Dr. Normand St-Pierre of The Ohio State University presented this information as part of DAIReXNET's webinar entitled "Handling High Commodity Prices" on September 14, 2011.
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Handling High Commodity Prices- Normand St-Pierre
1. Handling High Commodity Prices
Normand St-Pierre, Ph.D., P.A.S.
The Ohio State University
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2. Realities
High(er) commodity prices are likely with us
for the long-run…
Dairy producers are NOT defenseless
Change in thinking and attitude
Sharper pencil
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
3. A Few Questions
• Is corn expensive?
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
4. Corn, U.S. No 2 Yellow
FOB Gulf of Mexico, US dollars per metric ton
July 1991 – July 2011
Source: International Monetary Fund
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
5. A Few Questions
• Is corn expensive?
• From a HISTORICAL perspective, YES.
Dah!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
6. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
7. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
Make sure that you are comparing apples to apples.
Commodities can have the same name but different specifications.
Feeds are often bought with services bundled in.
Forage analyses, ration balancing
These services have a value, but make sure that:
1. You require these services
2. They are delivered at a competitive price
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
8. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
Make use of cash discounts
Manage your cash-flow
1% discount for paying 15 days early is equal to an APR greater
than 25%.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
9. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
Make use of cash discounts
Avoid credit card balances
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
10. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
Make use of cash discounts
Avoid credit card balances
Make sure that you are getting what you paid for…
(and that you know what you are paying for…)
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
11. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Shop wiser!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
12. What Can Be Done?
Shop wiser!
Finding underpriced feeds
Not the same as “cheap feeds”
Avoiding overpriced feeds
Not the same as “expensive feeds”
Comparing feed ingredients with different
nutritional composition
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
13. It’s like buying a house!
What is this house worth?
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
14. It’s like buying a house!
Or this one?
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
15. It’s like buying a house!
Or these houses?
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
16. House Value
Different houses have different attributes.
We can price the house attributes (square feet,
number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms,
square yards of backyard, high school average
scores on SAT/ACT, etc…) if we have many
houses that sold and their attributes.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
17. The Need
To compare feedstuffs of different composition
on an economic basis.
To determine the cost of nutrients.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
18. Assumptions
Feedstuffs are worth their content of nutrients
Buyers and sellers of feedstuffs are coherent and
rational
Markets are competitive but need time (lag) to adjust.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
19. The Peterson Method
Applied to Energy and Crude Protein
Price DM % CP (%) NEl
(Mcal/lb)
Corn $ 150 88 10.0 0.89
Soybean Meal $ 300 90 55.1 0.91
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
20. The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE
Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
21. The Peterson Method:
Value of Crude Protein
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
In one Ton of Corn
Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE
Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
22. The Peterson Method:
Value of Crude Protein Value of Energy
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
In one Ton of Corn In one Ton of Corn
Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE
Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
23. The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE
Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE
Two equations with two unknowns...
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
24. The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE
Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE
$CP = $0.177/lb
$NE = $0.076/Mcal
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
25. Problems with the Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
• Assumes that corn and soybean meal (barometer feeds)
are always perfectly priced
• Both are never over- or under-priced
• Values only energy and crude protein
• Method implies irrational buyers and sellers
• Buyers would keep buying “overpriced” commodities
• Sellers would keep selling “underpriced” commodities
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
26. Overcoming the Problems
Sesame uses prices and composition of all feeds
traded in a given market to calculate the cost of
the nutrients.
Sesame uses the economically important nutrients
to assess the economic value of a feed.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
27. Reminders
There are no “requirements” in Sesame
Market information back captures the implicit state
of supply and demand
Sesame does not look whether a feed “fits”
Fitting is tactical; Sesame is strategic
Selection of different nutrients yields different
economic values
Economic value is not the same for a hog and a cow
Economic value is not the same for elite producers
vs. average producer
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
32. Soybean Meal – 48%
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
33. False Savings?
• “I grew it, so it is not as expensive
to feed my cows!”
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
34. False Savings?
• “I grew it, so it is not as expensive
to feed my cows!”
• So, the person selling your
corn is either an incompetent
or an imbecile!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
35. What is the new nutritional economics era?
• Dietary energy (NEL) costs well above historical
average (casualty of grain ethanol ???)
• Discounted RDP prices (dependent on amount of grain
processing)
• Variable d-RUP prices (should follow the “protein”
market but with greater fluctuation amplitudes)
• Discounted ne-NDF prices (depends on
supply/demand for “processed” dietary fiber)
• Expensive e-NDF (casualty of grain ethanol ???)
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
36. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
37. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseedSame amounts of forage
5.0 2.75 fed
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
38. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
15.0 11.25
Corn, ground Eliminate Wet brewers grains
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
39. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller whole cottonseed 2.75 nearly
Cut 2.25 by half
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
40. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS Reduce ground corn by 25%
- 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
41. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy Eliminate conventional2.25
- soybean meal
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
42. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy Slight increase in expeller soymeal
- 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
43. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage Heavy37.0 of by-products
use 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
- Multiple 5.0
Whole cottonseed sources reduces total
2.75
Corn, ground diet variation 11.25
15.0
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy - 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
44. 2004 2008
---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay 4.2 4.2
Legume silage 19.5 19.5
Corn silage 37.0 37.0
Brewers grains, wet 13.8 -
Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75
Corn, ground 15.0 11.25
Soymeal 44% 2.25 -
Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75
DDGS - 3.33
Hominy -
Eliminate tallow 2.25
Gluten feed - 2.75
Wheat middlings - 2.75
Tallow 0.5 -
Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
45. 2004 2008
Dry matter (lbs/day) 51.3 51.3
NEL (Mcal/lb) 0.735 0.734
---- % of DM ----
CP 17.0 16.7
RDP 11.3 10.8
RUP 5.6 5.8
MP 10.6 10.6
NDF 32.2 33.3
NFC 42.5 42.8
Ether extracts 5.7 4.6
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
46. 2004 2008
Dry matter (lbs/day) 51.3 51.3
NEL (Mcal/lb) 0.74 0.73
---- % of DM ----
CP 17.0 16.7
RDP 11.3 10.8
RUP 5.6 5.8
MP 10.6 10.6
NDF 32.2 33.3
NFC 42.5 42.8
Ether extracts 5.7 4.6
Cost ($/cow per day) 6.10 5.52
(using 2008 prices)
Difference of
$0.58/cow/day
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
47. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Shop wiser!
Avoid the black holes!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
48. What Can Be Done?
Avoid the black holes!
Shrinkage of commodities
Often exceeds 5%
DM shrinkage of silages
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
50. Pricing home-grown corn silage
10% $6.10
$67.10
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
51. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Shop wiser!
Avoid the black holes!
Don’t cut the corners!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
52. What Can Be Done?
Don’t cut the corners!
Value of multiple rations
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
53. Nutritional Grouping: Benefits
More “precise” nutrition
Diets are closer to the nutritional requirements of
all animals in the group
Reduced feed costs
Lower lead factors (safety margins)
Better targeting of feed additives and value-added
feeds
Improved production
Better control of body condition
Reduced nutrient excretion
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
54. Nutritional Grouping: Disadvantages
A pain in the b…
Transient reduction in production
Labor and management demand
More complicated to feed, etc.
A pain in the b… worth ~ $0.25/cow/day!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
55. What Can Be Done?
Don’t cut the corners!
Value of multiple rations
Avoid steep changes in diet composition
Move large number of animals at once
Reduced effects in large pens
Group for other things than breeding status
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
56. Number of Lactation Diets
Practical recommendations:
<100 cows: 1 group
100-300: 2 groups
>300: 3 groups
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
57. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Shop wiser!
Avoid the black holes!
Don’t cut the corners!
Using feed additives to hide management
flaws!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
58. What Can Be Done?
Shop better!
Shop wiser!
Avoid the black holes!
Don’t cut the corners!
Using feed additives to hide management
flaws!
Reduce the welfare checks!
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
59. The Welfare Checks
Reduce the welfare checks!
Dry cows and replacement heifers are welfare
recipients.
Their welfare checks are written by the lactating
cows.
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
60. The Welfare Checks
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
61. The Welfare Checks
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
62. The Welfare Checks
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
63. The Welfare Checks
A 30% reduction in net income…
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
64. Handling high commodity prices
What do you think?
Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University