KOTLA MUBARAKPUR
SUBMITTED BY:
ACHINT MIGLANI
ANUBHAV KAPOOR
CHAYAN KHURANA
MANNAT GUPTA
SAMARITI DAHIYA

INTRODUCTION
URBAN VILLAGE
CO CCO
VILLAGES OF DELHI
CO C
ACCORDING TO CENSUS DATA FROM 2001, DELHI’S URBANIZATION LEVEL WAS 93.01
PER CENT, AND NUMEROUS STUDIES AND GOVERNMENTS DOCUMENTS REVEAL THAT
MORE THAN HALF OF THESE RESIDENTS LIVE IN UNPLANNED SETTLEMENTS.
 “URBAN VILLAGE TYPICALLY WOULD MEAN A WELL-PLANNED SET-UP WITH A
VILLAGE-CONCEPT OF BEING FAIRLY SELF-SUFFICIENT AND NOT HAVING THE NEED
TO TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES TO GET DAILY THINGS DONE. WHAT IS MOST
IMPORTANT, PERHAPS, IS THAT IT’S INTENDED TO TACKLE THE PROBLEM OF
INCREASING POPULATION IN CITIES.”
 RURAL VILLAGES: 227
 RURAL POPULATION: 6.82% IN 37.64% OF LAND
 URBANIZED VILLAGES: 135
 URBAN POPULATION: 8.47 MILLION IN 1991 TO 16.75 MILLION IN 2011 (MORE
THAN 55% GROWTH) PUTTING PRESSURE AND INCREASING RISKS.
 GOVERNMENT IN THE PROCESS TO URBANIZE THE RURAL VILLAGES TO REDUCE
MIGRATION AND PRESSURE THUS INSTIGATING SPRAWL.
 UNPLANNED AND HAPHAZARD URBAN GROWTH.
CO C
INTRODUCTION
 KOTLA MUBARAKPUR WAS A MEDIEVAL VILLAGE SETTLED IN THE 15TH CENTURY IN THE PRESENT
SOUTH DELHI.
 IT IS A HISTORICAL COMPLEX WITH TOMBS OF RULERS AND GOVERNORS FROM SAYYID AND LOD
HI DYNASTY.
 TODAY IT IS A BUSTLING MARKETPLACE AND A DENSELY POPULATED URBAN VILLAGE.
CO CCO C
COMMUNITY KUSUMPUR PAHARI
LOCATION KOTLA MUBARAKPUR: MEDIEVAL VILLAGE IN ZONE D. CLASSIFIED
BY DDA AS URBAN VILLAGE IN 1971.
ORIGIN SPORADIC LAND ENCROACHMENT
AREA 96 ACRES
POPULATION 27,000 (2011)
DENSITY 710 PPH
KEY SOURCES OF EMPLYOMENT DOMESTIC WORK IN DEFENSE COLONY AND SOUTH EXTENSION.
SMALL-SCALE ENTERPRISE. PAID WORK OUTSIDE COMMUNITY.
LOCALITIES KOTLA, PILANJI, KHAIRPUR, ALIGANJ AND JODBAGH.
CLASSIFIED BY THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (D.D.A.) AS AN URBAN VILLAGE, ITS HISTORY
CAN BE TRACED TO THE PROMINENT TOMB OF MUIZUD DIN MUBARAK SHAH, SON OF KHIZR
KHAN OF THE SAYYID DYNASTY OF THE 15TH CENTURY.
URBAN PLANNING
 URBAN PLANNING IS A TECHNICAL AND POLITICAL PROCESS CONCERNED WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF LAND, PROTECTION AND USE OF THE
ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC WELFARE, AND THE DESIGN OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT,
INCLUDING AIR, WATER, AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE PASSING INTO AND OUT
OFURBAN AREAS, SUCH AS TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS,
AND DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS.

LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY
METRO AND RAILWAY STATIONS
ROAD NETWORK
BUS STANDS
MAHATAMA GANDHI MARG
(24 M WIDE)
PRIMARY ROAD
BHISHMA PITAMAG MARG
(18 M WIDE)
SECONDARY ROAD
THERE ARE TWO MAJOR BUS STANDS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY.
1
2
JANGPURA METRO STATION (2.5 KM)
LAJPAT NAGAR METRO STATION (2 KM)
LOCATION
MAP OF DELHI LOCATING
KOTLA MUBARAKPUR
MAP OF SOUTH EXTENSION
LOCATING KOTLA MUBARKPUR
LOCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
 KOTLA MUBARAKPURIS SURROUNDED BY POSH COLONIES ( DEFENCE
COLONTY) AND MARKETS WHICH GENERATE EMPLOYMENT OPPURTUNITIES
FOR THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE LIKE HOUSE MAIDS, DRIVERS, SERVANTS,
SECURITY GAURDS ETC.
KOTLA MUBARAKPUR
SEWA NAGAR RAILWAY STATION (0.8 KM)
LODHI COLONY RAILWAY STATION (3 KM)
1
2
SUKHDEV MARKET BUS STOP (0.3 KM)
DEFENCE COLONY BUS STOP (0.5 KM)
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
ACCESSIBILITY
 KOTLA MUBARAKPUR VILLAGE IS LOCATED NEAR DEFENCE COLONY IN
SOUTH EX, NEW DELHI.
 THE SETTLEMENT IS BEEN THERE FROM THE 15TH CENTURY, LODHI
DYNASTY.
 THE VILLAGE IS SURROUNDED BY POSH COLONIES AND POSH MARKETS.

NEIGHBOURHOOD AND LANDMARKS
NEIGHBOURHOOD LANDMARKS
SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL (4.2 KM)
AIIMS (3.2 KM)
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM
(1.5 KM)
SAFDARGANJ AIRPORT AUTHORITY
(2.4KM)
CO CCO
TODAY KOTLA MUBARAKPUR
IS SURROUNDED BY POSH LOCALITIES SUCH AS DEFENCE COLONY ON THE EAST, SO
UTH EXTENSION PART 1 ON THE SOUTH, KIDWAI NAGAR ON THE WEST AND LODHI
ESTATE ON THE NORTH.
CO CCO
INFERENCE
 THE NEIGHBOURHOOD OF KOTLA MUBARAKPUR HELPS TO GENERATE JOB
OPPURTUNITIES FOR THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE. FOR EXAMPLE EMPLOYMENT
IN HOUSES AS DRIVERS, HOUSE MAIDS ETC.

HISTORY
EVOLUTION
AREAS INHABITED BY DISPLACED PE
OPLE POST INDIA‐PAKISTAN PARTITI
ON (1947).
KOTLA, THE OLDEST SETTLEMENT W
HICH ORIGINATED IN THE 15TH CEN
TURY.
THE ALIGANJ & PILANJI GROUP OF
SETTLEMENT, FORMED BY FAMILIES
REHABILITATED AFTER EVICTION F
ROM AREAS WHICH WERE ACQUIR
ED FOR THE NEW DELHI CAPITAL PR
OJECT.
AREAS INHABITED BY GROUPS OF
MIGRANTS WHO CAME TO DELHI
MAINLY AS LABOURERS DURING D
IFFERENT PHASES OF THE CAPITAL C
ONSTRUCTION PROJECT (1911‐47).
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
C
15TH CENTURY 17TH CENTURY (1911‐47) (1947)
C
 KOTLA MUBARAKPUR IS AN URBAN VILLAGE LIKE MEHRAULI AROUND WHICH THE SPRAWLING, MODERN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF SOUTH EX AND PRIME
RESIDENTIAL AREAS LIKE DEFENCE COLONY HAS GROWN UP.
 THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE DATES BACK TO THE SAYYID ERA WHICH WAS A SHORT LIVED ONE THAT FOLLOWED THE TUGHLAQS BUT WAS SOON OVERTHROWN BY THE
LODHIS IN THE 15TH CENTURY. MOST OF THE SURVIVING MONUMENTS ARE FROM THE SAYYID AND LODHI ERA.

BASE MAP
RING ROAD

LANDUSE PATTERN
INFERENCE:
 IT HAS A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
 THE LOCALITY IS BASICALLY RESIDENTIAL ZONE WITH MARKETS TO
SUPPORT THE DAILY NEEDS.
 IT HAS NO PARKS OR OPEN RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE DEDICAT
ED TO THE COMMUNITY APART FROM SOME MONUMENTS AND THE
IR SURROUNDING ENVELOPE.
COMMERCIAL AREA
RESIDENTIAL AREA OPEN SPACES
SOUTH-EX MARKET
TEMPLES
MIXED USE
RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACES
TEMPLES
SOUTH-EX MARKET
LEGEND

CIRCULATION PATTERN
MOTORABLE CIRCULATION
 THE MAJOR ROADS ON WHICH THE COMMERCIAL SECTOR OF
KOTLA MUBARAKPUR IS CONCENTRATED FOR EXAMPLE,
GURDWARA ROAD, SHER SINGH ROAD ETC ARE ALL MOTARABLE.
 THE WIDTH OF THE ROADS IS 8-10 M.
 ALL THE MOTARABLE ROADS ARE CEMENTED.
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
 THE ROADS ON WHICH THE MAJOR MARKET SHOPS ARE NOT
PRESENT ARE ALL NON MOTARABLE AND INVOLVE PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION.
 THE WIDTH OF THE ROADS IS 2.5-3.4 M.
PARKING
 NO OFFICAL SPACE FOR PARKING IS PROVIDED , THE RESIDENTS
PARK THEIR VEHICLES ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE VILLAGE.
 THE CONJESTION IN VEHICULAR MOVEMENT INCREASES
BEACAUSE OF THE SMALL WIDTH OF THE ROADS AND SOME
PEOPLE PARK THEIR CARS ON THE MAJAOR MOTARABLE ROADS.
INFERENCE
 THERE IS NO PROPER CIRCULATION PATTERN IN THE AREA.
 THE WIDTH OF THE ROADS IS VERY LESS WHICH RESULTS IN CONJESTION OF THE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.
 BOTH THE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ROADS ARE IN A VERY BAD CONDITION.
PARKING
VEHICULAR
MOVEMENT

PRIMARY ROAD TERTIARY ROADSECONDARY ROAD
WEEKLY MARKETS
THE WEEKLY MARKETS IS ONLY ON MONDAYS BUT
BLOCKS THE ENTIRE ROAD AND CREATES
PROBLEMS FOR THE RESIDENTS.
VENDORS
THE VENDORS STAND ANY WHERE THEY WANT, IT
CREATES CONJESTION ON THE ROADS AND HENCE
TRAFFIC.
INFORMAL ACTIVITIES
MANY PEOPLE HAVE MADE A TEMPORARY SHOP
FOR THEM ON THE ROAD SIDE, WHICH IS ILLEGAL
AND RDUCES THE ROAD WIDTH.
HEIRARCHY OF MOVEMENT PATTERN
7-8 METERS
5-6 METERS
2-3METERS

HOUSING TYPOLOGY
EVOLUTION OF HOUSING TYPOLOGY
STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
 BUILT & DESIGNED BY CONTRACTORS WITHOUT P
RIOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OR APPROVAL OF TH
E AUTHORITIES & COST CUTTING TECHNIQUES , T
HESE BUILDINGS CAN BE TERMED STRUCTURALLY
UNSAFE.
INFERENCE
 URBAN GEOMETRY OF KOTLA MUBARAKPUR IS COMPOSED
OF NARROW STREETS FLANKED WITH SHOPS ON EITHER SIDES & RESIDENCES UPSTAIRS IS A COMMON SITE.
 IT IS AN UNPLANNED MUSHROOM GROWTH WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHARACTERISTICS.
STRUCTURE
KACCHA CONSTRUCTION RCC CONSTRUCTION
PLANNING BUILDING HEIGHTS
THE HOUSEHOLD SIZE
WAS BIG BECAUSE THERE
WAS NO CONJESTION
THE HOUSEHOLD SIZE IS
COMPARITIVELY SMALL
TODAY BECAUSE OF
INCREASE IN POPULATION
THE VERTICAL EXPANSION
OF BUILDINGS WAS VERY
LESS. THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHTS UPTO G+1.
THE VERTICAL EXPANSION
IS A COMMON
PHENOMENA AND
BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE
UPTO G+4.
AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE
BUILDINGS
 THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS LIES BETWEE
N 10 M TO 15 M. SOME OF THE STRUCTURES ARE
SINGLE STOREYED ALSO.
DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS
 THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO BUILDINGS IS VERY
LESS (1 M) ON THE PEDESTRIAN ROADS
 WHEREAS THE DISTANCE IS QUITE LARGE ON
VEHICULAR ROADS.

ADDITION :
THERE WAS AN ADDITION TO THE SINGLE STOREY
STRUCTURES, THE SINGLE STOREY STRUCTURES
WERE CONVERTED INTO G+1.
TRANSITION IN CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING ADDITION
CONVERSION RECONSTRUCTION
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
THE ABOVE FIGURES DEPICT THE TRANSITION IN CONSTRUCTION IN THE VILLAGE OF KOTLA MUBARAKPUR, IT
DEPICTS THE EVOLUTION OF THE STRUCTURES FROM THE 16TH CENTURY WHEN THE SETTLEMENT BEGAN TILL
THE PRESENT DATE.
EXISTING :
THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WERE GENERALLY
SINGLE STOREY.
CONVERSION :
THE GROUND FLOORS WERE CONVERTED FROM A
RESIDENTIAL USE TO COMMERCIAL USE FOR A MODE
OF INCOME.
RECONSTRUCTION :
FURTHER MORE FLOORS WERE ADDED TO THE
STRUCTURES FOR RENTAL PURPOSES, AS IT SERVED
AS A SOURCE OF IN COME.
INFERENCE :
 FOR MAX. POPULATION, PROPERTY RENT IS THE REASON FOR PHYSICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THEIR DWELLING AND THUS, THEIR MAIN SOURCE OF INCOME.
 THE PHYSICAL TRANSFORMATION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DECREASEIN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BUILDING LESSS BECAUSE OF THE PROJECTING
BALCONIES.
 THE CONVERSION OF THE GROUND FLOORS TO COMMERCIAL USE IS ALSO FOR IN COME PURPOSES SUPPORTED BY RESIDENTIAL USE ON THE UPPER FLOORS.

 IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NUMBER OF MALES OUTNUMBERS THE NUMBER
OF FEMALES IN THE TOTAL COMPOSITION OF THE VILLAGE.
 THIS HAS ALSO BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN THE STUDY BY CAPLAN WHO SAYS THAT
IN THE CASE OF RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION, MALES ARE MORE IN NUMBER
THAN FEMALES.
 AS SHOWN IN TABLE, THERE ARE 57% MALE RESPONDENTS AS COMPARISON
TO 43% FEMALE RESPONDENTS.
GENDER COMPOSITION
GENDER NUMBER PERCENTAGE
MALE 15241 57%
FEMALE 11708 43%
TOTAL 26949 100
MALES FEMALES
1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
Population 2164 4691 8581 17321 26949
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
 THE CHART BELOW DEPICTS THE CHANGE IN TH POPULATION OF KOTLA
MUBARKPUR OVER HE YEARS.
 AS DEPICTED IN THE CHART THE POPULATION HAS INCREASED FROM 2,100
IN THE YEAR 1971 TO 27,00 IN THE YEAR 2011.
POPULATION
OCCUPATION PERCENTAGE
SERVICE 60%
SELF-EMPLOYED 38%
DAIRY ACTIVITY 2%
60%
38%
2%
Service Self-employed Dairy activity
 IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT FOR A MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION, THEIR JOBS
ARE SERVICE SECTR BASED.
 FOR MAX. POPULATION, PROPERTY RENT IS THE REASON FOR PHYSICAL
TRANSFORMATIONS OF THEIR DWELLING AND THUS, THEIR MAIN SOURCE OF
INCOME.
 SMALL BUSINESSES FORM THE MAIN SHARE OF ALTERNATE INCOME.
OCCUPATION
DEMOGRAPHICS

HERITAGE
 KOTLA MUBARAKPUR IS A VILLAGE IN SOUTH DELHI, IT CONSISTS A NUMBER OF MONUMENTS BUT ARE NOT COMPACT IN ONE COMPOUND.
 THESE MONUMENTS ARE SCATTERED OVER THE DENSELY POPULATED AREAS OF KOTLA MUBARAKPUR AND ITS ADJACENT AREAS SUCH AS KIDWAI NAGAR EAST
AND SOUTH EXTENSION.
 THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE DATES BACK TO THE SAYYID ERA WHICH WAS A SHORT LIVED ONE THAT FOLLOWED THE TUGHLAQS BUT WAS SOON OVERTHROWN BY THE
LODHIS IN THE 15TH CENTURY.
 MOST OF THE SURVIVING MONUMENTS ARE FROM THE SAYYID AND LODHI ERA.
CO CCO

PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
WATER SUPPLY
 WATER IS SUPPLIED TWO TIMES IN A DAY, MORNING AND EVENING,
THROGH SUPPLY LINES.
 THE RESIDENTS COMPLAINED THAT THE SUPPLY WATER IS NOT FIT FOR
DRINKUNG HENCE PEOPLE HAVE INSTALLED WATER PURIFIERS.
 THE COMMUNITY ALSO CONSISTS OF PRIVATE WATER PLANTS WHICH
SUPPLY WATER TO HOUSES IN CANS.
ELECTRICITY
 THERE IS A 24 HOUR ELECTRICAL SUPPLY IN KOTLA MUBARAKPUR, BUT
PEOPLE MENTIONED ABOUT SMALL POWER CUTS
 ELECTIRCITY IS SUPPLIED BY THE BSES.
 EACH AND EVERY HOUSEHOLDS CONSISTS OF ITS OWN PRIVATE METER.
 WIRES RUN ALONG THE STREETS IN A HAPHAZARD WAY, ALSO
TRANSFORMERS ARE INSTALLED ALONG THE STREETS.
SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE
 KOTLA MUBARAKPUR CONSISTS OF A PROPER SEWERAGE SYSTEM BUT DUE TO
INCREASE IN THE POPULATION THE LOAD ON THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM
INCREASES WHICH RESULTS IN CHOKING.
 WHENEVER CHOKING OCCURS THE GENERAL SCRETARY OF THE AREA
COMPLAINS TO THE MCD AND THEN THE MCD OFFICIALS COME TO CLEAR THE
BLOCKAGE.
GARBAGE
 THERE IS NO PROPER AREA WHICH IS DEFINED FOR DUMPING THE GARBGE.
 PEOPLE OFTEN DUMP GARBAGE INFRONT OF THEIR HOUSES ON THE STREETS.
 EVERY MORNING A MCD TRUCK COMES AND TO COLLECT ALL THE GARBAGE ON
THE STREETS.
 THE DUMPING OF GARBAGE ON THE STREETS CREATES A VERY UNHYGENIC
CONDITION FOR THE PEOPLE LIVING.
C
CC

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
EDUCATION
 THE VILLAGE OF KOTLA MUBARAKPUR CONSISTS OF FOUR GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS, ALL OF THEM ARE IN WORKING CONDITION
 RECENTLY ONE OF THE SCHOOLS HAVE BEEN CONVERTED INTO AN E-
SCHOOL.
 THE SCHOOLS ARE TILL PRIMARY ONLY, THERE ARE NO SECONDARY
SCHOOLS.
HEALTH CARE FACILITES
 NO HOSPITALS OR GOVERNMENTS CLINICS ARE PROVIDED IN THE VILLAGE,
THE NEAREST HOSPITAL BEING AIIMS.
 THE RESIDENTS COMMONLY USE AIIMSTHE COMMERCIAL AREA CONSISTS OF
SOME SMALL PRIVATE CLINICS.
PUBLIC TOILET FACILITY
 THERE WERE FIVE PUBLIC TOILETS WHICH WERE CONSTRUCTED BY THE
GOVERNMENT BUT THEY WERE BROKEN DOWN AND THE LAND WAS GIVEN TO
VENDORS AND OTHER PEOPLE ON RENTAL BASIS ILLEGALLY.
 RECENTLY MEENAKSHI LEKHI HAS PASSED THE CONTRUCTION OF TWO PUBLIC
TOILETS IN THE LOCALITY.
OTHER PUBLIC SPACES
 THE OPEN AND GREEN SPACES IN KOTLA MUBARAKPUR ARE NOT SUFFICIENT
TO CATER THE POPULATION AND ARE ILL-MAINTAINED.
 THERE ARE NO FUNCTIONAL PARKS OR OPEN RECREATIONAL SPACE FOR PUBLI
C IN THE LOCALITY.

1. ICCHA – THE DESIRE, KOTLA MUBARAKPUR
 EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE NGO
 TIME SPAN – 2011 TILL PRESENT
NGO’s – NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS
 PROVIDED BEST POSSIBLE TREATMENT AND CARE; BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND FAMILIES; SHARING
INFORMATION AND EXPERIENCE; ACCESSING ADVANCES IN TREATMENT FROM AROUND THE WORLD.
 PROVIDED AND FACILITATED ECONOMIC SUPPORT SO THAT AS FEW CHILDREN AS POSSIBLE SUFFER FOR LACK OF MONEY.
 PROVIDED EMOTIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT FROM DIAGNOSIS, THROUGH TREATMENT AND BEYOND, INCLUDING CHEERFUL
ENVIRONMENTS AT TREATMENT CENTERS.
 PROVIDED INFORMAL EDUCATION TO KEEP CHILDREN IN THE HABIT OF LEARNING THOUGH TREATMENT AND BEYOND.
 ENSURED CONTINUITY OF CARE AS APPROPRIATE THROUGH RELAPSE, PALLIATION OR BEREAVEMENT AND LOSS.
C
3. CAN KIDS HOME AWAY HOME, KOTLA MUBARKPUR
 HEALTHCARE – GENERALLY CANCER
PATIENTS
 YOUTH
 EDUCATION
 TIME SPAN – 2010 TILL PRESENT
C
C
2. SAKSHI, DEFENCE COLONY
 EDUCATION
 HEALTHCARE
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 ART AND CULTURE
 RECREATIONAL AND SPORTS
 TIME SPAN – 2000 TILL PRESENT
C
SOME EFFORTS BY NGO’S :

LOCATION ISSUES
 SURROUNDED BY WELL DEVELOPED COLONIES
 POPULATION PRESSURE AND THUS HAPHAZARD CONSTRUCTION
DEMOGRAPHIC ISSUES
 LOW LITERACY RATE: LESS AWARENESS
 HIGHER POPULATION DENSITY
 LARGER FAMILY SIZES: LESSER FLOOR AREA/PERSON
LEGAL ISSUES
 UNCERTAIN PROPERTY TAXES
 ILLEGAL ENCROACHMENTS
 LAND DEALS UNACCOUNTED
INFRASTRUCTURAL ISSUES
 LACK OF BASIC CIVIC AMENITIES
 STRUCTURAL WEAKNESSES
 NARROWING LANES
 POOR DRAINAGE AND SEWAGE CONDITIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
 REDUCED GREEN AND OPEN SPACES
 UNPROTECTED HERITAGE AREAS
 UNORGANIZED WASTE DISPOSAL
PROPOSED METRO LINE
NEW MODIFIED HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES
MORE SCHOOLS PROPOSED IN THE AREA
HIGH DENSITY HOUSING APPROACH
SELF HELP HOUSING
SELF SUFFICIENCY AND EFFICIENCY
FAR CHANGES
DEMOLITION OF ENCROACHED CONSTRUCTION
PROPER LAND RECORDS MAINTENANCE
STRICTER TAXATION
COLLABORATION OF ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS,
GOVT OFFICIALS VILLAGE OFFICIALS AND STAKEHOLDERS
TRAFFIC DIVERSION
PEDESTRIANIZATION OF INNER VILLAGE LANES
URBAN DESIGN SOLUTIONS – VILLAGE CENTRE/SQUARE
VERTICAL GREENS
IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTION SIGNS FOR HERITAGE SPOTS
URBAN ISSUES