2. 198 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 13, 2014
Fig. 1. (a) Geometrical configuration of the proposed antenna. (b) Aperture
antenna layer. (c) Side view of the proposed antenna.
Fig. 2. Comparison of octagonal-shaped aperture and circular-shaped aperture.
in high frequency band. However, this phenomenon becomes
more obvious as the low-profile backed cavity and parasitic
patch are added. The octagonal-shaped cavity-backed aperture
antenna can achieve an AR bandwidth of 38%, while the cir-cular-
shaped cavity-backed aperture antenna can achieve an AR
bandwidth of 42%. Moreover, the return loss of the circular-shaped
cavity-backed aperture antenna seemsmuch better in the
higher frequency band. Hence, the circular-shaped aperture an-tenna
is adopted to obtain optimal performance.
The working principle of the circular-shaped aperture an-tenna
is studied first. As depicted in Fig. 3, the lower resonant
frequency is corresponding to the TE mode of the circular
slot, while the higher resonant frequency is caused by the TE
mode. However, the current distributions of the two resonant
modes indicate that the corresponding relations are just approx-imate
equivalent since they are not strictly symmetric along the
circular slot. From the above discussion, it can be concluded
Fig. 3. Current distributions at different times of
from left to right. (a) 5 GHz. (b) 6.7 GHz.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the proposed antenna in different cases.
that the resonant frequencies of the circular-shaped aperture are
mainly decided by the dimensions of and . The authors
would like to use
(1)
(where is the speed of light in free space) to calculate the res-onant
frequency of TE ; the second term in the equation is the
correction factor considering the presence of different dielectric
media on the two sides of the aperture antenna [11]. The center
frequency can be estimated once is obtained.
The effects of the low-profile backed cavity ( at
6 GHz) and parasitic patch are also studied as shown in Fig. 4.
It is seen that the AR bandwidth of the aperture antenna without
a backed cavity and parasitic patch is the widest, while the gain
is quite low due to its bidirectional radiation properties. How-ever,
the gain of the cavity-backed aperture antenna without
parasitic patch is about 1 dB less than the proposed antenna in
the whole band since the AR performance is deteriorated by
the low-profile backed cavity (more than 5 dB). In other words,
the parasitic patch can be used to complement the deteriorated
CP performance of the aperture antenna with a low-profile
backed cavity. According to [12], the parasitic patch should be
designed to resonant at the highest frequency in the AR band of
the aperture antenna to obtain the widest AR bandwidth since
the amplitudes difference of the patch’s two eigen-resonant
3. YANG AND ZHOU: WIDEBAND CP CAVITY-BACKED APERTURE ANTENNA WITH PARASITIC SQUARE PATCH 199
Fig. 5. Effects of varying on the return loss and axial ratio.
Fig. 6. Effects of varying on the return loss and axial ratio.
Fig. 7. Effects of varying and on the return loss and axial ratio.
currents becomes larger quickly in the band that is higher than
its resonant frequency.
To evaluate the effects of the antenna dimensions on the re-turn
loss and AR, a parametric study is performed. The simu-lated
return loss and AR of the proposed antenna by varying
are shown in Fig. 5. It is seen that the higher resonant fre-quency
is mainly determined by the parasitic patch, and the CP
performance in the AR band is affected by the coupling be-tween
the cavity-backed aperture antenna and parasitic patch.
The optimized return-loss and AR bandwidths can be achieved
when mm ( at 6 GHz), which is similar as de-scribed
in [8]. Fig. 6 shows the simulated return loss and AR
with different values of , where we can observe that the peak
Fig. 8. Photograph of the fabricated antenna.
Fig. 9. Simulated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna.
appearing in AR curve moves to the lower frequency as in-creases.
This is the effect due to the internal resonance of the slot
antenna loaded cavity. Therefore, the width of the cavity should
be adjusted to keep away from the internal resonance for an op-timal
performance The variations of return loss andARwith the
depth of the cavity and width of the parasitic patch are
depicted in Fig. 7. It can be seen that good CP performance in the
central zone of theAR band can be stillmaintained as long as the
parasitic patch grows properlywith decreasing. The achieved
AR bandwidth is about 42% for mm % for
mm % for mm , and 16%
for mm . However, the return loss of the an-tenna
changes slightly as the parameters mentioned above are
not dramatically varied.
From the discussion above, it can be learned that a favorable
CP performance can be achieved by suspending a patch above
the low-profile cavity-backed aperture antenna that has a dete-riorative
CP characteristic in itself as known in [4] and [5].
III. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION
In order to validate the simulated performance of the pro-posed
antenna, prototypes of the antenna are fabricated by using
printed circuit board (PCB) process as shown in Fig. 8. Detailed
geometrical parameters of the proposed antenna are listed as fol-lows
(all in millimeters):
.
The simulated and measured of the proposed antenna
are plotted in Fig. 9. It can be found that the return loss is below
10 dB from 4.73 to more than 9 GHz. The overall tendencies
4. 200 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 13, 2014
Fig. 10. Simulated and measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna.
(a) -plane at 5 GHz. (b) -plane at 5 GHz. (c) -plane at 7 GHz.
(d) -plane at 7 GHz.
Fig. 11. Simulated and measured axial ratio and gain of the proposed antenna.
TABLE I
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON AT 6 GHZ
of the simulation and measurement agree well with each other.
Fig. 10 depicts the simulated and measured radiation patterns
in the - and -plane, respectively, for 5 and 7 GHz. The CP
performance was measured using a rotating linearly polarized
transmitting horn antenna. The ripples in the pattern represent
the quality of the CP radiation. As illustrated in Fig. 11, the
measured 3-dB AR bandwidth is around 43.3% (4.8–7.4 GHz),
which is completely within the 2-VSWR impedance bandwidth.
The measured peak gain is 8.6 dBi at 7.4 GHz, while a gain of
more than 6 dBi in the whole AR bandwidth is achieved.
The comparison between the measured performances of
the proposed antenna and antennas reported in [6] and [7] is
listed in Table I. Compared to the antenna presented in [6],
the proposed antenna shows larger impedance and 3-dB AR
bandwidths while having slightly larger volume. On the con-trary,
the proposed antenna has smaller AR bandwidth than the
antenna presented in [8] while having much smaller volume.
Furthermore, the proposed antenna is much easier for design,
fabrication, and integration than both mentioned above.
IV. CONCLUSION
In this letter, a technique to design a wideband circularly po-larized
cavity-backed aperture antenna is presented.Aprototype
operating at 6 GHz has been designed and measured to validate
the concept. The prototype achieves an impedance bandwidth
of more than 70%, an AR bandwidth of 43.3%, and a peak gain
of 8.6 dBi. The proposed antenna exhibits promising character-istics
of wide impedance and AR band, high aperture efficiency
(more than 65% except 7–7.4 GHz), and easiness of design, fab-rication,
and integration.
REFERENCES
[1] Nasimuddin, X. Qing, and Z. N. Chen, “Symmetric-aperture antenna
for broadband circular polarization,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag,
vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3932–3936, Oct. 2011.
[2] J. Y. Jan, C. Y. Pan, K. Y. Chiu, andH.M. Chen, “BroadbandCPW-fed
circularly-polarized slot antenna with an open slot,” IEEE Trans. An-tennas
Propag., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1418–1422, Mar. 2013.
[3] K. L. Lau, H. Wong, and K. M. Luk, “A full-wavelength circularly
polarized slot antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2,
pp. 741–743, Feb. 2006.
[4] C. J. Wang and C. H. Chen, “CPW-fed stair-shaped slot antennas with
circular polarization,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 8,
pp. 2483–2486, Aug. 2009.
[5] Y. Lu, M. Yu, and Y. Lin, “A single-fed slot-aperture hybrid antenna
for broadband circular polarization operations,” Microw. Opt. Technol.
Lett., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 412–415, Feb. 2012.
[6] K. Agarwal, Nasimuddin, and A. Alphones, “Wideband circularly po-larizedAMC
reflector backed aperture antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1456–1461, Mar. 2013.
[7] Y. J. Hu, W. P. Ding, W. M. Ni, and W. Q. Cao, “Broadband circularly
polarized cavity-backed slot antenna array with four linearly polarized
disks located in a single circular slot,” IEEE AntennasWireless Propag.
Lett., vol. 11, pp. 496–499, 2012.
[8] T. N. Chang and J. M. Lin, “Circularly polarized ring-patch antenna,”
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 26–29, 2012.
[9] X. Chen, G. Fu, S. X. Gong, Y. L. Yan, and W. Zhao, “Circularly po-larized
stacked annular-ring microstrip antenna with integrated feeding
network for UHF RFID readers,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
Lett., vol. 9, pp. 542–545, 2010.
[10] T. N. Chang, J. M. Lin, andY.G. Chen, “A circularly polarized ring-an-tenna
fed by a serially coupled square slot-ring,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1132–1135, Feb. 2012.
[11] J. S. Rao and B. N. Das, “Impedance characteristics of transverse slots
in the ground plane of a stripline,” Inst. Elec. Eng. Proc., vol. 125, pp.
29–32, 1978.
[12] T. Noro, Y. Kazama,M. Takahashi, and K. Ito, “A study on the mech-anism
of wideband characteristics for single-fed stacked circularly po-larization
patch antenna,” in IEEE Antennas Propag. Soc. Int. Symp.
Dig., Honolulu, HI, USA, Jun. 2007, pp. 733–736.