SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  35
KMS2014
DESIGN & MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING
          PROGRAMME


   Evaluation of Training Programmes
Objectives:
At the end of this unit, students will be able
to:
• Explain why evaluation is important.
• Identify and choose outcomes to
    evaluate a training program.
• Discuss the process used to plan and
    implement a good training evaluation.
• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
    of different evaluation designs.
• Explain the process of conducting a cost-
    benefit analysis for a training program.
Introduction
• Training effectiveness
  – the benefits that the company and the trainees
    receive from training
• Training outcomes or criteria
  – measures that the trainer and the company use to
    evaluate training programs
• Training evaluation
  – the process of collecting the outcomes needed to
    determine if training is effective
• Evaluation design
  – from whom, what, when, and how information
    needed for determining the effectiveness of the
    training program will be collected
Reasons for Evaluating
Training
• Companies are investing millions of dollars
  in training programs to help gain a
  competitive advantage
• Training investment is increasing because
  learning creates knowledge
   – This differentiates between those
     companies and employees who are
     successful and those who are not
• Because companies have made large dollar
  investments in training and education and
  view training as a strategy to be
  successful, they expect the outcomes or
  benefits related to training to be
  measurable
Training evaluation provides the
data needed to demonstrate that
training does provide benefits to
          the company.
Types of evaluation
• Formative evaluation
• Summative evaluation
Formative Evaluation
• The evaluation of training that takes place
  during program design and development

• Helps to ensure that:
  – the training program is well organized and runs
    smoothly
  – trainees learn and are satisfied with the
    program


• Provides information about how to make
  the program better
Pilot Testing
• The process of previewing the training
  program with potential trainees and
  managers or with other customers

• It can be used:
  – as a “dress rehearsal” to show the program to
    managers, trainees, and customers
  – for formative evaluation
Summative Evaluation
• Evaluation conducted to determine
  the extent to which trainees have
  changed as a result of participating in
  the training program

• May also measure the return on
  investment (ROI) that the company
  receives from the training program
Why Should A Training Program Be
Evaluated?
• To identify the program’s strengths
  and weaknesses
• To assess whether content,
  organization, and administration of
  the program contribute to learning
  and the use of training content on the
  job
• To identify which trainees benefited
  most or least from the program
Why Should A Training Program Be
Evaluated?-ctd.
• To gather data to assist in marketing
  training programs
• To determine the financial benefits
  and costs of the programs
• To compare the costs and benefits of
  training versus non-training
  investments
• To compare the costs and benefits of
  different training programs to choose
  the best program
The Evaluation Process



              Conduct a Needs Analysis


        Develop Measurable Learning Outcomes
           and Analyze Transfer of Training


             Develop Outcome Measures


            Choose an Evaluation Strategy


           Plan and Execute the Evaluation
Training Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four-
Level Framework of Evaluation Criteria


 Level Criteria     Focus
   1    Reactions   Trainee satisfaction


   2    Learning    Acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes,
                    behavior

   3    Behavior    Improvement of behavior on the job


   4    Results     Business results achieved by trainees
Outcomes Used in Evaluating
Training Programs




      Cognitive      Skill-Based
      Outcomes       Outcomes



                                    Return on
   Affective      Results          Investment
   Outcomes
• Cognitive outcomes
  – determine the degree to which trainees are
    familiar with the principles, facts, techniques,
    procedures, or processes emphasized in the
    training program
  – measure what knowledge trainees learned in the
    program
• Skill-based outcomes
  – assess the level of technical or motor skills
  – include acquisition or learning of skills and use
    of skills on the job
• Affective outcomes
  – include attitudes and motivation
  – reaction outcomes – trainees’ perceptions
    of the program including the facilities,
    trainers, and content
• Results
  – determine the training program’s payoff
    for the company
• Return on Investment (ROI)
  – comparing the training’s monetary
    benefits with the cost of the training
    • direct costs
    • indirect costs
    • benefits
Determining Whether Outcomes
Are Good



 Good training outcomes need to be:
 • Relevant
 • Reliable
 • Discriminative
 • Practical
Good Outcomes:
Relevance
• Criteria relevance – extent to which
  training programs are related to
  learned capabilities emphasized in the
  training program
• Criterion contamination – extent that
  training outcomes measure
  inappropriate capabilities or are
  affected by extraneous conditions
• Criterion deficiency – failure to measure
  training outcomes that were
  emphasized in the training objectives
Criterion deficiency, relevance,
and contamination:




                                         Outcomes
                        Outcomes       Identified by
           Outcomes                        Needs
                        Related to
          Measured in                Assessment and
                         Training
          Evaluation                    Included in
                        Objectives
                                          Training
                                        Objectives




 Contamination          Relevance               Deficiency
Good Outcomes           (continued)

• Reliability – degree to which outcomes
  can be measured consistently over time
• Discrimination – degree to which
  trainee’s performances on the outcome
  actually reflect true differences in
  performance
• Practicality – the ease with which the
  outcomes measures can be collected
Training Evaluation
Practices
Training Program Objectives and Their
Implications for Evaluation:


Objective


                       Learning                                    Transfer
Outcomes
 Reactions:     Did trainees like the program?   Skill-       Ratings by peers or managers
                Did the environment help         Based:       based on observation of behavior
                learning?
                Was material meaningful?
 Cognitive:     Pencil-and-paper tests           Affective:   Trainees’ motivation or job
                                                              attitudes
 Skill-Based:   Performance on a work sample     Results:     Did company benefit through
                                                              sales, quality, productivity,
                                                              reduced accidents, and
                                                              complaints?
                                                              Performance on work equipment
Evaluation Designs: Threats to
Validity
• Threats to validity refer to a factor that
  will lead one to question either:
  – the believability of the study results
    (internal validity), or
              validity)
  – the extent to which the evaluation
    results are generalizable to other groups
    of trainees and situations (external
    validity)
Threats to Validity


    Threats to Internal             Threats to
         Validity             External Validity
• Company                 •Reaction to pretest
• Persons                 •Reaction to
• Outcome Measures        evaluation
                          •Interaction of
                          selection and training
                          •Interaction of
                          methods
Methods to Control for Threats to
Validity



            Pre- and Posttests


            Use of Comparison
                 Groups


                Random
               Assignment
Methods to Control for Threats to
Validity-ctd.
• Pretests and Posttests – to improve the
  internal validity of the study results:
  – pretraining measure
  – posttraining measure


• Use of comparison groups
  – Hawthorne effect
Types of Evaluation
Designs

•Posttest – only      •Time Series

•Pretest / Posttest   •Solomon Four–
                      Group
•Pretest / Posttest
with Comparison
Group
Factors That Influence the Type
of Evaluation Design
Factor                 How Factor Influences Type of Evaluation Design

Change potential       Can program be modified?

Importance             Does ineffective training affect customer service, product development, or
                       relationships between employees?

Scale                  How many trainees are involved?

Purpose of training    Is training conducted for learning, results, or both?

Organization culture   Is demonstrating results part of company norms and expectations?



Expertise              Can a complex study be analyzed?

Cost                   Is evaluation too expensive?

Time frame             When do we need the information?
Importance of Training Cost
Information - ROI
• To understand total expenditures for
  training, including direct and indirect costs
• To compare costs of alternative training
  programs
• To evaluate the proportion of money spent
  on training development, administration,
  and evaluation as well as to compare
  monies spent on training for different
  groups of employees
• To control costs
To calculate return on investment
(ROI), follow these steps:
1. Identify outcome(s) (e.g., quality,
   accidents)
2. Place a value on the outcome(s)
3. Determine the change in performance
   after eliminating other potential
   influences on training results.
4. Obtain an annual amount of benefits
   (operational results) from training by
   comparing results after training to results
   before training (in dollars)
To Calculate Return on
Investment (ROI), follow these
steps: ctd.
5. Determine training costs (direct costs +
   indirect costs + development costs +
   overhead costs + compensation for
   trainees)
6. Calculate the total savings by subtracting
   the training costs from benefits
   (operational results)
7. Calculate the ROI by dividing benefits
   (operational results) by costs
     The ROI gives you an estimate of the dollar
      return expected from each dollar invested in
      training.
Determining Costs for a Cost-
Benefit Analysis:




    Direct Costs      Indirect Costs



                                   Compensation
 Development       Overhead             for
    Costs           Costs            Trainees
Measuring Human Capital and
Training Activity
• Expenditure per employee
• Learning hours received per employee
• Expenditure as a percentage of revenue
• Cost per learning hour received
• Percentage of expenditures for external services
• Learning hours received per training and
  development staff member
• Average percentage of learning activities
  outsourced
• Average percentage of learning content by
  content area (e.g. basic skills, customer service,
  executive development)
• Average percentage of learning hours provided
  via different delivery methods (instructor led,
  technology based)
What did I learn from
       here?

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Kacung Abdullah
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationdhruvt35
 
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous Process
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous ProcessTraining Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous Process
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous ProcessAshish Hande
 
Training evaluation and it's effectiveness
Training evaluation and it's effectivenessTraining evaluation and it's effectiveness
Training evaluation and it's effectivenessMalabika Beura
 
Training effectiveness
Training effectivenessTraining effectiveness
Training effectivenessPreethu K Paul
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationNancy Raj
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationMis bah
 
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROI
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROIROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROI
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROIdmdk12
 
Evaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsEvaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsSharon
 
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011BeckmanKH
 
Return on Investment On Training
Return on Investment On TrainingReturn on Investment On Training
Return on Investment On Trainingalyson.pellowe
 
Training effectiveness-ISO Prospective
Training effectiveness-ISO ProspectiveTraining effectiveness-ISO Prospective
Training effectiveness-ISO ProspectiveSAROJ BEHERA
 
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1oircjournals
 
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder TulsianiMeasuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder TulsianiRavinder Tulsiani
 
Measuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingMeasuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingZaini Ithnin
 
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kG.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kjyoti karvande
 
how to determine return on training ang development
how to determine return on training ang developmenthow to determine return on training ang development
how to determine return on training ang developmentuniversity of education
 
Training evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsTraining evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsMegha Anilkumar
 

Tendances (20)

Training Evaluation
Training EvaluationTraining Evaluation
Training Evaluation
 
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous Process
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous ProcessTraining Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous Process
Training Feedback and Evaluation, Training Audit, Training as Continuous Process
 
Training evaluation and it's effectiveness
Training evaluation and it's effectivenessTraining evaluation and it's effectiveness
Training evaluation and it's effectiveness
 
Training effectiveness
Training effectivenessTraining effectiveness
Training effectiveness
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
The Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation Model
The Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation ModelThe Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation Model
The Kirkpatrick-Phillips-Evaluation Model
 
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROI
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROIROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROI
ROI of Training - Converting Value and Calculating ROI
 
Evaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsEvaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methods
 
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
 
Return on Investment On Training
Return on Investment On TrainingReturn on Investment On Training
Return on Investment On Training
 
Training effectiveness-ISO Prospective
Training effectiveness-ISO ProspectiveTraining effectiveness-ISO Prospective
Training effectiveness-ISO Prospective
 
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
 
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder TulsianiMeasuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
 
Measuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingMeasuring roi of training
Measuring roi of training
 
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kG.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
 
how to determine return on training ang development
how to determine return on training ang developmenthow to determine return on training ang development
how to determine return on training ang development
 
Training evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsTraining evaluation models
Training evaluation models
 

En vedette (8)

Unit 3 abg izhar
Unit 3 abg izharUnit 3 abg izhar
Unit 3 abg izhar
 
Unit 6 updated
Unit 6 updatedUnit 6 updated
Unit 6 updated
 
Unit 6 updated
Unit 6 updatedUnit 6 updated
Unit 6 updated
 
Unit 7 updated
Unit 7 updatedUnit 7 updated
Unit 7 updated
 
Unit 9 notes_updated (1)
Unit 9 notes_updated (1)Unit 9 notes_updated (1)
Unit 9 notes_updated (1)
 
Unit 7 updated
Unit 7 updatedUnit 7 updated
Unit 7 updated
 
Unit 5
Unit 5Unit 5
Unit 5
 
Unit 4
Unit 4Unit 4
Unit 4
 

Similaire à Unit 8 updated

Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptx
Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptxModule 5 Training Evaluation.pptx
Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptxaradhnayadav2
 
Evaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramEvaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramSomya Tiwari
 
evaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxevaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxMahwishBukhari3
 
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationTraining &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationElsaCherian1
 
Training evaluation ppt 6
Training evaluation   ppt 6Training evaluation   ppt 6
Training evaluation ppt 6SBMC Jobs
 
A model for programmatic assessment
A model for programmatic assessmentA model for programmatic assessment
A model for programmatic assessmentGerinorth
 
Blended learning combines online and other i.docx
Blended learning combines online and other i.docxBlended learning combines online and other i.docx
Blended learning combines online and other i.docxwrite31
 
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION TruckBCH
 
Evaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingEvaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingSelf-employed
 

Similaire à Unit 8 updated (20)

Training Evaluation
Training EvaluationTraining Evaluation
Training Evaluation
 
Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptx
Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptxModule 5 Training Evaluation.pptx
Module 5 Training Evaluation.pptx
 
Trg evaluation
Trg evaluationTrg evaluation
Trg evaluation
 
training ppt - Copy
training ppt - Copytraining ppt - Copy
training ppt - Copy
 
Evaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramEvaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training Program
 
Training & development evaluation
Training & development evaluationTraining & development evaluation
Training & development evaluation
 
evaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxevaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptx
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationTraining &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
 
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdfMED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
 
Training evaluation ppt 6
Training evaluation   ppt 6Training evaluation   ppt 6
Training evaluation ppt 6
 
Training Evaluation & Management
Training Evaluation & ManagementTraining Evaluation & Management
Training Evaluation & Management
 
A model for programmatic assessment
A model for programmatic assessmentA model for programmatic assessment
A model for programmatic assessment
 
Evaluating Training Outcomes.ppt
Evaluating Training Outcomes.pptEvaluating Training Outcomes.ppt
Evaluating Training Outcomes.ppt
 
The Employment Relationship.pptx
The Employment Relationship.pptxThe Employment Relationship.pptx
The Employment Relationship.pptx
 
Blended learning combines online and other i.docx
Blended learning combines online and other i.docxBlended learning combines online and other i.docx
Blended learning combines online and other i.docx
 
training
trainingtraining
training
 
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
CHAPTER 12 DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
 
Evaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingEvaluation of training
Evaluation of training
 
Putting Program Evaluation to Work for You
Putting Program Evaluation to Work for YouPutting Program Evaluation to Work for You
Putting Program Evaluation to Work for You
 

Plus de Abidin mokhlas sdn. bhd (7)

Unit 1 abg izhar
Unit 1 abg izharUnit 1 abg izhar
Unit 1 abg izhar
 
Unit 2 abg izhar
Unit 2 abg izharUnit 2 abg izhar
Unit 2 abg izhar
 
Unit 6 updated
Unit 6 updatedUnit 6 updated
Unit 6 updated
 
Unit 5 updated
Unit 5 updatedUnit 5 updated
Unit 5 updated
 
Unit 4 notes_updated
Unit 4 notes_updatedUnit 4 notes_updated
Unit 4 notes_updated
 
Unit 3 notes_updated
Unit 3 notes_updatedUnit 3 notes_updated
Unit 3 notes_updated
 
Training
TrainingTraining
Training
 

Unit 8 updated

  • 1. KMS2014 DESIGN & MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING PROGRAMME Evaluation of Training Programmes
  • 2. Objectives: At the end of this unit, students will be able to: • Explain why evaluation is important. • Identify and choose outcomes to evaluate a training program. • Discuss the process used to plan and implement a good training evaluation. • Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different evaluation designs. • Explain the process of conducting a cost- benefit analysis for a training program.
  • 3. Introduction • Training effectiveness – the benefits that the company and the trainees receive from training • Training outcomes or criteria – measures that the trainer and the company use to evaluate training programs • Training evaluation – the process of collecting the outcomes needed to determine if training is effective • Evaluation design – from whom, what, when, and how information needed for determining the effectiveness of the training program will be collected
  • 4. Reasons for Evaluating Training • Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage • Training investment is increasing because learning creates knowledge – This differentiates between those companies and employees who are successful and those who are not • Because companies have made large dollar investments in training and education and view training as a strategy to be successful, they expect the outcomes or benefits related to training to be measurable
  • 5. Training evaluation provides the data needed to demonstrate that training does provide benefits to the company.
  • 6. Types of evaluation • Formative evaluation • Summative evaluation
  • 7. Formative Evaluation • The evaluation of training that takes place during program design and development • Helps to ensure that: – the training program is well organized and runs smoothly – trainees learn and are satisfied with the program • Provides information about how to make the program better
  • 8. Pilot Testing • The process of previewing the training program with potential trainees and managers or with other customers • It can be used: – as a “dress rehearsal” to show the program to managers, trainees, and customers – for formative evaluation
  • 9. Summative Evaluation • Evaluation conducted to determine the extent to which trainees have changed as a result of participating in the training program • May also measure the return on investment (ROI) that the company receives from the training program
  • 10. Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated? • To identify the program’s strengths and weaknesses • To assess whether content, organization, and administration of the program contribute to learning and the use of training content on the job • To identify which trainees benefited most or least from the program
  • 11. Why Should A Training Program Be Evaluated?-ctd. • To gather data to assist in marketing training programs • To determine the financial benefits and costs of the programs • To compare the costs and benefits of training versus non-training investments • To compare the costs and benefits of different training programs to choose the best program
  • 12. The Evaluation Process Conduct a Needs Analysis Develop Measurable Learning Outcomes and Analyze Transfer of Training Develop Outcome Measures Choose an Evaluation Strategy Plan and Execute the Evaluation
  • 13. Training Outcomes: Kirkpatrick’s Four- Level Framework of Evaluation Criteria Level Criteria Focus 1 Reactions Trainee satisfaction 2 Learning Acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes, behavior 3 Behavior Improvement of behavior on the job 4 Results Business results achieved by trainees
  • 14. Outcomes Used in Evaluating Training Programs Cognitive Skill-Based Outcomes Outcomes Return on Affective Results Investment Outcomes
  • 15. • Cognitive outcomes – determine the degree to which trainees are familiar with the principles, facts, techniques, procedures, or processes emphasized in the training program – measure what knowledge trainees learned in the program • Skill-based outcomes – assess the level of technical or motor skills – include acquisition or learning of skills and use of skills on the job
  • 16. • Affective outcomes – include attitudes and motivation – reaction outcomes – trainees’ perceptions of the program including the facilities, trainers, and content • Results – determine the training program’s payoff for the company
  • 17. • Return on Investment (ROI) – comparing the training’s monetary benefits with the cost of the training • direct costs • indirect costs • benefits
  • 18. Determining Whether Outcomes Are Good Good training outcomes need to be: • Relevant • Reliable • Discriminative • Practical
  • 19. Good Outcomes: Relevance • Criteria relevance – extent to which training programs are related to learned capabilities emphasized in the training program • Criterion contamination – extent that training outcomes measure inappropriate capabilities or are affected by extraneous conditions • Criterion deficiency – failure to measure training outcomes that were emphasized in the training objectives
  • 20. Criterion deficiency, relevance, and contamination: Outcomes Outcomes Identified by Outcomes Needs Related to Measured in Assessment and Training Evaluation Included in Objectives Training Objectives Contamination Relevance Deficiency
  • 21. Good Outcomes (continued) • Reliability – degree to which outcomes can be measured consistently over time • Discrimination – degree to which trainee’s performances on the outcome actually reflect true differences in performance • Practicality – the ease with which the outcomes measures can be collected
  • 23. Training Program Objectives and Their Implications for Evaluation: Objective Learning Transfer Outcomes Reactions: Did trainees like the program? Skill- Ratings by peers or managers Did the environment help Based: based on observation of behavior learning? Was material meaningful? Cognitive: Pencil-and-paper tests Affective: Trainees’ motivation or job attitudes Skill-Based: Performance on a work sample Results: Did company benefit through sales, quality, productivity, reduced accidents, and complaints? Performance on work equipment
  • 24. Evaluation Designs: Threats to Validity • Threats to validity refer to a factor that will lead one to question either: – the believability of the study results (internal validity), or validity) – the extent to which the evaluation results are generalizable to other groups of trainees and situations (external validity)
  • 25. Threats to Validity Threats to Internal Threats to Validity External Validity • Company •Reaction to pretest • Persons •Reaction to • Outcome Measures evaluation •Interaction of selection and training •Interaction of methods
  • 26. Methods to Control for Threats to Validity Pre- and Posttests Use of Comparison Groups Random Assignment
  • 27. Methods to Control for Threats to Validity-ctd. • Pretests and Posttests – to improve the internal validity of the study results: – pretraining measure – posttraining measure • Use of comparison groups – Hawthorne effect
  • 28. Types of Evaluation Designs •Posttest – only •Time Series •Pretest / Posttest •Solomon Four– Group •Pretest / Posttest with Comparison Group
  • 29. Factors That Influence the Type of Evaluation Design Factor How Factor Influences Type of Evaluation Design Change potential Can program be modified? Importance Does ineffective training affect customer service, product development, or relationships between employees? Scale How many trainees are involved? Purpose of training Is training conducted for learning, results, or both? Organization culture Is demonstrating results part of company norms and expectations? Expertise Can a complex study be analyzed? Cost Is evaluation too expensive? Time frame When do we need the information?
  • 30. Importance of Training Cost Information - ROI • To understand total expenditures for training, including direct and indirect costs • To compare costs of alternative training programs • To evaluate the proportion of money spent on training development, administration, and evaluation as well as to compare monies spent on training for different groups of employees • To control costs
  • 31. To calculate return on investment (ROI), follow these steps: 1. Identify outcome(s) (e.g., quality, accidents) 2. Place a value on the outcome(s) 3. Determine the change in performance after eliminating other potential influences on training results. 4. Obtain an annual amount of benefits (operational results) from training by comparing results after training to results before training (in dollars)
  • 32. To Calculate Return on Investment (ROI), follow these steps: ctd. 5. Determine training costs (direct costs + indirect costs + development costs + overhead costs + compensation for trainees) 6. Calculate the total savings by subtracting the training costs from benefits (operational results) 7. Calculate the ROI by dividing benefits (operational results) by costs  The ROI gives you an estimate of the dollar return expected from each dollar invested in training.
  • 33. Determining Costs for a Cost- Benefit Analysis: Direct Costs Indirect Costs Compensation Development Overhead for Costs Costs Trainees
  • 34. Measuring Human Capital and Training Activity • Expenditure per employee • Learning hours received per employee • Expenditure as a percentage of revenue • Cost per learning hour received • Percentage of expenditures for external services • Learning hours received per training and development staff member • Average percentage of learning activities outsourced • Average percentage of learning content by content area (e.g. basic skills, customer service, executive development) • Average percentage of learning hours provided via different delivery methods (instructor led, technology based)
  • 35. What did I learn from here?

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. 9
  2. 9 The following suggestions specify the types of changes in jobs that are most likely to lead to improvements in each of the five core dimensions. (1) Combine tasks - managers should put existing fractionalized tasks back together to form a new, larger module of work. This increases skill variety and task identify. (2) Create natural work units - managers should design tasks that form an identifiable and meaningful whole. This increases employee “ownership” of the work and encourages employees to view their work as meaningful and important rather than as irrelevant and boring. (3) Establish client relationships - the client is the user of the product or service that the employee works on. Whenever possible, managers should establish direct relationships between workers and their clients. This increases skill variety, autonomy, and feedback for the employee. (4) Expand jobs vertically - vertical expansion means giving employees responsibilities and controls that were formerly reserved for management. It partially closes the gap between the “doing” and “controlling” aspects of the job, and it increases employee autonomy. (5) Open feedback channels - by increasing feedback, employees not only learn how well they are performing their jobs but also whether their performances are improving, deteriorating, or remaining at a constant level. Ideally, employees should receive performance feedback directly as they do their jobs rather than from management on an occasional basis.