulated by the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (GB) In August 2009, GB established criteria for using solar as a dust mitigation – solar equipment must reduce surface level wind speed by 80% of a 50 mph wind from any direction, over 99% of the areaLADWP studied and tested about 30 different solar photovoltaic configurations to mitigate dust, including various solar array orientations, tilts, heights and spacing, and using different fencing and gravel placement. See example of a configuration on the next slide.Wind model configurations showed that solar in combination can reached 98% compliance. A 99% compliance threshold, as required by GB, was not attained. Preliminary engineering & economic assessments showed that the most complex design that reach the 98% compliance, if implemented in the field, would be very expensive according to Black & Vetch (B&V), and will inherently have higher maintenance costs.December 2009 - GB agreed to allow LADWP to move forward on a solar demonstration project (Demo) on a conditional basis that we provide them the authority as a monitoring agency during the Demonstration validation period
While capital costs for a number of Alternative Energy generation technologies (e.g., solar PV, solar thermal) are currently inexcess of conventional generation technologies (e.g., gas, coal, nuclear), declining costs for many Alternative Energygeneration technologies, coupled with rising long-term construction and fuel costs for conventional generation technologies,are working to close formerly wide gaps in electricity costs. IGCC - Integrated gasification combined cycle
Certain Alternative Energy generation technologies are becoming increasingly cost-competitive with conventional generationtechnologies under some scenarios, before factoring in environmental and other externalities (e.g., RECs, potential carbonemission costs, transmission and back-up generation/system reliability costs) as well as construction and fuel costs dynamicsaffecting conventional generation technologies
Most Economic is overheadAlternate is to put on sub-surface