SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  66
Handling High Commodity Prices

       Normand St-Pierre, Ph.D., P.A.S.
          The Ohio State University




               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Realities
   High(er) commodity prices are likely with us
    for the long-run…
   Dairy producers are NOT defenseless
       Change in thinking and attitude
       Sharper pencil




                       Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
A Few Questions
•   Is corn expensive?




                     Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Corn, U.S. No 2 Yellow
                      FOB Gulf of Mexico, US dollars per metric ton
                                 July 1991 – July 2011




Source: International Monetary Fund
                                  Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
A Few Questions
•   Is corn expensive?
     • From a HISTORICAL perspective, YES.



                             Dah!


                   Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!




               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
       Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
            Make sure that you are comparing apples to apples.
               Commodities can have the same name but different specifications.
            Feeds are often bought with services bundled in.
               Forage analyses, ration balancing
               These services have a value, but make sure that:
                   1. You require these services
                   2. They are delivered at a competitive price



                                    Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
       Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
       Make use of cash discounts
            Manage your cash-flow
            1% discount for paying 15 days early is equal to an APR greater
             than 25%.




                                 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
       Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
       Make use of cash discounts
       Avoid credit card balances




                            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
       Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.
       Make use of cash discounts
       Avoid credit card balances
       Make sure that you are getting what you paid for…
         (and that you know what you are paying for…)




                              Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
   Shop wiser!




               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop wiser!
       Finding underpriced feeds
            Not the same as “cheap feeds”
       Avoiding overpriced feeds
            Not the same as “expensive feeds”
       Comparing feed ingredients with different
        nutritional composition


                            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
It’s like buying a house!
   What is this house worth?




           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
It’s like buying a house!
   Or this one?




           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
It’s like buying a house!
   Or these houses?




           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
House Value
   Different houses have different attributes.
   We can price the house attributes (square feet,
    number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms,
    square yards of backyard, high school average
    scores on SAT/ACT, etc…) if we have many
    houses that sold and their attributes.



                     Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Need
   To compare feedstuffs of different composition
    on an economic basis.
   To determine the cost of nutrients.




                     Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Assumptions
   Feedstuffs are worth their content of nutrients
   Buyers and sellers of feedstuffs are coherent and
    rational
       Markets are competitive but need time (lag) to adjust.




                           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method
  Applied to Energy and Crude Protein

                  Price                       DM %                              CP (%)     NEl
                                                                                         (Mcal/lb)
Corn               $ 150                                 88                      10.0      0.89


Soybean Meal       $ 300                                 90                      55.1      0.91




                      Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal


Corn:    150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE


Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE



              Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method:
             Value of Crude Protein
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
                  In one Ton of Corn


Corn:       150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE


Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE



                  Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method:
             Value of Crude Protein                                          Value of Energy
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
                  In one Ton of Corn                                        In one Ton of Corn


Corn:       150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE


Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE



                  Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal


Corn:     150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE


Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE

Two equations with two unknowns...

              Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal

Corn:    150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE


Soybean: 300 =                    992 $CP + 1638 $NE

         $CP = $0.177/lb
         $NE = $0.076/Mcal
              Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Problems with the Peterson Method:
Using Corn and Soybean Meal
•   Assumes that corn and soybean meal (barometer feeds)
    are always perfectly priced
    •   Both are never over- or under-priced
•   Values only energy and crude protein
•   Method implies irrational buyers and sellers
    •   Buyers would keep buying “overpriced” commodities
    •   Sellers would keep selling “underpriced” commodities



                          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Overcoming the Problems
   Sesame uses prices and composition of all feeds
    traded in a given market to calculate the cost of
    the nutrients.
   Sesame uses the economically important nutrients
    to assess the economic value of a feed.




                      Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Reminders
   There are no “requirements” in Sesame
       Market information back captures the implicit state
        of supply and demand
   Sesame does not look whether a feed “fits”
       Fitting is tactical; Sesame is strategic
   Selection of different nutrients yields different
    economic values
       Economic value is not the same for a hog and a cow
       Economic value is not the same for elite producers
        vs. average producer
                          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
PA – 8/29/2011




Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
PA – 8/29/2011




Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
PA – 8/29/2011




Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
PA – 8/29/2011




Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Soybean Meal – 48%




   Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
False Savings?
•   “I grew it, so it is not as expensive
    to feed my cows!”




                       Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
False Savings?
•   “I grew it, so it is not as expensive
    to feed my cows!”
     •   So, the person selling your
         corn is either an incompetent
         or an imbecile!



                       Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What is the new nutritional economics era?
  •   Dietary energy (NEL) costs well above historical
      average (casualty of grain ethanol ???)
  •   Discounted RDP prices (dependent on amount of grain
      processing)
  •   Variable d-RUP prices (should follow the “protein”
      market but with greater fluctuation amplitudes)
  •   Discounted ne-NDF prices (depends on
      supply/demand for “processed” dietary fiber)
  •   Expensive e-NDF (casualty of grain ethanol ???)

                       Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                                             ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                                        4.2            4.2
Legume silage                                    19.5            19.5
Corn silage                                      37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet                              13.8              -
Whole cottonseed                                  5.0            2.75
Corn, ground                                     15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%                                      2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller                                2.25            2.75
DDGS                                               -             3.33
Hominy                                             -             2.25
Gluten feed                                        -             2.75
Wheat middlings                                    -             2.75
Tallow                                            0.5              -
Minerals and Vits                                 1.5            1.5


            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                    ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay               4.2            4.2
Legume silage           19.5            19.5
Corn silage             37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet     13.8              -
Whole cottonseedSame amounts of forage
                         5.0            2.75                                 fed
Corn, ground            15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%             2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller       2.25            2.75
DDGS                      -             3.33
Hominy                    -             2.25
Gluten feed               -             2.75
Wheat middlings           -             2.75
Tallow                   0.5              -
Minerals and Vits        1.5            1.5


            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                    ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay               4.2            4.2
Legume silage           19.5            19.5
Corn silage             37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet     13.8              -
Whole cottonseed         5.0            2.75
                        15.0           11.25
Corn, ground Eliminate Wet brewers grains
Soymeal 44%             2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller       2.25            2.75
DDGS                      -             3.33
Hominy                    -             2.25
Gluten feed               -             2.75
Wheat middlings           -             2.75
Tallow                   0.5              -
Minerals and Vits        1.5            1.5


          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                     ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                4.2            4.2
Legume silage            19.5            19.5
Corn silage              37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet      13.8              -
Whole cottonseed          5.0            2.75
Corn, ground             15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%              2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller whole cottonseed 2.75 nearly
            Cut          2.25             by                                half
DDGS                       -             3.33
Hominy                     -             2.25
Gluten feed                -             2.75
Wheat middlings            -             2.75
Tallow                    0.5              -
Minerals and Vits         1.5            1.5


           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                     ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                4.2            4.2
Legume silage            19.5            19.5
Corn silage              37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet      13.8              -
Whole cottonseed          5.0            2.75
Corn, ground             15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%              2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller        2.25            2.75
DDGS             Reduce ground corn by 25%
                           -             3.33
Hominy                     -             2.25
Gluten feed                -             2.75
Wheat middlings            -             2.75
Tallow                    0.5              -
Minerals and Vits         1.5            1.5


           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                    ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay               4.2            4.2
Legume silage           19.5            19.5
Corn silage             37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet     13.8              -
Whole cottonseed         5.0            2.75
Corn, ground            15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%             2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller       2.25            2.75
DDGS                      -             3.33
Hominy    Eliminate conventional2.25
                          -              soybean                            meal
Gluten feed               -             2.75
Wheat middlings           -             2.75
Tallow                   0.5              -
Minerals and Vits        1.5            1.5


           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                     ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                4.2            4.2
Legume silage            19.5            19.5
Corn silage              37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet      13.8              -
Whole cottonseed          5.0            2.75
Corn, ground             15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%              2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller        2.25            2.75
DDGS                       -             3.33
Hominy      Slight increase in expeller soymeal
                           -             2.25
Gluten feed                -             2.75
Wheat middlings            -             2.75
Tallow                    0.5              -
Minerals and Vits         1.5            1.5


          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                       ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                  4.2            4.2
Legume silage              19.5            19.5
Corn silage       Heavy37.0 of by-products
                            use            37.0
Brewers grains, wet        13.8              -
            - Multiple 5.0
Whole cottonseed            sources reduces total
                                           2.75
Corn, ground        diet variation 11.25
                           15.0
Soymeal 44%                2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller          2.25            2.75
DDGS                         -             3.33
Hominy                       -             2.25
Gluten feed                  -             2.75
Wheat middlings              -             2.75
Tallow                      0.5              -
Minerals and Vits           1.5            1.5


           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004             2008
                                             ---- lbs as fed per day ----
Legume hay                                        4.2            4.2
Legume silage                                    19.5            19.5
Corn silage                                      37.0            37.0
Brewers grains, wet                              13.8              -
Whole cottonseed                                  5.0            2.75
Corn, ground                                     15.0           11.25
Soymeal 44%                                      2.25              -
Soymeal, expeller                                2.25            2.75
DDGS                                               -             3.33
Hominy                                             -
                                             Eliminate tallow    2.25
Gluten feed                                        -             2.75
Wheat middlings                                    -             2.75
Tallow                                            0.5              -
Minerals and Vits                                 1.5            1.5


            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004               2008
Dry matter (lbs/day)                                51.3          51.3
NEL (Mcal/lb)                                      0.735         0.734
                                                     ---- % of DM ----
CP                                                  17.0          16.7
RDP                                                 11.3          10.8
RUP                                                 5.6           5.8
MP                                                  10.6          10.6
NDF                                                 32.2          33.3
NFC                                                 42.5          42.8
Ether extracts                                      5.7           4.6




            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
2004              2008
Dry matter (lbs/day)                                  51.3          51.3
NEL (Mcal/lb)                                         0.74          0.73
                                                       ---- % of DM ----
CP                                                    17.0          16.7
RDP                                                   11.3          10.8
RUP                                                   5.6           5.8
MP                                                    10.6          10.6
NDF                                                   32.2          33.3
NFC                                                   42.5          42.8
Ether extracts                                        5.7           4.6

Cost ($/cow per day)                                  6.10            5.52
(using 2008 prices)
                                                          Difference of
                                                         $0.58/cow/day

            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
   Shop wiser!
   Avoid the black holes!




               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Avoid the black holes!
       Shrinkage of commodities
            Often exceeds 5%
       DM shrinkage of silages




                           Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Pricing home-grown corn silage




          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Pricing home-grown corn silage




        10%                                                         $6.10
                                                                    $67.10

          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
   Shop wiser!
   Avoid the black holes!
   Don’t cut the corners!




               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Don’t cut the corners!
       Value of multiple rations




                        Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Nutritional Grouping: Benefits
   More “precise” nutrition
       Diets are closer to the nutritional requirements of
        all animals in the group
   Reduced feed costs
       Lower lead factors (safety margins)
       Better targeting of feed additives and value-added
        feeds
   Improved production
   Better control of body condition
   Reduced nutrient excretion
                     Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Nutritional Grouping: Disadvantages
      A pain in the b…
      Transient reduction in production
      Labor and management demand
          More complicated to feed, etc.
      A pain in the b… worth ~ $0.25/cow/day!




                      Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Don’t cut the corners!
       Value of multiple rations
            Avoid steep changes in diet composition
            Move large number of animals at once
            Reduced effects in large pens
       Group for other things than breeding status




                            Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Number of Lactation Diets
   Practical recommendations:
       <100 cows: 1 group
       100-300: 2 groups
       >300: 3 groups




                    Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
   Shop wiser!
   Avoid the black holes!
   Don’t cut the corners!
   Using feed additives to hide management
    flaws!


               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
What Can Be Done?
   Shop better!
   Shop wiser!
   Avoid the black holes!
   Don’t cut the corners!
   Using feed additives to hide management
    flaws!
   Reduce the welfare checks!

               Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Welfare Checks

   Reduce the welfare checks!
       Dry cows and replacement heifers are welfare
        recipients.
       Their welfare checks are written by the lactating
        cows.




                         Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Welfare Checks




    Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Welfare Checks




    Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Welfare Checks




    Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
The Welfare Checks




A 30% reduction in net income…




     Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Handling high commodity prices




     What do you think?




          Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Thank You
Handling High Commodity Prices- Normand St-Pierre

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Handling High Commodity Prices- Normand St-Pierre

[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
Zpryme Research & Consulting, LLC
 
Jill k feeding children in_somalia
Jill k feeding children in_somaliaJill k feeding children in_somalia
Jill k feeding children in_somalia
cwaage
 
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest CommodityGoat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
Mark Klingman
 
Goat meat america's hottest commodity
Goat meat   america's hottest commodityGoat meat   america's hottest commodity
Goat meat america's hottest commodity
Mark Klingman
 

Similaire à Handling High Commodity Prices- Normand St-Pierre (13)

Gary Kleppel, Professor and Director, Biodiversity Conservation and Policy Pr...
Gary Kleppel, Professor and Director, Biodiversity Conservation and Policy Pr...Gary Kleppel, Professor and Director, Biodiversity Conservation and Policy Pr...
Gary Kleppel, Professor and Director, Biodiversity Conservation and Policy Pr...
 
Seminar: J.V. Meenakshi on Micronutrient Malnutrition
Seminar: J.V. Meenakshi on Micronutrient MalnutritionSeminar: J.V. Meenakshi on Micronutrient Malnutrition
Seminar: J.V. Meenakshi on Micronutrient Malnutrition
 
[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
[Frozen Food Market Research] Frozen Food Insights - Zpryme Research - July 2011
 
Dr. Alfredo DiCostanzo - Fertilizer Price, Manure Value and Farm Sustainabili...
Dr. Alfredo DiCostanzo - Fertilizer Price, Manure Value and Farm Sustainabili...Dr. Alfredo DiCostanzo - Fertilizer Price, Manure Value and Farm Sustainabili...
Dr. Alfredo DiCostanzo - Fertilizer Price, Manure Value and Farm Sustainabili...
 
Marketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic GrainsMarketing Organic Grains
Marketing Organic Grains
 
School food procurement
School food procurementSchool food procurement
School food procurement
 
Jill k feeding children in_somalia
Jill k feeding children in_somaliaJill k feeding children in_somalia
Jill k feeding children in_somalia
 
Managing New Product presentation
Managing New Product presentationManaging New Product presentation
Managing New Product presentation
 
Dave Stender - Find the Edge for Successful Niche Production
Dave Stender - Find the Edge for Successful Niche ProductionDave Stender - Find the Edge for Successful Niche Production
Dave Stender - Find the Edge for Successful Niche Production
 
Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet
Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference dietAffordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet
Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet
 
Small Ruminant Nutrition
Small Ruminant NutritionSmall Ruminant Nutrition
Small Ruminant Nutrition
 
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest CommodityGoat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
Goat Meat: America’s Hottest Commodity
 
Goat meat america's hottest commodity
Goat meat   america's hottest commodityGoat meat   america's hottest commodity
Goat meat america's hottest commodity
 

Plus de DAIReXNET

Plus de DAIReXNET (20)

Uterine Health and Potential Connection with Genetic Variation
Uterine Health and Potential Connection with Genetic VariationUterine Health and Potential Connection with Genetic Variation
Uterine Health and Potential Connection with Genetic Variation
 
Finding More Value With Genomic Testing
Finding More Value With Genomic TestingFinding More Value With Genomic Testing
Finding More Value With Genomic Testing
 
Foot Rot and Digital Dermatitis
Foot Rot and Digital DermatitisFoot Rot and Digital Dermatitis
Foot Rot and Digital Dermatitis
 
How Dairy Cattle Facilities May Contribute to Lameness
How Dairy Cattle Facilities May Contribute to LamenessHow Dairy Cattle Facilities May Contribute to Lameness
How Dairy Cattle Facilities May Contribute to Lameness
 
Preventing Lameness In Dairy Cattle
Preventing Lameness In Dairy CattlePreventing Lameness In Dairy Cattle
Preventing Lameness In Dairy Cattle
 
Nutritional Causes of Lameness
Nutritional Causes of LamenessNutritional Causes of Lameness
Nutritional Causes of Lameness
 
Recognizing Lame Cows Early
Recognizing Lame Cows EarlyRecognizing Lame Cows Early
Recognizing Lame Cows Early
 
Implementing and Evaluating a Selective Dry Cow Therapy Program
Implementing and Evaluating a Selective Dry Cow Therapy ProgramImplementing and Evaluating a Selective Dry Cow Therapy Program
Implementing and Evaluating a Selective Dry Cow Therapy Program
 
New Insights Into the People Side of Milk Quality
New Insights Into the People Side of Milk QualityNew Insights Into the People Side of Milk Quality
New Insights Into the People Side of Milk Quality
 
Economic Considerations Regarding the Raising of Dairy Replacement Heifers
Economic Considerations Regarding the Raising of Dairy Replacement HeifersEconomic Considerations Regarding the Raising of Dairy Replacement Heifers
Economic Considerations Regarding the Raising of Dairy Replacement Heifers
 
Feeding Dry Dairy Cows Lower Energy Diets
Feeding Dry Dairy Cows Lower Energy DietsFeeding Dry Dairy Cows Lower Energy Diets
Feeding Dry Dairy Cows Lower Energy Diets
 
An Overview of Work Safey and Health Issues on Dairy Farms
An Overview of Work Safey and Health Issues on Dairy FarmsAn Overview of Work Safey and Health Issues on Dairy Farms
An Overview of Work Safey and Health Issues on Dairy Farms
 
Optimizing Production by Managing How Dairy Cows Eat
Optimizing Production by Managing How Dairy Cows EatOptimizing Production by Managing How Dairy Cows Eat
Optimizing Production by Managing How Dairy Cows Eat
 
Diagnosis and Treatment of Metritis
Diagnosis and Treatment of MetritisDiagnosis and Treatment of Metritis
Diagnosis and Treatment of Metritis
 
Defining a Compensation Structure for the Dairy Workforce
Defining a Compensation Structure for the Dairy WorkforceDefining a Compensation Structure for the Dairy Workforce
Defining a Compensation Structure for the Dairy Workforce
 
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Joe Dalton
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Joe DaltonCurrent Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Joe Dalton
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Joe Dalton
 
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Jose Santos
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Jose SantosCurrent Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Jose Santos
Current Research in Genomic Selection- Dr. Jose Santos
 
An Overview of Genomic Selection and Fertility
An Overview of Genomic Selection and FertilityAn Overview of Genomic Selection and Fertility
An Overview of Genomic Selection and Fertility
 
Managing Mastitis in Bred Heifers
Managing Mastitis in Bred HeifersManaging Mastitis in Bred Heifers
Managing Mastitis in Bred Heifers
 
Avoiding Disease in Dairy Calves
Avoiding Disease in Dairy CalvesAvoiding Disease in Dairy Calves
Avoiding Disease in Dairy Calves
 

Dernier

Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 

Dernier (20)

SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 

Handling High Commodity Prices- Normand St-Pierre

  • 1. Handling High Commodity Prices Normand St-Pierre, Ph.D., P.A.S. The Ohio State University Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 2. Realities  High(er) commodity prices are likely with us for the long-run…  Dairy producers are NOT defenseless  Change in thinking and attitude  Sharper pencil Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 3. A Few Questions • Is corn expensive? Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 4. Corn, U.S. No 2 Yellow FOB Gulf of Mexico, US dollars per metric ton July 1991 – July 2011 Source: International Monetary Fund Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 5. A Few Questions • Is corn expensive? • From a HISTORICAL perspective, YES. Dah! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 6. What Can Be Done?  Shop better! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 7. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.  Make sure that you are comparing apples to apples.  Commodities can have the same name but different specifications.  Feeds are often bought with services bundled in.  Forage analyses, ration balancing  These services have a value, but make sure that:  1. You require these services  2. They are delivered at a competitive price Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 8. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.  Make use of cash discounts  Manage your cash-flow  1% discount for paying 15 days early is equal to an APR greater than 25%. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 9. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.  Make use of cash discounts  Avoid credit card balances Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 10. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Finding the same feed, but cheaper somewhere else.  Make use of cash discounts  Avoid credit card balances  Make sure that you are getting what you paid for… (and that you know what you are paying for…) Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 11. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Shop wiser! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 12. What Can Be Done?  Shop wiser!  Finding underpriced feeds  Not the same as “cheap feeds”  Avoiding overpriced feeds  Not the same as “expensive feeds”  Comparing feed ingredients with different nutritional composition Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 13. It’s like buying a house!  What is this house worth? Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 14. It’s like buying a house!  Or this one? Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 15. It’s like buying a house!  Or these houses? Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 16. House Value  Different houses have different attributes.  We can price the house attributes (square feet, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms, square yards of backyard, high school average scores on SAT/ACT, etc…) if we have many houses that sold and their attributes. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 17. The Need  To compare feedstuffs of different composition on an economic basis.  To determine the cost of nutrients. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 18. Assumptions  Feedstuffs are worth their content of nutrients  Buyers and sellers of feedstuffs are coherent and rational  Markets are competitive but need time (lag) to adjust. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 19. The Peterson Method Applied to Energy and Crude Protein Price DM % CP (%) NEl (Mcal/lb) Corn $ 150 88 10.0 0.89 Soybean Meal $ 300 90 55.1 0.91 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 20. The Peterson Method: Using Corn and Soybean Meal Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 21. The Peterson Method: Value of Crude Protein Using Corn and Soybean Meal In one Ton of Corn Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 22. The Peterson Method: Value of Crude Protein Value of Energy Using Corn and Soybean Meal In one Ton of Corn In one Ton of Corn Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 23. The Peterson Method: Using Corn and Soybean Meal Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE Two equations with two unknowns... Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 24. The Peterson Method: Using Corn and Soybean Meal Corn: 150 = 176 $CP + 1566 $NE Soybean: 300 = 992 $CP + 1638 $NE $CP = $0.177/lb $NE = $0.076/Mcal Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 25. Problems with the Peterson Method: Using Corn and Soybean Meal • Assumes that corn and soybean meal (barometer feeds) are always perfectly priced • Both are never over- or under-priced • Values only energy and crude protein • Method implies irrational buyers and sellers • Buyers would keep buying “overpriced” commodities • Sellers would keep selling “underpriced” commodities Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 26. Overcoming the Problems  Sesame uses prices and composition of all feeds traded in a given market to calculate the cost of the nutrients.  Sesame uses the economically important nutrients to assess the economic value of a feed. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 27. Reminders  There are no “requirements” in Sesame  Market information back captures the implicit state of supply and demand  Sesame does not look whether a feed “fits”  Fitting is tactical; Sesame is strategic  Selection of different nutrients yields different economic values  Economic value is not the same for a hog and a cow  Economic value is not the same for elite producers vs. average producer Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 28. PA – 8/29/2011 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 29. PA – 8/29/2011 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 30. PA – 8/29/2011 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 31. PA – 8/29/2011 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 32. Soybean Meal – 48% Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 33. False Savings? • “I grew it, so it is not as expensive to feed my cows!” Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 34. False Savings? • “I grew it, so it is not as expensive to feed my cows!” • So, the person selling your corn is either an incompetent or an imbecile! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 35. What is the new nutritional economics era? • Dietary energy (NEL) costs well above historical average (casualty of grain ethanol ???) • Discounted RDP prices (dependent on amount of grain processing) • Variable d-RUP prices (should follow the “protein” market but with greater fluctuation amplitudes) • Discounted ne-NDF prices (depends on supply/demand for “processed” dietary fiber) • Expensive e-NDF (casualty of grain ethanol ???) Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 36. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 37. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseedSame amounts of forage 5.0 2.75 fed Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 38. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 15.0 11.25 Corn, ground Eliminate Wet brewers grains Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 39. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller whole cottonseed 2.75 nearly Cut 2.25 by half DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 40. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS Reduce ground corn by 25% - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 41. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy Eliminate conventional2.25 - soybean meal Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 42. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy Slight increase in expeller soymeal - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 43. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage Heavy37.0 of by-products use 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - - Multiple 5.0 Whole cottonseed sources reduces total 2.75 Corn, ground diet variation 11.25 15.0 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 44. 2004 2008 ---- lbs as fed per day ---- Legume hay 4.2 4.2 Legume silage 19.5 19.5 Corn silage 37.0 37.0 Brewers grains, wet 13.8 - Whole cottonseed 5.0 2.75 Corn, ground 15.0 11.25 Soymeal 44% 2.25 - Soymeal, expeller 2.25 2.75 DDGS - 3.33 Hominy - Eliminate tallow 2.25 Gluten feed - 2.75 Wheat middlings - 2.75 Tallow 0.5 - Minerals and Vits 1.5 1.5 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 45. 2004 2008 Dry matter (lbs/day) 51.3 51.3 NEL (Mcal/lb) 0.735 0.734 ---- % of DM ---- CP 17.0 16.7 RDP 11.3 10.8 RUP 5.6 5.8 MP 10.6 10.6 NDF 32.2 33.3 NFC 42.5 42.8 Ether extracts 5.7 4.6 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 46. 2004 2008 Dry matter (lbs/day) 51.3 51.3 NEL (Mcal/lb) 0.74 0.73 ---- % of DM ---- CP 17.0 16.7 RDP 11.3 10.8 RUP 5.6 5.8 MP 10.6 10.6 NDF 32.2 33.3 NFC 42.5 42.8 Ether extracts 5.7 4.6 Cost ($/cow per day) 6.10 5.52 (using 2008 prices) Difference of $0.58/cow/day Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 47. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Shop wiser!  Avoid the black holes! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 48. What Can Be Done?  Avoid the black holes!  Shrinkage of commodities  Often exceeds 5%  DM shrinkage of silages Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 49. Pricing home-grown corn silage Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 50. Pricing home-grown corn silage 10% $6.10 $67.10 Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 51. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Shop wiser!  Avoid the black holes!  Don’t cut the corners! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 52. What Can Be Done?  Don’t cut the corners!  Value of multiple rations Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 53. Nutritional Grouping: Benefits  More “precise” nutrition  Diets are closer to the nutritional requirements of all animals in the group  Reduced feed costs  Lower lead factors (safety margins)  Better targeting of feed additives and value-added feeds  Improved production  Better control of body condition  Reduced nutrient excretion Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 54. Nutritional Grouping: Disadvantages  A pain in the b…  Transient reduction in production  Labor and management demand  More complicated to feed, etc.  A pain in the b… worth ~ $0.25/cow/day! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 55. What Can Be Done?  Don’t cut the corners!  Value of multiple rations  Avoid steep changes in diet composition  Move large number of animals at once  Reduced effects in large pens  Group for other things than breeding status Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 56. Number of Lactation Diets  Practical recommendations:  <100 cows: 1 group  100-300: 2 groups  >300: 3 groups Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 57. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Shop wiser!  Avoid the black holes!  Don’t cut the corners!  Using feed additives to hide management flaws! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 58. What Can Be Done?  Shop better!  Shop wiser!  Avoid the black holes!  Don’t cut the corners!  Using feed additives to hide management flaws!  Reduce the welfare checks! Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 59. The Welfare Checks  Reduce the welfare checks!  Dry cows and replacement heifers are welfare recipients.  Their welfare checks are written by the lactating cows. Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 60. The Welfare Checks Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 61. The Welfare Checks Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 62. The Welfare Checks Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 63. The Welfare Checks A 30% reduction in net income… Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
  • 64. Handling high commodity prices What do you think? Copyright 2011, N. St-Pierre, The Ohio State University