1. International Property Tax Institute
From Paper to “the Cloud”:
Some Considerations on
Valuation from North America
Jerry (Jerome C.) German, ASA
IPTI Director of Education and Research
jgerman@ipti.org
International Property Tax Institute
2. Le “Think Tank” considers …
(Using the royal “We”)
Not “where we are” but …
Where do we want to be? Need to be?
Where are we in regards to the (EU or
global) competition?
What does the future “look like”?
What is “the vision” for the real estate
valuation industry?
How do we start the journey?
2
3. DATA: From Paper to “the Cloud”
(Largely in place in North America)
Perhaps THE Caveat is …
Information “sharing”
Open, freely available data
Public source insures (enforces)
impartiality and uniformity
Egalitarian ideal of a level playing field
Inherent in definition of market value
3
4. A Few “Bleeding Edge” Examples of
GIS Driven Valuation Techniques
*(Actual, implemented procedures
from 2006 county-wide revaluation)
4
5. A quick perspective on Lucas
County, Toledo, Ohio, USA
200,000 parcels (medium size in US)
Staff of 75
Modeling group of 4 people
Field appraisers, 20
GIS staff of 6 (after map conversion)
Annual budget of $3 million USD
5
7. Location Building Land
[
Estimated
Market
Value
= ∗ + ]
Estimated
Market
Value
= Neighborhood
* [ ( Quality
Class
*
Sq. Feet
+
Baths
)+(
Living area
Topo
*
Width
+
Lot size
) ]
[( )]
Estimated Building Building
)+ (
General Land Land
Market = Quality quality * Quantity Quality * Quantity
Value % ∗ % $ % $
7
8. Use GIS (Geographic Information
Systems) for display and analysis
Perhaps the most important enhancement
to (mass) valuation since the evolution of
CAMA (Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal)
8
10. How do you include a spatial
component (variable) in a valuation
model?
It can take two forms in the model
Rather traditional neighborhood adjustment
factor (dummy or categorical variable)
refined and verified with spatial analysis
Interpolated location proxy surface variable
derived through spatial or geostatistical
analysis creating a continuous, no boundary
location adjustment factor
10
11. Hard Coded Residential Neighborhoods
Neighborhood Number
Table Driven
Categorical or Dummy
Variable Location
Adjustment
11
12. Response Surface of Location Adjustment Factors
Smoothed (Averaged) by Physical Blocks
Red = Adjustment Factor of
1.0 and higher
Blue = Adjustment Factor of
.99 and lower
12
13. Commercial Sales Comparison Location Factor 2-D
OHIO TURNPIKE VILL A
ArrowHead Sales Prices GE
Y
SS
BA
EM TE
RYAN
IN
PO
CK
NDS
Y RY
LE KO
AN
REYNOL DS
INDIAN WOO D
C
M HI
W OO D LA
MID DLESBRO UGH
I 475
TO LL GA TE
H
O
LL
W K
AN
A HA
D
M
TO K
I 475
PIC CADILLY
BR I C K-
OS
YAR D SAL ISBU
RY
AG
D U SS
E
EL
BR
IAR
KIT
ARROWHEAD
WES
F IE
T M EA OX FOR D
DO W
LD
S
I 475
STRAYER
LD LONGBOW
W EAT HER FIE
FO
CO
RD
M AU M
NA
EE W E
S TE R
NT
N
IL LIN O
IS
13
17. Spatially “Enabled” 2006 APARTMENT MODELS
PGI PgiNraLoc^1.35*AgeMult^(-.05)*((8000/Nra)^.04)*.45*Nra
VAC CondLv^(-.4) *AgeMult^(-.2)*VacLoc^.7*.43
EXP GradeLv^(-.1)*CondLv^(-.1)*AgeMult^(-.02) *ExpLoc *.96
CAP CondLv^(-.01)*CapLoc^1.05*1.075
CAP VALUE ((Pg*(1-Va))*(1-Ex))/Ca
GRM GradeLv^.3*CondLv^.6*GrmLoc^.85*AgeMult^.1*LogUnits^(-.14)*1.4
GRM VALUE Pgi*Grm
SALECOMP VAL. GradeLv^.5*CondLv^.5*SaleLoc^1.1*AgeMult^.05*35*Gba*((8000/Gba)^.07)
17
18. The Way Ahead
Competition in global markets
Driven by information
Information stored in (mostly) uniform databases
Uniform data definitions (metadata)
Data comes predominately from property tax
systems or cadastres
Private industry will leverage data and systems
for economic advantage
18
19. Thank You
IPTI @ www.ipti.org
International Property Tax Institute
4950 Yonge Street
Suite 2308
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2N 6K1
(416) 644-2772
(416) 644-5152
jgerman@ipti.org
International Property Tax Institute