1. WITNESS uses video to open the eyes of the world
to human rights violations
Making Your Video Advocacy Successful
October 7, 2011
Chris Michael, WITNESS
Video Advocacy Training Manager
WITNESS.org
2. WHO ARE WE?
1. Name
2. Where you are from
3. Advocacy work / experience
WITNESS.org
3. WHAT ARE WE DOING?
1. Learn WITNESS’ Video Advocacy Methodology
2. Review (successful) case studies
3. Filming safely and securely for change
4. See innovative uses of video for change
5. What’s next?
WITNESS.org
4. WITNESS: VIDEO FOR CHANGE
19 years
80 countries
300 partner organizations
1000’s of human rights
defenders
4000 hours of archived
human rights footage
WITNESS.org
5. HARNESSING TECHNOLOGY
FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
EQUIPPING
cameras & tools
EMPOWERING
training human rights
defenders
ENABLING
growing P2P networks
WITNESS.org
8. TOOLS FOR A REASON
JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN, DOESN’T MEAN YOU
SHOULD.
- My (most incredible) mom
Tactics that optimally support the advocacy.
Tools that optimally support the tactic.
All should both build and harness power - and be
integrated.
WITNESS.org
9. VIDEO ADVOCACY
Video advocacy is about effectively using
the power of stories, visual evidence and
personal testimony as part of a human
rights advocacy strategy to engage people
to act and create change in human rights
law, policy, practice and behavior.
WITNESS.org
10. EXERCISE
In a group of three-four persons, share an
experience of video being used for human rights
advocacy.
Discuss together in the small group what made
it effective.
After ten minutes, we’ll hear a sample of the
examples.
WITNESS.org
11. WITNESS’ TOP 5
1. Video made for a reason, not about something
2. Video made for a specific audience
3. Video with a clear and doable request for action
from the audience
4. Video with a strong message and the best
messengers to move the audience to action
5. Video that can, and will, be seen by the audience
WITNESS.org
12. FOR WITNESS, VA IS NOT…
• A substitute for other advocacy tools: reports,
mobiles, lobbying, etc.
• Used primarily as a publicity, educational or
training tool
• Just for professional filmmakers or journalists or
media experts
• Necessarily dependent on strong graphic imagery
for impact
1/10/2012 WITNESS.org 11
13. EXERCISE
In a group of three-four persons, use the
example of the film and your own experience to
discuss the strengths and limitations of video
being used for human rights advocacy.
Note your ideas on post-its using no more than
4-5 words – try to identify 3-4 advantages and
3-4 limitations
After ten minutes, we’ll gather the post-its on
the wall and see what groupings emerge
WITNESS.org
14. STRENGTHS LIMITATIONS/SHORTCOMINGS
1) Show or contextualize a
violation or its aftermath 1) Depends on access to places and
people
2) Put a face on human rights
advocacy by telling a 2) Limitations in covering structural
personal story issues
3) Compress, contrast and 3) Weak for deep quantitative
juxtapose situations analysis and complex procedural
issues
4) Use emotional power to
communicate to an audience 4) Technological divide still exists
and does not change/remove
5) Detail specific cases or issues of representation, and
incidents that are emblematic process can be less participatory
of patterns during editing
6) Be a democratic and
participatory medium 5) Can jeopardize lives
7) Serve as a shield
Advocacy and Propaganda?
1/10/2012 WITNESS.org 13
17. LANDMARKS OF A VIDEO ADVOCACY
Safety, Security & Consent CAMPAIGN
1. Advocacy Goal
2. Target Audiences
3. Message
4. Story
5. Distribution
6. Archive
7. Impact Evaluation
WITNESS.org
18. The measure of success is
change on the ground – not
simply a video being made.
WITNESS.org
19. Video is the medium
Advocacy is the purpose
Change is the goal.
WITNESS.org
20. STEP 1: SMART OBJECTIVES
• Establish the purpose of
the video within broader
advocacy strategy
• Set clear and specific
objectives for the video,
specifying what they are,
and how they can be
achieved
WITNESS.org
21. GOAL: Stop violence Pressure law
SMART against sex workers enforcement to adopt &
OBJECTIVES enforce HOPS policy
recommendations to
curb violence against
sex workers by August
2011.
• Specific
• Measurable
• Achievable
• Realistic
• Time-bound
WITNESS.org
22. NOT Specific: Empower students to do environmental accountability research in Brazil
Specific: Provide technological support to Brazilian film students to help document
corporate violations of environmental laws in south and southeast Brazil and place this
evidence before national stakeholders including …
NOT Measurable: The video screening should evoke more uplifting responses from the
public.
Measurable: The video screening will secure a 15% increase in participation in local
community dialogue in this location over the next six months.
NOT Achievable: The video will make officials act to push for ratification of the Kyoto
Protocol.
Achievable: During our advocacy briefing, we will provide a video report with
accompanying recommendations for interim steps to support the upcoming legislative
debate on ratification.
NOT Realistic: Attendance at our video events will quadruple last year’s attendance.
Realistic: We should aim for a 5% increase in attendance for this year’s video event
while maintaining our routine efforts.
NOT Time-bound: We hope the anti-discrimination law passes as soon as possible.
Time-bound: We aim to have the anti-discrimination law passed by August 1st, 2009.
WITNESS.org
24. STEP 2: TARGET AUDIENCES
• Who has an influence on your advocacy goal?
Who should be reached and persuaded?
• What is their perspective or attitude to the issue?
• What is their level of awareness?
• What is their level of knowledge?
• Who are your secondary audiences who can
pressure your primary audience?
WITNESS.org
25. Storytelling puts the human
into human rights.
Story is at the heart of video …
without a compelling story,
your audience will not be moved to act.
WITNESS.org
26. What
… is visual storytelling for human rights
DEFINED: The strategic use of images,
pictures, and sounds to tell stories that can
pressure, shame, move or compel key
audiences to take action that will protect,
defend and uphold human rights.
GOAL: The story inspires the action you want
from the audience.
WITNESS.org
27. How
… can you Tell a Good Story, part 1, the philosophy
Andy Goodman’s 10 Rules for Storytelling
1. Stories are about people
2. Stories need to be fixed in time and space
3. Stories speak the audience‟s language
4. Stories stir up emotions
5. Stories don‟t tell. They show.
6. Stories have at least one “moment of truth”
7. Stories have clear meaning
8. The people in your story have to want something
9. Let your characters speak for themselves
10. Audiences bore easily so stories need
challenges/obstacles WITNESS.org
28. HOW
The 6 Guiding Principles of Story:
1. VOICES: The people (or text) who tell the story
2. STRUCTURE: The way in which your film is organized
or in other words, the backbone
3. AUDIO/VISUAL ELEMENTS: What you hear and see
on screen
4. STYLE: What your films „looks & feels‟ like
5. ETHICAL REPRESENTATION: How you honor a
person‟s dignity and respect their privacy
6. SPACE FOR ACTION: A concrete and specific act your
audience can take to create change
WITNESS.org
29. ESSENTIAL: CREDIBILITY
– Emotional: The voices that speak to the viewer‟s
heart
– Analytical: The voices that support the facts
– Ethical: The voices that must be included for
ethical reasons and agency
– Political: The voices your audience trusts and
needs to hear from
WITNESS.org
30. STEP 3: STRATEGIC MESSAGES
Resonate & Compel
• What are the 1-5 key facts / sentences / points
that will resonate with your audience and thus
must be in your documentary?
WITNESS.org
31. KEY QUESTIONS
• What is the message you need to get to this
audience?
• Are you educating, engaging or activating?
• What story will be persuasive, compelling or
motivating for this audience?
• What voices is it important to have in the video in
order to have political, ethical, analytical and
emotional credibility and impact?
WITNESS.org
32. REVIEWING VIDEOS
1. What is the Objective of the video?
2. What is the Audience of the video?
3. What is the Message of the video?
4. What is the Story of the video?
5. What is the request for action?
WITNESS.org
33. STEP 4: RIGHT STORY
1. Condense your story to one sentence.
2. How will you tell the story? Knowing your
audience you can now choose:
– Voices – who is included? who is excluded?
– Style – MTV vs. News vs. ?
– Structure – beginning -> middle -> end -> ACTION
– A/V Elements – what sound and visuals are in it?
– Length – driven by your primary audience(!)
– Language – driven by your primary audience(!)
– SPACE FOR ACTION – and clear request for it
WITNESS.org
34. STEP 5: STRATEGIC DISTRO
• Who are your distribution allies?
• Timing: Is there a key premiere date?
• Sequencing: What are your distribution opps?
• Choosing the right “messenger”
WITNESS.org
In short: Using video to change practices, policies & laws. (Rose
What Video Advocacy is NOT…An effective tool on its own. Must be part of broader advocacy strategy and other hr methodologies. Video simply as a communications, fundraising or PR tool. Rather an advocacy tool to promote changes in human rights policy or practice.Just for professionals. You can use their help, but the understanding and intent should come from hr activists for use in advocacy as you are rooted in this. Also possibilities of access and long-term understanding of activists.Not just about strong graphic imagery. Most WITNESS partners’ work is testimony-based.Not for every human rights issues. Like all approaches, has strengths and weaknesses.
Brainstorm the strengths and shortcomings of video. What kind of stories is it good at telling? What kind of images is it best for capturing? What aspects of the process of creating a video for advocacy are strengths? What are potential or actual shortcomings or limitations?ADVANTAGESPersonal testimony (eye contact)“Put a face on it”: Voices of those directly affected can be brought to locations that our otherwise inaccessible (eg. refugees, marginalized people); truth-telling senseDirect evidence of a violation (seeing is believing; ‘indisputable’)‘Presencing’ direct neglect or inaction of authorities (recording inaction of police/local officials, and holding accountable to higher authorities)Emotional/visceral impact encouraging to action - flip side is mis-use in propaganda; depends on integrity of filmmaker/activistAudience is less literate in editing; tends to place trust in television and be less questioning of how put together; opportunity to abuse trust depends on integrity of makerPowerful at illustrating contrasts (between places/and over time – eg IDP settlements in Burma?)Depends on compression (linked to contrast)Make links of individual stories and systemic issues; emblematic cases of wider problems.Storytelling potential – including power of positive envisioning, particularly relevant in ESC/other rights where fulfillment can seem distantCan create space for actionGood for case-study approach and for violations-based cases where documenting individual stories; not good for quantitative analysis. Accessible to most – does not require literacy, and potential to share information, and engage viewers in debates (cf. Lessons from participatory development communication). Particularly relevant if we are talking about empowering groups themselves in a struggle. Not all audiences are external.Process and product can be representative of marginalized groupsThrough good visual and verbal storytelling can emphasize indivisibility of rights – someone can talk about how they were denied justice at police station; shots of them at home in poverty can dramatically and in an unspoken manner highlight a whyCan simplify and clarify issuesPROCESSCan be strongly participatory – visual medium, easy-to-use technology, easy to share material and discussEmpowering to users (easy to learn how to do)Can film where difficult to get access (undercover RAWA, trafficking)Requires planningPotential deterrent to abuses occurring as recording eventsLIMITATIONSNot good for abstract conceptsCan reduce complex structural issues to personal stories and lose the bigger pictureAudience can be too trusting. Potential risk to people involved in filming and distributionEditing process can be non-participatoryCan intrude into privacy; need to take extra care with consent and securityCan be a shield or a targetPROCESS: Hand out Powerpoint slides
These are some key elements to our approach which are also key concerns that are relevant to any hr worker using video:We empower local human rights activists and concerned citizens within affected communities; not just video professionals. Video originates in the advocacy and is embedded in it throughoutVideo is a tool alongside other campaign elements. Since you’re using video as part of a campaign its not necessarily about reaching the most people, its about reaching the right people – seven members of a review body, 15 members of a government committee, key shareholders in a business, 100 youth organizers, 2000 online solidarity supporters of your cause. And its about reaching them at the right time. The video advocacy starts with the objective and audience, not the issue or story.We know that with there is growing saturation of images and stories of despair – so we need to also include concrete solutions, and a clear space for action by the audience. And we need to convey the direct ‘asks’ of the beneficiaries of the advocacy in a way that visual media makes possible. Storytelling is key and its not just about visual imagery of horror.Finally, safety, security and ethics are critical I’m going to mention a couple of examples of real impact using video to mobilize and to target key audiences – one that draw more on targeted advocacy screenings to highlight a human rights situation, bring voices from the ground to policymakers and push for specific action