SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  264
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Analysis of Structures
Prof. Dr. Ahmed Hasan Zubydan
Analysis of Structures
B
Prof. Dr. Ahmed Hasan Zubydan
Professor of Structural Engineering
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering
PortSaid University.
Contents
Chapter 1 Statics of Structures
1.1 Supports and Reactions
1.2 Stability and Determinancy
1.3 Condition Equations
1.4 Computation of Reactions
Chapter 2 Trusses
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Trusses Configuration
2.3 Condition Equations
2.4 Stability and Determinancy
2.5 Methods of Analysis of Simple and Compound Trusses
2.6 Method of Joints
2.7 Method of Sections
2.8 Complex Trusses
2.9 Graphical Method of Joints (Maxwell Diagram)
Chapter 3 Statically Determinate Beams and Frames
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Axial Force, Shear Force, and Bending Moment Diagrams
3.3 Relationship between Load, Shear, and Bending Moment
Chapter 4 Influence Lines for Statically determinate Structures
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Applications of Influence Lines
4.3 Distributed Load
4.4 Concentrated Load
4.5 Maximum Absolute Bending Moment
1
1
2
4
15
31
31
31
32
33
45
45
58
80
84
103
103
104
125
187
187
246
247
250
256
1
Statics of Structures
1.1 SUPPORTS AND REACTIONS
Reaction forces are developed at supports of a structure to equilibrate the effect of the
applied forces. The supports through which a structure transmits its load to the supporting
foundation can be classified as follows:
Roller support:
This support provides restraint against linear movement in the direction normal to supporting
surface as shown in Fig. 1.1a. The magnitude of the resultant reaction force at node a is given
directly by Ra. The direction of Ra is perpendicular to the roller surface and the point of
application is at point a.
Hinge support:
It constrains all translations at the point of attachment, but the structure is free to rotate about
this point. The unknown independent reaction components are Ya and Xa as shown in Fig 1.1b.
Fixed support:
It constrains the point of attachment from translation and rotation. With this type of supports,
there are three unknowns. The unknowns are two reaction forces Xa and Ya in addition to a
fixing moment Ma as shown in Fig. 1.1c.
Guide support:
It constrains the structure from rotation and translation normal to the guide slot as shown in
Fig. 1.1d. Thus, while there is no reactive forces parallel to the slot, there is an unknown force
normal to the slot (Ra) and an unknown bending moment at the support (Ma).
(a) Roller support
Ra
a
Ra
a
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.2
(b) Hinge support
(c) Fixed support (d) Guide support
Fig. 1.1 Symbols for various support types
1.2 STABILITY AND DETERMINANCY
A structure is considered geometrically stable if for any incipient movement, due to any
conceivable system of applied loads, an elastic resistance to this movement is immediately
developed. A structure is considered statically determinate if the external reactions and the
internal member forces can be determined only by considering the equations of statical
equilibrium without any references to the elastic properties of the structural members.
A rigid planar structure can be acted upon by a general system of forces that can be
combined into a single force and a single moment. For statical stability and determinancy,
the number and arrangement of reactions must be such that they keep the external forces in
equilibrium. Since there are three equations of static equilibrium (  Fx = 0,  Fy = 0,  M
= 0) for planar structures, there must be three components of reactions, which are neither
parallel nor concurrent. If the components of reactions are less than three, the structure is
unstable. If the number of reaction components is three, and if those components are neither
parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and determinate. If the number of
reaction components is greater than three, and if the components are arranged such that they
are neither parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and statically
indeterminate. The degree of external indeterminancy is defined as the number of unknown
reactions in excess of the number of the available equations of statics plus the number of
equations of construction.
The conditions are summarized in the following criteria:
r < 3; structure is statically unstable externally
r = 3; structure is statically determinate externally
r > 3; structure is statically indeterminate externally
where r is the total number of unknown reaction components.
The preceding criteria must be applied with some discretion. If r < 3, the structure is
definitely unstable; however, in cases where r  3, the structure is not necessarily stable. It is
Ya
Xa
aXa
Ya
a
Ya
Xa
Ma
a
Ma
Xa
a
Statics of structures 3
o
o
Link
possible that the reaction components are not properly arranged to ensure external stability.
These structures category are geometrically unstable.
Figures 1.2 to 1.4 gives the statical classification of several structures. The simple beam
shown in Fig. 1.2a is unstable because the number of reaction components is less than three (r
= 2). Since the beam shown of Fig 1.2b has no reaction to equilibrate the horizontal component
of the applied loading, the structure will move horizontally if any horizontal load acts on the
beam. On the other hand, the structures shown in Figs. 1.2c and 1.2d have the supports
arranged so that the lines of action of all three reactions intersect at one point. So, the structures
shown in Figs. 1.2a to 1.2d are geometrically unstable. The structures shown in Figs. 1.3a to
1.3f have three reaction components that are neither parallel nor concurrent. Therefore, they
are stable and statically determinate. Finally, the structures shown in Figs 1.4a to 1.4c have
more than three reaction components. These reaction components are neither parallel nor
concurrent, so these structures are stable and statically indeterminate.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 1.2 Unstable structures
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 1.3 Stable and statically determinate structures
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 1.4 Stable and statically indeterminate structures
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.4
1.3 CONDITION EQUATIONS
Some structures incorporate unique internal features of construction that significantly
affect the behavior of the system and require special attention from the structural engineer.
For example, the beam shown in Fig. 1.5a has an internal hinge at b. This hinge results in no
bending moment transmission through the beam at point b. The free body diagrams for the
two beam segments ab and bc indicates that  Mb = 0 for the two individual free-body
diagrams. The one independent equation introduced by the condition of construction is
referred to as an equation of condition. For the intermediate roller of Fig. 1.5b, only the force
normal to the axes of the beams will be transmitted. This gives two equations of condition
since the force parallel to the longitudinal axis of the beam and the moment are both zero at
the roller.
Thus for a structure with c condition equations, the following criteria is applied:
r < 3 + c ; structure is statically unstable externally
r = 3 + c ; structure is statically determinate externally
r > 3 + c ; structure is statically indeterminate externally
(a) (b)
Fig. 1.4 Condition equations
The number of condition equations given by an intermediate hinge depends
on the number of sides that is connected by this hinge. Generally, the number
of condition equations c is given as
c = n – 1 ………………………………………………(1.1)
in which n is the number of sides which is connected with the hinge. For example, the hinge
given in Fig. 1.6a gives one condition equation because this hinge connects two sides. On the
other hand, the hinges shown in Figs 1.6b and 1.6c give two and three condition equations,
respectively.
(a) One condition equation
(b) Two condition equations (c) Three condition equations
Fig. 1.6 Number of condition equations given by intermediate hinge.
Hinge
a b c Roller
n = 2; c= 1 n = 2; c = 1n = 2; c = 1 n = 2; c = 1
n = 3; c= 2 n = 3; c= 2 n =4; c =3
Statics of structures 5
The frames that contain closed panels require an internal classification in addition to the
external classification. Each closed panel requires three internal condition equations to be
solved. Let e be the number of internal condition equations for a closed panel. Then, the
following condition prevail for each closed panel.
e > 3; structure is statically unstable internally
e = 3; structure is statically determinate internally
e < 3; structure is statically indeterminate internally
The stability of the frames that contain closed forms can also be determined by cutting the
structure more than one part and by determining the stability of each portion, the whole stability
of the structure is evaluated.
EXAMPLE 1.1
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 3
3 + c > r unstable
Structure (b)
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 5
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Structures (c) and (d)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
a b c
b'
a
b
c
r1 r2
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.6
For structure (c), the node b can moves a short distance perpendicular to the line ac without
any resistance of members ab or bc. Hence, the structural system (c) is geometrically unstable
since the shape of the structure can be altered without any change in length of any member.
The structure (c) is said to be the critical form. This situation does not exist in the stable
structure (d) since the two arcs r1 and r2 have no common tangent and any incipient movement
of b will generate an immediate resistant from the various parts of the structure.
EXAMPLE 1. 2
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
Structure (a) has no resistance against horizontal loads, so this structure is unstable
Structure (b)
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 4
3 + c > r unstable
Structure (c)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 5
3 + c < r stable and statically indeterminate to
the second degree
Statics of structures 7
EXAMPLE 1.3
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structures (a), (b), and (c)
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 5
3 + c = r
It is noticed that the part abc of the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is
unstable. On the other hand, structures (a) and (c) are stable and statically determinate.
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 5
3 + c > r unstable
EXAMPLE 1.4
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
a b c
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.8
a b
a
b
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structures (a), (b), and (c)
These structures are unstable because the reaction components are concurrent.
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 5
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 1.5
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Structure (b)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Statics of structures 9
a
b c
d
Structure (c)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a vertical component, so this part is unstable.
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 6
3 + c < r
The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a horizontal component, so this part is unstable.
EXAMPLE 1.6
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
e = 3 internally stable and statically determinate
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.10
a
b c
e = 3 e = 3
c
Structure (b)
The part abcd couldn’t resist any lateral loads. So the
structure is unstable. Another way for detecting the stability of
the structure by dividing it into two portions as shown in figure
and assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one. It
is noticed that the upper portion is stable and statically
determinate while part ab of the lower portion is unstable. So
the structure is unstable
Structure (c)
When the structure is divided into two portions and
assuming that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown
in figure. It is noticed that, portion bdef is stable and statically
determinate. On the other portion, part ahg is a critical form, so the
structure is unstable.
Structure (d)
When the structure is divided into two portions and assuming
that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in
figure. It is noticed that, each of the two portions is stable and
statically determinate. So, the structure is stbale and statically
determinate.
EXAMPLE 1.7
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
a
b
c
d
3 + c = 4
r = 4
a
b
b
d
e
f
f
gh
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
Statics of structures 11
e =3
e =3
Structures (a) and (b)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 6
3 + c = r
The part abc on the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is unstable. On the other
hand, structure (a) is stable and statically determinate.
Structure (c)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
external condition equation is given by hinge at c
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
It is also noticed that each closed form has three condition equations (e = 3 ), so the structure
is internally stable and statically determinate.
Structure (d)
When the structure is divided into two portions and
assuming that the upper portion carrying the lower one
as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each of the two
portions is stable and statically determinate. So, the
structure is stable and statically determinate.
EXAMPLE 1.8
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3 + c = 3; r = 3
3 + c = 5
r = 5
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.12
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
Since each closed form has three condition equations, then the structure is internally stable
and statically determinate
Structure (b)
Dividing the structure into three portions and assuming that each
portion resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that,
each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is
stable and statically determinate.
Structure (c)
3 + c = 3 + 4 = 7
r = 7
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 1.9
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 3
r = 3
Statics of structures 13
a
b c
e = 3
d
e
Structure (a)
Dividing the structure into three portions as shown in
figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically
determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically
determinate.
Structure (b)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 6
3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
Structure (c)
Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that the
upper portion carrying the lower one as shown in figure. It is
noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So,
the structure is stable and statically determinate.
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 7
3 + c < r stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree
EXAMPLE 1.10
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c)
(d)
SOLUTION
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 5
r = 5
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.14
a
b
Structure (a)
Dividing the structure into three portions as shown in
figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically
determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically
determinate.
Structure (b)
Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that
the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in figure.
It is noticed that, the lower portion is stable and statically
determinate while the upper portion is stable and statically
indeterminate to the second degree. By summing the two
portions once again, the structure is stable and statically
indeterminate to the second degree.
Structure (c)
Dividing the structure into two portions and
assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one as
shown in figure. It is noticed that, the upper portion is
stable and statically determinate while lower portion is
unstable. Then, the structure is unstable.
Structure (d)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
external condition equation is given by the hinge at d
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate.
e = 3 internally stable and statically determinate.
EXAMPLE 1.11
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 4
r = 4
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 5
r = 7
3 + c = 4
r = 3
3 + c = 4
r = 4
Statics of structures 15
a
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 5
3 + c > r unstable.
Structure (b)
3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6
r = 6
3 + c = r
In this structure, the column ab couldn’t resist any lateral loading, so the structure is unstable.
Structure (c)
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 3
(the condition equation is given by the hinge at a)
3 + c > r unstable.
It is noticed that the condition equation given by the hinge at a couldn’t be used to find the
additional reaction component. Moreover, the part abc couldn’t resist any lateral loading. So,
the structure is unstable
Structure (d)
Dividing the structure into two portions as shown in
figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically
determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically
determinate.
1.4 COMPUTATION OF REACTIONS
The equations of static equilibrium play a vital role in determining the reactions for any
structure. If the structure is statically determinate externally, these equations provide all whate
e = 3
3 + c = 3
r = 3
3 + c = 4
r = 4
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.16
is needed for the solution, whereas for statically indeterminate cases, the equations of
equilibrium remain applicable, but they are not sufficient for the solution.
In determining the reactions, a free-body diagram (FBD)of the entire structure is
constructed. All given forces are shown to act in their prescribed direction, and each unknown
reaction component is assumed to act in a specified direction. The equations of static
equilibrium are applied in consistency with the assumed directions, and these equations are
solved for the unknown reactions. If the solution yields a positive reaction component, then
the assumed direction is correct, whereas a negative result indicates that the opposite direction
is correct. In the latter case, care must be exercised in subsequent calculations. If the negative
sign is retained, then the originally assumed direction must also be retained. However, the
direction can be reversed on the free-body diagram and a positive sign can then be used in
subsequent steps.
EXAMPLE 1.12
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The reaction at b has two unknown components, whereas the reaction at point e has only a
single unknown component as shown in the figure.
Determination of Reactions
 Px = 0: (→+) Xb = 0
 Me = 0: Yb  9 – 20  12 – 50  6 – 30  4 = 0
Yb = 73.3 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yb – 20 – 50 –30 = 0
Ye + 73.3 – 20 – 50 –30 = 0
Ye = 26.7 kN
The positive sign indicates that the reaction components act in the assumed direction on the
free-body diagram.
20 kN 50 kN 30 kN
Yb Ye
Xb
b e
a b
dc
3 m 4 m
20 kN 50 kN 30 kN
3 m 2 m
e
Statics of structures 17
EXAMPLE 1.13
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The distributed load is replaced by a resultant concentrated force applied at its centroidal
position. The unknown reaction components are also shown.
Determination of Reactions
 Px = 0: (→+) Xd = 0
 Md = 0: Ya  6 – 60  5 + 60 = 0
Ya = 40 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yd + Ya – 60 = 0
Yd + 40 – 60 = 0
Yd = 20 kN
EXAMPLE 1.14
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The inclined force is shown resolved into two components.
60 kN.m
60 kN
Ya
Yd
1m
a
Xdd
40 kN
Xa
Ya Ye
48 kN
36 kN
50 kN
a
e
2.5 m
a
b
d
c
3 m 2 m 1 m
60 kN.m
40 kN/m
4
3 fed
a
b
2 m 3 m
60 kN40 kN 10 kN/m
2 m3 m 1 m
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.18
Determination of Reactions
 Px = 0: (→+) – Xd + 36 = 0
Xd = 36 kN
 Me = 0: Ya  8 – 40  5 – 48  2 + 50  0.5 = 0
Ya = 33.9 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0
Ye + 33.9 – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0
Ye = 104.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.15
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The structure is separated into three separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and
internal forces at the hinges are shown in the figure.
Determination of Reactions
Free body ce
The free body diagram ce is treated as a simply supported beam and thus inherently use the
equilibrium conditions. The reactions (internal forces transferred at hinges) are
Xc = Xe = 0 ; Yc = Ye = 7.5 kN
Free body abc
 Px = 0: (→+) Xa = 0
15 kN
10 kN 15 kN
Ya Y b
Y f Yi
Xa
Yc
Ye
Xc Xe
Xc Xe
40 kN
4m
a b c e
f i
c e
b
2
f i
hgedc
2 3 m
15 kN 10 kN 15 kN
5 kN/m
6 m
a
2 2 2 2
Statics of structures 19
 Mb = 0: Ya  6 – 40  2 + Yc  2 = 0
Ya  6 – 40  2 + 7.5  2 = 0
Ya = 10.8 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yb + Ya – Yc – 40 = 0
Yb + 10.8 – 7.5 – 40 = 0
Yb = 36.7 kN
Free body efi
 Mi = 0: Yf  7 – Ye  9 – 10  5 – 15  2 = 0
Yf  7 – 7.5  9 – 10  5 – 15  2 = 0
Yf = 21.1 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yi + Yf – Ye – 10 –15 = 0
Yi + 21.1 – 7.5 – 10 –15 = 0
Yi = 11.4 kN
EXAMPLE 1.16
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The structure is broken into two separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and internal
forces at the hinge are shown in figure.
Determination of Reactions
Free body def
 Px = 0: (→+) Xd – 20 = 0
Xd = 20 kN
 Me = 0: Yd  5 + 40  2 – 37.5  1.67 = 0
40 kN
40 kN
20 kN
Y a
Xc
Yc
Y e
40 kN
Yd
Xd
Xd
a
c
d
d
e
37.5 kN
2m
1.67m
f
a
10 kN/m
d
f
e
b
c
4 m 4 m 5 m 2 m
40 kN 40 kN
20 kN
15 kN/m
1
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.20
Yd = – 3.5 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yd – 37.5 – 40 = 0
Ye – 3.5 – 37.5 – 40 = 0
Ye = 81 kN
Free body acd
 Px = 0: (→+) Xc – Xd = 0
Xc – 20 = 0
Xc = 20 kN
 Mc = 0: Ya  8 + Yd  1 – 40  6 – 40  4 = 0
Ya  8 –3.5  1 – 40  6 – 40  4 = 0
Ya = 50.4 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yc + Ya – Yd – 40 – 40 = 0
Yc + 50.4 + 3.5 – 40 – 40 = 0
Yc = 26.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.17
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The reactions of the link members are shown in their components that are function of the force
in the link member and the inclination of the link.
2.83
2.83
2/2.83 F e
40 kN.m 20 kN
Ya
2/2.83 F e
a c
e
2/2.83 F d
2/2.83 F d
Fd
Fe
d
f
2
2
2
2
b
20 kN
3 m 2 m 2 m
2 m
2 m40 kN.m
a c
d
e
f
Statics of structures 21
Determination of Reactions
 Mc = 0: Ya  5 + 20  2 – 40 = 0
Ya = 0
 Me = 0: 2/2.83 Fd  4 – 40 = 0
Fd = 14.1 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) – 2/2.83 Fe + 2/2.83 Fd = 0
Fe = Fd
Fe = 14.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.18
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
Free body diagram
Determination of Reactions
 Mf = 0: 4/4.47 Fa  10 + 40 – 60  8 = 0
Fa = 49.2 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) – Xf + 2/4.47 Fa = 0
– Xf + 2/4.47  49.2 = 0
Xf = 22 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yf + 4/4.47 Fa – 60 – 120 = 0
Yf + 4/4.47  49.2 – 60 – 120 = 0
Yf = 136 kN
2 m 5 m 3 m 3 m
4 m
40 kN.m 60 kN 20 kN/m
a
bc d e
f
40 kN.m 60 kN
2/4.47 F a
4/4.47 F a
Xf
Yf
Fa
a
b
d
120 kN 3 m
f
2
4
4.47
4
3
5
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.22
EXAMPLE 1.19
Calculate the reactions for the frame shown.
SOLUTION
Free body diagram
Determination of Reactions
 Px = 0: (→+) Xa – 30 – 10 = 0
Xa = 40 kN
 Mf = 0: Ya  10 – 20  12 – 72  7 – 30  5.5 – 10  4= 0
Ya = 94.9 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yf + Ya – 20 – 72 = 0
Yf + 94.9 – 20 – 72 = 0
Yf = – 2.9 kN
EXAMPLE 1.20
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
2 m 6 m 4 m
4 m
1.5 m
10 kN
20 kN 30 kN12 kN/m on Hal
a
bc
d
e
f
1.5 m
10 kN
20 kN 30 kN
Xa
Ya
Yf
fa
72 kN
3 m
1 m
4 m
15 kN 50 kN
10kN/m
a
b c
d
3 m 3 m
Statics of structures 23
Free-Body Diagram
Determination of Reactions
 Mc (left)= 0: Yb  6 – 15  7 – 50  3 = 0
Yb = 42.5 kN
 Mc (bottom)= 0: Xd  4 – 40  2= 0
Xd = 20 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yd + Yb – 15 – 50 = 0
Yd + 42.5 – 15 – 50 = 0
Yd = 22.5 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) Xb + Xd – 40 = 0
Xb + 20 – 40 = 0
Xb = 20 kN
EXAMPLE 1.21
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
Free body diagram
15 kN 50 kN
40 kN
Xb
Yb
Xd
Yd
2 m
b
c
d
 Mc (left) = 0
 Mc (bottom) = 0
2 m 4 m
1 m
4 m
20 kN
15 kN/m 18 kN/m
a
b c d
e
20 kN
60 kN
Xa
Ya
Xe
Ye
36 kN
8/3
2 m
30 kN
1 m
a
e
c
 Mc (left) = 0
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.24
Determination of Reactions
 Mc (left)= 0: Ya  2 – Xa  5 – 30  1 = 0 ……………………….………(a)
 Me = 0: Ya  6 – Xa  1 + 20  4 – (15  6)  3 – 36  8/3 = 0 ……(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Xa = 14 kN; Ya = 50 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – (15  6) = 0
Ye = 40 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) – Xe + Xa + 20 – 36 = 0
Xe = – 2 kN
EXAMPLE 1.22
Calculate the reactions for the frame shown.
SOLUTION
Free body diagram
Determination of Reactions
 Me (bottom)= 0: Xg  6 + 80  3 = 0
Xg = – 40 kN
 Md (right)= 0: Yg  6 – Xg  9 - 80  6 – 35  8 – 53.67  3 = 0
Yg  6 + 40  9 – 80  6 – 35  8– 53.67  3 = 0
Yg = 93.5 kN
2 m 6 m 2 m
3 m
20 kN
30 kN
35 kN
40 kN
80 kN
8 kN/m
3 m 3 m
3 m
3 m
a
b
c
d
e f
g
20 kN
30 kN
35 kN
40 kN
80 kN
Xa
Ya
Ma
Xg
Yg
a
e
g
d
53.67 kN
3 m
 Me (bottom)
= 0
 Md (right) = 0
Statics of structures 25
 Ma = 0: Ma – Yg  12 – 80  3 – 35  8 +35  14 + 53.67  9+ 30  6 +
40  3 – 20  2 = 0
Mg = 129 kN.m
 Py = 0: (+) Ya + Yg – 20 – 40 –30 – 53.67 – 35 = 0
Ya = 85.2 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) Xa – Xg – 80 = 0
Xa = 40 kN
EXAMPLE 1.23
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
Determination of Reactions
Free Body defg
 Mo = 0: 2/3.61 Fcf  4.5 – 3/3.61 Fcf  7 + 30  3 + 40  7 – 15  4.5 = 0
Fcf = 90.9 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) – 2/3.61 Fbe + 2/3.61 Fcf – 15 = 0
– 2/3.61 Fbe + 2/3.61  90.9 – 15 = 0
Fbe = 63.9 kN
3 m 2 m 2 m 2 m
3 m
30 kN 40 kN
15 kN
8 kN/m
a b c
d e f
g
3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf
2/3.61Fcf2/3.61Fbe
e f
2/3.61Fbe
3/3.61Fbe
2/3.61Fcf
3/3.61Fcf
b c
2
3
3.61
30 kN 40 kN
15 kN
40 kN
Yd
Xa
Ya
Ma
3/3.61Fcf
2/3.61Fcf
3/3.61Fbe
2/3.61Fbe
a
d
e f
b c
2/3.61Fbe
3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf
2/3.61Fcf
g
o
4.5m
2.5 m
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.26
 Py = 0: (+) Yd + 3/3.61 Fcf – 3/3.61 Fbe – 30 – 40 = 0
Yd + 3/3.61  90.9 – 3/3.61  64 – 30 – 40 = 0
Yd = 47.5 kN
Free Body abc
 Ma = 0: Ma – 40  2.5 + 3/3.61 Fbe  5 – 3/3.61 Fcf  9 = 0
Ma – 40  2.5 + 3/3.61  64  5 – 3/3.61  90.9  9 = 0
Ma = 515 kN.m
 Px = 0: (→+) Xa + 2/3.61 Fbe – 2/3.61 Fcf = 0
Xa + 2/3.61  64 – 2/3.61  90.9 = 0
Xa = 15 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Ya – 40 + 3/3.61  Fbe – 3/3.61  Fbe = 0
Ya + 40 + 3/3.61  64 – 3/3.61  90.9 = 0
Ya = 62.5 kN
EXAMPLE 1.24
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown.
SOLUTION
Free body diagram
Determination of Reactions
 Mi (right)= 0: Yk  4 – 48  2 = 0
Ya = 24 kN
 Mh = 0: Ya  9 – 15  11 – (8  9)  4.5 – 10  7 + 10  2 + 48  4
– Yk  6 = 0
Ya  9 – 15  11 – (8  9)  4.5 – 10  7 + 10  2 + 48  4
– 24  6 = 0
Ya = 54.6 kN
2 m 3 m 6 m 2 m 4 m
4 m
3 m
15 kN 10 kN
10 kN
8 kN/m
12 kN/m
a
bc
d e f
g
h
i
j
k
15 kN 10 kN
10 kN
48 kN
Xa
Ya Yk
Xh
Yh
a h
i
k
48 kN
2m
24 kN
e
1.5m
3m
 Mi (right) = 0
 Me (left) = 0
Statics of structures 27
 Me (left)= 0: Xa  7 – Ya  3 + 15  5 + 24  1.5 = 0
Xa  7 – 54.6  3 + 15  5 + 24  1.5 = 0
Xa = 7.5 kN
 Px = 0: (→+) – Xh + Xa – 10 = 0
– Xh + 7.5 – 10 = 0
Xh = – 2.5 kN
 Py = 0: (+) Yh + Ya + Yk – 15 – (8  9) – 10 – 48 = 0
Yh + 54.6 + 24 – 15 – (8  9) – 10 – 48 = 0
Yh = 66.4 kN
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.28
a
b
c d e f
2 m 2 m 2 m 4 m 2 m
20 kN
30 kN.m
15 kN/m1
1 a
b c d
1.5 m 2.0 m
30 kN 40 kN
15 kN/m
e
1.5 m 1.5 m
Problems
Calculate the reactions for the following structures:
(1) (2)
(3) (4)
(5) (6)
(7) (8)
(9) (10)
10 kN/m
a c
b
7 m 3 m
20 kN
1
2
6 kN/m
a
b
5 m 2 m
c
b
f
ged
c
3 m 3 m
20 kN 30 kN
8 kN/m
6 m 5 m 2 m 2 m
a
bc
d
1 m 4 m
2 m
10 kN
8 kN/m
2 m6 m 3 m
3 m
40 kN.m
40 kN
10 kN/m
a b
c
d e f
2 m
a b
c
d
3 m 2 m 4 m
3 m
40 kN
10 kN/m
20 kN
3 m
f
e
20 kN
a
b
c d
e
2 m 4 m
2.5 m
40 kN
60 kN
20 kN/m
2.5 m
3 m 3 m 4 m
a
b c d
e
f
g
1.5 m 5 m 3 m 2 m
6 m
60 kN
80 kN
30 kN/m
Statics of structures 29
(11) (12)
(13) (14)
(15) (16)
(17) (18)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
3 m 4 m 3 m 4 m 2 m
4 m
30 kN.m
20 kN
20 kN
10 kN/m
a
b
c
d
e
2 m 4 m
2 m
2 m
40 kN
20 kN/m
10kN/m
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
6 m 2 m 4 m 2 m
4 m
15 kN
60 kN 30 kN/m
20 kN
a
bc
d
e f
g
h
i
1 m 8 m 2 m
2 m
2 m
2 m
30 kN
20 kN/m
10kN/m
20 kN
1 m
4 m
20 kN
10kN/m
a
b
c
d
2 m 4 m
10 kN/m
e
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
3 m 2 m 4 m 2 m
4 m
60 kN 30 kN/m
20 kN
3 m
2 m 6 m 4 m
4 m
20 kN 30 kN20 kN/m on Hal
a
bc
d
e
f
1.5 m
1.5 m10 kN
a
b c
d
e
f
3 m 3 m 2 m
4 m
25 kN
20 kN/m
3 m
Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.30
(19) (20)
2 m 4 m 3 m
2 m
3 m
3 m
20 kN 20 kN
90 kN 20 kN
/m
a
b
cd
e
f g
h
i
1.5 1.5 a b
c d
e
f g
h
i
j
3 m 3 m
1.5 m
2 m
2 m
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
20 kN/m
1.5 m
2
Statically Determinate Trsses
2.1 Introduction
Trusses consist of straight members joined together at their ends by joints assumed
incapable of resisting any moment, that is, frictionless pins. However, the joints of actual
trusses used in construction do possess a certain amount of rigidity leading to a certain amount
of restraint rotation. The assumption of joints behaving as frictionless pins greatly simplifies
the analysis of a truss. Furthermore, extensive theoretical and experimental investigations
indicate that the error introduced by this assumption is insignificant when loaded at their joints.
To avoid eccentricity at joints, the centroidal axis of each member is straight and coincides
with the line connecting the joint centers at all ends of the members. Simple analysis of an
idealized truss results in purely axial forces in the members of the truss that is either tensile or
compressive.
2.2 TRUSSES CONFIGURATION
The simplest form of a stable planar truss is a triangle arrangement of three members as
shown in Fig. 2.1a. Each additional joint can be obtained by adding two bars to the joints
already formed. Such a truss is called a simple truss. These trusses are always composed of
triangular shapes as shown in Figs. 2.1a and 2.1b.
(a) (b) (c)
Fig. 2.1 Examples of simple trusses
A compound truss consists of two or more simple trusses joined so that relative motion of
the components is constrained. Three conditions of connectivity are required to prevent
relative translation and rotation. Two simple plane trusses are combined together by three
nonparallel nonconcurrent bars to form a compound truss as shown in Fig. 2.2a. Since two
a b
c
a b
c
d
e
a b
c
d
e
f
32 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
bars can be replaced by a common hinge, a compound truss can also be formed by joining
together two plane trusses with a common hinge and bar, as shown in Figs. 2.2b and 2.2c.
Trusses that cannot be classified as either simple or compound are called complex trusses as
shown in Fig.2.2d.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 2.2 Compound and complex trusses
2.3 CONDITION EQUATIONS
As discussed in Chapter 1, three independent reaction components can be determined for
a planar system through the systematic application of the equations of static equilibrium.
Additional reaction components can be determined if there are internal conditions that permit
the expression of special condition equations. In the case of truss structures, the conditions
might take a number of forms.
The structure of Fig. 2.3a is a statically determinate stable truss, and the three reaction
components can be determined from statics. If an additional part dc is added to truss ab, then
an additional condition is required to evaluate the additional reaction component at c. This
condition, which is Md = 0 for the left or right portion of the truss, is provided from the
connected hinge at d.
If an additional reaction component is added to point d, as shown in Fig. 2.3c, the
intermediate hinge at e provides an additional condition to allow the determination of the
additional reaction component.
The absence of diagonal member in a truss panel, under proper support conditions,
introduces a condition as shown in Fig. 2.3d. In this case, a section through panel bc reveals
that no vertical force component can be transferred through this panel. This condition, coupled
with the overall equations of equilibrium, enables one to determine the reaction components.
a
b c
d
e f
Hinge
b c
a
Statically determinate trusses 33
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 2.3. Condition equations for trusses
2.4 STABILITY AND DETERMINANCY
Based on the forgoing discussion, criteria can be developed concerning the statical
determinancy of truss structures. First, the truss can be checked for external determinancy and
stability according to the criteria developed in Chapter 1. In which, if r is taken as the actual
number of reaction components and c is the number of condition equations, then the following
criteria can be:
r < 3 + c; truss is unstable externally
r = 3 + c; truss is statically determinate externally
r > 3 + c; truss is statically indeterminate externally
These conditions are necessary but not sufficient conditions for statical classification. The
condition equations should be properly added to enable the determination of the additional
reaction components.
For internal classification, in addition to the above definition for r and c, let m be the total
number of bars and j the total number of joints. Then, the following conditions prevail:
m + c + 3 < 2j; truss is unstable internally
m + c + 3 = 2j; truss is statically determinate internally
m + c + 3 > 2j; truss is statically indeterminate internally
where c + 3 is the minimum required components of reactions. Care must be exercised in using
the above conditions. If m + c + 3 < 2j, the truss is definitely unstable, but if m + c + 3  2j, it
doesn’t necessarily follow that the truss is stable. It is possible that m bars are not properly
arranged to ensure internal stability. Such trusses are said to have critical form.
a b a b c
d
a
b c
d
e
a c
b e
34 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.1
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 +3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Trusses 2, 3, and 4
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 +3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j
Although the stability conditions are theoretically satisfied for Trusses 2, 3, and 4, Truss 2 is
geometrically unstable because it has a critical form. In this form, point b can move
perpendicular to line ac without any resistance. Also, the intermediate hinge at b couldn’t be
used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at c. On the other hand Trusses 3 and 4
are stable and statically determinate.
EXAMPLE 2.2
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
a
b
c
d e
a
b
c
d e
a
b
c
d e
a b c
d e
a
b
c
d
e
f
a
b
c
d
e
f
Statically determinate trusses 35
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 +3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Trusses 2, 3, and 4
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 +3 =
12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j
Studying the condition equations of trusses 2, 3, and 4 leads to the following conclusion:
Condition equation
of Truss 2
Condition equation
of Truss 3
Condition equation
of Truss 4
The additional horizontal reaction at support a can only be determined from the condition
equation of Truss 3, so, Truss 3 is stable and statically determinate while Trusses 2 and 4 are
unstable.
a
b
c
d
e
f
a
b
c
d
e
f
a
b
c
 Fy = 0
a
b
co
 Mo = 0
a
b
c
o
 Mo = 0
36 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.3
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1
Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 3
3 + c > r externally unstable
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 5
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 2 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
 Me= 0
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
 Me= 0
a
b
c
d
f
g
h
i
 Mc= 0,  Mg= 0
Statically determinate trusses 37
EXAMPLE 2.4
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 3
3 + c > r geometrically unstable
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 1 + 3 = 13
2j = 12
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first
degree
Trusses 3 and 4
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate
EXAMPLE 2.5
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
a b
c
d
e f
 Fx = 0
a b
c
d
e
f
 Fx = 0
a b
c
d
e f
a b
c
d
e f
a
b
c
d
e
 Mc = 0
a
b
c
d
e
 Md
= 0
38 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Trusses 1 and 2
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
m + c + 3 = 7 + 1 + 3 = 11
2j = 10
m + c + 3 > 2j internally statically indeterminate to the first degree
Although m, c, r, and j are the same for the two trusses, Truss 1 is unstable because its
geometry produces a critical form. In this case, small movement of node c can occur
perpendicular to the line ae without any resistance and also the condition equation at c couldn’t
be used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at e. On the other hand, Truss 2 is stable
and internally indeterminate to the first degree.
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 + 3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 + 3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.6
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
a
b
c
d
e a
b
c
d
e Mb = 0
Statically determinate trusses 39
Truss 3
Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 5 + 0 + 3 = 8
2j = 8
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 8
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
40 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.7
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18
2j = 18
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 4
3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 16 + 0 + 3 = 19
2j = 18
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 4
a
 Ma = 0 a
b
c
d e
f
 Mb = 0 determinate
Statically determinate trusses 41
3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to
the first degree
m + c + 3 = 10 + 0 + 3 = 13
2j = 12
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to
the first degree
EXAMPLE 2.8
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 + 3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 26 + 0 + 3 = 29
2j = 28
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
a Ma = 0
42 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 17 + 0 + 3 = 20
2j = 20
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.9
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 15 + 0 + 3 = 18
2j = 20
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r
m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18
2j = 18
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate
It is noticed that the condition equation  Fy = 0 at the shown vertical section is useful for
determining the additional reaction component at c. On the other hand, the static equations (
 Fy = 0
a
b c
o
 Mo = 0
Statically determinate trusses 43
Fx = 0,  Fy = 0,  M = 0) couldn’t be used to determine the vertical reaction at a or b because
the line of action of vertical reaction at b passes through support a. For this reason, the truss is
unstable.
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 4
3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 + 3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 1 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
EXAMPLE 2.10
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1
Truss 2
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5
r = 5
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 23 + 2 + 3 = 28
2j = 28
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
a
b
c
d
e
 Md = 0,  Me = 0
a
 Ma = 0
44 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
It should be noticed that the reaction components at b could be analyzed as internal forces in
members ba and bc by the method of joint. This is necessary to activate the first condition
equation ( Md (left) = 0).
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 4
3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 21 + 0 + 3 = 24
2j = 24
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 0 + 3 = 14
2j = 14
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4
r = 4
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 10 + 1 + 3 = 14
2j = 14
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.11
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1
Truss 2
Truss 3
Truss 4
SOLUTION
a
Statically determinate trusses 45
Truss 1
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22
2j = 20
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
second degree.
Truss 2
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 14
m + c + 3 < 2j unstable
Truss 3
3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3
r = 3
3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22
2j = 22
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate.
Truss 4
In this truss, it is noticed that the lines of action of all reactions intersect at point a. So, the
truss is geometrically unstable.
2.5 METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF SIMPLE
AND COMPOUND TRUSSES
Three methods of analysis that are most common for simple and compound trusses.
These are the method of joints, method of sections, and graphical method. The method of
joints and the graphical method are useful when the forces in all or in the majority of the truss
members are required, whereas the method of sections is more convenient if the forces in few
members of the truss are required. Sometimes a combination of the method of section with
the other two methods is useful, especially in the analysis of compound trusses. In some
trusses, the use of the method of section is required for determining some member forces
before using the other two methods.
2.6 METHOD OF JOINTS
The method of joints is frequently a simple way of analyzing a statically determinate truss.
In common cases, the unknown reactions can be first determined by taking the entire truss as a
46 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
free body. Next, the joints containing only two unknown member forces are analyzed using
their free body diagrams. The two equations of static equilibrium involving summation of
forces in two orthogonal directions are applied to determine the two unknown member forces
at the joint. The procedure continues until all internal axial forces are computed. Since, the
total number of joint equations of equilibrium is more than the number of unknown member
forces, there will be surplus equations for checking purposes after member axial forces have
been obtained.
A number of frequently occurring special conditions can be used to shorten the calculation.
These conditions are summarized in the following rules:
Rule 1
With reference to Joint a, it should be noticed that members ab and ac are in
the same direction. Since the joint is not loaded, it can be concluded that the
force in the third member ad is zero (Fad = 0) and Fab = Fac. This fact can be
verified by constructing the free-body diagram for joint a and summing the
forces first in the vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction.
Rule 2
With reference to the unloaded Joint e which has only two members, it can be
concluded that the forces in the two members are equal to zero (Fef = 0, Feg =
0 ). This fact can be verified by summing the forces in the vertical and
horizontal directions, respectively.
Rule 3
For Joint k, the forces in opposite members must be equal; that is, Fkl = Fkm
and Fkn = Fko. This can be demonstrated by summing the forces first in the
vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction
Example 2.12
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of
joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symetry: Ya = Yb = 40/2 = 20 kN
 Fx = 0: Xa = 0
a
Fab
Fad
Fac
e
Fef
Feg
k
Fkl
Fkn
Fkm
Fko
1.5 m 1.5 m
4 m
2 m
40 kN
a b
dc
e
1.5
2
2.5
3
4
5
40 kN
Ya=20 kN Yb=20 kN
a
b
c d
e
Xa =0
Statically determinate trusses 47
Joint e
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
1.5/2.5 Fde – 1.5/2.5 Fce = 0 ………….(a)
2/2.5 Fde + 2/2.5 Fce + 40 = 0 ………..(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fce = – 25kN , Fde = – 25 kN
Joint c
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
From symmetry:
3/5 Fbc – 1.5/2.5  25 = 0
Fbc = 25 kN
Fac + 4/5 Fbc + 2/2.5  25 = 0
Fac + 4/5 25 + 2/2.5 25 = 0
Fac = – 40 kN
Fad = Fbc = 25 kN
Fbd = Fac = – 40 kN
Joint a
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy (+):
Fab + 3/5 25 = 0
Fab = – 15 kN
40 – 4/5 25 – 20 = 0 ……………….(Check)
Member forces
40 kN
e
Fce
Fde
c
Fbc
Fac
Fce = 25
a
Fac
= 40
20 kN
Fab
Fad = 25
40 kN
-15
-40
2525
-40
-25
-25
20 kN 20 kN
48 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Example 2.13
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using
the method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
Xa  9 – 40 6 –20 12 = 0
Xa = 53.3 kN
– Xb + Xa = 0
– Xb + 53.3 = 0
Xb = 53.3 kN
Yb – 40 – 20 = 0
Yb = 60 kN
Joint e
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
4.5/7.5 Fde – 20 = 0
Fde = 33.3 kN
– Fce - 6/7.5 Fde = 0
– Fce – 6/7.5  33.3 = 0
Fce = – 26.7 kN
Joint c
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
Fcd – 40 = 0
Fcd = 40 kN
– Fac – 26.7 = 0
Fac = – 26.7 kN
Joint d
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
4.5/7.5 Fbd – 4.5/7.5 Fad – 40
– 4.5/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……………………(a)
– 6/7.5 Fbd – 6/7.5 Fad
+ 6/7.5  33.3 = 0 ………………..….…(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fbd = 66.7 kN ; Fad = – 33.3 kN
6 m 6 m
4.5 m
4.5 m
40 kN 20 kN
a
b
d
c
e
6
4.57.5
6
7.54.5
40 kN 20 kNXa=53.3 kN
Xb =
53.3 kN
Yb=60 kN
a
c
e
d
b
20 kN
Fce
Fde
e
40 kN
c
26.7Fac
Fcd
d
33.3
40
Fad
Fbd
Statically determinate trusses 49
Joint b
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
– Fab – 4.5/7.5  66.7 + 60 = 0
Fab = 20 kN
6/7.5  66.7 – 53.3 = 0 …………(Check)
Joint a
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
20 – 4.5/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……………(Check)
53.3 – 26.7 - 6/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……..(Check)
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.14
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the
method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
Ya  6 – 50 3 = 0
Ya = 25 kN
Yb – Ya – 50 = 0
Yb – 25 – 50 = 0
Yb = 75 kN
Xa = 0
53.3 kN
60 kN
66.7
Fab
b
53.3 kN
33.3
a
20
26.7
40 kN 20 kN
-26.7
-33.3
20
-26.7
40
33.3
66.7
53.3 kN
53.3 kN
60 kN
1.5 1.5 3 m 3 m
3 m
3 m
3 m
f g
h
b
d
c
e
50 kN
a
3
3
4.24
1.5
3
3.35
3
4.5
5.41
50 kN
Ya
=25 kN Yb= 75 kN
Xa
=0
a b
c d
e
f
g
h
50 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Joint g
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
3/4.24 Fgh – 50 = 0
Fgh = 70.7 kN
– Ffg – 3/4.24 Fgh = 0
– Ffg – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0
Ffg = – 50 kN
Joint h
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– 3/4.24 Feh + 3/4.24  70.7 = 0
Feh = 70.7 kN
– Ffh – 3/4.24 Feh – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0
– Ffh – 3/4.24  70.7 – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0
Ffh = – 100 kN
Joint f
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– Fef – 50 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN
– Fdf – 100 = 0
Fdf = – 100 kN
Joint e
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– 1.5/3.35 Fce + 3/4.24 Fde + 3/4.2470.7
– 50 = 0 ……………………………………..(a)
– 3/3.35 Fce – 3/4.24 Fde
+ 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 ……………………..….(b)
Solving (a), (b),
Fce = 37.3 kN ; Fde = 23.6 kN
Joint d
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– Fcd – 3/4.243  23.6 = 0
Fcd = – 16.7 kN
– Fbd – 100 + 3/4.24  23.6 = 0
Fbd = – 83.3 kN
Joint c
50 kN
gFfg
Fhg
h
70.7
Ffh
Feh
f
100
50
Fef
Fdf
e
70.7
50
Fde
Fce
d
10023.6
Fbd
Fcd
Statically determinate trusses 51
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
4.5/5.41 Fbc – 1.5/3.35 Fac + 1.5/3.35  37.3
– 16.7 = 0 …………………………………..(a)
– 3/5.41 Fbc – 3/3.35 Fac + 3/3.35  37.3 = 0
……………………………..…………..……(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fbc = 15 kN ; Fac = 28 kN
Joint b
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– Fab – 4.5/5.41  15 = 0
Fab = –12.5 kN
75 +3/5.41  15 – 83.3 = 0 ……….(Check)
Joint a
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
1.5/3.35  28 – 12.5 = 0 ………….(Check)
3/3.35  28 – 25 = 0 ………………(Check)
Member forces
Example 2.15
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using
the method of joints.
SOLUTION
c
37.3
16.7
FbcFac
b
83.3
75 kN
15
Fab
a 12.5
28
25 kN
50 kN
-12.5
28
15
-83.3
-16.7
37.3
23.6
-100
-50
70.7
-50
-100
70.7
25 kN 75 kN
3 m 4 m 3 m
3 m
3 m
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN 10 kN
f
a b
d
c
e
6
4
7.21
3
3
4.24
52 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Determination of Reactions
 Mb :
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
Ya  4 + 10  (3 – 7 + 6 – 4)= 0
Ya = 5 kN
Yb + Ya – 10 – 10 – 10 = 0
Yb + 5 – 10 – 10 –10 = 0
Yb = 25 kN
– Xa + 10 +10 = 0
Xa = 20 kN
Joint c
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
3/4.24 Fcd + 3/4.24 Fac + 10 = 0 ……………(a)
3/4.24 Fcd – 3/4.24 Fac – 10 = 0 …………….(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fcd = 0 ; Fac = – 14.1 kN
Joint f
According to rule 2; Fef = Fbf = 0
Joint e
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
Fde = 0
– Fbe – 10 = 0
Fbe = – 10 kN
Joint d
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
4/7.21 Fbd + 10 = 0
Fbd = – 18 kN
– Fad – 6/7.21 Fbd – 10 = 0
Fad = 5 kN
Joint b
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– Fab + 4/7.21  18 = 0
Fab = – 10 kN
25 – 10 – 6/7.21  18 = 0 ……….(Check)
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN 10 kN
Xa =20 kN
Ya=5 kN Yb=25 kN
c
a b
f
e
d
10 kN c
10 kN
Fcd
Fac
Fef
f
Fbf
e
10 kN
0
Fbe
Fde
d
10 kN
10 kN 0
0 Fbd
Fad
b
10
018
Fab
25 kN
Statically determinate trusses 53
Joint a
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
10 + 3/4.24  14.1 – 20 = 0 ………(Check)
5 + 5 – 3/4.24  14.1 = 0 …………(Check)
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.16
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown
truss using the method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Me (left) = 0:
 Fx = 0:
Ya = Yi = 100 kN
Xa  14 + 100  10 – Ya  20 = 0
Xa = 71.4 kN
Xi = Xa = 71.4 kN
Joint a
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
10/11.18 Fab + 71.4 = 0
Fab = – 79.9 kN
Fac + 5/11.18 Fab + 100 = 0
Fac – 5/11.18  79.9 + 100 = 0
Fac = – 64.3 kN
a
20 kN
514.1
5 kN
10
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN 10 kN
10
-14.1
5
-18
-10
20 kN
5 kN 25 kN
0
0
0
0
10.2
10
13.45
11.1 8
4 at 10 m = 40m
5 m
5 m
2 m
2 m
100 kN 100 kN
f
g
h
ia
b
d
c
e
5
10
9
10
2
5
10
11.1 8
100 kN 100 kN
Xa =71.4
Ya=100 kN
Xi=71.4
Yi=100 kN
a
b
c
d
e
g
h
f
i
a
100 kN
71.4 kN
Fac
Fab
54 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Joint c
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
10/11.18 Fbc + 10/10.2 Fcd = 0 ……….(a)
– 5/11.18 Fbc + 2/10.2 Fcd + 64.3 = 0 .(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fbc = 102.7 kN , Fcd = – 93.7 kN
Joint d
According to Rule 3: Fbd = – 100 kN , Fde = – 93.7 kN
Joint b
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy (+):
10/13.45 Fbe + 10/11.18  79.9
– 10/11.18  102.7 = 0
Fbe = 27.5 kN
9/13.45 Fbe + 5/11.18  79.9 + 5/11.18  102.7
– 100
= 9/13.45  27.5 + 5/11.18  79.9
+ 5/11.18  102.7 – 100 = 0 ………….(Check)
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.17
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the
method of joints.
SOLUTION
c
Fcd
Fbc
64.3
d
Fde
Fbd
100 kN
93.7
b
100
79.9
102.7
Fbe
100 kN 100 kN
-79. 9
-64.3
-7 9.9
-64.3
1 02.7
-100
27.5
102.7
-100
27.5
-93.7 -93.7
-93.7 -93.7
71.4 kN
100 kN
71.4 kN
100 kN
4 11.31
8.94
4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m
8 m
8 m
100 kN
f
g
h
a
b
c
ed
8 8
8
Statically determinate trusses 55
Determination of Reactions
From Symmetry:
 Fx (→+):
Ya = Yc = 100/2 = 50 kN
Xa = 0
Joint f
According to Rule 2: Ffg = Fdf = 0
Joint g
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy = 0 (+):
– 8/11.31 Fdg + 8/11.31 Feg = 0 …………..(a)
– 8/11.31 Fdg – 8/11.31 Feg – 100 = 0 …….(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Fdg = Feg = – 70.7 kN
Joint a
 Fy = 0 (+):
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
8/8.94 Fad + 50 = 0
Fad = – 55.9 kN
Fab – 4/8.94 Fad = 0
Fab + 4/8.94  55.9 = 0
Fab = – 25 kN
Joint b
According to rule 1: Fbd = Fbe = 0

Joint d
 Fx = 0 (→ +):
 Fy (+):
Fde – 4/8.94  55.9 – 8/11.31  70.7 = 0
Fde = 75 kN
8/8.94  55.9 – 8/11.31  70.7 = 0 …(Check)
100 kN
Ya=50 kN Yc
=50 kN
a c
b
d e
f
g
h
Xa
=0
Fdf
Ffg
f
100 kN
g
FegFdg
0 0
Fad
50 kN
a Fab
Fbd Fbe
b
25 25
Fbd
Fbe
b
d
0 70.7
Fde
0
55.9
56 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.18
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using
the method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mg =0:
 Md (left) = 0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya8 – Xa4 + 406 – 604 + 208
+ 403 + 104 = 0 ……………...(a)
Ya8 + Xa4 – 402 –604 = 0 ..(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Ya = 0 ; Xa = 80 kN
Yg + Ya – 60 – 40 = 0
Yg = 100 kN
Xg – Xa + 40 +20 + 10 = 0
Xg = 10 kN
100 kN
-25
-55.9
-25
-55.9
75
-70.7
-70.7
50 kN 50 kN
0 0
00
0 0
3
4
c 4.47
5.66
3
4 m 4 m 3 m
4 m
2 m
2 m
60 kN
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
f
g
a
b
d
e
4
5
4
5
4
2
4
60 kN
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
Xa =80
Xg
=10 kN
Ya=0
a
b
c
d
e f
g
Yg
=100 kN
Statically determinate trusses 57
Joint a
According to Rule 1: Fab = 80 kN , Fac = 0
Joint b
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy = 0 (+):
4/5.66 Fbd – 80 = 0
Fbd = 113.1 kN
Fbc + 4/5.66 Fbd – 60 = 0
Fbc = – 20 kN
Joint c
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy (+):
4/4.47 Fcd + 40 = 0
Fcd = – 44.7 kN
2/4.47 Fcd + 20
= – 2/4.47  44.7 + 20 = 0 ………. (Check)
Joint g
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy =0 (+):
3/5 Ffg + 10 = 0
Ffg = – 16.7 kN
Feg + 4/5 Ffg + 100 = 0
Feg – 4/5  16.7 + 100 = 0
Feg = – 86.7 kN
Joint e
According to rule 3: Fde = – 86.7 kN , Fef = – 10 kN
Joint f
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy (+):
– 3/5 Fdf + 10 + 3/5  16.7 = 0
Fdf = 33.3 kN
– 4/5 Fdf – 40 + 4/5  16.7
= – 4/5  33.3 – 40 + 4/5  16.7 = 0 …..
(Check)
Joint d
40 kN
c
0
20
Fcd
80 kN Fab
Fac
a
60 kN
b
80
Fbd
Fbc
10 kN
100 kN
g
Ffg
Feg
10 kN
e
Fde
Fef
86.7
40 kN
f
Fdf
10
16.7
58 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
20 + 3/5  33.3 + 4/4.72  44.7
– 4/5.66  113.1 = 0 …………… (Check)
86.7 – 4/5  33.3 + 2/4.72  44.7
– 4/5.66  113.1 = 0 …………… (Check)
Member forces
2.7 MEHOD OF SECTIONS
When the method of joints leads to a situation where no subsequent joint contains only
two unknown member forces, the next approach would be to use a group of joints (called a
section of the truss) as a free body. The method of sections may be used in lieu of the method
of joints, even when the method of joints is possible. The three equations of statics ( Fx =0,
 Fy =0, and  M =0) can be then used to calculate the unknown member forces.
Example 2.19
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown
truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Fx = 0 (→+):
Ya = Yh = 20  3 /2 = 30 kN
Xa = 0
Section s1-s1
 Me = 0
 Mb = 0
 Fy (+):
Fbd  3 + 20  4 – 30  8 = 0; Fbd = 53.3 kN
Fce  3 + 30  4 = 0; Fce = -40 kN
3/5 Fbe + 30 – 20 = 0; Fbe = – 16.7 kN
20 kN
44.7
113.1
86.7
33.3
d
60 kN
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
80
-20
113.1
-44.7
-86.7
33.3
-10
-86.7
-16.7
80 kN
10 kN
100 kN
0
4 at 4 m=16m
3 m
20 kN 20 kN20 kN
f
g
ha b d
c e
4
35
20 kN 20 kN 20 kNYa=30 Yh=30
Xa=0
a b
c
d
e
f
g
h
s 1
s1
s2
s 2
20 kN30 kN
a
b
c e
Fbd
Fbe
Fce
Statically determinate trusses 59
Section s2-s2
 Mb = 0
 Ma = 0
3/5 Fac  4 + 30  4 = 0
Fac = – 50 kN
Fbc  4 – 20  4 –3/5  16.7  4 = 0
Fbc = 30 kN
Member forces
Example 2.20
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss
using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mc =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  4 – 10  1.5 – 10  3
– 10  4.5 = 0
Ya = 22.5 kN
Yc – Ya = 0
Yc = 22.5 kN
– Xa + 10 + 10 + 10 = 0
Xa = 30 kN
Section s1-s1
 Mf = 0
 Md = 0
Fdg  4 + 30  1.5 – 22.5  4 = 0
Fdg = 11.3 kN
Ffi  4 + 22.5  4 – 30  1.5 = 0
Ffi = – 11.3 kN
20 kN30 kN
a
b 53.3
16.7Fac
Fbc
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN
40
-50
53.3
30
-16.7
53.3
20
40
-16.7
30
-50
-40 -40
30 kN 30 kN
2 m 2 m
1.5 m
1.5 m
1.5 m
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
f
g h
i
a
b
d
c
e
j k
2
1.5
2.5
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
Xa =30 kN
Ya =22.5 kN Yc =22.5 kN
a b
c
d e
f
g h i
j
k
s1 s 1
s2s2
10 kN
30 kN
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
a b
c
d
f
Fdg
Fde Fef
Ffi
60 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s2-s2
 Mi = 0
 Fx (→+):
1.5/2.5 Feg  2 + 2/2.5 Feg  1.5+ 11.3  4
+ 30  3 – 10  1.5 – 22.5  4 = 0
Feg = – 12.5 kN
2/2.5 Fei – 2/2.5 Feg + 10 – 30 = 0
Fei = 12.5 kN
Member forces
Example 2.21
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown
truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mg =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya18 – 4015 – 5012 – 806 = 0
Ya = 93.3 kN
Yg + Ya – 40 – 50 - 80 = 0
Yg = 76.7 kN
Xa = 0
Section s1-s1
10 kN
30 kN
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
a b
c
d
f
11.3
Feg Fei
11.3
e
i
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
30
22.5
-18.8
18.8
-22.5
5
11.3
-15
-12.5 12.5
-11.3
3.8
-10
-6.2 6.2
-3.8
-5
30 kN
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
0
-5
3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m
1.5 m
3 m
50 kN 80 kN
40 kN
f
ga
b
d
c e
3
3
4.24
3
4.5 5.41
1.5
6
6.18
50 kN
40 kN
93.3 kN
a c
b
Fce
Fcd
Fbd
o
9 m
d
50 kN 80 kN
40 kN
Ya =93.3 kN Yg=76.7
Xa =0
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
s1
s1
s2
s2
Statically determinate trusses 61
 Md =0:
 Mc =0:
 Mo =0:
Fce  4.5 + 93.3  9 – 40  6 – 50  3 = 0
Fce = – 100 kN
6/6.18 Fbd  3 + 1.5/6.18 Fbd  3 + 40  3 – 93.3  6 = 0
Fbd = 120.9 kN
4.5/5.41 Fcd  15 + 50  15 + 40  12 – 93.3  9= 0
Fcd = – 31.2 kN
Section s2-s2
 Mb =0:
 Fy (+):
Fac  3 + 93.3  3 = 0
Fac = – 93.3 kN
3/4.24 Fbc – 1.5/6.18  120.9 + 93.3 – 40 = 0
Fbc = – 33.9 kN
Member forces
Example 2.22
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown
truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mk =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Mf (right)=0:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  40 – 20  10 – 10  20 = 0
Ya = 10 kN
Yk – Ya = 0
Yk = 10 kN
Xk  20 – Yk  20 = 0
Xk = 10 kN
– Xa – Xk + 10+ 20 = 0
Xa = 20 kN
40 kN
93.3 kN
a
b
120.9
Fac
Fbc
50 kN 80 kN
40 kN
-93.3
132
-100
-33.9
-31.2
-76.7
-65.1
-40.9
108.4
120.9 126.4
93.3 kN 76.7 kN
14
.14
14.14
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
10 m
10 m
20 kN
10 kN
j
k
f g
h
i
a
b
d
c
e
10
10
10
10
20 kN
10 kN
Xa =20
Ya =10 kN
Xk=10
Yk=10 kN
a
b
c
d e
f
g
h
i j
k
s1
s1
s2
s2
62 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
 Mc =0:
 Mf =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
Fde  10 + 10  10 + 20  10 – 10  10= 0
Fde = – 20 kN
Fce  10 – 20  10 + 20  20 – 10  20= 0
Fce = 0
10/14.14 Fcf + Fce - 10 = 0
Fcf = 14.1 kN
Section s2-s2
 Mc =0:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Fbd  10 + 20  10 – 10  10= 0
Fbd = – 10 kN
– 10/14.14 Fcd +10/14.14  14.1 + 20
– 20 = 0
Fcd = 14.1 kN
Member forces
Example 2.23
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss
using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  8 – 120  18 = 0
Ya = 270 kN
Yb – Ya – 120 = 0
Yb = 390 kN
Xa = 0
120 kN
Ya=270 Yb=390 kN
a
b
d
c e
f
g
h
Xa
=0
s1
s1
s2
s2
s3
s3
s4
s4
20 kN
10 kN
20 kN
10 kN
Fde
Fce
Fcf
e
f
d
c
b
a
20 kN
20 kN
10 kN
0 14.1
c
b
a
Fcd
Fbd
20 kN
10 kN
-10
28.3
-14.1
-20
-10
14.1
14.1
-14.1
-20 -20
20 kN
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
a
cb
d e f g
i
h
j
k
0
8 m 6 m 6 m 6 m
8 m
5 m
3 m
120 kNf
g
h
a b
d
c
e
8
16
17.89
8
6
10
6
8
10
6
57.8 1
3
6
6.71
Statically determinate trusses 63
Section s1-s1
 Mf =0:
 Me =0:
 Mo =0:
Feg  3 + 390  12 – 270  20= 0
Feg = 240 kN
6/7.81 Fdf  8+ 270  14 + 390  6 = 0
Fdf = – 234.3 kN
3/6.71 Fef  9.6 + 270  23.6
– 390  15.6 = 0
Fef = – 67.1 kN
Section s2-s2
 Md =0:
 Mo =0:
Fce  8 +390  6 – 270  14= 0
Fce = 180 kN
Fde  9.6 + 390  15.6 – 270  23.6 = 0
Fde = 30 kN
Section s3-s3
 Mc =0:
 Mp =0:
6/10 Fbd  16 + 270  8 = 0
Fbd = – 225 kN
8/10 Fcd  12 + 270  20 – 390  12= 0
Fcd = – 75 kN
Section s4-s4
 Mb =0:
 Ma =0:
16/17.89  Fac  8 – 270  8 = 0
Fac = 301.9 kN
Fbc  8 + 390  8 – 8/10  225  8 = 0
Fbc = – 210 kN
270 kN 390 kN
Fce
Fde
234.3
9.6 m
o
a b
c
d
e
270 kN 390 kN
Feg
Fef
Fdf
9.6 m
o
a b
c
d
e
f
270 kN 390 kN
180
12 m
p
a b
c
Fcd
Fbd
270 kN 390 kN
a b
225Fac
Fbc
64 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
Example 2.24
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Md =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya 12 + 54 – 2012 – 206 = 0
Ya = 28.3 kN
Yd + Ya – 20 – 20 = 0
Yd = 11.7 kN
– Xa + 5 = 0
Xa = 5 kN
Section s1- s1
 Mi =0:
 Ma =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
Fbc 6 + 52 + 206 – 28.36 – 56 = 0
Fbc = 11.7 kN
6/6.32 Fei  4 + 5  4 = 0
Fei = – 5.3 kN
2/2.83 Ffi + 2/6.32 Fei + 28.3 – 20 = 0
Ffi = – 9.4 kN
Section s2- s2
120 kN
-135
301.9
-225
-210
-75
30
-234.3
180
-67.1
240
-268.3
240
270 kN 390 kN
4 m 2 m 2 m 4 m
4 m
2 m
5 kN
20 kN
20 kN
f g h
i
a
b
d
c
e
6
26.32
2
2
2.83
4
4
5.66
5 kN
20 kN
20 kN
Xa=5 kN
Ya =28.3 kN Yd=11.7 kN
a b c
d
e
f g
h
is1
s1
s2
s2
s3
s3
5 kN
20 kN
5 kN
28.3 kN
b
f
e
i
Fbc
Ffi
Fei
Statically determinate trusses 65
 Me =0:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Fbf  4 + 11.7  4 – 5  4 = 0
Fbf = – 6.7 kN
Fef + 11.7 + 5 – 5 – 6/6.32  5.3 = 0
Fef = – 6.7 kN
Section s3- s3
 Mb =0:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Fae  4 + 28.3  4 = 0
Fae = – 28.3 kN
– 4/5.66 Fbe + 11.7 – 5 = 0
Fbe = 9.4 kN
Member forces
Example 2.25
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mf =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  10.5 – 40  3.5 = 0
Ya = 13.3 kN
Yf + Ya – 40 = 0
Yf = 26.7 kN
Xa = 0
5 kN
20 kN
5 kN
28.3 kN
a b
e
11.7
5.3
Fef
Fbf
5 kN
28.3 kN
a b
11.7
6.7
Fbe
Fae
5 kN
20 kN
20 kN
5
-28.3
11.7
9.4
-6.7
-11.7
16.5
-11.7
-6.7
-5.3
-9.4
-11.7
-16.5
5 kN
28.3 kN 11.7 kN
0
0
1.5 m 2 m 3.5 m 2 m 1.5 m
2 m
1.5 m
40 kN
fa
b
dc
e1.5
2
2.5
40 kN
Ya =13.3 kN Yf=26.7 kN
a
b
c d
e
fs 1
s 1
Xa = 0
66 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
 Mo =0:
 Mg =0:
1.5/2.5 Fab  1.5 – 2/2.5 Fab  6.375
– 26.7  2.625 = 0
Fab = – 16.7 kN
1.5/2.5 Fef  3.5 – 2/2.5 Fef  7.875
– 26.7  7.875 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN
Member forces
Example 2.26
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown
truss using the method of sections.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  16 + 40  14 – 100  8 = 0
Ya = 15 kN
Yb + Ya – 100 = 0
Yb = 85 kN
– Xa + 40 = 0
Xa = 40 kN
26.7 kN
b
c
f
o
Fcd
Fef
Fab
g
2.625 m1.125 m
40 kN-16.7
18.4
-8.9
6.1
-50
26.8
-20 -60
-40
13.3 kN 26.7 kN
6 m 2 2 6 m
2 m
4 m
8 m
100 kN
40 kN
f
a b
d
c
e
8
28.25
6
6
8.49
8
2
8.25
100 kN
40 kN
Xa=40
Ya=15 kN Yb=85
a
b
c
d
e
f
s1
s 1
Statically determinate trusses 67
Section s1-s1
 Md =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
8/8.25 Fef  4 + 8/8.25 Fbc  4 – 2/8.25 Fbc  2
– 100  2 = 0 ……………………..……. (a)
8/8.25 Fef – 2/8.25 Fbc – 6/8.49 Fad – 100 = 0…(b)
– 2/8.25 Fef + 8/8.25 Fbc – 6/8.49 Fad = 0 ……..(c)
Solving (a), (b), and (c),
Fef = 66 kN , Fbc = – 16.5 kN , Fad = – 45.3 kN
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.27
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using a combination of method of sections
and method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mf =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  9 + 40  4 –50  6
– 50  3 = 0 ; Ya = 32.2 kN
Yf + Ya – 50 –50 = 0
Yf = 67.8 kN
– Xf + 40 = 0
Xf = 40 kN
100 kN
c
d
e
Fef
Fad Fbc
100 kN
40 kN
62.3
-45.3
19.6
-16.5
-93.3
35.8
71.6
-48
66
40 kN
15 kN 85 kN
a
c
b
d e
f
3 m 3 m 3 m
4 m
50 kN
40 kN
50 kN
fa
b
d
c e
9
49.85
4
3
5
50 kN
40 kN 50 kN
Ya
=32.2 kN
Xf=40
Yf=67.8 kN
a d
b
c
e
f
s1
s1
68 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
 Mf =0:
 Fy (+):
Fce  4 + 50  3 = 0
Fce = -37.5 kN
4/9.85 Fbf + 67.8 – 50 = 0
Fbf = – 43.8 kN
Joint f
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
Fef + 67.8 – 4/9.85  43.8 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN
– Fdf – 40 + 9/9.85  43.8 = 0
Fdf = 0
Joint e
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx (→+):
– 4/5 Fde + 50 = 0
Fde = 62.5 kN
– 3/5 Fde + 37.5
= – 3/5  62.5 + 37.5 = 0 ………(Check)
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.28
Determine the forces in the marked members of
the shown truss using a combination of method of
sections and method of joints.
SOLUTION
50 kN
40 kN
67.8 kN
Fad
e
f
d
Fbf
Fce
40 kN
67.8 kN
f
43.8
Fef
Fdf
e37.5
Fde
50
50 kN
40 kN
50 kN
37.5
17.8
-62.5
62.5
-43.8
-50
-37.5
32.2 kN
40 kN
67.8 kN
0
0
7.21
6 at 4 m =24 m
3 m
3 m
3 m
80 kN
30 kN
j
k
l
f
g
h
i
a
b d
c
e
4
6
4
3
5
Statically determinate trusses 69
Determination of Reactions
 Ml =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  24 – 80  16
– 30  6 = 0 ; Ya = 60.8 kN
Yl + Ya – 80 = 0
Yl = 19.2 kN
Xa – 30 = 0
Xa = 30 kN
Section s1-s1
 Mf = 0:
 Me =0:
 Ma =0:
4/5 Feg  6 + 3/5 Feg  4 – 80  4 + 60.8  12 = 0
Feg = – 56.9 kN
Fdf  6 + 30  6 – 60.8  8 = 0
Fdf = 51.1 kN
4/7.21 Fef  6 + 6/7.21 Fef  8 + 80  8 = 0
Fef = – 64.1 kN
Joint g
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
4/5 Fgi + 4/5  56.9 = 0
Fgi = – 56.9 kN
– Ffg + 3/5  56.9 – 3/5 Fgi = 0
Ffg = 68.3 kN
Joint e
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
– 4/5 Fce – 4/5  56.9 – 4/7.21  64.1 = 0
Fce = – 101.4 kN
– Fde + 6/7.21  64.1 – 3/5 Fce – 3/5  56.9 =
0
Fde = 80 kN
Member forces
80 kN
30 kN
j
k
l
f
g
h
i
a b d
c
e
Ya
=60.8 kN
Xa =30
Yl=19.2 kN
s 1
s1
80 kN
30 kN
60.8 kN
a b
c
e
d
f
Fef
Feg
Fdf
Ffg
56.9
Fgi
g
64.1
56.9
Fce
Fde
e
80 kN
30 kN
51.1
-101.4
51.1 51.1
80
25.6
-64.1
-18
68.3
25.6 25.6
-31.9
-101.4 -31.9
-56.9 -56.9
30 kN
60.8 kN 19.2 kN
0
00
0
0
70 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.29
Determine the forces in the marked members of
the shown truss using a combination of method of
sections and method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya = Yn = 100 kN
Xa = 0
Section s1-s1
 Mf = 0:
 Md = 0:
Fdg  6 + 40  4 – 100  8 = 0
Fdg = 106.7 kN
Ffh  6 – 40  4 + 100  8 = 0
Ffh = – 106.7 kN
Joint e
 Fx (→+): 4/5 Feh + 4/5 Feg = 0
Feh = – Feg ……………………………….(a)
Section s2-s2
 Fy (+):
From symmetry:
3/5 Feh – 3/5 Feg + 100 – 40 – 40 = 0 ..(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Feh = – 16.7 kN
Feg = 16.7 kN
Fhj = Feh = – 16.7 kN (compression)
Joint h
 Fy (+): – Fhg + 3/5  16.7 + 3/5  16.7 = 0
Fhg = 20 kN
Joint f
6 at 4 m = 24m
3 m
3 m
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
f
g
h
i
a
b d
c
e j
k
l
m
n
3
4
5
40 kN 40 kN100 kN
Ffh
Fef
Fde
Fdg
a
c
f
db
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN Yn=100Ya =100
a b d
c
e
f
g
h k
j
i l
m
nXa = 0
s 1
s 1 s 2
s 2
e
Fef
Fde
Feh
Feg
40 kN 40 kN100 kN
Ffh
Feh
Feg
Fdg
a
c
e
db
Fhg
16.7 16.7
h
Statically determinate trusses 71
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
– 4/5 Fcf – 106.7 = 0
Fcf = – 133.3 kN
– Fef – 3/5 Fcf = 0
Fef = 80 kN
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.30
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown
truss using a combination of method of sections and
method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya = Ye = 150 kN
Xa = 0
Section s1-s1
 Mc = 0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
Fjk  12.5 + 150  10 – 100  5 = 0
Fjk = – 80 kN
5/5.59 Fch + 150 – 100 –100 = 0
Fch = 55.9 kN
Fcd + Fjk + 2.5/5.59 Fch = 0
Fcd – 80 + 2.5/5.59  55.9 = 0
Fcd = 55 kN
Fcf
f
Fef
106.7
-166.7
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
106.7
-33.3
133.3
60
-33.3
133.3
40
-16.7
80
100 kN 100 kN
-133.3
-106.7
-133.3
-16.7
133.3 106.7
16.7
-106.7
20
16.7
6080
133.3
40
-1 66.7
5.59
7.91
4 at 5 m = 20 m
5 m
7.5 m
100 kN 100 kN 100 kN
f g h i
a
b dc
e
j k
2.5
7.5
5
2.5
100 kN 100 kNYa=150 kN Ye =150100 kN
Xa=0
a b c d e
f g h i
j k
s1
s1
s2
s2
100 kN 100 kN150 kN
a
f
j
g
b c
Fjk
Fch
Fcd
72 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Joint j
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
– 7.5/7.91 Ffj – 7.5/7.91 Fgj = 0 ………….(a)
– 2.5/7.91 Ffj + 2.5/7.91 Fgj – 80 = 0 …….(b)
Solving (a) and (b),
Ffj = – 126.5 kN ; Fgj = 126.5 kN
Section s2-s2
 Mb =0:
 Fy (+):
Ffg  5 +150  5 – 2.5/7.91  126.5  5
– 7.5/7.91  126.5  2.5= 0
Ffg = – 50 kN
5/5.59 Fbg + 150 – 100 – 7.5/7.91  126.5 = 0
Fbg = 78.3 kN
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.31
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using a combination of method of
sections and method of joints.
SOLUTION
j 80
Ffj Fgj
100 kN150 kN
a
f
b
126.5
Ffg
Fbg
Fbc
100 kN 100 kN 100 kN
75
-167.7
55
33.5
78.3
55
55.9
55.9
75
78.3
33.5
-167.7
-50
-126.5
126.5
-50
126.5
-126.5
-80
150 kN 150 kN
3.61
6.71
3 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 3 m
4 m
2 m
20 kN
40 kN 40 kN
f g h i
a b
dc
e
2
3
2
1.5
2.5
6
3
Statically determinate trusses 73
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  3 + 40  1.5 – 40  3
– 20  6 = 0 ; Ya = 60 kN
Yb – Ya – 40 – 40 = 0
Yb = 140 kN
– Xa + 20 = 0
Xa = 20 kN
Section s1-s1
 Mg =0:
 Mo =0:
 Fy (+):
Fab  6 + 60  1.5 – 20  6 = 0
Fab = 5 kN
Ffg  6 + 20  6 + 60  3 = 0
Ffg = – 50 kN
2/2.5 Fcg – 60 = 0
Fcg = 75 kN
Joint a
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
– 3/6.71 Fae + 5 – 20 = 0
Fae = – 33.5 kN
Fac + 6/6.71 Fae – 60 = 0
Fac = 90 kN
Joint e
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
– 2/3.61 Fce + 6/6.71  33.5 = 0
Fce = 54.1 kN
Fef + 20 + 3/3.61 Fce – 3/6.71  33.5 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN
Member forces
20 kN
40 kN 40 kN
Xa=20 kN
Ya=60 kN Yb=140 kN
a b
e
c d
f
g
h is1
s 1
20 kN
20 kN
60 kN
Fab
Ffg
gf
Fcg
c
e
a
3 m
o
20 kN
60 kN
5
a
FacFae
20 kN
Fef
e
Fce
33.5
20 kN
40 kN
40 kN
5
-33.5
90
11.2
-150
-50
54.1
-50 70
75
-125
70
-90.1
20 kN
60 kN 140 kN
0 0
74 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.32
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using a combination of method of sections
and method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mg =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Yf  8 + 10  5 + 20  4
– 40  4 = 0 ; Yf = 3.7 kN
Yg + Yf – 40 – 20 = 0
Yg = 56.3 kN
– Xg + 10 = 0
Xg = 10 kN
Section s1-s1
 Mc =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
4/4.12 Fhi  3 + 1/4.12 Fhi 4 + 10  3 + 3.7  4 = 0
Fhi = – 11.6 kN
2/4.47 Fcf + 1/4.12 Fhi + 3.7 = 0
Fcf = – 2.1 kN
Fbc + 4/4.47 Fcf + 4/4.12 Fhi + 10 = 0
Fbc = 3.1 kN
Joint h
 Fx (→+):
 Fy (+):
– 4/5 Fah – 4/4.12  11.6 + 10 = 0
Fah = – 1.6 kN
– Fbh – 3/5 Fah – 1/4.12  11.6 = 0
Fbh = – 1.9 kN
Joint a
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
– 2/4.47 Faf – 3/5  1.6 = 0
Faf = – 2.1 kN
Fab + 4/4.47 Faf – 4/5  1.6 = 0
Fab = 3.1 kN
4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m
2 m
3 m
1 m
40 kN 20 kN
10 kN j
f g
h
i
a
b dc e
4
1
4.12 4
35
2
4
4.47
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
Yf=3.7 kN
Xg=10 kN
Yg=56.3
a
b
f
c
h i j
d
g
e
s 1
s 1
10 kN
3.7 kN
Fcf
Fbc
Fhi
c
ba
f
h
h
11.6
Fbh
Fah
10 kN
a
Fab
Faf
1.6
Statically determinate trusses 75
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.33
Determine the forces in the marked members of the
shown truss using a combination of method of
sections and method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya = Yp = 300 kN
Xa = 0
Joint f
 Fx (→+): 10/11.18 Ffk + 10/11.18 Ffi = 0
Ffk + Ffi = 0 ………………………..….….(a)
Joint i
 Fx (→+): – 10/11.18 Ffi – 10/11.18 Fdi = 0
Ffi + Fdi = 0 ……………………….………(b)
Section s1-s1
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
3.1
-2.1
-1.6
3.1
-1.9
-1.9
68.1
-2.1 -74.8
5.6
68.1
5.65.6
-63.6
-14.1
-11.6 -11.6
3.7 kN
10 kN
56.3 kN
11 .18
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
5 m
5 m
5 m
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
5
10
Xa=0
Yp=300
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
Ya=300
s 1
s 2
s1
s 2
f
Ffi
Ffk
Ffg
Fef
Fij
Ffi
Fdi
Fhi
i
a
b
c
d
e
g
300 kN
Fad
Fde
Fef
Ffg
Fgk
76 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
 Fy (+): 5/11.18 Ffk – 5/11.18 Ffi – 5/11.18 Fdi
+ 300 – 200 = 0
Ffk – Ffi + Fdi + 223.6 = 0 ……………..…(c)
Solving (a), (b), and (c),
Ffk = – 74.5 kN
Ffi = 74.5 kN
Fdi = – 74.5 kN
Section s2-s2
 Md = 0:
 Mg = 0:
Fgk  15 + 30010 = 0
Fgk = – 200 kN
Fad  15 – 300  10 = 0
Fad = 200 kN
Joint d
 Fy (+):
 Fx (→+):
Fde – 5/11.18  74.5 – 200 = 0
Fde= 233.3 kN
Fdh – 10/11.18  74.5 – 200 = 0
Fdh = 266.7 kN
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.34
Determine the forces in the marked members of
the shown truss using a combination of method of
sections and method of joints.
SOLUTION
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
200 kN300 kN
Fdh
Fdi
Ffi
Ffk
Fgk
Fde
200 d
200 kN
Fdh
74.5
100
166.7
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
-200
200
-223.6
0
223.6
-223.6
0
233.3
266.7
-74.5
33.3
100
74.5
-74.5
-200
200
74.5
100
33.3
-74.5
74.5
-266.7
0
223.6
166.7
-33.3
-223.6
223.6
-200
-300-100
300 kN 300 kN
5
3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m
3 m
1 m
1 m20 kN
60 kN 40 kN
f
g
h
i
a b
d
c
e
3
1
3.16
3
4
Statically determinate trusses 77
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  6 + 603 – 403 – 204 = 0
Ya = 3.3 kN
Yb – Ya – 60 – 40 = 0
Yb = 103.3 kN
– Xb + 20 = 0
Xb = 20 kN
Group cdfe
 Fx (at d) =0:
 Fx (at e) =0:
 Fy (at d) =0:
 Fy (at e) =0:
Fcd = Fdf …………………………….(a)
Fce = Fef ……………………..….…..(b)
Fde = 1/3.16 Fcd + 1/3.16 Fde ……...(c)
Fde = 1/3.16 Fce + 1/3.16 Fef ……..(d)
 Fx (at c) =0:
 Fy (at c) :
From (a), (b), (c), and (d)
Fcd = Fdf = Fce = Fef
Fcd = 0.527 F
From (c), Fcd = 0.333 F
1/3.16 Fcd – 1/3.16 Fce =0;
Fcd = Fce
Then, the group cdfe is carrying only a horizontal force. So, the group can be replaced by a link
member as shown in figure.

Replacing member groups cdfe and fgih by link
members, the truss becomes as shown in figure
20 kN
60 kN 40 kN
Ya=3.3 kN
Xb=20
Yb=103.3
a b
e
f
h
c
d g
i
s1
s1
d
e
Fde
FdeFcd
FefFce
FF
c f
F FFF F
0.527 F
0.333F
0.527 F0.527 F
0.527 F
20 kN
60 kN 40 kN
3.3 kN
20 kN
103.3 kN
a
c f
i
b
78 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
 Ma =0:
 Mf =0:
 Fy (+):
Fcf  4 + 20  4 = 0 ; Fcf = – 20 kN
Then, from group cdfe, we get
Fcd = Fef = – 0.527  20 = – 10.5 kN, and
Fde = 0.333  20 = 6.7 kN
Fab  4 +3.3  3 = 0 , Fab = – 2.5 kN
4/5 Faf – 3.3 = 0 ; Faf = 4.2 kN
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.35
Determine the forces in all members of the shown
truss using a combination of method of sections and
method of joints.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mi =0:
 Fy (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  24 – 80  18 – 60  15
– 100  12 – 60  9 – 60  3 = 0
Ya = 177.5 kN
Yi + Ya – 80 – 60 – 100 – 60
– 60 = 0 ; Yi = 182.5 kN
Xa = 0
The given compound truss is subdivided into a primary truss and four secondary trusses as
follow:
20 kN
3.3 kN
a
c fFcf
Faf
Fab
20 kN
60 kN 40 kN
-2.5
4.2
-79.2
-50
-10.5
-10.5
6.7
-10.5
-10.5
15.8
15.8
-10
15.8
15.8
3.3 kN
20 kN
103.3 kN
0
a
b c d e f g h
i
j
k
l m
n o p
3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m
3 m
3 m
80 kN
100 kN 60 kN60 kN
60 kN
Ya=177.5
Yi=182.5
a
b c d e f g h
i
j
k
l m
n o p
80 kN 100 kN 60 kN
60 kN
60 kN
Xa
=0
Statically determinate trusses 79
Primary truss Secondary trusses
The secondary trusses are first analyzed by the method of joints, and the forces in their
members are given in the figure. The secondary trusses are supported by the primary truss.
Loads that equal to the reactions of the secondary trusses must be applied at the corresponding
panel points of the primary truss in the opposite direction. For example,
At panel point c of the primary truss
Load acting on the compound truss at c = 80 kN ()
Reaction at c on the secondary truss cked = 30 kN ()
Therefore, load transferred from the secondary truss cked to panel point c of primary truss =
30 kN ()
Total load acting at panel point c of the primary truss = 80 + 30 = 110 kN ()
At panel point e of the primary truss
Load acting on the compound truss at e = 100 kN ()
Reaction at e on the secondary truss cked = 30 kN ()
Reaction at e on the secondary truss elgf = 30 kN ()]
Therefore, load transferred from the secondary trusses cked and elgf to panel point
e of primary truss = 30 +30 = 60 kN ()
Total load acting at panel point c of the primary truss = 80 + 60 = 110 kN ()
After all the panel-point loads are determined, the primary truss is analyzed by the method of
joints or sections.
The forces in the members of the given compound truss are obtained by algebraic
summation of the forces in the corresponding members of the primary and secondary trusses.
The final member forces are given as follows:
Final member forces
-258.1
-215.7
-42.4
-42.4
-251
-251
177.5 177.5
0
207.5
0
110 207.5
60
182.5
53
88.4
0
182.5
60
182.5
-42.4
60
182.5
60
95.5
130.8
-245 -245
177.5 kN 182.5 kN
80 kN 100 kN 60 kN60 kN 60 kN
000
a
j
c
b0 0
0
0
0
-42.4
-42.4
30 30
60
30 kN60 kN30 kN
c
k
e
d
-42.4
30 30
60
-42.4
30 kN60 kN30 kN
e
l
g
f
-42.4
30 30
60
-42.4
30 kN60 kN30 kN
g
m
i
h
-258.1
-215.7
-42.4
-42.4
-251
-251
177.5 177.5
0
207.5
0
110
207.5
60
182.5
53
88.4
0
182.5
60
182.5
-42.4
60
182.5
60
95.5
130.8
-245 -245
177.5 kN 182.5 kN
80 kN 100 kN 60 kN60 kN 60 kN
80 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
2.8 COMPLEX TRUSSES
The configuration of some trusses can be categorized as neither simple nor compound. For
example, the truss in Fig. 2.4 is a simple, as can be demonstrated by starting with triangle abc
and subsequently expanding the truss by adding two members and one joint at a time to locate
joints e, d, f, and g in that order. If member eb is removed and replaced by member ag, as
shown in Fig. 2.4, a different rigid truss is created that is neither simple nor compound but
complex. Since this truss is statically determinate, the method of joints and the method of
sections can be used for the analysis. In this case, several linear equations should be solved to
get the forces in the members. The solution of this set of equations is somewhat tedious.
An alternative approach is proposed by considering the force in one member of the truss
as P. The forces in other members can now be obtained in terms of P. The value of P can be
determined when resolving the last joint in the truss at which two different expressions of one
member force are found. Once P is calculated, then the forces in all members become known.
This method is illustrated numerically in Example 2.37.
The virtual work method may also be used for solving complex trusses. This method is
proceeded by removing one member and replacing it by another one to change the structure to
a simple truss. The new simple truss can be solved by one or more of the previous method.
Let the forces in the new simple truss, due to the applied forces, be F0. The applied forces are
then removed and two opposite unit loads (X = 1) are applied in the direction of the removed
member. The truss is now resolved for the new case of loading. The system of forces is termed
F1. Let the forces in the new member be F0 and F1 from systems F0 and F1, respectively. To
eliminate the effect of the new member, the final force should be zero. Therefore,
F0 + X F1 = 0 ……………………………………………(2.1)
(a) (b)
Fig. 2.4 Simple and complex trusses
From this condition, the value of X can be determined and consequently the forces in all
members can be easily determined by adding the two sets of forces F0 and X F1 as follow:
0
1
F
X
F
= − ………………………………………………(2.2)
F (final) = F0 + X F1 …………………………………….(2.3)
This approach is illustrated numerically in the following example.
a
b
d
c
e g
f
a
b
d
c
e g
f
Statically determinate trusses 81
EXAMPLE 2.36
Determine the forces in all members of the shown
complex truss.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
From symmetry:
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya = Yc = 80/2 = 40 kN
Xa = 0
If member ef is removed and member dg is added, the following simple truss is obtained
Member forces (F0)
This simple truss can be analyzed using the method of joints and the members forces is called
F0
If the actual applied forces are removed and two equal and opposite unit forces are applied at
joints e and f (the ends of the removed member) and in the direction ef. The following internal
forces (F1) can be determined using the method of joints.
Member forces (F1)
The final forces (F) in the original truss members are calculated using the following
relationship:
F = F0 + X F1
4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m
4 m
2 m
80 kN
f
g
a
b
d
c
e
80 kNYa
=40 kN Yc=40 kN
Xa=0
a
b
c
d
e f
g
a
b
c
d
e f
g
80 kN
0
-40
0
0
89.4 89.4
0
-40
0
-80
0
40 kN 40 kN
a
b
c
d
e f
g
1.0 kN
0.50
0.25
-0.559
0.50
0 0
-0.559
0.25
0.559
-0.50
0.559
0 0
82 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
where X is a dimensionless correction factor which is the negative ratio between F0 and F1 of
the added member that is given as follow:
0
1
80
160
0.5dg
F
X kN
F
  − 
= − = − = −   −  
The final internal forces is in the original complex truss is given as follow:
Final member forces
EXAMPLE 2.37
Determine the forces in all members of the shown
complex truss.
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
 Mb =0:
 Fy =0 (+):
 Fx =0 (→+):
Ya  20 + 20  5 + 10  15
– 60  10 = 0 ; Ya = 17.5 kN
Yb + Ya – 60 = 0
Yb = 42.5 kN
– Xa + 20 +10 = 0
Xa = 30 kN
The force in member ad is assumed to be P kN (Fad = P kN). Using the method of joints, the
forces in the other members are determine in terms of P as follows:
80 kN
-80
-80
89.4
-80
89.4 89.4
89.4
-80
-89.4
-160 -89.4
40 kN
40 kN
20.62
14.14
a b
c
d
e
f
10 m 10 m
5 m
5 m
5 m
20 kN
60 kN
10 kN
10
10
20
5
a
b
c
d
e
f
20 kN
60 kN
10 kN
Xa
=30 kN
Ya = 17.5 kN Yb
= 42.5 kN
Statically determinate trusses 83
Joint d
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy =0 (+):
– 10/14.14 Fdf – 20/20.62 P = 0
Fdf = – 1.373 P kN ……………………………(a)
– Fbd + 10/14.14 Fdf – 5/20.62 P = 0
Fbd = – 1.212 P kN ……………………………(b)
Joint f
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy =0 (+):
– 10/14.14 Fcf – 10/14.14  1.373 P + 10 = 0
Fcf = (14.14 – 1.373 P) kN …………………….(c)
– Fef – 10/14.14 Fcf + 10/14.14  1.373 P – 60 = 0
Fef = (1.94 P – 70) kN …………………………(d)
Joint e
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy (+):
10/14.14 Fbe – 10/14.14 Fae = 0
Fbe = Fae
– 10/14.14 Fbe – 10/14.14 Fae + (1.94 P – 70) = 0
Fbe = Fae = (1.372 P – 49.49) kN ………….(e)
Joint a
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy = 0 (+):
20/20.62 Fad + 10/14.14  (1.372 P – 49.49) – 30 = 0
Fad = (67 – P) kN ……………………………….(f)
Fac + 5/20.62 Fad + 10/14.14  (1.372 P – 49.49)
+ 17.5 = 0
Fac = (1.254 – 0.728 P) kN ……………………..(g)
It is noticed that member ad has two values. These values are the original estimated value (P)
and the value obtained from Eq. (f) (67 – P). Since the two values must be equal, then
P = 67 – P
Or, P = 33.5 kN
The forces in the members can be obtained by substituting P = 33.5 in Eqs. (a) to (g) as follows:
From Eq.(a):
From Eq.(b):
From Eq.(c):
From Eq.(d):
From Eq.(e):
Fdf = – 1.373  33.5 = – 46 kN
Fbd = – 1.212  33.5 = – 40.6 kN
Fcf = 14.14 – 1.373  33.5 = – 31.8 kN
Fef = 1.94  33.5 – 70 = – 5 kN
d
Fbd
P
Fdf
e
Fae Fbe
(1.94P-70)
a
30 kN
17.5 kN
(1.372P-49.49)
Fad
Fac
Fef
f10 kN
60 kN
1.373P
Fcf
84 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
From Eq.(g):
Fbe = Fae = 1.372  33.5 – 49.49 = – 3.5 kN
Fac = 1.254 – 0.728  33.5 = – 23.1 kN
The force in the remaining member can be obtained by analyzing the forces at joint c as follow:
 Fx =0 (→+):
 Fy (+):
20/20.62 Fbc + 20 - 10/14.14  31.8 = 0
Fbc =2.6 kN
23.1 – 5/20.62 Fbc – 10/14.14  31.8 = 0 .(Check)
Final member forces
2.9 GRAPHICAL METHOD OF JOINTS (MAXWELL DIAGRAM)
Any group of forces in equilibrium, when plotted to scale successively by arrowhead lines,
should form a closed polygon. The external force polygon represents the reactions and external
forces. Each internal force polygon represents the equilibrium of the concurrent forces at each
joint. If the external forces and reactions is reading in a clockwise manner around the outside
of the truss, the internal forces must also be reading in a clockwise manner around each joint.
The procedure for the graphical method of joints is proposed as follows:
1. Assign a number to the space outside the truss that is separated by either a reaction or an
external force, proceeding clockwise around the truss.
2. Assign a number to each triangle within the truss.
3. Begin the construction of the Maxwell diagram by starting with the external forces system,
drawing a line parallel to and in the direction of a known external force and of a length to
represent its magnitude to scale. Proceed around the structure clockwise; the resulting
force polygon should close, as the external force system is in equilibrium.
4. Then applying superposition on the external force line polygon, such as 1-2-3-4-5 in the
next example, and beginning with joint containing only two unknowns, construct line
polygons for each joint in succession until all joints have been treated. At each joint
proceed from force to force clockwise around the joint.
5. To interpret the results, at a given joint a member is designated by two numbers, always
using the sequence obtained by moving clockwise around a joint. The “number-number”
sequence is the same sequence used on the Maxwell diagram to establish the directions of
the forces. The length of the line on the Maxwell diagram is proportional to the magnitude
of the force.
c
20 kN Fbc
23.1
31.8
a
b
c
d
e
f
20 kN
60 kN
10 kN-23.1
33.5
-3.5
2.6
-40.6
-3.5
-31.8
-46
-5
30 kN
17.5 kN
42.5 kN
Statically determinate trusses 85
EXAMPLE 2.38
Determine the forces in the members of the
shown truss by the graphical method of joints.
SOLUTION
The spaces between external forces and reactions are designated 1-2-3-4-5-1 clockwise
around the truss, so the force vector 1-2-3-4-5-1 forms a closed polygon. The four internal
triangles are numbered 6-7-8-9. These numbers are determined in the Maxwell diagram in
succession; for instance, point 6 is the intersection of 1-6 parallel to member ac and 2-6 parallel
to member ce.
The magnitude of each of axial force may be measured from the force diagram and its
direction acting on the joint (tension-compression) is determined by the indicated direction
when proceeding from point to point on the Maxwell diagram according to the name of the
member obtained by reading in a clockwise pattern around a joint of the truss diagram. For
example,
Fab = 7-4 on joint a = 4-7 on joint b = 20 kN (tension)
Fac = 1-6 on joint a = 6-1 on joint c = 14.1 kN (compression)
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
a b
c d
e f
3 m 4 m 3 m
3 m
3 m20 kN
30 kN
a b
c d
e f
20 kN
30 kN
30 kN
12.5 kN 7.5 kN
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
9
1
2 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
86 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.39
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.19 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.40
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.21 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7,10
8
9
11
a b
c d
e f
20 kN
30 kN
20
-14.1
-2.5
21.2
-9
-15
14.1
21.2
15
30 kN
12.5 kN 7.5 kN
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN30 kN 30 kN
a b
c
d
e
f
g
h
1234
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN
40
-50
53.3
30
-16.7
53.3
20
40
-16.7
30
-50
-40 -40
30 kN 30 kN
Statically determinate trusses 87
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.41
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss
by the graphical method of joints
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
50 kN 80 kN
40 kN
93.3 kN 76.7kN
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
12
3 4 5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
50 kN 80 kN
40 kN
-93.3
132
-100
-33.9
-31.2
-76.7
-65.1
-40.9
108.4
120.9 126.4
93.3 kN 76.7 kN
7 m 7 m 7 m 7 m
7 m
2 m
80 kN
100 kN 60 kN
f
g
ha
b d
c
e
80 kN
100 kN 60 kN125 kN 115 kN
123
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
a
b d f
h
g
e
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
88 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.42
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.28 by the graphical method of
joints
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.43
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.18 by the graphical method of
joints
SOLUTION
-176.8
80 kN
100 kN 60 kN
125 132.2
9.3
-11.8
132.2
100
115
82.1
-28.1
-162.6
-130 -119.6
125 kN 115 kN
80 kN
30 kN
j
k
l
f
g
h
i
a b d
c
e
60.8 kN
30 kN
19.2 kN
12
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10 11
12
13
14 15
1
2
3,5
4
6,7,8
9
10
11
12,13
14,15
-56.9
-64.1
-101.4
80 kN
30 kN
51.1
-101.4
51.1 51.1
80
25.6
-18
68.3
25.6 25.6
-31.9
-31.9
-56.9
30 kN
60.8 kN 19.2 kN
0
0
0
0
0
Statically determinate trusses 89
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.44
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.14 by the graphical method of
joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
1 2
3
4,9 5 6
7 8
10
1112
60 kN
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
80 kN
10 kN
a b
c
d
e f
g
100 kN
1
2
3
4
5 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
60 kN
40 kN
20 kN
10 kN
40 kN
80
-20
113.1
-44.7
-86.7
33.3
-10
-86.7
-16.7
80 kN
10 kN
100 kN
0
50 kN
25 kN 75 kN
a b
c d
e
f
g
h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
1
2
3
4
5 6
7 8
9
90 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.45
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.20 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
Xa=30 kN
Ya=22.5 kN Yc=22.5 kN
a b
c
d e
f
g h i
j
k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
50 kN
-12.5
28
15
-83.3
-16.7
37.3
23.6
-100
-50
70.7
-50
-100
70.7
25 kN 75 kN
1,9
2,6
3 4 5
7
8
10 12
11,13 15
14
10 kN
10 kN
10 kN
30
22.5
-18.8
18.8
-22.5
5
11.3
-15
-12.5 12.5
-11.3
3.8
-10
-6.2 6.2
-3.8
-5
30 kN
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
0
-5
Statically determinate trusses 91
EXAMPLE 2.46
Determine the forces in the members of the shown
truss by the graphical method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.47
Determine the forces in the members of the shown
truss by the graphical method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m
1.5 m
1.5 m
3 m
80 kN
100 kN
50 kN
f
g
a b
d
c
e
80 kN
100 kN
50 kN
50 kN
80.6 kN 99.4 kN
123
4
5
6
7
8 9 10
11
a
b
e
c d
g
f
1
2
4
5 6
7
8
9
10,11
3
-397.9-380.2
-397.9-380.2
80 kN
100 kN
50 kN
394.8 358.7
137.3
-100
320
274.2
50 kN
80.6 kN 99.4 kN
0
a b
c
d e f g
h i j
3 m 8 m 8 m 3 m
4 m
3 m
30 kN 10 kN
80 kN
a b
c d e f
g
h i j30 kN 10 kN
80 kN
73.8 kN 46.2 kN
12
3
4
5
6
7 8 9 10 11 12
13
1
2
3,6
4
7
8
9,10
11
125,13
92 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.48
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.16 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.49
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the
graphical method of joints.
SOLUTION
1
2 3
4
56
7
8
9
10
11
1212
-73.8
42.4
a b
c d e f
g
h i j30 kN 10 kN
80 kN
0
-73.8
-46.2
0
-30 -30 -10
124.6
0
103.2
-10
-46.3
14.1
-86.7 -86.7
73.8 kN 46.2 kN
100 kN 100 kN
71.4 kN
100 kN
71.4 kN
100 kN
a
b
c
d
e
g
h
f
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9 10 11
12
100 kN 100 kN
-79.9
-64.3
-79.9
-64.3
102.7
-100
27.5
102.7
-100
27.5
-93.7 -93.7
-93.7 -93.7
71.4 kN
100 kN
71.4 kN
100 kN
a b
c d
e
f g h
i
9 m
4 m
4 m
4 m20 kN
20 kN10 kN
9 m
4 m 4 m
Statically determinate trusses 93
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.50
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.33 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
a
b
c d
e
f g
h
i
20 kN 20 kN
10 kN
10 kN
13.3 kN
20 kN
26.7 kN
7
8
10
9
13
11 12
12
3
4 5
6 1,8
2 3
4
5
67
9
12
13 10,11
a b
c d
e
f g
h
i
20 kN 20 kN
10 kN
-16.7
0
-33.3
-20
-20.6
8.3
0
-8.3
-20.6
5 5
8.3
5
-8.3
10 kN
13.3 kN
20 kN
26.7 kN
120 kN
270 kN 390 kN
a b
d
c
e
f
g
h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8,9
94 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.51
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.29 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
Member forces
EXAMPLE 2.52
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss
by the graphical method of joints.
SOLUTION
120 kN
-135
301.9
-225
-210
-75
30
-234.3
180
-67.1
240
-268.3
240
270 kN 390 kN
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 100 kN100 kN
a b d
c
e
f
g
h k
j
i l
m
n
123456
7
8 9
10
11
13
12
14
15
16
17
18 19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
19
18
17
15
12,16
14
13
-166.7
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
106.7
-33.3
133.3
60
-33.3
133.3
40
-16.7
80
100 kN 100 kN
-133.3
-106.7
-133.3
-16.7
133.3 106.7
16.7
-106.7
20
16.7
60
80
133.3
40
-166.7
8 at 4 m 32 m
3 m
3 m
50 kN 50 kN50 kN50 kN 50 kN50 kN 50 kN
o
p
f
g
h
i
a
b d
c
e
j
k
l
m
n
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures
Analysis of structures

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Trusses The Method Of Sections
Trusses  The Method Of SectionsTrusses  The Method Of Sections
Trusses The Method Of SectionsAmr Hamed
 
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness method
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness methodCh 1 structural analysis stiffness method
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness method280632796
 
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSESFLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSESvempatishiva
 
3.4 pushover analysis
3.4 pushover analysis3.4 pushover analysis
3.4 pushover analysisNASRIN AFROZ
 
Design of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing pptDesign of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing pptBharti Shinde
 
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam KassimaliSolution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimaliphysicsbook
 
Lec.6 strength design method rectangular sections 2
Lec.6   strength design method rectangular sections  2Lec.6   strength design method rectangular sections  2
Lec.6 strength design method rectangular sections 2Muthanna Abbu
 
determinate and indeterminate structures
determinate and indeterminate structuresdeterminate and indeterminate structures
determinate and indeterminate structuresvempatishiva
 
Structure analysis assignment 7 determinate frame analysis
Structure analysis assignment 7  determinate frame analysisStructure analysis assignment 7  determinate frame analysis
Structure analysis assignment 7 determinate frame analysisThe University of Lahore
 
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...Muthanna Abbu
 
Muller-Breslau’s Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches and Stiffening Girders
Muller-Breslau’s  Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches  and Stiffening GirdersMuller-Breslau’s  Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches  and Stiffening Girders
Muller-Breslau’s Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches and Stiffening GirdersAayushi5
 

Tendances (20)

Column
ColumnColumn
Column
 
Trusses The Method Of Sections
Trusses  The Method Of SectionsTrusses  The Method Of Sections
Trusses The Method Of Sections
 
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness method
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness methodCh 1 structural analysis stiffness method
Ch 1 structural analysis stiffness method
 
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSESFLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
FLEXURAL STRESSES AND SHEAR STRESSES
 
09.01.03.072
09.01.03.07209.01.03.072
09.01.03.072
 
3.2 force method
3.2 force method3.2 force method
3.2 force method
 
Footing design
Footing designFooting design
Footing design
 
Strut and Tie Model for Pile Cap
Strut and Tie Model for Pile CapStrut and Tie Model for Pile Cap
Strut and Tie Model for Pile Cap
 
1
11
1
 
3.4 pushover analysis
3.4 pushover analysis3.4 pushover analysis
3.4 pushover analysis
 
Structural engineering iii
Structural engineering iiiStructural engineering iii
Structural engineering iii
 
Design of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing pptDesign of combined footing ppt
Design of combined footing ppt
 
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam KassimaliSolution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
 
Lec.6 strength design method rectangular sections 2
Lec.6   strength design method rectangular sections  2Lec.6   strength design method rectangular sections  2
Lec.6 strength design method rectangular sections 2
 
determinate and indeterminate structures
determinate and indeterminate structuresdeterminate and indeterminate structures
determinate and indeterminate structures
 
Column design: as per bs code
Column design: as per bs codeColumn design: as per bs code
Column design: as per bs code
 
Structure analysis assignment 7 determinate frame analysis
Structure analysis assignment 7  determinate frame analysisStructure analysis assignment 7  determinate frame analysis
Structure analysis assignment 7 determinate frame analysis
 
Chapter27(1)
Chapter27(1)Chapter27(1)
Chapter27(1)
 
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...
Lec.2 statically determinate structures &amp; statically indeterminate struct...
 
Muller-Breslau’s Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches and Stiffening Girders
Muller-Breslau’s  Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches  and Stiffening GirdersMuller-Breslau’s  Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches  and Stiffening Girders
Muller-Breslau’s Principle, Two hinged and Fixed Arches and Stiffening Girders
 

Similaire à Analysis of structures

Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic Indeterminacy
Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic IndeterminacyStatic Indeterminacy and Kinematic Indeterminacy
Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic IndeterminacyDarshil Vekaria
 
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacyNilesh Baglekar
 
1-210605072653.pptx
1-210605072653.pptx1-210605072653.pptx
1-210605072653.pptxSamratRoy57
 
Structural analysis 1
Structural analysis   1Structural analysis   1
Structural analysis 1R VIJAYAKUMAR
 
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural Analysis
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural AnalysisSummary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural Analysis
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural AnalysisAbdullah Khair
 
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptxsunilghosh11
 
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdf
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdfApproximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdf
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdfAshrafZaman33
 
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajape
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajapeUnit 3 flexibility-anujajape
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajapeanujajape
 
L04 5.pdf (trusses)
L04 5.pdf (trusses)L04 5.pdf (trusses)
L04 5.pdf (trusses)nur izzaati
 
structure analysis
structure analysisstructure analysis
structure analysisjahanzaib54
 
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406Saqib Imran
 
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes methodsolving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes methodSyed Md Soikot
 
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes methodsolving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes methodSyed Md Soikot
 

Similaire à Analysis of structures (20)

Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic Indeterminacy
Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic IndeterminacyStatic Indeterminacy and Kinematic Indeterminacy
Static Indeterminacy and Kinematic Indeterminacy
 
Report(Tausif)
Report(Tausif)Report(Tausif)
Report(Tausif)
 
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy
1.1 static and kinematic indeterminacy
 
1-210605072653.pptx
1-210605072653.pptx1-210605072653.pptx
1-210605072653.pptx
 
Structural analysis 1
Structural analysis   1Structural analysis   1
Structural analysis 1
 
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural Analysis
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural AnalysisSummary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural Analysis
Summary of CHAPTER 6 (ACI318-14M) Structural Analysis
 
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx
1-131020115208-phpapp02.pptx
 
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdf
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdfApproximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdf
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeteminate Structures.pdf
 
analisa struktur indo
analisa struktur indoanalisa struktur indo
analisa struktur indo
 
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajape
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajapeUnit 3 flexibility-anujajape
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajape
 
L04 5.pdf (trusses)
L04 5.pdf (trusses)L04 5.pdf (trusses)
L04 5.pdf (trusses)
 
structure analysis
structure analysisstructure analysis
structure analysis
 
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406
Structural engineering &amp; softwatre application ce406
 
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes methodsolving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture by stiffnes method
 
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes methodsolving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes method
solving statically indeterminate stucture using stiffnes method
 
I012274853
I012274853I012274853
I012274853
 
Trusses
TrussesTrusses
Trusses
 
Trusses
TrussesTrusses
Trusses
 
Trusses
TrussesTrusses
Trusses
 
Fq3410471053
Fq3410471053Fq3410471053
Fq3410471053
 

Dernier

Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...ranjana rawat
 
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)simmis5
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...Christo Ananth
 
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghlyKubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghlysanyuktamishra911
 
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Christo Ananth
 
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsRussian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escortsranjana rawat
 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
result management system report for college project
result management system report for college projectresult management system report for college project
result management system report for college projectTonystark477637
 
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptx
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptxIntroduction and different types of Ethernet.pptx
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptxupamatechverse
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSSIVASHANKAR N
 
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSISUNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSISrknatarajan
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINEMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINESIVASHANKAR N
 
AKTU Computer Networks notes --- Unit 3.pdf
AKTU Computer Networks notes ---  Unit 3.pdfAKTU Computer Networks notes ---  Unit 3.pdf
AKTU Computer Networks notes --- Unit 3.pdfankushspencer015
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete Record
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete RecordCCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete Record
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete RecordAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 

Dernier (20)

Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
Water Industry Process Automation & Control Monthly - April 2024
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Manchar 8250192130 Will You Miss This Cha...
 
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
Java Programming :Event Handling(Types of Events)
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
 
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...
Call for Papers - Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, E-ISSN: 21...
 
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghlyKubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
 
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
 
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsRussian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Russian Call Girls in Nagpur Grishma Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Isha Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park  6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Koregaon Park 6297143586 Call Hot Ind...
 
result management system report for college project
result management system report for college projectresult management system report for college project
result management system report for college project
 
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptx
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptxIntroduction and different types of Ethernet.pptx
Introduction and different types of Ethernet.pptx
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLSMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-5 NC MACHINE TOOLS
 
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSISUNIT-III FMM.        DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
UNIT-III FMM. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
 
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINEMANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS-II UNIT-2 LATHE MACHINE
 
AKTU Computer Networks notes --- Unit 3.pdf
AKTU Computer Networks notes ---  Unit 3.pdfAKTU Computer Networks notes ---  Unit 3.pdf
AKTU Computer Networks notes --- Unit 3.pdf
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
 
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete Record
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete RecordCCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete Record
CCS335 _ Neural Networks and Deep Learning Laboratory_Lab Complete Record
 

Analysis of structures

  • 1. Analysis of Structures Prof. Dr. Ahmed Hasan Zubydan
  • 2. Analysis of Structures B Prof. Dr. Ahmed Hasan Zubydan Professor of Structural Engineering Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering PortSaid University.
  • 3. Contents Chapter 1 Statics of Structures 1.1 Supports and Reactions 1.2 Stability and Determinancy 1.3 Condition Equations 1.4 Computation of Reactions Chapter 2 Trusses 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Trusses Configuration 2.3 Condition Equations 2.4 Stability and Determinancy 2.5 Methods of Analysis of Simple and Compound Trusses 2.6 Method of Joints 2.7 Method of Sections 2.8 Complex Trusses 2.9 Graphical Method of Joints (Maxwell Diagram) Chapter 3 Statically Determinate Beams and Frames 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Axial Force, Shear Force, and Bending Moment Diagrams 3.3 Relationship between Load, Shear, and Bending Moment Chapter 4 Influence Lines for Statically determinate Structures 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Applications of Influence Lines 4.3 Distributed Load 4.4 Concentrated Load 4.5 Maximum Absolute Bending Moment 1 1 2 4 15 31 31 31 32 33 45 45 58 80 84 103 103 104 125 187 187 246 247 250 256
  • 4.
  • 5. 1 Statics of Structures 1.1 SUPPORTS AND REACTIONS Reaction forces are developed at supports of a structure to equilibrate the effect of the applied forces. The supports through which a structure transmits its load to the supporting foundation can be classified as follows: Roller support: This support provides restraint against linear movement in the direction normal to supporting surface as shown in Fig. 1.1a. The magnitude of the resultant reaction force at node a is given directly by Ra. The direction of Ra is perpendicular to the roller surface and the point of application is at point a. Hinge support: It constrains all translations at the point of attachment, but the structure is free to rotate about this point. The unknown independent reaction components are Ya and Xa as shown in Fig 1.1b. Fixed support: It constrains the point of attachment from translation and rotation. With this type of supports, there are three unknowns. The unknowns are two reaction forces Xa and Ya in addition to a fixing moment Ma as shown in Fig. 1.1c. Guide support: It constrains the structure from rotation and translation normal to the guide slot as shown in Fig. 1.1d. Thus, while there is no reactive forces parallel to the slot, there is an unknown force normal to the slot (Ra) and an unknown bending moment at the support (Ma). (a) Roller support Ra a Ra a
  • 6. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.2 (b) Hinge support (c) Fixed support (d) Guide support Fig. 1.1 Symbols for various support types 1.2 STABILITY AND DETERMINANCY A structure is considered geometrically stable if for any incipient movement, due to any conceivable system of applied loads, an elastic resistance to this movement is immediately developed. A structure is considered statically determinate if the external reactions and the internal member forces can be determined only by considering the equations of statical equilibrium without any references to the elastic properties of the structural members. A rigid planar structure can be acted upon by a general system of forces that can be combined into a single force and a single moment. For statical stability and determinancy, the number and arrangement of reactions must be such that they keep the external forces in equilibrium. Since there are three equations of static equilibrium (  Fx = 0,  Fy = 0,  M = 0) for planar structures, there must be three components of reactions, which are neither parallel nor concurrent. If the components of reactions are less than three, the structure is unstable. If the number of reaction components is three, and if those components are neither parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and determinate. If the number of reaction components is greater than three, and if the components are arranged such that they are neither parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and statically indeterminate. The degree of external indeterminancy is defined as the number of unknown reactions in excess of the number of the available equations of statics plus the number of equations of construction. The conditions are summarized in the following criteria: r < 3; structure is statically unstable externally r = 3; structure is statically determinate externally r > 3; structure is statically indeterminate externally where r is the total number of unknown reaction components. The preceding criteria must be applied with some discretion. If r < 3, the structure is definitely unstable; however, in cases where r  3, the structure is not necessarily stable. It is Ya Xa aXa Ya a Ya Xa Ma a Ma Xa a
  • 7. Statics of structures 3 o o Link possible that the reaction components are not properly arranged to ensure external stability. These structures category are geometrically unstable. Figures 1.2 to 1.4 gives the statical classification of several structures. The simple beam shown in Fig. 1.2a is unstable because the number of reaction components is less than three (r = 2). Since the beam shown of Fig 1.2b has no reaction to equilibrate the horizontal component of the applied loading, the structure will move horizontally if any horizontal load acts on the beam. On the other hand, the structures shown in Figs. 1.2c and 1.2d have the supports arranged so that the lines of action of all three reactions intersect at one point. So, the structures shown in Figs. 1.2a to 1.2d are geometrically unstable. The structures shown in Figs. 1.3a to 1.3f have three reaction components that are neither parallel nor concurrent. Therefore, they are stable and statically determinate. Finally, the structures shown in Figs 1.4a to 1.4c have more than three reaction components. These reaction components are neither parallel nor concurrent, so these structures are stable and statically indeterminate. (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 1.2 Unstable structures (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 1.3 Stable and statically determinate structures (a) (b) (c) Fig. 1.4 Stable and statically indeterminate structures
  • 8. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.4 1.3 CONDITION EQUATIONS Some structures incorporate unique internal features of construction that significantly affect the behavior of the system and require special attention from the structural engineer. For example, the beam shown in Fig. 1.5a has an internal hinge at b. This hinge results in no bending moment transmission through the beam at point b. The free body diagrams for the two beam segments ab and bc indicates that  Mb = 0 for the two individual free-body diagrams. The one independent equation introduced by the condition of construction is referred to as an equation of condition. For the intermediate roller of Fig. 1.5b, only the force normal to the axes of the beams will be transmitted. This gives two equations of condition since the force parallel to the longitudinal axis of the beam and the moment are both zero at the roller. Thus for a structure with c condition equations, the following criteria is applied: r < 3 + c ; structure is statically unstable externally r = 3 + c ; structure is statically determinate externally r > 3 + c ; structure is statically indeterminate externally (a) (b) Fig. 1.4 Condition equations The number of condition equations given by an intermediate hinge depends on the number of sides that is connected by this hinge. Generally, the number of condition equations c is given as c = n – 1 ………………………………………………(1.1) in which n is the number of sides which is connected with the hinge. For example, the hinge given in Fig. 1.6a gives one condition equation because this hinge connects two sides. On the other hand, the hinges shown in Figs 1.6b and 1.6c give two and three condition equations, respectively. (a) One condition equation (b) Two condition equations (c) Three condition equations Fig. 1.6 Number of condition equations given by intermediate hinge. Hinge a b c Roller n = 2; c= 1 n = 2; c = 1n = 2; c = 1 n = 2; c = 1 n = 3; c= 2 n = 3; c= 2 n =4; c =3
  • 9. Statics of structures 5 The frames that contain closed panels require an internal classification in addition to the external classification. Each closed panel requires three internal condition equations to be solved. Let e be the number of internal condition equations for a closed panel. Then, the following condition prevail for each closed panel. e > 3; structure is statically unstable internally e = 3; structure is statically determinate internally e < 3; structure is statically indeterminate internally The stability of the frames that contain closed forms can also be determined by cutting the structure more than one part and by determining the stability of each portion, the whole stability of the structure is evaluated. EXAMPLE 1.1 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 3 3 + c > r unstable Structure (b) 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 5 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate Structures (c) and (d) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r a b c b' a b c r1 r2
  • 10. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.6 For structure (c), the node b can moves a short distance perpendicular to the line ac without any resistance of members ab or bc. Hence, the structural system (c) is geometrically unstable since the shape of the structure can be altered without any change in length of any member. The structure (c) is said to be the critical form. This situation does not exist in the stable structure (d) since the two arcs r1 and r2 have no common tangent and any incipient movement of b will generate an immediate resistant from the various parts of the structure. EXAMPLE 1. 2 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) Structure (a) has no resistance against horizontal loads, so this structure is unstable Structure (b) 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 4 3 + c > r unstable Structure (c) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 5 3 + c < r stable and statically indeterminate to the second degree
  • 11. Statics of structures 7 EXAMPLE 1.3 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structures (a), (b), and (c) 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 5 3 + c = r It is noticed that the part abc of the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is unstable. On the other hand, structures (a) and (c) are stable and statically determinate. Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 5 3 + c > r unstable EXAMPLE 1.4 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) a b c
  • 12. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.8 a b a b (c) (d) SOLUTION Structures (a), (b), and (c) These structures are unstable because the reaction components are concurrent. Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 5 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate EXAMPLE 1.5 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate Structure (b) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate
  • 13. Statics of structures 9 a b c d Structure (c) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a vertical component, so this part is unstable. Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 6 3 + c < r The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a horizontal component, so this part is unstable. EXAMPLE 1.6 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate e = 3 internally stable and statically determinate
  • 14. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.10 a b c e = 3 e = 3 c Structure (b) The part abcd couldn’t resist any lateral loads. So the structure is unstable. Another way for detecting the stability of the structure by dividing it into two portions as shown in figure and assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one. It is noticed that the upper portion is stable and statically determinate while part ab of the lower portion is unstable. So the structure is unstable Structure (c) When the structure is divided into two portions and assuming that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, portion bdef is stable and statically determinate. On the other portion, part ahg is a critical form, so the structure is unstable. Structure (d) When the structure is divided into two portions and assuming that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each of the two portions is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stbale and statically determinate. EXAMPLE 1.7 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy. (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION a b c d 3 + c = 4 r = 4 a b b d e f f gh 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4
  • 15. Statics of structures 11 e =3 e =3 Structures (a) and (b) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 6 3 + c = r The part abc on the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is unstable. On the other hand, structure (a) is stable and statically determinate. Structure (c) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 external condition equation is given by hinge at c 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate It is also noticed that each closed form has three condition equations (e = 3 ), so the structure is internally stable and statically determinate. Structure (d) When the structure is divided into two portions and assuming that the upper portion carrying the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each of the two portions is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. EXAMPLE 1.8 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) 3 + c = 3; r = 3 3 + c = 5 r = 5
  • 16. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.12 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate Since each closed form has three condition equations, then the structure is internally stable and statically determinate Structure (b) Dividing the structure into three portions and assuming that each portion resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. Structure (c) 3 + c = 3 + 4 = 7 r = 7 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate EXAMPLE 1.9 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 3 r = 3
  • 17. Statics of structures 13 a b c e = 3 d e Structure (a) Dividing the structure into three portions as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. Structure (b) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 6 3 + c = r stable and statically determinate Structure (c) Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that the upper portion carrying the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 7 3 + c < r stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree EXAMPLE 1.10 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy (a) (b) (c) (d) SOLUTION 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 5 r = 5
  • 18. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.14 a b Structure (a) Dividing the structure into three portions as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. Structure (b) Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, the lower portion is stable and statically determinate while the upper portion is stable and statically indeterminate to the second degree. By summing the two portions once again, the structure is stable and statically indeterminate to the second degree. Structure (c) Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that, the upper portion is stable and statically determinate while lower portion is unstable. Then, the structure is unstable. Structure (d) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 external condition equation is given by the hinge at d 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate. e = 3 internally stable and statically determinate. EXAMPLE 1.11 Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 4 r = 4 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 5 r = 7 3 + c = 4 r = 3 3 + c = 4 r = 4
  • 19. Statics of structures 15 a (c) (d) SOLUTION Structure (a) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 5 3 + c > r unstable. Structure (b) 3 + c = 3 + 3 = 6 r = 6 3 + c = r In this structure, the column ab couldn’t resist any lateral loading, so the structure is unstable. Structure (c) 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 3 (the condition equation is given by the hinge at a) 3 + c > r unstable. It is noticed that the condition equation given by the hinge at a couldn’t be used to find the additional reaction component. Moreover, the part abc couldn’t resist any lateral loading. So, the structure is unstable Structure (d) Dividing the structure into two portions as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically determinate. 1.4 COMPUTATION OF REACTIONS The equations of static equilibrium play a vital role in determining the reactions for any structure. If the structure is statically determinate externally, these equations provide all whate e = 3 3 + c = 3 r = 3 3 + c = 4 r = 4
  • 20. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.16 is needed for the solution, whereas for statically indeterminate cases, the equations of equilibrium remain applicable, but they are not sufficient for the solution. In determining the reactions, a free-body diagram (FBD)of the entire structure is constructed. All given forces are shown to act in their prescribed direction, and each unknown reaction component is assumed to act in a specified direction. The equations of static equilibrium are applied in consistency with the assumed directions, and these equations are solved for the unknown reactions. If the solution yields a positive reaction component, then the assumed direction is correct, whereas a negative result indicates that the opposite direction is correct. In the latter case, care must be exercised in subsequent calculations. If the negative sign is retained, then the originally assumed direction must also be retained. However, the direction can be reversed on the free-body diagram and a positive sign can then be used in subsequent steps. EXAMPLE 1.12 Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The reaction at b has two unknown components, whereas the reaction at point e has only a single unknown component as shown in the figure. Determination of Reactions  Px = 0: (→+) Xb = 0  Me = 0: Yb  9 – 20  12 – 50  6 – 30  4 = 0 Yb = 73.3 kN  Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yb – 20 – 50 –30 = 0 Ye + 73.3 – 20 – 50 –30 = 0 Ye = 26.7 kN The positive sign indicates that the reaction components act in the assumed direction on the free-body diagram. 20 kN 50 kN 30 kN Yb Ye Xb b e a b dc 3 m 4 m 20 kN 50 kN 30 kN 3 m 2 m e
  • 21. Statics of structures 17 EXAMPLE 1.13 Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The distributed load is replaced by a resultant concentrated force applied at its centroidal position. The unknown reaction components are also shown. Determination of Reactions  Px = 0: (→+) Xd = 0  Md = 0: Ya  6 – 60  5 + 60 = 0 Ya = 40 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yd + Ya – 60 = 0 Yd + 40 – 60 = 0 Yd = 20 kN EXAMPLE 1.14 Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The inclined force is shown resolved into two components. 60 kN.m 60 kN Ya Yd 1m a Xdd 40 kN Xa Ya Ye 48 kN 36 kN 50 kN a e 2.5 m a b d c 3 m 2 m 1 m 60 kN.m 40 kN/m 4 3 fed a b 2 m 3 m 60 kN40 kN 10 kN/m 2 m3 m 1 m
  • 22. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.18 Determination of Reactions  Px = 0: (→+) – Xd + 36 = 0 Xd = 36 kN  Me = 0: Ya  8 – 40  5 – 48  2 + 50  0.5 = 0 Ya = 33.9 kN  Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0 Ye + 33.9 – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0 Ye = 104.1 kN EXAMPLE 1.15 Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The structure is separated into three separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and internal forces at the hinges are shown in the figure. Determination of Reactions Free body ce The free body diagram ce is treated as a simply supported beam and thus inherently use the equilibrium conditions. The reactions (internal forces transferred at hinges) are Xc = Xe = 0 ; Yc = Ye = 7.5 kN Free body abc  Px = 0: (→+) Xa = 0 15 kN 10 kN 15 kN Ya Y b Y f Yi Xa Yc Ye Xc Xe Xc Xe 40 kN 4m a b c e f i c e b 2 f i hgedc 2 3 m 15 kN 10 kN 15 kN 5 kN/m 6 m a 2 2 2 2
  • 23. Statics of structures 19  Mb = 0: Ya  6 – 40  2 + Yc  2 = 0 Ya  6 – 40  2 + 7.5  2 = 0 Ya = 10.8 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yb + Ya – Yc – 40 = 0 Yb + 10.8 – 7.5 – 40 = 0 Yb = 36.7 kN Free body efi  Mi = 0: Yf  7 – Ye  9 – 10  5 – 15  2 = 0 Yf  7 – 7.5  9 – 10  5 – 15  2 = 0 Yf = 21.1 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yi + Yf – Ye – 10 –15 = 0 Yi + 21.1 – 7.5 – 10 –15 = 0 Yi = 11.4 kN EXAMPLE 1.16 Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The structure is broken into two separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and internal forces at the hinge are shown in figure. Determination of Reactions Free body def  Px = 0: (→+) Xd – 20 = 0 Xd = 20 kN  Me = 0: Yd  5 + 40  2 – 37.5  1.67 = 0 40 kN 40 kN 20 kN Y a Xc Yc Y e 40 kN Yd Xd Xd a c d d e 37.5 kN 2m 1.67m f a 10 kN/m d f e b c 4 m 4 m 5 m 2 m 40 kN 40 kN 20 kN 15 kN/m 1
  • 24. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.20 Yd = – 3.5 kN  Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yd – 37.5 – 40 = 0 Ye – 3.5 – 37.5 – 40 = 0 Ye = 81 kN Free body acd  Px = 0: (→+) Xc – Xd = 0 Xc – 20 = 0 Xc = 20 kN  Mc = 0: Ya  8 + Yd  1 – 40  6 – 40  4 = 0 Ya  8 –3.5  1 – 40  6 – 40  4 = 0 Ya = 50.4 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yc + Ya – Yd – 40 – 40 = 0 Yc + 50.4 + 3.5 – 40 – 40 = 0 Yc = 26.1 kN EXAMPLE 1.17 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram The reactions of the link members are shown in their components that are function of the force in the link member and the inclination of the link. 2.83 2.83 2/2.83 F e 40 kN.m 20 kN Ya 2/2.83 F e a c e 2/2.83 F d 2/2.83 F d Fd Fe d f 2 2 2 2 b 20 kN 3 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m40 kN.m a c d e f
  • 25. Statics of structures 21 Determination of Reactions  Mc = 0: Ya  5 + 20  2 – 40 = 0 Ya = 0  Me = 0: 2/2.83 Fd  4 – 40 = 0 Fd = 14.1 kN  Px = 0: (→+) – 2/2.83 Fe + 2/2.83 Fd = 0 Fe = Fd Fe = 14.1 kN EXAMPLE 1.18 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION Free body diagram Determination of Reactions  Mf = 0: 4/4.47 Fa  10 + 40 – 60  8 = 0 Fa = 49.2 kN  Px = 0: (→+) – Xf + 2/4.47 Fa = 0 – Xf + 2/4.47  49.2 = 0 Xf = 22 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yf + 4/4.47 Fa – 60 – 120 = 0 Yf + 4/4.47  49.2 – 60 – 120 = 0 Yf = 136 kN 2 m 5 m 3 m 3 m 4 m 40 kN.m 60 kN 20 kN/m a bc d e f 40 kN.m 60 kN 2/4.47 F a 4/4.47 F a Xf Yf Fa a b d 120 kN 3 m f 2 4 4.47 4 3 5
  • 26. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.22 EXAMPLE 1.19 Calculate the reactions for the frame shown. SOLUTION Free body diagram Determination of Reactions  Px = 0: (→+) Xa – 30 – 10 = 0 Xa = 40 kN  Mf = 0: Ya  10 – 20  12 – 72  7 – 30  5.5 – 10  4= 0 Ya = 94.9 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yf + Ya – 20 – 72 = 0 Yf + 94.9 – 20 – 72 = 0 Yf = – 2.9 kN EXAMPLE 1.20 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION 2 m 6 m 4 m 4 m 1.5 m 10 kN 20 kN 30 kN12 kN/m on Hal a bc d e f 1.5 m 10 kN 20 kN 30 kN Xa Ya Yf fa 72 kN 3 m 1 m 4 m 15 kN 50 kN 10kN/m a b c d 3 m 3 m
  • 27. Statics of structures 23 Free-Body Diagram Determination of Reactions  Mc (left)= 0: Yb  6 – 15  7 – 50  3 = 0 Yb = 42.5 kN  Mc (bottom)= 0: Xd  4 – 40  2= 0 Xd = 20 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yd + Yb – 15 – 50 = 0 Yd + 42.5 – 15 – 50 = 0 Yd = 22.5 kN  Px = 0: (→+) Xb + Xd – 40 = 0 Xb + 20 – 40 = 0 Xb = 20 kN EXAMPLE 1.21 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION Free body diagram 15 kN 50 kN 40 kN Xb Yb Xd Yd 2 m b c d  Mc (left) = 0  Mc (bottom) = 0 2 m 4 m 1 m 4 m 20 kN 15 kN/m 18 kN/m a b c d e 20 kN 60 kN Xa Ya Xe Ye 36 kN 8/3 2 m 30 kN 1 m a e c  Mc (left) = 0
  • 28. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.24 Determination of Reactions  Mc (left)= 0: Ya  2 – Xa  5 – 30  1 = 0 ……………………….………(a)  Me = 0: Ya  6 – Xa  1 + 20  4 – (15  6)  3 – 36  8/3 = 0 ……(b) Solving (a) and (b), Xa = 14 kN; Ya = 50 kN  Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – (15  6) = 0 Ye = 40 kN  Px = 0: (→+) – Xe + Xa + 20 – 36 = 0 Xe = – 2 kN EXAMPLE 1.22 Calculate the reactions for the frame shown. SOLUTION Free body diagram Determination of Reactions  Me (bottom)= 0: Xg  6 + 80  3 = 0 Xg = – 40 kN  Md (right)= 0: Yg  6 – Xg  9 - 80  6 – 35  8 – 53.67  3 = 0 Yg  6 + 40  9 – 80  6 – 35  8– 53.67  3 = 0 Yg = 93.5 kN 2 m 6 m 2 m 3 m 20 kN 30 kN 35 kN 40 kN 80 kN 8 kN/m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m a b c d e f g 20 kN 30 kN 35 kN 40 kN 80 kN Xa Ya Ma Xg Yg a e g d 53.67 kN 3 m  Me (bottom) = 0  Md (right) = 0
  • 29. Statics of structures 25  Ma = 0: Ma – Yg  12 – 80  3 – 35  8 +35  14 + 53.67  9+ 30  6 + 40  3 – 20  2 = 0 Mg = 129 kN.m  Py = 0: (+) Ya + Yg – 20 – 40 –30 – 53.67 – 35 = 0 Ya = 85.2 kN  Px = 0: (→+) Xa – Xg – 80 = 0 Xa = 40 kN EXAMPLE 1.23 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION Free-Body Diagram Determination of Reactions Free Body defg  Mo = 0: 2/3.61 Fcf  4.5 – 3/3.61 Fcf  7 + 30  3 + 40  7 – 15  4.5 = 0 Fcf = 90.9 kN  Px = 0: (→+) – 2/3.61 Fbe + 2/3.61 Fcf – 15 = 0 – 2/3.61 Fbe + 2/3.61  90.9 – 15 = 0 Fbe = 63.9 kN 3 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 3 m 30 kN 40 kN 15 kN 8 kN/m a b c d e f g 3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf 2/3.61Fcf2/3.61Fbe e f 2/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fbe 2/3.61Fcf 3/3.61Fcf b c 2 3 3.61 30 kN 40 kN 15 kN 40 kN Yd Xa Ya Ma 3/3.61Fcf 2/3.61Fcf 3/3.61Fbe 2/3.61Fbe a d e f b c 2/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf 2/3.61Fcf g o 4.5m 2.5 m
  • 30. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.26  Py = 0: (+) Yd + 3/3.61 Fcf – 3/3.61 Fbe – 30 – 40 = 0 Yd + 3/3.61  90.9 – 3/3.61  64 – 30 – 40 = 0 Yd = 47.5 kN Free Body abc  Ma = 0: Ma – 40  2.5 + 3/3.61 Fbe  5 – 3/3.61 Fcf  9 = 0 Ma – 40  2.5 + 3/3.61  64  5 – 3/3.61  90.9  9 = 0 Ma = 515 kN.m  Px = 0: (→+) Xa + 2/3.61 Fbe – 2/3.61 Fcf = 0 Xa + 2/3.61  64 – 2/3.61  90.9 = 0 Xa = 15 kN  Py = 0: (+) Ya – 40 + 3/3.61  Fbe – 3/3.61  Fbe = 0 Ya + 40 + 3/3.61  64 – 3/3.61  90.9 = 0 Ya = 62.5 kN EXAMPLE 1.24 Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. SOLUTION Free body diagram Determination of Reactions  Mi (right)= 0: Yk  4 – 48  2 = 0 Ya = 24 kN  Mh = 0: Ya  9 – 15  11 – (8  9)  4.5 – 10  7 + 10  2 + 48  4 – Yk  6 = 0 Ya  9 – 15  11 – (8  9)  4.5 – 10  7 + 10  2 + 48  4 – 24  6 = 0 Ya = 54.6 kN 2 m 3 m 6 m 2 m 4 m 4 m 3 m 15 kN 10 kN 10 kN 8 kN/m 12 kN/m a bc d e f g h i j k 15 kN 10 kN 10 kN 48 kN Xa Ya Yk Xh Yh a h i k 48 kN 2m 24 kN e 1.5m 3m  Mi (right) = 0  Me (left) = 0
  • 31. Statics of structures 27  Me (left)= 0: Xa  7 – Ya  3 + 15  5 + 24  1.5 = 0 Xa  7 – 54.6  3 + 15  5 + 24  1.5 = 0 Xa = 7.5 kN  Px = 0: (→+) – Xh + Xa – 10 = 0 – Xh + 7.5 – 10 = 0 Xh = – 2.5 kN  Py = 0: (+) Yh + Ya + Yk – 15 – (8  9) – 10 – 48 = 0 Yh + 54.6 + 24 – 15 – (8  9) – 10 – 48 = 0 Yh = 66.4 kN
  • 32. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.28 a b c d e f 2 m 2 m 2 m 4 m 2 m 20 kN 30 kN.m 15 kN/m1 1 a b c d 1.5 m 2.0 m 30 kN 40 kN 15 kN/m e 1.5 m 1.5 m Problems Calculate the reactions for the following structures: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 10 kN/m a c b 7 m 3 m 20 kN 1 2 6 kN/m a b 5 m 2 m c b f ged c 3 m 3 m 20 kN 30 kN 8 kN/m 6 m 5 m 2 m 2 m a bc d 1 m 4 m 2 m 10 kN 8 kN/m 2 m6 m 3 m 3 m 40 kN.m 40 kN 10 kN/m a b c d e f 2 m a b c d 3 m 2 m 4 m 3 m 40 kN 10 kN/m 20 kN 3 m f e 20 kN a b c d e 2 m 4 m 2.5 m 40 kN 60 kN 20 kN/m 2.5 m 3 m 3 m 4 m a b c d e f g 1.5 m 5 m 3 m 2 m 6 m 60 kN 80 kN 30 kN/m
  • 33. Statics of structures 29 (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) a b c d e f g h 3 m 4 m 3 m 4 m 2 m 4 m 30 kN.m 20 kN 20 kN 10 kN/m a b c d e 2 m 4 m 2 m 2 m 40 kN 20 kN/m 10kN/m a b c d e f g 6 m 2 m 4 m 2 m 4 m 15 kN 60 kN 30 kN/m 20 kN a bc d e f g h i 1 m 8 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 30 kN 20 kN/m 10kN/m 20 kN 1 m 4 m 20 kN 10kN/m a b c d 2 m 4 m 10 kN/m e a b c d e f g 3 m 2 m 4 m 2 m 4 m 60 kN 30 kN/m 20 kN 3 m 2 m 6 m 4 m 4 m 20 kN 30 kN20 kN/m on Hal a bc d e f 1.5 m 1.5 m10 kN a b c d e f 3 m 3 m 2 m 4 m 25 kN 20 kN/m 3 m
  • 34. Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.30 (19) (20) 2 m 4 m 3 m 2 m 3 m 3 m 20 kN 20 kN 90 kN 20 kN /m a b cd e f g h i 1.5 1.5 a b c d e f g h i j 3 m 3 m 1.5 m 2 m 2 m 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN 20 kN/m 1.5 m
  • 35. 2 Statically Determinate Trsses 2.1 Introduction Trusses consist of straight members joined together at their ends by joints assumed incapable of resisting any moment, that is, frictionless pins. However, the joints of actual trusses used in construction do possess a certain amount of rigidity leading to a certain amount of restraint rotation. The assumption of joints behaving as frictionless pins greatly simplifies the analysis of a truss. Furthermore, extensive theoretical and experimental investigations indicate that the error introduced by this assumption is insignificant when loaded at their joints. To avoid eccentricity at joints, the centroidal axis of each member is straight and coincides with the line connecting the joint centers at all ends of the members. Simple analysis of an idealized truss results in purely axial forces in the members of the truss that is either tensile or compressive. 2.2 TRUSSES CONFIGURATION The simplest form of a stable planar truss is a triangle arrangement of three members as shown in Fig. 2.1a. Each additional joint can be obtained by adding two bars to the joints already formed. Such a truss is called a simple truss. These trusses are always composed of triangular shapes as shown in Figs. 2.1a and 2.1b. (a) (b) (c) Fig. 2.1 Examples of simple trusses A compound truss consists of two or more simple trusses joined so that relative motion of the components is constrained. Three conditions of connectivity are required to prevent relative translation and rotation. Two simple plane trusses are combined together by three nonparallel nonconcurrent bars to form a compound truss as shown in Fig. 2.2a. Since two a b c a b c d e a b c d e f
  • 36. 32 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. bars can be replaced by a common hinge, a compound truss can also be formed by joining together two plane trusses with a common hinge and bar, as shown in Figs. 2.2b and 2.2c. Trusses that cannot be classified as either simple or compound are called complex trusses as shown in Fig.2.2d. (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 2.2 Compound and complex trusses 2.3 CONDITION EQUATIONS As discussed in Chapter 1, three independent reaction components can be determined for a planar system through the systematic application of the equations of static equilibrium. Additional reaction components can be determined if there are internal conditions that permit the expression of special condition equations. In the case of truss structures, the conditions might take a number of forms. The structure of Fig. 2.3a is a statically determinate stable truss, and the three reaction components can be determined from statics. If an additional part dc is added to truss ab, then an additional condition is required to evaluate the additional reaction component at c. This condition, which is Md = 0 for the left or right portion of the truss, is provided from the connected hinge at d. If an additional reaction component is added to point d, as shown in Fig. 2.3c, the intermediate hinge at e provides an additional condition to allow the determination of the additional reaction component. The absence of diagonal member in a truss panel, under proper support conditions, introduces a condition as shown in Fig. 2.3d. In this case, a section through panel bc reveals that no vertical force component can be transferred through this panel. This condition, coupled with the overall equations of equilibrium, enables one to determine the reaction components. a b c d e f Hinge b c a
  • 37. Statically determinate trusses 33 (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 2.3. Condition equations for trusses 2.4 STABILITY AND DETERMINANCY Based on the forgoing discussion, criteria can be developed concerning the statical determinancy of truss structures. First, the truss can be checked for external determinancy and stability according to the criteria developed in Chapter 1. In which, if r is taken as the actual number of reaction components and c is the number of condition equations, then the following criteria can be: r < 3 + c; truss is unstable externally r = 3 + c; truss is statically determinate externally r > 3 + c; truss is statically indeterminate externally These conditions are necessary but not sufficient conditions for statical classification. The condition equations should be properly added to enable the determination of the additional reaction components. For internal classification, in addition to the above definition for r and c, let m be the total number of bars and j the total number of joints. Then, the following conditions prevail: m + c + 3 < 2j; truss is unstable internally m + c + 3 = 2j; truss is statically determinate internally m + c + 3 > 2j; truss is statically indeterminate internally where c + 3 is the minimum required components of reactions. Care must be exercised in using the above conditions. If m + c + 3 < 2j, the truss is definitely unstable, but if m + c + 3  2j, it doesn’t necessarily follow that the truss is stable. It is possible that m bars are not properly arranged to ensure internal stability. Such trusses are said to have critical form. a b a b c d a b c d e a c b e
  • 38. 34 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. EXAMPLE 2.1 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 +3 = 10 2j = 10 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Trusses 2, 3, and 4 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 +3 = 10 2j = 10 m + c + 3 = 2j Although the stability conditions are theoretically satisfied for Trusses 2, 3, and 4, Truss 2 is geometrically unstable because it has a critical form. In this form, point b can move perpendicular to line ac without any resistance. Also, the intermediate hinge at b couldn’t be used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at c. On the other hand Trusses 3 and 4 are stable and statically determinate. EXAMPLE 2.2 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. a b c d e a b c d e a b c d e a b c d e a b c d e f a b c d e f
  • 39. Statically determinate trusses 35 Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 +3 = 12 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Trusses 2, 3, and 4 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 +3 = 12 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j Studying the condition equations of trusses 2, 3, and 4 leads to the following conclusion: Condition equation of Truss 2 Condition equation of Truss 3 Condition equation of Truss 4 The additional horizontal reaction at support a can only be determined from the condition equation of Truss 3, so, Truss 3 is stable and statically determinate while Trusses 2 and 4 are unstable. a b c d e f a b c d e f a b c  Fy = 0 a b co  Mo = 0 a b c o  Mo = 0
  • 40. 36 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. EXAMPLE 2.3 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 3 3 + c > r externally unstable Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 +3 = 16 2j = 16 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 +3 = 16 2j = 16 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 5 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 11 + 2 +3 = 16 2j = 16 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate a b c d e f g h i  Me= 0 a b c d e f g h i a b c d e f g h i  Me= 0 a b c d f g h i  Mc= 0,  Mg= 0
  • 41. Statically determinate trusses 37 EXAMPLE 2.4 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 3 3 + c > r geometrically unstable Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 1 + 3 = 13 2j = 12 m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree Trusses 3 and 4 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate EXAMPLE 2.5 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 a b c d e f  Fx = 0 a b c d e f  Fx = 0 a b c d e f a b c d e f a b c d e  Mc = 0 a b c d e  Md = 0
  • 42. 38 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Trusses 1 and 2 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r m + c + 3 = 7 + 1 + 3 = 11 2j = 10 m + c + 3 > 2j internally statically indeterminate to the first degree Although m, c, r, and j are the same for the two trusses, Truss 1 is unstable because its geometry produces a critical form. In this case, small movement of node c can occur perpendicular to the line ae without any resistance and also the condition equation at c couldn’t be used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at e. On the other hand, Truss 2 is stable and internally indeterminate to the first degree. Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 + 3 = 10 2j = 10 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 + 3 = 10 2j = 10 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate EXAMPLE 2.6 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 a b c d e a b c d e Mb = 0
  • 43. Statically determinate trusses 39 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 5 + 0 + 3 = 8 2j = 8 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15 2j = 16 m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 8 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
  • 44. 40 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. EXAMPLE 2.7 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18 2j = 18 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 + 3 = 12 2j = 12 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 4 3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree m + c + 3 = 16 + 0 + 3 = 19 2j = 18 m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 4 a  Ma = 0 a b c d e f  Mb = 0 determinate
  • 45. Statically determinate trusses 41 3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree m + c + 3 = 10 + 0 + 3 = 13 2j = 12 m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree EXAMPLE 2.8 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 + 3 = 16 2j = 16 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15 2j = 16 m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 26 + 0 + 3 = 29 2j = 28 m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree a Ma = 0
  • 46. 42 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 17 + 0 + 3 = 20 2j = 20 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate EXAMPLE 2.9 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 15 + 0 + 3 = 18 2j = 20 m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18 2j = 18 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate It is noticed that the condition equation  Fy = 0 at the shown vertical section is useful for determining the additional reaction component at c. On the other hand, the static equations (  Fy = 0 a b c o  Mo = 0
  • 47. Statically determinate trusses 43 Fx = 0,  Fy = 0,  M = 0) couldn’t be used to determine the vertical reaction at a or b because the line of action of vertical reaction at b passes through support a. For this reason, the truss is unstable. Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 4 3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 + 3 = 16 2j = 16 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 11 + 1 + 3 = 15 2j = 16 m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable EXAMPLE 2.10 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 2 = 5 r = 5 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 23 + 2 + 3 = 28 2j = 28 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate a b c d e  Md = 0,  Me = 0 a  Ma = 0
  • 48. 44 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. It should be noticed that the reaction components at b could be analyzed as internal forces in members ba and bc by the method of joint. This is necessary to activate the first condition equation ( Md (left) = 0). Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 4 3 + c < r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree m + c + 3 = 21 + 0 + 3 = 24 2j = 24 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 11 + 0 + 3 = 14 2j = 14 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate Truss 4 3 + c = 3 + 1 = 4 r = 4 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 10 + 1 + 3 = 14 2j = 14 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate EXAMPLE 2.11 Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown. Truss 1 Truss 2 Truss 3 Truss 4 SOLUTION a
  • 49. Statically determinate trusses 45 Truss 1 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22 2j = 20 m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the second degree. Truss 2 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12 2j = 14 m + c + 3 < 2j unstable Truss 3 3 + c = 3 + 0 = 3 r = 3 3 + c = r externally stable and statically determinate m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22 2j = 22 m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate. Truss 4 In this truss, it is noticed that the lines of action of all reactions intersect at point a. So, the truss is geometrically unstable. 2.5 METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF SIMPLE AND COMPOUND TRUSSES Three methods of analysis that are most common for simple and compound trusses. These are the method of joints, method of sections, and graphical method. The method of joints and the graphical method are useful when the forces in all or in the majority of the truss members are required, whereas the method of sections is more convenient if the forces in few members of the truss are required. Sometimes a combination of the method of section with the other two methods is useful, especially in the analysis of compound trusses. In some trusses, the use of the method of section is required for determining some member forces before using the other two methods. 2.6 METHOD OF JOINTS The method of joints is frequently a simple way of analyzing a statically determinate truss. In common cases, the unknown reactions can be first determined by taking the entire truss as a
  • 50. 46 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. free body. Next, the joints containing only two unknown member forces are analyzed using their free body diagrams. The two equations of static equilibrium involving summation of forces in two orthogonal directions are applied to determine the two unknown member forces at the joint. The procedure continues until all internal axial forces are computed. Since, the total number of joint equations of equilibrium is more than the number of unknown member forces, there will be surplus equations for checking purposes after member axial forces have been obtained. A number of frequently occurring special conditions can be used to shorten the calculation. These conditions are summarized in the following rules: Rule 1 With reference to Joint a, it should be noticed that members ab and ac are in the same direction. Since the joint is not loaded, it can be concluded that the force in the third member ad is zero (Fad = 0) and Fab = Fac. This fact can be verified by constructing the free-body diagram for joint a and summing the forces first in the vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction. Rule 2 With reference to the unloaded Joint e which has only two members, it can be concluded that the forces in the two members are equal to zero (Fef = 0, Feg = 0 ). This fact can be verified by summing the forces in the vertical and horizontal directions, respectively. Rule 3 For Joint k, the forces in opposite members must be equal; that is, Fkl = Fkm and Fkn = Fko. This can be demonstrated by summing the forces first in the vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction Example 2.12 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symetry: Ya = Yb = 40/2 = 20 kN  Fx = 0: Xa = 0 a Fab Fad Fac e Fef Feg k Fkl Fkn Fkm Fko 1.5 m 1.5 m 4 m 2 m 40 kN a b dc e 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 5 40 kN Ya=20 kN Yb=20 kN a b c d e Xa =0
  • 51. Statically determinate trusses 47 Joint e  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 1.5/2.5 Fde – 1.5/2.5 Fce = 0 ………….(a) 2/2.5 Fde + 2/2.5 Fce + 40 = 0 ………..(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fce = – 25kN , Fde = – 25 kN Joint c  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): From symmetry: 3/5 Fbc – 1.5/2.5  25 = 0 Fbc = 25 kN Fac + 4/5 Fbc + 2/2.5  25 = 0 Fac + 4/5 25 + 2/2.5 25 = 0 Fac = – 40 kN Fad = Fbc = 25 kN Fbd = Fac = – 40 kN Joint a  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy (+): Fab + 3/5 25 = 0 Fab = – 15 kN 40 – 4/5 25 – 20 = 0 ……………….(Check) Member forces 40 kN e Fce Fde c Fbc Fac Fce = 25 a Fac = 40 20 kN Fab Fad = 25 40 kN -15 -40 2525 -40 -25 -25 20 kN 20 kN
  • 52. 48 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Example 2.13 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): Xa  9 – 40 6 –20 12 = 0 Xa = 53.3 kN – Xb + Xa = 0 – Xb + 53.3 = 0 Xb = 53.3 kN Yb – 40 – 20 = 0 Yb = 60 kN Joint e  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): 4.5/7.5 Fde – 20 = 0 Fde = 33.3 kN – Fce - 6/7.5 Fde = 0 – Fce – 6/7.5  33.3 = 0 Fce = – 26.7 kN Joint c  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): Fcd – 40 = 0 Fcd = 40 kN – Fac – 26.7 = 0 Fac = – 26.7 kN Joint d  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): 4.5/7.5 Fbd – 4.5/7.5 Fad – 40 – 4.5/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……………………(a) – 6/7.5 Fbd – 6/7.5 Fad + 6/7.5  33.3 = 0 ………………..….…(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fbd = 66.7 kN ; Fad = – 33.3 kN 6 m 6 m 4.5 m 4.5 m 40 kN 20 kN a b d c e 6 4.57.5 6 7.54.5 40 kN 20 kNXa=53.3 kN Xb = 53.3 kN Yb=60 kN a c e d b 20 kN Fce Fde e 40 kN c 26.7Fac Fcd d 33.3 40 Fad Fbd
  • 53. Statically determinate trusses 49 Joint b  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): – Fab – 4.5/7.5  66.7 + 60 = 0 Fab = 20 kN 6/7.5  66.7 – 53.3 = 0 …………(Check) Joint a  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): 20 – 4.5/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……………(Check) 53.3 – 26.7 - 6/7.5  33.3 = 0 ……..(Check) Member forces EXAMPLE 2.14 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): Ya  6 – 50 3 = 0 Ya = 25 kN Yb – Ya – 50 = 0 Yb – 25 – 50 = 0 Yb = 75 kN Xa = 0 53.3 kN 60 kN 66.7 Fab b 53.3 kN 33.3 a 20 26.7 40 kN 20 kN -26.7 -33.3 20 -26.7 40 33.3 66.7 53.3 kN 53.3 kN 60 kN 1.5 1.5 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m f g h b d c e 50 kN a 3 3 4.24 1.5 3 3.35 3 4.5 5.41 50 kN Ya =25 kN Yb= 75 kN Xa =0 a b c d e f g h
  • 54. 50 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Joint g  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): 3/4.24 Fgh – 50 = 0 Fgh = 70.7 kN – Ffg – 3/4.24 Fgh = 0 – Ffg – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 Ffg = – 50 kN Joint h  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – 3/4.24 Feh + 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 Feh = 70.7 kN – Ffh – 3/4.24 Feh – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 – Ffh – 3/4.24  70.7 – 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 Ffh = – 100 kN Joint f  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – Fef – 50 = 0 Fef = – 50 kN – Fdf – 100 = 0 Fdf = – 100 kN Joint e  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – 1.5/3.35 Fce + 3/4.24 Fde + 3/4.2470.7 – 50 = 0 ……………………………………..(a) – 3/3.35 Fce – 3/4.24 Fde + 3/4.24  70.7 = 0 ……………………..….(b) Solving (a), (b), Fce = 37.3 kN ; Fde = 23.6 kN Joint d  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – Fcd – 3/4.243  23.6 = 0 Fcd = – 16.7 kN – Fbd – 100 + 3/4.24  23.6 = 0 Fbd = – 83.3 kN Joint c 50 kN gFfg Fhg h 70.7 Ffh Feh f 100 50 Fef Fdf e 70.7 50 Fde Fce d 10023.6 Fbd Fcd
  • 55. Statically determinate trusses 51  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 4.5/5.41 Fbc – 1.5/3.35 Fac + 1.5/3.35  37.3 – 16.7 = 0 …………………………………..(a) – 3/5.41 Fbc – 3/3.35 Fac + 3/3.35  37.3 = 0 ……………………………..…………..……(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fbc = 15 kN ; Fac = 28 kN Joint b  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – Fab – 4.5/5.41  15 = 0 Fab = –12.5 kN 75 +3/5.41  15 – 83.3 = 0 ……….(Check) Joint a  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 1.5/3.35  28 – 12.5 = 0 ………….(Check) 3/3.35  28 – 25 = 0 ………………(Check) Member forces Example 2.15 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION c 37.3 16.7 FbcFac b 83.3 75 kN 15 Fab a 12.5 28 25 kN 50 kN -12.5 28 15 -83.3 -16.7 37.3 23.6 -100 -50 70.7 -50 -100 70.7 25 kN 75 kN 3 m 4 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN f a b d c e 6 4 7.21 3 3 4.24
  • 56. 52 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Determination of Reactions  Mb :  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): Ya  4 + 10  (3 – 7 + 6 – 4)= 0 Ya = 5 kN Yb + Ya – 10 – 10 – 10 = 0 Yb + 5 – 10 – 10 –10 = 0 Yb = 25 kN – Xa + 10 +10 = 0 Xa = 20 kN Joint c  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 3/4.24 Fcd + 3/4.24 Fac + 10 = 0 ……………(a) 3/4.24 Fcd – 3/4.24 Fac – 10 = 0 …………….(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fcd = 0 ; Fac = – 14.1 kN Joint f According to rule 2; Fef = Fbf = 0 Joint e  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): Fde = 0 – Fbe – 10 = 0 Fbe = – 10 kN Joint d  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 4/7.21 Fbd + 10 = 0 Fbd = – 18 kN – Fad – 6/7.21 Fbd – 10 = 0 Fad = 5 kN Joint b  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – Fab + 4/7.21  18 = 0 Fab = – 10 kN 25 – 10 – 6/7.21  18 = 0 ……….(Check) 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN Xa =20 kN Ya=5 kN Yb=25 kN c a b f e d 10 kN c 10 kN Fcd Fac Fef f Fbf e 10 kN 0 Fbe Fde d 10 kN 10 kN 0 0 Fbd Fad b 10 018 Fab 25 kN
  • 57. Statically determinate trusses 53 Joint a  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 10 + 3/4.24  14.1 – 20 = 0 ………(Check) 5 + 5 – 3/4.24  14.1 = 0 …………(Check) Member forces EXAMPLE 2.16 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Me (left) = 0:  Fx = 0: Ya = Yi = 100 kN Xa  14 + 100  10 – Ya  20 = 0 Xa = 71.4 kN Xi = Xa = 71.4 kN Joint a  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 10/11.18 Fab + 71.4 = 0 Fab = – 79.9 kN Fac + 5/11.18 Fab + 100 = 0 Fac – 5/11.18  79.9 + 100 = 0 Fac = – 64.3 kN a 20 kN 514.1 5 kN 10 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 -14.1 5 -18 -10 20 kN 5 kN 25 kN 0 0 0 0 10.2 10 13.45 11.1 8 4 at 10 m = 40m 5 m 5 m 2 m 2 m 100 kN 100 kN f g h ia b d c e 5 10 9 10 2 5 10 11.1 8 100 kN 100 kN Xa =71.4 Ya=100 kN Xi=71.4 Yi=100 kN a b c d e g h f i a 100 kN 71.4 kN Fac Fab
  • 58. 54 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Joint c  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): 10/11.18 Fbc + 10/10.2 Fcd = 0 ……….(a) – 5/11.18 Fbc + 2/10.2 Fcd + 64.3 = 0 .(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fbc = 102.7 kN , Fcd = – 93.7 kN Joint d According to Rule 3: Fbd = – 100 kN , Fde = – 93.7 kN Joint b  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy (+): 10/13.45 Fbe + 10/11.18  79.9 – 10/11.18  102.7 = 0 Fbe = 27.5 kN 9/13.45 Fbe + 5/11.18  79.9 + 5/11.18  102.7 – 100 = 9/13.45  27.5 + 5/11.18  79.9 + 5/11.18  102.7 – 100 = 0 ………….(Check) Member forces EXAMPLE 2.17 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION c Fcd Fbc 64.3 d Fde Fbd 100 kN 93.7 b 100 79.9 102.7 Fbe 100 kN 100 kN -79. 9 -64.3 -7 9.9 -64.3 1 02.7 -100 27.5 102.7 -100 27.5 -93.7 -93.7 -93.7 -93.7 71.4 kN 100 kN 71.4 kN 100 kN 4 11.31 8.94 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 8 m 8 m 100 kN f g h a b c ed 8 8 8
  • 59. Statically determinate trusses 55 Determination of Reactions From Symmetry:  Fx (→+): Ya = Yc = 100/2 = 50 kN Xa = 0 Joint f According to Rule 2: Ffg = Fdf = 0 Joint g  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy = 0 (+): – 8/11.31 Fdg + 8/11.31 Feg = 0 …………..(a) – 8/11.31 Fdg – 8/11.31 Feg – 100 = 0 …….(b) Solving (a) and (b), Fdg = Feg = – 70.7 kN Joint a  Fy = 0 (+):  Fx = 0 (→ +): 8/8.94 Fad + 50 = 0 Fad = – 55.9 kN Fab – 4/8.94 Fad = 0 Fab + 4/8.94  55.9 = 0 Fab = – 25 kN Joint b According to rule 1: Fbd = Fbe = 0  Joint d  Fx = 0 (→ +):  Fy (+): Fde – 4/8.94  55.9 – 8/11.31  70.7 = 0 Fde = 75 kN 8/8.94  55.9 – 8/11.31  70.7 = 0 …(Check) 100 kN Ya=50 kN Yc =50 kN a c b d e f g h Xa =0 Fdf Ffg f 100 kN g FegFdg 0 0 Fad 50 kN a Fab Fbd Fbe b 25 25 Fbd Fbe b d 0 70.7 Fde 0 55.9
  • 60. 56 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.18 Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mg =0:  Md (left) = 0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya8 – Xa4 + 406 – 604 + 208 + 403 + 104 = 0 ……………...(a) Ya8 + Xa4 – 402 –604 = 0 ..(b) Solving (a) and (b), Ya = 0 ; Xa = 80 kN Yg + Ya – 60 – 40 = 0 Yg = 100 kN Xg – Xa + 40 +20 + 10 = 0 Xg = 10 kN 100 kN -25 -55.9 -25 -55.9 75 -70.7 -70.7 50 kN 50 kN 0 0 00 0 0 3 4 c 4.47 5.66 3 4 m 4 m 3 m 4 m 2 m 2 m 60 kN 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN f g a b d e 4 5 4 5 4 2 4 60 kN 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN Xa =80 Xg =10 kN Ya=0 a b c d e f g Yg =100 kN
  • 61. Statically determinate trusses 57 Joint a According to Rule 1: Fab = 80 kN , Fac = 0 Joint b  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy = 0 (+): 4/5.66 Fbd – 80 = 0 Fbd = 113.1 kN Fbc + 4/5.66 Fbd – 60 = 0 Fbc = – 20 kN Joint c  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy (+): 4/4.47 Fcd + 40 = 0 Fcd = – 44.7 kN 2/4.47 Fcd + 20 = – 2/4.47  44.7 + 20 = 0 ………. (Check) Joint g  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy =0 (+): 3/5 Ffg + 10 = 0 Ffg = – 16.7 kN Feg + 4/5 Ffg + 100 = 0 Feg – 4/5  16.7 + 100 = 0 Feg = – 86.7 kN Joint e According to rule 3: Fde = – 86.7 kN , Fef = – 10 kN Joint f  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy (+): – 3/5 Fdf + 10 + 3/5  16.7 = 0 Fdf = 33.3 kN – 4/5 Fdf – 40 + 4/5  16.7 = – 4/5  33.3 – 40 + 4/5  16.7 = 0 ….. (Check) Joint d 40 kN c 0 20 Fcd 80 kN Fab Fac a 60 kN b 80 Fbd Fbc 10 kN 100 kN g Ffg Feg 10 kN e Fde Fef 86.7 40 kN f Fdf 10 16.7
  • 62. 58 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): 20 + 3/5  33.3 + 4/4.72  44.7 – 4/5.66  113.1 = 0 …………… (Check) 86.7 – 4/5  33.3 + 2/4.72  44.7 – 4/5.66  113.1 = 0 …………… (Check) Member forces 2.7 MEHOD OF SECTIONS When the method of joints leads to a situation where no subsequent joint contains only two unknown member forces, the next approach would be to use a group of joints (called a section of the truss) as a free body. The method of sections may be used in lieu of the method of joints, even when the method of joints is possible. The three equations of statics ( Fx =0,  Fy =0, and  M =0) can be then used to calculate the unknown member forces. Example 2.19 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Fx = 0 (→+): Ya = Yh = 20  3 /2 = 30 kN Xa = 0 Section s1-s1  Me = 0  Mb = 0  Fy (+): Fbd  3 + 20  4 – 30  8 = 0; Fbd = 53.3 kN Fce  3 + 30  4 = 0; Fce = -40 kN 3/5 Fbe + 30 – 20 = 0; Fbe = – 16.7 kN 20 kN 44.7 113.1 86.7 33.3 d 60 kN 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN 80 -20 113.1 -44.7 -86.7 33.3 -10 -86.7 -16.7 80 kN 10 kN 100 kN 0 4 at 4 m=16m 3 m 20 kN 20 kN20 kN f g ha b d c e 4 35 20 kN 20 kN 20 kNYa=30 Yh=30 Xa=0 a b c d e f g h s 1 s1 s2 s 2 20 kN30 kN a b c e Fbd Fbe Fce
  • 63. Statically determinate trusses 59 Section s2-s2  Mb = 0  Ma = 0 3/5 Fac  4 + 30  4 = 0 Fac = – 50 kN Fbc  4 – 20  4 –3/5  16.7  4 = 0 Fbc = 30 kN Member forces Example 2.20 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mc =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  4 – 10  1.5 – 10  3 – 10  4.5 = 0 Ya = 22.5 kN Yc – Ya = 0 Yc = 22.5 kN – Xa + 10 + 10 + 10 = 0 Xa = 30 kN Section s1-s1  Mf = 0  Md = 0 Fdg  4 + 30  1.5 – 22.5  4 = 0 Fdg = 11.3 kN Ffi  4 + 22.5  4 – 30  1.5 = 0 Ffi = – 11.3 kN 20 kN30 kN a b 53.3 16.7Fac Fbc 20 kN 20 kN 20 kN 40 -50 53.3 30 -16.7 53.3 20 40 -16.7 30 -50 -40 -40 30 kN 30 kN 2 m 2 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN f g h i a b d c e j k 2 1.5 2.5 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN Xa =30 kN Ya =22.5 kN Yc =22.5 kN a b c d e f g h i j k s1 s 1 s2s2 10 kN 30 kN 22.5 kN 22.5 kN a b c d f Fdg Fde Fef Ffi
  • 64. 60 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Section s2-s2  Mi = 0  Fx (→+): 1.5/2.5 Feg  2 + 2/2.5 Feg  1.5+ 11.3  4 + 30  3 – 10  1.5 – 22.5  4 = 0 Feg = – 12.5 kN 2/2.5 Fei – 2/2.5 Feg + 10 – 30 = 0 Fei = 12.5 kN Member forces Example 2.21 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mg =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya18 – 4015 – 5012 – 806 = 0 Ya = 93.3 kN Yg + Ya – 40 – 50 - 80 = 0 Yg = 76.7 kN Xa = 0 Section s1-s1 10 kN 30 kN 22.5 kN 22.5 kN a b c d f 11.3 Feg Fei 11.3 e i 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 30 22.5 -18.8 18.8 -22.5 5 11.3 -15 -12.5 12.5 -11.3 3.8 -10 -6.2 6.2 -3.8 -5 30 kN 22.5 kN 22.5 kN 0 -5 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 1.5 m 3 m 50 kN 80 kN 40 kN f ga b d c e 3 3 4.24 3 4.5 5.41 1.5 6 6.18 50 kN 40 kN 93.3 kN a c b Fce Fcd Fbd o 9 m d 50 kN 80 kN 40 kN Ya =93.3 kN Yg=76.7 Xa =0 a b c d e f g s1 s1 s2 s2
  • 65. Statically determinate trusses 61  Md =0:  Mc =0:  Mo =0: Fce  4.5 + 93.3  9 – 40  6 – 50  3 = 0 Fce = – 100 kN 6/6.18 Fbd  3 + 1.5/6.18 Fbd  3 + 40  3 – 93.3  6 = 0 Fbd = 120.9 kN 4.5/5.41 Fcd  15 + 50  15 + 40  12 – 93.3  9= 0 Fcd = – 31.2 kN Section s2-s2  Mb =0:  Fy (+): Fac  3 + 93.3  3 = 0 Fac = – 93.3 kN 3/4.24 Fbc – 1.5/6.18  120.9 + 93.3 – 40 = 0 Fbc = – 33.9 kN Member forces Example 2.22 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mk =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Mf (right)=0:  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  40 – 20  10 – 10  20 = 0 Ya = 10 kN Yk – Ya = 0 Yk = 10 kN Xk  20 – Yk  20 = 0 Xk = 10 kN – Xa – Xk + 10+ 20 = 0 Xa = 20 kN 40 kN 93.3 kN a b 120.9 Fac Fbc 50 kN 80 kN 40 kN -93.3 132 -100 -33.9 -31.2 -76.7 -65.1 -40.9 108.4 120.9 126.4 93.3 kN 76.7 kN 14 .14 14.14 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 20 kN 10 kN j k f g h i a b d c e 10 10 10 10 20 kN 10 kN Xa =20 Ya =10 kN Xk=10 Yk=10 kN a b c d e f g h i j k s1 s1 s2 s2
  • 66. 62 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Section s1-s1  Mc =0:  Mf =0:  Fy =0 (+): Fde  10 + 10  10 + 20  10 – 10  10= 0 Fde = – 20 kN Fce  10 – 20  10 + 20  20 – 10  20= 0 Fce = 0 10/14.14 Fcf + Fce - 10 = 0 Fcf = 14.1 kN Section s2-s2  Mc =0:  Fx =0 (→+): Fbd  10 + 20  10 – 10  10= 0 Fbd = – 10 kN – 10/14.14 Fcd +10/14.14  14.1 + 20 – 20 = 0 Fcd = 14.1 kN Member forces Example 2.23 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  8 – 120  18 = 0 Ya = 270 kN Yb – Ya – 120 = 0 Yb = 390 kN Xa = 0 120 kN Ya=270 Yb=390 kN a b d c e f g h Xa =0 s1 s1 s2 s2 s3 s3 s4 s4 20 kN 10 kN 20 kN 10 kN Fde Fce Fcf e f d c b a 20 kN 20 kN 10 kN 0 14.1 c b a Fcd Fbd 20 kN 10 kN -10 28.3 -14.1 -20 -10 14.1 14.1 -14.1 -20 -20 20 kN 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a cb d e f g i h j k 0 8 m 6 m 6 m 6 m 8 m 5 m 3 m 120 kNf g h a b d c e 8 16 17.89 8 6 10 6 8 10 6 57.8 1 3 6 6.71
  • 67. Statically determinate trusses 63 Section s1-s1  Mf =0:  Me =0:  Mo =0: Feg  3 + 390  12 – 270  20= 0 Feg = 240 kN 6/7.81 Fdf  8+ 270  14 + 390  6 = 0 Fdf = – 234.3 kN 3/6.71 Fef  9.6 + 270  23.6 – 390  15.6 = 0 Fef = – 67.1 kN Section s2-s2  Md =0:  Mo =0: Fce  8 +390  6 – 270  14= 0 Fce = 180 kN Fde  9.6 + 390  15.6 – 270  23.6 = 0 Fde = 30 kN Section s3-s3  Mc =0:  Mp =0: 6/10 Fbd  16 + 270  8 = 0 Fbd = – 225 kN 8/10 Fcd  12 + 270  20 – 390  12= 0 Fcd = – 75 kN Section s4-s4  Mb =0:  Ma =0: 16/17.89  Fac  8 – 270  8 = 0 Fac = 301.9 kN Fbc  8 + 390  8 – 8/10  225  8 = 0 Fbc = – 210 kN 270 kN 390 kN Fce Fde 234.3 9.6 m o a b c d e 270 kN 390 kN Feg Fef Fdf 9.6 m o a b c d e f 270 kN 390 kN 180 12 m p a b c Fcd Fbd 270 kN 390 kN a b 225Fac Fbc
  • 68. 64 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces Example 2.24 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Md =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya 12 + 54 – 2012 – 206 = 0 Ya = 28.3 kN Yd + Ya – 20 – 20 = 0 Yd = 11.7 kN – Xa + 5 = 0 Xa = 5 kN Section s1- s1  Mi =0:  Ma =0:  Fy =0 (+): Fbc 6 + 52 + 206 – 28.36 – 56 = 0 Fbc = 11.7 kN 6/6.32 Fei  4 + 5  4 = 0 Fei = – 5.3 kN 2/2.83 Ffi + 2/6.32 Fei + 28.3 – 20 = 0 Ffi = – 9.4 kN Section s2- s2 120 kN -135 301.9 -225 -210 -75 30 -234.3 180 -67.1 240 -268.3 240 270 kN 390 kN 4 m 2 m 2 m 4 m 4 m 2 m 5 kN 20 kN 20 kN f g h i a b d c e 6 26.32 2 2 2.83 4 4 5.66 5 kN 20 kN 20 kN Xa=5 kN Ya =28.3 kN Yd=11.7 kN a b c d e f g h is1 s1 s2 s2 s3 s3 5 kN 20 kN 5 kN 28.3 kN b f e i Fbc Ffi Fei
  • 69. Statically determinate trusses 65  Me =0:  Fx =0 (→+): Fbf  4 + 11.7  4 – 5  4 = 0 Fbf = – 6.7 kN Fef + 11.7 + 5 – 5 – 6/6.32  5.3 = 0 Fef = – 6.7 kN Section s3- s3  Mb =0:  Fx =0 (→+): Fae  4 + 28.3  4 = 0 Fae = – 28.3 kN – 4/5.66 Fbe + 11.7 – 5 = 0 Fbe = 9.4 kN Member forces Example 2.25 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mf =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  10.5 – 40  3.5 = 0 Ya = 13.3 kN Yf + Ya – 40 = 0 Yf = 26.7 kN Xa = 0 5 kN 20 kN 5 kN 28.3 kN a b e 11.7 5.3 Fef Fbf 5 kN 28.3 kN a b 11.7 6.7 Fbe Fae 5 kN 20 kN 20 kN 5 -28.3 11.7 9.4 -6.7 -11.7 16.5 -11.7 -6.7 -5.3 -9.4 -11.7 -16.5 5 kN 28.3 kN 11.7 kN 0 0 1.5 m 2 m 3.5 m 2 m 1.5 m 2 m 1.5 m 40 kN fa b dc e1.5 2 2.5 40 kN Ya =13.3 kN Yf=26.7 kN a b c d e fs 1 s 1 Xa = 0
  • 70. 66 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Section s1-s1  Mo =0:  Mg =0: 1.5/2.5 Fab  1.5 – 2/2.5 Fab  6.375 – 26.7  2.625 = 0 Fab = – 16.7 kN 1.5/2.5 Fef  3.5 – 2/2.5 Fef  7.875 – 26.7  7.875 = 0 Fef = – 50 kN Member forces Example 2.26 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using the method of sections. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  16 + 40  14 – 100  8 = 0 Ya = 15 kN Yb + Ya – 100 = 0 Yb = 85 kN – Xa + 40 = 0 Xa = 40 kN 26.7 kN b c f o Fcd Fef Fab g 2.625 m1.125 m 40 kN-16.7 18.4 -8.9 6.1 -50 26.8 -20 -60 -40 13.3 kN 26.7 kN 6 m 2 2 6 m 2 m 4 m 8 m 100 kN 40 kN f a b d c e 8 28.25 6 6 8.49 8 2 8.25 100 kN 40 kN Xa=40 Ya=15 kN Yb=85 a b c d e f s1 s 1
  • 71. Statically determinate trusses 67 Section s1-s1  Md =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): 8/8.25 Fef  4 + 8/8.25 Fbc  4 – 2/8.25 Fbc  2 – 100  2 = 0 ……………………..……. (a) 8/8.25 Fef – 2/8.25 Fbc – 6/8.49 Fad – 100 = 0…(b) – 2/8.25 Fef + 8/8.25 Fbc – 6/8.49 Fad = 0 ……..(c) Solving (a), (b), and (c), Fef = 66 kN , Fbc = – 16.5 kN , Fad = – 45.3 kN Member forces EXAMPLE 2.27 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mf =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  9 + 40  4 –50  6 – 50  3 = 0 ; Ya = 32.2 kN Yf + Ya – 50 –50 = 0 Yf = 67.8 kN – Xf + 40 = 0 Xf = 40 kN 100 kN c d e Fef Fad Fbc 100 kN 40 kN 62.3 -45.3 19.6 -16.5 -93.3 35.8 71.6 -48 66 40 kN 15 kN 85 kN a c b d e f 3 m 3 m 3 m 4 m 50 kN 40 kN 50 kN fa b d c e 9 49.85 4 3 5 50 kN 40 kN 50 kN Ya =32.2 kN Xf=40 Yf=67.8 kN a d b c e f s1 s1
  • 72. 68 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Section s1-s1  Mf =0:  Fy (+): Fce  4 + 50  3 = 0 Fce = -37.5 kN 4/9.85 Fbf + 67.8 – 50 = 0 Fbf = – 43.8 kN Joint f  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): Fef + 67.8 – 4/9.85  43.8 = 0 Fef = – 50 kN – Fdf – 40 + 9/9.85  43.8 = 0 Fdf = 0 Joint e  Fy =0 (+):  Fx (→+): – 4/5 Fde + 50 = 0 Fde = 62.5 kN – 3/5 Fde + 37.5 = – 3/5  62.5 + 37.5 = 0 ………(Check) Member forces EXAMPLE 2.28 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION 50 kN 40 kN 67.8 kN Fad e f d Fbf Fce 40 kN 67.8 kN f 43.8 Fef Fdf e37.5 Fde 50 50 kN 40 kN 50 kN 37.5 17.8 -62.5 62.5 -43.8 -50 -37.5 32.2 kN 40 kN 67.8 kN 0 0 7.21 6 at 4 m =24 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 80 kN 30 kN j k l f g h i a b d c e 4 6 4 3 5
  • 73. Statically determinate trusses 69 Determination of Reactions  Ml =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  24 – 80  16 – 30  6 = 0 ; Ya = 60.8 kN Yl + Ya – 80 = 0 Yl = 19.2 kN Xa – 30 = 0 Xa = 30 kN Section s1-s1  Mf = 0:  Me =0:  Ma =0: 4/5 Feg  6 + 3/5 Feg  4 – 80  4 + 60.8  12 = 0 Feg = – 56.9 kN Fdf  6 + 30  6 – 60.8  8 = 0 Fdf = 51.1 kN 4/7.21 Fef  6 + 6/7.21 Fef  8 + 80  8 = 0 Fef = – 64.1 kN Joint g  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): 4/5 Fgi + 4/5  56.9 = 0 Fgi = – 56.9 kN – Ffg + 3/5  56.9 – 3/5 Fgi = 0 Ffg = 68.3 kN Joint e  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): – 4/5 Fce – 4/5  56.9 – 4/7.21  64.1 = 0 Fce = – 101.4 kN – Fde + 6/7.21  64.1 – 3/5 Fce – 3/5  56.9 = 0 Fde = 80 kN Member forces 80 kN 30 kN j k l f g h i a b d c e Ya =60.8 kN Xa =30 Yl=19.2 kN s 1 s1 80 kN 30 kN 60.8 kN a b c e d f Fef Feg Fdf Ffg 56.9 Fgi g 64.1 56.9 Fce Fde e 80 kN 30 kN 51.1 -101.4 51.1 51.1 80 25.6 -64.1 -18 68.3 25.6 25.6 -31.9 -101.4 -31.9 -56.9 -56.9 30 kN 60.8 kN 19.2 kN 0 00 0 0
  • 74. 70 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. EXAMPLE 2.29 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Fx =0 (→+): Ya = Yn = 100 kN Xa = 0 Section s1-s1  Mf = 0:  Md = 0: Fdg  6 + 40  4 – 100  8 = 0 Fdg = 106.7 kN Ffh  6 – 40  4 + 100  8 = 0 Ffh = – 106.7 kN Joint e  Fx (→+): 4/5 Feh + 4/5 Feg = 0 Feh = – Feg ……………………………….(a) Section s2-s2  Fy (+): From symmetry: 3/5 Feh – 3/5 Feg + 100 – 40 – 40 = 0 ..(b) Solving (a) and (b), Feh = – 16.7 kN Feg = 16.7 kN Fhj = Feh = – 16.7 kN (compression) Joint h  Fy (+): – Fhg + 3/5  16.7 + 3/5  16.7 = 0 Fhg = 20 kN Joint f 6 at 4 m = 24m 3 m 3 m 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN f g h i a b d c e j k l m n 3 4 5 40 kN 40 kN100 kN Ffh Fef Fde Fdg a c f db 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN Yn=100Ya =100 a b d c e f g h k j i l m nXa = 0 s 1 s 1 s 2 s 2 e Fef Fde Feh Feg 40 kN 40 kN100 kN Ffh Feh Feg Fdg a c e db Fhg 16.7 16.7 h
  • 75. Statically determinate trusses 71  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): – 4/5 Fcf – 106.7 = 0 Fcf = – 133.3 kN – Fef – 3/5 Fcf = 0 Fef = 80 kN Member forces EXAMPLE 2.30 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Fx =0 (→+): Ya = Ye = 150 kN Xa = 0 Section s1-s1  Mc = 0:  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): Fjk  12.5 + 150  10 – 100  5 = 0 Fjk = – 80 kN 5/5.59 Fch + 150 – 100 –100 = 0 Fch = 55.9 kN Fcd + Fjk + 2.5/5.59 Fch = 0 Fcd – 80 + 2.5/5.59  55.9 = 0 Fcd = 55 kN Fcf f Fef 106.7 -166.7 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 106.7 -33.3 133.3 60 -33.3 133.3 40 -16.7 80 100 kN 100 kN -133.3 -106.7 -133.3 -16.7 133.3 106.7 16.7 -106.7 20 16.7 6080 133.3 40 -1 66.7 5.59 7.91 4 at 5 m = 20 m 5 m 7.5 m 100 kN 100 kN 100 kN f g h i a b dc e j k 2.5 7.5 5 2.5 100 kN 100 kNYa=150 kN Ye =150100 kN Xa=0 a b c d e f g h i j k s1 s1 s2 s2 100 kN 100 kN150 kN a f j g b c Fjk Fch Fcd
  • 76. 72 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Joint j  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): – 7.5/7.91 Ffj – 7.5/7.91 Fgj = 0 ………….(a) – 2.5/7.91 Ffj + 2.5/7.91 Fgj – 80 = 0 …….(b) Solving (a) and (b), Ffj = – 126.5 kN ; Fgj = 126.5 kN Section s2-s2  Mb =0:  Fy (+): Ffg  5 +150  5 – 2.5/7.91  126.5  5 – 7.5/7.91  126.5  2.5= 0 Ffg = – 50 kN 5/5.59 Fbg + 150 – 100 – 7.5/7.91  126.5 = 0 Fbg = 78.3 kN Member forces EXAMPLE 2.31 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION j 80 Ffj Fgj 100 kN150 kN a f b 126.5 Ffg Fbg Fbc 100 kN 100 kN 100 kN 75 -167.7 55 33.5 78.3 55 55.9 55.9 75 78.3 33.5 -167.7 -50 -126.5 126.5 -50 126.5 -126.5 -80 150 kN 150 kN 3.61 6.71 3 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 3 m 4 m 2 m 20 kN 40 kN 40 kN f g h i a b dc e 2 3 2 1.5 2.5 6 3
  • 77. Statically determinate trusses 73 Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  3 + 40  1.5 – 40  3 – 20  6 = 0 ; Ya = 60 kN Yb – Ya – 40 – 40 = 0 Yb = 140 kN – Xa + 20 = 0 Xa = 20 kN Section s1-s1  Mg =0:  Mo =0:  Fy (+): Fab  6 + 60  1.5 – 20  6 = 0 Fab = 5 kN Ffg  6 + 20  6 + 60  3 = 0 Ffg = – 50 kN 2/2.5 Fcg – 60 = 0 Fcg = 75 kN Joint a  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): – 3/6.71 Fae + 5 – 20 = 0 Fae = – 33.5 kN Fac + 6/6.71 Fae – 60 = 0 Fac = 90 kN Joint e  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): – 2/3.61 Fce + 6/6.71  33.5 = 0 Fce = 54.1 kN Fef + 20 + 3/3.61 Fce – 3/6.71  33.5 = 0 Fef = – 50 kN Member forces 20 kN 40 kN 40 kN Xa=20 kN Ya=60 kN Yb=140 kN a b e c d f g h is1 s 1 20 kN 20 kN 60 kN Fab Ffg gf Fcg c e a 3 m o 20 kN 60 kN 5 a FacFae 20 kN Fef e Fce 33.5 20 kN 40 kN 40 kN 5 -33.5 90 11.2 -150 -50 54.1 -50 70 75 -125 70 -90.1 20 kN 60 kN 140 kN 0 0
  • 78. 74 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. EXAMPLE 2.32 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mg =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Yf  8 + 10  5 + 20  4 – 40  4 = 0 ; Yf = 3.7 kN Yg + Yf – 40 – 20 = 0 Yg = 56.3 kN – Xg + 10 = 0 Xg = 10 kN Section s1-s1  Mc =0:  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): 4/4.12 Fhi  3 + 1/4.12 Fhi 4 + 10  3 + 3.7  4 = 0 Fhi = – 11.6 kN 2/4.47 Fcf + 1/4.12 Fhi + 3.7 = 0 Fcf = – 2.1 kN Fbc + 4/4.47 Fcf + 4/4.12 Fhi + 10 = 0 Fbc = 3.1 kN Joint h  Fx (→+):  Fy (+): – 4/5 Fah – 4/4.12  11.6 + 10 = 0 Fah = – 1.6 kN – Fbh – 3/5 Fah – 1/4.12  11.6 = 0 Fbh = – 1.9 kN Joint a  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): – 2/4.47 Faf – 3/5  1.6 = 0 Faf = – 2.1 kN Fab + 4/4.47 Faf – 4/5  1.6 = 0 Fab = 3.1 kN 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 2 m 3 m 1 m 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN j f g h i a b dc e 4 1 4.12 4 35 2 4 4.47 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN Yf=3.7 kN Xg=10 kN Yg=56.3 a b f c h i j d g e s 1 s 1 10 kN 3.7 kN Fcf Fbc Fhi c ba f h h 11.6 Fbh Fah 10 kN a Fab Faf 1.6
  • 79. Statically determinate trusses 75 Member forces EXAMPLE 2.33 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Fx =0 (→+): Ya = Yp = 300 kN Xa = 0 Joint f  Fx (→+): 10/11.18 Ffk + 10/11.18 Ffi = 0 Ffk + Ffi = 0 ………………………..….….(a) Joint i  Fx (→+): – 10/11.18 Ffi – 10/11.18 Fdi = 0 Ffi + Fdi = 0 ……………………….………(b) Section s1-s1 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 3.1 -2.1 -1.6 3.1 -1.9 -1.9 68.1 -2.1 -74.8 5.6 68.1 5.65.6 -63.6 -14.1 -11.6 -11.6 3.7 kN 10 kN 56.3 kN 11 .18 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 200 kN 200 kN 200 kN 5 10 Xa=0 Yp=300 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r 200 kN 200 kN 200 kN Ya=300 s 1 s 2 s1 s 2 f Ffi Ffk Ffg Fef Fij Ffi Fdi Fhi i a b c d e g 300 kN Fad Fde Fef Ffg Fgk
  • 80. 76 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.  Fy (+): 5/11.18 Ffk – 5/11.18 Ffi – 5/11.18 Fdi + 300 – 200 = 0 Ffk – Ffi + Fdi + 223.6 = 0 ……………..…(c) Solving (a), (b), and (c), Ffk = – 74.5 kN Ffi = 74.5 kN Fdi = – 74.5 kN Section s2-s2  Md = 0:  Mg = 0: Fgk  15 + 30010 = 0 Fgk = – 200 kN Fad  15 – 300  10 = 0 Fad = 200 kN Joint d  Fy (+):  Fx (→+): Fde – 5/11.18  74.5 – 200 = 0 Fde= 233.3 kN Fdh – 10/11.18  74.5 – 200 = 0 Fdh = 266.7 kN Member forces EXAMPLE 2.34 Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION a b c d e f g 200 kN300 kN Fdh Fdi Ffi Ffk Fgk Fde 200 d 200 kN Fdh 74.5 100 166.7 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r 200 kN 200 kN 200 kN -200 200 -223.6 0 223.6 -223.6 0 233.3 266.7 -74.5 33.3 100 74.5 -74.5 -200 200 74.5 100 33.3 -74.5 74.5 -266.7 0 223.6 166.7 -33.3 -223.6 223.6 -200 -300-100 300 kN 300 kN 5 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 1 m 1 m20 kN 60 kN 40 kN f g h i a b d c e 3 1 3.16 3 4
  • 81. Statically determinate trusses 77 Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  6 + 603 – 403 – 204 = 0 Ya = 3.3 kN Yb – Ya – 60 – 40 = 0 Yb = 103.3 kN – Xb + 20 = 0 Xb = 20 kN Group cdfe  Fx (at d) =0:  Fx (at e) =0:  Fy (at d) =0:  Fy (at e) =0: Fcd = Fdf …………………………….(a) Fce = Fef ……………………..….…..(b) Fde = 1/3.16 Fcd + 1/3.16 Fde ……...(c) Fde = 1/3.16 Fce + 1/3.16 Fef ……..(d)  Fx (at c) =0:  Fy (at c) : From (a), (b), (c), and (d) Fcd = Fdf = Fce = Fef Fcd = 0.527 F From (c), Fcd = 0.333 F 1/3.16 Fcd – 1/3.16 Fce =0; Fcd = Fce Then, the group cdfe is carrying only a horizontal force. So, the group can be replaced by a link member as shown in figure.  Replacing member groups cdfe and fgih by link members, the truss becomes as shown in figure 20 kN 60 kN 40 kN Ya=3.3 kN Xb=20 Yb=103.3 a b e f h c d g i s1 s1 d e Fde FdeFcd FefFce FF c f F FFF F 0.527 F 0.333F 0.527 F0.527 F 0.527 F 20 kN 60 kN 40 kN 3.3 kN 20 kN 103.3 kN a c f i b
  • 82. 78 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Section s1-s1  Ma =0:  Mf =0:  Fy (+): Fcf  4 + 20  4 = 0 ; Fcf = – 20 kN Then, from group cdfe, we get Fcd = Fef = – 0.527  20 = – 10.5 kN, and Fde = 0.333  20 = 6.7 kN Fab  4 +3.3  3 = 0 , Fab = – 2.5 kN 4/5 Faf – 3.3 = 0 ; Faf = 4.2 kN Member forces EXAMPLE 2.35 Determine the forces in all members of the shown truss using a combination of method of sections and method of joints. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mi =0:  Fy (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  24 – 80  18 – 60  15 – 100  12 – 60  9 – 60  3 = 0 Ya = 177.5 kN Yi + Ya – 80 – 60 – 100 – 60 – 60 = 0 ; Yi = 182.5 kN Xa = 0 The given compound truss is subdivided into a primary truss and four secondary trusses as follow: 20 kN 3.3 kN a c fFcf Faf Fab 20 kN 60 kN 40 kN -2.5 4.2 -79.2 -50 -10.5 -10.5 6.7 -10.5 -10.5 15.8 15.8 -10 15.8 15.8 3.3 kN 20 kN 103.3 kN 0 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN60 kN 60 kN Ya=177.5 Yi=182.5 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN 60 kN 60 kN Xa =0
  • 83. Statically determinate trusses 79 Primary truss Secondary trusses The secondary trusses are first analyzed by the method of joints, and the forces in their members are given in the figure. The secondary trusses are supported by the primary truss. Loads that equal to the reactions of the secondary trusses must be applied at the corresponding panel points of the primary truss in the opposite direction. For example, At panel point c of the primary truss Load acting on the compound truss at c = 80 kN () Reaction at c on the secondary truss cked = 30 kN () Therefore, load transferred from the secondary truss cked to panel point c of primary truss = 30 kN () Total load acting at panel point c of the primary truss = 80 + 30 = 110 kN () At panel point e of the primary truss Load acting on the compound truss at e = 100 kN () Reaction at e on the secondary truss cked = 30 kN () Reaction at e on the secondary truss elgf = 30 kN ()] Therefore, load transferred from the secondary trusses cked and elgf to panel point e of primary truss = 30 +30 = 60 kN () Total load acting at panel point c of the primary truss = 80 + 60 = 110 kN () After all the panel-point loads are determined, the primary truss is analyzed by the method of joints or sections. The forces in the members of the given compound truss are obtained by algebraic summation of the forces in the corresponding members of the primary and secondary trusses. The final member forces are given as follows: Final member forces -258.1 -215.7 -42.4 -42.4 -251 -251 177.5 177.5 0 207.5 0 110 207.5 60 182.5 53 88.4 0 182.5 60 182.5 -42.4 60 182.5 60 95.5 130.8 -245 -245 177.5 kN 182.5 kN 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN60 kN 60 kN 000 a j c b0 0 0 0 0 -42.4 -42.4 30 30 60 30 kN60 kN30 kN c k e d -42.4 30 30 60 -42.4 30 kN60 kN30 kN e l g f -42.4 30 30 60 -42.4 30 kN60 kN30 kN g m i h -258.1 -215.7 -42.4 -42.4 -251 -251 177.5 177.5 0 207.5 0 110 207.5 60 182.5 53 88.4 0 182.5 60 182.5 -42.4 60 182.5 60 95.5 130.8 -245 -245 177.5 kN 182.5 kN 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN60 kN 60 kN
  • 84. 80 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. 2.8 COMPLEX TRUSSES The configuration of some trusses can be categorized as neither simple nor compound. For example, the truss in Fig. 2.4 is a simple, as can be demonstrated by starting with triangle abc and subsequently expanding the truss by adding two members and one joint at a time to locate joints e, d, f, and g in that order. If member eb is removed and replaced by member ag, as shown in Fig. 2.4, a different rigid truss is created that is neither simple nor compound but complex. Since this truss is statically determinate, the method of joints and the method of sections can be used for the analysis. In this case, several linear equations should be solved to get the forces in the members. The solution of this set of equations is somewhat tedious. An alternative approach is proposed by considering the force in one member of the truss as P. The forces in other members can now be obtained in terms of P. The value of P can be determined when resolving the last joint in the truss at which two different expressions of one member force are found. Once P is calculated, then the forces in all members become known. This method is illustrated numerically in Example 2.37. The virtual work method may also be used for solving complex trusses. This method is proceeded by removing one member and replacing it by another one to change the structure to a simple truss. The new simple truss can be solved by one or more of the previous method. Let the forces in the new simple truss, due to the applied forces, be F0. The applied forces are then removed and two opposite unit loads (X = 1) are applied in the direction of the removed member. The truss is now resolved for the new case of loading. The system of forces is termed F1. Let the forces in the new member be F0 and F1 from systems F0 and F1, respectively. To eliminate the effect of the new member, the final force should be zero. Therefore, F0 + X F1 = 0 ……………………………………………(2.1) (a) (b) Fig. 2.4 Simple and complex trusses From this condition, the value of X can be determined and consequently the forces in all members can be easily determined by adding the two sets of forces F0 and X F1 as follow: 0 1 F X F = − ………………………………………………(2.2) F (final) = F0 + X F1 …………………………………….(2.3) This approach is illustrated numerically in the following example. a b d c e g f a b d c e g f
  • 85. Statically determinate trusses 81 EXAMPLE 2.36 Determine the forces in all members of the shown complex truss. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions From symmetry:  Fx =0 (→+): Ya = Yc = 80/2 = 40 kN Xa = 0 If member ef is removed and member dg is added, the following simple truss is obtained Member forces (F0) This simple truss can be analyzed using the method of joints and the members forces is called F0 If the actual applied forces are removed and two equal and opposite unit forces are applied at joints e and f (the ends of the removed member) and in the direction ef. The following internal forces (F1) can be determined using the method of joints. Member forces (F1) The final forces (F) in the original truss members are calculated using the following relationship: F = F0 + X F1 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 2 m 80 kN f g a b d c e 80 kNYa =40 kN Yc=40 kN Xa=0 a b c d e f g a b c d e f g 80 kN 0 -40 0 0 89.4 89.4 0 -40 0 -80 0 40 kN 40 kN a b c d e f g 1.0 kN 0.50 0.25 -0.559 0.50 0 0 -0.559 0.25 0.559 -0.50 0.559 0 0
  • 86. 82 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. where X is a dimensionless correction factor which is the negative ratio between F0 and F1 of the added member that is given as follow: 0 1 80 160 0.5dg F X kN F   −  = − = − = −   −   The final internal forces is in the original complex truss is given as follow: Final member forces EXAMPLE 2.37 Determine the forces in all members of the shown complex truss. SOLUTION Determination of Reactions  Mb =0:  Fy =0 (+):  Fx =0 (→+): Ya  20 + 20  5 + 10  15 – 60  10 = 0 ; Ya = 17.5 kN Yb + Ya – 60 = 0 Yb = 42.5 kN – Xa + 20 +10 = 0 Xa = 30 kN The force in member ad is assumed to be P kN (Fad = P kN). Using the method of joints, the forces in the other members are determine in terms of P as follows: 80 kN -80 -80 89.4 -80 89.4 89.4 89.4 -80 -89.4 -160 -89.4 40 kN 40 kN 20.62 14.14 a b c d e f 10 m 10 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 20 kN 60 kN 10 kN 10 10 20 5 a b c d e f 20 kN 60 kN 10 kN Xa =30 kN Ya = 17.5 kN Yb = 42.5 kN
  • 87. Statically determinate trusses 83 Joint d  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy =0 (+): – 10/14.14 Fdf – 20/20.62 P = 0 Fdf = – 1.373 P kN ……………………………(a) – Fbd + 10/14.14 Fdf – 5/20.62 P = 0 Fbd = – 1.212 P kN ……………………………(b) Joint f  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy =0 (+): – 10/14.14 Fcf – 10/14.14  1.373 P + 10 = 0 Fcf = (14.14 – 1.373 P) kN …………………….(c) – Fef – 10/14.14 Fcf + 10/14.14  1.373 P – 60 = 0 Fef = (1.94 P – 70) kN …………………………(d) Joint e  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy (+): 10/14.14 Fbe – 10/14.14 Fae = 0 Fbe = Fae – 10/14.14 Fbe – 10/14.14 Fae + (1.94 P – 70) = 0 Fbe = Fae = (1.372 P – 49.49) kN ………….(e) Joint a  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy = 0 (+): 20/20.62 Fad + 10/14.14  (1.372 P – 49.49) – 30 = 0 Fad = (67 – P) kN ……………………………….(f) Fac + 5/20.62 Fad + 10/14.14  (1.372 P – 49.49) + 17.5 = 0 Fac = (1.254 – 0.728 P) kN ……………………..(g) It is noticed that member ad has two values. These values are the original estimated value (P) and the value obtained from Eq. (f) (67 – P). Since the two values must be equal, then P = 67 – P Or, P = 33.5 kN The forces in the members can be obtained by substituting P = 33.5 in Eqs. (a) to (g) as follows: From Eq.(a): From Eq.(b): From Eq.(c): From Eq.(d): From Eq.(e): Fdf = – 1.373  33.5 = – 46 kN Fbd = – 1.212  33.5 = – 40.6 kN Fcf = 14.14 – 1.373  33.5 = – 31.8 kN Fef = 1.94  33.5 – 70 = – 5 kN d Fbd P Fdf e Fae Fbe (1.94P-70) a 30 kN 17.5 kN (1.372P-49.49) Fad Fac Fef f10 kN 60 kN 1.373P Fcf
  • 88. 84 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. From Eq.(g): Fbe = Fae = 1.372  33.5 – 49.49 = – 3.5 kN Fac = 1.254 – 0.728  33.5 = – 23.1 kN The force in the remaining member can be obtained by analyzing the forces at joint c as follow:  Fx =0 (→+):  Fy (+): 20/20.62 Fbc + 20 - 10/14.14  31.8 = 0 Fbc =2.6 kN 23.1 – 5/20.62 Fbc – 10/14.14  31.8 = 0 .(Check) Final member forces 2.9 GRAPHICAL METHOD OF JOINTS (MAXWELL DIAGRAM) Any group of forces in equilibrium, when plotted to scale successively by arrowhead lines, should form a closed polygon. The external force polygon represents the reactions and external forces. Each internal force polygon represents the equilibrium of the concurrent forces at each joint. If the external forces and reactions is reading in a clockwise manner around the outside of the truss, the internal forces must also be reading in a clockwise manner around each joint. The procedure for the graphical method of joints is proposed as follows: 1. Assign a number to the space outside the truss that is separated by either a reaction or an external force, proceeding clockwise around the truss. 2. Assign a number to each triangle within the truss. 3. Begin the construction of the Maxwell diagram by starting with the external forces system, drawing a line parallel to and in the direction of a known external force and of a length to represent its magnitude to scale. Proceed around the structure clockwise; the resulting force polygon should close, as the external force system is in equilibrium. 4. Then applying superposition on the external force line polygon, such as 1-2-3-4-5 in the next example, and beginning with joint containing only two unknowns, construct line polygons for each joint in succession until all joints have been treated. At each joint proceed from force to force clockwise around the joint. 5. To interpret the results, at a given joint a member is designated by two numbers, always using the sequence obtained by moving clockwise around a joint. The “number-number” sequence is the same sequence used on the Maxwell diagram to establish the directions of the forces. The length of the line on the Maxwell diagram is proportional to the magnitude of the force. c 20 kN Fbc 23.1 31.8 a b c d e f 20 kN 60 kN 10 kN-23.1 33.5 -3.5 2.6 -40.6 -3.5 -31.8 -46 -5 30 kN 17.5 kN 42.5 kN
  • 89. Statically determinate trusses 85 EXAMPLE 2.38 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION The spaces between external forces and reactions are designated 1-2-3-4-5-1 clockwise around the truss, so the force vector 1-2-3-4-5-1 forms a closed polygon. The four internal triangles are numbered 6-7-8-9. These numbers are determined in the Maxwell diagram in succession; for instance, point 6 is the intersection of 1-6 parallel to member ac and 2-6 parallel to member ce. The magnitude of each of axial force may be measured from the force diagram and its direction acting on the joint (tension-compression) is determined by the indicated direction when proceeding from point to point on the Maxwell diagram according to the name of the member obtained by reading in a clockwise pattern around a joint of the truss diagram. For example, Fab = 7-4 on joint a = 4-7 on joint b = 20 kN (tension) Fac = 1-6 on joint a = 6-1 on joint c = 14.1 kN (compression) External forces Maxwell force diagram a b c d e f 3 m 4 m 3 m 3 m 3 m20 kN 30 kN a b c d e f 20 kN 30 kN 30 kN 12.5 kN 7.5 kN 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • 90. 86 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.39 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.19 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.40 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.21 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,10 8 9 11 a b c d e f 20 kN 30 kN 20 -14.1 -2.5 21.2 -9 -15 14.1 21.2 15 30 kN 12.5 kN 7.5 kN 20 kN 20 kN 20 kN30 kN 30 kN a b c d e f g h 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 20 kN 20 kN 20 kN 40 -50 53.3 30 -16.7 53.3 20 40 -16.7 30 -50 -40 -40 30 kN 30 kN
  • 91. Statically determinate trusses 87 External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.41 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram 50 kN 80 kN 40 kN 93.3 kN 76.7kN a b c d e f g 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 50 kN 80 kN 40 kN -93.3 132 -100 -33.9 -31.2 -76.7 -65.1 -40.9 108.4 120.9 126.4 93.3 kN 76.7 kN 7 m 7 m 7 m 7 m 7 m 2 m 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN f g ha b d c e 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN125 kN 115 kN 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a b d f h g e c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
  • 92. 88 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.42 Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.28 by the graphical method of joints SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.43 Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.18 by the graphical method of joints SOLUTION -176.8 80 kN 100 kN 60 kN 125 132.2 9.3 -11.8 132.2 100 115 82.1 -28.1 -162.6 -130 -119.6 125 kN 115 kN 80 kN 30 kN j k l f g h i a b d c e 60.8 kN 30 kN 19.2 kN 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3,5 4 6,7,8 9 10 11 12,13 14,15 -56.9 -64.1 -101.4 80 kN 30 kN 51.1 -101.4 51.1 51.1 80 25.6 -18 68.3 25.6 25.6 -31.9 -31.9 -56.9 30 kN 60.8 kN 19.2 kN 0 0 0 0 0
  • 93. Statically determinate trusses 89 External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.44 Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.14 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram 1 2 3 4,9 5 6 7 8 10 1112 60 kN 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN 80 kN 10 kN a b c d e f g 100 kN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 60 kN 40 kN 20 kN 10 kN 40 kN 80 -20 113.1 -44.7 -86.7 33.3 -10 -86.7 -16.7 80 kN 10 kN 100 kN 0 50 kN 25 kN 75 kN a b c d e f g h 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • 94. 90 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.45 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.20 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN Xa=30 kN Ya=22.5 kN Yc=22.5 kN a b c d e f g h i j k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 50 kN -12.5 28 15 -83.3 -16.7 37.3 23.6 -100 -50 70.7 -50 -100 70.7 25 kN 75 kN 1,9 2,6 3 4 5 7 8 10 12 11,13 15 14 10 kN 10 kN 10 kN 30 22.5 -18.8 18.8 -22.5 5 11.3 -15 -12.5 12.5 -11.3 3.8 -10 -6.2 6.2 -3.8 -5 30 kN 22.5 kN 22.5 kN 0 -5
  • 95. Statically determinate trusses 91 EXAMPLE 2.46 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.47 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram 5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 3 m 80 kN 100 kN 50 kN f g a b d c e 80 kN 100 kN 50 kN 50 kN 80.6 kN 99.4 kN 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a b e c d g f 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10,11 3 -397.9-380.2 -397.9-380.2 80 kN 100 kN 50 kN 394.8 358.7 137.3 -100 320 274.2 50 kN 80.6 kN 99.4 kN 0 a b c d e f g h i j 3 m 8 m 8 m 3 m 4 m 3 m 30 kN 10 kN 80 kN a b c d e f g h i j30 kN 10 kN 80 kN 73.8 kN 46.2 kN 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3,6 4 7 8 9,10 11 125,13
  • 96. 92 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.48 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.16 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.49 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 1212 -73.8 42.4 a b c d e f g h i j30 kN 10 kN 80 kN 0 -73.8 -46.2 0 -30 -30 -10 124.6 0 103.2 -10 -46.3 14.1 -86.7 -86.7 73.8 kN 46.2 kN 100 kN 100 kN 71.4 kN 100 kN 71.4 kN 100 kN a b c d e g h f i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 kN 100 kN -79.9 -64.3 -79.9 -64.3 102.7 -100 27.5 102.7 -100 27.5 -93.7 -93.7 -93.7 -93.7 71.4 kN 100 kN 71.4 kN 100 kN a b c d e f g h i 9 m 4 m 4 m 4 m20 kN 20 kN10 kN 9 m 4 m 4 m
  • 97. Statically determinate trusses 93 External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.50 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.33 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram a b c d e f g h i 20 kN 20 kN 10 kN 10 kN 13.3 kN 20 kN 26.7 kN 7 8 10 9 13 11 12 12 3 4 5 6 1,8 2 3 4 5 67 9 12 13 10,11 a b c d e f g h i 20 kN 20 kN 10 kN -16.7 0 -33.3 -20 -20.6 8.3 0 -8.3 -20.6 5 5 8.3 5 -8.3 10 kN 13.3 kN 20 kN 26.7 kN 120 kN 270 kN 390 kN a b d c e f g h 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8,9
  • 98. 94 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan. Member forces EXAMPLE 2.51 Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.29 by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION External forces Maxwell force diagram Member forces EXAMPLE 2.52 Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints. SOLUTION 120 kN -135 301.9 -225 -210 -75 30 -234.3 180 -67.1 240 -268.3 240 270 kN 390 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 100 kN100 kN a b d c e f g h k j i l m n 123456 7 8 9 10 11 13 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 19 18 17 15 12,16 14 13 -166.7 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 106.7 -33.3 133.3 60 -33.3 133.3 40 -16.7 80 100 kN 100 kN -133.3 -106.7 -133.3 -16.7 133.3 106.7 16.7 -106.7 20 16.7 60 80 133.3 40 -166.7 8 at 4 m 32 m 3 m 3 m 50 kN 50 kN50 kN50 kN 50 kN50 kN 50 kN o p f g h i a b d c e j k l m n