2. Inputs
Source (who?)
Message (says what?)
Channel (via which media?)
Audience (to whom?)
Destination (regarding what?)
Greatest level of control by campaign planners
3. Source
Three characteristic of source:
Credibility – source’s perceived expertise and trustworthiness
Issue-advocacy ads (who speaks for who’s benefits?)
Attractiveness – source’s pleasantness, beauty, familiarity,
similarity
Power – compliance
Cognitive process and persuasive impact
Theory of Source Monitoring (Negiyan & Grabe, 2007)
Memory & schematic (prior) knowledge
Content and source identification perceptions
Format and time affects
4. The structure of argument
Audience belief system
Media genres – format characteristics, message structure
(folk-story structure?) music, sound
Types of argument
Use of logic or rhetoric
Arrangement of argument
Types of appeals (Reeves, et al., 1991)
Logical (use language of evidence and facts)
Emotional (language, imagery)
Message variables
5. Message variables, cont.
Message-style variables
Using factual examples vs. abstract principles
Literal vs. figurative language
Toulmin’s Structural Model of Argument
Claims (positive or negative) using fact, value, or policy
Warrants (implicit or explicit)
Data (first, second, and third order)
Effects based on length and frequency
Time of spot; size and detail of print ad; amount of information
Frequency (repetitive ads)
6. Image vs. Issue
Content and effect (Johnston & Kaid, 2002)
Political Ads How can voters make rational decisions?
Image construction as manipulation
Campaigns ethics will this influence audience’s decision?
Issue content
Image content
More issues in political ads than TV news
Issue of dramatization
Hard vs. soft sell
Can you dichotomize these two?
7. Channel variables
Media use
Which audiences? Which media? Which content? Which time?
Evidence
Evidence for intended television effects on purchasing behavior
Evidence for unintended television effects within programs
Arguments and excuses for lack of evidence effects
We can control the input, but not the outcome
8. Audience variables
A Mediational Theory of Susceptibility to
social influence
Personality
Abilities
Motivations
Special target groups (Pfau et al., 2002)
Political party affiliation
9. Destination: campaign intention
Beliefs, attitudes, and behavior
Favorability to the topic increase positive attitudes/feelings
and behavior
Change in one of the three tends to affect others
Persistence of persuasive impact
Decay in attitudes varies greatly depending on source
credibility, subtlety of argument, order of presentation, channel
Inducing resistance to persuasion
Many approaches, e.g., prior commitment, pre-anger/increased
self-esteem, anchoring initial stand, educate about critical
thinking, resistant models, and inoculation
10. Output: How persuasion works?
Mediators of persuasive impact
Multiple paths, e.g., peripheral with source credibility or central with situation
Sequences of the mediating processes
Communicating recall and liking
Decision process evoked by persuasive communication
Cognitive calculation of costs and benefits
Cognitive shortcuts to “bringing to mind”
Remote ramifications and generalization carry-over
Subjective norms and valued “others” beliefs/feelings
11. Symbolism and Language
Cicero’s five canons of rhetoric
Invention
Arrangement
Style (expression)
Memory
Delivery
Know the audience how they decode message
12. Symbolism and Language, cont.
Cultural competency
Certain symbols or language is specific to certain culture
Violation of normative expectations
Verbal intensity (metaphors)
Verbal immediacy (direct/immediate speech)