Maria Garrido: "Past and present of Telecentres - their demonstrated value"
1. Past and Present of Telecentres
Their demonstrated value
Telecentre-Europe Summit
Warsaw, 2012
Maria Garrido and Araba Sey
European Commission
Joint Research Centre
Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
• Build a landscape of theories that explain how, why,
and under which conditions e-Inclusion actors
contribute to advance social and economic goals.
• Analyze the value of these theories and analytical
frameworks and the evidence of impact.
• Develop recommendations on the most promising
theoretical pillars that could inform MIREIA project.
3. HOW WAS THE STUDY CONDUCTED
LANDSCAPE OF THE LITERATURE IN LAST 10 YEARS
• English academic and grey literature sources
• Over 400 articles, books, and reports reviewed
• Identified the most dominant explanations and
those with potential to explain how the work of e-
Inclusion actors produces impact or not
• 200+ sources selected for in-depth coding
4. SOME CONSIDERATIONS
• Different perceptions of what constitutes
impact
• Difficulty in isolating the effects of ICT-related
to other activities provided by intermediaries
• Importance of contextual factors in explaining
impact
5. DEFINING CATEGORIES OF IMPACT
1. Skilling: improvement of ICT skills and capabilities,
leading to better opportunities in labor market
2. Empowerment: enhancement of confidence and
motivation for learning and aspiration to improve
3. Networking: strengthening network ties and
outreach potential increasing opportunities for
socio-economic participation.
4. Job-placement capabilities: facilitate information
access on job opportunities to actively participate in
local economic development
7. EVIDENCE ON SKILLING
• ICT skills training allows lower skilled workers to
develop technical skills increasing competitiveness in
labor market
• Combined with other employment-related services
(job interview skills, connection to employers,
internships, etc.)
• ICT skills training function as a catalyst to develop
other critical skills that are highly valued in the labor
market.
• Basic ICT skills training often functions as a lure for
participants to engage in either additional ICT skills
courses or in other types of training.
9. EVIDENCE ON EMPOWERMENT
• Motivation for participating in ICT skills training,
participants often cite aspirations related to
employment as major benefits.
• Participants feel that ICT training can expand their
employment horizons into areas previously
considered out of reach.
• Shared perception that ICT skills are very important
to get better jobs, improve income, and learn more
advanced technology skills or other kinds of skills.
• Training provided not only builds human capital but
enhances the “capacity of aspire” expanding
professional horizons, self-esteem, and autonomy.
11. EVIDENCE ON NETWORKING
• E-Inclusion intermediaries are often the most
valuable channel for finding employment after family
and friends.
• Important bridges for expanding and diversifying
social relations and job channels
• Means to connect to the outside world through
technology and social networks and actively support
community development
12. FOOD FOR THOUGHT
• How do we define impact? For whom and for what?
• What levels and combination of services e-Inclusion
actors are needed to contribute to impact?
• Evidence on impact is fragmented so what do we do as
advocates, researchers, and program implementers?
• How do we reach some level of systematization of future
evidence? Pros and Cons
• How do we draw a map of this all inclusive category of
eInclusion intermediaries?
13. Thank You!
Maria Garrido, Research Assistant Professor Araba Sey, Research Assistant Professor
Information School Information School
migarrid@uw.edu arabasey@uw.edu
Twitter: @mariaigarrido
Luis Santana, PhD Student
Tabitha Hart, PhD Student
Communications Department
Communications Department
Technology & Social Change Group
University of Washington Information School
tascha.uw.edu
+1.206.616.9101
Notes de l'éditeur
The literature highlights more the potential than the actual
The literature highlights more the potential than the actualConnecting impacts to work of e-Inclusion actors can be done by mapping:Institutional and service factors to different types of impactsOcurrence or not occurrence of impacts need to be contextualized
The literature highlights more the potential than the actual
The literature highlights more the potential than the actual
The literature highlights more the potential than the actual
The literature highlights more the potential than the actual